HOMER AND HESIOD

“Homer and Hesiod created the generations of the gods for the

Greeks; they gave the divinities their names, assigned to them their

prerogatives and functions, and made their forms known.” So Herodotus

describes the service of these poets to the centuries which followed

them.[1] But the modern historian of Greek religion cannot accept

the statement of the father of history as wholly satisfactory; he

knows that the excavations of the last forty years have revealed to

us civilizations of the third and second millenia before Christ, the

Minoan and Mycenaean cultures, of which the historical Greeks were

hardly conscious, but which nevertheless made large contributions to

religion in the period after Homer. Yet at the most the Mycenaean and

Minoan Ages were for the Greek of the sixth and fifth centuries only a

kind of dim background for the remote history of his race. The Homeric

poems represented for him the earliest stage of Hellenic social life

and religion. We are justified, then, in taking the Iliad and Odyssey

as starting points in our present considerations. These matchless epics

cast an ineffable spell over the imaginations of the Greeks themselves

and influenced religion hardly less than literature.

It is obvious that in this course of lectures we cannot consider

together all the multitudinous phases of Greek religion: it will be

impossible to discuss those large primitive elements in the practices

and beliefs of the ancient Greek folk which are so attractive to many

students of religion today, for these things were, by and large, only

survivals from a ruder past and did not contribute to the religious

progress from age to age; nor can we rehearse the details of worship,

or review all the varieties of religious belief which we find in

different places and in successive centuries; still less can we concern

ourselves with mythology. Alluring as these things are they do not

concern our present purpose. I shall invite you rather to trace with

me the development of Greek religious thought through something over a

thousand years, from the period of the Homeric poems to the triumph of

Christianity. In such a survey we must be occupied for the most part

with the larger movements and the higher ranges of Greek thought, with

the advance which was made from century to century; and we shall try

to see how each stage of religious development came to fruition in the

next period. To accomplish this purpose we must take into due account

the social, economic, and political changes in the Greek world which

influenced the course of Hellenic thinking. Ultimately, if our study

is successful, we shall have discovered in some measure, I trust, what

permanent contributions the Greeks made to our own religious ideas.

With these things in mind, therefore, let us return to the Homeric

Poems.

Whatever the date at which the Iliad and the Odyssey received their

final form, the common view that they belong to a period somewhere

between 850 and 700 B.C. is substantially correct. They

represent the culmination of a long period of poetic development

and picture so to speak on one canvas scenes and deeds from many

centuries. Yet the composite life is wrought by poetic art into one

splendid whole, so that the ordinary reader, in antiquity as today,

was unconscious of the variety and contradictions in the poems; only

the analytic mind of the scholar detects the traces of the varied

materials which the epic poet made his own. It is important that we

should realize the fact that the Homeric poems made the impression of a

consistent unity upon the popular mind in antiquity, for the influence

of these epics through the recitations of rhapsodes at great public

festivals and through their use in school was enormous. The statement

of Herodotus, with which I began, was very largely true.

These poems were composed to be recited at the courts of princes in

Ionia for the entertainment of the nobles at the banquet or after the

feast was over. This purpose naturally influenced the poet in depicting

life and religion, for the incidents chosen, the adventures recounted,

all the life represented, of necessity had to be consonant with the

interests and life of the bard’s audience. His lays were for the ears

of men who had not yet lost the consciousness that they were in a new

land, who knew that they were living in stirring times, and who feeling

the spirit of adventure still fresh within them responded joyously to

tales of heroic combat. This fact explains in part why it is that we

find so little that is primitive or savage in Homer. Such elements

were deliberately left out by the bard as unsuited to his audience;

he chose to neglect them, not because of any antagonism toward them,

but because they did not agree with his artistic aim. Again, the

antiquity of the themes, even at the time of composition, made a

freedom and picturesqueness of treatment possible, which a narrative of

contemporaneous events could never have possessed. Furthermore since

the peoples of Ionia, on migrating from the mainland of Greece, had

left behind their sacred places and had carried with them their gods,

severed from their ancient homes, the epic poet could treat religion

with a liberty and could exercise a freedom of selection among the

divinities, could use his poetic imagination to modify forms and to

emphasize certain attributes, as he never could have done if singing

for a people long resident in an ancient home where their gods had been

localized and fixed in character time out of mind. A poet singing of

Hera in the Argolid would have found himself bound by the traditions of

the Heraeum where the goddess had been domiciled from prehistoric time,

but the Homeric bard in Ionia was under no such limitation.

