CHAPTER II

THE HISTORY OF A COMPACT

Three years earlier there had been an appalling railway accident

between Cordova and Seville. Two tightly packed trains had come into

collision, with results that had prevented even the Spanish officials

from hushing up the _contretemps_, and had sent an electric wave of

shudders over the whole news-reading world. Among the second division

of its victims, the dangerously, even mortally, wounded, there appeared

one name at least which added, in England, at any rate, to the

sensational interest which for nearly a week the affair induced. It was

that of the most prominent coming man of the day, Paul Gastineau, K.C.,

M.P., a man who had indeed arrived and who was bound, in French phrase,

to go far. Lay politicians were fond of quoting one another that a man

of such marvellous brain-power and capability for hard work had the

easy and certain reversion to the Woolsack: members of his own branch

of the profession, if they did not agree with the forecast, let it pass

unchallenged; while there were many grains of intentional truth in the

chaff indulged in by the other branch when they would declare that the

solicitor, who, having a fighting case on hand, failed to retain Paul

Gastineau, laid himself open to an action for negligence.

For Gastineau was above all things a fighter, and one who fought with

his brains as well as with his tongue; a distinction which they who

know courts of law will readily appreciate. An awkward adversary, ever

in deadly earnest, who always fenced with the button off; his enemies

and defeated opponents, and they were many, said not too scrupulously;

but he fought to win, and usually did win, leaving mere niceties and

quibbles to the schoolmen; and to have the knack of winning means much,

if not everything. It meant much for Paul Gastineau. He became the most

talked about man at the Bar, and his enemies being too human to let his

praises pass in silence, simply added their voices to the babble that

made him known. Our forefathers were stupid enough to regard the envy,

hatred and malice that attend on success as something of a drawback;

a toll, they called it, paid for being eminent: we know better, and

nowadays the wisely successful man regards his detractors as a valuable

asset in the working capital on which he pursues the business of

eminence.

Parties in the political world do not look far or seek beneath the

surface for their allies. Perhaps they are too busy, or too lazy; not

to suggest that they are too stupid. Anyhow they have a well-defined

leaning towards ready-made reputations: the practice may be expensive

and exacting, but it saves trouble. Once Gastineau had become an

established success his Party found that they could not do without

him, and to that success and to that discovery did a very worthy and

somnolent brewer, whose legislative faculties appeared to be somewhat

clouded by the fumes of his own ale, owe his more comfortable place of

repose in that honourable, if shunted, _wagon-lit_ called the House of

Lords. Eminent forensic lawyers are often failures in Parliament, and

Gastineau was clever enough at the Bar to make wiseacres pretty sure

of his falling short in the House. But the short-sighted soothsayers

who judge the individual from the aggregate had made no allowance for

a certain quality which, beyond his grit, his talent, and his power of

concentration, was to be an important factor in the success which he

forthwith became. They forgot that he was not altogether an Englishman:

there was Southern blood in his veins, a warmer tinge to his mind;

he had the vivacity and intellectual _chic_ of the Italian added to

the determination of an Englishman. So he rose almost at a bound to a

high position among the legal members of the House, and with that his

position seemed assured.

Naturally when it was seen that this distinguished man was among

the victims of the Spanish railway smash, something like a thrill

ran through the country which was the stage of his career. Society

speculated as to the extent of his injuries and his chance of recovery;

his own profession believed, many of them hoped, that, even if he did

recover, his flight would thenceforward be a drooping one, while our

old friend, the man in the street, always ready with an obvious moral

platitude, made much of the impending sword which Fate hangs over the

heads of even the most brilliantly successful of poor humanity.

