III. THE SMALLER COLLECTIONS.

The =other collections= at the Louvre appeal for the most part rather to

the =specialist= than to the general public. They are for workers, not

for sight-seers. The =Egyptian Museum=, for example, to the L as you

enter the Cour du Louvre by the main entrance, contains, perhaps, the

finest collection of its sort in all Europe. You must, of course, at

least walk through it—especially if you have not seen the British

Museum. The objects, however, are sufficiently indicated for casual

visitors by means of the labels; they need not be enumerated. The

opposite wing, to the R as you enter, contains the =Assyrian

Collection=, inferior on the whole, especially in its bas-reliefs, to

that in the British Museum. Beyond it, again, to the left, lie a group

of rooms devoted to the =intermediate region= between the sphere of

=Assyrian and Greek art=. These rooms ought certainly to be examined by

any who wish to form some idea of the origin and development of Hellenic

culture. The first two rooms of the suite contain =Phœnician=

works,—important because the Phœnicians were the precursors of the

Greeks in navigation and commerce in the Mediterranean, and because

early Greek art was largely based on Phœnician imitations of Assyrian

and Egyptian work, or on actual Egyptian and Assyrian objects imported

into Hellas by Phœnician merchants. These Semitic seafarers had no

indigenous art of their own; but they acted as brokers between East and

West, and they skilfully copied and imitated the principal art-products

of the two great civilisations on whose confines they lay, though often

without really understanding their true import. The Phœnicians were thus

the pioneers of civilisation in the Eastern Mediterranean.

=Room= IV, beyond these two, contains more Phœnician antiquities, and

others from =Cyprus=, an island inhabited by Greeks or half Greeks, but

one in which this imported Oriental culture earliest took root and

produced native imitations. Examine these objects as leading up to, and

finally correcting, the _archaic_ Greek work ill represented by a few

objects in the Salle de Phidias. The =Salle de Milet=, beyond, contains

Greek antiquities from =Asia Minor=, some of which indicate transition

from the Assyrian to the Hellenic type. Examine these from the point of

view of development. The reliefs from the temple of Assos in Mysia show

an early stage in the evolution of Asiatic Greek art. Compare them with

the archaic objects in the Salle de Phidias. It must be borne in mind

that civilised art entered Greece from Assyria, by way of Phœnicia, the

Hittites, Lydia, Phrygia, the Ionian cities in Asia Minor, and the

Islands of the Archipelago. These intermediate rooms should therefore be

studied in detail from this point of view, dates and places being

carefully noted, as illustrating the westward march of art from Nineveh

to Athens. The last hall of the suite, the =Salle de Magnésie=, on the

other hand, contains works from =Ephesus= of a late Greek period,

representing rather a slight barbaric deterioration than a transitional

stage. These collections, most important to the student of Hellenic

culture, may be neglected by hurried or casual visitors.

The =Salle Judaïque=, to the right, under the stairs, contains the

scanty remains of the essentially inartistic Jewish people, interesting

chiefly from the point of view of Biblical history. The famous and

much-debated =Moabite Stone=, recording the battles of King Mesa of Moab

with the Jews in B.C. 896, is here preserved. It is believed to be the

earliest existing specimen of alphabetic as opposed to hieroglyphic or

ideographic writing.

There is, however, one group of objects in the Louvre, too seldom

visited, which no one should omit to inspect if time permits him. This

is the admirable =**=Dieulafoy Collection of =Persian Antiquities=. To

arrive at it, go to the front of the Old Louvre, facing St. Germain

l’Auxerrois, as for the previously noted series. Enter by the principal

portal, and turn to the R, through the Assyrian collection, whose winged

bulls and reliefs of kings you may now inspect in passing, if you have

not done so previously. Mount the staircase at the end, and, at the

landing on the top, turn to your L, when you will find yourself at once

face to face with the collection.

The =First Room= contains merely Græco-Babylonian objects (of a

different collection) which need only be inspected by those whose

leisure is ample. They illustrate chiefly the effect of Hellenic

influence on Asiatic models. On the entrance wall of the =Second Room=

is the magnificent =*Frieze of Archers= of the Immortal Guard, in

encaustic tiles, with cuneiform inscriptions, from the Throne Room of

Darius I. This splendid work, mere fragment though it is of the

original, gives in its colour and decorative detail some idea of the

splendour of the Palace of the Persian monarchs. The colours are those

still so prevalent in Persian art, showing a strong predominance of

blues and greens, with faint tones of yellow, over red and purple, which

latter, indeed, are hardly present. Round the rest of the walls are

ranged decorative fragments from the Palace of Artaxerxes Mnemon.

