CHAPTER XXI

THE FRENCH ROYALISTS

Many others besides Lord Derby were at this time speculating on the chances

of one more revolution in France. The state of public opinion seemed to

point to a coming weariness of the corruption incidental to a republic, and

a desire for the restoration of the monarchy. Since the obstinate refusal

of the Comte de Chambord, in 1873, to accept the change from the _drapeau

blanc_ of the Bourbon dynasty to the flaunting _tricolor_ which savoured of

democracy, monarchy had seemed impossible. But the Comte de Chambord was

known to be in feeble health, and he had no children. If he should die, the

fusion of the antagonistic parties was possible, was indeed probable; and

it was generally understood that the Comte de Paris was singularly free

from the prejudices which had rendered impossible a restoration in the

person of his cousin. He was, indeed, not ambitious, and he was wealthy.

The two ordinary motives of conspirators were wanting; but he loved France

by force of sympathy and education, and he honestly believed that a

restoration would be the best thing for his country. As a matter of love

and duty he felt bound to work in order to bring about this most desirable

of changes.

_From the Comte de Paris_

Chateau d'Eu, le 2 janvier 1883.

Mon cher Monsieur Reeve,--Je suis bien touché de la bonne pensée que vous

avez eue de m'écrire à l'occasion de la nouvelle année. Je vous remercie

de tous vos bons voeux, et je vous prie de recevoir ici l'assurance de

ceux que je forme pour vous et pour les vôtres.

I am greatly obliged by your remarks on the future of France. This is

indeed dark; and, as you so well express it, the sterility of democracy and

the impotence of the institutions based on it are most striking. They are

especially so here. This dearth, this void, of which you speak increases

from day to day. The men of note who were formed under a different rule,

and who came to the front under special circumstances, are dying off and

are not replaced. It is only a few days since one, [Footnote: Gambetta,

died December 31st, 1882.] the most able we have had since the death of M.

Thiers, has been carried off by an obscure--a mysterious--illness. Of those

left, there is no one who can take his place. In some respects he was a

truly remarkable man. He, and he alone, was known from one end of France

to the other; he, and none but he, could even for one day have united the

blind and jealous forces of democracy; he alone could give the republicans

the organisation and appearance of a party, but owing to the violence of

his temperament he could never have held the reins of government. He would

have been exceedingly dangerous in the department of foreign affairs, which

would have been his choice. He would, indeed, have brought to it a most

honourable sentiment of the dignity of France, but he had neither prudence

nor experience. There were in Europe some who counted on him; others who

feared him; every one, I think, exaggerated what he would have done or

tried to do.

I regret extremely the difficulties which are rising between France and

England about Egypt, and I confess I do not understand the attitude of our

Government. The temper of France towards England resembles that of a man

who has been offered an equal share in a profitable adventure, who has

refused to accept the risk, and who is now vexed at the success of his

neighbour. But no Government worthy of the name will allow itself to be

influenced by such feelings, or is unable to adapt itself to the changes

which circumstances may give rise to. And besides, so little attention is

paid in France to foreign politics that the Government may do whatever it

likes, provided that does not lead to war--under any form or against any

enemy....

J'ai bien regretté de ne pas pouvoir rencontrer Mlle. Reeve à Paris.

Veuillez lui dire que si elle veut prendre quelques truites, elle devrait

venir ici du 28 ou 29 mai au 5 ou 6 pin. C'est la date exacte de l'éclosion

du May-fly, et à ce moment-là nous faisons vraiment de très belles pêches.

En attendant nous partons pour Cannes la semaine prochaine. J'espère

y rencontrer quelques amis d'Angleterre, dont plusieurs sont déjà fort

anciens--comme Lord Cardwell, Sir C. Murray, Lord Clarence Paget, le Duc

d'Argyll, &c.

Veuillez offrir mes hommages à Madame Reeve, et me croire.

Votre bien affectionné,

LOUIS-PHILLIPE D'ORLEANS.

_From Lord Granville_

_Walmer Castle, January 7th_.--I return you, with many thanks, the Comte de

Paris' remarkable letter. If the Duc de Bordeaux would follow the example

which has been sadly set by Gambetta and Chanzy, [Footnote: Chanzy had died

two days before, January 5th. The Duc de Bordeaux better known at this

time as the Comte de Chambord, did follow the example a few months later,

August 24th.] the prospects at Eu would be good.

With you, I do not feel inclined to gush over Gambetta. It is true that

he was well disposed towards England, but his love would have been of a

troublesome and exacting character.

The Journal has little of interest. It notes the return to London on

January 13th; a journey to York on the 29th, on a visit to the Archbishop

[Thomson], who wrote an article for the 'Review' on the Ecclesiastical

Commission; and, on February 17th, to Battle Abbey. Beyond these trivial

entries, nothing except the mention of several dinner parties--some 'good,'

some 'dull.' Then, later:--

_April 16th to May 22nd_.--At Foxholes. Very cold. Snow in May.

_June 8th_.--Dinner at Lord Carnarvon's. Sir R. and Lady Wallace, Lord

Salisbury, Lady Portsmouth.

_15th_.--Dinner at Alfred Morrison's, [Footnote: Mr. Morrison, so well

known to historical students by his splendid collection of MSS., died on

December 22nd, 1897.] first time. Splendid house.

_21st_.--Dinner at home. Duc d'Aumale, Granvilles, Malmesburys,

Carlingford, G. Trevelyans, and others.

_23rd_.--Philobiblon breakfast at Gibbs's. Duc d'Aumale, Duke of Albany. To

Military Tournament with Lady Malmesbury.

_25th_.--Duke of Cleveland's dinner to Duc d'Aumale. Duke of Grafton, Lady

Cork.

_From the Comte de Paris_

Château d'Eu, 16 juin.

Mon cher Monsieur Reeve,--J'ai hâte de répondre à votre aimable lettre du

8, et de vous remercier de votre bienveillante appréciation d'un travail

qui prend des proportions vraiment formidables. Je suis en effet en train

d'imprimer le 7me volume, et d'écrire le 8me, qui sera suivi encore de deux

autres, si Dieu me prête vie. Je suis obligé d'entrer dans beaucoup de

détails pour donner à cette histoire un véritable intérêt aux yeux du

public américain, qui est celui auquel je m'adresse particuliérement, le

seul qui puisse me fournir beaucoup de lecteurs. La traduction anglaise en

un gros volume a dû paraître ou paraîtra incessamment à Philadelphie.

Vous trouverez le Duc d'Aumale en fort bellé sante et très brillant, malgré

toutes les préoccupations que nous avons eues, et la blessure très vive

que lui a faite l'odieuse mesure militaire [Footnote: The removal of the

Orleanist princes from the active list of the army in February.] dont il a

été l'objet. Je regrette de ne pouvoir l'accompagner en Angleterre, où

j'ai tant d'amis que je serais heureux de revoir. Mais ne puis-je au moins

espérer que vous nous ferez cette année, avec Madame et Mademoiselle Reeve,

une visite au Château d'Eu? Nous resterons ici tout le mois de Juillet.

J'ai été assez heureux à la pêche ici dans notre petite rivéire. Pendant

une quinzaine, du 25 mai au 10 juin, j'ai pris à la mouche 82 truites

pesant 42 livres.

This was the sport to which he had particularly invited Miss Reeve in

January, and which, he goes on to say, has given him the idea of going to

Norway in August. As to this, he begs Reeve to make some inquiries for him,

and concludes--Veuillez me croire votre bien affectionné,

LOUIS-PHILIPPE D'ORLEANS.

