5. Blood Atonement and Origin of Plural Marriage, p. 104.

6. Here are a few items in the history of William Marks after he left

the Church and was excommunicated.

At a conference held at Voree, April 6, 1846, "On motion of William

Marks * * * James J. Strang unanimously called to the chair as

President of the Conference." "On motion of Elder William Marks, it was

unanimously resolved that this church receive, acknowledge, and uphold

James J. Strang as President of this church, Prophet, Seer, Revelator,

and Translator, with our faith and prayers."--_Voree Record_.

April 8, 1846: "The First Presidency presented William Marks for the

office of Bishop of the Church and on motion of Apostle John E. Page,

resolved unanimously (that he) be sustained."--_Voree Record_.

Aug. 26, 1849: "Brother William Marks was then ordained, consecrated

and set apart as Apostle of the Lord, Jesus Christ, a Counselor to the

Prophet, one of the First Presidency, and a Prophet of the Most High

God, under the hands of Presidents Strang and Adams."

"Brother William Marks was anointed, _ordained_ and set apart to

administer baptism for the dead, under the hands of Presidents Strang

and Adams."--_Voree Record_.

Previously, William Marks had forsaken James J. Strang, and January,

1849, James J. Strang had a "revelation" in which he said: "Behold my

servant, William Marks, has gone far astray in departing from me, yet

I will give unto him a little space, that he may return and receive

my word, and stand in his place; for I remember his works that he has

done in the time that is past. If he will return and abide faithful, I

will make him great, and his possessions shall be great, and he shall

possess a city, and his children shall dwell therein; a nation shall

call him Blessed."

Well, he returned, and at the conference August 25, 1849, arose and

said: "He ought to make a confession to the Saints for _not_ acting in

his calling and also to ask their forgiveness. Gave a brief history of

the course he had pursued after the martyrdom of the Prophet Joseph,

testified that he had ever had the fullest confidence in the work of

the last days, and knew it was of God, and was now determined by the

help of God to go forth in the discharge of his duty and act in the

place in which he was called by revelation of God through His servant

James" [J. Strang].--_Voree Record_.

He was received back and sustained.

In the year 1852 he joined Charles B. Thompson's organization and

was "_ordained_" "Chief evangelitical teacher of the School of Faith

in Jehovah's Presbytery of Zion." Acting in this calling he wrote an

epistle to "the School of Faith to all the traveling teacher's quorums

and classes of said school, and Jehovah's presbytery of Zion." In that

epistle he said:

"Well Brethren: I have lived to see the foundation and the platform

laid, the principles revealed and the order given, whereby the great

work of the Father can, and will be accomplished. _There is no doubt

resting on my mind in reference to this work of Baneemy being the work

of God, for I am fully convinced that it is the work it purports to

be_, the work of the Father spoken of in the Book of Mormon, to prepare

the way for the restoration of His covenants to the house of Israel.

Now, all who are convinced of this fact ought to move forward and take

a decided stand to labor for Jehovah and the benefit of Mankind. I

intend from this time, henceforth, to labor in the cause and give my

influence and substance to speed the work." (Harbinger and Organ, Vol.

3:52-3-4).

This is his testimony when with Thompson. He later organized a quorum

at Batavia, and appointed James Blakeslee--a man who was excommunicated

from the Church May 18, 1844, with Francis M. Higbee, Charles Ivans and

Austin Cowles, for apostasy--chief, and Jehial Savage teacher. "After

this he joined John E. Page's organization, forgetting how faithful

he had promised to be in Thompson's organization, and later (1859)

connected himself with the "New Organization." He was not one of the

true fold, for:

"When he [the true Shepherd] putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth

before them, and the sheep follow him; for they know his voice. And a

stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him; for they know

not the voice of strangers."--(John 10:4-5).

The Doctrines of Joseph Smith.

One of the charges made by the "Reorganized" Church against the Church

of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, is that when the Apostles assumed

