CHAPTER II.

A LIFE'S MEMORIES.

Long, long before John Forster wrote to recommend everyone to write

memoirs of himself it had become the fashion to do so. "That celebrated

orator," writes Dr. Edmund Calamy, one of the most learned of our

Nonconformist divines, "Caius Cornelius Tacitus, in the beginning of his

account of the life of his father-in-law, Julius Agricola (who was the

General of Domitian, the Emperor, here in Britain, and the first who made

the Roman part of Britain a Praesidial province), excuses this practice

from carrying in it anything of arrogance." This excellent example was

followed by Julius Caesar, Marcus Antoninus, many emperors who kept

diaries, Flavius Josephus, St. Gregory of Nazianzen, St. Augustine, to

say nothing of Abraham Schultetus, the celebrated professor at

Heidelberg; of the learned Fuetius; of Basompierre, the celebrated

marshal of France; of the ever-amusing and garrulous Montaigne; or of our

own Richard Baxter, or of Edmund Calamy himself. The fact is, it has

ever been the fashion with men who have handled the pen freely to write

more or less about themselves and the times in which they lived, and

there is no pleasanter reading than such biographical recollections; and

really it matters little whether on the world's stage the actor acted

high tragedy or low comedy so that he writes truthfully as far as he can

about himself and his times. If old Montaigne is to be believed there is

nothing like writing about oneself. "I dare," he writes, "not only speak

of myself, but of myself alone," and never man handled better the very

satisfactory theme. If I follow in the steps of my betters I can do no

harm, and I may do good if I can show how the England of to-day is

changed for the better since I first began to observe that working men

and women are better off, that our middle and upper classes have clearer

views of duty and responsibility, that we are the better for the

political and social and religious reforms that have been achieved of

late, that, in fact,

. . . through the ages one increasing purpose runs,

And the thoughts of men are widened with the process of the suns.

The one great complaint I have to make with respect to my father and

mother, to whom I owe so much, and whose memory I shall ever revere, was

that they brought me into the world forty or fifty years too soon. In

1820, when I first saw the light of day, England was in a very poor way.

It was what the late Earl of Derby used to call the pre-scientific era.

Gross darkness covered the land. The excitement of war was over, and the

lavish outlay it occasioned being stopped, life was stagnant, farmers and

manufacturers alike were at low-water mark, and the social and religious

and political reforms required by the times were as yet undreamed of.

However, one good thing my parents did for me. They lived in a country

village in the extreme east of Suffolk, not far from the sea, where I

could lead a natural life, where I could grow healthy, if not wise, and

be familiar with all the impulses which spring up in the heart under the

influences of rural life. "Boyhood in the country," writes William

Howitt in his autobiography--"Paradise of opening existence! Up to the

age of ten this life was all my own." And thus it was with me.

Existence was a pleasure, and the weather, I believe, was better then

than it is now. We had summer in summer time. We had fine weather when

harvest commenced, and to spend a day at one of the neighbouring farmers

riding the fore horse was a delight which thrilled me with joy; and

winter, with its sliding and snowballing, with its clear skies and its

glittering snows, rendering the landscape lovelier than ever, made me

forget the inevitable chilblains, which was the price we had to pay for

all its glories and its charms.