Therefore we find that the Iliad and Odyssey present to us a picture of

life and religion composed of selected elements and so universalized

that it was understood everywhere and at all later times. Exactly as

the Homeric dialect, probably never spoken in any place or period, was

universally comprehended, so the contents of the poems seemed nothing

strange or difficult to audiences in the remotest parts of the Greek

world; in the Greek colonies in Sicily, along the western shores of the

Mediterranean, or on the borders of the Black Sea, the epic tales were

as easily understood as at Delos, Olympia, or Athens.

Yet we have no warrant for using the Homeric poems as sources for

the full history of Greek religion in the ninth and eighth centuries

B.C. We must remember that the epic bard was least of all

composing systematic treatises about religion; on the contrary he

was narrating heroic tales, such as the wrath of Achilles, the death

of Hector and the ransoming of his body, and the return of Odysseus;

he introduced the gods solely as mighty actors in the struggles and

adventures of his mortal heroes. The divinities who play their parts in

the Iliad, for example, were summoned, like the Achaean princes, so to

speak, from many places to take part in the combat before Troy, and in

the Odyssey only those gods appear who are required by the story. In

short, the poet used the gods and religion exactly as he used his other

materials, drawing from a great stock of beliefs and practices that

which suited his tale, disregarding all the rest, and troubling little

about consistency. Homer’s aim, like that of most poets, was primarily

artistic, and least of all didactic.

Furthermore every reader of the Homeric epics is struck by the

freshness of the treatment; indeed, scholars of an earlier day thought

that the Iliad and the Odyssey were the first fruits of European poetic

inspiration. Today we know that Homer represents the culmination of a

long fine of bards, that his artistry was won by effort and was not

simply the incredible inspiration of one untaught; but this knowledge

does not diminish in the slightest degree our appreciation of the

freshness and directness of treatment which that art realized. These

qualities are obtained in part by a freedom from reflection, by a lack

of self-consciousness in the poems. They do not deal with the origin

of the gods, they present no theogonies, any more than they concern

themselves with the descent of man. It is true that Zeus is the son

of Cronos, as Hera is the daughter of Cronos and Rhea, and that it is

said that Zeus drove Cronos beneath the earth and sea, but we have no

account of the rule of the elder gods or of the struggle by which Zeus

won his place. For the epic poet the world of gods, men, and nature

simply is; he does not indulge in speculation himself nor does he make

his heroes debate questions of whence or whither; the living present

with its actions, its struggles, victories, and defeats filled the

compass of the poet’s thought and of his audience’s desire.

The Iliad and the Odyssey then must not be considered as treatises

or as reflective and philosophical works. This elementary point must

be emphasized here, for there is always danger of losing the true

perspective when we are considering a single theme. The poems derive

their great significance for the history of Greek religion from the

fact that through recitations they became the chief popular literature

of Greece, and that from the sixth century they were the basis of

education, as I have already said. Thus they were universally known

and universally influential; they created a common Olympic religion

beside the local religions; and through the individualities which they

gave the gods they fixed the types which poets were to recall and which

artists were to embody in marble or in wood, ivory, and gold at the

centers of the Greek world.

With these facts in mind we may ask what are the nature and

characteristics of the gods in Homer. Excavations have shown us that

the Mycenaean Age had already passed beyond the ruder stages and had

conceived some at least of its divinities in anthropomorphic fashion.

In Homer the gods are frankly made in man’s image. They are beings

larger, wiser, and stronger than mortals; they have a superhuman but

not complete control over nature and mankind. Their chief preëminence

over man lies in this superior power and in the possession of

immortality as well as of that eternal youth and beauty which is

appropriate to immortals. In their veins flows a divine ichor instead

of blood; their food and drink are not the bread and wine which mortals

need. Yet for all this they are hardly more independent of physical

needs than men: they must sleep and eat, and they need the light of

the sun. The passions hold sway over them to such an extent that the

morality of the gods, of Zeus in particular, is distinctly inferior to

that of mortal princes. The divinities can suffer pain and indignities.

Diomedes was able to wound both Aphrodite and Ares, whereat the valiant

god of war bawled out as loud, the poet says, “as nine or ten thousand

men shout in battle,” and fled into the broad heaven to appeal to

Zeus.[2] In the twenty-first book of the Iliad Athena hits Ares in the

neck with a large boundary stone and overthrows him, adding insult

to injury by laughing merrily at the god’s discomfiture; then when

Aphrodite would lead him off groaning, Athena hurries after and with a

blow of her stout hand lays goddess and god prostrate on the ground.[3]

Nor are the gods more just and honorable than men; they are moved by

caprice; and their godhead does not prevent their quarreling or making

up their differences in very human fashion, as the domestic jar between

Zeus and Hera in the first book of the Iliad shows.[4]

Furthermore the Homeric gods are neither omniscient nor omnipotent.

