their mortality directly attributed to alcoholism being less than
one-third, and that from liver disease being only two-thirds, of that
of occupied males generally. In this respect they scarcely differ from
farm labourers; their mortality from alcoholism is the same, and that
from liver disease is only slightly higher.
Miners, as a class, suffer less than other occupied males from
phthisis, as well as from cancer and diabetes, their mortality from the
first-mentioned disease being below the average by 41 per cent., from
the second by 16 per cent., and from the last by 29 per cent. Among
miners, diseases of the nervous, circulatory, and urinary systems are
less fatal than the average, but, with few exceptions, respiratory
diseases are more fatal.
_Coal Miners._--As a class, colliers compare favourably with men
in most other occupations on the score of health. During the first
thirty years of the main working period of life their mortality is
substantially lower than is the mortality in other industries, although
at ages under twenty and over fifty-five they die faster than the
average.
The excessive mortality of colliers under twenty years of age may be
accounted for by the fact that from 40 to 50 per cent. of the total
deaths are due to violence, caused by the waggons and “tubs” in which
coals are conveyed from the underground workings to the shafts. This
form of accident falls mainly to the lot of the younger and less
experienced colliers who are employed in “tramming” and “hurrying” the
coals. When their mortality from accident is deducted, the residual
death-rate of colliers under twenty years of age does not greatly
differ from the average.
The comparative mortality figure of colliers, without distinction of
age, from all causes including accidents, averages 925; but whilst on
the one hand it does not exceed 727 among the colliers of Derbyshire
and Nottingham, and 774 among those of Durham and Northumberland, on
the other hand it ranges upwards to 1069 among colliers in Lancashire
and 1145 in Monmouthshire and South Wales.
It is not easy to explain why it is that colliers in the several
coalfields, working as they do in the same material, and spending an
equal portion of the day underground, should differ so widely from
one another in their mortality. For example, on reference to the
accompanying table we see, with regard to miners under twenty years
of age, that whilst on the one hand, among colliers in the counties
of Derby and Nottingham, and also in Stafford, the mortality is lower
than among “occupied males” by 7 and 5 per cent. respectively; on the
other hand, among colliers in Durham and Northumberland, the mortality
exceeds that standard by 54 per cent., in Lancashire by 63 per cent.,
and in Monmouthshire and South Wales by not less than 127 per cent.
Again, in the counties of Derby and Nottingham colliers between their
fifty-fifth and sixty-fifth years die less rapidly than the average
by 4 per cent., but colliers of the same age in Staffordshire die
more rapidly than the average by 35 per cent., and in Lancashire and
Monmouthshire more rapidly by 40 per cent.
Various theories have been advanced to account for the great disparity
just alluded to in the local death-rates among colliers. In the first
place, we know that coal-pits differ greatly in geological character,
in depth, in the grittiness or dustiness of the rock which has to be
worked in order to get at the coal, in the amount and composition
of gas present, in the quantity of water permeating the strata, in
the thickness of the coal seams, in the temperature of the workings;
and last, but most important, in the perfection or otherwise of the
ventilation of the coal-pit. Again, it is known that the habits and
consequently the health and comfort of coal miners vary extremely
according as the colliery is situate in a country district, or, as is
frequently the case especially in the Lancashire coalfields, in what is
practically an urban district, perhaps bordering on a large town. These
variations in the circumstances of life are certainly sufficient to
account for wide differences in the health and longevity of coal miners.
Aged colliers, wherever they are employed, sustain a mortality which
is considerably in excess of the standard; yet even among them the
mortality varies greatly with locality. For whereas in the counties of
Derby and Nottingham the mortality of colliers aged sixty-five years
and upwards exceeds that of occupied males by 18 per cent., the excess
amounts to 50 per cent. in Lancashire, 52 per cent. in Durham and
Northumberland, and 80 per cent. in Staffordshire.
In the list of principal causes of death amongst colliers there are two
diseases which have been the subject of exceptional comment, both in
this country and abroad--namely, pulmonary phthisis on the one hand,
and ordinary inflammatory diseases of the lung on the other. Almost all
writers on the subject, whether in recent or in earlier years, agree
in attributing to colliers an unusually low mortality from tubercular,
and a correspondingly high mortality from non-tubercular, disease of
the lungs. The accompanying table, which gives statistics for the years
1890–92, confirms the general opinion. Thus, taking coal miners in the
aggregate we find that their mortality ascribed to phthisis is only
about half of that to which other occupied males are subject, whilst
their mortality from respiratory diseases exceeds the same standard
by 21 per cent. If we take farm labourers as a standard by which the
mortality of colliers should be judged, we find that whilst colliers
suffer from fatal phthisis in the proportion of 97 as against 115 for
farm labourers, colliers die rather more than twice as rapidly from
diseases of the respiratory system other than phthisis. Although, as
has already been stated, colliers as a class enjoy special immunity
from pulmonary phthisis, nevertheless the disease prevails amongst
them very unequally. The highest mortality figures from phthisis
among colliers are 123 in the West Riding of Yorkshire and 107 in
Monmouthshire, whilst the figures do not exceed 83 in Staffordshire and
69 in Derbyshire. In no English county does the mortality of colliers
from phthisis even approach 185, which is the figure for occupied males
in the aggregate.
In the West Riding of Yorkshire the mortality of colliers from phthisis
has increased since 1881 by one-fifth part; but in other counties it
has decreased by proportions in some cases as high as one-third of its
former amount. Non-tubercular diseases of the lungs are excessively
fatal to the colliers of Monmouthshire and South Wales, and still more
so to those of Lancashire, where the mortality from these diseases is
76 per cent. above that of occupied males generally, and is more than
double of what it is among the colliers of Northumberland, Durham,
Derby, and Nottingham. These diseases have very considerably increased
in fatality since 1881 in all the coalfields of England: the increase
being equal to two-thirds of the former amount among the colliers of
Lancashire, and to more than one-half among those of the West Riding
of Yorkshire. Colliers nowhere appear to readily fall victims to
intemperance. In Derby and Nottingham, as well as in Staffordshire,
the colliers are especially free from that vice, their mortality from
alcoholism being only half the low figure for colliers generally. Even
in Monmouthshire and South Wales, where the figure for alcoholism is
the highest, only 7 of the colliers die of this disease for every
13 that die from it in other occupations. Since 1881 the mortality
due to intemperance has slightly increased among the coal miners of
Lancashire, but has decreased in all other counties respecting which
comparison is possible.
_Ironstone mining._--This is one of the industries that are
declining in this country. Miners of ironstone numbered barely 18,000
at the last census, and were fewer by nearly one-third part than at
the census of 1881. More than half of these workers are to be found
in the counties of Cumberland and York, and about an eighth part more
are scattered over the counties of Stafford and Northampton. Speaking
generally, iron-workers are a healthy body of men. They experience
rates of mortality which are lower than those of “occupied males” at
all periods of life between twenty years and sixty-five, and also
lower than the rates for coal miners at the same ages. Both ironstone
miners and colliers, however, suffer a much higher mortality than other
workers at ages under twenty and over fifty-five years; the reason for
this has not as yet been satisfactorily explained. It has been shown
by Dr Ogle and other writers that the vital statistics of ironstone
miners bear a general resemblance to those of coal miners. Recent
investigations confirm this statement thus far, that in both cases
the mortality from tubercular phthisis and from all other diseases
except those of the respiratory system are below the average, and even
this reservation does not apply to the statistics of 1890–2. Their
comparative mortality figure from all causes is 774, and therefore
considerably below that of coal miners in the aggregate. From disease
alone (excluding accident) their mortality is slightly higher than that
of colliers in Northumberland and Durham, but they suffer somewhat less
severely from accident. Ironstone miners are a temperate body of men,
their mortality figure from alcoholism being practically the same as
that of colliers.
The extended tables of causes of death in my larger work show that
ironstone miners suffer more severely than the average from influenza
and from accident, but that under all other headings their mortality is
below that of other occupations.
As compared with miners generally, the only diseases which show an
excess among these workers are influenza, cancer, diseases of the
liver, and suicide. Since 1881, the mortality of ironstone miners
has decreased; but, as in the case of many other occupations, the
improvement is limited to the lower ages, the rate having slightly
increased at ages above forty-five years. Since 1881 the mortality of
ironstone miners from alcoholism has decreased by more than half. There
has also been a substantial decrease in their mortality from pulmonary
consumption, and a slight decrease in that from other diseases of
the lungs and air passages. Diseases of the nervous, circulatory,
digestive, and urinary systems are, however, more fatal than formerly
amongst these workers, and they are now more addicted than they were to
suicide.
_Copper Miners._--The number of men engaged in this industry is
so small that it is scarcely safe to express an opinion as to their
healthiness or otherwise, especially when, as in the present case, the
period covered by the statistics does not exceed three years. At the
last census scarcely more than 1000 copper miners above fifteen years
were enumerated, their number having dwindled to less than a third part
of what it had been at the preceding census.
If one may hazard an opinion from so small a number of deaths, it
would appear that copper miners are an unhealthy body of men: their
comparative mortality figure is 1230, or 295 above that of miners in
the aggregate. Pulmonary consumption and other lung diseases appear to
be very destructive to these workers, and the survivors certainly do
wisely in endeavouring to find a healthier field for their labour by
emigrating to other and more prosperous regions. At the next census
it is probable that the copper-mining industry in England will have
practically ceased to exist.
_Tin Miners._--This is another unhealthy occupation; it is limited
almost exclusively to the counties of Devon and Cornwall. The miners
of tin at the last census numbered rather fewer than 10,000, and as
the deaths in the course of three years did not exceed 336 in all, no
very detailed observations on their mortality would be profitable. In
consequence of the very general emigration of tin miners in recent
years to South Africa and elsewhere, the age constitution of tin miners
as a class has become exceedingly abnormal. Adults in the prime of
life having left their homes in search of more profitable work abroad,
the tin miners who are left at home are the least robust and healthy
of their tribe, and this fact has a considerable effect on their
mortality. Reference to the table on page 156 shows that tin miners
sustain rates of mortality which are excessive at all ages. Their
comparative mortality figure is 1409, or nearly half as high again as
the average. Tin miners die two and three-quarter times as fast from
phthisis, and one and three-quarter times as fast from other lung
diseases as do occupied males generally; their mortality from cancer
and from diseases of the nervous and urinary systems is also in excess
of the average.
MORTALITY OF UNOCCUPIED AND OCCUPIED MEN.
In my previous work on occupational mortality, the death-rates of
unoccupied men were compared, in considerable detail, with those of
men following various occupations, in different parts of the country.
A brief summary of what was then advanced at much greater length may
fitly close the present section.
At the census of 1891 the number of unoccupied males living between
the ages of twenty-five and sixty-five years was returned as 208,857.
Of these, 35 per cent. were classed as “retired from business,” 6 per
cent. as pensioners, and 23 per cent. as “living on their own means,”
whilst 21 per cent. were referred to the class of “unoccupied persons,”
including an unknown proportion of paupers and prisoners. Careful
investigation of the facts leads to the surmise that somewhere between
one-third and one-half of the unoccupied males, as above defined,
experience a mortality which probably does not exceed that of occupied
males at the same ages. If this be so, it follows that the mortality of
the remaining two-thirds, or one-half, as the case may be, must greatly
exceed even the high rates of unoccupied males in the aggregate. In the
following table the rates of unoccupied males are contrasted with those
of occupied males at the several stages of life.
+--------------+----------+------------+-------------------+
| | Occupied | Unoccupied | “Unoccupied” Rates|
| Age-Groups. | Males. | Males. | per cent. of |
| | | | “Occupied” Rates. |
+--------------+----------+------------+-------------------+
| 15–20 | 2.55 | 35.86 | 1406 |
| 20–25 | 5.07 | 29.58 | 583 |
| 25–35 | 7.29 | 27.05 | 371 |
| 35–45 | 12.43 | 35.71 | 287 |
| 45–55 | 20.66 | 37.77 | 183 |
| 55–65 | 36.66 | 59.44 | 162 |
|Over 65 years | 102.32 | 105.86 | 103 |
+--------------+----------+------------+-------------------+
The comparative mortality figures of occupied and of unoccupied males
between twenty-five and sixty-five years of age are 953 and 2215
respectively. In other words, the number of males of definite age
constitution, within these limits, that would give 1000 deaths among
the general population, and 679 deaths in the healthy districts, would
give 953 deaths among occupied, and 2215 among unoccupied, males. The
comparative mortality figure of unoccupied males, therefore, exceeds
that of occupied males by 132 per cent. The following table shows the
chief causes of death that go to make up the comparative mortality
figures for occupied males and unoccupied males respectively.
+------------------------------+--------+----------+-------------------+
| | | |Excess of Mortality|
| Cause of Death. |Occupied|Unoccupied| of Unoccupied over|
| | Males. | Males. | Occupied Males. |
+------------------------------+--------+----------+-------------------+
|All Causes | 953 | 2215 | 1262 |
|Diseases of Nervous System | 82 | 630 | 548 |
|Phthisis | 185 | 448 | 263 |
|Diseases of Heart | 126 | 240 | 114 |
|Influenza and Respiratory | | | |
| Diseases | 254 | 350 | 96 |
|Cancer | 44 | 96 | 52 |
|Diseases of Urinary Organs | 41 | 82 | 41 |
|Alcoholism and Liver Diseases | 40 | 76 | 36 |
|Accidents, including Lead | | | |
| Poisoning | 57 | 81 | 24 |
|Suicide | 14 | 28 | 14 |
+------------------------------+--------+----------+-------------------+
It thus appears that nearly two-thirds of the enormous excess in
the mortality of unoccupied as compared with occupied men is due
either to diseases of the nervous system, or to phthisis. The heavy
mortality from both these diseases would appear to partly depend on
the circumstance that the unoccupied class includes a large proportion
of insane persons who are exceptionally prone to phthisis. Among other
causes of death, diseases of the heart account for 114, and influenza
(with respiratory diseases) accounts for 96 of the excess in the
mortality figure of unoccupied men.
