CHAPTER I.

Produced by Chris Curnow and the Online Distributed

Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was

produced from images generously made available by The

Internet Archive.)

COAL; AND WHAT WE GET FROM IT.

THE ROMANCE OF SCIENCE.

COAL AND WHAT WE GET FROM IT.

A Romance of Applied Science.

EXPANDED FROM THE NOTES OF A LECTURE

DELIVERED IN THE THEATRE OF THE

LONDON INSTITUTION, JAN. 20th, 1890.

BY RAPHAEL MELDOLA, F.R.S., F.I.C., &C.,

PROFESSOR OF CHEMISTRY IN THE FINSBURY TECHNICAL COLLEGE,

CITY AND GUILDS OF LONDON INSTITUTE.

PUBLISHED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE COMMITTEE

OF GENERAL LITERATURE AND EDUCATION APPOINTED BY THE

SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE.

LONDON:

SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE,

NORTHUMBERLAND AVENUE, CHARING CROSS, W.C.;

43, QUEEN VICTORIA STREET, E.C.

BRIGHTON: 135, NORTH STREET. NEW YORK: E. & J. B. YOUNG & CO.

1891.

TO WILLIAM HENRY PERKIN,

PH.D., F.R.S.,

THE FOUNDER OF THE COAL-TAR COLOUR INDUSTRY,

THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED BY THE AUTHOR.

PREFACE.

This is neither a technical manual, nor a treatise dealing with the

history of a particular branch of applied science, but it partakes

somewhat of the character of both. It is an attempt--perhaps somewhat

bold--to present in a popular form an account of the great industry which

has arisen out of the waste from the gas-works. In the strictest sense it

is a romance of dirt. To render intelligible the various stages in the

evolution of the industry, without assuming any knowledge of chemical

science on the part of the general reader, has by no means been an easy

task, and I have great misgivings as to the success of my effort. But

there is so much misapprehension concerning the history and the mode of

production of colouring-matters from coal-tar, that any attempt to strip

the industry of its mystery in this, the land of its birth, cannot but

find justification. Although the theme is a favourite one with popular

lecturers, it is generally treated in a superficial way, leaving the

audience only in possession of the bare fact that dyestuffs, &c., have by

some means or other been obtained from coal-tar. I have endeavoured to go

somewhat beyond this, and to give some notion of the scientific principles

underlying the subject. If the reader can follow these pages, in which not

a chemical formula appears, with the same interest and with the same

desire to know more about the subject that was manifested by the audience

at the London Institution, before whom the lecture was delivered, my

object will have been accomplished. To the Board of Managers of that

Institution my thanks are due for the opportunity which they have afforded

me of attempting to extend that popular knowledge of applied science for

which there is such a healthy craving in the public mind at the present

time.

R. M.

_6 Brunswick Square, W.C._

CONTENTS.

CHAPTER I.

Origin of Coal, 9. Coal of various ages, 11. Graphite, 12. Recent

Vegetable Deposits, 13. Mode of occurrence of Coal, 13. Structure of Coal,

15. Uses of Coal, 16. Coal a source of Energy, 17. Mechanical Equivalent

of Heat, 19. Value of Coal as a Fuel, 20. Small efficiency of

Steam-engines, 21. Mechanical value of Coal, 22. Whence Coal derives its

Energy, 22. Chemical Composition of Coal, 23. Growth of Plants, 26. Solar

Energy, 28. Transformation of Wood into Coal, 30. Destructive Distillation

of Coal, 33. Experiments of Becher, 34; of Dean Clayton, 35; of Stephen

Hales, 37; of Bishop Watson, 37; of the Earl of Dundonald, 39. Coal-gas

introduced by Murdoch, 40. Spread of the new Illuminant, 41. Manufacture

of Coal-gas, 42. Quantitative results, 45. Uses of Coke, 47. Goethe's

visit to Stauf, 48. Bishop Watson on waste from Coke-ovens, 50. Shale-oil

Industry, 50. History of Coal-mining, 57. Introduction of Coal into

London, 58. The Coal resources of the United Kingdom, 60. Competition

between Electricity and Coal-gas, 62.

CHAPTER II.

Ammoniacal Liquor of Gas-works, 64. Origin of the Ammonia, 65. Ammonia as

a Fertilizer, 65. Other uses of Ammonia, 67. Annual production of Ammonia,

68. Utilization of Coal-tar, 69. The Creosoting of Timber, 70. Early uses

of the Light Tar Oils, 71. Discovery of Benzene by Faraday; isolation from

Tar Oil by Hofmann and Mansfield, 73. Discovery of Mauve by Perkin, 74.

History of Aniline, 75. The Distillation of Coal-tar, 77. Separation of

the Hydrocarbons of the Benzene Series, 82. Manufacture of Aniline and

Toluidine, 87. History and Manufacture of Magenta, 89. Blue, Violet, and

Green Dyes from Magenta, 92. The Triphenylmethane Group, 97. The Azines,

108. Lauth's Violet and Methylene Blue, 111. Aniline Black, 114.

Introduction of Azo-dyes, 115. Aniline Yellow, Manchester Brown, and

Chrysoidine, 118. The Indulines, 121. Chronological Summary, 122.

CHAPTER III.

Natural Sources of Indigo, 124. Syntheses of the Colouring-matter, 126.

Carbolic Oil, its treatment and its constituents, 129. Phenol Dyes, 132.

Salicylic Acid and its uses, 134. Picric Acid, 136. Naphthalene and its

applications, 139. The Albo-carbon Light, 140. Phthalic Acid and the

Phthaleins, 145. Magdala Red, 149. Azo-dyes from the Naphthols,

Naphthylamines, and their Sulpho-acids, 150. Naphthol Green, the Oxazines,

and the Indophenols, 161. Creosote Oil, 163. The Lucigen Burner, 163.

Anthracene Oil, 167. The Discovery of Artificial Alizarin, and its effects

on Madder growing, 167. The industrial isolation of Anthracene and its

conversion into Colouring-matters, 171. Pitch, and its uses, 176. Patent

Fuel, or Briquettes, 178. Coal-tar products in Pharmacy, 178. Aromatic

Perfumes, 185. Coal-tar Saccharin, 186. Coal-tar Products in Photography,

188. Coal-tar Products in Biology, 192. Value of the Coal-tar Industry,

194. The Coal-tar Industry in relation to pure Science, 196. Permanence of

the Artificial Colouring-matters, 198. Chronological Summary, 200.

Addendum, 202.

COAL; AND WHAT WE GET FROM IT.

CHAPTER I.

"Hier [1771] fand sich eine zusammenhaengende Ofenreihe, wo

Steinkohlen abgeschwefelt und zum Gebrauch bei Eisenwerken tauglich

gemacht werden sollten; allein zu gleicher Zeit wollte man Oel und

Harz auch zu Gute machen, ja sogar den Russ nicht missen, und so

unterlag den vielfachen Absichten alles zusammen."--Goethe, _Wahrheit

und Dichtung_, Book X.

To get at the origin of the familiar fuel which blazes in our grates with

such lavish waste of heat, and pollutes the atmosphere of our towns with

its unconsumed particles, we must in imagination travel backwards through

the course of time to a very remote period of the world's history. Ages

before man, or the species of animals and plants which are contemporaneous

with him, had appeared upon the globe, there flourished a vegetation not

only remarkable for its luxuriance, but also for the circumstance that it

consisted to a preponderating extent of non-flowering or cryptogamic

plants. In swampy areas, such as the deltas at the mouths of great rivers,

or in shallow lagoons bordering a coast margin, the jungles of ferns and

tree-ferns, club-mosses and horse-tails, sedges, grasses, &c., grew and

died down year by year, forming a consolidated mass of vegetable matter

much in the same way that a peat bed or a mangrove swamp is accumulating

organic deposits at the present time. In the course of geological change

these beds of compressed vegetation became gradually depressed, so that

marine or fresh-water sediment was deposited over them, and then once more

the vegetation spread and flourished to furnish another accumulation of

vegetable matter, which in its turn became submerged and buried under

sediment, and so on in successive alternations of organic and sedimentary

deposits.

