CHAPTER XXVIII.

The Guilty Man

(Tuesday, September 18; 1 p. m.)

Vance slept late the following morning, and spent the hour or so

before lunch checking a catalogue of ceramics which were to be

auctioned next day at the Anderson Galleries. At one o’clock we

entered the Stuyvesant Club and joined Markham in the grill.

“The lunch is on you, old thing,” said Vance. “But I’ll make it easy.

All I want is a rasher of English bacon, a cup of coffee, and a

croissant.”

Markham gave him a mocking smile.

“I don’t wonder you’re economizing after your bad luck of last night.”

Vance’s eyebrows went up.

“I rather fancied my luck was most extr’ordin’ry.”

“You held four of a kind twice, and lost both hands.”

“But, y’ see,” blandly confessed Vance, “I happened to know both times

exactly what cards my opponents held.”

Markham stared at him in amazement.

“Quite so,” Vance assured him. “I had arranged before the game, d’ ye

see, to have those particular hands dealt.” He smiled benignly. “I

can’t tell you, old chap, how I admire your delicacy in not referring

to my rather unique guest, Mr. Allen, whom I had the bad taste to

introduce so unceremoniously into your party. I owe you an explanation

and an apology. Mr. Allen is not what one would call a charming

companion. He is deficient in the patrician elegancies, and his

display of jewellery was a bit vulgar—though I infinitely preferred

his diamond studs to his piebald tie. But Mr. Allen has his

points—decidedly he has his points. He ranks with Andy Blakely,

Canfield, and Honest John Kelly as an indoor soldier of fortune. In

fact, our Mr. Allen is none other than Doc Wiley Allen, of fragrant

memory.”

“Doc Allen! Not the notorious old crook who ran the Eldorado Club?”

“The same. And, incidentally, one of the cleverest card manipulators

in a once lucrative but shady profession.”

“You mean this fellow Allen stacked the cards last night?” Markham was

indignant.

“Only for the two hands you mentioned. Allen, if you happen to

remember, was the dealer both times. I, who purposely sat on his

right, was careful to cut the cards in accordance with his

instructions. And you really must admit that no stricture can possibly

attach to my deception, inasmuch as the only beneficiaries of Allen’s

manipulations were Cleaver and Spotswoode. Although Allen did deal me

four of a kind on each occasion, I lost heavily both times.”

Markham regarded Vance for a moment in puzzled silence, and then

laughed good-naturedly.

“You appear to have been in a philanthropic mood last night. You

practically gave Mannix a thousand dollars by permitting him to double

the stakes on each draw. A rather quixotic procedure, I should say.”

“It all depends on one’s point of view, don’t y’ know. Despite my

financial losses—which, by the bye, I have every intention of charging

up to your office budget—the game was most successful. . . . Y’ see, I

attained the main object of my evening’s entertainment.”

“Oh, I remember!” said Markham vaguely, as if the matter, being of

slight importance, had for the moment eluded his memory. “I believe

you were going to ascertain who murdered the Odell girl.”

“Amazin’ memory! . . . Yes, I let fall the hint that I might be able

to clarify the situation to-day.”

“And whom am I to arrest?”

Vance took a drink of coffee and slowly lit a cigarette.

“I’m quite convinced, y’ know, that you won’t believe me,” he

returned, in an even, matter-of-fact voice. “But it was Spotswoode who

killed the girl.”

“You don’t tell me!” Markham spoke with undisguised irony. “So it was

Spotswoode! My dear Vance, you positively bowl me over. I would

telephone Heath at once to polish up his handcuffs, but,

unfortunately, miracles—such as strangling persons from across

town—are not recognized possibilities in this day and age. . . . Do

let me order you another croissant.”

Vance extended his hands in a theatrical gesture of exasperated

despair.

“For an educated, civilized man, Markham, there’s something downright

primitive about the way you cling to optical illusions. I say, y’

know, you’re exactly like an infant who really believes that the

magician generates a rabbit in a silk hat, simply because he sees it

done.”

“Now you’re becoming insulting.”

