A COMPARISON.
Can I hope to move my readers to any pitiful sympathy with Mrs.
Worboise, the whole fabric of whose desires was thus sliding into an
abyss? That she is not an interesting woman, I admit; but, at the
same time, I venture to express a doubt whether our use of the word
_uninteresting_ really expresses anything more than our own ignorance.
If we could look into the movements of any heart, I doubt very much
whether that heart would be any longer uninteresting to us. Come with
me, reader, while I endeavor, with some misgiving, I confess, to open
a peep into the heart of this mother, which I have tried hard, though
with scarcely satisfactory success, to understand.
Her chief faculty lay in negations. Her whole life was a kind of
negation--a negation of warmth, a negation of impulse, a negation
of beauty, a negation of health. When Thomas was a child, her chief
communication with him was in negatives. "_You must not_; _you are
not_; _do not_;" and so on. Her theory of the world was humanity
deprived of God. Because of something awful in the past, something
awful lay in the future. To escape from the consequences of a condition
which you could not help, you must believe certain things after a
certain fashion--hold, in fact, certain theories with regard to
the most difficult questions, on which, too, you were incapable of
thinking correctly. Him who held these theories you must regard as
a fellow-favorite of heaven; who held them not you would do well to
regard as a publican and a sinner, even if he should be the husband in
your bosom. All the present had value only of reference to the future.
All your strife must be to become something you are not at all now,
to feel what you do not feel, to judge against your nature, to regard
everything in you as opposed to your salvation, and God, who is far
away from you, and whose ear is not always ready to hear, as your only
deliverer from the consequences he has decreed; and this in virtue of
no immediate relation to you, but from regard to another whose innocent
suffering is to our guilt the only counterpoise weighty enough to
satisfy his justice. All her anxiety for her son turned upon his final
escape from punishment. She did not torment her soul, her nights were
not sleepless with the fear that her boy should be unlike Christ,
that he might do that which was mean, selfish, dishonest, cowardly,
vile, but with the fear that he was or might be doomed to an eternal
suffering.
Now, in so far as this idea had laid hold of the boy, it had aroused
the instinct of self-preservation mingled with a repellent feeling
in regard to God. All that was poor and common and selfish in him
was stirred up on the side of religion; all that was noble (and of
that there was far more than my reader will yet fancy) was stirred up
against it. The latter, however, was put down by degrees, leaving the
whole region, when the far outlook of selfishness should be dimmed
by the near urgings of impulse, open to the inroads of the enemy,
enfeebled and ungarrisoned. Ah! if she could have told the boy, every
time his soul was lifted up within him by anything beautiful, or
great, or true, "That, my boy, is God--God telling you that you must
be beautiful, and great, and true, else you cannot be His child!" If,
every time he uttered his delight in flower or bird, she had, instead
of speaking of sin and shortcoming, spoken of love and aspiration
toward the Father of Light, the God of Beauty! If she had been able to
show him that what he admired in Byron's heroes, even, was the truth,
courage, and honesty, hideously mingled, as it might be, with cruelty
and conceit and lies! But almost everything except the Epistles seemed
to her of the devil and not of God. She was even jealous of the Gospel
of God, lest it should lead him astray from the interpretation she put
upon it. She did not understand that nothing can convince of sin--but
the vision of holiness; that to draw near to the Father is to leave
self behind; that the Son of God appeared that by the sight of himself
he might convince the world of sin. But then hers was a life that had
never broken the shell, while through the shell the worm of suffering
had eaten, and was boring into her soul. Have pity and not contempt,
reader, who would not be like her. She did not believe in her own love,
even, as from God, and therefore she restrained it before the lad. So
he had no idea of how she loved him. If she had only thrown her arms
about him, and let her heart out toward him, which surely it is right
to do sometimes at least, how differently would he have listened to
what she had to say! His heart was being withered on the side next his
mother for lack of nourishment: there are many lives ruined because
they have not had tenderness enough. Kindness is not tenderness.