Opposite the archers is another magnificent frieze of =angry lions=,

from the summit of the portals in the last-named palace. The next

compartment of the same room contains the =*Base of a Column= and a

=**Capital= of the same, also from the Palace of Artaxerxes Mnemon:—two

figures of bulls supporting between them the enormous wooden rafters of

the ceiling. These gigantic and magnificent figures form perhaps the

most effective and adequate supports for a great weight to be found in

any school of architecture.

The next room contains the admirable =reconstruction= of the Palace,

when entire, showing the position on the walls of either pylon, and the

manner in which the columns supported the colossal roof. If, from

inspection of this model, we return to the base and capitals themselves,

we shall be able to judge what must have been the magnificent and

gigantic scale of this Titanic building, the effect of which must have

thrown even the Temple of Karnac into the shade. At the side are a

=lion= and =winged bull=, which help to complete the mental picture.

This collection, unique in Europe, serves to give one an idea of the

early =Persian civilisation= which can nowhere else be obtained, and

which helps to correct the somewhat one-sided idea derived from the

accounts of Greek historians. On no account should you miss it.

The =minor art-objects= of the Louvre, though of immense value and

interest in themselves, may be largely examined by those who have the

time in the light of their previous work at Cluny. The collection of

=drawings=, one of the finest in Europe, is mostly interesting to

artists. That of =smaller Mediæval and Renaissance Objects= contains

works closely similar to those at Cluny, including admirable

=ivory-carvings=, fine =pottery= (the best of which is that by

=Palissy=, and the =Henri II ware=), together with Oriental faïence,

bronzes, etc. The =Greek Vases=, again, of which this Museum contains a

magnificent collection, are mainly interesting to Hellenic specialists.

For the casual visitor, it will suffice to examine one or two of them.

The =Etruscan Antiquities= give a good idea of the civilisation of this

ancient race, from which, both in earlier and later times, almost all

the art, poetry, and science of Italy has proceeded. Though entirely

based upon Greek models, the Etruscan productions betray high artistic

faculty and great receptive powers of intellect. Among the =minor Greek

works=, none are more interesting than the beautiful little terra-cotta

=figures= from =Tanagra= in Bœotia, which cast an unexpected light on

one side of Greek art and culture. Examine them as supplementing the

collection of antique sculpture. These =figurines=, as they are called,

were produced in immense quantities, chiefly in Bœotia, both for

household decoration and to be buried with the dead. They were first

moulded or cast in clay, but they were afterwards finished by hand, with

the addition of just such accessories or modifications as we have seen

to obtain in the case of the statues in the antique gallery. Finally

they were gracefully and tastefully coloured. Nothing better indicates

the universality of high art-feeling among the ancient Greeks than the

extraordinary variety, fancy, and beauty of these cheap objects of

every-day decoration; while the unexpected novelty given by the

slightest additions or alterations in what (being moulded) is

essentially the same figure throws a flood of light upon the methods of

plastic art in higher departments. Look out for these exquisite little

figures as you pass through the (inner) rooms on the South Side of the

old Cour du Louvre, on the First Floor. Most of them will be found in

Room L of Baedeker’s plan. Almost every visitor is equally surprised and

charmed by their extremely modern tone of feeling. They are alive and

human. In particular, the =playfulness= of Greek art is here admirably

exemplified. Many of them have touches of the most graceful humour.

Here, again, do not suppose that because I do not specify, these minor

works of art are of little importance. If you have time, examine them

all: but you must do so by individual care and study.

The neighbouring =Salle des Bijoux= contains beautiful antique

jewellery; do not miss the very graceful gold =tiara= presented to the

Scythian King Saitaphernes by the Greek city of Olbia in the Crimea—a

lovely work of the 3rd century B.C. Its authenticity has been disputed,

but not its beauty.

The =Galerie d’Apollon= contains, among many objects of considerable

interest, the Reliquary which encloses the Arm of Charlemagne—who,

having been canonized, was duly entitled to such an honour. The

Reliquary of St. Henry, and the Chasse of St. Louis are also well worthy

of inspection. Notice, too, the Hand of Justice, used at the coronation

of the French Kings. But all these objects can only be properly studied,

by those who wish to investigate them, with the aid of the official

catalogue. I shall recur at greater length to a few of them after our

return from St. Denis.