Meanwhile in a poor monastery near an obscure Spanish town Gastineau

lay battling with characteristic determination to keep at bay Death

who stood over him. When he had been extricated from the wreckage of

the train he was placed aside on the ground to await means of removal

to the improvised hospital; and he had lain there in what, to a man of

his character and ambition, far exceeded the bitterness of death. His

spine was injured, he felt no pain, was, indeed, scarcely conscious of

the strange numbness and deprivation of all muscular power. But, after

the first stunning shock, his mind had become, even for him, abnormally

clear and alert, the change from lethargic dizziness had come like the

clearing off of vapours from the sun. “Thank Heaven,” he muttered to

himself, “this is the end, the lightning before death; if only it will

come quickly, for all is over with me.”

So in a state of savage, resentful impatience he lay there, looking

up at the stars, all unconcerned in their cold glitter, types of the

all-enduring, which mocked that poor transient clay which had aspired

to be a planet in a system so mundane as to admit of railway accidents;

and as he looked with despairing eyes he cursed them as the unjust

rulers of his fate. Then, for his mind was in too great a state of

exaltation to dwell long on any one thought, before him rose and

passed as in an extraordinarily vivid panorama the salient incidents

of his career, to be succeeded by the principal stages he had been

wont justifiably to picture in his future. Never to be. The past was

all he could claim now; the present was mere impotence, and the future

had vanished at the touch of a sleepy signalman’s hand on the wrong

lever. He ground his teeth as he thought of it; he had a good deal of

cynical philosophy in him, but it failed here, the stake had been too

great, the certainty of winning too absolute for him to regard this

startling reverse with equanimity. Then he came to review his triumphs,

his mistakes, his sins: the last had been mostly pleasant, none the

less so, perhaps, that his ambition had required their concealment; he

felt he would rather have lived for sin, flagrant, even, and open,

than died like this. If he had known how near the end was he would not

have been so careful; the world’s opinion, bah! What was it worth now?

Something came to his mind that since the jar of the accident he had

strangely forgotten; something that had sent him there, sent him, as

it turned out, to his death. Was there justice in that? Curiously his

legally trained mind began to busy itself in weighing the equity of

the penalty. It was at least strangely swift, fitting and thorough,

but was it just? _Summum jus, summa injuria._ He smiled resentfully

at the aptness of the adage, then became conscious that some one was

speaking to him, was sympathetically asking as to his hurt. A young

man knelt by his side and, with a cushion, tried to make his position

more comfortable, talking cheerily to him the while. He was one of

the uninjured passengers doing his best for his less fortunate fellow

travellers. For the moment Gastineau hated his succourer in a wave of

malicious envy; why had not this nobody, this worthy, common-place

young Englishman, dull, probably, and mentally circumscribed, with the

hallmark of Eton plainly showing, why had not this man been shattered,

and he, the brilliant worker, with a name and a place in the world,

have gone scatheless? So bitter was the selfish thought that for a

while he could hardly bring himself to acknowledge the young stranger’s

kindness; all he wanted was to be let alone, to die quickly. But the

other was not to be easily rebuffed; perhaps he made allowance for a

sufferer’s state of mind and temper; anyhow he soon won, by tactful

assiduity, the wounded man’s gratitude, to such a degree, indeed,

that when they came to bear Gastineau to the monastery he begged the

young fellow not to leave him. There self came in again, since other

sufferers might need the young Samaritan’s care; but the case seemed

desperate, and he could not bear to refuse a manifestly dying man’s

request.

In such manner began the friendship between Paul Gastineau and Geoffrey

Herriard.

Now, within the next few days, chance, that had brought Gastineau

to this pass, continued a sequel which had a singular and important

bearing upon the future of the two men it had thrown together.

Gastineau, having been carried to the monastery and tended by the

monks, ever ready for such an office of mercy, lay for days in a

semi-comatose condition on the borderland between life and death. He

was but one of some dozen victims under the care of these good brothers

who, simple and practically dead to the world beyond their narrow

sphere, took little heed of their patients’ identities; they were to

them simply suffering men whose pain called forth their loving service.

