CHAPTER XVI.

The Good Parliament.

Whatever men might have hoped from the Congress at Bruges, and from the

lay ministry formed by the influence of John of Gaunt and his party, all

their hopes were now disappointed. They had hoped for reform in the

Church, and all they obtained was a compact with the Papacy for the

maintenance of old abuses. The man who had been foremost in making this

compact, the Bishop of Bangor, was rewarded by translation by Papal

provision to the see of Hereford. This was what the lay ministry had

done for the Church after all its promises of reform. And what had

become of the money which they had voted for the continuance of the war?

How had the war been conducted? A few short years before France had lain

crushed and humbled at the feet of England; now nothing remained of all

that the Black Prince had won in France, except Bayonne, Bordeaux,

Calais, and a few other unimportant places. The English navy had been

annihilated; the English coasts had been insulted by the enemy; never

had England known such degradation. Men had believed in the Duke of

Lancaster, and this was what he had led them to. Now men saw his

personal aims, his selfish ambition. All the tide of popular fury was

turned against him and his ministers. He was accused, whether justly or

not we cannot say, of designs on the throne; since he knew that his

brother, the Black Prince, could not live long. When he was dead nothing

would stand between Lancaster and the throne but the young Prince

Richard. There was no man more unpopular than he in England; for he was

regarded as the opponent of the people's hero, the Prince of Wales.

But the people alone could do nothing against the power and influence of

the Duke. In their hour of need, however, they found a leader in the man

who had so often led their armies victoriously against the enemy, in the

Black Prince himself.

Parliament met at Westminster in the spring of 1376. It was three years

since it had last met--an unusually long interval, considering the

frequent Parliaments held in this reign. The Black Prince had moved to

the royal palace at Westminster, that he might be able to watch over the

proceedings. The King opened Parliament on the 28th of April; and on the

following day the Lord Chancellor Knyvet addressed the Lords and the

Commons assembled in the great chamber at Westminster. He told them

briefly the reasons for which they had been summoned. "First, to advise

on the good government and peace of the kingdom of England; secondly, to

consider for the external defence of the kingdom, by land as well as by

sea; and thirdly, to make arrangements for the continuation of the war

with France." The Commons were then bidden to retire, and deliberate

apart in their own chamber in the Chapter-house of the Abbey of

Westminster. At the demand of the Commons, certain bishops and barons

were appointed to deliberate with them, and give them their advice on

the subject of the subsidy to be granted to the King. The next point was

the choice of a Speaker, and the election made by the Commons was in

itself a mark of their opposition to the Duke of Lancaster. Peter de la

Mare, the man chosen, was the steward of Edmund Mortimer, Earl of March,

who had married Philippa, the only child of Lionel Duke of Clarence,

Lancaster's elder brother. Philippa had a prior right to the throne to

that of John of Gaunt, and therefore she and her husband necessarily

opposed his ambitious schemes. Peter de la Mare's policy was sure to be

opposition to the Duke. He was, a contemporary chronicler tells us, "a

man of abundant wisdom and courage; a lover of justice and truth;

neither the bribes nor the threats of his enemies could deter him from

the right course."

With regard to the demand for a subsidy, the Commons consented to grant

the same sum as they had given three years before; more they would not

give on account of the great scarcity throughout the land produced by

the plague, the murrain amongst the cattle, and the failure of the

crops. This matter once settled, the Commons proceeded to what they

considered the chief business of the session, the petitions about

grievances. Headed by Peter de la Mare, they carried their answer about

the subsidy to the council and the barons.

Then, standing before the nobles, amongst whom John of Gaunt stood

foremost, the Speaker began to disclose the grievances of the country.

The people, he complained, were exceedingly weighed down by taxes; but

even this they would have borne patiently had the money been usefully

employed; yet in spite of the great expenditure the wars had not

prospered. The Commons demanded an account of the way in which the money

had been spent. "Neither is it credible," concluded the Speaker, "that

the King should want such an infinite treasure, if they were faithful

that served him." Great was the indignation of Lancaster at this

insolence of the Commons, as he called it. Full of wrath, he declared

his intention of silencing them next day by a show of his power; but his

followers pointed out to him that the Commons had the support of the

Black Prince, his brother, and that he could not crush them. Afraid lest

they should go further, and allow disclosures to be made about the evil

manner of his own life, he appeared before them next day seemingly mild

and gracious. Then the Commons went on with their proceedings. They

stated that, on account of the great wars abroad, the present Council

was insufficient to manage the affairs of the state; and they asked that

ten or twelve bishops, lords, and others be added to strengthen the

Council. They next unfolded a long list of grievances, which showed the

disordered condition and the maladministration of the country.

