Act i.—

“_Arruntius._ The name Tiberius,

I hope, will keep, howe’er he hath foregone

The dignity and power.

_Silius._ Sure, while he lives.

_Arr._ And dead, it comes to Drusus. Should he fail,

To the brave issue of Germanicus;

And they are three: too many (ha?) for him

To have a plot upon?

_Sil._ I do not know

The heart of his designs; but, sure, their face

Looks farther than the present.

_Arr._ By the gods,

If I could guess he had but such a thought,

My sword should cleave him down,” &c.

The anachronic mixture in this Arruntius of the Roman republican, to whom

Tiberius must have appeared as much a tyrant as Sejanus, with his

James-and-Charles-the-First zeal for legitimacy of descent in this

passage, is amusing. Of our great names Milton was, I think, the first who

could properly be called a republican. My recollections of Buchanan’s

works are too faint to enable me to judge whether the historian is not a

fair exception.

Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher · 第 116 / 186 题