their place as the presiding quorum following the martyrdom of Joseph

and Hyrum Smith, they departed from the pure Gospel as it was revealed

in the Bible, Book of Mormon, and the revelations and teachings of

the Prophet Joseph Smith, and in the stead thereof introduced false

doctrines that were never entertained by the Prophet and were foreign

to the revelations given to the Church. This proves, they declare, the

"apostasy" of the Church and its "rejection" and the few scattered

members who refused to follow the leadership of the Apostles into

forbidden paths, and to accept these "false doctrines" retained the

Spirit of the Lord and were directed by Him to "re-organize" the

"faithful" members into what was then called a "New Organization

of the Church," the name subsequently having been changed to the

"Re-organized" Church. They inform us--though it is most likely with

some misgivings and doubts--that these "faithful" few who refused to

follow after "false gods," or "bow the knee to Baal," still retained

the Priesthood they had received from the "Original" Church and were

"not rejected as individuals" although the "Church was rejected with

its dead." Therefore, when these "faithful" souls tired of wandering

around in the apostate organizations of James J. Strang, Sidney Rigdon,

William Smith, Charles B. Thompson, and others, as sheep that knew

not the Master's voice, and therefore followed strangers, receiving

from these self-appointed leaders "ordinations" and honors, and after

having testified that these false teachers were inspired of God and

their organizations the work of the Lord--after all this, when they

came together and formed the "New Organization" they were still the

"faithful" who had not followed after "false gods" or "bowed the knee

to Baal," and had retained power to "re-organize" the Church according

to the original pattern, although the Prophet had not commissioned them.

In an address to these scattered "faithful" written shortly after the

"New Organization of the Church" was formed, the declaration was made

"that we believe that the Church of Christ organized on the 6th day of

April, A. D. 1830, exists as on that day, wherever six or more Saints

are organized to the pattern in the Book of Doctrine and Covenants."

And, of course, _they_ are the Saints "organized according to the

pattern"--if their word can be taken for the fact.

The president of their church states it this way: "The individuals who

kept this covenant (the new and everlasting covenant of the Gospel)

were accepted of Him and were not rejected, nor their standing before

God put in jeopardy by the departure of others from the faith. Whatever

office in the priesthood each held, under the ordinations ordered by

the call of God and vote of the Church, would remain valid. They could

as elders, priests, teachers, etc., pursue the duties of warning,

expounding, and inviting all to come to Christ, and by command of

God, could build up the Church from any single branch, which, like

themselves, had not bowed the knee to Baal, or departed from the faith

of the Church as founded in the standard works of the body at the death

of Joseph and Hyrum Smith."--(Saints' Herald, Feb. 17, 1904).

In their attempt to prove that the Apostles led the Church astray

and introduced false doctrines, they have one standard by which the

Church and the Apostles are measured; but in proving that _they_ are

the "faithful who have kept the new and everlasting covenant" and have

remained in harmony with "the pattern" their standard of measurement is

quite another thing. The Church is to be judged by all the unauthorized

sayings and doings of any or all of its members or ministers. Their

church is to be judged "by its authorized doctrines and deeds, and not

by the unauthorized sayings or doings of some or many of its members or

ministers." (_See Blood Atonement and Origin of Plural Marriage, page

44_).

They even go so far in their own defense as to reject the teachings and

revelations of the Prophet Joseph Smith, wherein they are in conflict

with their expressed views and have not been received by them by vote

of their church as doctrine; but they deny to us the privilege of being

tried by our "authorized doctrines and deeds," and would force upon us,

as a body, teachings of any member of the Church wherein they think

they could make a point to their advantage; and this they have done in

the courts of the land. We grant unto them the right to be tried by

that rule laid down by the president of their organization, and claim

the right to be tried by the same kind of standard. The Church of Jesus

Christ of Latter-day Saints is not responsible for the sayings or

doings of any individual in conflict with that which has been received

as a standard by which the Church is to be governed. We are to be

judged by _our_ authorized doctrines and deeds not by the whims or

notions of men. But the ministers of the "Reorganization" have not been

willing from the beginning to permit us to stand on this platform, but

insist that we stand on the platform they have prepared for us.

The Bible, Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of

Great Price, including the Articles of Faith, have been received by

the vote of the Church in general conference assembled as the standard

works of the Church. On this platform we stand. The Church is not

responsible for the remarks made by any Elder or for the numerous

books that have been written. The authors of the words or books must

be responsible for their own utterances. It is not to be supposed from

this that all that has been written outside of the standard works of

the Church is discarded and rejected, for these things are profitable

as helps in the government of the Church, and to promote faith in the

members. The point is this, if in these books mistakes are found, "they

are the mistakes of men," and the Church as an organization is not to

be held accountable for them, but for that which is received from time

to time by vote of the Church, as it comes through the President of the

High Priesthood. When the Lord reveals his mind and will it is to be

received, "whether by mine own voice or by the voice of my servants, it

is the same," but we are not to be judged by "unauthorized sayings or

deeds."

The ministers of the "Reorganization" tell us that the Church has

departed from the teachings received from 1830-1844 in many principles

of vital importance, viz., the Godhead, marriage, the atonement, the

location of Zion, Temple building and the ceremonies therein, and other

things, in which they have strictly adhered to the original faith. We

will take these subjects up one by one and see which organization it

is that is following the teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith and the

doctrines of "the Original Church." First as to the Godhead.

Origin of the 'Reorganized' Church and the Question of Succession · 第 34 / 45 题