When you have learnt Paris well, go often to and fro between these rooms

of the Louvre, the Mediæval and Renaissance Sculpture, the halls at

Cluny (particularly Room VI, with its French architectural work), and

the older churches, such as St. Germain-des-Prés, Notre-Dame, St. Denis,

etc. Thus only can you build up and consolidate your conceptions.

* * * * *

A special small collection, to which part of a day may well be devoted,

is the =Early Christian Sculpture=, to which I have already briefly

alluded, in the first room to the R as you enter the Renaissance

Galleries in the Cour du Louvre.

The centre of the hall is occupied by a good Early Christian

=sarcophagus=, with a cover not its own, sufficiently described as to

origin on the label. The front towards the window represents the True

Vine, surrounding the “X P,” which form the first two letters of the

name of Christ in Greek, inscribed in a solar circle, and with the Alpha

and Omega on either side of it. This figure, repeated on various works

in this room in slightly different shapes, is known as a =Labarum=. It

forms, after Constantine (who adopted it as his emblem and that of the

Christianized Empire), the most frequent symbol on early Christian

monuments. Note modern reproductions on the frieze of this apartment.

Its variations are numerous. At the ends, are other True Vines and a

better Labarum, with a Star of Bethlehem. The back has the same devices

repeated.

Wall nearest the entrance, several =inscriptions=, among which notice

the frequency of the Labarum, with the two birds pecking at it,—a

common Early Christian Symbol. Below them, good early =sarcophagus=. On

its end, remote from window, Daniel in the Lions’ Den, a traditional

representation, of which an extremely rude barbaric degradation may be

noticed, high up, near the door which leads into the Della Robbia room,

adjacent. In Early Christian art certain subjects from the Old and New

Testaments became conventionalised, and were repeated on numerous works;

of which this scene of Daniel is an example. Observe here that Old

Testament subjects are frequent; while Madonnas are rare, and saints

almost unknown. Further on, on the ground, sarcophagus representing

=Christ with the Twelve Apostles=. The treatment here, in spite of

slight Oriental tendencies (compare the Mithra reliefs) is on the whole

purely classical. Now, the great interest in this room is to watch the

way in which classical styles and figures passed slowly from pagan types

into Christian, and again from the debased classical types of the later

Empire into those of Romanesque or Gothic barbarity. As an example of

this surviving pagan element, see, on the wall to the R of this

sarcophagus, =Elijah taken up to Heaven= in a chariot of fire, and

leaving his mantle to Elisha. Here, the Jordan is represented, in truly

pagan style, by a river-god reclining on an urn and holding water-weeds.

Such river-gods were the conventional classical way of representing a

river (see the Tiber here, and the Nile of the Vatican, reproduced in

the Vestibule): and Christian artists at first so represented the

Jordan, as in the Baptism of Christ (in mosaic) in the Baptistery of the

Orthodox at Ravenna.

Above the sarcophagus of Christ and the Twelve Apostles is an extremely

beautiful =altar-front= from the abbey of St. Denis (read label) with a

cross and palm trees, the True Vine interlacing it, and the

characteristic wave-pattern, which you may note on many other works in

this room. This is the most beautiful piece of early Romanesque or

intermediate Christian carving in this collection.

In the centre of the Elijah wall, below, a sarcophagus with a very

Oriental figure of the =Good Shepherd=—a frequent early Christian

device. Compare this figure with the plaster cast of a similar statue

from Rome, near the Della Robbia doorway. Compare the marked Orientalism

of face, form, and foot-gear, with the Mithra reliefs. Above it, Scenes

from the Life of Christ:—Blessing the Children, Christ and Peter, the

Woman of Samaria, etc.; treatment quite classical. Still higher,

sarcophagus-front of Christ and the Twelve Apostles; workmanship

becoming decadent; architecture, classical in the centre, passing at the

sides into early Romanesque or Constantinian and Diocletianesque, as in

some of the other examples in this room. L of it, Abraham’s Sacrifice of

Isaac, with rather late architecture.