The mortality attributed to cancer is double, and that attributed to
intemperance and liver disease, to diseases of the urinary system, and
to suicide, is about double as heavy among the unoccupied as it is
among the occupied class. The excess of mortality from accident among
unoccupied males possibly results from the addition to their ranks of
men who, having been permanently disabled whilst at work, drift into
the unoccupied class, and finally die from their injuries.
At the census of 1891 London contained 1,230,010 occupied males aged
fifteen years and upwards, while the industrial districts contained
1,833,295, and the agricultural districts contained 1,246,156 at the
same ages. More than half of the occupied males in England and Wales
are therefore included in these three sections of the population.
The mortality of _occupied males_ exhibits very wide variations
in different parts of the country. These variations are exemplified
severally by London, by the group of districts representing Industrial
England, and by the areas representing Agricultural England.
At each of the seven age-groups, between fifteen and sixty-five years,
the highest death-rates occur in the industrial, and the lowest in the
agricultural, districts, London occupying an intermediate position.
The comparative mortality figure among occupied males, at ages from
twenty-five to sixty-five years, is 1147 in London, 1248 in the
industrial districts, and 687 in the agricultural districts; these
figures being respectively 20 per cent. above, 31 per cent. above, and
28 per cent. below, the figure for all occupied males.
Phthisis and respiratory diseases are more fatal than any other causes
of death to occupied males, both in London and in the industrial
districts. In London these two headings contributed almost equally to
the mortality figure. The industrial districts, on the other hand, show
less mortality than does London from phthisis, but the difference is
more than made up by the heavy death-roll from respiratory diseases.
In the agricultural districts the mortality figure for phthisis is
less than half of that of London, and the figure for respiratory
diseases is still lower. After due correction for age constitution,
these two classes of disease in the aggregate cause 48 per cent. of the
total mortality among occupied males in London, 47 per cent. in the
industrial districts, and 36 per cent. in the agricultural districts,
against 43 per cent. for all occupied males within the same age limits.
JOHN TATHAM.
CHAPTER XI
THE DISEASES OF SOLDIERS AT HOME AND ABROAD
The soldier is liable, like other members of the community, to various
diseases due to his occupation and surroundings, although at the
present day the hygienic conditions of barracks and military duties are
so carefully supervised that he is, when on home service, placed under
much more favourable circumstances than men of his own class in civil
life. It is, therefore, somewhat disappointing to find that under these
circumstances, knowing soldiers to be more or less picked men, they are
not, judging from tables of mortality, more healthy than their civilian
brethren of the same age. It is a matter of common observation that the
army ages a man quickly; the old soldier of a regiment, who is looked
upon more or less as a privileged individual, and generally given some
sort of employment which relieves him from “sentry go” and the more
arduous duties of his profession, is seldom over forty years of age,
and ought to be therefore at his best; but partly from the monotony of
his existence, and partly from excessive smoking, drinking, and night
duty, the private of twenty years’ service is, as a rule, a worn-out
machine, his mental faculties blunted, and his body, if not the seat of
actual disease, aged and almost useless. These effects are still more
marked when a man, as is generally the case, has spent a great part of
his service abroad, for to the effects of hot climates and the diseases
incidental thereto must be added, in a greatly enhanced degree, the
enforced ennui and idleness which are the bane of the soldier’s
existence in all stations in times of peace, and especially in the
tropics. We all know how much more likely we are to rust out than wear
out, and the enforced idleness which the soldier, especially in the
infantry, has to encounter, leads to sluggishness of the functions of
the body, while in many, drunkenness, increased smoking and debauchery,
exercise an injurious influence upon health, apart altogether from
the actual diseases to which they may give rise. An old soldier, for
these reasons, can seldom eat his rations, and his system seems to be
in that receptive condition that he readily falls a victim to epidemic
disease prevalent in the neighbourhood, and this the more owing to his
tendency to haunt the lowest and most insanitary parts of the town near
which he may be quartered. This is seen more particularly abroad, where
the native quarters are in marked contrast to the clean and sanitary
military cantonments, so that medical officers have come to regard it
as almost certain that the soldiers will soon suffer when an epidemic
breaks out among the civil population. Statistics prove that the longer
soldiers serve, the greater is the proportional mortality among them.
After these preliminary remarks we will proceed to discuss the peculiar
health conditions under which soldiers exist, and their effects as
regards their duties, habits, surroundings, and dress: firstly, at
home; secondly, abroad, with special reference to hot climates, both
dry and damp, and the diseases from which they suffer in such climates;
thirdly, the special dangers to health incidental to active service.
The peculiar conditions of military as contrasted with civil life are
that the soldier must perforce (in most cases) remain unmarried, that
his daily wants are all provided for by the State, so that his pay,
though small, is practically all pocket money, which may, if he is
so inclined, be all spent on drink and debauchery; that his personal
liberty is a good deal restricted, tending to irritability and low
spirits in many temperaments; that he has no privacy, living as he does
in rooms common to him and many others; that he has to dress in clothes
in which hygienic principles are sometimes overruled by the necessity
for ornamentation and smartness; and that his duties frequently entail
great exposure to varieties of temperature and loss of sleep.
As regards the first of these points, it is known from statistics
that married men, as a rule, live longer than the unmarried, apart
altogether from the dangers of venereal diseases. This is not difficult
to understand, seeing that the married man has more solid comforts,
and is not tempted to spend his evenings abroad, also that he has
that incentive to steady work and moderation in all things which
the celibate has not. Again, the average soldier has undoubtedly
more pocket money than the average civilian of his class; he has no
incentive to save; he is tempted by numerous companions of both
sexes to excess of all kinds, and spends most of his evenings abroad,
consuming more drink and tobacco than is good for him. Vanity and
desire to be smart frequently cause him to dress in garments much too
thin for the state of the weather. Discipline has, no doubt, a very
depressing effect upon the health of some men. Restraint and the petty
tyranny of superiors exercise a bad effect upon their spirits, causing
loss of sleep, and often leading to drinking. In spite of the great
improvement in the treatment of the men which has been effected in our
army in recent years, suicides are still too common, though not nearly
so frequent as formerly, or as they are in other armies.
As regards the herding together of men in barrack rooms, this is an
evil which is almost unavoidable without great increase of expense, but
if it could be altered it would certainly make the army more attractive
to the better class of men. Formerly there was great overcrowding and
consequent sickness, but at the present day, in almost all barracks,
each man has at least 600 cubic feet of space, a larger amount than men
of that class usually enjoy in civil life. Before the need for fresh
air was so fully recognised as it is now, there was great mortality in
the army from chest complaints, especially from consumption, as also
in the navy; but now the regulations are very strict, the number of
men to be accommodated in each room, so as to give each his 600 cubic
feet, is painted on the barrack-room doors, and any overcrowding,
beyond the regulated numbers, must be reported upon and explained by
the officers, regimental and medical. The public are now, generally
speaking, fully alive to the need for fresh air and ventilation, but
disregard of the necessity is still a very fertile cause of disease
in civil life, especially when to lack of fresh air is added the fact
that such air as there is is laden with dust or other solid matter,
as in mines or workshops. In former years the large amount of lung
disease in the army and navy was in exact proportion to the amount of
overcrowding, but now the soldier and the sailor do not suffer more
from these diseases than do the civil population. In the first ten
years of the late Queen’s reign, the deaths from lung diseases in the
army per 1000 of strength were at the rate of 7.82, but in 1898 there
were only 2.5 cases per 1000 admitted to hospital, of whom a very small
proportion died, the majority being invalided or cured. Apropos of this
I need only remark that the latest plan of treating consumptives is to
keep them day and night in the open air. Cold fresh air is no longer so
much dreaded as formerly. That it is not the cause of consumption can
be abundantly proved from army statistics. From these statistics one
may learn how, in the old days of overcrowding, pulmonary consumption
was much more prevalent among the troops serving in the delightful
climate of the West Indies than in England, or in Canada, owing to
the scandalous manner in which the barracks in those islands used to
be kept overfilled. Now, except when yellow fever appears and carries
off the men, the West Indian station is the healthiest quarter of the
British army, not excepting even the home stations.
As regards the dress of the soldier, there was formerly in the
army a good deal of disease of the heart and great blood-vessels.
This was undoubtedly caused by restriction to the circulation from
tight clothing, and from the pressure on the chest of the straps
which supported the knapsack and accoutrements. At the present day
the tendency is to do away with everything tight: the stock has
disappeared, the tunic is made to fit more loosely, and the weight to
be carried is so arranged that there is no pressure on the chest. The
dress for hard work is made of light material, serge or drill, allowing
free transpiration from the skin, and even the stick-up collar of the
tunic is being done away with, at all events for the campaigning dress,
and is being replaced by a turned-down collar, as may be noticed in
pictures of officers on active service in South Africa. One wonders
that any men survived the active service in India in the old days of
the tightly-fitting, thick cloth clothes, insufficient head-dress, and
straps supporting the knapsack and ammunition pouches crossing over the
chest. The fighting at the Alma was in full-dress uniform, and there
is no doubt that there was a great deal of unnecessary suffering and
mortality from this cause. Instinct and common sense alike urge against
doing hard work and long marches in tight clothes, which overstrain
the heart. We still hear every now and then of serious consequences,
both in England and on the Continent, from holding fatiguing field
days in hot weather. Doubtless we must attribute part of the trouble
to excessive smoking and drinking. “Soldier’s irritable heart” is
attributed to the uniform and to men having to stand for long periods
in a constrained attitude; but I am disposed to blame beer and tobacco
for part of the mischief: tobacco especially, I believe to be a cause
of heart trouble among soldiers, though many authorities doubt it,
seeing that Continental soldiers smoke more than ours do and suffer
less. Our men, however, as a rule, smoke and chew much stronger tobacco
than other people; they indulge in it in the early morning on an
empty stomach, and at all other times, and I have known a man who was
anxious to be invalided out of the army produce the most marked cardiac
symptoms by the surreptitious use of strong cake tobacco. The men of
the navy, who have always had a looser and more workmanlike dress than
the army men, do not suffer to the same extent from heart troubles.
Such complaints are more prevalent in that corps of the army which
has the hardest work and the tightest clothes, viz., the Artillery.
With more rational ideas prevailing at the present time, the amount
of heart complaint has diminished, and there is now proportionally
only one-third the amount which existed about the time of the Indian
Mutiny. In making this statement we must, however, bear in mind that
our soldiers are younger than the men of those days, and in such the
effects of these diseases are less likely to manifest themselves.
However, there is no doubt that not only in respect of cardiac, but
of all other maladies, the army is much healthier than it used to be
since reforms in dress and the general treatment of the soldier have
been instituted. Old medical officers say that they never see the same
class of diseases they used to. Walks round military burial-grounds,
especially abroad, tell terrible tales of mortality among troops in
former years. In the “Happy Valley” in Hong Kong may be seen a monument
erected to over 500 men of one regiment who perished there from disease.
Of the duties of the soldier that have a prejudicial effect upon his
health, the most injurious is night guard. The medical authorities are
charged to make representations to the authorities whenever in their
opinion the turn of men for this duty is becoming so frequent as to be
liable to cause illness. To the civilian mind it may seem a trifle that
each man should come on guard not oftener than say once in five days,
but when we consider the long hours of monotonous standing or walking
about in the cold and darkness, perhaps too in rain, which this duty
entails, one can understand how this prematurely ages the soldier, and
can sympathise with the latter’s ambition to get a billet which gives
him all his nights “in bed.” This is altogether apart from the great
risks of inflammation of the lungs or rheumatic fever caught in this
way, especially as the intervals of “sentry go” are, in the winter,
usually spent in a superheated guardroom, from which the soldier passes
to his cold and solitary vigil. I have known among cavalry in cold
weather an immense amount of sickness caused by the men, after getting
very hot while grooming their horses in the hot stables, leading them
out to water in their shirt sleeves. Either from lack of time, desire
to save their clothes, carelessness or reluctance to appear “molly
coddles,” the neglect to put on their jackets frequently resulted in
attacks of pneumonia, quinsy, etc., etc., which the distribution of
woollen jerseys subsequently did much to prevent. Those who imagine
that soldiers lead a lazy life little realise how hard a young cavalry
or horse artillery soldier has to work before he becomes master of his
craft. What with learning to use his weapons, his drill, riding and the
care of his horse, clothes, and accoutrements, the recruit, if not well
fed and cared for, is very prone to break down under hardships.