Another chatty letter, four days later, June 20th, has:--

Nous serons charmés de vous voir venir ici vers le 24 juillet avec Madame

Reeve, tout en regrettant que Mademoiselle votre fille ne puisse pas vous

accompagner. Nous espérons qu'elle pourra venir ici l'année prochaine en

mai. Mais qui peut faire sous un gouvernement démocratique des projets à si

longue échéance?

The visit was, however, prevented by an event of the most serious political

importance; an event which during the next three or four years was thought

by many to be likely to change the destinies of France, to affect the

fortunes of Europe. It may be best told in the words of the person most

affected.

_From the Comte de Paris_

Château d'Eu, le 18 juillet.

Mon cher Monsieur Reeve,--Je suis revenu ici il y a deux jours après avoir

fait en Autriche un voyage imprévu dont vous avez connu le motif et le

résultat. J'ai été reçu par l'auguste malade [Footnote: The Comte de

Chambord, known among the Legitimists as Henri V.] avec une affectueuse

cordialité qui m'a profondément touché, et j'ai quitté Vienne en conservant

quelque espoir de le voir sortir de la crise cruelle qu'il vient de

traverser. Les dernières nouvelles reçues ne démentent pas cet espoir,

quoique son état soit toujours fort grave et plein de périls. Je ne puis

naturellement faire dans une pareille situation de projets à longue

échéance. Non seulement tout plan de voyage est abandonné pour le moment,

mais je vis au jour le jour, toujours prêt à partir au reçu d'une dépêche

annonçant le dénouement fatal. Aussi ne puis-je dans ce moment insister

pour vous engager à faire au Château d'Eu cette visite dont je me

promettais tant de plaisir et d'intérêt, mais qui, dans les circonstances

actuelles, risquerait fort d'être brusquement interrompue. Je le regrette

vivement, et j'espère pouvoir m'en dédommager plus tard.

En attendant, j'ai hâte de vous remercier de tout ce que vous me dites sur

ma situation actuelle et sur l'intérêt que vous y portez. Je vous remercie

également de ce que vous avez écrit sur ce sujet à la fin du dernier numéro

de la _Revue d'Edimbourg_. On sent en lisant ce morceau combien celui qui

l'a écrit aime et connaît bien la France. Il a été fort remarqué chez nous.

Si vous me permettez d'ajouter un seul mot qui vous prouvera que je l'ai lu

avec attention, je vous signalerai un _lapsus calami_ qui vous a échappé.

Le fondateur de notre branche d'Orléans, fils de Louis XIII, frère de Louis

XIV, s'appelait Philippe et non Gaston. Gaston était le nom du fils de

Henri IV, frère de Louis XIII, le Duc d'Orléans de la Fronde, qui ne laissa

que des filles, entre autres Mlle. de Montpensier.

Like you, I am uneasy at the existing relations of France and England,

though I fully believe that the two Governments are respectively animated

by the most conciliatory intentions. In my opinion, the blame rests on

what is now called 'the colonial policy,' which consists in scattering our

forces to the four corners of the world, while Continental Europe is armed

to the teeth and does not afford us a single ally. But even this policy

might be followed without causing any difficulty with England, if there was

a readiness to anticipate it by frank explanations. The world is big enough

for it. Unfortunately, since the Egyptian business--which might easily have

been the opportunity for a friendly agreement, but which we have made such

a mess of--all these questions are confused and taken amiss....

Je termine en vous renouvelant encore tous mes remerciments, et en vous

priant de me croire votre bien affectionné,

LOUIS-PHILIPPE D'ORLÉANS.

The Journal then has:--

_July 24th_.--Great dinner at the Granvilles' to receive Waddington

[Footnote: M. Waddington had a career that has perhaps no parallel. The son

of an Englishman settled in France, he was educated at Rugby and at Trinity

College, Cambridge; and was second classic, Chancellor's medallist, and

No. 6 in the University boat in 1849. Having elected to be a Frenchman, he

travelled in Asia Minor, and achieved a reputation as an archaeologist and

numismatist. After the fall of the Empire he entered into public life; was

foreign minister and the representative of France at Berlin in 1878; was

prime minister and the representative of France at the Coronation of the

Tsar in 1881, and was French ambassador in London from 1883 to 1893.

He died in 1894 at the age of 68.] [the new French Ambassador]. I was

introduced to Count Herbert Bismarck. Sat by Errington. Forty-two people

there at several tables.

_26th_.--To Foxholes.

_September 10th_.--Left Foxholes for Broglie _viâ_ Havre. Slept at Rouen.

11th, Broglie, by rail to Bernay; at Broglie, Vieil Castel, Laugel, Target,

Gavard. Old name of Broglie, Chambrey.

_15th_.--Left Broglie for Val Richer. Drive with De Witt.

_17th_.--Gout coming on in foot. Started for Honfleur and Havre; quite

lame. Spent the day on board the Wolf; met Prothero again. Managed to get

home on the 18th. Laid up in bed for a week.

_From Lord Granville_

_September 29th_.--The Comte de Paris has a difficult game to play; and the

large intelligent family, living in great luxury and consideration, is not

the best machine for carrying hopes more or less forlorn; but I expect it

would be difficult to find an abler or more judicious pretender. My fear is

that--as you say--their way to success lies through some disaster. I do

not feel convinced, if an opportunity or a necessity arose, that men like

Waddington and Ferry would not be among the first to act as civil Moncks.

In the meantime, we shall know in a very few days whether the wisest among

the present ministry will have their way and do the right thing by us in

the Madagascar matter. It will take a little longer to settle the Chinese

difficulty. This can only be done by great sacrifices on the part of the

French. The Chinese will not hurry themselves, and believe they have the

French in their pockets.

_From the Comte de Paris_

Château d'Eu, 3 octobre.

Mon cher Monsieur Reeve,--J'ai reçu votre lettre du 4 septembre à mon

retour de Frohsdorf, mais j'ai eu tant à faire depuis lors que je n'ai

pas, jusqu'à ce jour, trouvé un instant pour vous remercier de la preuve

d'amitié et de sympathie que vous m'avez donnée dans ces circonstances si

graves pour moi. J'ai eu depuis des nouvelles de votre séjour à Broglie et

au Val Richcr par Messieurs Gavard et de Witt, et j'ai bien regretté que

les convenances du deuil ne m'aient pas permis de vous demander cette année

de venir an Château d'Eu. J'aurais été, en effet, fort heureux de pouvoir

causer avec vous de toutes les graves questions qui se posent aujourd'hui

devant nous, tant à l'intérieur qu'à l'extérieur.

Je serai heureux d'en retrouver l'occasion; car, plus les événements

rendent ma situation grave et difficile, plus ils grandissent ma

responsabilité, plus naturellement je tiens à recueillir les avis d'un

observateur éclairé, impartial et bienveillant pour la France. Dans cette

situation si nouvelle, et, je puis dire, sans précédents, je tiens à

resserrer les liens de mes vieilles amitiés, et je tiens particulièrement

à entretenir mes relations avec la société anglaise, ce grand centre

intellectuel qui recueille et juge les affaires du monde entier....

Je vous prie d'offrir mes hommages à Madame et à Mademoiselle Reeve et de

me croire Votre bien affectionné,

PHILIPPE COMTE DE PAEIS.

