The wrong use of the Bible

"The Scriptures will be more studied than they have been, and in a

different manner--not as a magazine of propositions and mere dialectic

entities, but as inspirations and poetic forms of life; requiring,

also, divine inbreathings and exaltations in us, that we may ascend

into their meaning. No false _precision,_ which the nature and

conditions of spiritual truth forbid, will, by cutting up the body of

truth into definite and dead morsels, throw us into states of excision

and division, equally manifold. We shall receive the truth of God in a

more organic and organific manner, as being itself an essentially vital

power."

Horace Bushnell. God in Christ; p. 93.

"But, further, the zealots for the Bible _as it is_, just because it

_is_, forget that, in their outcry in behalf of every existing book,

and paragraph, and sentence, and word in the present edition of it, as

'God's Word written,' they are simply begging the question, What _is_

'God's Word written'? What _is_, without any doubt, a genuine portion

of those writings which contain the message from God? The question is,

in no case, 'Will you part with any utterance of God's voice, whether

through apostle or evangelist?' but only, 'Is this particular word, or

sentence, or passage, truly such an utterance? Have we good grounds for

accepting it as such? Nay, have we not overwhelming grounds for

doubting it to be such?' We do right to hold fast 'the faith once

delivered to the saints,' but the more we are determined to be faithful

to this faith, just the more sedulous and more searching must be our

inquiry, Have we here this faith in its integrity?"

Thomas Griffith, late Prebendary of St. Paul's, London: The Gospel of

the Divine Life, p. 418.

The Right and Wrong Uses of the Bible · 第 32 / 68 题