“The gods know all things” is a pious tribute of the poet, but the

narrative shows it to be untrue. In the thirteenth book of the Iliad,

when Zeus is gazing off into Thrace he fails to notice that Poseidon

enters the battle on the plain immediately below him.[5] In the fifth

book of the Odyssey the tables are turned in a sense, for Poseidon

finds that during his absence among the Ethiopians the Olympians have

taken action favorable to Odysseus, whose return the god of the sea

would fain prevent.[6] For nine years Thetis and Eurynome alone among

the gods knew where Hephaestus was concealed: when he had been thrown

from heaven by his mother in shame for his lameness, they hid him in a

grotto where the sound of the stream of Oceanus drowned the noise of

his smithy.[7] Apollo arrives too late to save Rhesus from his fate;[8]

and we are told that in the previous generation Ares was imprisoned by

the giants Otus and Ephialtes in a bronze jar, like an Oriental jinn,

for thirteen months. There he had perished if it had not been for the

friendly aid of Hermes who stole him from his prison.[9] The gods at

times thwart one another’s purposes, and, as we have seen, they may

even be wounded or frightened like human beings.[10] In such ways as

these do the Homeric divinities show their limitations.

Not only can the gods thwart one another, but they are all at times

subject to Fate or Destiny, which, although vaguely conceived by

the poet, is none the less inexorable. It seems usually to be an

impersonal power, although sometimes it is identified with the will

of an indefinite god (δαἰμονος αἶσα) or with that of Zeus

himself (Διὸς αἶσα). It was fated that Sarpedon, the son of

Zeus, should die, and Zeus, in spite of his grief, yielded him up to

his doom, not because he could not have opposed Fate successfully,

but because he feared that other divinities would wish to save their

children if he saved his.[11] Yet in the Odyssey Athena disguised as

Mentor declares to Telemachus that not even the gods can save a man

they love whenever the fatal doom of death lays hold on him.[12] So

naturally inconsistent is the poet, for in his day men had not reached

the stage where they could form any adequate notion of unity in the

world. Fate therefore is not conceived to be an inexorable power which

is constantly operative, as we find it represented at a later time

among the Greeks and among the Romans, notably in Virgil.

At times we find a more or less fatalistic view of life, Fate being

conceived as a destiny fixed at birth, for the notion that the thread

of life was spun already existed. So Hecuba, wailing for her son, cries

that mighty Fate spun Hector’s doom at the hour she gave him birth;[13]

and Alcinous declares that under Phaeacian escort Odysseus shall reach

his home, but that there he will suffer all that Fate and the cruel

spinsters spun for him when his mother bore him.[14] This fatalism is

most clearly expressed in passages such as that where Odysseus on

Circe’s isle cheers his companions by reminding them that they shall

not enter the house of Hades until their fated day shall come,[15] and

especially in those lines in which Hector comforts his wife Andromache

who would have restrained his impetuous desire for battle:[16] “My good

wife, grieve not overmuch for me in thy heart, for no man shall send

me to Hades contrary to my fate; and I say that none, be he a coward

or brave, has ever escaped his doom, when once it comes.” Still the

Homeric bard had not arrived at any consistent view of destiny; he

gave utterance to that feeling which men had vaguely then as now, that

beyond all lies something fixed and invariable to which all things and

beings are ultimately subject.

As we have seen, the divinities may work at cross purposes; there is

nothing in the Homeric poems like monotheism or pantheism in any true

sense. When the Homeric man said that a thing happened “with god’s

help,” he was simply recognizing the agency of the gods in everything.

Not knowing the special divinity concerned, he left him nameless;

least of all had he any concept of a complete divine polity. There

is, therefore, no such thing in the epics as a divine providence in

the way of a definite purpose or plan such as we shall later find in

the fifth century. Like mortals the Homeric gods discuss their plans,

without being able to see the end from the beginning; they are moved

by caprice, so that Zeus changes sides twice on the second day of the

great battle between the Achaeans and Trojans.[17] The vacillating and

capricious character of the gods is not offset by the protection that

a divinity may give a favorite, such as Athena gave to Odysseus in his

long wanderings and on his return to Ithaca. Throughout both poems we

find the assumption constantly held that every blessing comes from the

gods, that they give every distinction. In like fashion men believed

that all misfortunes were due to divine anger or hostility. So Odysseus

was kept from home for nearly ten years by Poseidon’s hate; the favor

of Athena toward the Achaeans turned to wrath because of the violence

done her shrine in the sack of Troy so that she caused an evil return

for her former favorites. Indeed in misfortune the Homeric hero’s

first question was as to what god he had offended. The problem of evil

therefore was a simple one—all depended on the will or whim of some

divinity.