All the Comte de Paris' earlier letters are signed Louis-Philippe

D'Orleans, the capital D' being a noticeable peculiarity. By the death of

the Comte de Chambord at Frohsdorf on August 24th, the Comte de Paris had

become the head of the Bourbons, [Footnote: Always excepting the impossible

Don Carlos.] and linked the Legitimists and Orleanists in the person of one

capable man. At the same time he changed his signature, as now claiming

the throne by hereditary right. Among the Orleanists, however, there were

many--including the Duc d'Aumale--who considered the change ill-judged,

as implying that his grandfather, Louis Philippe, was a usurper--as,

of course, he was, if the will of the people is to count for nothing.

[Footnote: Cf. _Le Duc d'Aumale_, par Ernest Daudet, pp. 334-5.] Among the

Legitimists, on the other hand, there were many who protested that under

no circumstances could they accept one of the line of Philippe Égalité as

their lawful sovereign. Still, for the next two or three years, it seemed

not impossible that the Comte de Paris might be called to the throne by a

constitutional reaction and a popular vote. He does not seem to have had

any wish to head or stir up a revolution of force and bloodshed.

The Journal records:--

_October 29th_.--To Oxford. Dined at the Deanery. Jowett, Duke of

Buckingham, Max Müller, Brodrick. 31st, dined at All Souls. Sir William

Anson. November 1st, lunched with Max Müller.

_From M. B. St.-Hilaire_

_November 21st_.--I notice that to you, as to me, the situation of France

appears very sad. I conceive that it is a source of alarm to all Europe. We

are falling lower and lower towards the Radicals and the Extreme Left. If

that party should come into power, it would be a very serious threat to the

peace of the world. From the weakness of our Government, everything is to

be feared; and as this weakness must become greater, there does not seem

any remedy in the near future. Notwithstanding our wealth, our finances

are in a bad state, and it is on that side that the inevitable storm will

burst. To ward it off an entire change of conduct would be necessary; and

at the present time we have no one strong enough to guide our policy in the

right direction.

_To Mrs. Parker_

_Foxholes, December 18th_.--If anyone is to write Lord Westbury's Life,

yours is the pen to do it. Nobody expects a daughter to be impartial, or

wishes it. I will see what letters I can find, and will write again when I

have looked over my packets of letters.

This promise was afterwards fulfilled. Lord Westbury's letters were sent to

Mrs. Parker, and several of them, with some of Reeve's, were incorporated

in the 'Life of Lord Westbury' (2 vols. 8vo. 1888), by Mr. T. A. Nash, whom

Mrs. Parker afterwards married.

Early in January 1884, Mrs. Reeve went to Paris, on a visit to Lady

Metcalfe--one of Mr. Dempster's nieces. On the 16th Reeve joined her there.

Among other entries, the Journal notes a breakfast at Chantilly on the

27th--'château finished, galleries splendid'--and on the 30th, dinner at

the Embassy. They returned to London on the 31st. A few dinners in town are

noted, and a visit to Covent Garden on March 5th, to see Salvini in 'King

Lear.' To Foxholes on April 9th.

This meagre chronicle of course gives no idea of Reeve's intellectual

activity at the time, which was really very great. With his official

duties, the conduct of the 'Review,' an extensive correspondence, and, at

this time, the preparation of the second part of the 'Greville Memoirs,'

with dinner parties or receptions three or four times a week, it would seem

as if Reeve's days must have consisted of an abnormal number of hours. And

effectively they did; for, though on pleasure--at proper seasons--Reeve

might be bent, he had always a frugal mind as to the disposal of time.

Most, if not all, of his correspondence, much even of his more serious

work, was got through in spare half-hours at the Council Office; and when

at home, in his study in the house in Rutland Gate, it was a standing rule

that he was not to be disturbed. The study was a cosy room on the ground

floor, built out at the back, and so removed from all noise of passing to

and fro. It had no outlook to distract the attention, and no man was ever

less addicted to day-dreaming. To work whilst he worked and play whilst he

played was the golden rule which enabled Reeve for over fifty years to

get through as much hard work as a successful lawyer, to do as much hard

writing as a successful novelist, to hunt, shoot, or travel whenever

opportunity offered, and to be one of the best known figures in the world

of London society.

_From the Duke of Argyll_

_March 8th_.--Many thanks for your letter. I am pleased to know that the

scientists find my science accurate. Writers in the interest of religion

have generally, of late, been disposed to make as much as possible of the

distinction between man and nature. The speciality of my book [Footnote:

_The Unity of Nature._ There is an article on it in the April number of the

Review.] is, on the contrary, to maintain the unity, as really essential to

all belief, thus going back to the paths of Butler.

_From M. B. St.-Hilaire_

_Paris, 15 avril._--Cher Monsieur Reeve,--J'étais bien sûr de vous faire

plaisir en vous envoyant les discours prononcés sur la tombe de M. Mignet.

Celui de M. Martha est le plus remarquable; M. Jules Simon a très bien

parlé aussi; mais on peut trouver cependant que M. Martha l'emporte.

Je suis très sensible à votre amicale invitation, et je serai heureux de

visiter cet été votre ermitage de Foxholes. Nos vacances commenceront

probablement en août, et je réglerai mes mouvements sur les vôtres.

Je vous remercie de votre bienveillance pour l'Histoire des Animaux; je ne

crois pas que nulle part le génie d'Aristote se soit montré plus grand,

plus scientifique et, l'on peut ajouter, plus moderne. Entre lui et Linné,

Buffon et Cuvier, il n'y a rien. L'histoire de la science a beaucoup à

profiter de cet exemple frappant.

Je suis absolument de votre avis sur le rôle de l'Angleterre en Égypte;

vous n'avez qu'à faire ce que nous avons fait à Tunis, où les choses

marchent à souhait. C'est l'intérêt de votre grand pays, en même temps que

l'intérêt de la civilisation et de l'humanité. Les affaires égyptiennes ne

peuvent rester dans l'état où elles sont; et il faut les régler au plus

vite, pour l'honneur de tout le monde.

Je présente mes hommages bien respectueux a Madame Reeve, en attendant le

petit voyage a Foxholes vers l'automne. Votre bien dévoué,

B. St.-HILAIRE.

And here the Journal notes:--

April 16th.--Edward Cheney died, aetat. 82.

From Dr. Vaughan [Footnote: Then Master of the Temple; he died November 15,

1897, aged 81.]

The Deanery, Llandaff: April 19th.

Dear Mr. Reeve,--I am grateful to you for your kind letter. I will try to

remember to make the reference with which you furnish me when I am again at

the Athenaeum.

The year 1185 is always in my recollection as the date of the consecration

of the Round Church by the Patriarch Heraclius. I am already in

communication with Dr. Hopkins about the musical part of its celebration,

on or about the day (I think February 10) next year. And there must be a

sermon about it on the nearest Sunday. So you see how exactly your thoughts

and mine agree on the subject.

Ever truly yours,

C. J. VAUGHAN.

The other part of the church was consecrated on Ascension Day 1240. Who

will be Master when _that_ seventh centenary comes round?

_From the Duke of Argyll_

Argyll Lodge, Kensington: April 19th.

My Dear Mr. Reeve,[Footnote: Written in pencil.]--I am laid up with a very

sudden and sharp attack of the enemy; but I must write a line from bed to

say how _more_ than satisfied I am by the article in the Review, which goes

straight to the main points of my Essay, and which distinguishes exactly

those which best deserve notice. I am the more grateful as all the others

I have seen--whether laudatory or not--have all been the production of

ignorant men who did not see, or of learned men who did not wish to see,

any of the specialties of the book.