To turn now to causes of sickness among soldiers abroad. This is so
largely a consideration of the whole question of the effect of hot
climates on the European constitution, that I can only briefly treat of
it here. The first points to note are that, owing to the impossibility
of the troops working in the sun, and to the provision of native
servants to do many of the things which the soldier does himself at
home, the men have much more spare time; the climate causes a great
craving for drink, and the great activity of the skin renders the
system more liable to sudden chills. It is a curious and remarkable
fact that whereas most severe illnesses at home are due to chest
troubles, the abdomen is that part of the body which suffers most
severely in the tropics; hence it has been well said that tropical
disease generally “hits below the belt.”
Let us consider first the conditions of life in a hot, dry climate,
such as Egypt and India in the warm weather, and next, in a moist
climate like Ceylon or the West Coast of Africa. The great difference
between Egypt and India is in that in the former the nights are
comparatively cool owing to the rapid radiation of heat from the sand
as soon as the sun goes down in the cloudless sky, while in Northern
India in hot weather, the nights are almost as hot as the days. Only
those who have had experience can realise the power of the sun in
those climates; to go out into the sunlight without a hat, even for a
few minutes, is to be struck down, or to get a splitting headache for
the remainder of the day; the skin is burned, and the lips cracked by
the hot wind, so that even when driving at midnight one turns away
his face as from the open door of a furnace; while to sleep, except
under a constantly waving punkah, is almost an impossibility for most
Europeans. Bungalows are kept closed up to exclude the hot wind except
at one or two windows, where it is allowed to enter through grass
mats kept constantly saturated with water. The air is only changed by
throwing the house open for an hour or so at dead of night, after which
all openings are again closed so as to bottle up, as it were, a supply
of comparatively cool air before sunrise. Hence exercise in the open
air is an impossibility except before sunrise and after sunset. In the
military stations in India soldiers can be seen sitting all night about
the cantonments, unable to sleep in their beds on account of the heat
of the barrack bungalows, which, like all buildings, retain the heat of
the sun far into the night. When we think of the effect of such a life
on the private soldiers, without a taste for reading or other resources
within themselves, can we wonder that their health suffers, and their
spirits become depressed, or that the raging thirst such heat engenders
should lead to drinking? If the temptation to indulge in alcohol be
yielded to, the liver, already in an irritable condition from the
heat, and from the digestion of a diet of meat much too heating for
the climate, soon becomes congested, or even suppurates; or the nerve
centres which control the temperature of the body, already over-worked,
break down completely, and heat apoplexy supervenes. It is a remarkable
fact that a temperate man rarely suffers from heat apoplexy, for the
body in health can adapt itself to enormously high temperatures. On the
other hand, I have been much struck by the distress caused by the heat
among beer-drinking soldiers, compared with the immunity experienced
by the more temperate officer, doing the same work on a march. The
measures to mitigate the effects of such a climate are to get as much
exercise as possible during the comparatively cool hours of the morning
and evening, and to be as much in the open air as possible at night; to
have a diet as cooling as possible--fruit, vegetables, fish, etc. (all
of which are unfortunately very difficult to procure at that season),
and to try to interest the men with books, lectures, and indoor
occupations, such as woodcarving, bootmaking, etc. Also to let them
have plenty of temperance drinks--tea, lemon juice, etc., etc. Sleeping
in the open air is the pleasantest at these times, but unfortunately
sudden storms are apt to arise in the night which cause annoying
breaks in one’s rest, and again one has to retire indoors at break
of day, just when the air is coolest and sleep most refreshing. The
alternative is to sleep under a punkah indoors, but the punkah-pulling
in soldiers’ barracks is frequently most unsatisfactory, and the broken
rest from the heat and mosquitoes is a serious cause of deterioration
of health in the soldier. To the educated officer with books, and
perhaps music and painting to while away the long, hot hours, the
life in the hot weather is not unpleasant, dinner is not taken till
perhaps 9 P.M., and social intercourse passes the time till
long past midnight, then a few hours of sleep in the coolest time of
the twenty-four hours, supplemented by a siesta in the daytime. All
open-air work is over by 9 A.M. The more closely the life of
the soldier is made to resemble that of his officers, the better will
be his health. A word of warning is necessary about the swimming-bath,
which, though it gives the most delightful form of exercise, is
somewhat dangerous, for the bath being generally under cover, the water
is much colder than the outer air, and lengthened immersion is very
apt to cause liver and other internal congestions, the commencement of
grave tropical disease.
Contrast with the above description that of a moist, hot climate.
The air, instead of being hot and dry, is ladened with moisture, the
slightest exertion causes profuse perspiration, which renders all the
garments damp and clinging; the moisture of the atmosphere renders
evaporation from the body and consequent lowering of the temperature
much slower; there is experienced a total lack of energy, but as there
is no hot wind, the houses can be kept open all day long; there are
frequent showers, and vegetation is abundant, and affords plenty of
shade for those who care to remain out-of-doors all day. There is
not, therefore, in a climate like this the same amount of confinement
indoors, but the constant heat and perspiration are very enervating,
and soon lead to marked pallor in Europeans. The great danger in such a
climate is from the damp clothing; the skin being so active is full of
blood, and a sudden cooling from sitting in a draught in damp clothes
drives the blood to the internal organs, causing congestion of the
liver and spleen, dysentery, etc. To avoid this it is most important
always to wear flannel next the skin and to change after exercise.
By doing this the risks of such a climate are much mitigated. In two
years in Ceylon I never had a day’s illness, and the good health of
the army in the Ashanti expedition of 1895–96 must in a great measure
be attributed to making the men carry a dry shirt on the march, into
which they changed at once on arriving at the halting place. The
most important disease of those climates is malaria, due to a minute
organism in the blood, now proved to be generally communicated by the
bites of mosquitoes. The obvious preventatives are to avoid being
bitten by mosquitoes, to destroy the breeding places of these insects
by draining the pools in which their larvæ develop, to avoid going out
at night, when these insects are most active, and to keep them off by
mosquito curtains. Smearing the exposed parts of the body with carbolic
oil will repel these pests. There is no reason why soldiers in tropical
barracks should not be supplied with mosquito curtains, when it is
not hot enough to demand the use of punkahs, which also keep off the
insects; and I have no doubt this will be done in all feverish stations
as the result of recent teaching.
In sleeping under a punkah, and in fact at all times in the tropics,
where the individual retires to bed bathed in perspiration, one of the
best means of avoiding chill of the abdominal organs is to wear a long
silk scarf (kummerbund) or a flannel “cholera belt” round the body.
One of the older theories about malaria was that it was due to some
miasma arising from the ground, and especially from ground which
had been recently disturbed. However erroneous this idea may be in
theory, in practice many instances are on record of its apparent
truth. I can never forget the results of sending men to a so-called
sanitorium which had been made in the far East by levelling the top of
a mountain and building barracks thereon. Almost every man who went
got an attack of malarial fever, and this is in accordance with the
experience and superstition of the Chinese. They say that the “Fung
Shui,” or genius loci, of a place is a dragon who lives in the ground,
and if you disturb the soil you irritate him, with the result that he
avenges himself by spreading fever among his aggressors. Therefore the
soil about barracks and encampments should be disturbed as little as
possible, and all shallow pools of water should be drained or treated
with a small quantity of paraffin oil to kill the larvæ of mosquitoes.
Other scourges of the tropics which cause sickness and mortality among
our soldiers are liver disease and dysentery (generally due to chill
as above described); and those diseases due to contaminated water,
_e.g._, enteric or typhoid fever, cholera, and some forms of
dysentery. This is so large a subject that I cannot say more on it than
to indicate that the germs of the disease may, while almost invariably
matured in water, be taken into the system with milk, water, or food,
and the best precautions are rigid prevention of adulteration of the
milk (to be secured, if necessary, by having the cows milked before a
responsible European), boiling suspected drinking water, and the most
perfect cleanliness in the preparation of all food. Notwithstanding
the greatest care and expenditure in obtaining the best water for our
large Indian stations, enteric fever seems rather to increase than
diminish, but that is due, I fear, to the carelessness of the soldiers
in drinking from contaminated sources in the bazaars, or in their walks
abroad. The well-water of India and the native made aerated waters are
almost invariably open to suspicion, and ordinary filters are, I fear,
only a delusion and a snare. I am acquainted with at least one terrible
outbreak of cholera distinctly traced to the use of filters. The
bacterial filters of Berkfeld and Pasteur-Chamberland are reliable, but
are so difficult to work and keep in order that it is much better to
trust to boiling the water. In a tropical climate, when soldiers on the
march acquire an intense thirst, it is practically impossible to make
them wait till water can be boiled and cooled before quenching their
thirst, and we have had recently a terrible example of the effects of
foul drinking water in the outbreak of enteric fever among our troops
in South Africa. My own practice in India when out shooting was to
carry boiled water or cold tea, but to slake my thirst as much as
possible by sucking a lemon or lime, a practice which most travellers
and (generally) soldiers also could follow with advantage. Another use
of these fruits is to squeeze a little of the juice into water which
is not above suspicion, as it is known that acids kill the germs of
cholera, and also possibly of enteric fever. I may add that limes are
very abundant and cheap in most tropical climates, and could generally
be served out to the troops.
I have already stated that heat apoplexy is most likely to attack those
addicted to alcoholic excess, and is not likely to be prevalent among
temperate men in the airy dwellings of Europeans in the tropics; but
any great overcrowding, such as occurred in the Black Hole of Calcutta,
would be likely to cause fearful mortality. Great and sustained
exertion in the hot sun of Egypt or India might cause heat apoplexy
or sunstroke in the most temperate. It is marvellous, however, what
an amount of exercise temperate men can take when “pig-sticking,” for
instance, in the hottest weather in India, with impunity.
The Europeans in India, who live in roomy and clean dwellings, suffer
remarkably little from the plague, which is now threatening our
shores, but has so far not obtained a foothold owing to rigid sanitary
precautions.
A very troublesome complaint among soldiers in the tropics is “Dhobie
itch,” a form of ringworm locating itself under the arms and between
the legs, where the skin is always moist from perspiration. In one
regiment I had charge of, about 75 per cent. of the men had it, causing
a considerable amount of suffering and inefficiency. The disease is
spread by inoculation from dirty clothes, or such as have been washed
in impure water, and the best preventative is the use of clean and
frequently changed underwear.
By the adoption of the measures above indicated it is possible for
Europeans to enjoy good health in the tropics, but in war it is
impossible to observe many of these precautions. It is well known
that in all climates the ravages of disease are infinitely more fatal
than the weapons of the enemy. The existence of hostilities, with the
hard work and privations thereby entailed, usually puts all health
considerations into the background. In the Crimean war three times
as many of our men died of sickness as at the hands of the Russians,
and the proportion will be found even greater in the present war in
South Africa, in spite of the deadly accuracy of modern weapons and of
the fact that the theatre of operations is one of the most salubrious
regions in the world. And it is not difficult to understand why this
should be so when we reflect upon what active service means--the
prolonged and intense exertion, the loss of rest, deficiency of food,
which at the best is coarse, unpalatable, and badly cooked--in a word,
starvation; the bad water, the fouling of the camping grounds by the
excreta of thousands of men and animals, the heat by day and the cold
by night, the clothes alternately saturated by perspiration and frozen
by the bitter night wind, also the clothes becoming dirty and infested
by vermin owing to their wearers being unable to change them for weeks.
In the stress of campaigning men have become ill from want of time and
opportunity to secure the daily evacuation of the bowels, which is so
necessary to health. These are a few of the conditions incidental to
active service, and when we reflect it is not difficult to understand
that not only are there many diseases induced by campaigning proper,
but that if a man have one weak point about him, such hardships are
bound to find it out. We have only to glance at the casualty lists
published in the newspapers every morning, to see how various are
the causes of death among our men at the front. So well is this
recognised that every man is medically examined before going on active
service, and all with any defect of constitution are rejected. Here
I may incidentally remark that the prevention of venereal diseases
in the army is a matter of national importance, for the men who are
thereby unfitted to endure the privation of a campaign are many, and
all reasonable measures for the prevention of such diseases should
therefore have the support of patriotic people.
It is well known that excessive fatigue alone will cause a feverish
condition of the body, leading to weakness and loss of appetite,
and when that is induced the body is in a favourable condition for
the reception of the germs of specific diseases. Service conditions
obviously predispose to such diseases as pneumonia, rheumatism, quinsy,
frost-bite, etc., etc., and in hot countries to heat apoplexy and
sunstroke.
The commonest specific diseases of campaigns are dysentery, enteric
fever, cholera, and malarial fevers. Dysentery has always been the
great scourge of armies in the field in almost all climates, and the
causes may be briefly summed up as bad food, bad air, bad water, and
chills. The unwholesome food may cause disease in two ways: owing to
its coarseness and being badly cooked, it may give rise to inflammation
and irritation of the bowels, or it may be deficient in those still
imperfectly understood constituents which are necessary to prevent
scurvy. It is unnecessary to dilate further on the food question, the
points of which are obvious, but as regards scorbutic dysentery I may
say that it is very liable to appear among soldiers in the field, and
our authorities endeavour to ward it off by giving, whenever possible,
rations of fruit, vegetables, jam, and lime juice. As regards bad air,
the condition of camping-grounds whereon large numbers of men and
animals have lived even for a few days must be seen to be realised, and
when to that is added the stench of dead bodies of men, horses, and
cattle, as on a battlefield, it can be easily understood how frequently
the air which men have to breathe on active service must be such as
to give rise to bowel complaints. Again, in some countries where our
troops have to operate, such as in the West African jungles, the air
reeks with the smell of decaying vegetation in the stagnant depths of
the primeval forest, and such air is most unwholesome.
