I stuck to my argument.

“I don't LIKE him,” said the official conclusively, and it seemed to me

at the time he was just blind prejudice speaking....

I came nearer the truth of the matter as I came to realise that

our philosophies differed profoundly. That isn't a very curable

difference,--once people have grown up. Theirs was a philosophy devoid

of FINESSE. Temperamentally the Baileys were specialised, concentrated,

accurate, while I am urged either by some Inner force or some entirely

assimilated influence in my training, always to round off and shadow

my outlines. I hate them hard. I would sacrifice detail to modelling

always, and the Baileys, it seemed to me, loved a world as flat and

metallic as Sidney Cooper's cows. If they had the universe in hand I

know they would take down all the trees and put up stamped tin green

shades and sunlight accumulators. Altiora thought trees hopelessly

irregular and sea cliffs a great mistake.... I got things clearer as

time went on. Though it was an Hegelian mess of which I had partaken at

Codger's table by way of a philosophical training, my sympathies have

always been Pragmatist. I belong almost by nature to that school of

Pragmatism that, following the medieval Nominalists, bases itself upon

a denial of the reality of classes, and of the validity of general

laws. The Baileys classified everything. They were, in the scholastic

sense--which so oddly contradicts the modern use of the word “Realists.”

They believed classes were REAL and independent of their individuals.

This is the common habit of all so-called educated people who have no

metaphysical aptitude and no metaphysical training. It leads them to a

progressive misunderstanding of the world. It was a favourite trick

of Altiora's to speak of everybody as a “type”; she saw men as samples

moving; her dining-room became a chamber of representatives. It gave

a tremendously scientific air to many of their generalisations, using

“scientific” in its nineteenth-century uncritical Herbert Spencer sense,

an air that only began to disappear when you thought them over again in

terms of actuality and the people one knew....

At the Baileys' one always seemed to be getting one's hands on the very

strings that guided the world. You heard legislation projected to affect

this “type” and that; statistics marched by you with sin and shame and

injustice and misery reduced to quite manageable percentages, you found

men who were to frame or amend bills in grave and intimate exchange

with Bailey's omniscience, you heard Altiora canvassing approaching

resignations and possible appointments that might make or mar a

revolution in administrative methods, and doing it with a vigorous

directness that manifestly swayed the decision; and you felt you were

in a sort of signal box with levers all about you, and the world outside

there, albeit a little dark and mysterious beyond the window, running

on its lines in ready obedience to these unhesitating lights, true and

steady to trim termini.

And then with all this administrative fizzle, this pseudo-scientific

administrative chatter, dying away in your head, out you went into the

limitless grimy chaos of London streets and squares, roads and avenues

lined with teeming houses, each larger than the Chambers Street house

and at least equally alive, you saw the chaotic clamour of hoardings,

the jumble of traffic, the coming and going of mysterious myriads,

you heard the rumble of traffic like the noise of a torrent; a vague

incessant murmur of cries and voices, wanton crimes and accidents bawled

at you from the placards; imperative unaccountable fashions swaggered

triumphant in dazzling windows of the shops; and you found yourself

swaying back to the opposite conviction that the huge formless spirit

of the world it was that held the strings and danced the puppets on the

Bailey stage....

Under the lamps you were jostled by people like my Staffordshire uncle

out for a spree, you saw shy youths conversing with prostitutes, you

passed young lovers pairing with an entire disregard of the social

suitability of the “types” they might blend or create, you saw men

leaning drunken against lamp-posts whom you knew for the “type” that

will charge with fixed bayonets into the face of death, and you found

yourself unable to imagine little Bailey achieving either drunkenness or

the careless defiance of annihilation. You realised that quite a lot of

types were underrepresented in Chambers Street, that feral and obscure

and altogether monstrous forces must be at work, as yet altogether

unassimilated by those neat administrative reorganisations.

5

Altiora, I remember, preluded Margaret's reappearance by announcing her

as a “new type.”

I was accustomed to go early to the Baileys' dinners in those days, for

a preliminary gossip with Altiora in front of her drawing-room fire. One

got her alone, and that early arrival was a little sign of appreciation

she valued. She had every woman's need of followers and servants.

“I'm going to send you down to-night,” she said, “with a very

interesting type indeed--one of the new generation of serious gals.

Middle-class origin--and quite well off. Rich in fact. Her step-father

was a solicitor and something of an ENTREPRENEUR towards the end, I

fancy--in the Black Country. There was a little brother died, and she's

lost her mother quite recently. Quite on her own, so to speak. She's

never been out into society very much, and doesn't seem really very

anxious to go.... Not exactly an intellectual person, you know, but

quiet, and great force of character. Came up to London on her own and

came to us--someone had told her we were the sort of people to advise

her--to ask what to do. I'm sure she'll interest you.”