I am better, but unfit for any work.

Yours very truly,

ARGYLL.

_To Mr. T. Norton Longman_

_Foxholes, April 20th_.--Much obliged to you for the Beaconsfield book,

[Footnote: The _Beaconsfield Birthday-Book_.] which is very pretty. I hope

you will sell as many as there are bunches of primroses in Covent Garden

Market. The extent of Lord Beaconsfield's popularity is really curious. Yet

this is the man whom Gladstone hunted to death and called a fiend!!

And the Journal for the summer runs:--

At Foxholes all May.

_June 26th_.--Marriage of Hallam Tennyson and Miss Boyle in Henry VII.'s

Chapel.

_July 12th_.--Dinner at Sir Henry Maine's. The Actons, Lindleys, Evelyn

Barings, Brookfield, Venables--interesting party.

_16th_.--Duchess of Argyll's garden party.

_17th_.--The great Canadian case between the Provinces of Ontario and

Manitoba was argued for six days before the Judicial Committee.

_24th_.--To Foxholes. On August 11th we went to Strode, to see Mr. Gollop,

aetat. 93. 15th, back to Foxholes.

* * * * *

At this time, on behalf of Sir Henry Taylor, Reeve had been conducting a

negotiation with Longmans for the publication of Taylor's Autobiography,

and an agreement had been come to which was to take effect after Taylor's

death.

_From Sir Henry Taylor_

Bournemouth, August 26th.

My dear Mr. Reeve,--Thanks for your very kind letter. I am so glad you can

take a favourable view of my autobiography.

I am rather surprised myself that there is nothing in it of Mrs. Austin

and Lucy. I was intimately acquainted with them, and I may perhaps find

something said of them in letters, as I proceed with the task of sorting

my correspondence. Of Mr. Austin I saw very little. He led such a secluded

life. But one could not see him at all without knowing something of the

intellect which lay hidden in him for so many years.

As to the date of publication, I shall leave the necessary instructions. I

wish the work to be published as soon as possible after my death.

Believe me, yours sincerely,

HENRY TAYLOR.

_From the Comte de Paris_

Château d'Eu, 17 septembre.

Mon cher Monsieur Reeve,--Je ne veux pas tarder un instant à vous remercier

de votre lettre du 14, et des félicitations que vous m'adressez à

l'occasion de la naissance de mon fils Ferdinand.... Grâces à Dieu, tout

s'est passé aussi bien que possible et, depuis l'événement, la mère et

l'enfant vont à merveille. Je vous remercie bien cordialement des voeux que

vous formez pour celui-ci. Je connais de longue date les sentiments qui

vous inspirent, et vous savez tout le prix que j'y attache.

Vous avez raison de dire que l'avenir se montre assez sombre pour toutes

les nations de l'Europe. Les opérations de l'Amiral Courbet au Tonkin et

en Chine montrent que notre marine se maintient à la hauteur de sa

vieille réputation; elle le doit aux traditions, à l'esprit de corps, aux

sentiments de respect pour les chefs qui s'est conservé chez elle tandis

qu'il disparaissait ou s'affaiblissait partout ailleurs. Mais cette

démonstration nous coûte bien cher. La guerre avec la Chine nous alarme,

parce qu'il n'y a pas de guerre plus difficile à terminer que celle-là. La

politique coloniale est un luxe que nous aurions pu nous donner dans un

autre temps, mais que ne nous convient pas dans notre situation européenne.

Elle a de plus été conduite d'une façon irrégulière, l'action au Tonkin

succédant à l'inaction en Egypte. Cette affaire d'Egypte aurait pu servir

de base à une entente avec l'Angleterre. Au lieu de cela on n'a pas voulu

l'aider, puis on a boudé parce qu'elle agissait seule, et lorsque les

difficultés ont commencé pour elle, on n'a su ni s'entendre absolument

pour agir en commun, ni s'effacer derrière l'Europe pour ne pas assumer la

responsabilité de l'echec de la conférence. Bien des gens croient ici que

toute cette politique a eu pour but de sauver le ministère Gladstone. Cela

n'en valait pas la peine. Il en est résulté de l'aigreur dans les journaux.

Mais cette aigreur sent bien un peu le fonds des reptiles, et personne n'a

sérieusement envie de chercher querelle à la perfide Albion.

Ceux qui admirent ses institutions et qui croient que leur pondération est

la garantie du plus précieux de tous les biens--la liberté, se préoccupent

vivement des tendances jacobines de notre ami Gladstone. L'extension du

suffrage est logique, l'anéantissement de la chambre des Lords est logique.

Mais les meilleures institutions ne sont pas les plus logiques. À force de

logique on tend à remplacer le gouvernement pondéré de l'Angleterre par ce

que nous appelons le gouvernement conventionnel, c'est à dire le despotisme

d'une Assemblée unique appuyée sur la brutale loi du nombre. Que Dieu vous

garde d'un tel avenir. C'est le voeu d'un ami sincère de vos institutions.

Ce qui préoccupe ici bien plus, et à bon titre, que les aventures

coloniales, c'est la situation économique. La France s'appauvrit parce

qu'elle perd en impôts improductifs une partie de son épargne, parce que

ses fils travaillent moins, dépensent plus et boivent davantage, parce

qu'ils demandent des salaires trop élevés, et parce que la concurrence

allemande, américaine, italienne, anglaise, nous ferme peu à peu tous les

marchés, et enfin parce que le phylloxera ruine la moitié du pays. Le

courant protectionniste se prononce avec une force irrésistible en ce

moment.

Je vous prie d'offrir mes hommages à Madame et à Mademoiselle Reeve, et de

me croire Votre bien affectionné,

PHILIPPE COMTE DE PARIS.

_From M. B. St.-Hilaire_

Paris, 19 octobre.

Cher Monsieur Reeve,--J'ai reçu le numéro de la _Revue d'Edimbourg_, et je

vous en remercie. Le rédacteur de l'article a été plein de bienveillance à

mon égard, et je vous prie de lui faire savoir que je suis fort touché de

l'appréciation qu'il veut bien faire de mes travaux. Je profiterai de ses

justes critiques pour mes autres traductions; mais il est un point où je ne

suis pas tout à fait d'accord avec lui. Je ne trouve pas qu'il tienne assez

compte à Aristote d'avoir commencé la science, et de l'avoir fondée.

Les débuts sont toujours excessivement difficiles, et il ne serait pas

équitable de demander à ces temps reculés de savoir tout ce que nous savons

aujourd'hui. Nous devons toujours nous dire que dans deux mille ans d'ici

on en saura beaucoup plus que nous, tout savants que nous sommes. Ceci doit

nous engager à être reconnaissants et modestes.

Je vais mettre sous presse le Traité des Parties des Animaux en deux

volumes, et je prépare celui de la Génération, qui, sans doute, en aura

trois.

J'espère que vous vous portez bien, ainsi que Madame Henry Reeve; je lui

présente mes respects et mes amitiés, avec tons mes voeux pour sa santé et

pour la vôtre.

Votre bien dévoué,

B. ST.-HILAIRE.

The Journal here has:--

_October 28th_.--Dinner of The Club to Lord Dufferin before his departure

for India.

_November 14th_.--Dinner at Lady Molesworth's to the Waddingtons.

_December 3rd_.--Small dinner at Lord Cork's, with Gladstone and Sir H.

