NOTE 4.

This however was not Twyford, according to an anonymous pamphleteer

of the times but a Catholic seminary in Devonshire Street that is,

in the Bloomsbury district of London, and the same author asserts,

that the scene of his disgrace as indeed seems probable beforehand,

was not the first but the last of his arenas as a schoolboy Which

indeed was first, and which last, is very unimportant; but with a

view to another point, which is not without interest, namely, as to

the motive of Pope for so bitter a lampoon as we must suppose it to

have been, as well as with regard to the topics which he used to

season it, this anonymous letter throws the only light which has

been offered; and strange it is, that no biographer of Pope should

have hunted upon the traces indicated by him. Any solution of

Pope's virulence, and of the master's bitter retaliation, even

_as_ a solution, is so far entitled to attention; apart from

which the mere straightforwardness of this man's story, and its

minute circumstantiality, weigh greatly in its favor. To our

thinking, he unfolds the whole affair in the simple explanation,

nowhere else to be found, that the master of the school, the mean

avenger of a childish insult by a bestial punishment, was a Mr.

Bromley, one of James II.'s Popish apostates; whilst the particular

statements which he makes with respect to himself and the young

Duke of Norfolk of 1700, as two schoolfellows of Pope at that time

and place, together with his voluntary promise to come forward in

person, and verify his account if it should happen to be

challenged,--are all, we repeat, so many presumptions in favor of

his veracity. "Mr. Alexander Pope," says he, "before he had been

four months at this school, or was able to construe Tully's

Offices, employed his muse in satirizing his master. It was a libel

of at least one hundred verses, which (a fellow-student having

given information of it) was found in his pocket; and the young

satirist was soundly whipped, and kept a prisoner to his room for

seven days; whereupon his father fetched him away, and I have been

told he never went to school more." This Bromley, it has been

ascertained, was the son of a country gentleman in Worcestershire,

and must have had considerable prospects at one time, since it

appears that he had been a gentleman-commoner at Christ's Church,

Oxford. There is an error in the punctuation of the letter we have

just quoted, which affects the sense in a way very important to the

question before us. Bromley is described as "one of King James's

converts in Oxford, some years _after_ that prince's

abdication;" but, if this were really so, he must have been a

conscientious convert. The latter clause should be connected with

what follows:" _Some years after that prince's abdication he kept

a little seminary_; "that is, when his mercenary views in

quitting his religion were effectually defeated, when the Boyne had

sealed his despair, he humbled himself into a petty schoolmaster.

These facts are interesting, because they suggest at once the

motive for the merciless punishment inflicted upon Pope. His own

father was a Papist like Bromley, but a sincere and honest Papist,

who had borne double taxes, legal stigmas, and public hatred for

conscience' sake. His contempt was habitually pointed at those who

tampered with religion for interested purposes. His son inherited

these upright feelings. And we may easily guess what would be the

bitter sting of any satire he would write on Bromley. Such a topic

was too true to be forgiven, and too keenly barbed by Bromley's

conscience. By the way, this writer, like ourselves, reads in this

juvenile adventure a prefiguration of Pope's satirical destiny.

Biographical Essays · 第 36 / 53 题