Our little village was situated on the high road between London and Great

Yarmouth, along which rolled twice a day the London and Yarmouth Royal

Mail, drawn by four horses, and driven by a fat man in red, whom we raw

village lads regarded as a very superior person indeed. Behind sat the

guard, also in red, with a horn, which he blew lustily when occasion

required. There was a time, but that was much later, when a day coach

was put on, and, as it changed horses at our village inn, one of our

chief delights was to see the tired, heated, smoking horses taken out,

and their places filled by a new set, much given to kicking and plunging

at starting, to the immense delight of the juvenile spectators. Even the

passengers I regarded with awe. In fourteen hours would they not be in

London where the King lived--where were the Houses of Parliament, the

Bank and the Tower and the soldiers? What would I not have given to be

on that roof urging on, under the midnight stars, my wild career! Now

and then a passenger would be dropped in our little village. What a nine

days' wonder he was, especially if he were a Cockney and talked in the

language of Cockaigne--if he had heard the Iron Duke, or seen royalty

from afar. Nonconformity flourished in the village in spite of the fact

that the neighbouring baronet, at the gates of whose park the village may

be said to have commenced, was Sir Thomas Gooch--(Guche was the way the

villagers pronounced his dread name)--for was he not a county magistrate,

who could consign people to Beccles Gaol, some eight miles off, and one

of the M.P.'s for the county, and did not he and his lady sternly set

their faces against Dissent? If now and then there were coals and

blankets to be distributed--and very little was done in that way, charity

had not become fashionable then--you may be sure that no Dissenter,

however needy and deserving, came in for a share.

The churches round were mostly filled by the baronet's relatives, who

came into possession of the family livings as a matter of course, and

took little thought for the souls of their parishioners. In fact, very

few people did go to church. In our chapel, of which my father was the

minister for nearly forty years, we had a good congregation, especially

of an afternoon, when the farmers with their families, in carts or gigs,

put in an appearance. One of the ejected had been the founder of

Nonconformity in our village, and its traditions were all of the most

honourable character. A wealthy family had lived in the hall, which Sir

Thomas Gooch had bought and pulled down, one of whom had been M.P. for

the county in Cromwell's time, and had left a small endowment--besides,

there was a house for the minister--to perpetuate the cause, and it was

something amidst the Boeotian darkness all round to have a man of

superior intellect, of a fair amount of learning, of unspotted life, of

devoted piety, such as the old Nonconformist ministers were, ever seeking

to lead the people upward and onward; while the neighbouring gentry and

all the parsons round, I am sorry to say, set the people a very bad

example. In our time we have changed all that, and the Church clergy are

as zealous to do good as the clergy of any other denomination. But that

things have altered so much for the better, I hold is mainly due to the

great progress made all over the land by Dissent, which woke up the

Church from the state of sloth and luxury and lethargy which had

jeopardised its very existence. Really, at the time of which I write and

in the particular locality to which I refer, decent godly people were

obliged to forsake the Parish Church, and to seek in the neighbouring

conventicle the aids requisite to a religious life. At the same time,

there was little collision between Church and Dissent. The latter had

its own sphere, supporting, in addition to its local work, the Bible

Society, the Tract Society, the London Missionary Society, and the

Anti-Slavery Society. It had also its Sunday-school, very much inferior

to what they are now; and, if possible, secured a day school on the

British and Foreign plan. Dissenters paid Church rates, which the

wealthy Churchmen were not ashamed to collect. They gave the parson his

tithes without a murmur, and politically they were all on the side of the

Whigs, to whom they were indebted for the repeal of the Test and

Corporation Acts--barbarous laws--which had ostracised intelligent and

conscientious Dissenters from all parochial and municipal and

Parliamentary life. When I was a boy no one could be a parish constable

without going through the hideous farce of taking the Sacrament at his

Parish Church. It was the Dissenters who created the public opinion

which enabled Sir Robert Peel and the Iron Duke to grant Roman Catholic

emancipation. It was they who carried reform and abolished rotten

boroughs, and gave Manchester and Sheffield and Birmingham the

representatives which the Tories, and especially the parsons, would have

denied them. To be a reformer was held by the clergy and gentry to be a

rogue and rascal of the first rank. I cannot call to mind any public

action taken in support of the suffering and the poor to which the clergy

and the gentry in our village, or in any of the villages round, lent any

support whatever. As regards the great Anti-Slavery agitation, for

instance, the only meeting on the subject was held in our chapel, where a

Captain Pilkington came down from London to lecture, and touched all our

hearts as he showed the lash and the chains, and the other instruments of

torture which that cruel system sanctioned and required, and you may be

quite sure that when next day I, with boyish pride, pardonable under the

circumstances, was sent round to get signatures for a petition to

Parliament on the subject, it was not long before I got my paper filled.