James.

_From Sir Henry Taylor_

Bournemouth, December 10th.

Dear Mr. Reeve,--It has come into the head of my family, and through theirs

into mine, that there is no particular reason why my Autobiography should

not be published now, instead of posthumously, and that there are some

motives for giving a preference to present publication. The agreement

with Messrs. Longman which you brought about has been, perhaps, a sort of

suggestion of this change of purpose; so I write to mention it. The work

was written with more unreserve than would be natural to a man who hears

what he says, and some erasures will be required; but a man in his

eighty-fifth year is, in some respects, as good as dead, or, at all

events, as deaf: so there need not be much alteration. I hope you will not

disapprove.

Believe me, yours very sincerely,

HENRY TAYLOR.

On December 17th the Reeves went to Foxholes, where they spent Christmas,

ushered in the New Year, and returned to London on January 15th, 1885. The

entries in the Journal are for the most part trivial, though politically

the year was one of extreme interest and excitement, much of which is

reflected in the correspondence.

_From the Comte de Paris_

6 _janvier_.--J'ai été vivement touché de la lettre que vous m'avez écrite,

des voeux que vous m'adressez au moment où nous entrons dans une année qui

semble nous réserver bien des surprises. L'avenir est plein d'incertitudes

et de dangers. Je n'ai pas besoin de vous dire que j'observe avec une

sérieuse inquiétude l'état des relations entre l'Angleterre et la France,

non que je croie même à la possibilité d'un conflit qui répugnerait

également à tous les membres des deux nations voisines, mais parce qu'une

hostilité diplomatique seule serait déjà un grand malheur pour l'une et

pour l'autre.... Vous avez raison de croire que le désir universel de la

paix prévaudra sur les périls de la situation internationale. Ce désir

est bien puissant en France, et les aventures de l'extrême Orient, dans

lesquelles on nous a lancés si mal à propos, ne font que lui donner

l'occasion de se manifester.

Ces aventures ne font pas diversion à la crise si grave qui éprouve notre

industrie et notre agriculture. Les causes de cette crise sont multiples.

Quelques-unes sont communes à toute l'Europe, d'autres le sont aux quelques

nations qui avaient le monopole de certaines industries, et le

perdent, grâce aux facilités actuelles des transports. Il en est une,

malheureusement très-active, qui nous est propre; c'est la tendance des

ouvriers depuis l'établissement de la Rèpublique à chercher l'amélioration

de leur sort, moins dans l'accroissement de leur salaire que dans la

diminution de leur travail. Cette funeste tendance leur a été inspirée

par les flatteries de tous ceux qui briguent leurs suffrages, et leur

rappellent que toute législation émane d'eux. Le pays produit moins, et

par conséquent s'appauvrit. L'imprévoyance de nos gouvernants a aggravé

la crise. Aujourd'hui un cri puissant s'élève en faveur des droits

protecteurs, même sur le blé. Il est probable qu'on en fera assez pour

inquiéter les consommateurs des villes, pas assez pour satisfaire

l'agriculture.... Si Mademoiselle Reeve voulait faire de jolies pêches de

truites, c'est le 1er juin qu'elle devrait venir à Eu.

_From the Duke of Argyll_

_Inveraray, February 13th_.--The Nile affair is too miserable. No possible

issue can be otherwise than a misfortune. The despatch in which the

Government asked Gordon to advise them how to relieve him--in April last,

when he was closely beleaguered--reads like a horrible joke now.

A horrible joke indeed:--for on February 5th news had come of the fall of

Khartoum and the death of Gordon. On the 26th a vote of censure on the

Government was carried in the House of Lords by 189 to 63; but a similar

motion in the Commons was rejected by 302 to 288. The Government majority

had fallen from 56 to 14.

On March 8th a special service was held in the Temple Church to commemorate

the completion of the seventh century since its consecration. [Footnote:

See _ante_, p. 322.] The Master preached the sermon on the text Psalm xc.

1--'Lord, thou hast been our dwelling place in all generations.' [Footnote:

The _Times_ of March 9th gave a pretty full abstract of the sermon.] Reeve,

who was present, considered it one of Dr. Vaughan's happiest efforts,

and wrote to say how greatly he had been pleased by it. Vaughan's

acknowledgement of the kindly feeling which dictated the letter has

otherwise no particular interest.

_From Sir Alfred Lyall_ [Footnote: At that time lieutenant-governor of the

North-West Provinces.]

_March 31st_.--When we closed in 1881 the second act of the Affghan drama,

I calculated on an interval of at least five years; and I thought that if

we could get a joint commission to settle some boundary that Russia could

provisionally agree to, the interval might be longer. But the Boundary

Commission, which I first pressed for in 1881, has propelled, instead of

delaying, the crisis. I suppose our Egyptian entanglement seemed to Russia

to offer an irresistible opportunity; at any rate, the Russians have some

reason for precipitating the issue between us, and at this moment we may be

on the verge of a war. It is very curious to find ourselves so close to the

collision that we have been so long trying to fend off, and to realise that

a land invasion of India by a European Power, which has been the nightmare

of Anglo-Indian statesmen since Bonaparte seized Egypt in 1798, is now no

longer a matter of remote speculation. The Russian menace is, however,

already producing one result that I had always anticipated; it is evoking

among all substantial classes of Indians a strong desire to support the

British Government in India. You may remember that in my paper of January

1884 I wrote that the natives would, in times of rumoured invasion, hold by

any Power that could keep the gates of India against Central Asia; and this

is now strongly showing itself. The adventurous classes are ready to

enlist and follow our colours; the propertied classes look to us as the

representatives of order and security; the educated classes depend wholly

upon our system; if the Russians calculate on any serious rising against

us in India, they will be mistaken. Of course a series of reverses would

change the whole face of affairs.... We are very fortunate in having Lord

Dufferin here at this time. Everyone likes him, and has confidence in him.

He is clearly a Viceroy who listens to everyone, but makes up his own mind

independently. And Lady Dufferin charms us all....

The Mahdi's fortunes do not interest India. The talk in some of the papers

about the necessity of smashing him, in order to avert the risk of some

general Mahomedan uprising, is futile and imaginative. The Indians think

the English rather mad to go crusading against him in the Soudan, and they

may soon get irritated at the waste of Indian lives at Suakin, when we want

our best men on the N.W. frontier; but, for the rest, they do not concern

themselves about remote Arab tribes. Of course everyone sees that the

English Government has now an excellent pretext for getting partially out

of a hopeless mess by transferring most of our English troops from the Red

Sea to the Punjab.

* * * * *

On April 9th news reached London that on March 30th the Russians, under

General Komaroff, had attacked and carried the Affghan positions at

Penjdeh, concerning which negotiations were going on. As our Government was

pledged meanwhile to the support of the Amir, this action of Komaroff's was

held to be a very aggravated insult to England. Explanations were demanded,

but preparations for war were hurried on, and on April 27th, after an

impassioned speech by Mr. Gladstone, a vote of credit for eleven millions

was passed almost by acclamation. The negotiations, however, were

continued; explanations were given: the Russians kept Penjdeh; the Affghans

had lost their territory, their guns, and 500 men; and Mr. Gladstone

expressed himself satisfied. Four days afterwards, May 8th, the Government

was defeated on the budget, and resigned a few days later, the Marquis of

Salisbury forming the new ministry.