But these conditions of climate, and the distribution of land and water

favourable to the accumulation of large deposits of vegetable matter,

gradually gave way to a new order of things. The animals and plants

adapted to the particular conditions of existence described above gave

rise to descendants modified to meet the new conditions of life. Enormous

thicknesses of other deposits were laid down over the beds of vegetable

remains and their intercalated strata of clay, shale, sandstone, and

limestone. The chapter of the earth's history thus sealed up and stowed

away among her geological records relates to a period now known as the

Carboniferous, because of the prevalence of seams or beds of coal

throughout the formation at certain levels. By the slow process of

chemical decomposition without access of air, modified also by the

mechanical pressure of superincumbent formations, the vegetable deposits

accumulated in the manner described have, in the lapse of ages, become

transformed into the substance now familiar to us as coal.

Although coal is thus essentially a product of Carboniferous age, it must

not be concluded that this mineral is found in no other geological

formation. The conditions favourable for the deposition of beds of

vegetable matter have prevailed again and again, at various periods of

geological time and on different parts of the earth, although there is at

present no distinct evidence that such a luxuriant growth of vegetation,

combined with the other necessary conditions, has ever existed at any

other period in the history of the globe. Thus in the very oldest rocks of

Canada and the northern States of America, in strata which take us back to

the dawn of geological history, there is found abundance of the mineral

graphite, the substance from which black-lead pencils are made, which is

almost pure carbon. Now most geologists admit that graphite represents the

carbon which formed part of the woody tissue of plants that lived during

those remote times, so that this mineral represents coal in the ultimate

stage of carbonization. In some few instances true coal has been found

converted into graphite _in situ_ by the intrusion of veins of volcanic

rock (basalt), so that the connection between the two minerals is more

than a mere matter of surmise.

Then again we have coal of pre-Carboniferous age in the Old Red Sandstone

of Scotland, this being of course younger in point of time than the

graphite of the Archaean rocks. Coal of post-Carboniferous date is found in

beds of Permian age in Bavaria, of Triassic age in Germany, in the

Inferior Oolite of Yorkshire belonging to the Jurassic period, and in the

Lower Cretaceous deposits of north-western Germany. Coming down to more

recent geological periods, we have a coal seam of over thirty feet in

thickness in the northern Tyrol of Eocene age; we have brown coal deposits

of Oligocene age in Belgium and Austria, and, most remarkable of all, coal

has been found of Miocene, that is, mid-Tertiary age, in the Arctic

regions of Greenland within a few degrees of the North Pole. Thus the

formation of coal appears to have been going on in one area or another

ever since vegetable life appeared on the globe, and in the peat bogs,

delta jungles, and mangrove swamps of the present time we may be said to

have the deposition of potential coal deposits for future ages now going

on.

Although in some parts of the world coal seams of pre-Carboniferous age

often reach the dignity of workable thickness, the coal worked in this

country is entirely of Carboniferous date. After the explanation of the

mode of formation of coal which has been given, the phenomena presented by

a section through any of our coal measures will be readily intelligible

(see Fig. 1). We find seams of coal separated by beds of sandstone,

limestone, or shale representing the encroachment of the sea and the

deposition of marine or estuarine sediment over the beds of vegetable

remains. The seams of coal, varying in thickness from a few inches to

three or four feet, always rest on a bed of clay, known technically as the

"underclay," which represents the soil on which the plants originally

grew. In some instances the seams of coal with their thin "partings" of

clay reach an aggregate thickness of twenty to thirty feet. In many cases

the very roots of the trees are found upright in a fossilized condition in

the underclay, and can be traced upwards into the overlying coal beds; or

the completely carbonized trunk is found erect in the position in which

the tree lived and died (see Fig. 2).

[Illustration: FIG. 1.--Section through Carboniferous strata showing seams

of coal. Dislocations, or "faults," so common in the Coal Measures, are

shown at H, T, and F. Intrusions of igneous rock are shown at D. At B is

shown the coalescence of two seams, and at N the local thinning of the

seam. The vertical lines indicate the shafts of coal mines.]

[Illustration: FIG. 2.--Section showing coal seams and upright trunks

attached to roots _in situ_. A', A'', A''', beds of shale. B, coal seams.

C, underclay. D, sandstone.]

Owing to the chemical and mechanical forces to which the original

vegetable deposit has been subjected, the organic structure of coal has

for the most part been lost. Occasionally, however, portions of leaves,

stems, and the structure of woody fibre can be detected, and thin sections

often show the presence of spore-cases of club-mosses in such numbers that

certain kinds of coal appear to be entirely composed of such remains. But

although coal itself now furnishes but little direct evidence of its

vegetable origin, the interstratified clays, shales, and other deposits

often abound with fossilized plant remains in every state of

preservation, from the most delicate fern frond to the prostrate tree

trunk many yards in length. It is from such evidence that our knowledge of

the Carboniferous flora has been chiefly derived.

Now this carbonized vegetation of a past age, the history of which has

been briefly sketched in the foregoing pages, is one of the chief sources

of our industrial supremacy as a nation. We use it as fuel for generating

the steam which drives our engines, or for the production of heat wherever

heat is wanted. In metallurgical operations we consume enormous quantities

of coal for extracting metals from their ores, this consumption being

especially great in the case of iron smelting. For this last operation

some kinds of raw coal are unsuitable, and such coal is converted into

coke before being used in the blast furnace. The fact that the iron ore

and the coal occur in the same district is another cause of our high rank

as a manufacturing nation.

It has often been a matter of wonder that iron ore and the material

essential for extracting the metal from it should be found associated

together, but it is most likely that this combination of circumstances,

which has been so fortunate for our industrial prosperity, is not a mere

matter of accident, but the result of cause and effect. It is, in fact,

probable that the iron ore owes its origin to the reduction and

precipitation of iron compounds by the decomposing vegetation of the

Carboniferous period, and this would account for the occurrence of the

bands of ironstone in the same deposits with the coal. In former times,

when the area in the south-east of England known as the Weald was thickly

wooded, the towns and villages of this district were the chief centres of

the iron manufacture. The ore, which was of a different kind to that found

in the coal-fields, was smelted by means of the charcoal obtained from the

wood of the Wealden forests, and the manufacture lingered on in Kent,

Sussex, and Surrey till late in the last century, the railings round St.

Paul's, London, being made from the last of the Sussex iron. When the

northern coal-fields came to be extensively worked, and ironstone was

found so conveniently at hand, the Wealden iron manufacture declined, and

in many places in the district we now find disused furnaces and heaps of

buried slag as the last witnesses of an extinct industry.

From coal we not only get mechanical work when we burn it to generate heat

under a steam boiler, but we also get chemical work out of it when we

employ it to reduce a metallic ore, or when we make use of it as a source

of carbon in the manufacture of certain chemical products, such as the

alkalies. We have therefore in coal a substance which supplies us with the

power of doing work, either mechanical, chemical, or some other form, and

anything which does this is said to be a source of energy. It is a

familiar doctrine of modern science that energy, like matter, is

indestructible. The different forms of energy can be converted into one

another, such, for example, as chemical energy into heat or electricity,

heat into mechanical work or electricity, electricity into heat, and so

forth, but the relationship between these convertible forms is fixed and

invariable. From a given quantity of chemical energy represented, let us

say, by a certain weight of coal, we can get a certain fixed amount of

heat and no more. We can employ that heat to work a steam-engine, which we

can in turn use as a source of electricity by causing it to drive a

dynamo-machine. Then this doctrine of science teaches us that our given

weight of coal in burning evolves a quantity of heat which is the

equivalent of the chemical energy which it contains, and that this

quantity of heat has also its equivalent in mechanical work or in

electricity. This great principle--known as the Conservation of

Energy--has been gradually established by the joint labours of many

philosophers from the time of Newton downwards, and foremost among these

must be ranked the late James Prescott Joule, who was the first to measure

accurately the exact amount of work corresponding to a given quantity of

heat.