Naturally the Dissenters were active in the work, for had not one of

their number--poor Smith, missionary at Demerara--been foully murdered by

Demerara magistrates and planters because he took the part of the black

slave against his white owner and tyrant? Yet I was disgusted, after

remembering the effect produced in our Suffolk village by the captain's

eloquence, to read thirty years after in Sir George Stephens's

"Anti-Slavery Recollections," that "Pilkington was a pleasing lecturer,

and won over many by his amiable manners, but that he wanted power, and

resigned the duty in about six months." In our simple village it was

enough for us that a lecturer or speaker came from London; or as the

country people called it Lunnen. That was a sufficient guarantee for us

of his talent, his respectability, and his power. Since then the scales

have fallen even from the eyes of the rustic, and he no longer sees men

as trees walking. Railways have rendered the journey to London

perilously easy. Hodge, in the vain hope to better himself, has left his

village home, its clear skies, its bracing air, its healthy toil, its

simple hours, and gone to live in the crowded slums. It may be that he

earns better wages, but you may buy gold too dear. A healthy rustic is

far happier in his village. It is there he should strive to live, rather

than in the town; and a time may come when English legislators will have

wisdom enough to do something to plant the people on the land, rather

than compel them to come to town, to be poisoned by its bad air, its

dangerous companionship, and its evil ways.

As regards intelligence, we were in a poor way. On Saturdays _The

Suffolk Chronicle_ appeared, much to the delight of the Radicals, while

the Tories were cheered by _The Ipswich Journal_. At a later time _The

Patriot_ came to our house, and we got an idea of what was going on in

the religious and Dissenting world. Foster's Essays were to be seen on

many shelves, and later on the literary and religious speculations of

Isaac Taylor, of Ongar, and Dick's writings had also a wonderful sale. I

fancy no one cares much now for any of the writers I have named. Such is

fame!

As a boy it seemed to me I had too much of the Assembly's Catechism and

Virgil, to whose poetic beauties I was somewhat blind. I resolved to run

away, as I fancied there was something better and brighter than village

life. Religion was not attractive to me. Sunday was irksome. The land

was barren, from Dan to Beersheba. I longed for the conflict and

excitement and life of the distant town, and I ran away unconscious of

the pain I should inflict on parents I dearly loved. Oh, that running

away! If I live--and there is little chance of that--to the age of

Methuselah I shall never forget it! It took place in the early morn of a

long summer's day. The whole scene rises distinctly before me. I see

myself giving a note to my sister for father and mother when they came

down to breakfast, I see myself casting an eye to the bedroom window to

see if there was any chance of their being up and so stopping the

enterprise on which I had set my mind. Happily, as I thought, the blinds

were down and there was nothing to forbid my opening the garden gate and

finding myself on the London road. I was anxious to be off and yet loth

to leave. I had a small parcel under my arm, consisting of very small

belongings; and I was free of Latin and the Assembly Catechism, free as

the air--my own master. All the world was hushed in slumber. There was

no one to stop me or bid me return to the roof where I had been happy,

and to the parents whom I was to return to, to love more than I had ever

done before, and whom it then saddened me to think that I might never see

again. Not a soul was in the street, and the few shops which adorned it

were shut up--cottagers and shopkeepers, they were all in the arms of

Morpheus. I hastened on, not wishing to be seen by any one; but there

was no fear of that, only cows, horses at grass, and pigs and hens and

birds were conscious of my flight, and they regarded me with the

indifference with which a Hottentot would view an ape. In my path was a

hill on which I stayed awhile to take a last look at the deserted

village. The white smoke was then curling up from the chimneys and the

common round of daily life was about to begin. How peaceful it all

seemed. What a contrast to my beating heart! There was not one of those

cottages behind into which I had not been with my father as he visited

the poor and the afflicted--not a lane or street along which I had not

trundled my hoop with boyish glee--not a meadow into which I had not gone

in search of buttercups and cowslips and primroses or bird's nests. I

only met one man I knew, the miller, as he came from the mill where he

had been at work all night, and of him I stood somewhat in awe, for once

when the mill was being robbed he had sat up alone in darkness in the

mill till the robbers came in, when he looked, through a hole in the

upper floor, as they were at their wicked work below, and had thus

identified them; and I had seen them in a cart on their way to Beccles

gaol. Perhaps, thought I, he will stop me and ask me what I am about;