But there are other things which we should note with regard to these

divinities. As has been said, they are universalized, not attached

to definite localities; in fact the epics contain few traces of that

localization which was the rule in the common religion of Greece.

Although Hera declares:[18] “Verily three cities there are most dear to

me, Argos and Sparta and broad-streeted Mycenae,” she is in no sense

regarded as bound to these localities. In Demodocus’ song of the love

of Ares and Aphrodite it is said that when released from the bonds in

which Hephaestus had ensnared them, the god of war fled to Thrace and

laughter-loving Aphrodite to Paphos in Cyprus,[19] but these places

are not their homes in any strict sense. And so with the other gods.

The Olympians are rather free, universal divinities, unhampered by

local attachments. Olympus itself is in the upper heaven more than in

Thessaly. It is of course true that lesser divinities, like river-gods

and mountain-nymphs, are localized, but these beings have little

influence on the affairs of men.

Let us now consider briefly the most important Homeric gods. At the

head of the divine order stands Zeus, “father of gods and of men”

(πατὴρ ἀνδρῶν τε θεῶν τε), “most exalted of rulers” (ὔπατε κρειόντων),

“most glorious and most mighty” (κύδιστε μέγιστε), as he is called.[20]

To him the elements are subject and at his nod great Olympus trembles.

He is the guardian of oaths, the protector of the stranger and the

suppliant. Famed for his prowess and might he never in person enters

battle, but indirectly he takes a hand in the strife between the Greeks

and the Trojans. Although he surpasses all in wisdom and power, at

times he is outwitted by other divinities. Like a mortal chieftain

he presides at council on Olympus in his great hall, whither he may

on occasion summon the divinities of every class to attend a general

assembly.[21] Olympus indeed is conceived as loosely organized after

the fashion of an aristocratic state with Zeus as chief (βασιλεύς),

the Olympians as members of the council (βουλή), and the whole body of

minor divinities as making up the assembly (ἀγορή).

Hera, the queen of Olympus, is at once both sister and wife of Zeus;

they are the only wedded pair on Olympus. She belongs, however,

distinctly to the second class of Olympians. She takes no part in

the Odyssey; and in the Iliad, although she favors the Achaeans most

vehemently, she is less active than Athena. In character she is a good

deal of a scold, so that Zeus fears her jealous anger.[22] He knows that

she is accustomed to block his plans, although on one occasion he had

punished her by stringing her up by the wrists and tying anvils to her

feet! Of this he indignantly reminds her: “Dost thou not remember

when I strung thee up aloft and from thy feet I hung two anvils, and

round thy wrists I bound a golden bond unbreakable? And thou wast hung

in the upper air and the clouds. Wroth were the gods throughout high

Olympus, but still they could not approach and free thee.”[23] Again he

had beaten her, and when Hephaestus tried to intervene, Zeus seized the

meddler by the foot and threw him out of Olympus. Hephaestus himself

recalls the experience: “All the day long I fell and at setting of the

sun I dropped in Lemnos, and there was little life left in me.”[24]

Athena is above all the goddess of war, and she plays a large part

in both the Iliad and Odyssey. In the latter poem she is the special

guardian of Odysseus, whose ready mind wins her admiration. She is

also the most skilled of all divinities, the patroness of every

handicraft.[25] She is perhaps the chief divinity of Troy; on the Trojan

citadel stands her temple to which the noble matrons bring a gift of a

beautiful robe with the promise of generous sacrifice if the goddess

will give them her protection against Diomedes.[26] She also has a home

on the acropolis at Athens.[27]

Apollo, the archer god, is a patron of war and of bowmen. In the Iliad

he is a violent enemy of the Achaeans and gives most effective aid

to the Trojans; but in the Odyssey he plays no active part. He also

inspires seers and prophets; and he is the god of the lyre and the

teacher of bards. In prayers he is named with Zeus and Athena when an

object is most earnestly desired.[28]

These three are the greatest of the Homeric divinities, although there

is no close connection among them. Apollo’s virgin sister, Artemis,

plays a part much inferior to that of her brother, but in many ways she

is similar to him. Her arrows bring a quick and peaceful end to women

as Apollo’s do to men. In the chase she is preëminent: she is the fair

goddess of wood and mountain.

Ares and Aphrodite also belong to a lower rank. In function they

are limited to an appeal to a single passion each, Ares to rage for

slaughter, Aphrodite to the passion of love. They are both treated with

a certain contempt and are mocked by the other gods.