In measuring heat (as distinguished from temperature) it is customary to

take as a unit the quantity necessary to raise a given weight of water

from one specified temperature to another. In measuring work, it is

customary to take as a unit the amount necessary to raise a certain weight

at a specified place to a certain height against the force of gravity at

that place. Joule's unit of heat is the quantity necessary to raise one

pound of water from 60 deg. to 61 deg. F., and his unit of work is the foot-pound,

_i.e._ the quantity necessary to raise a weight of one pound to a height

of one foot. Now the quantitative relationship between heat and work

measured by Joule is expressed by saying that the mechanical equivalent of

heat is about 772 foot-pounds, which means that the quantity of heat that

would raise one pound of water 1 deg. F. would, if converted into work, be

capable of raising a one-pound weight to a height of 772 feet, or a weight

of 772 lbs. to a height of one foot.

This mechanical equivalent ought to tell us exactly how much power is

obtainable from a certain weight of coal if we measure the quantity of

heat given out when it is completely burnt. Thus an average Lancashire

coal is said to have a calorific power of 13,890, which means that 1 lb.

of such coal on complete combustion would raise 13,890 lbs. of water

through a temperature of 1 deg. F., if we could collect all the heat generated

and apply it to this purpose. But if we express this quantity of heat in

its mechanical equivalent, and suppose that we could get the corresponding

quantity of work out of our pound of coal, we should be grievously

mistaken. For in the first place, we could not collect all the heat given

out, because a great deal is communicated to the products of combustion by

which it is absorbed, and locked up in a form that renders it incapable of

measurement by our thermometers. In the next place, if we make an

allowance for the quantity of heat which thus disappears, even then the

corrected calorific power converted into its mechanical equivalent would

not express the quantity of work practically obtainable from the coal.

In the most perfectly constructed engine the whole amount of heat

generated by the combustion of the coal is not available for heating the

boiler--a certain quantity is lost by radiation, by heating the material

of the furnace, &c., by being carried away by the products of combustion

and in other ways. Moreover, some of the coal escapes combustion by being

allowed to go away as smoke, or by remaining as cinders. Then again, in

the engine itself a good deal of heat is lost through various channels,

and much of the working power is frittered away through friction, which

reconverts the mechanical power into its equivalent in heat, only this

heat is not available for further work, and is thus lost so far as the

efficiency of the engine is concerned. These sources of loss are for the

most part unavoidable, and are incidental to the necessary imperfections

of our mechanism. But even with the most perfectly conceivable constructed

engine it has been proved that we can only expect one-sixth of the total

energy of the fuel to appear in the form of work, and in a very good

steam-engine of the present time we only realize in the form of useful

work about one-tenth of the whole quantity of energy contained in the

coal. Although steam power is one of the most useful agencies that science

has placed at the disposal of man, it is not generally recognized by the

uninitiated how wasteful we are of Nature's resources. One of the greatest

problems of applied science yet to be solved is the conversion of the

energy latent in coal or other fuel into a quantity of useful work

approximating to the mechanical equivalent much more closely than has

hitherto been accomplished.

But although we only get this small fraction of the whole working

capability out of coal, the actual amount of energy dormant in this

substance cannot but strike us as being prodigious. It has already been

said that a pound of coal on complete combustion gives out 13,890 heat

units. This quantity of heat corresponds to over 10,000,000 foot-pounds of

work. A horse-power may be considered as corresponding to 550 foot-pounds

of work per second, or 1,980,000 foot-pounds per hour. Thus our pound of

coal contains a store of energy which, if capable of being completely

converted into work without loss, would in one hour do the work of about

five and a half horses. The strangest tales of necromancy can hardly be so

startling as these sober figures when introduced for the first time to

those unaccustomed to consider the stupendous powers of Nature.

If energy is indestructible, we have a right to inquire in the next place

from whence the coal has derived this enormous store. A consideration of

the origin of coal, and of its chemical composition, will enable this

question to be answered. The origin of coal has already been discussed.

Chemically considered, it consists chiefly of carbon together with smaller

quantities of hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen, and a certain amount of

mineral matter which is left as ash when the coal is burnt. The following

average analyses of different varieties will give an idea of its chemical

composition:--

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Variety of Coal. | Carbon. | Hydrogen. | Oxygen. | Nitrogen. | Ash.

-------------------+---------+-----------+---------+-----------+-----

S. Staffordshire | 73.4 | 5.0 | 11.7 | 1.7 | 2.3

Newcastle (Caking) | 80.0 | 5.3 | 10.7 | 2.2 | 1.7

Cannel (Wigan) | 81.2 | 5.6 | 7.9 | 2.1 | 2.5

Anthracite (Welsh) | 90.1 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.6

---------------------------------------------------------------------

There are in addition to these constituents small quantities of sulphur

and a certain variable amount of water (5 to 10 per cent.) in all coals,

but the elements which most concern us are those heading the respective

columns.

From the foregoing analyses, which express the percentage composition, it

will be seen that carbon is by far the most important constituent of coal.

Carbon is a chemical element which is found in a crystalline form in

nature as the diamond, and which forms a most important constituent of all

living matter, whether animal or vegetable. Woody fibre contains a large

quantity of this element, and the carbon of coal is thus accounted for; it

was accumulated during the growth of the plants of the Carboniferous

period.

Now carbon is one of those elementary substances which are said to be

_combustible_, which means that if we heat it in atmospheric air it gives

out heat and light, and gradually disappears, or, as we say, burns away.

The heat which is given out during combustion represents the chemical

energy stored up in the combustible, for combustion is in fact the

chemical union of one substance with another with the development of heat

and light. When carbon burns in air, therefore, a chemical combination

takes place, the air supplying the other substance with which the carbon

combines. That other substance is also an element--it is the invisible gas

which chemists call oxygen, and which forms one-fifth of the bulk of

atmospheric air, the remainder consisting of the gas nitrogen and small

quantities of other gases with which we shall have more to do

subsequently. When oxygen and carbon unite under the conditions described,

the product is an invisible gas known as carbon dioxide, and it is because

this gas is invisible that the carbon seems to disappear altogether on

combustion. In reality, however, the carbon is not lost, for matter is as

indestructible as energy, but it is converted into the dioxide which

escapes as gas under ordinary circumstances. If, however, we burn a given

weight of carbon with free access of air, and collect the product of

combustion and weigh it, we shall find that the product weighs more than

the carbon, by an amount which represents the weight of oxygen with which

the element has combined. By careful experiment it would be found that

one part by weight of carbon would give three and two-third parts by

weight of carbon dioxide. If, moreover, we could measure the quantity of

heat given out by the complete combustion of one pound of carbon, it would

be found that this quantity would raise 14,544 lbs. of water through 1 deg.

F., a quantity of heat corresponding to over eleven million foot-pounds of

work, or about seven and three-quarters horse-power per hour.

Here then is the chief source of the energy of coal--the carbon of the

plants which lived on this earth long ages ago has lain buried in the

earth, and when we ignite a coal fire this carbon combines with

atmospheric oxygen, and restores some of the energy that was stored up at

that remote period. But the whole of the energy dormant in coal is not due

to the carbon, for this fuel contains another combustible element,

hydrogen, which is also a gas when in the free state, and which is one of

the constituents of water, the other constituent being oxygen. In fact,

there is more latent energy in hydrogen, weight for weight, than there is

in carbon, for one pound of hydrogen on complete combustion would give

enough heat to raise 62,032 lbs. of water through 1 deg. F. Hydrogen in

burning combines with oxygen to form water, so that the products of the

complete combustion of coal are carbon dioxide and water. The amount of

heat contributed by the hydrogen of coal is, however, comparatively

insignificant, because there is only a small percentage of this element

present, and we thus come to the conclusion that nearly all the work that

is done by our steam-engines of the present time is drawn from the latent

energy of the carbon of the fossilized vegetation of the Carboniferous

period.