_From Sir Alfred Lyall_

_June 5th_.--Probably you know more in England than we do in India of the

course of negotiations with Russia, It seems just now more smooth than

satisfactory. I fear we have lost credit in India over that unlucky Penjdeh

business. One would fancy that our representatives on the spot might have

been wary enough to discern that where the Russians and the Affghans were

drawing close to each other, there lay the risk and the strain of the

situation. I have a very moderate trust in our ally the Amir, though he is

a very able, if unscrupulous, ruler. I hope fervently he has sense enough

not to use those breech-loaders we are sending in such quantities, and that

he won't repeat the Penjdeh blunder by provoking some collision with the

Russians on his border....

India is very quiet. The Russian scare of the spring has turned rather to

our advantage, as I always prophesied it would, by bringing home to the

natives their dependence on England for protection from foreign invasion.

_From Sir Henry Taylor_

_Bournemouth, July 14th_.--I have just read the excellent article in the

'Edinburgh Review' on my Autobiography; and as there is no amount of

kindness on your part which I cannot believe in, I am disposed to think

that it is you who have written it. [Footnote: It was written by Reeve.]

Whoever it is, I should like him to know that I am very thankful.

_From Sir Alfred Lyall_

_August 1st_--India is now perfectly quiet; but the new generation of

hungry, ambitious, English-speaking natives are persuading themselves

that they can have all the benefits of English rule without the burden of

English officialism. If they are encouraged and supported by the English

_Demos_, there will be confusion before long.

* * * * *

On August 14th Parliament was prorogued, with the clear understanding that

the dissolution would follow. This, however, was put off for three months,

during which time the country was turned upside down by the excitement of

the electoral campaign and the unbridled license which many of the most

distinguished candidates permitted themselves; rank Socialism, the

abolition of property, 'three acres and a cow,' being freely spoken of by

the irresponsible, and hinted at, in no obscure language, by some who had

borne office in the Gladstone ministry. By a curious coincidence, the

French elections were nearly synchronous with ours, and the results were

keenly watched by one, at least, of Reeve's correspondents. But of all this

excitement and agitation the Journal has no trace. The only entries of any

interest are:--

Foxholes: very hot: no rain for two months.

_August 22nd_.--Excursion to Studland with the Denisons, Lord Canterbury,

and Prothero.

_26th_.--To Malvern with Hopie; 27th, Worcester; 28th, Tewkesbury; 29th,

Hereford Cathedral; then Boss, Monmouth, and Chepstow.

_September 1st_.--Chepstow Castle, Tintern Abbey, then to Clifton across

the Severn. 2nd, rain, so returned to Foxholes.

_From the Comte de Paris_

18 _septembre_.--Je m'empresse de vous remercier de votre lettre du 15, qui

m'est parvenue hier. Vous savez avec quel plaisir je reçois toujours de

vos nouvelles, avec quel intérêt je lis toujours vos appreciations sur la

situation de nos deux pays. Malgré de bien grandes différences dans l'état

politique, qui sont tout à l'avantage du vôtre, et dans l'état social, qui

le sont peut-étre moins, ces deux situations ne sont pas sans analogies.

Les modérés, de part et d'autre, comme vous le dites, semblent être

peu écoutés, et cependant je suis persuadé que leurs vues finiront par

l'emporter des deux côtés du détroit, parce que, sous une surface agitée en

apparence, aucune passion violente ne bouillonne dans l'une ou l'autre des

deux nations. Vous avez devant vous le grand inconnu de la nouvelle loi

électorale; dangereux, parce que l'omnipotence de la Chambre des Communes,

favorable au gouvernement parlementaire lorsque cette Chambre se recrutait

exclusivement dans la haute classe et en avait l'esprit, pourra être un

instrument redoutable pour la liberté et pour toute l'organisation sociale

le jour où MM. Chamberlain, Parnell et Bradlaugh auront chacun un parti

derrière eux. Heureusement pour vous, l'institution monarchique vous

permettra de traverser la crise qu'entraînera la modification de la

composition et de l'esprit de la Chambre des Communes. Grâce à cette

institution, l'esprit politique du pays pourra rétablir l'équilibre entre

les pouvoirs publics. En France, l'expérience de la République démocratique

et pacifique s'est faite dans les conditions les plus favorables, et a

échoué. Elle n'est ni conservatrice ni réformatrice. Tout en restant

bourgeoise, elle est pardessus tout prodigue. Les classes qui payent

l'impôt sont parfaitement édifiées sur son compte; celles qui nele

payent pas, et qui votent cependant, sont frappées indirectement par

l'appauvrissement national et commencent à s'étonner que la République,

dont le nom les flatte encore, réponde si mal à leur attente. La République

reste bourgeoise parce que le suffrage universel est trop défiant pour

chercher des représentants dans le sein de la classe la plus nombreuse.

Mais il n'est pas difficile dans les choix qu'il fait dans les rangs d'une

classe plus élevée. Le niveau intellectuel et moral des Assemblées qu'il

élit s'abaisse à chaque renouvellement. C'est un fait qu'il faudra accepter

désormais comme inévitable, et dont il faudra tenir compte dans l'avenir.

La République est essentiellement prodigue parce que, toute la machine

gouvernementale reposant sur l'élection, les ministres sont obligés de

donner aux deputés des places innombrables pour satisfaire la foule encore

plus nombreuse de leurs agents électoraux, et de permettre des travaux, des

dépenses exagérés dans chaque arrondissement, ici pour favoriser le député

républicain, là pour nuire au député conservateur. C'est par là qu'elle

périra, parce que le mal est sans remède et s'aggrave chaque jour. Loi

générale d'ailleurs. C'est par les finances que périssent les gouvernements

définitivement condamnés: témoin l'ancien regime. Cette mort-là est sans

résurrection.

Le caractère nouveau de la période électorale qui s'est ouverte

pratiquement depuis quelques mois est le réveil des Conservateurs. Ils

comprennent enfin qu'ils peuvent et doivent lutter pour défendre la société

menacée, les richesses nationales compromises. Ils apportent à cette lutte

une ardeur tout à fait nouvelle. Depuis deux ans [Footnote: Since the death

of the Comte de Chambord.] je me suis efforcé de faire comprendre à nos

amis que la politique avait sub les mêèmes transformations que la guerre;

que, pour gagner la victoire sur le terrain politique, il ne fallait rien

laisser au hasard, rien confier aux petites coteries; qu'il fallait agir

avec de gros bataillons, et que, pour les mouvoir il fallait un système de

mobilisation aussi parfait que celui de l'armée allemande. Ces conseils ont

été suivis, et les monarchistes se sont préparés à entreprendre la

lutte électorale avec une organisation de comités de départeméent,

d'arrondissement et de canton, appuyés le plus souvent sur des réunions

plénières qui marquent un grand changement dans la vie politique du parti

conservateur. Cette organisation se perfectionnera dans les élections

mêmes. Elle doit donner un jour, et par l'élection et par l'action plus

puissante encore de l'opinion publique, le pouvoir à ceux qui l'auront

constituée et qui sauront s'en servir.

A la veille des elections... tandis que tous les autres partis faisaient

faire leur programme par un petit comité parisien, craignant qu'une grande

réunion ne trahît leurs divisions, les monarchistes ont envoyé des quatre

coins de la France des délégués qui, tous animés du même esprit, ont adopté

par acclamation le programme soumis à leur approbation. Je dois même dire

que nous avons tous été frappés de leur extrême modération. Pas une voix ne

s'est élevée pour réclamer en faveur d'un ton plus aggressif. Le programme,

retouché sur place par une commission de neuf membres, avait, vous le

pensez bien, été soigneusement préparé d'avance; toutes les expressions en

avaient été pesées. Aussi suis-je heureux qu'il ait eu l'approbation d'un

aussi bon juge que vous.