Hephaestus is the god of fire, the lame craftsman of Olympus. It was

he who built the homes of the gods; but his skill was especially shown

in the wondrous works he wrought in gold and silver. Such were the

mixing-bowl which Phaedimus, the Sidonian king, gave to Menelaus;[29]

wonderful automata, twenty golden tripods, which on occasion would go

of their own accord to the assemblage of the gods and then return;[30]

or the gold and silver dogs which guarded the palace of Alcinous.[31]

Still more marvellous were the golden maidens endowed with reason,

speech, and cunning knowledge, which supported their maker as he limped

from his forge to his chair;[32] and above all the splendid armor

wrought for Achilles.[33]

Poseidon, the brother of Zeus, has as his special province the sea;

but he appears on Olympus at the councils of the gods. In the Iliad he

supports the Achaeans vigorously; no doubt from anger at the Trojans

whose king Laomedon had once cheated him of the pay which was his

due for building the walls of Troy;[34] in the Odyssey, angry at the

blinding of his son, Polyphemus, he holds Odysseus far from Ithaca,

until at last the Phaeacians bring him home. Then in wrath he turns

their vessel into stone.[35]

Such in brief are the eight great gods of the Homeric poems. Of these

Zeus is easily the first, but in the first rank also are Athena and

Apollo; Hera and Poseidon hold a second place; and Hephaestus, Ares,

and Aphrodite belong to the third class. Many other divinities there

are, but all of lesser rank, like Hermes whose duties are those of a

higher servant or messenger. He is sent to escort King Priam to the

tent of Achilles to ransom Hector’s body,[36] and he is despatched

to Calypso’s isle to bid her let Odysseus go.[37] There are some

indications that he is already the patron of thieves, as he is of

servants. Dionysus and Demeter, so prominent in later Greece, have not

yet won a place in the Olympic circle. There is no hint in the epics of

the mysteries and the orgiastic cults which were afterwards of great

significance. Hades, the brother of Zeus and Poseidon, holds as his

realm the dark abode of the dead, where he reigns with Persephone as

queen. His murky kingdom is now represented as beneath the earth, again

as far out on the bounds of Oceanus. But Hades takes no active part in

either poem.

Besides these there is a host of divinities, some named but most

unnamed, who cause all the phenomena of the visible world. In fact,

the Homeric man could not conceive of a natural world obeying laws

whose operation was fixed; on the contrary, he could only think of

animated beings as the causes of all events. For him every occurrence

was the manifestation of the will of some divinity; the natural and the

miraculous were one.

It is evident from this hasty review of the Homeric gods that we

have in the epics no complete and fully organized pantheon. Zeus is

regarded as supreme but he is thwarted and outwitted by lesser members

of the Olympic circle, even as they block one another. In fact Homer’s

view of the gods abounds in contradictions of which however only the

scholar and the critic have ever been very conscious. From our modern

standpoint we notice the moral inconsistencies above all. Although Zeus

is the guardian of justice, he is deceitful and treacherous if occasion

arises, as when at the request of Thetis he sends a delusive dream to

Agamemnon to urge him to give battle, in spite of the fact that he

cannot be successful.[38] It is Zeus also who is responsible for the

faithless breaking of the truce between the Achaeans and Trojans[39];

and many other instances might be cited to illustrate his utter

untrustworthiness. On his lack of domestic morality I need hardly dwell.

Yet we must remind ourselves that to the Homeric Age there was

little connection, if any, between morals and religion. Religion is

concerned with man’s relation to the gods, morality with his relation

to his fellow men. Morality is therefore developed through the social

relations first of all, and only later is brought into relation to

religion. In Homer the sense of social obligations is much more keenly

realized than is that of religious sanctions. The cardinal virtues are

bravery, wisdom, love of home and family, and regard for hospitality.

In a life of action, filled with war, bravery is of prime importance;

by it wealth, power, and honor are won. Proper to such a life are

practical wisdom and even cunning. The highest praise is to be called

“first in council and first in battle.”[40] Agamemnon is lauded by Helen

as “both a good king and a mighty warrior.”[41] The standing epithets

of Odysseus, “very crafty” (πολύμητις) and “the man of many devices”

(πολυμήχανος), show the qualities which were deemed praiseworthy.

Yet Odysseus had won this distinction by his skill in lying and

deceiving—practices still deemed highly laudable in our own world if

employed against a foe, or sometimes even when used as acts of caution.

Yet if our modern views do not wholly coincide with the ancient on

these points, we can feel only admiration for the regard for home and

family, the unselfish generosity, and the universal hospitality toward

strangers which the epic heroes display.