Bad water is the principal cause of dysentery, but whether a man can
acquire true dysentery thus, unless the water has been fouled by the
discharges of a previous case of the disease, is not quite certain.
Generally, such fouling is not difficult to establish. The drinking
of water in which are immersed the rotting carcases of men and
animals, and other nameless abominations--such water as our soldiers
drunk at Paardeberg--is, as might naturally be expected, likely to
cause diarrhœa running into dysentery, especially when all the other
causes of that disease exist also. Chill I hold to be an exceedingly
common cause of dysentery, having contracted the disease myself from
that cause alone after leaving the tropics. It is most important to
avoid sudden cooling of the surface of the abdomen by changing into
dry flannels immediately on halting, and keeping that region warm,
especially at night, by a thick woollen or silk covering. Unfortunately
such precautions are generally impracticable on active service.
Enteric or typhoid fever has only been recognised as a distinct disease
apart from typhus fever since the researches of Sir Wm. Jenner in the
late Queen’s reign, and therefore, whether it used formerly to be as
great a scourge in the past as it is now, it is impossible to say. At
the present day it is without doubt by far the most fatal disease to
which our soldiers are liable either in peace or war, and experience in
Egypt, India, and South Africa, where it seems to become more and more
fatal in spite of all that science can do to check it, almost causes us
to despair.
Protective inoculation on the same principle as vaccination is the
latest plan, tried extensively in South Africa, but the reports to
hand so far do not show that it has had any marked success as a
preventative, though it is hoped that it will prove to mitigate the
severity of the attack. The disease is most prevalent and fatal among
young men, which is a strong argument against the employment of very
young soldiers; but on the other hand many middle-aged men, whose
deaths the country is even now deploring, have lately succumbed. There
is little doubt that in England and other temperate climates this
disease is almost invariably due to bad water, but in India and other
very dry climates, where it has continued to spread in spite of the
most rigid precautions, the opinion is gaining ground that the germs
may often be spread by the wind carrying them about into food and drink
from the dry excreta of previous sufferers, deposited on the ground.
Flies also are suspected of bringing about the same effect. Even in
India and South Africa, however, it is remarkable how often epidemics
are associated with contaminated water--for instance, Paardeberg and
Bloemfontein (where the enemy cut off the regular water supply),
and when one has had experience of the way in which the ground is
fouled by the natives of Africa and India, there is little wonder
that the water supply suffers. It seems certain that people can drink
sewage contaminated water with comparative impunity, but the germs of
enteric once admitted into the water, an epidemic is almost certain.
The Hindoos always wash their buttocks after defecation, and hence
generally perform that act near water, and in the hills in India often
when I have been tempted to drink from an apparently pure mountain
stream, I have noticed, just in time, the evidence of this disgusting
practice. Again natives generally build their huts near a water supply,
and hence nearly every rivulet is contaminated. In a hot country it is
therefore most difficult to prevent men quenching their raging thirst
with obviously polluted water. The Boers are reported to be very filthy
in their habits, and as enteric fever is rife among them, it is not
difficult for us to understand how so many of our men have contracted
the disease in such a thirsty land, where I am informed even doctors,
well aware of the risks, could not resist the temptation of drinking
the dirty water by the roadside. The only safeguard with suspicious
water is to boil it; filters only give a false sense of security, but
wells can be purified with Condy’s fluid and acids, and of course rain
water, if carefully collected and stored, or a stream, if guarded from
its source, may be trusted, as also wells sunk at the time by the Royal
Engineers. Many observers think that enteric fever may be caused by
excessive fatigue and exposure to the sun, with absorption of poisons
from the bowels, especially if they are overloaded with decomposing
excreta due to constipation from heat, hard work, unwholesome food,
and want of time and opportunity to secure a regular evacuation. In
the navy, where condensed water is largely used for drinking purposes,
enteric fever is rare, except when contracted ashore; but as soldiers
cannot, as a rule, be supplied with condensed water, we must rely on
the above precautions as regards water, cleanliness in the preparation
of food, care in the disposal of excreta (and it is important to
remember that enteric urine is as dangerous as stools), and constant
supervision of natives and camp followers.
Cholera is like enteric fever, generally a water-borne disease, and
much the same remarks apply to both. On active service, tea, coffee,
and cocoa should be drunk in preference to water, as far as time and
the supply of fuel will allow, and all drinking water should, if
possible, be boiled. When green cocoanuts can be procured each will
furnish nearly a pint of deliciously cool and perfectly wholesome
“milk.”
I have said enough to show what a vital point the water question is
on active service, how the health of an army in the field is largely
dependent upon obtaining pure drinking water; and while all officers,
regimental and medical, must never weary in their endeavours to secure
such a supply, the men themselves ought to be instructed and exhorted
to exercise the necessary vigilance and self-restraint, and, if
necessary, punished when they fail to do so.
Malaria is always a great danger to soldiers on active service, not
only in tropical regions, but also at times in our own latitudes, as
was seen in the Walcheren Expedition. Though our theories as to the
cause of the disease have lately been altered by the discovery as to
the agency of mosquitoes in disseminating it, the old rules of not
disturbing the ground, sleeping on raised platforms (as was done in the
Ashanti Expedition of 1895–96), avoiding the neighbourhood of marshes
and jungly ravines, preventing chill by changing into dry flannels on
halting, never starting off in the morning without a cup of cocoa or
something of that kind, and taking a daily dose of quinine, should
on account of their proved utility still be followed. To keep off
mosquitoes in the absence of curtains and punkahs, the face and other
exposed parts of the body should be smeared with carbolic oil.
Sunstroke and heat apoplexy are causes of mortality on active service,
and even at home in hot weather we have had lamentable results from
overworking our soldiers in improper clothing and head-dresses. The
obvious precautions are, the avoidance of overcrowding and overloading
the men, the wearing of a suitable head-dress, loose porous clothing,
the provision of plenty of non-alcoholic drinks, and marching in as
open order as possible, so as to give every man enough fresh air. The
greatest precaution of all, viz., avoidance of work in the sun, cannot,
of course, be generally adopted on active service.
Sore and tender feet cause a great deal of inefficiency on active
service, though our army boots are generally very good, with plenty of
room and low heels, but a less rigid sole would be an improvement. The
socks should be woollen and not too thin or loose, the feet should be
kept clean and well soaped immediately before putting on the sock, and
blisters should be carefully treated.
Many of the above suggestions may appear incapable of being carried
out in the stress and hurry of active service, but, of course, anything
which will prevent disease contrives “a double debt to pay”; it keeps
the men in the fighting ranks, and prevents their becoming not only
useless but a burden and trouble to their healthy comrades. Every
soldier is said to cost the country about £150 before he can be placed
in the field as efficient, therefore sickness entails very heavy
pecuniary loss to the country, and all reasonable precautions will
ever receive the earnest attention and support of capable leaders. In
fact, without due regard to many of them it would be impossible in some
countries for white men to remain in the field at all, and the Ashanti
Expeditions of 1873 and 1895 have well been called “doctors’ wars.”
In conclusion, if my remarks have given rise to the impression that
the soldier is a drunken or unreliable creature, such is far from
my intention. He only presents, and that in a degree mitigated by
discipline and respect for authority, the faults of his class. My
experience of the average working man, which is large, is that the
majority cannot refrain from drinking so long as they have money
in their pockets, regardless of the consequences to themselves and
their families, and that to offer a man drink is their ordinary way
of showing kindness and good-fellowship; while their general want of
self-restraint is very disappointing, considering the educational
advantages they have enjoyed compared with their fathers.
J. R. DODD.
CHAPTER XII
HEALTH IN THE MARINE SERVICE
Although from time to time there have been energetic workers in the
cause of marine sanitation, there is probably no other department in
which the great advances in hygiene have produced so little good result.
It must be conceded at the outset that the seamen’s lot is by no means
an enviable one, and that his sanitary environment falls considerably
short of modern requirements. Legislation is slow, and the lack of
knowledge by the public of the requirements of the Mercantile Marine
is no doubt in great measure responsible for this. At a first glance
it might naturally be supposed that a life at sea was a healthy one;
living in fresh air, and removed from the unhealthy conditions of
large towns, it might be expected that the general health of seamen
would bear favourable comparison with the corresponding class of the
community on shore. But there is another side to this picture. In the
first place there is practically always _local_ overcrowding on board
ship, and in dealing with this question the hands of port sanitary
authorities and their officers are tied by the Shipping Acts. By the
Merchant Shipping Act, the minimum space allowed per head is only 72
cubic feet, and in this space a man has not only to sleep, but to feed
and live when not engaged on duty. It has been contended that inasmuch
as one-half of the crew is always at work, the forecastle provides
double this amount of space. But this is entirely a fallacy, for while
half the men are always off duty, there is practically continuous
occupation, and therefore no opportunity of opening doors, skylights,
and other ventilators, to admit of free perflation. Another serious
difficulty to contend with is the presence of moisture. Nearly all
forecastles are badly ventilated, and the greatly increased use of
steel and iron in modern vessels leads to the condensation of moisture,
or “sweating” due to change of temperature. It is no uncommon thing to
find the bunks and bedding in the crew’s quarters saturated with water
from this cause.
While it can scarcely be stated that any special diseases are
associated with the sailor’s calling, there are undoubtedly many which
are caused by the conditions under which he performs his duty. His
work is intermittent, consequently his intervals of rest, broken by
sudden and severe exertion, throw undue and violent strain upon the
circulatory and respiratory organs. In steam vessels the changes of
climate are rapid, and their influence trying to the system. In spite
of all the improved methods of storing and preserving food for long
periods, there is still much to be desired both in the actual dietary
of the sailor, and still more in the rough and inefficient manner in
which it is cooked for him. The loss of life from drowning and other
accidents connected with casualties to the vessel is large. Again,
the habits of the seaman must be taken into account. From the mere
fact of his being for long periods confined on shipboard, without
any amusements except those provided by his fellows, it is perhaps
not surprising that on arrival in port he should give way to full
indulgence in pleasure. Unfortunately, moreover, the parts of sea towns
frequented by sailors are generally the lowest, and the temptations of
the worst kind. This explains the frequency of alcoholism and venereal
disease among our Mercantile Marine, and in addition the tendency to
contract the diseases to be met with in such localities.
The principal diseases to which seamen are liable are:--
1. Those due to the special character of their employment,
such as aneurism, emphysema, hernia, and heart disease, and in
steam-ships, heat apoplexy (stokers).
2. Those due to their habits, viz., venereal disease and
alcoholism.
3. Diseases of climate, liver disease, malaria, yellow fever,
dysentery, cholera, plague, etc.
4. Diseases influenced mainly by immediate environment and
insanitary conditions, such as rheumatism, phthisis, bronchitis,
and various forms of lung disease, under which must also be
included scurvy and beriberi.
There is unfortunately no reliable record of sickness in the Mercantile
Marine.
The returns of the Board of Trade show the mortality rate from all
causes in 1898–99 to have been 9.60 per 1000 in the Merchant Service,
while the corresponding rate in the Royal Navy was, for the year 1899,
4.91 per 1000, or practically one-half.
The returns of the Mercantile Marine show that of the 9.6 per 1000, 7.4
were from injury, and 2.2 from disease; the 4.91 per 1000 of the Royal
Navy being made up of 3.56 from disease, and 1.35 from injury.
The following table shows the disease and accident mortality incidence
in sailing-vessels as compared with steam-vessels.
+-----------------------------+--------+------+------+-----------+
| 1898. |Sailing.|Steam.|Total.|Percentage.|
+-----------------------------+--------+------+------+-----------+
| Wrecks and Casualties | 425 | 607 | 1032 | .58 |
| Accidents other than Wrecks | | | | |
| and Casualties | 129 | 157 | 286 | .16 |
| Disease | 149 | 249 | 398 | .22 |
+-----------------------------+--------+------+------+-----------+
| Total | 703 |1013 | 1716 | .96 |
+-----------------------------+--------+------+------+-----------+
1. _Diseases due to Employment._--The violent exertions called
for at times of emergency fully account for the frequency of heart
disease, especially of cardiac hypertrophy, and also of hernia, while
the occurrence of aneurism may be assigned to the same cause, though
doubtless greatly aided by the influence of syphilis. With the large
increase in size of sailing-vessels and the consequent introduction of
labour-saving appliances, this class of disease is showing a decided
tendency to decrease.
Injuries are more common on sailing-vessels than on steam-ships, owing
to the greater amount of work aloft, and the more laborious efforts
involved in working the sails.
The “heat stroke” of stokers requires special notice. It is far more
common in vessels of the Merchant Service than in those of the Royal
Navy. Stokeholds in the navy are better ventilated, and forced draught,
if necessary, tends to a freer supply of air. The “fireman’s frenzy”
appears to be caused by the continued high temperature, coupled with
insufficient ventilation, and often associated with alcoholism. Much
can be done to diminish heat stroke by due attention to the ventilation
of stokeholds and confined spaces in connection with them. The utmost
advantage should be taken of the up-draught caused by the heat of the
furnaces to remove foul and vitiated air. Men engaged in this class of
work should be freely supplied with oatmeal water, as this is the most
wholesome method of replacing the large quantities of fluid lost by
perspiration. The same class of men are, moreover, specially liable
to diseases of the eye caused by the glare of the furnaces, and the
constant irritation produced by particles of coal and dust.
