Act ii. sc. 3.—

“_Just._ I mean a child of the horn-thumb, a babe _of booty_, boy, a

cut purse.”

Does not this confirm, what the passage itself cannot but suggest, the

propriety of substituting “booty” for “beauty” in Falstaff’s speech,

_Henry IV._ part i. act i. sc. 2. “Let not us, &c.?”

It is not often that old Ben condescends to imitate a modern author; but

Master Dan. Knockhum Jordan, and his vapours are manifest reflexes of Nym

and Pistol.

_Ib._ sc. 5.—

“_Quarl._ She’ll make excellent geer for the coachmakers here in

Smithfield, to anoint wheels and axletrees with.”

Good! but yet it falls short of the speech of a Mr. Johnes, M.P., in the

Common Council, on the invasion intended by Buonaparte:—“Houses

plundered—then burnt;—sons conscribed—wives and daughters ravished,” &c.,

&c.—“But as for you, you luxurious Aldermen! with your fat will he grease

the wheels of his triumphant chariot!”

_Ib._ sc. 6.—

“_Cok._ Avoid in your satin doublet, Numps.”

This reminds me of Shakespeare’s “Aroint thee, witch!” I find in several

books of that age the words _aloigne_ and _eloigne_—that is,—“keep your

distance!” or “off with you!” Perhaps “aroint” was a corruption of

“aloigne” by the vulgar. The common etymology from _ronger_ to gnaw seems

unsatisfactory.

Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher · 第 127 / 186 题