The conclusion to which we have now been led leaves us with the question

as to the _origin_ of the energy of coal still unanswered. We shall have

to go a step further before this part of our story is complete, and we

must form some kind of idea of the way in which a plant grows. Carbon

being the chief source of energy in coal, we may for the present confine

ourselves to this element, of which woody fibre contains about 50 per

cent. Consider the enormous gain in weight during the growth of a plant;

compare the acorn, weighing a few grains, with the oak, weighing many

tons, which arises from it after centuries of growth. If matter is

indestructible, and never comes into existence spontaneously, where does

all this carbon come from? It is a matter of common knowledge that the

carbon of plants is supplied by the atmosphere in the form of carbon

dioxide--the gas which has already been referred to as resulting from the

combustion of carbon. This gas exists in the atmosphere in small

quantity--about four volumes in 10,000 volumes of air; but insignificant

as this may appear, it is all important for the life of plants, since it

is from this source that they derive their carbon. The origin of the

carbon dioxide, which is present as a normal constituent of the

atmosphere, does not directly concern us at present, but it is important

to bear in mind that this gas is one of the products of the respiration of

animals, so that the animal kingdom is one of the sources of plant carbon.

The transition from carbon dioxide to woody fibre is brought about in the

plant by a series of chemical processes, and through the formation of a

number of intermediate products in a manner which is not yet thoroughly

understood; but since carbon dioxide consists of carbon and oxygen, and

since plants feed upon carbon dioxide, appropriating the carbon and giving

off the oxygen as a waste product, it is certain that work of some kind

must be performed. This is evident, because it has been explained that

when carbon combines with oxygen a great deal of heat is given out, and as

this heat is the equivalent of the energy stored in the carbon, it follows

from the doctrine of the Conservation of Energy, that in order to separate

the carbon from the oxygen again, just the same amount of energy must be

supplied as is evolved during the combustion of the carbon. If a pound of

carbon in burning to carbon dioxide gives out heat equivalent to eleven

million foot-pounds of work, we must apply the same amount of work to the

carbon dioxide produced to separate it into its constituents. Neither a

plant nor any living thing can create energy any more than it can create

matter, and just as the matter composing a living organism is assimilated

from external sources, so must we look to an external source for the

energy which enables the plant to do this large amount of chemical work.

The separation of carbon from oxygen in the plant is effected by means of

energy supplied by the sun. The great white hot globe which is the centre

of our system, and round which this earth and the planets are moving, is a

reservoir from which there is constantly pouring forth into space a

prodigious quantity of energy. It must be remembered that the sun is more

than a million times greater in bulk than our earth. It has been

calculated by Sir William Thomson that every square foot of the sun's

surface is radiating energy equivalent to 7000 horse-power in work. On a

clear summer day the earth receives from the sun in our latitude energy

equal to about 1450 horse-power per acre. To keep up this supply by the

combustion of coal, we should have to burn for every square foot of the

sun's surface between three and four pounds per second. A small fraction

of this solar energy reaches our earth in the form of radiant heat and

light, and it is the latter which enables the plant to perform the work of

separating the carbon from the oxygen with which it is chemically

combined. It is, in fact, well known that the growth of plants--that is,

the assimilation of carbon and the liberation of oxygen--only takes place

under the influence of light. This function is performed by the leaves

which contain the green colouring-matter known as chlorophyll, the

presence of which is essential to the course of the chemical changes.

If we now sum up the results to which we have been led, it will be seen--

(1) That the chief source of the energy contained in coal is the carbon.

(2) That this carbon formed part of the plants which grew during the

Carboniferous period.

(3) That the carbon thus accumulated was supplied to the plants by the

carbon dioxide existing in the atmosphere at that time.

(4) That the separation of the carbon from the oxygen was effected in the

presence of chlorophyll, by means of the solar energy transmitted to the

earth during the Carboniferous period.

We thus arrive at the interesting conclusion, that the heat which we get

from coal is sunlight in another form. For every pound of coal that we now

burn, and for every unit of heat or work that we get from it, an

equivalent quantity of sunlight was converted into the latent energy of

chemical separation during the time that the coal plant grew. This energy

has remained stored up in the earth ever since, and reappears in the form

of heat when we cause the coal to undergo combustion. It is related that

George Stephenson when asked what force drove his locomotive, replied that

it was "bottled-up sunshine," and we now see that he was much nearer the

truth in making this answer than he could have been aware of at the time.

Before passing on to the consideration of the different products which we

get from coal, it will be desirable to discuss a little more fully the

nature of the change which occurs during the transformation of wood into

coal. Pure woody fibre consists of a substance known to chemists as

cellulose, which contains fifty per cent. of carbon, the remainder of the

compound being made up of hydrogen and oxygen. It is thus obvious that

during the fossilization of the wood some of the other constituents are

lost, and the percentage of carbon by this means raised. We can trace this

change from wood, through peat, lignite, and the different varieties of

coal up to graphite, which is nearly pure carbon. It is in fact possible

to construct a series showing the conversion of wood into coal, this

series comprising the varieties given in the table on p. 23, as well as

younger and older vegetable deposits. The series will be--

I. Woody fibre (cellulose).

II. Peat from Dartmoor.

III. Lignite, or brown coal, an imperfectly carbonized vegetable

deposit of more recent geological age than true coal.

IV. Average bituminous coal.

V. Cannel coal from Wigan.

VI. Anthracite from Wales.

VII. Graphite, the oldest carbonaceous mineral.

The percentage of the chief elements in the members of this series is--

Carbon. Hydrogen. Oxygen.

I. 50.0 6.0 44.0

II. 54.0 5.2 28.2

III. 66.3 5.6 22.8

IV. 77.0 5.0 11.2

V. 81.2 5.6 7.9

VI. 90.1 3.2 2.5

VII. 94-99.5, the remainder being ash.

In the above table the increase of carbon and the decrease of oxygen is

well brought out; the hydrogen also on the whole decreases, although with

some irregularity. The exact course of the chemical change which occurs

during the passage of wood into coal is at present involved in obscurity.

The oxygen may be eliminated in the form of water or of carbon dioxide or

both; some of the carbon is got rid of in the form of marsh gas, a

compound of carbon and hydrogen, which forms the chief constituent of the

dangerous "fire-damp" of coal mines.

Marsh gas is an inflammable gas which becomes explosive when mixed with

air and ignited; it often escapes with great violence during the working

of coal seams, the jets blowing out from the coal or underclay with a

rushing noise, indicative of the high pressure under which the hydrocarbon

gas has accumulated. These jets of escaping gas are known amongst miners

as "blowers." If the air of a mine contains a sufficient quantity of the

gas, and a flame accidentally fires the mixture, there results one of

those disastrous explosions with which the history of coal mining has

unfortunately only made us too familiar.

From the account of coal which has thus far been rendered, it will be seen

that as a source of mechanical power, we are far from using it as

economically as could be desired; and when we look at our open grates with

clouds of unburnt carbon particles escaping up the chimney, and so

constructed that only a small fraction of the total heat warms our rooms,

it will be seen that the tale of waste is still more deplorable. But we

are at present rather concerned with what we actually do get from coal

than with what we ought to get from it, and here, when we come to deal

with the various material products, we shall have a better account to

present.

If instead of heating coal in contact with air and allowing it to burn, we

heat it in a closed vessel, such as a retort, it undergoes decomposition

with the formation of various gaseous, liquid, and solid products. This

process of heating an organic compound in a closed vessel without access

of air and collecting the products, is called destructive distillation.

The tobacco-pipe experiment of our boyhood is our first practical

introduction to the destructive distillation of coal. We put some powdered

coal into the bowl of the pipe, plaster up the opening with clay and then

insert the bowl in a fire, allowing the stem to project from between the

bars of the grate. In a few minutes a stream of gas issues from the

orifice of the stem; on applying a light it burns with a luminous flame,

and we have made coal-gas on a small scale.