2. _Diseases caused by the Habits of Seamen._--Of these the two
most common are alcoholism and the various forms of venereal disease.
The irregularity of a sailor’s life, especially in these days of rapid
transport, sufficiently explain without justifying his failings. A man
whose home life is interrupted by voyages across the sea, who is thrown
upon his own resources in foreign ports, and who is from the nature
of his calling almost of necessity confined to the shipping quarters
(invariably the lowest) of the towns he reaches, is not unlikely to
seek for amusement where it is most easily obtained, and wine, women,
and music occupy a considerable part of his spare time under such
circumstances. Much has been done by the Board of Trade and voluntary
associations to protect the sailor, by taking care of his money when
first paid off (when the temptation to squander it is strongest), and
enabling him to draw it at his own home, by arranging for his being
sent by rail to his destination, by protecting him from “crimps” and
unauthorised agents, and by providing Sailors’ Homes, where he can live
at a reasonable cost, without being plundered by unscrupulous persons,
but there is still much to be desired in this direction.
3. _Diseases of Climate._--To a great extent these can scarcely
be avoided. Seamen suffer much from tropical diseases. No doubt their
careless habits and unwillingness to take reasonable precautions in
unhealthy climates are in some measure responsible for this. Simple
rules for the preservation of health, greater care in dieting, and,
above all, limitation of indulgence in alcohol, would be of undoubted
value, and a recent suggestion to afford information on such subjects
to seamen through the medium of Sailors’ Institutes and Homes would
doubtless lead to good results. Diarrhœa, so common a disease in hot
climates, is mainly caused by the ingestion of improper articles of
food and drink. Seamen do not realise the importance of the source
and purity of drinking water. One common cause of this disease is the
carriage of water in casks and tanks on deck, or in places where it is
easily affected by the temperature of the sun. Any simple arrangement
for reducing by evaporation or other method the temperature of the
water supply has considerable effect in this direction. Dysentery, so
far as prevention is concerned, can be guarded against in the same
manner as diarrhœa--water, however, being the main agent in causation.
Cholera, yellow fever, and plague call for no special comment. Where
these diseases are known to exist, shipmasters should be careful to
warn their crews as to the danger, and explain how best to avoid them.
Men should be kept on board as much as possible during the stay of the
vessel in an infected port, and especially should they be required to
return at night. A careful watch should be kept for any suspicious
sickness, and medical advice sought at an early stage of any illness.
The sanitary condition of the vessel itself must be the special care
of the master. Malaria, now known to be due to a specific organism,
conveyed by means of the bite of a species of mosquito, is much under
the control of the master of a vessel, who should prevent his crew from
remaining on shore in a malarial country during the night, or in the
evening, when special danger exists.
4. _Diseases due to Insanitary Conditions and Environment_ form a
long and important series. These are essentially the diseases which can
be controlled, if not altogether prevented.
Rheumatism and its allies are mainly due to cold and exposure, and
still more to the difficulty of obtaining dry clothing on board ship,
and the constantly wet condition of bedding, etc., from the sweating
of iron vessels. These causes can be avoided. The condensation can be
prevented by the universal use of sheathing over iron decks and of
a non-conducting lining over and around bunks, the proper provision
of heating stoves, and the free ventilation of forecastles. There is
further no reason (especially in steam-vessels) for not providing
facilities for dry clothing, and preventing it being taken into the
sleeping bunks. These two precautions, together with the free use of
woollen underclothing, would tend to greatly reduce the “sailors’
curse,” rheumatism. Lung diseases are very common, and are caused
chiefly by the close aggregation of men in confined and ill-ventilated
quarters. The difficulty of the system of watches prevents the proper
airing of a forecastle, and men coming off duty enter an atmosphere
already fouled and polluted by those who have previously occupied
it. The cubic space per head should be largely augmented. The Royal
Commission on Labour has recommended that 120 cubic feet should be the
minimum, and bearing in mind the special difficulties, this would seem
to be a moderate figure. The present 72 cubic feet is ridiculously
inadequate, and only remains the legal minimum by reason of the
proverbial ignorant conservatism of the sailor.
Scurvy happily, under ordinary circumstances, is almost unknown in
its acute form. During the last twenty years our ideas as to its
causation have undergone considerable change, and it is no longer
possible to assert that the one essential for its production is the
use of salt meat, and the absence of vegetable food. In one of the
recent Arctic expeditions, owing to the loss of all the stores, the
crew lived for more than twelve months exclusively on fresh meat, and
no symptoms of scurvy made their appearance. There is little doubt that
the condition of the blood producing the symptoms we call scurvy is
caused by the ingestion of food in an incipient stage of decomposition,
although a free supply of natural vegetable acids will tend to delay
its appearance. Slight manifestations of scurvy are still common
among sailors, and there is one point of great practical importance
in connection with this. More care is required in the examination
of tinned meats, the date of packing should in all cases be stamped
or indelibly marked upon the tin, and those tins that are found on
examination to be in any degree defective, should be destroyed under
official supervision, and not be allowed to pass into the hands of
unscrupulous dealers.
Beriberi is a common disease among certain natives on board ship.
The disease has the habit of remaining dormant in a vessel, also
of recurring from time to time when conditions for its development
are favourable. Though it has been ascribed at different times to
malarial influences, to a deficiency of nitrogenous food, and to a
definite microbe, these explanations have failed to satisfy all the
requirements of the conditions under which it appears. Manson believes
that it is due to a toxine, produced by a saprophyte living outside the
body, and that as the soil or ship becomes infected, man is poisoned
therefrom. It occurs invariably on board ship in connection with moist,
overcrowded, and heated forecastles, where ventilation is deficient,
and may therefore in this sense be said to be a disease caused by
want of sanitation. Further, as favouring this view is the fact that
patients removed to hygienic surroundings, and properly fed, rapidly
recover. To prevent beriberi all that is necessary is to keep a vessel
clean and dry; to see that there is no accumulation of bilge water or
foul matter under the flooring of the crew’s quarters, and that these
are properly ventilated and not overcrowded.[46]
Enteric fever is undoubtedly the most common disease to which seamen
are liable. Thus in the port of London, out of 791 cases of infectious
disease occurring on board ship from 1895 to June 1900, no fewer than
290 were enteric fever. The figures are as follows:--
---------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------
| Cases of | No. of Cases | Percentage
Year. | Enteric Fever. | of Infectious | of
| | Diseases. | Enteric Fever.
---------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------
1895 | 31 | 129 | 24.0
1896 | 53 | 145 | 35.1
1897 | 54 | 179 | 30.1
1898 | 55 | 121 | 45.4
1899 | 66 | 160 | 41.2
1900 (6 months only) | 114 | 187 | 60.31
---------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------
Total | 373 | 921 | 40.49
---------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------
The large proportion during 1900 is due to the number of cases brought
from South Africa.
The causes of the large number of cases of enteric fever are three:--
1. The congregation of seamen in the unhealthy quarters of foreign
ports.
2. Want of care in the selection of sources of water supply.
3. Improper methods of carriage and storage of water.
Most of the infected or dangerous sources of water supply are known,
and great benefit would result if consuls and other representatives of
this country abroad were instructed to warn shipmasters of the special
danger. Water should always be stored on board ship in galvanised
iron water tanks, which should be carried in such places that they
can be easily reached for cleaning purposes. They should be provided
with large manholes so situated that where possible natural light can
penetrate to the bottom of the tanks when the covers are removed. They
should be periodically emptied, cleaned, and coated with a cement wash.
Lastly must be mentioned the digestive troubles so common in seamen.
The insufficient and monotonous dietary is of itself sufficient to
cause this, and when one further considers the unsatisfactory way
in which such food is ofttimes cooked, it will be at once seen how
serious a matter this may become. There is no compulsory diet scale,
nor theoretically is it wise that there should be. It is felt that if
such were laid down by law it would speedily become a minimum beyond
which the owner or master would not care to go. The Merchant Shipping
Act requires that a diet scale shall be produced when men are engaged,
and shall form an essential part of the contract, any departure from
which shall constitute a breach of the agreement on the part of the
employer. Several improvements on the old scale (still usually in
vogue) have been made, but in practice these are scarcely ever adopted.
In the present day there are far better opportunities for giving men
fresh meat and vegetables, while the use of preserved foods should
obviate to a large extent the necessity for salt meat. It can be
clearly shown that a reasonable dietary can be provided at a less cost
than the antiquated one generally in use, while the advantages from the
improved health of the crews and the consequent increased discipline
and work are beyond dispute. But even if the dietary be good, the
cooking is generally bad. Here legislation is needed. At the present
time the master and certain other officers of a ship are required to
hold certificates, granted after training and examination, and it is
equally necessary that in the case of the cook, some definite standard
of knowledge of the work he undertakes should be required before
appointment. In the majority of cases a man is rated as “cook” because
he so describes himself, or has acted in a similar capacity before.
There is no difficulty in organising a system of instruction and
examination for ships’ cooks in large centres, and the result of such
would be to the advantage of shipowners as regards economy of food, as
well as increased efficiency on the part of their crews. This work has
already been initiated in several ports, notably London, Liverpool,
North Shields, and Glasgow, but the question still demands the most
careful attention.
Much ill-health and disease would be avoided if more care were
exercised in the selection of men for the Mercantile Marine. The
Merchant Shipping Act (sect. 10) provides for the medical inspection
of seamen if required, but as a matter of fact, this provision is
practically a dead letter, and men are allowed to “sign on” without any
inquiry as to their physical fitness for their occupation.
W. COLLINGRIDGE.
CHAPTER XIII
RAILWAYS
There is not much to be said respecting the nature of the injuries
sustained by those at work on railways. The occupation cannot be
described as unhealthy. A very large proportion of the work is done in
the open air, and the normal lives of the men appear in every way up to
the average.
The accidents that occur are mainly what would be called surgical.
A large proportion consists of crushed hands and fingers. Instead,
therefore, of entering into details respecting the character of these
injuries and the manner in which they are received, it will be more
useful to give a short account of the progress of legislation in
respect to accidents upon railways.
The Mines and Factories Acts had their origin in the desire to preserve
children from overwork and bodily injury. The protection thus accorded
was gradually extended to women. The next stage was the inclusion of
men in many of the factory provisions, and finally the Acts which had
originally been intended only for the protection of health began to
be timidly and cautiously extended to other and wider objects. But
the movement for the prevention of accidents on railways commenced by
aiming at the safety of passengers, and it was only in the last year
of the nineteenth century that railway servants were included in the
category of protected trades. Limits of space prevent my attempting
to trace the movement in detail, nor indeed is it necessary. I shall
therefore only mention certain epochs which have marked its progress.
As most people are aware, the railway movement began about the year
1830, the year Huskisson was killed, and proceeded until in 1840,
there were nearly 1000 miles of railways in the United Kingdom. But
about this time the importance of railways became so recognised that
in 1840 they were placed under Government supervision. In 1841 a Bill
was brought into Parliament to give the Board of Trade powers to issue
regulations for the prevention of accidents upon railways, and referred
to a Special Committee, presided over by Lord Seymour, and with Sir
Robert Peel, Sir James Graham, and others as members.
The arguments for and against the proposal were exactly the same as
they have always been upon the subject of State interference in matters
of trade. On the one hand, the Board of Trade Inspector-General, Sir
Frederick Smith, contended that the power was necessary. The railway
companies said that by interfering with the responsibility of railway
officials more harm than good would be done. Those who are acquainted
with the general trend of public opinion upon factory questions in
those days will not be surprised to learn that the proposal was
considered likely to “disturb the amicable spirit which then existed
between the Board of Trade and the railway companies,” and “to engender
on the part of the railway companies a desire of concealment and
feelings of jealousy which would not otherwise arise.” The Committee
therefore limited its recommendations to empowering the Board of Trade
to suggest improvements. These recommendations were carried into
effect by an Act known as Lord Seymour’s Act, which provided for the
appointment of inspectors of railways, the reporting of accidents, and
the punishment of engine-drivers, guards, porters, or other servants
of the company who were guilty of negligence. It was urged against the
railway companies that expense was no object where life was concerned;
to which Mr Brunel, the celebrated engineer, retorted on behalf of
the railway companies by asking why the Government did not have a
large force of men on the Serpentine when it was frozen, to prevent
accidents to skaters. He submitted that in considering the question
of safety it might be considered as a question of cost also. On the
other hand, it is interesting to note that George Stephenson considered
it would be advantageous that the Board of Trade should have power
to make regulations. Coming from such a man, himself a large railway
proprietor, the opinion is of great weight.
The next time the question came before Parliament was in 1857, during
Lord Derby’s administration, when the matter was referred to a Select
Committee. The Committee was against interference with railway
companies, except as regards the times of trains, with respect to which
they thought that the public should have some means of obtaining
prompt and cheap redress in the recovery of penalties in every case of
want of punctuality. They also made a few minor recommendations. The
subject was again discussed by a Royal Commission appointed in 1865.
But the times were not ripe for the adoption of State interference.
The _laissez faire_ system was in full force, and the Committee
recommended that the railway companies should not be interfered with.
Meantime the management of the railway companies seems steadily to
have deteriorated. The year 1872 was a year of considerable commercial
activity, marked by a great rise in the price of coal, and by an
increase in the number of railway accidents. In those days it was
estimated that several railway accidents to trains took place every
week, sometimes as many as four were reported on a single morning.