Presently, to their joy and Herriard’s satisfaction, Gastineau, who had

seemed doomed, began to mend. He regained in a surprising degree his

mental faculties; the doctor shook his head at any idea of complete

recovery; he could never walk again, but, with care till the crisis was

well past, he would live. It was wonderful, wonderful, he declared;

not one man in a thousand would have survived such an injury, but the

vitality of the _Señor Inglese_ was the most marvellous he had ever

known; it was a revelation; and, after all, though most of us die when

we need not, there are some subjects whom it is absurdly difficult to

kill. But then look at him. Did one ever see such unmistakable power in

any one as this dark, resolute Englishman manifested? Were all mankind

built of that steel-like fibre physicians would be few. But to give

him the best chance it would be well to remove him to the air of the

mountains, and the sooner it was done the better.

Accordingly, early one morning, the patient, accompanied by Herriard,

was driven off on a journey of some half-dozen leagues to the

restorative atmosphere the doctor had suggested.

Now it happened that, an hour after their departure, death, as

though determined not to be twice baulked, struck his dart at one of

the patients who remained at the monastery, an Englishman also, a

stockbroker of travelling proclivities whose proposed itinerary had

scarcely included the River Styx. During the morning the reporter of

the local paper, who had, from the columns of a Madrid “contemporary,”

discovered that an Englishman of note was among the wounded (a fact

which he had totally failed to get wind of at first hand), bustled up

to the monastery with an eye to “copy” and the unusual importance of a

series of press telegrams to the capitals of Europe. Only to be told

that the Englishman had died that morning. Too disgusted at a lost

opportunity to enquire more closely as to the identity of the deceased,

he jumped to the conclusion that it was of course the eminent advocate

and distinguished member of the British Parliament who was dead, and

hurried off in sorrow to his office, formulating his dispatch by the

way. So it came to be flashed abroad that Paul Gastineau had, as

expected, succumbed to his injuries.

Herriard reading the news some days after was hot on contradicting it,

and greatly surprised when Gastineau forbade him to do so.

“Let it be,” he commanded. “It is scarcely a mistake. I am dead. Yes;

considering what my life has been, as really dead as many a man who is

in his grave. Let it be so, Herriard; give me your word that you will

not set the mistake right. I will tell you why presently.”

He was so evidently in earnest, that Herriard could not refuse to

pass his word, unaccountable as the request seemed. Yet, perhaps, to

him who, being a humble member of the same profession, knew well his

companion’s position and character therein, it was just conceivable

that this brilliant and ambitious man could not bear to swallow fate’s

nauseous dose in public. If we have to make a wry face we need not

stand in the market-place to do it.

So it came to pass that the report of Gastineau’s death was never

contradicted; he was supposed to have been buried in an obscure Spanish

grave; obituary notices appeared in the papers, and the very fact

that these were allowed to pass unchallenged practically confirmed

their truth. This business of a supposititious death would, however,

have been difficult to carry out successfully had it not been helped

by the circumstance that Gastineau stood, so far as family ties were

concerned, almost alone in the world. There was no near relative to go

out to Spain and make enquiries, even as a pious duty. Such distant

cousins as he had were poor, for he had raised himself; he had never

encouraged any advances they had attempted, and they accepted the news

of his death with little more interest than the rest of the world. So

when presently it appeared that he had left to his friend Geoffrey

Herriard a life interest in his property the relations had scarcely an

excuse for a grievance.

But when once the deception had been decided on, the busy, acute brain,

as keen as ever, set to work strenuously to perfect all the details

of the business. And something more. The hidden light was to burn as

brightly as ever behind its screen of lies; the dead hand was to strike

as viciously as of old, the stilled voice to sting through other lips.

Gastineau studied Herriard and came to the conclusion that he was

fitted for the purpose he had in mind. He could have done with a little

less honesty, but the scheme in its very character contained an element

which would neutralize that. Paul Gastineau was not going to play the

dead man in aught save in name. He was still a power. The sword with

which he had fought and gained so many encounters had snapped in his

hand, but he would do some savage execution yet with the jagged dagger

it had become. He was not going to lie still and impotently watch the

unchecked triumphs of the rivals and enemies he hated and despised. The

sole sharer of his secret was clever, ambitious, sick of waiting for

his chance, and, by Heaven, he should have it.

