II--"I DECIDED TO START A REVOLUTION"

I clearly perceived then that the government of Alexander II introduced

reforms only on paper, only seeking to create the impression that it

desired to better the life of the population. Actually, however, the

government wickedly persecuted every attempt to help the laboring

people to emerge from the darkness into light, to approach knowledge,

to proclaim its own rights.

It was clearly evident, not only in our locality but throughout the

whole of Russia, that the government feared knowledge in the people and

endeavored to keep it in a state of rightless slavery. This compelled

me to seek another path, another way of working in the interest of

my beloved people, and toward the end of the '60s I decided to go to

Russia in search of men with whom to start an illegal struggle, i.e.,

a movement forbidden under the Czar's laws.

For more than two years I wandered about Russia, ever looking for

some revolutionary centre, which could exist only as an underground

organization. Gradually, by changing one kind of work for another,

I penetrated into a rather large organization, which had decided to

get personally in contact with the people, not through books and

proclamations.

At that time the difference between the sea of peasants and the little

lake of intellectuals was so great that they were, entirely ignorant of

one another. Besides, the moujik's suspicion of any person bearing the

appearance of a "gentleman" was so deeply rooted that it was impossible

to carry to the peasant and labor midst any message and retain the

dress of the gentry. It was necessary to change the appearance from

foot to head, to look a perfect plebeian.

I put on a peasant dress, threw a bag across my shoulder, obtained a

stick and set out to tramp. Although I did not tramp the country long,

only one summer, yet I succeeded in visiting many villages, and nowhere

did I meet with distrust. The peasants eagerly listened to my talks and

those of my comrades. We told them that the land ought not belong to

the few; that it should be placed in possession of all the people, of

all those who wish to toil on it; that there ought not be such a system

which permits the selling, mortgaging, buying and renting of thousands

of acres by a few hands, while people were starving nearby because they

lacked the land from which to obtain bread. The peasants would agree

with us and also say that the land ought to belong to those who labor

on it, who till it.

We would also tell them that the landlords were oppressing the people;

that they had seized all the government in their hands; that the

bureaucracy was fraternizing with the landlords, hindering the people

from living a free life. In this the peasants would also agree with us.

We had difficulty only talking about one subject, the Czar. We tried to

explain to the peasants that the Czar was acting concertedly with the

nobility and bureaucracy, that he it was who was the chief oppressor of

the people. But the peasants would not want to believe it. They were so

distant in those days from understanding state affairs, being unable to

read, because of general illiteracy, and lacking fundamental knowledge,

that they had no idea how much evil the Czarist form of government had

done to the nation.

The peasants trusted the Czar; they were convinced that the Czar was

a kind master of Russia who had to maintain an army to defend her

from enemies, and that the peasants had to till the land, pay taxes,

for the maintenance of the army. They thought that the Czar loved his

people and took care of them, and, if officials did oppress the people

sometimes, it was due to the fact that they deceived the Czar. And if

the Czar were only to learn the whole truth he would drive out the

officials and again become a loving father to his people.

True Stories of the Great War, Volume 5 (of 6) Tales of Adventure--Heroic Deeds--Exploits Told by the Soldiers, Officers, Nurses, Diplomats, Eye Witnesses · 第 117 / 181 题