“Rather!” Vance pleasantly agreed. “But something drastic must be done

to disentangle you from the Lorelei of legal facts. You’re so

deficient in imagination, old thing.”

“I take it that you would have me close my eyes and picture Spotswoode

sitting up-stairs here in the Stuyvesant Club and extending his arms

to 71st Street. But I simply couldn’t do it. I’m a commonplace chap.

Such a vision would strike me as ludicrous; it would smack of a

hasheesh dream. . . . You yourself don’t use _Cannabis indica_, do

you?”

“Put that way, the idea does sound a bit supernatural. And yet:

_Certum est quia impossibile est_. I rather like that maxim, don’t y’

know; for, in the present case, the impossible is true. Oh,

Spotswoode’s guilty—no doubt about it. And I’m going to cling

tenaciously to that apparent hallucination. Moreover, I’m going to try

to lure you into its toils; for your own—as we absurdly say—good name

is at stake. As it happens, Markham, you are at this moment shielding

the real murderer from publicity.”

Vance had spoken with the easy assurance that precludes argument; and

from the altered expression on Markham’s face I could see he was

moved.

“Tell me,” he said, “how you arrived at your fantastic belief in

Spotswoode’s guilt.”

Vance crushed out his cigarette and folded his arms on the table.

“We begin with my quartet of possibilities—Mannix, Cleaver, Lindquist,

and Spotswoode. Realizing, as I did, that the crime was carefully

planned with the sole object of murder, I knew that only some one

hopelessly ensnared in the lady’s net could have done it. And no

suitor outside of my quartet could have been thus enmeshed, or we

would have learned of him. Therefore, one of the four was guilty. Now,

Lindquist was eliminated when we found out that he was bedridden in a

hospital at the time of Skeel’s murder; for obviously the same person

committed both crimes——”

“But,” interrupted Markham, “Spotswoode had an equally good alibi for

the night of the Canary’s murder. Why eliminate one and not the

other?”

“Sorry, but I can’t agree with you. Being prostrated at a known place

surrounded by incorruptible and disinterested witnesses, both

preceding and during an event, is one thing; but being actually on the

ground, as Spotswoode was that fatal evening, within a few minutes of

the time the lady was murdered, and then being alone in a taxicab for

fifteen minutes or so following the event—that is another thing. No

one, as far as we know, actually saw the lady alive after Spotswoode

took his departure.”

“But the proof of her having been alive and spoken to him is

incontestable.”

“Granted. I admit that a dead woman doesn’t scream and call for help,

and then converse with her murderer.”

“I see.” Markham spoke with sarcasm. “You think it was Skeel,

disguising his voice.”

“Lord no! What a priceless notion! Skeel didn’t want any one to know

he was there. Why should he have staged such a masterpiece of idiocy?

That certainly isn’t the explanation. When we find the answer it will

be reasonable and simple.”

“That’s encouraging,” smiled Markham. “But proceed with your reasons

for Spotswoode’s guilt.”

“Three of my quartet, then, were potential murderers,” Vance resumed.

“Accordingly, I requested an evening of social relaxation, that I

might put them under the psychological microscope, as it were.

Although Spotswoode’s ancestry was wholly consistent with his having

been the guilty one, nevertheless I confess I thought that Cleaver or

Mannix had committed the crime; for, by their own statements, either

of them could have done it without contradicting any of the known

circumstances of the situation. Therefore, when Mannix declined your

invitation to play poker last night, I put Cleaver to the first test.

I wig-wagged to Mr. Allen, and he straightway proceeded to perform his

first feat of prestidigitation.”

Vance paused and looked up.

“You perhaps recall the circumstances? It was a jack-pot. Allen dealt

Cleaver a four-straight-flush and gave me three kings. The other hands

were so poor that every one else was compelled to drop out. I opened;

and Cleaver stayed. On the draw, Allen gave me another king, and gave

Cleaver the card he needed to complete his straight-flush. Twice I bet

a small amount, and each time Cleaver raised me. Finally I called him,

and, of course, he won. He couldn’t help but win, d’ ye see. He was

betting on a sure-thing. Since I opened the pot and drew two cards,

the highest hand I could possibly have held would have been four of a

kind. Cleaver knew this, and having a straight-flush, he also knew,

before he raised my bet, that he had me beaten. At once I realized

that he was not the man I was after.”