Accordingly he one day considerably startled Herriard by proposing to

him a scheme, extraordinary enough, yet of obvious feasibility. It was

simply this: That they should return to London secretly, and that he,

Gastineau, out of gratitude for the services rendered him, should repay

service for service by putting the whole of his great talents at his

young friend’s disposal to the furtherance of his career. Herriard, in

a word, was to be the mouthpiece of the stricken man’s brain. Gastineau

should be the dramatist and stage-manager, Herriard the actor, the

manifest form of the invisible spirit.

“I will make you, Geoffrey,” he protested, warming to kindle the

necessary enthusiasm in his intended pupil. “Your fortune at the

Bar, that will be child’s play; I will guarantee for you, if I live,

something higher, a prize more glorious than mere money. Don’t think

of that; leave money-grubbing to tradesmen; more than enough for

everything a man can want will come of course, for you cannot march

successfully through our profession without the accompaniment of the

golden cymbals! But if I take you in hand as I propose, there is no

saying where you will stop. Because I am at the end of my tether,

which has pulled me up with an ugly jerk, because I can do no more for

myself, is no reason why, so long as my brains are left me, I should

not do something for another man. No, don’t begin to thank me; I am not

even pretending that there is any virtue in my offer. If,” he laughed,

“I had still the use of my legs I wouldn’t do it, that’s obvious. I

should be too keen on my own career to trouble much about helping

another man on. I should, if I had completely recovered, have probably

given you a piece of jewellery in acknowledgment of your kindness,

and always been your friend and glad to see you. I am selfish; all

successful men are, although some contrive to disguise it from a stupid

public by advertising the contrary; it has made me; I don’t say I could

not have got on without practising selfishness, but it would have taken

me much longer, and time, you know, is of the essence of our contract

with Fate in these days of hustle, rush and scramble. And it is just

that very instinct of self that now draws me to you; for selfishness by

no means implies ingratitude. Within limits, they who make self their

god are keenly grateful to those who serve in his temple. It is just

as well to be honest in a matter of this kind, and for neither of us to

enter upon a contract such as I am proposing with false impressions.

For it must be a contract, my dear Geoffrey; binding by the very seal

of our individual interests, and to be honourably kept in its spirit as

well as on its material side. It will be necessary for us to believe

in one another, to trust one another. Those are general stipulations:

the only specific conditions I shall make are, absolute, inviolable

secrecy, which you would hardly break, and, what you may find less

easy to comply with, implicit obedience to my instructions. I am not

surprised to see you look serious at that, but don’t misunderstand

me. I am not going to put a knife in your hand and send you forth to

murder one of my pet aversions. I have no intention of asking you to do

anything, to use any weapon which an ordinary man of the world need in

honour, our code of to-day, shrink from. But if I want a man hit hard

you must hit him hard; you will be my soldier, and when I send you out

to fight I don’t expect you to patch up a truce and arbitrate. I have

always been a fighting man, and as my representative, my proxy, you

would have to carry my banner, which bears the motto, ‘No compromise.’

The rewards would be great. If, as I hardly suppose, my affairs should

turn out so that it became necessary for me to levy toll of your

earnings, I would take care you were no loser by that. I will get you

into the House, and what is more, I will make you master of the art of

making your mark there when you are in. That is the real crux. That is

where nine out of ten, even clever, men fail. There need be no limit to

your ambition. Every day’s programme shall be sketched for you, every

wrong turning marked with a red cross, every pitfall fenced, the right

road clearly marked. You shall see your fellow travellers drop off, but

you shall, if you follow my clue, go on triumphantly, each milestone

marking a new success. The world is before you to conquer. The world

consists mainly of fools, but even fools get in your way, it is all

they can do, and there are clever spirits to oppose your progress. The

conquest is easy enough, but unhappily men usually find that out too

late, when they are too old for the fray. I doubt whether you could do

it alone, Geoffrey, at least while the victory is worth having, but

with me behind you, you may be irresistible. Is it a compact?”