In the destructive distillation of organic substances, such as wood or

coal, there are always produced four things--gas, watery liquid, and

viscous products known as tar, while a residue of coke or charcoal is left

in the retort. This is a very old observation, and was made so long ago

that it becomes interesting as a point in the history of applied science

to know who first submitted coal to destructive distillation. According to

Dr. Gustav Schultz, we must credit a German with this observation, which

was made towards the end of the seventeenth century (about 1680) by a

chemist named Johann Joachim Becher. The experiment is described in such a

quaint manner that the exact words of the author are worthy of being

reproduced, and the passage is here given as translated by Dr. Lunge in

his work on _Coal Tar and Ammonia_--

"In Holland they have peat, and in England pit-coals; neither of them is

very good for burning, be it in rooms or for smelting. But I have found a

way, not merely to burn both kinds into good coal (coke) which not any

more smokes nor stinks, but with their flame to smelt equally well as with

wood, so that a foot of such coal makes flames 10 feet long. That I have

demonstrated with pit-coal at the Hague, and here in England at Mr.

Boyles', also at Windsor on the large scale. In this connection it is also

noteworthy that, equally as the Swedes make their tar from firwood, I have

here in England made from pit-coal a sort of tar which is equal to the

Swedish in every way, and for some operations is even superior to it. I

have made proof of it on wood and on ropes, and the proof has been found

right, so that even the king has seen a specimen of it, which is a great

thing in England, and the coal from which the tar has been taken out is

better for use than before."

This enterprising chemist, moreover, brought his results to a practical

issue, for he secured a patent, in conjunction with Henry Serle, in 1681,

for "a new way of making pitch and tarre out of pit-coale, never before

found out or used by any other."

No less interesting is the work of our own clergy during the last century,

when many eminent divines appear to have devoted their leisure to

experimental science. Thus, about the year 1688 the Rev. John Clayton,

D.D., Dean of Kildare, went to examine a ditch two miles from Wigan in

Lancashire, the water in which had been stated to "burn like brandy" when

a flame was applied to it. The Dean ultimately traced the phenomenon to an

escape of inflammable gas from an underlying coal seam, and he followed up

the matter experimentally by studying the destructive distillation of

Wigan coal in retorts. The results were communicated to the Hon. Robert

Boyle, but were not published till after the death of the latter, and long

after the death of the author. The following account is taken from the

abridged edition of the _Philosophical Transactions_ (1739):--

"At first there came over only phlegm, afterwards a black oil, and then

also a spirit arose, which he could noways condense, but it forced the

luting, or broke the glasses. Once, when it had forced the lute, coming

close to it to try to repair it, he observed that the spirit which issued

out caught fire at the flame of the candle, and continued burning with

violence as it issued out in a stream, which he blew out and lighted again

alternately for several times. He then tried to save some of this spirit.

Taking a turbinated receiver, and putting a candle to the pipe of the

receiver while the spirit rose, he observed that it caught flame, and

continued burning at the end of the pipe, though you could not discern

what fed the flame. He then blew it out, and lighted it again several

times; after which he fixed a bladder, flatted and void of air, to the

pipe of the receiver. The oil and phlegm descended into the receiver, but

the spirit, still ascending, blew up the bladder. He then filled a good

many bladders with it, and might have filled an inconceivable number more;

for the spirit continued to rise for several hours, and filled the

bladders almost as fast as a man could have blown them with his mouth; and

yet the quantity of coals he distilled was inconsiderable.

"He kept this spirit in the bladders a considerable time, and endeavoured

several ways to condense it, but in vain. And when he wished to amuse his

friends, he would take one of the bladders, and pricking a hole with a

pin, and compressing gently the bladder near the flame of a candle till it

once took fire, it would then continue flaming till all the spirit was

compressed out of the bladder."[1]

The Rev. Stephen Hales, D.D., Rector of Farringdon, Hants, was the author

of a book entitled _Statical Essays, containing Vegetable Staticks_,

printed in 1726-27, and of which the third edition bears the date 1738. At

p. 182 of this work, after a previous description of the destructive

distillation of all kinds of substances in iron or other retorts, he

says--

"By the same means also I found plenty of air [gas] might be obtained from

minerals. Half a cubick inch, or 158 grains of Newcastle coal, yielded in

distillation 180 cubick inches of air [gas], which arose very fast from

the coal, especially while the yellowish fumes ascended."

Still later, viz. about 1767, we have the Rev. R. Watson, D.D., Regius

Professor of Divinity in the University of Cambridge, and Bishop of

Llandaff, interesting himself in chemistry. He wrote a series of

_Chemical Essays_, one of which is entitled, _Of Pit Coal_, and in this he

describes the production from coal (by destructive distillation) of

illuminating gas, ammonia-water, tar, and coke. He further compares the

relative quantities of the different products from various kinds of coal,

but he appears to have been chiefly interested in the tar, and disregarded

the gas and other products. Not the least interesting part of his book is

the preface, in which he apologizes for his pursuits in the following

words--

"Divines, I hope, will forgive me if I have stolen a few hours, not, I

trust, from the duties of my office, but certainly from the studies of my

profession, and employed them in the cultivation of natural philosophy. I

could plead in my defence, the example of some of the greatest characters

that ever adorned either this University or the Church of England."

This is quoted from the 5th edition, dated 1789, the essay on coal being

in the second of five volumes. As the learned bishop published other works

on chemistry, we may suppose that the forgiveness which he asks from his

brother divines was duly accorded.

None of these preliminary experiments, however, led to any immediate

practical result so far as concerns the use of coal-gas as an illuminating

agent. Towards the end of the last century the lighting of individual

establishments commenced, and the way was thus prepared for the

manufacture of the gas on a large scale. One of the earliest pioneers was

the ninth Earl of Dundonald, an inventive genius, who in 1782 at Culross

Abbey became one of the first practical tar distillers. He secured letters

patent in 1781 for making tar, pitch, essential oils, volatile alkali,

mineral acids, salts, and cinders from coal. The gas was only a waste

product, and, strange as it may appear, the Earl, whose operations were

financial failures, did not realize the importance of the gas, the tar and

coke being considered the only products of value. Here is the account of

the experiments by his son, Admiral Dundonald, the Sailor Earl, quoted

from his _Autobiography of a Seaman_:--

"In prosecution of his coal-tar patent, my father went to reside at the

family estate of Culross Abbey, the better to superintend the works on his

own collieries, as well as others on the adjoining estates of Valleyfield

and Kincardine. In addition to these works, an experimental tar-kiln was

erected near the Abbey, and here coal-gas became accidentally employed in

illumination. Having noticed the inflammable nature of a vapour arising

during the distillation of tar, the Earl, by way of experiment, fitted a

gun-barrel to the eduction pipe leading from the condenser. On applying

fire to the muzzle, a vivid light blazed forth across the waters of the

Frith, becoming, as was afterwards ascertained, distinctly visible on the

opposite shore."

A few years later the foundation of the coal-gas manufacture was laid by

William Murdoch, a Scotchman, who must be credited with the practical

introduction of this illuminating agent. The idea had about the same time

occurred to a Frenchman, Lebon, but in his hands the suggestion did not

take a practical form. Murdoch was overseer of some mines in Cornwall, and

in 1792 he first lighted his own house at Redruth. He then transferred his

services to the great engineering firm of Boulton and Watt at Soho, near

Birmingham, where he erected apparatus in 1798, and in the course of a few

years the whole of this factory was permanently lighted by gas. From this

time the introduction of gas into other factories at Manchester and

Halifax was effected by Murdoch and his pupil, Samuel Clegg. From single

factories coal-gas at length came into use as a street illuminant,

although somewhat tardily. Experiments were made in London at the Lyceum

Theatre in 1803, in Golden Lane in 1807, and in Pall Mall two years later.

It was fifteen years from the time of Murdoch's first installation at Soho

before the streets of London were lighted by gas on a commercial scale.

Our grandfathers seem to have had a great dread of gas, and public

opposition no doubt had much to do with its exclusion from the metropolis.