In fact, as stated in the Annual Register for 11th September 1872,
“Railway accidents are now becoming of such frequent occurrence that,
unless a number of people are killed or seriously injured, no notice is
taken of them.” The number of accidents to individuals was also very
great. In that year no less than 1145 persons were reported killed, and
3038 were injured. Some of the accidents, too, were of an appalling
character. At Wigan in August 1873 a portion of a railway carriage,
with a lady in it, was hurled over a wall and through the slated roof
of a foundry. The rest of the carriage was smashed to pieces.
In order to secure more precise returns of accidents by checking
those made by the railway companies, it was provided in the Railways
Regulation Act of 1873 that coroners should make returns to the
Secretary of State of all deaths occurring on railways.
The public feeling which these accidents excited led to the
appointment of another Royal Commission in 1874, during Mr Disraeli’s
administration. It was presided over by the Duke of Buckingham. The
Committee sat for three years and heard evidence at great length. They
ended by recommending that the Board of Trade should have power to
make requirements as to siding and station accommodation, and as to
defects in rolling stock, permanent way, and works. They declined to
recommend that general powers should be given to the Board of Trade to
make general changes calculated to secure the safety of the railway
servants, but they thought that servants ought to receive compensation
for injuries in all cases of negligence of the companies’ officials,
but not for the negligence of their fellow-servants.
In the evidence that was given it seems to have been admitted that
overwork was not universal or even general on railway lines, but a good
many remarkable instances of overwork were adduced. Thus Captain Tyler,
a Board of Trade Inspecting Officer, gave evidence that at Wakefield in
1864, a man had been regularly on duty as a signalman 25 hours a day
every third week, and 37 hours every thirteenth week. The man had made
this arrangement in order to get extra time off duty; and in another
case, in 1874, a signalman had actually averaged 17 hours work a day
regularly.
Nearly all the witnesses complained of the couplings as a fruitful
source of danger. Captain Tyler recommended automatic couplings as then
used in America.
The next Act of importance regarding accidents upon railways was that
passed in 1889, when Sir Michael Hicks-Beach was President of the Board
of Trade. The principal objects of the Act were to secure the adoption
of the block system of running trains, to cause points and signals
to be interlocked, and to enforce the use of an improved brake. The
principal object of the Bill was to promote the safety of passengers;
there was a clause dealing with automatic couplings, but the clause was
ultimately withdrawn from the Act.
During all these years, however, repeated recommendations were made by
the Board of Trade officials to the railway companies to adopt various
means of saving life. The companies were not obdurate or unreasonable;
in particular instances and small points they repeatedly gave way
and adopted suggestions. But in the main they declined to introduce
automatic couplings, or other life-saving appliances on a large scale.
Their refusal was based chiefly on the ground of expense; but they also
defended their action on the ground that the proposed appliances were
not suitable or practicable, and that if adopted they would not produce
beneficial results.
Before narrating the next steps which were made in the direction of
securing safety when Mr Ritchie became President of the Board of Trade,
it will be of use to examine in outline the condition of railway
service as regards accidents, and the means by which the number of
deaths and other injuries is ascertained. Reports of accidents on
railways exist from the year 1848 onwards; but in forms which render
them very difficult to compare with accidents in more recent times. It
was not until the passing of the Regulation of Railways Act of 1871
that the reporting of accidents was placed on its present footing. By
section 6 of that Act it was provided that accidents should be reported
to the Board of Trade, in such form and with such particulars as the
Board of Trade should prescribe. In earlier years the reporting of
accidents was not very systematically done, and in 1872 the inspector
reported that “accidents to servants do not appear in many cases to
have been reported by certain of the railway companies; and their
numbers would, if the whole truth could be ascertained, be very
considerably increased.” Moreover, no uniform standard of injury was
prescribed, so that various companies adopted various standards of
reporting. Some reported all accidents, even trivial ones; others
reported only the serious ones. But in the year 1895 an order of the
Board of Trade was made during the permanent Secretaryship of Sir
Courtenay Boyle, by which the standard of accident to be reported was
assimilated to the standard already in force for the reporting of
accidents in factories and workshops, namely, that all fatal accidents
should be reported, and all non-fatal, whenever they incapacitated a
man from work for five hours on any one of three days next after the
accident. The advantage of this order was that it at once established
a basis of comparison between the dangers of work in factories and in
railways. But there is ground for thinking that the standard was a
little low. A trifling finger cut may prevent a man from working in
some trades for an afternoon. The reporting of every trivial accident
tends also to obscure the graver ones, and in some cases to make
dangerous trades appear less dangerous than they really relatively
are. In any case, however, it is desirable to have one standard of
reporting, and it is a matter for regret that there is no standard of
reporting non-fatal accidents in mines, so that it is still impossible
to compare mines with factories or railways as to the non-fatal
accidents that occur in them.
The numbers of persons employed on railways largely increases from year
to year. Returns of these numbers are now furnished every three years.
We have therefore not at hand the means of working out the percentage
of accidents in every year exactly; but without the danger of grave
inaccuracy we may assume that the increase in the numbers employed is
uniform during each period of three years, and thus we may by a process
of proportion arrive very nearly at the numbers of men employed at any
particular period. On looking at the figures for any year, say for
the year 1898, we find them set out in two tables, one showing those
due to the movement of trains and vehicles, the other to those which
occurred otherwise than by moving trains. They are divided up so as
to show 41 different occupations of the persons killed and injured.
From these tables we find that, in 1898, 522 railway servants were
killed and 12,826 injured, out of a total of 534,000. This would give
1 in 1000 killed, and 24 in 1000 injured each year. When we reflect
that this figure is about the same as the numbers killed and injured
in mines, it might perhaps be argued that the figures are not very
large, for it must be admitted that service on railways must always be
considered rather a dangerous occupation. But an analysis of the risks
to various branches of railway labour dispels this illusion.[47] For
in these figures are reckoned numbers of men whose duties are not of
a manual character, such as 53,000 clerks, who hardly ever meet with
death or accident except from causes common to the whole community.
Besides, about 70,000 mechanics are employed in building engines
and locomotives, and work in factories, which are under the Home
Department, and, strictly speaking, are not railway servants at all.
In railway service there are three occupations which from the number
of accidents reported appear to present special dangers, namely,
plate-laying and repairing of lines, shunting and managing goods
trains. When plate-layers (of whom there are 63,000) sustain an
accident, it is generally by being run over, and in more than one case
out of every three they are killed outright. Out of every thousand
2 yearly meet their death, and 3 are injured. Of goods guards and
brakesmen, nearly 15,000 in number, 3 out of 1000 are yearly killed,
and 48 of 1000 are injured. But the business of a shunter presents the
gravest dangers. The number of shunters is 9244, and with the exception
of the calling of a seaman it is the most perilous trade known. For
no less than 5 men are yearly killed and 66 are injured out of every
1000 employed. And from this it follows that if the average duration
of a man’s service be from the age of twenty to forty, the balance of
probability is against his leaving the trade without a violent death
or injury. This is not satisfactory. It has been pointed out that this
yearly death risk of 5 in 1000 per annum is greater on the average
than that to which soldiers are exposed, taking one year with another,
and war with peace. This is probably true, but the risk is far less
than that of soldiers in a campaign. It has been estimated that the
year’s loss from October 1899 to October 1900, of the troops serving in
South Africa, has been 19 per thousand privates, and 72 per thousand
officers killed, in addition to 30 per cent. of officers and privates
who have died of disease. Thus of the officers engaged about 1 in 10
has died, and of the men 1 in 20.
But any figures of deaths due to accidents in industry are too large if
they are preventable, and it is too much that in ten years a railway
servant should run the same risk as a private in a year of a campaign.
The work of shunting is necessary to rearrange, or, as it is called,
to marshal the trains. At a large goods depôt a number of trains laden
with trucks come in destined for various localities. The trains have
to be dissected, and all the trucks resorted, and made up into fresh
trains to be sent off in various directions. Hence, therefore, it is
necessary for an engine to draw the waggons on to a line of rails, and
then to shunt or direct them on to sidings in different directions in
order to sort them into their right places. This involves the coupling
and uncoupling of the waggons. Passenger waggons have a screw coupling
by means of which they are screwed up together, so that the buffers
press firmly together, and thus jolting is avoided. But goods waggons
have no such luxurious appliances, nor have they in all cases spring
buffers. The coupling is simply a ring hitched into a hook at the end
of a three-link chain, and on the starting or stopping of a goods train
any one may hear the succession of slams with which the waggons clash
together. When it is necessary to shunt, an engine pulls the waggons
along to the place where they are to be detached. While the tension
is on, of course, it would be impossible to unhook, therefore the
engine stops suddenly. For an instant the waggons by their momentum
go forward, bumping up against the engine and one another. For that
instant, and until the rebound takes place, the hooks are free, and a
skilful man, generally with a pole, and but rarely running in between
the waggons, neatly slips the ring off the hook. This is all done
while the waggons are in motion, so that he has to run alongside the
train, skipping over the signal wires and hopping over the cross rails,
keeping his eye always on the coupling, and sometimes encumbered with
a pole in one hand, and at night with a lamp in the other. If he does
not look out he may fall between the wheels, or be run down by the
engine. And while engaged in his work express and other trains come
tearing down the main line, exposing every one to the risk of being run
over. Therefore in all goods sidings it is desirable in the interests
of safety that the through traffic should be as small as possible, that
there should be plenty of room between the lines of rails, that wires
and other obstacles should be boarded over where possible, and that
there should be a good light at night. But many sidings are greatly
crowded; the work has to be got through rapidly, and accidents are
the result. On the other hand, in the private sidings of collieries
operations are leisurely; no express trains come along the line, there
is no night labour, and consequently the accidents are very few. In
America until lately the means of coupling waggons were more imperfect
than those in England; many accidents therefore occurred, and the
trains frequently broke asunder.
In order to expedite work and promote safety, experiments were made
in 1868 with automatic couplings which should close like a snap-lock.
American waggons differ from those in use in England, in that they
are longer and larger, and have a central buffer. In 1874 the public
attention was called to the great number of railway accidents, and in
the more civilised states, such as Massachusetts, a movement arose for
the compulsory employment of automatic couplings. Finally a coupling
was devised, very like a hand with the fingers bent, and a hinge at
the knuckles. When two waggons were brought together the hand caught
automatically into a similar hand on another waggon, and could be
released by withdrawing a pin. At first these couplings were badly
made; gradually, however, they improved, and are now on the fair road
to perfection. They were gradually introduced upon one railway after
another. The rich eastern States took the lead, the wild west was more
slow; but curiously in proportion as the couplings were adopted, so
did railway accidents become less. It would be wrong to conclude that
therefore the whole of the diminution of accidents was due to the
adoption of couplings. But it is a fair inference from the state of
railway management in the east and west of America to conclude that
with careful management and State-imposed regulations, accidents can be
very materially reduced.
This was the state of the problem in 1898, in which year Mr Ritchie,
then President of the Board of Trade, determined to make an effort
in favour of safety. For this purpose he commissioned Mr Hopwood,
the Assistant Secretary of the Railway Department, to visit America
and examine the system of coupling there in use, and its effects
in preventing accidents. In December 1898 Mr Hopwood presented his
memorandum. He says (quoting the _Railway Times_), “Our Railway
Companies’ Association still lacks the moral force, to say nothing
of the initiation which characterises its sister body across the
Atlantic.... This view fairly reflects the opinion I formed that the
progress made in the United States is greatly due to the fact that the
American Association has taken great trouble, and the railroads have
not spared expense in order to give a trial to promising inventors,”
and he concludes by recommending that Parliament should be asked
for powers to be given to the Board of Trade to order the use of a
suitable coupling. In accordance with the recommendations in this very
able report, the President of the Board of Trade introduced a Bill
providing for the compulsory use of steam brakes for engines, and
automatic couplings for carriages and waggons, also brakes on both
sides of waggons, and labels on both sides of waggons, but giving to
the companies two years and five years respectively to introduce these
improvements.
The Bill was introduced by Mr Ritchie on 27th February 1899. He said,
“I am afraid that whatever we do, a number of accidents amongst railway
servants will continue to happen. They are engaged in extremely
dangerous operations, and necessarily many accidents must and will
continue to occur. But, sir, if it is possible by legislation or
otherwise to take means to reduce the number of accidents, I think
it is the bounden duty of Parliament to take those means.” Of course
this announcement caused considerable agitation in the railway world,
and on 16th March a deputation of the private waggon owners of the
United Kingdom pressed upon the President of the Board of Trade the
necessity for further inquiry. Mr Ritchie endeavoured to meet the
current of opposition which his proposals had aroused, by offering
to make it clear that the portion of the Bill dealing with automatic
couplings should not come into operation until a satisfactory coupling
was found, but he ultimately decided to withdraw the Bill and refer
the whole question to a Royal Commission. He determined, however, that
the inquiry should be an effective one, and therefore he enlarged
its scope, and referred to the Commission not merely the question of
coupling, but the whole question of accidents to railway servants
and the means of preventing them. This action had very important
consequences, as will presently be seen. He selected as Chairman
Lord James of Hereford, who had already done excellent work as the
mutually-accepted arbitrator in various disputes between capital and
labour, and whose disinterestedness and fairness could be relied on.