but he did nothing of the kind, and henceforth the way was clear for me

to London, where I was to fight the battle of life. Did I not write

poetry, and did not I know ladies who were paid a guinea a page for

writing for the Annuals, and could not I do the same? And thus thinking

I walked three miles till I came to a small beershop, where I had a

biscuit and a glass of beer. The road from thence was new to me, and how

I revelled in the stateliness of the trees as I passed a nobleman's (Earl

Stradbrooke's) mansion and park. In another hour or so I found myself at

Yoxford, then and still known as the Garden of Suffolk. There lived a

Mr. Bird, a Suffolk poet of some note in his day. On him I called. He

gave me a cordial welcome, kept me to dinner, and set me to play with his

children. Alas! Yoxford was to me what Capua was to Hannibal--I got no

further; in fact, my father traced me to the house, and I had nothing for

it but to abandon my London expedition and return home. I don't think I

was very sorry that my heroic enterprise had thus miscarried. What

annoyed me most was that I was sent home in an open cart, and as we got

into the street all the women came to their doors to see Master James

brought back. I did not like being thus paraded as a show. I found my

way to the little attic in which I slept, not quite so much of a hero as

I had felt myself in the early morn.

It was a stirring time. The nation was being stirred, as it was never

before or since, with the struggle for Reform. The excitement reached us

in our out-of-the-way village. We were all Whigs, all bursting with

hope. Yet some of the respectable people who feared Sir Thomas Gooch

were rather alarmed by my father's determination to vote against him--the

sitting Member--and to support the Liberal candidate. People do not read

Parliamentary debates now. They did then, and not a line was skipped. I

was a Radical. An old grocer in the village had lent me Hone's "House

that Jack Built," and similar pamphlets, all illustrated by Cruikshank.

My eyes were opened, and I had but a poor opinion of royalty and the Tory

Ministers and the place men and parasites and other creeping vermin that

infest courts. It is impossible to believe anything more rotten than

that glorious Constitution which the Tories told us was the palladium of

our liberties, the glory of our country, and the envy of surrounding

nations. The Ministry for the time being existed by bribery and

corruption. The M.P. bought his seat and sold his vote; the free and

independent electors did the same. The boroughs were almost entirely

rotten and for sale in consequence of the complicated state of voting in

them, and especially in those incorporated by charter. In one borough

the right was acquired by birth, in another by servitude, in another by

purchase, in a fourth by gift, in a fifth by marriage. In some these

rights were exercised by residents, in others by non-residents; in one

place by the mayor or bailiff and twelve aldermen only, as at Buckingham,

Malmesbury, &c.; in another by eight aldermen or ten or twelve burgesses,

as at Bath, Andover, Tiverton, Banbury, &c.; in another by a small number

of burgesses--three or four or five, as at Rye, Winchelsea, Romney, &c.

As to what was called long ago tenure in boroughs there was no end to its

absurdity. At Midhurst the right was in the possession of a hundred

stones erected in an open field; at Old Sarum it was in the remaining

part of the possession of a demolished castle; at Westbury in a long

wall. In many other places it was in the possession of half-a-score or a

dozen old thatched cottages, the conveyances to which were made on the

morning of election to a few trusty friends or dependents, who held a

farcical election, and then returned them to the proprietor as soon as

the business was finished. In the little borough of Aldeburgh, where

Crabbe was born, the number of electors was eighty, all the property of a

private individual; at Dunwich, a little further on the coast, the number

of voters was twelve; at Bury St. Edmunds the number of voters was

thirty-seven; another little insignificant village on the same coast was

Orford, where the right of election was in a corporation of twenty

individuals, composed of the family and dependents of the Marquis of

Hertford. No wonder the popular fury swept away the rotten boroughs, and

no wonder that the long struggle for reform ended in the triumph, not so

much of the people, as the middle-class.

Christopher Crayon's Recollections The Life and Times of the late James Ewing Ritchie as told by himself · 第 2 / 17 章