III.

_It is a wrong use of the Bible to accept everything recorded therein as

necessarily true._

If the historians were simply the amanuenses of the Infinite Spirit, then

of course they could not have erred in anything they recorded. If they

were ordinary writers, trying to tell the story of their peoples' growth;

searching court archives, state annals, old parchments of forgotten

writers, consulting the traditions of town and village, using their

material in the best way their abilities enabled them to do; using all to

teach virtue and religion, for which alone they were specially qualified

of God; then all questions of historical accuracy are beside the mark.

Nothing in their inspiration guarantees their historical accuracy; their

philological learning in using ancient poetic language, or their critical

judgment in detecting exaggerations. Are we to wait anxiously upon the

latest Assyrian tablets or the freshest Egyptian mummy to confirm our

faith that God has spoken to the spirit of man? Are we to quake in our

shoes when a few ciphers are cut off from the roll of Israel's impossible

armies? If much that we read as literal history turns out legend and myth,

are we to find a painful alternative between a blind credulity and as

blind a skepticism? We follow this same re-reading of Roman and Grecian

story untroubled, and see the heroes of our childhood turn into races and

sun-myths without calling the Muse of History a fraud.

Has it been such comfort to us to read the doings of Samson as actual

history, slaying a thousand men with the jawbone of an ass, tying

fire-brands to the tails of three hundred foxes, etc., that we should

resent the translation of this impossible hero into the Semitic Hercules,

a solar myth? Or if, perchance, the historian accepted from remote

antiquity the accounts of great deeds and striking events, as they were

told at the camp fires of the Hebrew nomads, or in the merry makings of

the Palestinian villages, with an ever growing nimbus of the marvelous

gathering around them; and if thus impossible marvels are reported to us

soberly, are we to be compelled to accept them uncritically or reject the

Bible altogether? The Bible itself points us to the interpretation of such

legends We have some histories written by the actors in the scenes

narrated. Nehemiah and Ezra, leaders in the most important movement of

Hebrew history after the migration led by Moses, left accounts of their

work from their own pens. In such a crucial epoch as that of the

restoration of the Jews to their native land, after the dispersion in

Babylonia, we might expect to find miraculous interpositions on behalf of

the chosen people, if they are to be found anywhere. But no tale of

miracle adorns their simple pages. No other old Testament history, written

by the actors in its scenes, tells of miracles. Such stories are found in

the traditions written down long after the events narrated, by men who

knew nothing of the facts at first hand. Exceptions to this rule occur

alone in such startling events as the mysterious calamity that befell

Sennacherib; which strongly impressed the imagination of the people and

naturally gave rise to exaggerations that we can no longer resolve.

Perhaps Elisha's iron axe head did swim upon the water. I am prepared to

believe almost anything after our spiritualistic mediums, and their

exposers. Whether it did or did not concerns me no whit. I shrug my

shoulders and read on. I cannot make out the historical fact which was at

the basis of the Red Sea deliverance; nor do I care much to make out this

or any other Old Testament miracle. If I felt obliged to accept literally

these stories, or to lose my faith in the voice of God which speaks

through the men of the Bible I should care greatly. In the true view of

the Bible I am delivered from solicitude about these traditions, and am

under no constraint of credulity. Those who can believe the story of

Elisha and the bears, or of Elijah's ascension into heaven, may; those who

cannot, need not; and both alike should reverently read their Bibles, not

for these tales of wonder, but for the still small voice of the eternal

spirit sounding through holy lives and holier aspirations, until He came

whose life was the Word of God, the Wonderful.[28]

The Right and Wrong Uses of the Bible · 第 28 / 68 题