The Commission was composed of members of the House of Lords and
Commons, representatives of the railway companies, private waggon
owners, and railway servants, experts and Government officials. It
was supposed in some quarters that the question had been comfortably
shelved for at least three or four years. But the Chairman took a very
different view of the position. With almost unexampled energy, he
assembled the first meeting on 16th June 1899, a fortnight after the
warrant appointing the Commission had been signed. The last witness was
heard on 3rd August, and the report was presented to Her late Majesty
the Queen on 20th January 1900.
From the very mixed character of the Commission, it might have been
expected that views would differ, and that it would have been difficult
to draw a report that would be signed both by the railway companies’
representatives and by the representatives of the men. But the report
was unanimous, and what was more remarkable still, it went far beyond
the proposals of Mr Ritchie for couplings, and dealt not only with
these, but proposed a means of preventing all accidents whatever. The
principle that lay at the whole root of the report was the assimilation
of means to prevent railway accidents to those already adapted for the
prevention of similar accidents in factories and mines.
In the Coal Mines Regulation Act, 1860, a procedure had been adopted
of special rules in mines. The rules were to be agreed upon by the
Secretary of State and the mine owners. If they could not agree, then
arbitrators were to be named who were finally to settle them. This
procedure was adopted in all successive Acts relating to coal mines.
Being found useful, it was adopted into the Factory Acts in 1891 in
all cases of specially dangerous trades, among others the cases of
industries where lead poisoning, phosphorus poisoning, and other
dangers are experienced. But by the Factories Act, 1901, an order of
the Secretary of State, after hearing the parties, is now substituted
for arbitration.
When the Royal Commission sat, the first question that arose was
whether the accidents to railway servants were so numerous as to
constitute it a dangerous trade. Figures soon settled this point, and
appear from the following table:--
-----------------------------------------+---------------+----------------
|Killed from all|Injured from all
Description of Labour. | Causes per | Causes per
|1000 employed. | 1000 employed.
-----------------------------------------+---------------+----------------
Railway Servants in general, excluding | |
Contractors’ Men, Clerks, and Mechanics| 1.24 | 31.0
Goods Guards and Brakesmen | 2.92 | 61.0
Permanent-way Men or Platelayers | 1.9 | 16.0
Shunters | 5.08 | 78.0
Men Porters (railways) | 1.15 | 63.0
Seamen (merchant service) | 5.2 | Not known.
Coal Miners (underground) | 1.37 | No figures
| | available
| | for purpose
| | of comparison.
Coal Miners (surface) | 0.92 | Ditto
Metalliferous Mines (underground) | 1.34 | Ditto
Metalliferous Mines (surface) | 0.43 | Ditto
Factories--Textile (males) | 0.1 | 6.2
„ Textile (females) | ... | 2.7
„ Non-textile (males) | 0.2 | 13.8
„ Non-textile (females) | ... | 2.0
„ Extraction of Metals (males) | 1.1 | 16.4
„ Shipbuilding (males) | 0.5 | 39.3
„ Dock Labourers | 1.4 | 57.0
-----------------------------------------+---------------+----------------
From this it will be seen that while on the average work on railways is
almost as dangerous as mining, yet where particular branches of it are
considered, such as shunting, it is far more dangerous, and those who
advocated a policy of non-interference found it impossible to explain
their position consistently with the admission of the expediency of
the existing factory and mine laws. It is impossible to put the matter
more clearly than in the following short interrogation of one of the
principal witnesses on behalf of the railway companies by the Chairman.
Q. 6374. Do you approve of a dangerous trade being inspected?--Yes.
All dangerous trades?--Yes. For instance, merchant-shipping?--Yes.
Mines?--Yes. Factories?--Yes. Textile and non-textile?--Yes. Machine
shops on your railway?--Yes. The witness, however, contended that
the case of railways was different from that of mines and factories,
because railways were more amenable to public opinion.
Another witness who held these views was compelled to admit that the
force of public opinion had not on all lines secured punctuality of
trains. On the other hand, an argument was brought forward by Mr Gibb,
the General Manager of the North Eastern Railway Company, which
deserves attention, because it exhibits a phenomenon that is frequently
observed in industries. By a table he showed that the accidents on
railways since 1872 had been decreasing in a ratio almost as fast as
the decrease in mining and factory accidents. At first sight this would
appear to show that accidents decrease as fast without legislation as
with it. But it must be remembered that the Mines and Factories Acts
had been some years in operation, and had already before this date
effected their principal results, and that the accidents were far
fewer than in the dangerous branches of railway service. Moreover, the
reports of previous Royal Commissions on Railways had been followed by
legislation, and by increased vigilance on the part of the companies.
It was proved also that this decrease had not taken place in the
dangerous branches, and that the number of deaths of men engaged in
shunting had actually increased.
The position taken up by the railway companies deserves attention.
Their representatives were confronted with a vista of increased
wages, increased cost of coal, and a fall in profits. It was asking
much to expect them to apply the knife to their own throats and vote
that restrictions should be imposed upon them. As a rule, although we
all believe in the necessity of compelling others to do right, few
people can be brought to believe that it is needful that the same
principle should be applied to themselves. And yet, to the everlasting
credit of the railway companies, it must be said that as soon as they
were convinced that a case for intervention had been made out, they
acquiesced in it. And the waggon owners, although the accidents on
private lines were exceedingly few, withdrew their objections. In the
result a report was unanimously signed, recommending that in the case
of all dangerous trades of railway service the Board of Trade should
have power to propose regulations which in case of dispute were to be
settled by the Railway Commissioners.
The question of the possibility of automatic couplings was discussed
before the Commission. If it had been fully gone into, the question
would have taken years to consider, and, without experiments, no
conclusions could ever have been arrived at. But with great tact
Lord James determined that unimportant issues should be eliminated.
He referred the question to a strong subcommittee, and before the
Commission had gone far it was seen that it was quite possible to deal
practically with railway accidents, without first determining whether
or no there was a practical automatic coupling. No definite opinion on
this question was expressed by the Commission.
To give effect to these recommendations Mr Ritchie introduced a Bill
into the House of Commons. It was taken charge of by Lord James of
Hereford in the House of Lords, and with some amendments it passed
both Houses without opposition. The effect of this Bill is to bring
dangerous processes on railways under regulations similar to those
which can be made in the case of dangerous processes in factories and
mines. No particular operations are specified; there are powers to meet
all dangers as they arise. It is too much to say that this Bill will
not need amendment, but it must be a source of satisfaction to the late
President of the Board of Trade and his officials to have inaugurated,
and successfully carried through with the unanimous consent of all
interested parties, a scheme of legislation which brings railway labour
within the circle of protected industries, and which establishes
a fundamental principle so wide as probably to dispense with the
necessity for further legislation upon the subject for many years.
HENRY CUNYNGHAME.
CHAPTER XIV
SAFE-GUARDING OF MACHINERY
Amidst the variety of dangers which attend those who are employed in
factories none occupies so prominent a position as that arising from
machinery moved by mechanical power; others, such, for instance, as
periodical outbreaks of industrial poisoning or the occurrence of
disastrous explosions, may from time to time attract public attention
more vividly, but we have only to refer to the statistics issued
annually by the Home Office to perceive how ever present and ever
recurrent are the risks incurred by factory workers from machinery.
From these statistics it appears that during the year 1899 there
occurred in factories 301 fatal and 19,321 non-fatal accidents, all
attributable to machinery moved by mechanical power. Beyond, however,
stating that the numbers are the highest yet recorded in any one year,
no useful purpose would be served by comparison with former years, or
by inquiry as to the reasons of the increase in spite of legislative
and executive requirements for safe-guarding. The Factory and Workshop
Act of 1895 introduced such an entirely new element by the inclusion
of every dock, wharf, warehouse, laundry, etc., in the definition of
the term “factory,” that any comparison would be entirely misleading,
whilst the facilities afforded in recent years by the introduction of,
and improvements in, gas engines have added largely to the number of
small factories using mechanical power, and therefore to the number
of persons brought into direct contact with machinery. The statistics
quoted are, however, in themselves sufficient to establish the
importance of the subject of safeguards and the prevention of accidents.
In searching for the causes of such a large number of annually
occurring accidents they are found to be various, but after
enumerating several, such as carelessness on the part of operatives,
unsuitable clothing, insufficient lighting, etc., there remains a very
considerable proportion directly attributable to the absence of proper
safeguards. It is with this cause that this paper proposes chiefly to
deal.
With a view to prevention of such a distressing number of accidents,
Parliament has, from time to time, passed enactments requiring certain
steps to be taken for safe-guarding machinery, and the appointment
of Inspectors has been made for the purpose of seeing that these
provisions are duly carried out. Much, however, still remains to be
done, not only through further legislation, but also by enforcing the
requirements of the law as it at present stands. The latter course at
first sight might appear to be feasible enough, but in reality it is
a Herculean task, as difficult to accomplish as the destruction of
the many-headed hydra of ancient fable, and is due to the fact that
as fast as the requirements of the law are insisted upon and carried
out in the case of machinery already existing in factories, so fast
do makers of machinery send out new machines in a similarly defective
condition. If the desired finality is to be arrived at, it must be by
pressure brought to bear upon machine makers. At present machinery does
not come within the provisions of the law as to safety till it is in
actual use, when the attention of the user is perhaps first drawn to
its defects by the occurrence of an accident. Much, no doubt, could be
done were purchasers in all cases to insist on due regard being paid
to this point by makers, but experience shows that this is done in
very few instances. Whilst some parts of prime movers and mill-gearing
must necessarily be fenced after being placed in position, there is
no reason whatever why the effectual guarding of cog-wheels, the
countersinking of set-screws, the provision of loose pulleys and strap
forks, and the substitution of plate wheels for exposed arm wheels,
which are all intrinsic parts of machines, absolutely necessary for
ordinary safety, should not be dealt with in the first instance by
makers who can provide more effective and neater guards at a much less
cost than the user.
The subject of safe-guarding machinery is such a wide one that it will
be impossible, within the limits of this paper, to do more than briefly
touch upon the more salient points which naturally present themselves
to one accustomed to inquire into the causes of machinery accidents.
For this purpose it will be most convenient to deal with machinery
under the four following headings:--
1. Prime movers.
2. Mill-gearing and belts.
3. Machines for manufacturing purposes.
4. Hoists and other lifting tackle.
Each of these divisions is separately dealt with by the provisions of
the Factory Acts, but it should be pointed out that whereas belts have
herein been coupled with mill-gearing, yet by Section 37 of the Factory
Act of 1891, all “driving straps and bands” are expressly included
in the term “machinery” and are therefore subject to the provisions
laid down for the third division.[48] They are, however, so intimately
connected with mill-gearing as more properly to belong to that class,
and they will therefore be more conveniently dealt with in connection
with mill-gearing, between which and the machine tools themselves they
are the connecting link.
_Prime Movers._--Prime movers are of various kinds, consisting
of heat engines, such as steam, gas, and oil engines, electric and
hydraulic motors, water-wheels, turbines, and wind-mills. Of these,
those most commonly found in factories are steam and gas engines. The
provisions of the Factory Acts as to safe-guarding prime movers are
absolute. No matter what its position, every part of an engine moved by
mechanical power is required to be securely fenced, and such fencing
must be constantly maintained. Thus:--
Factory Act, 1901, Sec. 10.--“Every fly-wheel directly connected
with the steam, water, or other mechanical power, whether in the
engine-house or not, and every part of any water-wheel or engine
worked by any such power, shall be securely fenced.”
“Every wheel-race, not otherwise secured, shall be securely
fenced close to the edge of the wheel-race.”
Such absolute provisions, if strictly carried out, should be amply
sufficient to prevent almost all accidents arising from prime movers;
but the danger lies in the fencing being in the first instance
insufficient, or not properly and constantly maintained, in accordance
with Sec. 10 (_d_) of the Factory Act of 1901. Accidents caused by
prime movers are, of course, restricted in number, partly owing to the
fact that they are usually in the sole charge of one man, and partly
because, in the case of steam engines at least, they are generally
placed in a house or compartment set apart for them, but it will be
noted that the words “whether in the engine-house or not” are expressly
used for the protection of the engine attendant himself.
Occupiers of factories, owing to their absolute obligation to fence
securely every part of a prime mover, and to their liabilities for
any neglect to do so, should be specially careful to see that the law
is fully carried out before an engine is put into use; whilst no
exception should be tolerated for a moment by those whose duty it is to
enforce the requirements of the law.
The necessity of fencing being thus absolutely enjoined for every
portion of a prime mover, the only point that remains is as to what
constitutes secure fencing. Types of engines, however, are of so
various a character, and the local surroundings so distinct, that it
must suffice for the purposes of this paper to point out what parts of
an engine are most liable to cause accidents, and, generally, the most
approved steps which should be taken for their prevention.
_Steam Engines._--As regards steam engines, all parts on the floor
or platform level, such as fly-wheels and fly-wheel pits, crank and
crank-pits, crank shafts, connecting rods, cross-heads, etc., should be
securely fenced by means of rail fencing, whilst in the case of large
vertical or beam engines, all stairs, platforms, and stagings should
be efficiently guarded in similar manner. The fencing adopted should
consist of double rails, the upper one being not less than 3 feet in
height, whilst in many instances a skirting board 5 to 6 inches in
depth should be added; single rails are either so high that persons may
slip under them, or so low that they may fall over them. Care should
also be taken that no railing be placed within a foot of the moving
parts, the placing of such rails too close thereto being a source of
great danger; whilst, on the other hand, the practice of leaving so
much space between any moving part and the guard as to allow of a
passage between them is equally to be condemned; moreover, the keeping
of oil-cans, tools, etc., or the hanging up of clothes within the space
fenced in accordance with statutory obligations should be absolutely
forbidden. Other parts of steam engines requiring fencing which may
be mentioned are piston rods prolonged through the end covers of
cylinders, governor balls encroaching on a passage, and pinion wheels
operating the governors.