She could not represent God to the lad. If, instead of constantly
referring to the hell that lies in the future, she had reminded him of
the beginnings of that hell in his own bosom, appealing to himself
whether there was not a faintness there that indicated something wrong,
a dull pain that might grow to a burning agony, a consciousness of
wrong-doing, thinking, and feeling, a sense of a fearful pit and a
miry clay within his own being from which he would gladly escape, a
failing even from the greatness of such grotesque ideals as he loved in
poetry, a meanness, paltriness, and at best insignificance of motive
and action,--and then told him that out of this was God stretching
forth the hand to take and lift him, that he was waiting to exalt him
to a higher ideal of manhood than anything which it had entered into
his heart to conceive, that he would make him clean from the defilement
which he was afraid to confess to himself because it lowered him in his
own esteem,--then perhaps the words of his mother, convincing him that
God was not against him but for him, on the side of his best feelings
and against his worst, might have sunk into the heart of the weak
youth, and he would straightway have put forth what strength he had,
and so begun to be strong. For he who acts has strength, is strong, and
will be stronger. But she could not tell him this: she did not know it
herself. Her religion was something there, then; not here, now. She
would give Mr. Simon a five-pound note for his Scripture-reading among
the poor, and the moment after refuse the request of her needle-woman
from the same district who begged her to raise her wages from eighteen
pence to two shillings a day. Religion--the bond between man and
God--had nothing to do with the earnings of a sister, whose pale face
told of "penury and pine" a sadder story even than that written upon
the countenance of the invalid, for to labor in weakness, longing
for rest, is harder than to endure a good deal of pain upon a sofa.
Until we begin to learn that the only way to _serve_ God in any real
sense of the word is to serve our neighbor, we may have knocked at the
wicket-gate, but I doubt if we have got one foot across the threshold
of the kingdom.
Add to this condition of mind a certain uncomfortable effect produced
upon the mother by the son's constantly reminding her of the father
whom she had quite given up trying to love, and I think my reader
will be a little nearer to the understanding of the relation, if such
it could well be called, between the two. The eyes of both were yet
unopened to the poverty of their own condition. The mother especially
said that she was "rich, and had need of nothing," when she was
"wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked." But she had
a hard nature to begin with, and her pain occupied her all the more
that she neither sought nor accepted sympathy. And although she was
none the less a time-server and a worldly-minded woman that she decried
worldliness, and popery, and gave herself to the saving of her soul,
yet the God who makes them loves even such people and knows all about
them; and it is well for them that he is their judge and not we.
Let us now turn to another woman--Mrs. Morgenstern. I will tell you
what she was like. She was a Jewess and like a Jewess. But there is as
much difference between Jewesses as there is between Englishwomen. Is
there any justice in fixing upon the lowest as _the type_? How does
the Scotchman like to have his nation represented: by the man outside
the tobacco-shop, or by the cantankerous logician and theologian so
well known to some of us? There is a Jewess that flaunts in gorgeous
raiment and unclean linen; and there is a Jewess noble as a queen, and
pure as a daisy--fit to belong to that nation of which Mary the mother
was born. Mrs. Morgenstern was of the latter class--tall, graceful,
even majestic in the fashion of her form and carriage. Every feature
was Jewish, and yet she might have been English, or Spanish, or German,
just as well. Her eyes were dark--black, I would say, if I had ever
seen black eyes--and proud, yet with a dove-like veil over their fire.
Sometimes there was even a trouble to be seen in them, as of a rainy
mist amid the glow of a southern sky. I never could be quite sure what
this trouble meant. She was rich, therefore she had no necessity; she
was not avaricious, and therefore she had no fear of dying in the
work-house. She had but one child, therefore she was neither wearied
with motherhood, nor a sufferer from suppressed maternity, moved by
which divine impulse so many women take to poodles instead of orphans.
Her child was healthy and active, and gave her no anxiety. That she
loved her husband, no one who saw those eastern eyes rest upon him for
a moment could doubt. What, then, could be the cause of that slight
restlessness, that gauzy change, that pensive shadow? I think that
there was more love in her yet than knew how to get out of her. She
would look round sometimes--it was a peculiar movement--just as if some
child had been pulling at her skirts. She had lost a child, but I do
not think that was the cause. And however this may be, I do believe
that nothing but the love of God will satisfy the power of love in any
woman's bosom. But did not Rebecca--they loved their old Jewish names,
that family--did not Rebecca Morgenstern love God? Truly I think she
did--but not enough to satisfy herself. And I venture to say more: I
do not believe she could love him to the degree necessary for her own
peace till she recognized the humanity in him. But she was more under
the influences emanating from that story of the humanity of God than
she knew herself. At all events she was a most human and lovely lady,
full of grace and truth, like Mary before she was a Christian; and
it took a good while, namely all her son's life and longer, to make
_her_ one. Rebecca Morgenstern never became a Christian. But she loved
children, whether they were Christians or not. And she loved the poor,
whether they were Christians or not; and, like Dorcas, made and caused
to be made, coats and garments for them. And, for my part, I know, if I
had the choice, whether I would appear before the Master in the train
of the _unbelieving_ Mrs. Morgenstern or that of the _believing_ Mrs.
Worboise. And as to self-righteousness, I think there is far less of
that among those who regard the works of righteousness as the means
of salvation, than among those by whom faith itself is degraded into
a work of merit--a condition by fulfilling which they become fit for
God's mercy; for such is the trick which the old Adam and the Enemy
together are ready enough to play the most orthodox, in despite of the
purity of their creed.