There were even at that time eminent literary and scientific men who did

not hesitate to cast ridicule upon the proposal, and to declare the scheme

to be only visionary. But about 1806 there came into this country an

energetic German who passed by the name of Winsor, and who is described as

an ignorant adventurer, whose real name was Winzler. Whatever his origin,

he certainly helped to rouse the public interest in gas lighting. He took

out a patent, he gave public lectures, and collected large sums of money

for the establishment of gas companies. Most of the capital was, however,

squandered in futile experiments, but at length in 1813, Westminster

Bridge, and a year later St. Margaret's parish, was successfully lighted.

From that period the use of gas extended, but it was some time before the

public fears were allayed, for it is related that Samuel Clegg, who

undertook the lighting of London Bridge, had at first to light his own

lamps, as nobody could be found to undertake this perilous office. Even

after gas had come into general use as a street illuminant, it must have

found its way but slowly into private houses. In an old play-bill of the

Haymarket Theatre, dated 1843--thirty years after the first introduction

into the streets--it is announced--

"Among the most important Improvements, is the introduction (for the first

time) of Gas as the Medium of Light!"

The manufacture of coal-gas, first rendered practicable by the energy and

skill of the Scotch engineer Murdoch, is now carried on all over the

country on a colossal scale. It is not the province of the present volume

to deal with the details of manufacture, but a short description of the

process is necessary for the proper understanding of the subsequent

portions of the subject (see Fig. 3). The coal is heated in clay

cylinders, called retorts, provided with upright exit pipes through which

the volatile products escape, and are conducted into water contained in a

horizontal pipe termed the "hydraulic main." In the latter the gas is

partially cooled, and deposits most of the tar and watery liquor which

distil over at the high temperature to which the retorts are heated. The

tar and watery liquor are allowed to flow from the hydraulic main into a

pit called the "tar well," and the gas then passes through a series of

curved pipes exposed to the air, in which it is further cooled, and

deposits more of the tar. From this "atmospheric condenser" the gas passes

into a series of vessels filled with coke, down which a fine spray of

water is constantly being blown. These vessels, known as "scrubbers,"

serve to remove the last traces of tar, and some of the volatile sulphur

compounds which are formed from the small quantity of sulphur present in

most coals. The removal of sulphur compounds is a matter of importance,

because when gas is burnt these compounds give rise to acid vapours, which

are deleterious to health and destructive to property.

[Illustration: FIG. 3.--Sectional diagram of gas plant. The retorts and

furnace are on the right; the gas rises through the upright pipe T into

the hydraulic main B; from there it passes into the atmospheric condensers

D, from the lower cistern of which the condensed tar flows into the

tar-well, H. Passing up through K, the gas is conducted into the scrubber,

O, and from there into the purifier, M. From there it emerges through K'

into the purifier, M, and then into the gas-holder for distribution. (From

Schultz's _Chemie des Steinkohlentheers_.)]

From the scrubbers the gas is sent through another series of vessels

packed with trays of lime or oxide of iron, in order to remove

sulphuretted hydrogen and other sulphur compounds as completely as

possible. A small quantity of carbon dioxide is also removed by these

"purifiers," as the presence of this gas impairs the illuminating power of

coal-gas. From the purifiers the gas passes into the gas-holders, where it

is stored for distribution. It remains only to be stated that the

distillation of coal is effected under a pressure somewhat less than that

of the atmosphere, the products of distillation being pumped out of the

retorts by means of a kind of air-pump, called an exhauster, which is

interpolated between the hydraulic main and the condenser, or at some

other part of the purifying system. The coke left in the retort is used as

fuel for burning under the retorts or for other purposes. The oxide of

iron used in the purifiers can be used over and over again for a certain

number of times by exposing it to the air, and when it is finally

exhausted, the sulphur can be burnt out of it and used for making that

most important of all chemical products, sulphuric acid. Thus the small

quantity of sulphur present in the original coal (probably in the form of

iron pyrites) is rendered available for the manufacture of a useful

product.

The necessarily brief description of this important industry will suffice

for the general reader. Those who desire further information on points of

detail will refer to special works. We are here rather concerned with the

subsequent fate of the different products, four of which have to be dealt

with, viz. the gas, watery liquor, tar, and coke. The first and last of

these having already been accounted for--the one as an illuminating agent

and the other as fuel--may now be dismissed.

No story of applied science is complete unless we can form some idea of

the quantities of material used, and the amount of the products obtained.

From one ton of Newcastle coal we get about 10,000 cubic feet of gas, 110

to 120 lbs. of tar, 20 to 25 gallons of watery liquor, and about 1500 lbs.

of coke. Different coals of course give different quantities, and the

latter vary also according to the heat of distillation; but the above

estimate will furnish a good basis for forming our ideas with some

approach to precision. It has been estimated also that we are now

distilling coal at the rate of about ten million tons per annum, so that

there is annually produced 100,000 million cubic feet of gas, and about

500,000 tons of tar, besides proportionate quantities of the other

products. The great metropolitan companies alone are consuming nearly

three million tons annually for the production of gas, a consumption

corresponding to about 6000 cubic feet per head of the population. This of

course takes no account of the coal used for other manufactures or for

domestic purposes, but it is interesting to compare these estimates with

the consumption of coal in London about a century ago, before the

introduction of gas, when, as Bishop Watson tells us in his work already

referred to, the annual consumption was 922,394 tons.

The enormous quantity of tar resulting from our gas manufacture furnishes

the raw material for the production of a multitude of valuable

substances--colouring-matters, medicines, perfumes, flavouring-matters,

burning and lubricating oils, &c. Out of this unsavoury waste material of

the gas-works, the researches of chemists have enabled a great industry to

spring up which is of continually growing importance. It will be the

object of the remaining portion of the present volume to set forth the

achievements of science in this branch of its application. The foundation

of the coal-tar industry was laid in this country--the country where coal

was first distilled on a large scale for the production of gas, and where

the first of the coal-tar colouring-matters was sent forth into commerce.

We are at the present time the largest tar producers in Europe; it has

been stated that we produce more than double the whole quantity of tar

made in the gas-using countries of Europe; but in spite of this, our

manufacture of finished products is by no means in that flourishing

condition which might be expected from our natural resources in the way of

coal, and the facilities which we possess for manufacturing the raw

materials out of it.

But we must now take a glance at some of the other uses to which coal is

put in order to realize more completely the truth of the statement made

some pages back, viz. that this mineral has been the chief source of our

industrial prosperity. Great as is the consumption of coal by the gas

manufacturer, there is an equal or even a greater demand for the

carbonaceous residue left when the coal has been decomposed by destructive

distillation or by partial combustion. This residue is coke--the substance

left in the retorts after the gas manufacture. There is a great demand for

coke for many purposes; it is used in most cases where a cheap smokeless

fuel is required; it is burnt in the furnaces of locomotives and other

engines, and is very largely consumed by the iron smelter in the blast

furnace.

To meet these demands a large quantity of coal is converted into coke by

being burnt in ovens with an insufficient supply of air for complete

combustion, or in suitably constructed close furnaces. The tar and other

products have in this country until recently been allowed to escape as

waste, but the time is approaching when these must be utilized. It will

give an idea of the industrial importance of coke when it is stated, that

about twelve million tons of our coal annually undergo conversion into

this form of fuel. Chemically considered, coke consists of carbon together

with all the mineral constituents of the coal, and small quantities of

hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. The amount of carbon varies from 85 to 97,

and the ash from 3 to 14 per cent.

The conversion of coal into coke is a very venerable branch of

manufacture, which was first carried out on a large scale in this country

about the middle of the seventeenth century. As an operation it may appear

utterly devoid of romance, but as Goethe has described his visit to the

earliest of coke-burners, this fragment of history is worth narrating.