21 _septembre_.--Depuis gue je vous al écrit, j'ai lu le grand manifeste

de M. Gladstone. De celui-là, on ne peut pas dire qu'il brille par la

modération. Il y a des phrases redoutables et effrayantes à l'adresse de la

richesse et de la propriété, base de la société. Jamais je n'aurais cru le

Gladstone que j'ai connu capable de parler de la Chambre des pairs comme il

le fait. Et cependant, une profonde modification dans la composition de

la Chambre Haute ne sera-t-elle pas un jour le salut de la cause et des

intérêts conservateurs en Angleterre? Si cette Chambre se retrempe au

moins partiellement dans l'élection, elle y trouvera, peut-être, une force

capable de lui assurer dans le gouvernement une part au moins égale à celle

de la Chambre des Communes, au moment où celle-ci baissera en valeur morale

proportionnellement à l'extension du suffrage....

En ce moment, il serait bien désirable, également en France et en

Angleterre, de voir les modérés de nuances diverses se rapprocher, pour

former un véritable parti conservateur: chez vous, anciens whigs et anciens

tories; chez nous, les centres droits et les centres gauches. Mais c'est

entre ceux qui sont le plus rapprochés en politique que le souvenir des

luttes passées laisse les plus profondes rancunes.

* * * * *

The Journal notes:--

_October 12th_--Went to town for the Riel [Footnote: Louis Riel had

stirred up a rebellion in Manitoba, had been captured, tried, and sentenced

to death. He appealed, and the case thus came before the Judicial

Committee. On October 22nd the appeal was dismissed, and on November 16th

Riel was duly hanged at Regina.] case. Dined with Captain Bridge [Footnote:

Now Rear-Admiral Bridge, lately commander-in-chief on the Australian

station.] at the United Service Club.

_14th_.--Second part of 'Greville' published; 2,700 copies subscribed.

* * * * *

In comparison with the tremendous excitement caused by the publication of

the first part of the Greville Memoirs, the second part attracted little

notice, although large sales testified to the interest it raised. Reeve

mentions 2,700 as the number of copies subscribed for: but the first

edition of 4,000 was exhausted almost immediately, and a second large

edition was sold out within a few months.

_To Lord Derby_

_Foxholes, October 28th_--I am much obliged to you for your note. We might

elect three new members of The Club, because there remain two vacancies

caused by the honorary list, besides the death of Houghton. I should very

much like to see Edward Stanhope and Harry Holland in The Club. They are

among the most rising men of the day--accomplished and agreeable--and their

fathers were respectively two of our most faithful members. We should,

I think, choose men from the younger generation, for many of us are

frightfully old. It is more difficult to point out eligible men in the

literary or scientific world. To say the truth, there is a remarkable

dearth of distinguished authors. Violent politicians are objectionable.

I am very much gratified by what you say of the new volumes of Greville's

Journals. Your estimate of their value exactly coincides with my own. I am

happy to say that I have not yet heard that anyone is annoyed or offended.

I sent a copy to Henry Ponsonby, who laid it before the Queen, but I have

not heard what sentence Her Majesty has passed upon me.

There is a great deal of political noise, but very little light. In the

south of England I think the Conservatives will carry a good many seats. If

I were to venture on a prognostic, I should say that the opposition will

have a majority in Great Britain, though by no means so large a one as the

Radicals expect. The effect of this would be that the Irish can turn the

scale, and I think Mr. Parnell would refuse, for the present, to turn out

the present Government in order to bring in Mr. Gladstone. In that case,

the existence of the present ministry may be prolonged for some time, but

it would be on sufferance and by Irish support. On the other hand, if a

Liberal Government were formed, it could only exist with the support of the

Irish vote. Eventually, I hope, this anomalous state of things may bring

the moderate men of both the British parties together, and throw both

extremes into opposition. That, I am convinced, is the real wish of the

country, and the obstacles to such a combination are chiefly personal.

I fancy the next parliaments will be very impracticable and probably

shortlived.

_From the Comte de Paris_

22 _novembre._--Je vous remercie de ce que vous me dites à propos des

Mémoires de M. Greville. [Footnote: Sc. that there were passages in it not

complimentary to the Orleans family.]

Je comprends parfaitement que vous ne pouviez supprimer certains passages

dont vous ne voulez cependant pas assumer la solidarité. Ces passages

ne m'empêcheront pas de lire avec intérêt la suite des oeuvres de cet

observateur peu bien-veillant, mais fin et spirituel.

Ne croyez pas que je vous écrive avec d'autre pensée que de faire part de

mes vues à un êtranger qui connaît, comprend et aime la France.

On November 18th Parliament was dissolved by proclamation and the elections

were held from the 23rd to December 18th. In the English towns, where the

elections were first held, the Conservatives had a large majority, and it

seemed as if they were going to sweep the board. In the counties, however,

the 'three acres and a cow' was taken by the ignorant rustics, just

admitted to the franchise, as a splendid reality, and their votes went

strongly in favour of the Liberals, or rather--as it would be more correct

to say--the Radicals. Mr. Gladstone had appealed to the country to give him

a working majority. He had, in fact, a majority of eighty-four over the

Conservatives; but the Irish, or so-called Nationalist, party numbered

eighty-six; and as these were bound by their bond of union to oppose the

Government, whatever it was, they had to be counted with the Conservatives

as soon as the Conservative Government had fallen. And the comparison of

the numbers showed that it must fall as soon as Parliament met. As Reeve

had forecast, neither party could form an effective administration without

the support of the Nationalists, a position which seemed for the moment to

render them the arbiters of the nation's destiny.

_From Count Vitzthum_

Paris, December 1st.

Dear Mr. Reeve,--Many thanks for your kind letter. You will find me here

in my winter quarters until the end of May, then from June to the end of

October at Baden-Baden, where we have built a villa. I would always be

happy to see you and talk over old times.

I have just finished reading the third volume of Greville's Memoirs and

have been very much struck by your notes, without which some passages would

not have been intelligible. Old Greville was a portrait-painter rather in

Rembrandt's style. In putting together all he says of Palmerston, Peel, and

the Duke of Wellington, very remarkable full-length portraits would come

out. He seems rather partial for John Russell.

My little book makes more noise in Germany than I expected. W. Oncken, the

celebrated historian of Austria and Prussia in 1813, will review it for

the 'Allgemeine Zeitung,' and the Vienna press has been unexpectedly

favourable. An English friend of mine wants to translate it. I think it

would be 'love's labour lost;' for everybody who cares for such trifles and

photographs taken on the spot understands German nowadays in England, and

will prefer the original. Still, if you thought it worth your while to send

a short notice to the 'Times,' it would be a favour. My old friend Delane

is no more, else I should have asked him. Cotta writes me that he has

secured the English copyright, and sent some copies to the principal

Reviews and the 'Times.' Believe me, very faithfully yours,

VITZTHUM.

_From the Comte de Paris_

Château d'Eu, 9 décembre.