The poems also set a high value on personal honor. The outrage done

Menelaus by Paris, who violated the most sacred laws of hospitality

by carrying away his host’s wife, was the whole cause of the Trojan

War. To avenge this outrage all the princes of the Achaeans rallied

as if the wrong suffered had been their own. Agamemnon’s high-handed

act in taking the captive Briseis from Achilles roused that wrath

which is the first word of the Iliad. The Odyssey is the epic of a

personal will which, triumphing over all disasters, finally wreaked

a terrible vengeance on the insolent suitors who had wooed Odysseus’

wife, devoured his substance, plotted against his son, and at the end

shamefully insulted Odysseus himself. The punishment of the suitors

is the victory of justice over lawlessness, and possesses a moral

significance which was not lost on antiquity.

In what I have just been saying I have already implied that man’s

relation to the gods was not ethical but ritualistic. We must

remember that when we speak of “sin” or a “consciousness of guilt,”

we are presupposing a self-conscious and self-searching individual.

This the Homeric man was not; on the contrary he was in the highest

degree natural, unreflective, and unconscious of self. In fact the

Homeric concept of sin touches our moral ideas at hardly more than

three points. Disregard for an oath, failure to honor one’s father

and mother, and disrespect for the stranger and suppliant were high

offenses against heaven and brought down divine wrath on the

transgressor. But in general sin is failure to recognize man’s absolute

dependence on the immortals, to give them due honor, to pay them proper

sacrifice, and to walk humbly on the earth. Sacrifice is tribute

whereby man acquires merit with divinity; of such meritorious credit

the priest Chryses reminds Apollo in his prayer at the beginning of

the Iliad:[42] “Hear me, Lord of the silver bow, ... if ever I have

roofed over a temple pleasing to thee, or if ever I have burnt in thy

honor fat thighs of bulls or of goats, then accomplish this my prayer.”

Agamemnon in the stress of battle reproaches Zeus for bringing his

present disaster upon him in spite of the fact that he made sacrifice

on every altar as he hurried to Ilion;[43] and many other illustrations

might be cited. Failure to make due offering might bring serious

disaster. Menelaus, on his way home from Troy, omitted sacrifice before

leaving Egypt; so he was forced to return from the island of Pharos and

repair his failure, after which he accomplished his voyage easily.[44]

When Oeneus neglected Artemis, she sent the Calydonian boar to afflict

his land: “Artemis of the golden throne sent a plague upon them, angry

that Oeneus did not offer her the first fruits of his rich land. All

the other gods had their feast of hecatombs, and only to the daughter

of mighty Zeus did he fail to make offering, whether he forgot or had

no thought of the matter. But he showed great folly in his soul.”[45]

Again the plague sent by Apollo on the Achaean host before Troy suggests

to Achilles that the god may be angered at a failure to perform some

vow or to offer a hecatomb.[46] It is little wonder that the enlightened

Plato felt horror and disgust at such notions as these and that he

condemned this kind of worship as an “art of trafficking” (ἐμπορικὴ

τέχνη).[47] Still this Homeric idea of the relations between men

and gods—an idea which has not wholly disappeared from the world

today—rests on the notion that gods and men belong to one common

society in which the obligations are binding on both sides.

Especially to be avoided was insolent pride; man must not boast himself

overmuch; there were fixed bounds set for him which he might not

transgress. So Ajax met his fate because of his insolent defiance:

“Even so he had escaped his doom, hateful though he was to Athena, if

he had not let fall an insolent speech and committed great folly. He

said that in spite of the gods he had escaped the great gulf of the

sea; but Poseidon heard his loud boasting. Straightway then he took his

trident in his mighty hands and struck the Gyraean rock and cleft it in

twain. Part remained in its place, but a portion fell in the deep, that

part on which Ajax first sat and uttered his great folly; but it now

bore him down beneath the vast billowy sea.”[48] But Achilles showed

the approved attitude of mind when he thus addressed the dead Hector:

“Lie now dead; but my doom I will accept whenever it please Zeus and

the other immortal gods to send it.”[49] This fear of punishment from

heaven, of that which Aeschylus and Herodotus call “the envy of the

gods,” long operated to keep in check excess of speech and added no

doubt to the comfort of Greek society. Of magic whereby man can compel

the gods there is nothing in Homer; the inferiority of mortals to the

immortals is complete.

We may now properly consider the Homeric view of life after death.