When the great German philosophical poet was a student at Strassburg

(1771), he rode over with some friends to visit the neighbourhood of

Saarbruecken where he met an old "coal philosopher" named Stauf, who was

there carrying on the industry. This "philosophus per ignem" was manager

of some alum works, and the ruling spirit of the "burning hill" of

Duttweiler. The hill no doubt owed its designation to the coke ovens at

work upon it, and which had been in operation there for some six or seven

years before Goethe's visit, _i.e._ since 1764. The coke was wanted for

iron smelting, and even at that early period Stauf had the wisdom to

condense his volatile products, for we are told that he showed his

visitors bitumen, burning-oil, lampblack, and even a cake of sal ammoniac

resulting from his operations. Goethe has put upon record his visit to the

little haggard old coke-burner, living in his lonely cottage in the forest

(_Aus meinem Leben: Wahrheit und Dichtung_, Book X). It is probably

Stauf's ovens which are described by the French metallurgist, De Gensanne,

in his _Traite de la fonte des Mines par le feu du Charbon de Terre_,

published in Paris in 1770. After long years of coke-making, without any

regard to the value of the volatile products, we are now beginning to

consider the advisability of doing that which has long been done on the

Continent.

It is not unlikely that Bishop Watson in the last century had heard of

the attempt to recover the products from coke ovens, for he gives the

following very sound advice in his _Chemical Essays_:--

"Those who are interested in the preparation of coak would do well to

remember that every 96 ounces of coal would furnish four ounces at the

least of oil, probably six ounces might be obtained; but if we put the

product so low as five ounces from 100, and suppose a coak oven to work

off only 100 tons of coal in a year, there would be a saving of five tons

of oil, which would yield above four tons of tar; the requisite alteration

in the structure of the coak ovens, so as to make them a kind of

distilling vessels, might be made at a very trifling expense."--5th ed.,

1789, vol. ii. p. 351.

We have yet to chronicle another chapter in the history of coal philosophy

before finishing with this part of the subject. There is a branch of

manufacture carried on, especially in Scotland, which results in the

production of burning and lubricating oils, and solid paraffin, a wax-like

substance which is used for candle-making. The manufacture of candles out

of coal will perhaps be a new revelation to many readers of this book. It

must be admitted, however, that the term "coal" is here being extended to

only partially fossilized vegetation of younger geological age than true

coal, and to bituminous shales of various ages. Shale, geologically

considered, is hardened mud; it may be looked upon as clay altered by time

and pressure. Now if the mud, at the period of its deposition, was much

mixed up with vegetable matter, we should have in course of time a mixture

of more or less carbonized woody fibre with mineral matter, and this would

be called a carbonaceous or bituminous shale. Shales of this kind often

contain as much as 80 to 90 per cent. of mineral matter, and seldom more

than 20 per cent. of volatile matter, _i.e._ the portion lost on ignition,

and consisting chiefly of the carbonaceous constituents.

The story of the shale-oil industry is soon told. About the year 1847 oil

was "struck" in a coal mine at Alfreton in Derbyshire, and in the hands of

Mr. James Young this supply furnished the market with burning-oil for

nearly three years. Then the spring became exhausted, and Mr. Young and

his associates had to look out for another source of oil. Be it remembered

that this happened some nine years before the utilization of the great

American petroleum deposits. Many kinds of vegetable matter were submitted

to destructive distillation before a substance was found which could be

profitably worked, but at length Mr. Young tried a kind of cannel coal

which had about that time been introduced for gas making. This substance

was called Boghead gas coal or Torbane Hill mineral, from the place where

it occurred, which is at Bathgate in Linlithgow. This mineral was found to

yield a large amount of paraffin oil and solid paraffin on destructive

distillation, and from that time (1850) to this, the industry has been

carried on at Bathgate and other parts of Scotland, where similar

carbonaceous deposits occur.

It may seem a matter of unimportance at the present time whether this

Torbane Hill mineral is a true coal or not. About forty years ago,

however, the decision of this question involved a costly law-suit in

Edinburgh. The proprietor of the estate had granted a lease to a firm,

conveying to the latter the right to work coal, limestone, ironstone, and

certain other minerals found thereon, but excluding copper and all other

minerals not mentioned in the contract. The lessees then found that this

particular carbonaceous mineral was of very great value, both on account

of the high quality of the gas, and afterwards on account of the paraffin

which it furnished by Young's process of distillation. Thereupon the

lessor brought an action against the lessees, claiming L10,000 damages, on

the ground that the latter had broken the contract by removing a mineral

which was not coal. Experts gave evidence on both sides; some declared in

favour of the substance being coal, others said it was a bituminous shale,

while others called it bituminated clay, or refused to give it a name at

all. Judgment was finally given for the defendants, so that in the eye of

the law the mineral was considered a true coal. As a matter of fact, it is

impossible to draw a hard and fast line between coal and bituminous shale,

as the one is connected with the other by a series of intermediate

minerals, and the Torbane Hill mineral happens to form one of the links.

It contains about 69 per cent. of volatile matter, and leaves 31 per cent.

of residue, consisting of 12 parts of carbon and 19 of ash.

The manufacture started by Young has developed into an important industry,

in spite of the fact that the original Torbane Hill coal has become

exhausted, and that enormous natural deposits of petroleum are worked in

America, Russia, and elsewhere. There are now some fifteen companies at

work in Scotland, representing an aggregate capital of about two and a

half million pounds sterling. Bituminous shales of different kinds are

distilled at a low red heat in iron retorts, and from the volatile

portions there are separated those valuable products which have already

been alluded to, viz. burning and lubricating oils, solvent mineral oil,

paraffin wax for candles, and ammonia. We may fairly claim these as coal

products, although the shales used contain much mineral matter, the carbon

averaging about 20 per cent., the hydrogen three per cent., the nitrogen

0.7, and the ash about 67 per cent. The shales worked are approximately of

the same age as true coal, _i.e._ Carboniferous. The Scotch companies are

distilling about two million tons of shale per annum, this quantity

producing about sixty million gallons of crude oil, and giving employment

to over 10,000 hands.

It is not the province of the present work to enter into the chemical

nature of the products of destructive distillation in any greater detail

than is necessary to enable the general reader to know something of the

recent discoveries in the utilization of these products. We shall,

however, have occasion later on to make ourselves acquainted with the

names of some of the more important raw materials which are derived from

this source, and certain preliminary explanations are indispensable. In

the first place then, let us start from the fact that coal--including

carbonaceous shale and lignite--when heated in a closed vessel gives gas,

tar, coke, and a watery liquor. A clear understanding must be arrived at

concerning the manner in which these products arise.

There is a widely-spread notion that the substances derived from coal and

utilized for industrial purposes are present in the mineral itself, and

that the art of the chemist has been exercised in separating the said

substances by various processes. This idea must be at once dispelled. It

is true that there is a small quantity of water and a certain amount of

gas already present in most coals, but these are quite insignificant as

compared with the total yield of gas and watery liquor. So also with

respect to the tar; it is possible that in some highly bituminous minerals

we might dissolve out a small quantity of tarry matter by the use of

appropriate solvents, but in the coals mostly used for gas-making not a

trace of tar exists ready formed, and still less can it be said that the

coal contains coke. All these products are formed _by the chemical

decomposition of the coal_ under the influence of heat, and their nature

and quantity can be made to vary within certain limits by modifying the

temperature of distillation.

Having once realized this principle with respect to coal itself, it is

easy to extend it to the products of its destructive distillation. The

tar, for instance, is a complicated mixture of various substances, among

which hydrocarbons--_i.e._ compounds of carbon with hydrogen--largely

predominate. The different components of coal-tar can be separated by

processes which we shall have to consider subsequently. Of the compounds

thus isolated some few are immediately applicable for industrial purposes,

but the majority only form the raw materials for the manufacture of other

products, such as colouring-matters and medicines. Now these

colouring-matters and other finished products no more exist in the tar

than the latter exists in the coal. They are produced from the

hydrocarbons, &c., present in the tar _by chemical processes_, and bear

much about the same relationship to their parent substances that a

steam-engine bears to the iron ore out of which its metallic parts are

primarily constructed. Just as the mechanical skill of the engineer

enables him to construct an engine out of the raw material iron, which is

extracted from its ore, and converted into steel by chemical processes, so

the skill of the chemist enables him to build up complex

colouring-matters, &c., out of the raw materials furnished by tar, which

is obtained from coal by chemical decomposition.