“By what reasoning?”

“A poker-player, Markham, who would bet on a sure-thing is one who

lacks the egotistical self-confidence of the highly subtle and

supremely capable gambler. He is not a man who will take hazardous

chances and tremendous risks, for he possesses, to some degree, what

the psychoanalysts call an inferiority complex, and instinctively he

grasps at every possible opportunity of protecting and bettering

himself. In short, he is not the ultimate, unadulterated gambler. And

the man who killed the Odell girl was a supreme gambler who would

stake everything on a single turn of the wheel, for, in killing her,

that is exactly what he did. And only a gambler whose paramount

self-confidence would make him scorn, through sheer egotism, to bet on

a sure-thing, could have committed such a crime.—Therefore, Cleaver

was eliminated as a suspect.”

Markham was now listening intently.

“The test to which I put Spotswoode a little later,” Vance went on,

“had originally been intended for Mannix, but he was out of the game.

That didn’t matter, however, for, had I been able to eliminate both

Cleaver and Spotswoode, then Mannix would undoubtedly have been the

guilty man. Of course I would have planned something else to

substantiate the fact; but, as it was, that wasn’t necess’ry. . . .

The test I applied to Spotswoode was pretty well explained by the

gentleman himself. As he said, not one player in a thousand would have

wagered the limit against a pat hand, when he himself held nothing. It

was tremendous—superb! It was probably the most remarkable bluff ever

made in a game of poker. I couldn’t help admiring him when he calmly

shoved forward all his chips, knowing, as I did, that he held nothing.

He staked everything, d’ ye see, wholly on his conviction that he

could follow my reasoning step by step and, in the last analysis,

outwit me. It took courage and daring to do that. And it also took a

degree of self-confidence which would never have permitted him to bet

on a sure-thing. The psychological principles involved in that hand

were identical with those of the Odell crime. I threatened Spotswoode

with a powerful hand—a pat hand—just as the girl, no doubt, threatened

him; and instead of compromising—instead of calling me or laying

down—he outreached me; he resorted to one supreme coup, though it

meant risking everything. . . . My word, Markham! Can’t you see how

the man’s character, as revealed in that amazing gesture, dovetails

with the psychology of the crime?”

Markham was silent for a while; he appeared to be pondering the

matter.

“But you yourself, Vance, were not satisfied at the time,” he

submitted at length. “In fact, you looked doubtful and worried.”

“True, old dear. I was no end worried. The psychological proof of

Spotswoode’s guilt came so dashed unexpectedly—I wasn’t looking for

it, don’t y’ know. After eliminating Cleaver I had a _parti pris_, so

to speak, in regard to Mannix; for all the material evidence in favor

of Spotswoode’s innocence—that is, the seeming physical impossibility

of his having strangled the lady—had, I admit, impressed me. I’m not

perfect, don’t y’ know. Being unfortunately human, I’m still

susceptible to the malicious animal magnetism about facts and

appearances, which you lawyer chaps are continuously exuding over the

earth like some vast asphyxiating effluvium. And even when I found

that Spotswoode’s psychological nature fitted perfectly with all the

factors of the crime, I still harbored a doubt in regard to Mannix. It

was barely possible that he would have played the hand just as

Spotswoode played it. That is why, after the game was over, I tackled

him on the subject of gambling. I wanted to check his psychological

reactions.”

“Still, he staked everything on one turn of the wheel, as you put it.”

“Ah! But not in the same sense that Spotswoode did. Mannix is a

cautious and timid gambler as compared with Spotswoode. To begin with,

he had an equal chance and an even bet, whereas Spotswoode had no

chance at all—his hand was worthless. And yet Spotswoode wagered the

limit on a pure bit of mental calculation. That was gambling in the

higher ether. On the other hand, Mannix was merely tossing a coin,

with an even chance of winning. Furthermore, no calculation of any

kind entered into it; there was no planning, no figuring, no daring.