“What CAN people of that sort do?” I asked. “Is she capable of

investigation?”

Altiora compressed her lips and shook her head. She always did shake her

head when you asked that of anyone.

“Of course what she ought to do,” said Altiora, with her silk dress

pulled back from her knee before the fire, and with a lift of her voice

towards a chuckle at her daring way of putting things, “is to marry a

member of Parliament and see he does his work.... Perhaps she will.

It's a very exceptional gal who can do anything by herself--quite

exceptional. The more serious they are--without being exceptional--the

more we want them to marry.”

Her exposition was truncated by the entry of the type in question.

“Well!” cried Altiora turning, and with a high note of welcome, “HERE

you are!”

Margaret had gained in dignity and prettiness by the lapse of five

years, and she was now very beautifully and richly and simply dressed.

Her fair hair had been done in some way that made it seem softer and

more abundant than it was in my memory, and a gleam of purple velvet-set

diamonds showed amidst its mist of little golden and brown lines.

Her dress was of white and violet, the last trace of mourning for her

mother, and confessed the gracious droop of her tall and slender body.

She did not suggest Staffordshire at all, and I was puzzled for a moment

to think where I had met her. Her sweetly shaped mouth with the

slight obliquity of the lip and the little kink in her brow were

extraordinarily familiar to me. But she had either been prepared

by Altiora or she remembered my name. “We met,” she said, “while my

step-father was alive--at Misterton. You came to see us”; and instantly

I recalled the sunshine between the apple blossom and a slender pale

blue girlish shape among the daffodils, like something that had sprung

from a bulb itself. I recalled at once that I had found her very

interesting, though I did not clearly remember how it was she had

interested me.

Other guests arrived--it was one of Altiora's boldly blended mixtures of

people with ideas and people with influence or money who might perhaps

be expected to resonate to them. Bailey came down late with an air of

hurry, and was introduced to Margaret and said absolutely nothing to

her--there being no information either to receive or impart and nothing

to do--but stood snatching his left cheek until I rescued him and her,

and left him free to congratulate the new Lady Snape on her husband's K.

C. B.

I took Margaret down. We achieved no feats of mutual expression, except

that it was abundantly clear we were both very pleased and interested

to meet again, and that we had both kept memories of each other. We made

that Misterton tea-party and the subsequent marriages of my cousins

and the world of Burslem generally, matter for quite an agreeable

conversation until at last Altiora, following her invariable custom,

called me by name imperatively out of our duologue. “Mr. Remington,” she

said, “we want your opinion--” in her entirely characteristic effort to

get all the threads of conversation into her own hands for the climax

that always wound up her dinners. How the other women used to hate those

concluding raids of hers! I forget most of the other people at that

dinner, nor can I recall what the crowning rally was about. It didn't in

any way join on to my impression of Margaret.

In the drawing-room of the matting floor I rejoined her, with Altiora's

manifest connivance, and in the interval I had been thinking of our

former meeting.

“Do you find London,” I asked, “give you more opportunity for doing

things and learning things than Burslem?”

She showed at once she appreciated my allusion to her former

confidences. “I was very discontented then,” she said and paused. “I've

really only been in London for a few months. It's so different. In

Burslem, life seems all business and getting--without any reason. One

went on and it didn't seem to mean anything. At least anything that

mattered.... London seems to be so full of meanings--all mixed up

together.”

She knitted her brows over her words and smiled appealingly at the end

as if for consideration for her inadequate expression, appealingly and

almost humorously.

I looked understandingly at her. “We have all,” I agreed, “to come to

London.”

“One sees so much distress,” she added, as if she felt she had

completely omitted something, and needed a codicil.

“What are you doing in London?”

“I'm thinking of studying. Some social question. I thought perhaps I

might go and study social conditions as Mrs. Bailey did, go perhaps as

a work-girl or see the reality of living in, but Mrs. Bailey thought

perhaps it wasn't quite my work.”

“Are you studying?”

“I'm going to a good many lectures, and perhaps I shall take up a

regular course at the Westminster School of Politics and Sociology. But

Mrs. Bailey doesn't seem to believe very much in that either.”

Her faintly whimsical smile returned. “I seem rather indefinite,” she

apologised, “but one does not want to get entangled in things one can't

do. One--one has so many advantages, one's life seems to be such a trust

and such a responsibility--”

She stopped.

“A man gets driven into work,” I said.

“It must be splendid to be Mrs. Bailey,” she replied with a glance of

envious admiration across the room.

“SHE has no doubts, anyhow,” I remarked.

“She HAD,” said Margaret with the pride of one who has received great

confidences.

6

“You've met before?” said Altiora, a day or so later.

The New Machiavelli · 第 31 / 87 题