The illuminating gas which is obtained from coal by destructive

distillation consists chiefly of hydrogen and gaseous hydrocarbons, the

most abundant of the latter being marsh gas. There are also present in

smaller quantities the two oxides of carbon, the monoxide and the dioxide,

which are gaseous at ordinary temperatures, together with other

impurities. Coal-gas is burnt just as it is delivered from the mains--it

is not at present utilized as a source of raw material in the sense that

the tar is thus made use of. In some cases gas is used as fuel, as in

gas-stoves and gas-engines, and in the so-called "gas-producers," in which

the coal, instead of being used as a direct source of heat, is partially

burnt in suitable furnaces, and the combustible gas thus arising,

consisting chiefly of carbon monoxide, is conveyed to the place where it

undergoes complete combustion, and is thus utilized as a source of heat.

Summing up the uses of coal thus far considered, we see that this mineral

is being consumed as fuel, for the production of coke, for the manufacture

of gas, and in many other ways. Lavishly as Nature has provided us with

this source of power and wealth, the idea naturally suggests itself

whether we are not drawing too liberally upon our capital. The question of

coal supply crops up from time to time, and the public mind is

periodically agitated about the prospects of its continuance. How long we

have been draining our coal resources it is difficult to ascertain. There

is some evidence that coal-mining was carried on during the Roman

occupation. In the reign of Richard I. there is distinct evidence of coal

having been dug in the diocese of Durham. The oldest charters take us back

to the early part of the thirteenth century for Scotland, and to the year

1239 for England, when King Henry III. granted a right of sale to the

townsmen of Newcastle. With respect to the metropolis, Bishop Watson, on

the authority of Anderson's _History of Commerce_, states that coal was

introduced as fuel at the beginning of the fourteenth century. In these

early days, when it was brought from the north by ships, it was known as

"sea-coal":--

"Go; and we'll have a posset for 't soon at night, in faith, at the

latter end of a sea-coal fire."--_Merry Wives of Windsor_, Act I.,

Sc. iv.

That the fuel was received at first with disfavour appears from the fact

that in the reign of Edward I. the nobility and gentry made a complaint to

the king objecting to its use, on the ground of its being a public

nuisance. By the middle of the seventeenth century the use of coal was

becoming more general in London, chiefly owing to the scarcity of wood;

and its effects upon the atmosphere of the town will be inferred from a

proclamation issued in the reign of Elizabeth, prohibiting its use during

the sitting of Parliament, for fear of injuring the health of the knights

of the shire. About 1649 the citizens again petitioned Parliament against

the use of this fuel on account of the stench; and about the beginning of

that century "the nice dames of London would not come into any house or

roome when sea-coales were burned, nor willingly eat of meat that was

either sod or roasted with sea-coale fire" (_Stow's Annals_).

For many centuries therefore we have been drawing upon our coal supplies,

and using up the mineral at an increasing rate. According to a recent

estimate by Professor Hull, from the beginning of the present century to

1875 the output has been more than doubled for each successive quarter

century. The actual amount of coal raised in the United Kingdom between

1882 and the present time averages annually about 170 million tons,

corresponding in money value to about L45,000,000 per annum. In 1860 the

amount of coal raised in Great Britain was a little more than 80 million

tons, and Professor Hull estimated that at that rate of consumption our

supplies of workable coal would hold out for a thousand years. Since then

the available stock has been diminished by some 3,650 million tons, and

even this deduction, we are told on the same authority, has not materially

affected our total supply. The possibility of a coal famine need,

therefore, cause no immediate anxiety; but we cannot "eat our loaf and

have it too," and sooner or later the continuous drain upon our coal

resources must make itself felt. The first effect will probably be an

increase in price owing to the greater depth at which the coal will have

to be worked. The whole question of our coal supply has, however,

recently assumed a new aspect by the discovery (February 1890) of coal at

a depth of 1,160 feet at Dover. To quote the words of Mr. W. Whitaker--"It

may be indeed that the coal supply of the future will be largely derived

from the South-East of England, and some day it may happen, from the

exhaustion of our northern coal-fields, that we in the south may be able

successfully to perform a task now proverbially unprofitable--_we may

carry coal to Newcastle_."

The coal-fields of Great Britain and Ireland occupy, in round numbers, an

area of 11,860 square miles, or about one-tenth of the whole area of the

land surface of the country. Within this area, and down to a depth of

4,000 feet, lie the main deposits of our available wealth. Some idea of

the amount of coal underlying this area will be gathered from the table[2]

on the next page.

This supply, amounting to over 90,000 million tons, refers to the exposed

coal-fields and to workable seams, _i.e._ those above one foot in

thickness. But in addition to this, we have a large amount of coal at

workable depths under formations of later geological age than the

Carboniferous, such as the Permian formation of northern and central

England. Adding the estimated quantity of coal from this source to that

contained in the exposed coal-fields as given above, we arrive at the

total available supply. This is estimated to be about 146,454 million

tons. To this we may one day have to add the coal under the south-eastern

part of England.

Amount of coal in millions of

tons to depths not exceeding

Coal Fields of-- 4,000 feet.

South Wales 32,456

Forest of Dean 265

Bristol 4,219

Warwickshire 459

S. Staffordshire, Shropshire, Forest of Wyre and Clee Hills 1,906

Leicestershire 837

North Wales 2,005

Anglesey 5

N. Staffordshire 3,825

Lancashire and Cheshire 5,546

Yorkshire, Derbyshire, and Northumberland 18,172

Black Burton 71

Northumberland and Durham 10,037

Cumberland 405

Scotland 9,844

Ireland 156

It is important to bear in mind, that out of the 170 million tons of coal

now being raised annually we only use a small proportion, viz. from 5 to

6 per cent. for gas-making. The largest amount (33 per cent.) is used for

iron-smelting,[3] and about 15 per cent. is exported; the remainder is

consumed in factories, dwelling-houses, for locomotion, and in the smaller

industries.

The enormous advancement which has taken place of late years in the

industrial applications of electricity has given rise to the belief that

coal-gas will in time become superseded as an illuminating agent, and that

the supply of tar may in consequence fall off. So far, however, the

introduction of electric-lighting has had no appreciable effect upon the

consumption of gas, and even when the time of general electric-lighting

arrives there will arise as a consequence an increased demand for gas as a

fuel in gas engines. Moreover, the use of gas for heating and cooking

purposes is likely to go on increasing. Nor must it be forgotten that the

quantity of tar produced in gas-works is now greater than is actually

required by the colour-manufacturer, and much of this by-product is burnt

as fuel, so that if the manufacture of gas were to suffer to any

considerable extent there would still be tar enough to meet our

requirements at the present rate of consumption of the tar-products. Then

again, the value of the tar, coke, and ammoniacal liquor is of such a

proportion as compared with the cost of the raw material, coal, that there

is a good margin for lowering the price of gas when the competition

between the latter and electricity actually comes about. It will not then

be only a struggle between the two illuminants, but it will be a question

of electricity _versus_ gas, _plus_ tar and ammonia.

While the electrician is pushing forward with rapid strides, the chemist

is also moving onwards, and every year witnesses the discovery of new tar

products, or the utilization of constituents which were formerly of little

or no value. Thus if the cost of generating and distributing electricity

is being lowered, on the other hand the value of coal tar is likely to go

on advancing, and it would be rash to predict which will come out

triumphant in the end. But even if electricity were to gain the day it

would be worth while to distil coal at the pit's mouth for the sake of the

by-products, and there is, moreover, the tar from the coke ovens to fall

back upon--a source which even before the use of coal-gas the wise Bishop

of Llandaff advised us not to neglect.

Coal, and What We Get from It · 第 1 / 3 章