The epic psychology made no sharp distinction between the soul and

the body; on the whole the body was identified with the self rather

than the soul (ψυχή), which goes to the realm of Hades when the man is

dead. There in the world of shadows beneath the earth or far out by the

stream of Oceanus the shades, pale images of the men who were, exist;

they do not live. The pathetic plaints of the shades that come up to

Odysseus in the eleventh book of the Odyssey show how hopeless is their

lot. Though Orion pursue the wild beasts over the cheerless plains of

asphodel and Minos hold his golden staff and sit in judgment over the

dead, yet all is insubstantial and far less than life. The often quoted

words of Achilles’ shade sum up the whole matter: “Speak not to me of

death, glorious Odysseus. For so I might be on earth, I would rather be

the servant of another, of a poor man who had little substance, than to

be lord over all the dead.”[50]

There is no system of future punishment or rewards, although a few

individuals have won supreme suffering like Tityus, Sisyphus, and

Tantalus or gained high station like Minos, the judge. Therefore beyond

the grave there was for the Homeric man no hope, no satisfaction. Only

here under the light of the sun and in the glory of action could the

epic hero find his joy. This is, in no small measure, the cause of

that pathos which strikes us occasionally in the poems. Man is spoken

of as the most pitiful of creatures, the feeblest of all beings which

the earth nourishes. Evil and suffering sent by the gods are his lot,

unrelieved by any prospect of the future.[51]

Let us now summarize briefly the matter we have thus far been

considering together. As I said at the beginning of this lecture,

religion in the Homeric poems shows the influence of the conditions

under which the poems were composed. Intended for Ionian princes of

Asia Minor, emigrants who had lost the support which local attachment

always gives, the Iliad and Odyssey present those traits of religion

which were everywhere understood and which made a universal appeal.

Therefore the Homeric gods have a synthetic character; they are,

as has been aptly said, “composite photographs” of local Zeus’s,

Apollos, Athenas, and so on. Again since the epics were intended for

entertainment, the gods are represented not as remote, but human and

real; they have characters and personalities which local divinities

did not possess. In picturing them as more human, in rehearsing their

quarrels, intrigues, passions, and even physical peculiarities, the

poet not only amused his carefree audience, but brought the gods closer

to men; he made them more comfortable creatures to live with, even if

they were moved by whims and fancies. Their worship was sacrifice

associated with the banquet which men and gods shared in common

fellowship; the gods were thought to wish man’s offerings and service

just as man desired communion with them. Malevolent divinities, daemons

of the earth, rites of riddance by which man seeks to avert the wrath

of some spiteful or angry being, all the great mass of practices

unquestionably common to the folk-religion of the age, were for the

most part omitted by the poet as unsuited or uninteresting to his

aristocratic audience. There is almost nothing bearing on the cult of

the dead save possibly in connection with the funeral of Patroclus;

incantation proper is mentioned only once; and Circe’s potent herbs by

which she transformed Odysseus’s companions into beasts, like Circe

herself, belong to fairyland. The Homeric religion, therefore, is

largely a social religion of this world, of sunlight and of action.

Yet if Homer’s gods are human, they are still impressive; they have the

dignity which comes from unchanging age and superhuman power; they are

conceived in the grand way. So true was this that as the Homeric poems

became popular literature, studied in school and known to all men, they

created a universal religion. They also influenced the types under

which the Greek artists represented their great gods. Tradition says

that when Phidias was asked by his associate Panaenus what type he had

selected for his Zeus at Olympia, he replied with Homer’s lines: “The

son of Cronos spoke and nodded under his dark brows; and the ambrosial

locks of the king fell down from his immortal head, and he shook great

Olympus.”[52] Such was the effect of this statue after it had stood for

five centuries and a half that the orator Dio Chrysostom said of it:

“Whoever among mankind is wholly weary in soul, whoever has experienced

many misfortunes and sorrows in life, and may not find sweet sleep,

he, methinks, if he stood before this statue, would forget all the

calamities and griefs that come in the life of man.”[53]

We must, however, recognize that the spiritual contribution of the

Homeric poems to later Greece was inevitably less than the artistic. No

inspired bard was needed to teach the lessons of man’s inferiority to

the gods and of his dependence on them, although these are constantly

emphasized; yet the epics also inculcate the necessity of moderation

in act and speech; and they teach that Zeus is the guardian of oaths

and of hospitality. Furthermore they express the half-realized belief

that Zeus is the protector of all justice; and they bring home the

fact that the individual must pay for his sin, however he may have

been led into it. But the greatest contribution which the poems made

to later religious thought was paradoxically due to the fact that they

made their gods so thoroughly human, for it inevitably followed in due

season that the gods were measured by the same standards of right and

wrong that were applied to men. This eventually ennobled man’s concept

of divinity, so that he required of the gods a perfection to match

their immortal nature.