All the other objects in this room should be carefully examined, and

their place of origin noted. The symbols and the frequent Oriental tinge

should also be observed. Likewise, the absence of several ideas and

symbols which come in later. Note that there are no crucifixions,

sufferings, or martyrdoms; the tone is joyous. Many of the minor objects

have their own value. Thus, the fish, by the entrance door, is a common

Early Christian symbol, because the Greek word ΙΧΘΥΣ [Greek: ICHTHYS]

formed the initials of the sentence, “Jesus Christ, Son of God, the

Saviour”; and its sacred significance is here still further emphasised

by the superimposed cross—a symbol, however, which does _not_ belong to

the very earliest ages of Christendom. So, on the opposite wall of the

window, notice the little Daniel in the Den of Lions, and the youthful

beardless Christ with a halo. The longer you study these interesting

remains, the more will you see in them.

Those who have had their interest aroused in Early Christian art from

the examination of this room will find the subject best pursued at Rome

(Catacombs and Lateran) and Ravenna, where we can trace the long decline

from classical freedom to Byzantine stiffness and Gothic barbarism, as

well as the slow upward movement from the depths of the early Romanesque

style to the precursors of the Renaissance. For the chronological

pursuit of this enticing subject the best order of visiting is Rome,

Ravenna, Bologna, Pisa, Siena, Florence. For a list of the extensive

literature of the subject, see Dean Farrar’s _Christ in Art_.

IV

THE NORTH BANK (RIVE DROITE)

[PARIS, =north of the river=,—which is for most purposes the

practical Paris of business and pleasure (and of the ordinary

tourist) at the present day—has grown by slow degrees from

small beginnings. The various rings of its growth are roughly

marked on the Map of Historical Paris. The wall of =Philippe

Auguste= started from near the easternmost end of the existing

Louvre, and, after bending inland so as just to enclose the

Halles Centrales, reached the river again near the upper end of

the Île St. Louis. It thus encircled the district immediately

opposite the primitive islands: and this innermost region, the

Core of the Right Bank, still contains most of the older

buildings and places of interest N. of the river. =Étienne

Marcel’s= walls took a slightly wider sweep, as shown on the

Map; and by the time of =Louis XIII=. the town had reached the

limit of the =Great Boulevards=, which, with their southern

prolongation, still enclose almost everything of historical or

artistic interest in modern Paris. The fact that the kings had

all their palaces in this northern district was partly a cause,

partly perhaps an effect, of its rapid predominance. The town

was now spreading mainly northward.

The increase of the royal power brought about by Richelieu, and

the consequent stability and internal peace of the kingdom,

combined with the complete change in methods of defence which

culminated in Vauban, enabled Louis XIV to =pull down the walls=

of Paris altogether, and to lay out the space covered by his

predecessor’s fortifications in that series of broad curved

avenues which still bears from this circumstance the name of

Boulevards (“bulwarks” or ramparts). The original line so named,

from the Bastille to the Madeleine, is ordinarily spoken of to

this day simply as “the Boulevard.” All the others called by the

same have borrowed the title, mostly at a very recent date, from

this older girdle. Gradually, the =Faubourgs= which gathered

beyond the line of the inner city, as well as beyond the

artificial southern prolongation of the Boulevards by which

Louis continued his circle, with true French thoroughness of

system, on the southern bank, have entirely coalesced with the

central town, and at last enormously outgrown it. Nevertheless,

to the end, the Paris of Louis XIV continues to enclose almost

all that is vital in the existing city. Especially is =Paris

within the Great Boulevards= to this day the Paris of =business

and finance=: it includes the Bourse, the Banque de France, the

Bourse de Commerce, the chief markets, the Post Office, the

Ministries of Finance, Marine, and Justice, the Hôtel de Ville,

numerous Government Offices, the principal wholesale warehouses,

financial firms, and agencies, and almost all the best shops,

hotels, banks, and business houses.

Even the inner circle itself, again, _within_ the Boulevards,

has been largely transformed by modern alterations, especially

in that extensive reorganisation of the city inaugurated under

Napoleon III by Baron Haussmann. In the brief itinerary which

follows, and in which I have endeavoured to give the reader in

two short walks or drives some general idea of the development

of the Right Bank, with its chief points of interest, I shall

indicate roughly the various ages of the great thoroughfares,

and note with needful conciseness the causes which at various

times led to their construction.]

Paris Grant Allen's Historical Guides · 第 42 / 48 题