_Gas and Oil Engines._--The use of prime movers of the gas engine
type has enormously increased of late years, adding greatly to the
number of small factories as distinct from workshops. The safe-guarding
of these, though they are relatively much smaller than the generality
of steam engines, is none the less essential, for whereas the latter
are usually placed in an engine-house specially built and separated
from the factory itself, the former are in numerous instances placed
within the factory, in some cases with a wooden compartment erected
round them, and in others with nothing but the statutory fencing
separating them from the rest of the works. Where these compartments
are large enough, similar railing to that described above for steam
engines will be found sufficient, but in many instances they are so
confined as to necessitate more complete fencing in order to comply
with the requirements of the Acts as to fencing securely any fly-wheel,
whether in the engine-house or not.
[Illustration: FIG. 1.--Strong’s “Standard Guard”
for engine fly-wheels.]
Wherever possible gas engines should be placed in a room set apart for
them, so as to be isolated from the approach of unauthorised persons;
those situated in the machine room of a factory are not only a source
of danger to those employed therein, but so contaminate the atmosphere
as to necessitate the provision of a fan to remove the fumes. In many
cases, owing to the confined space of the engine compartment, or to
the fact that the fly-wheel is in an exposed position facing into the
machine room, a complete wire-work guard should be provided; these can
be made either to slide, swing, or to be lifted so as to suit local
surroundings; an illustration of such guards is shown in Fig. 1. Shaft
ends projecting into passages should be fitted with metal caps so as
to avoid the danger of clothing being caught. The common practice of
starting a gas engine by hand, by pulling round the fly-wheel, is also
attended with risk, but this can be avoided by the use of a starting
handle, Fig. 2.
[Illustration: FIG. 2.--Safety starting-gear for gas
and oil engines. The gear can be attached to either end of
the shaft.]
_Other Prime Movers._--Very similar rail-fencing to that described
above for steam and gas engines may be applied in the case of other
prime movers where electricity or water provide the moving power. As
regards water-wheels, it should be noted that, although situated in a
wheel-house, the same obligation to guard securely prevails as in the
case of a steam engine, and in every instance the wheel-race must be
fenced close to its edge.
As for turbines and wind-mills, the most dangerous parts requiring to
be fenced will be found to be toothed gearing and shafting.
_Electrical Generators._--The special risks attendant on
electrical generators from shocks scarcely perhaps come within the
scope of this paper. Ordinary rail-fencing may be relied upon for
protection of moving parts, though the railings should be made of some
non-conducting material such as wood.
_Mill-Gearing._--Mill-gearing is defined by Section 156 of the
Factory and Workshop Act, 1901, as comprehending--
Factory Act, 1901, Sec. 156.--“Every shaft, whether upright,
oblique, or horizontal, and every wheel, drum, or pulley, by
which the motion of the first moving power is communicated to
any machine appertaining to a manufacturing process.”
The provisions of the Factory Acts bearing on mill-gearing enact that:--
Factory Act, 1901, Sec. 10 (_c_).--“Every part of the
mill-gearing shall either be securely fenced, or be in such a
position, or of such construction, as to be equally safe to
every person employed or working in the factory, as it would be
if it were securely fenced.”
Factory Act, 1901, Sec. 13 (3).--“The cleaning of mill-gearing
whilst in motion is, moreover, prohibited for women, young
persons, and children.”
Accidents caused by mill-gearing and belts are not only amongst the
most numerous, but certainly amongst the most serious of all those to
which persons employed in factories are subject, and yet nearly all
such may be avoided by strict observance of the precautions proposed to
be set forth herein.
[Illustration: FIG. 3.--Coupling with dangerous
projecting bolt-heads.]
[Illustration: FIG. 4.--Safety Coupling with
countersunk bolt-heads.]
[Illustration: FIG. 5.--Collar with dangerous
projecting set-screw.]
[Illustration: FIG. 6.--Collar with countersunk
set-screw.]
_Mill-Gearing._--First, as to construction and position, whilst
the distance between the bearings which support a shaft must vary
with the weight of the shaft and pulleys, and tension of the belts,
it should never exceed 13 feet, and in order to comply with the
requirement of the law quoted above, both shafting and pulleys should,
wherever possible, be not less than 7 feet above the floor, otherwise
the obligation to fence prevails. Shafting of considerable length is
composed of separate parts connected by couplings. These couplings
should always be near a pedestal and not in the middle of a span,
and should invariably present a perfectly smooth surface, free from
bolts or screws, which are liable to catch the clothes of workmen--the
old-fashioned couplings with projecting heads of bolts and screws
(Fig. 3) are the worst possible form; there are many kinds without any
projections whatever (Fig. 4). Ends of keys fixing the pulleys or bevel
wheels on to the shafting should either be cut off or protected by a
key cover. All set-screws fastening collars to the shafting should be
countersunk (Figs. 5 and 6). In fact it should be an absolute rule
that projections of every kind should be removed from shafting. The
dangers of shafting, however, do not cease with projections: it is an
established fact that perfectly smooth shafting is highly dangerous;
should the shaft be greasy or his clothing damp, a workman may be
caught by a perfectly smooth shaft. That being so, no one should
ever be allowed to come into direct contact with shafting in motion:
cleaning or lubricating should only be done when it is at a standstill.
_Access to Shafting._--Where shafting is of the requisite height
named above, no further protection is required round the shafting
itself, but seeing that it is necessary at times to reach it, proper
and secure means of access should be provided. This can be done either
by a service platform, when the shafting is very high, or by ladders
adapted for the purpose. A service platform, whilst providing easy
access to shafting, should keep the attendant at a safe distance from
it, and at the same time guard against his falling. With a view to this
it should be provided with a hand-rail not less than 3 feet in height,
and a skirting board of 5 to 6 inches in depth to stop the foot in case
of slipping. Ladders should invariably be supplied with hooks at the
upper ends and spikes at the lower, the latter where the nature of the
flooring permits. In no case, however, should an attendant be allowed
to fix a ladder against a wall so as to place himself between the
shafting and the wall.
_Fencing of Low Shafting, etc._--Where, however, shafting and
pulleys are not of the desired height above the floor, the obligation
to fence both arises. When shafting is near the floor it should be
completely covered by a sheet-iron or wooden casing, and the pulleys
fenced so as to afford a safe passage for workmen by either stepping
over the casing or crossing it by means of steps according to the
height from the floor. Shafting from 3 to 6 feet above the floor
should be protected by a secure rail preventing access to it except
by passages so arranged and boarded as to prevent any contact with
the shafting. Vertical shafts should in every case be surrounded by a
sheet-iron or wooden sheath firmly fixed.
_Pulleys._--Whenever driving pulleys are so situated that a
workman has reason to pass near them, they should be securely fenced
by means of boards or metallic netting, and it is desirable to fill up
the pulleys with a disc of wood or sheet-iron fastened to the arms by
means of screws. Loose pulleys should not be placed on the shafting
itself; lest they grip the shaft and carry the belts round with them,
but should be mounted independently.
_Driving Belts._--Driving belts are a constant source of
accidents. When a belt has been thrown off its pulley it should never
be allowed to rest upon the shaft; when in that position it is liable
to be wound rapidly round the shaft, carrying with it anything with
which it comes into contact. This danger is easily avoided by means
of a belt rest or hook fixed according to available surroundings.
Another fruitful source of accidents through belting is the method in
which they are joined; one should always be selected which presents
no projections capable of catching clothing or dealing severe blows.
Accidents have frequently occurred in both ways; hence the necessity of
avoiding all projections on belting.
_Shipping of Belts._--Accidents constantly occur during the
shipping of belts. Workmen should be absolutely forbidden to put a
belt on to a pulley by hand whilst the shaft is in motion at its full
speed. It should be stopped altogether, or at least be greatly reduced
in speed, in which latter case a man should be ready to complete the
stoppage at once in case of danger occurring.
_Belt Poles._--Where it is desired to avoid stoppage of the engine
or shafting, belts should in all cases where possible be put on to
the pulleys by means of a belt pole. It should be carefully borne in
mind, however, that a short belt pole is in itself a source of danger,
owing to its liability to deal a severe blow in case of the pin of the
pole becoming in any way entangled; fatal accidents have occurred in
this way, and therefore it is most important that the length of the
pole should be nearly equal to the distance of the shafting from the
floor, thus forcing the workman to hold it at his side instead of in
front of him. In cases where, for some reason or other, a belt pole
cannot be used, the necessity of stopping the shafting in order to put
on the belt by hand may be avoided by means of an appliance termed a
belt shipper, of which there are a number of types, and which enable
a workman to ship a belt with the shafting in motion whilst he is
standing on the floor.
_Protection of Belts._--Owing to the danger arising from clothing
being caught by belts, it is desirable in many cases to protect them;
thus belts passing through floors should in all cases be surrounded
with a casing of wood; oblique or horizontal belts should be protected
by a railing preventing access to them, or by a trough below the belt
securely fixed; the same remarks will apply to driving ropes, whilst
the splicings of the latter should be frequently examined, owing to
their liability to break and cause serious accidents in falling.
_Bevel Wheels._--Bevel wheels on shafting should be encased with
sheet-iron cover, with one of its faces opening for purposes of oiling.
_Means of Stopping Machinery._--Many of the most serious accidents
through mill-gearing and belts might be avoided if means existed for
stopping the machinery quickly. When it is necessary to go to the
engine-house to warn the engine driver to stop the engine, the mischief
is done before this can be effected; some means, therefore, should be
at hand to stop the machinery at once. In choice of the method by which
disconnection is to be accomplished, preference should be given to one
which brings it into play from many parts of the factory by mechanical
or electrical means, whilst in some cases a brake acting upon a special
pulley is provided and brought into play at the same time by the same
means. The stoppage of the engine or the disconnection of the main
shaft is attended by the disadvantage of stopping the whole of the
machinery in the factory, and it is better, therefore, to disconnect
each driving shaft individually, thus stopping the machinery in one
room only. The disconnecting arrangements which are open to selection
are numerous, but mainly consist of two classes, viz., toothed and
friction clutches; of these preference may be given to friction
clutches for various reasons.
Lastly, with regard to mill-gearing, its care should be entrusted to
special and experienced men, and no one else should be allowed to
interfere with it. Attendants should, as far as possible, only approach
it when it is at a standstill, and their clothing should invariably
consist of tight-fitting jackets or jerseys, with nothing whatever
loose about them.
_Machine Tools._--Having thus disposed of the two first main
branches of our subject, viz., prime movers which supply the motive
power, and mill-gearing and belts which transmit it, it remains for us
to deal with the vast number of machines to which the motive power is
communicated and by which the manufacturing processes are carried out.
These are so numerous that it would be useless to attempt to deal with
them individually in this paper. It will, however, be possible to set
forth certain rules which should invariably be observed in order to
minimise the risks which at present unnecessarily present themselves to
those whose duty it is to attend to machine tools. Whilst the danger
of accidents from prime movers and mill-gearing is greatly restricted
owing to the fact that they are, or ought invariably to be, in the
sole charge of a limited number of experienced persons, the machines
themselves are attended to by large numbers of men, women, young
persons, and even children. There is, therefore, the greater necessity
for taking every precaution possible to prevent the occurrence of
accident thereby.
The provisions of the Factory Acts with regard to machine tools are as
follows:--
Factory Act, 1901, Sec. 10 (_c_).--“All dangerous parts of
the machinery shall either be securely fenced, or be in such a
position, or of such construction as to be equally safe to every
person employed or working in the factory, as it would be if it
were securely fenced.”
Factory Act, 1901, Sec. 10 (_d_).--“All fencing shall be
constantly maintained in an efficient state whilst the parts
required to be fenced are in motion or use.”
By these provisions it will be observed that machine tools are placed
on the same footing as mill-gearing, but with the additional precaution
that--
Factory Act, 1901, Sec. 13.--“A child shall not be allowed to
clean any part of the machinery in a factory while the same is
in motion by the aid of steam, water, or other mechanical power.”
In connection with this latter provision it is important to notice
that in the case of Pearson _v._ Belgian Mills Co., (1896), 1 Q.
B. 244, it was held that the words “the same” in the section, refer to
the machinery as a whole, whether fixed or in motion, and not merely
to such parts of it as are in motion; the employment, therefore, of a
child to clean the fixed part of machinery in motion constitutes an
infringement of the Act.
Further enactments for safety in connection with machines are that--
Factory Act, 1901, Sec. 12 (3).--“A child, young person, or
woman shall not be allowed to work between the fixed and
traversing part of any self-acting machine while the machine is
in motion by the action of steam, water, or other mechanical
power.”
Factory Act, 1901, Sec. 12 (1).--“In a factory erected after the
commencement of 1896, the traversing carriage of any self-acting
machine shall not be allowed to run out within a distance of
eighteen inches from any fixed structure, not being part of the
machine, if the space over which it so runs out is a space over
which any person is liable to pass, whether in the course of his
employment or otherwise.”