PART II: POTTERY EVIDENCE--_Ivor Noël Hume_ 91

THE SALT-GLAZED STONEWARE 91

STONEWARE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES 102

THE EARTHENWARES 105

CONCLUSIONS 109

[Illustration: Figure 1.--MODERN YORKTOWN, VIRGINIA, showing original

survey plat on which William Rogers' name appears on lots 51 and 55.

Additional properties which he acquired are mentioned in his will as

lots 59, 74, and 75.]

The "Poor Potter" of Yorktown

_Pottery making in colonial Virginia, strongly discouraged by

a mercantilistic England, seemingly was almost nonexistent

according to the Governor's reports which mention but one nameless

"poor potter" at Yorktown, whose wares are dismissed as being

low in quantity and quality. This paper, the combined effort

of a historian and an archeologist, provides evidence that the

Yorktown potter was neither poor nor nameless, that his ware was

of sufficient quantity and quality to offer competition to English

imports, and that official depreciation of his economic importance

apparently was deemed politic by the colonial Governor._

THE AUTHORS: _C. Malcolm Watkins is curator of cultural history in

the Smithsonian Institution's Museum of History and Technology,

and Ivor Noël Hume is director of archeology at Colonial

Williamsburg and an honorary research associate of the Smithsonian

Institution._

Smithsonian Institution - United States National Museum - Bulletin 249 Contributions from the Museum of History and Technology Papers 52-54 on Archeology · 第 5 / 7 章