Herodotus names Homer and Hesiod together as the great theological

teachers of Greece. But when we compare the later poet with the

earlier we find a marked contrast between them. Homer looks backward

to an earlier day; his poems reflect the glory of that splendid age

when the Achaean princes, like Agamemnon in golden Mycenae, ruled at

home in power, or on the plains of Troy contended with divine and

human foes. Homer is aristocratic, universal, objective, with little

self-consciousness, hardly concerned with the origins of gods and men

or with the possible goals toward which the world was moving. Hesiod

was the son of a farmer, who according to tradition had come from Cyme

in Asia Minor to Boeotian Ascra which lay on a spur of the range of

Helicon near a shrine of the Muses. When Hesiod wrote, the land had

felt the exhaustion of war, the coming of ruder tribes from the north

and west had swamped the earlier civilization, and both noble and

peasant were finding life harder. These conditions are reflected in the

Hesiodic poetry: it deals with fact rather than fancy; for the splendid

dramatic deeds of men and gods it substitutes homely adage, reasoned

reflection, and moral tale. Hesiod is self-conscious and reflective. He

uses the first person, whereas Homer never names himself. A dour son

of the soil, born in gloomy days, he is the first writer of Europe to

speak for the common man.

The two chief poems which bear the name of Hesiod are the Theogony and

the Works and Days. The former deals with the origin of the world and

the generations of the gods. It is an attempt to bring order into

current myths by sifting and arranging them into a system. The material

Hesiod found ready to his hand; his task was to systematize and set

it forth to his audience. The Theogony is the first extant work of

European literature to present the idea that dynasties of the gods have

succeeded each other in time, the rule of Uranus giving way to the sway

of Cronos, who in his turn was displaced by Zeus. We have seen that

Homer did not concern himself about such matters as these; that only

vague references to such ideas are found in the Iliad and Odyssey.

Hesiod, however, represents another age and another aspect of the Greek

mind, a desire to bring harmony into the varied and inconsistent tales

of current mythology and thus in a way to render the gods intelligible

to men.

The gods of the Theogony are hardly moral beings; on the contrary much

of the theology there presented is far ruder than that of the Iliad and

Odyssey. Some of the tales are on the level of primitive mythology,

such as the account of the way in which earth and heaven were separated

and of the manner in which the earth was fertilized; others retain

more offensive elements like that of Cronos devouring his children,

or of Zeus swallowing his wife Metis when she was about to give birth

to Athena, for it was fated that her child should be the equal of its

father in wit and cunning. In general the poet gives no sign of being

conscious that this work might have moral or religious significance.

The word justice (δίκη), which is so frequent in the Works and Days,

occurs but twice in the Theogony. The wives of Zeus are in succession

Wisdom (Μῆτις) and Right (Θέμις), but his constant attendants

are Violence (Κράτος) and Force (Βίη). In neither case, however,

is any moral conclusion drawn therefrom. The only beings to whom

moral functions are assigned are the Fates, “Goddesses who visit

transgressions of men and gods and never cease from their fearful wrath

until they have inflicted dire punishment on the sinner.”[54] Save for

this passage and one in which the punishment of the gods for perjury

is described, the Theogony is less ethical than even the Iliad and

Odyssey, for they have regard for certain social sanctions. The work

is nevertheless significant and requires notice here because it bears

witness to the critical mind that set the myths in order, and because

it shows that the age of Hesiod was a reflective one.

Hesiod’s other poem, the Works and Days, is of high moral import. It

owes its title to the fact that it gives directions for various kinds

of occupations and that it also contains a kind of peasant’s calendar.

By bribing his judges the poet’s brother Perses had deprived the poet

of the inheritance which was properly his. To this unjust brother

Hesiod addresses his poem, but he rises constantly from the particular

case to general moral considerations; indeed the poet’s ethical lessons

gain in force because they start with a personal application.

Work, justice, right social relations, and piety toward the gods are

the cardinal themes of the Works and Days. At the very opening of the

poem Hesiod points out that there are two kinds of Strife or Rivalry

on earth, the one good and praiseworthy, the other evil. Evil strife

leads to war and to discord, but the good, implanted by Zeus in the

very order of things, ever urges men on to work. Hesiod delights in

emphasizing the value of toil; he has given enduring expression to the

natural dignity of labor in the verse,

Εργον δ' οὐδὲν ὂνειδος, ἀεργίη δέ τ' ὂνειδος.

The Religious Thought of the Greeks, from Homer to the Triumph of Christianity · 第 7 / 54 题