NOTE 11.

Let not the reader impute to us the gross anachronism of making an

estimate for Shakspeare's days in a coin which did not exist until

a century, within a couple of years, after Shakspeare's birth, and

did not settle to the value of twenty-one shillings until a century

after his death. The nerve of such an anachronism would lie in

putting the estimate into a mouth of that age. And this is

precisely the blunder into which the foolish forger of Vortigern,

&c., has fallen. He does not indeed directly mention guineas; but

indirectly and virtually he does, by repeatedly giving us accounts

imputed to Shakspearian contemporaries, in which the sum total

amounts to 5L 5s.; or to 26L 5s.; or, again, to 17L 17s. 6d. A man

is careful to subscribe 14L 14s. and so forth. But how could such

amounts have arisen unless under a secret reference to guineas,

which were not in existence until Charles II.'s reign; and,

moreover, to guineas at their final settlement by law into

twenty-one shillings each, which did not take place until George I.

's reign.

Biographical Essays · 第 16 / 53 题