And, as I have told you from the start, the Odell murder was

premeditated and carefully worked out with shrewd calculation and

supreme daring. . . . And what true gambler would ask an adversary to

double a bet on the second flip of the coin, and then accept an offer

to redouble on the third flip? I purposely tested Mannix in that way,

so as to preclude any possibility of error. Thus I not only eliminated

him—I expunged him, eradicated him, wiped him out utterly. It cost me

a thousand dollars, but it purged my mind of any lingering doubt. I

then knew, despite all the contr’ry material indications, that

Spotswoode had done away with the lady.”

“You make your case theoretically plausible. But, practically, I’m

afraid I can’t accept it.” Markham was more impressed, I felt, than he

cared to admit. “Damn it, man!” he exploded after a moment. “Your

conclusion demolishes all the established landmarks of rationality and

sane credibility.—Just consider the facts.” He had now reached the

argumentative stage of his doubt. “You say Spotswoode is guilty. Yet

we know, on irrefutable evidence, that five minutes after he came out

of the apartment the girl screamed and called for help. He was

standing by the switchboard, and, accompanied by Jessup, he went to

the door and carried on a brief conversation with her. She was

certainly alive then. Then he went out the front door, entered a

taxicab, and drove away. Fifteen minutes later he was joined by Judge

Redfern as he alighted from the taxicab in front of the club

here—nearly forty blocks away from the apartment-house! It would have

been impossible for him to have made the trip in less time; and,

moreover, we have the chauffeur’s record. Spotswoode simply did not

have either the opportunity or the time to commit the murder between

half past eleven and ten minutes of twelve when Judge Redfern met him.

And, remember, he played poker in the club here until three in the

morning—hours after the murder took place.”

Markham shook his head with emphasis.

“Vance, there’s no human way to get round those facts. They’re firmly

established; and they preclude Spotswoode’s guilt as effectively and

finally as though he had been at the North Pole that night.”

Vance was unmoved.

“I admit everything you say,” he rejoined. “But as I have stated

before, when material facts and psychological facts conflict, the

material facts are wrong. In this case, they may not actually be

wrong, but they’re deceptive.”

“Very well, _magnus Apollo!_” The situation was too much for Markham’s

exacerbated nerves. “Show me how Spotswoode could have strangled the

girl and ransacked the apartment, and I’ll order Heath to arrest him.”

“’Pon my word, I can’t do it,” expostulated Vance. “Omniscience was

denied me. But—deuce take it!—I think I’ve done rather well in

pointing out the culprit. I never agreed to expound his technic, don’t

y’ know.”

“So! Your vaunted penetration amounts only to that, does it? Well,

well! Here and now I become a professor of the higher mental sciences,

and I pronounce solemnly that Doctor Crippen murdered the Odell girl.

To be sure, Crippen’s dead; but that fact doesn’t interfere with my

newly adopted psychological means of deduction. Crippen’s nature, you

see, fits perfectly with all the esoteric and recondite indications of

the crime. To-morrow I’ll apply for an order of exhumation.”

Vance looked at him with waggish reproachfulness, and sighed.

“Recognition of my transcendent genius, I see, is destined to be

posthumous. _Omnia post obitum fingit majora vetustas._ In the

meantime I bear the taunts and jeers of the multitude with a stout

heart. My head is bloody, but unbowed.”

He looked at his watch, and then seemed to become absorbed with some

line of thought.

“Markham,” he said, after several minutes, “I’ve a concert at three

o’clock, but there’s an hour to spare. I want to take another look at

that apartment and its various approaches. Spotswoode’s trick—and I’m

convinced it was nothing more than a trick—was enacted there; and if

we are ever to find the explanation, we shall have to look for it on

the scene.”

I had got the impression that Markham, despite his emphatic denial of

the possibility of Spotswoode’s guilt, was not entirely unconvinced.

Therefore, I was not surprised when, with only a half-hearted protest,

he assented to Vance’s proposal to revisit the Odell apartment.

The "Canary" murder case · 第 28 / 30 章