They petitioned, first of all, that the King's guilty officers be

punished, they insisted that such heavy taxation would not have been

necessary, considering the immense amount of money that had come into

the kingdom as ransoms for French prisoners, if only it had been

properly and honestly administered. They promised that the King should

have no difficulty in getting plenty of money for the war, and his other

necessities, if he would first dismiss and punish his ministers. They

attacked Richard Lyons, a London merchant, and a creature of the Duke's.

He had had patents granted him by members of the Council, to buy up

merchandise, and sell it again at his own price; he had also caused

customs to be put upon wool and other commodities, which he levied

principally for his own profit. It was no wonder that the Duke, who

interfered in this way with the trade of London, should draw upon

himself the hatred of the Londoners. Lyons tried to save himself by

sending a bribe to the Prince of Wales, in the shape of a barrel

containing £1,000. The Prince refused it with scorn; but afterwards

regretted his refusal, saying that he would have "done a good deed by

sending it to the knights that travail for the realm." Lyons then sent

his money to the King, who kept it, saying "that he took the same in

part payment of the money that was owing to him; for this and much more

he owed him, and had not presented him with anything but his own."

Lyons could not save himself. He was ordered to be imprisoned at the

King's pleasure, to lose the freedom of the city, and have all his goods

seized.

Next followed the impeachment of Lord Latimer, another creature of the

Duke's, who was Chamberlain and Privy Councillor, and governor of a

castle in Britany, where he had appropriated large sums of money, and

had taken bribes to surrender places to the French. He was also

sentenced to be fined and imprisoned. Other accusations followed, all

founded on much the same charge--appropriation of the public money. One

man, William Ellis, an accomplice of Lyons, had extorted money at

Yarmouth from ships driven by stress of weather into the port. Another,

John Peachy, had obtained from Lyons a patent giving him the exclusive

right of selling sweet wines in London. Sir John Neville was sentenced

to be fined and imprisoned, because he had allowed some soldiers whom

he was conducting to France to ravage the country all the way to

Southampton. The Commons declared in plain terms that the people of

England would no longer consent to have their interests trampled upon,

and their trade interfered with, for the sake of enriching a greedy

baronage and its creatures. In all this they were firmly supported and

encouraged by the Prince of Wales and the good Bishop William of

Wykeham, who was quite restored to the favour of the people. In fact,

the Black Prince had seen that the best policy would be to attempt to

unite against the baronage the Commons and the national clergy. The

Commons were quite ready to welcome the clergy back to office; for they

now saw only too well the selfish policy which had made John of Gaunt

wish to drive them out.

But the Commons did not stop short with attacking the evil counsellors

of John of Gaunt; they went on to impeach Alice Perrers, the woman who

had gained such an unworthy influence over the King in his old age. They

passed an ordinance against "certain women of the court, and especially

Alice Perrers, who interfered with the course of justice in the kingdom,

sitting side by side on the bench with the judges." Alice Perrers was

examined before the nobles, and banished from the court. She was obliged

to swear that she would keep away from the King.

It was by its vigorous attack upon all these abuses, and its desire to

restore an orderly and discreet administration, that this Parliament

earned for itself the name of "The Good Parliament." It established the

right of Parliament to demand the redress of grievances, and to impeach

the King's ministers. When we remember that at the beginning of the

reign of Edward III. the one function of the Commons was to vote

subsidies, we shall realize how great the increase of the power and

influence of Parliament must have been during the reign, to admit of

such proceedings as those of the Good Parliament taking place.

Parliament was now strong enough to cause the ministers of the crown to

be removed, and new ones more pleasing to it to take their place.

Knyvet, the Lord Chancellor, was the only one of the old ministry who

was retained.

Life of Edward the Black Prince · 第 16 / 18 章