The compact was made readily enough, the chances of the strange

proposal being too dazzling to be rejected. If the purely ethical side

of the arrangement lodged a feeble protest in Herriard’s mind, the

material advantage with which it was weighted drove the monitor out of

hearing. Success deferred is to the impatience of youth more galling,

perhaps, than the settled disappointment of failure to a maturer mind.

From Herriard success, the immediate success which a fairly clever and

ambitious man expects to be his, had been withheld to a degree that

had begun to gall him. Other men of his standing, no cleverer but more

pushing, or more lucky, than he, were forging ahead. We are never so

conscious of our slow progress as when we see ourselves left behind by

others who started with us. Here, ready to Herriard’s hand, was a means

of catching up and passing his rivals, indeed of astonishing his world.

It seemed rather like making a compact with the devil, he would tell

himself with a laugh; yet where, he argued, was the wrong? He was going

to rob no one; it was merely a partnership that he was entering into,

and the success of a partnership is gauged by its strongest rather than

its weakest member. Why should a bed-ridden man of genius be debarred

from the active exercise of his mental powers? Where was the dishonour

in being his spokesman, any more than his amanuensis?

So the argument went all one way; the strange partnership began,

and was not long in justifying its existence. Men who frequented

the fruitful and thorny paths of the law began to speak of Geoffrey

Herriard as one of the cleverest of rising counsel; some, speculating

in “futures” out of the capital of their reputation for foresight,

pointed at him as the coming man. He went far to justify them by the

lucky capture of a seat at a bye-election, the victory being in some

measure due to a series of particularly smart and telling speeches,

which tore into shreds the platform of his opponent, a flabby

soap-maker with a long purse and a short vocabulary. Herriard’s maiden

speech was a success. “Best I’ve heard since poor Paul Gastineau,” Sir

Henry Hartfield commented.

“Rather reminds me of him,” his companion remarked. “Something of the

same fiery periods and tendency to antithesis. It just shows how easily

a man’s place can be filled, even the cleverest.”

The resemblance in style was indeed remarkable both at the Bar, on

the platform, and in the House, for in the early day of his pupildom

Herriard had to keep tight and assiduous hold on his master’s hand. The

work was hard, but the tutor was clever in imparting his knack, and,

with a reputation increasing to a flattering degree, the incentive to

industry on the pupil’s part was great.

Every night Herriard paid a visit to the secluded house in Mayfair,

sometimes to stay far into the early hours of the morning, rehearsing

a speech, analyzing the probable trends of a cross-examination, making

notes from Gastineau’s quick observation of weak points or strong

ones, spotting flaws, devising traps, in fact looking to every rivet

in his own armour, speculating on every possible loose joint in his

adversaries’ for the morrow’s tilt.

So the singular conjunction of rare master and apt pupil had continued

in almost unbroken success for more than three years. Herriard

had gained such a degree of confidence in playing his part as now

almost to wear his instructor’s talent at second-hand. He promised

to become a rich man, and Gastineau, with ample means of his own

for his circumscribed luxury, was pleased that it should be so. In

return for wealth and reputation he expected Herriard to mark down,

to follow up and worry certain old-time rivals of his own. His pupil

sometimes marvelled at the malignant viciousness of his “riding

orders.” It was as though Gastineau had given him a rhetorical bottle

of vitriol to fling over the smug face of some self-satisfied prig

of an Under Secretary. Still he felt in honour bound to fling the

corrosive denunciations with the most stinging effect, very much to the

distortion of the Superior Being’s cultivated blandness. Then Gastineau

was wont to declare himself well satisfied; and perfect friendship,

founded on mutual service, existed between the two men.

But strange events, little dreamt of by either, were on their way to

meet them; events which were to turn into disastrous twistings the

paths that had run so easily side by side.

The Master Spirit · 第 2 / 30 章