H. & M.

* * * * *

PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY,

_New York, October 28, 1853_.

GENTLEMEN: Having examined carefully the schedule proposed by you for

running on the route between New Orleans and Vera Cruz, so as to connect

at Acapulco with our steamers between Panama and San Francisco, I beg

leave to inform you that it meets our approval.

When our company commenced to run weekly boats, the schedule of the

Texas was arranged to conform to the movements of those extra boats.

It happened, however, that the United States Mail Steamship Company,

although willing to perform extra service, and to let that service speak

for itself to Congress, was not willing to bind itself as the government

required, so as to shut out all prospect of extra remuneration by a

liberal legislature for extra duty; and, consequently, the steamers, on

intermediate weeks, on this side, were withdrawn. The connexion being

thus cut off, our company was obliged to discontinue its weekly trips,

after the schedule of the Vera Cruz and Acapulco route had been arranged

to conform to those trips.

My understanding with Mr. Rankin is, that when the route is fairly

opened, we will run steamers in the Pacific in due connexion; and I am

prepared to assign this duty to two of our smaller first-class steamers

the moment I am justified in so doing. Until then, the merits of the

route can be tested by arranging a schedule to conform to the arrivals

at Acapulco, and, as far as possible, to the departures thence for

San Francisco of our steamers now running; and the interests of the

government and of the public unite in recommending such a course.

Very truly, yours,

WM. H. ASPINWALL, _President_.

Messrs. HARRIS & MORGAN.

* * * * *

POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT,

_November 3, 1853_.

GENTLEMEN: In answer to your letter of the 26th ultimo, I have to

state that, at the request of Mr. Carmick, the contractor, the present

schedule of the New Orleans and Vera Cruz route was arranged to connect

with the contemplated route across from Vera Cruz to Acapulco, which

it was proposed to run in due connexion with an independent line of

steamers between Acapulco and San Francisco—thus, with the route via

Panama, giving a mail four times, instead of twice a month, between the

Atlantic States and California. It was not the intention to connect at

Acapulco with the steamers of the Panama line, but, as above remarked,

to establish an additional semi-monthly mail to run, via Vera Cruz and

Acapulco, alternately at regular intervals with the line via Panama.

This arrangement was made with my predecessor, Mr. Hubbard, with whom,

as Postmaster General, also a conditional contract was entered into

for the part of the service between Vera Cruz and San Francisco, which

contract was to take effect _only from the time it should be ratified

by Congress_; nor was it to have any force or validity whatever until

it should receive the sanction of Congress by the passage of an

appropriation to carry it into effect. No such sanction has as yet been

given by Congress; but, apart from this, and without troubling you with

my views on the whole subject, it is simply necessary for me to say that

there can be no recognition by this department of any arrangement by

which the additional semi-monthly mail, clearly contemplated by the then

Postmaster General, can be dispensed with.

The application, therefore, for a change of schedule on the route from

New Orleans to Vera Cruz, must now be considered without reference to

any trips it may be proposed to run in connexion therewith beyond. The

contract requires three trips a month; you propose but two, and it is

unnecessary for me to say that the number of trips stipulated for in the

contract will be required.

Ramsey & Carmick, contract. Letter from the Postmaster General transmitting copy of a conditional mail contract; also copies of correspondence relative to the same · 第 16 / 27 题