Mon cher Monsieur Reeve,--Un de mes amis va partir pour la Belgique. Je

tiens à en profiter pour lui confier une lettre à votre adresse, qu'il

mettra à la poste chez nos voisins. En effet, je connais par expérience

I'indiscrétion dont la poste française a pris la mauvaise habitude sous

l'Empire, habitude qu'elle n'a pas perdue sous la République. J'ai hâte de

vous remercier de votre lettre du lr qui m'a vivement intéressé. J'ai été

un peu confus d'apprendre l'usage que vous aviez fait de la mienne, car

je l'avais écrite au courant de la plume, et uniquement pour me donner le

plaisir de causer avec vous. Mais, puisque vous l'avez trouvée bonne à

montrer, je m'en rapporte à votre amitié, et j'espère qu'elle n'a pas été

trop indulgente. Je suis d'ailleurs fort heureux d'avoir quelquefois, par

votre intermédiaire, des relations avec Lord Salisbury, pour le caractère

et le talent duquel j'ai toujours eu une si haute estime, et que j'aime

d'ailleurs toujours à considérer comme mon proche voisin de campagne.

The success of the Conservatives in the towns, their defeat in the country,

is the very opposite of what is taking place here; so that we foreigners

must exercise great reserve in giving an opinion on the political situation

created in England by these last elections. It is, however, evident

that there, as everywhere else, the old parties are in process of

disintegration, and that, in a new social state, in presence of new

problems, a new distribution of parties is called for. In the history of

all nations there are periods when the need of political progress renders

it necessary for the reformers to remain long in power; and if from time to

time they yield it to their adversaries, it should only be for long enough

to recover breath in climbing the long ascent. On the other hand, there

are also periods when the wearied people long for repose; when progress no

longer aims at completeness, but at change; when reforms are mere Utopian

fancies or appeals to evil passions; and when the partisans of the _status

quo_ ought to have the direction of affairs for as long a time as possible.

I believe that we are now entering on one of these periods. But it becomes

the duty of the Conservatives to defend existing institutions by taking the

initiative in such modifications as may be necessary. This is what, with a

true political insight, they have always done in England. The vote of the

counties does not affect the justice of your appreciation of the general

character of the elections. It is not a return to the old Tory party, but

rather the condemnation of the Radical programme; and from this point of

view they have an international importance which nothing can weaken. All

the same, this vote of the counties seems to me to render absolutely

necessary the modification of parties which the complete success of the

Ministry would have postponed. After the redistribution of seats, there

is need of a redistribution of persons and of political groupings. Either

Parliament will be controlled by the Irish Nationalists, and Ireland by Mr.

Parnell, or, in opposition to the Nationalists and the Radicals, there will

be formed a Government which will be Conservative in its respect for

the great social institutions, in its antagonism to the levelling and

centralising spirit, and withal Liberal in the manner in which it will

handle the agrarian question.

Judging by what I see here, where over three millions of rural proprietors

are 'a tower of strength' for the Conservatives, I am persuaded that in

England also the Conservatives have no greater interest--after the defeat

of the socialist and revolutionary plans of Mr. Chamberlain--than to work

vigorously at the formation of a numerous class of small landowners.

_Mutatis mutandis_, we have here also the corresponding phenomenon of the

transformation of parties. We are unquestionably entering on a period of

lassitude. The Conservatives have gained one hundred and twenty seats at

the last elections, for four principal reasons, all of which spring from

the faults of their adversaries.

1. The Tonkin expedition.

2. The waste of the national and municipal finances.

3. The aggravation of the agricultural and industrial crises by the gross

errors in the conclusion of treaties of commerce and the establishment of

transit tariffs.

4. The war on the clergy, foreshadowing the separation of Church and State.

To these particular reasons must be added the general dissatisfaction with

an administration at once weak and corrupt, which is not in accord with

those instincts which a thousand years of monarchy have impressed on our

manners and tone of thought.

The moderate Republicans have been beaten because they allied themselves

with the Radicals, and because they themselves have not shown the governing

qualities which could gain the confidence of the country. If the check

has not been still greater, it is because the country has a horror of all

change; because the interest of the Government is exceedingly strong;

because the electors do not care to vote for the opposition candidate, who

cannot do anything for them; and lastly, because, at the second _tour de

scrutin_, the Government, in the most shameless manner, brought pressure to

bear on all who are directly or indirectly dependent on it, the number of

whom is very great.

We have then two hundred Conservatives deputies, who represent three and a

half millions of electors. Three-fourths of these are Monarchists more or

less avowed; one-fourth represents the Bonapartist element, and among these

last are many with whom I have well-established personal relations. It is

not, however, the part of this large minority to set forth any opinions as

to the form of the Government, nor even to cause obstruction; still less to

ally itself with the Radicals for the vain satisfaction of overturning the

Ministry. Its aim must always be to promote the passing of Conservative

laws, and by every possible means to oppose such Radical measures as will

be proposed to the Chamber. It is for this that it has been elected. If it

fulfils its task aright, when the dissolution comes--and this cannot be

far off--it will reap the fruits of its policy. It will have merited

the country's confidence, which the Radicals will have lost; and,

notwithstanding the pressure, perhaps even the violence of the Government,

the current of public opinion will be so strong that it will send a

Conservative majority to the Palais Bourbon. Under the influence of this

current we may hope to see the collective or individual conversion of

the moderate Republicans, which must lead to the reconstruction of the

Conservative party and to placing the direction of it in the hands of the

Monarchists. For, though by temperament these moderate Republicans ought

to be the last to come to us, the Radical danger must bring them; they are

bound to come; their place is marked in our ranks. They will never go to

Bonapartism: on the contrary, they will one day enable us to rid ourselves

of the _intransigeunt_ element which forms a disturbing minority in the

party.

This will be the work of to-morrow. To-day, the principal task which I

recommend to my friends is the reconstitution, or rather the creation, of

the 'active list' of the Conservative array. We have the model in Belgium.

People are beginning to understand that the Conservatives cannot remain for

ever on the sufferance of the Government. No Government shall he stable

but that which they can support. For this they must form a compact and

well-organised party. Encouraged by the results of the elections, every one

has set to work with new ardour. My only trouble at present is the utter

inexperience of the Conservative minority. It is made up of men almost all

of whom are new to Parliament, are unacquainted with each other, and as

yet are without a leader. I reckon, however, that such blunders as it may

commit will be balanced and amended by those of its opponents.

Je tennine sur cette pensée consolante, et je vous prie de me croire.

Votre bien affectionné,

PHILIPPE COMTE DE PARIS.

It is interesting to compare with this another view of the French elections

and of the probable course of events, taken from a very different

standpoint.

_From the Due de Broglie_

8 _novembre_.--Vous avez vu le rèsultat de nos élections, qui ont été plus

heureuses pour la cause générale du parti conservateur que pour ce qui me

regarde particulièrement. Si nous ne vivions pas dans un temps oú toutes

les prévisions sont trompées par une certaine inertie générale qui amortit

toutes les passions et ralentit le cours naturel des événements, je

croirais qu'une crise violente est assez prochaine, les éléments extrêmes

se trouvant réums et rapprochés dans l'Assemblée nouvelle, de manière à

former un mélange explosible comme la chimie redoute d'en amener. De part

ni d'autre, d'ailleurs, il n'y a d'homme en état de diriger les événements;

ils iront done probablement tout seuls, commes des chevaux qui n'ont pas de

cocher, ce qui est le moyen à peu près sûr d'aller dans le fossé.

Memoirs of the Life and Correspondence of Henry Reeve, C.B., D.C.L. In Two Volumes. Volume II. · 第 9 / 11 章