Act ii. sc. 3. Sir Andrew’s speech:—

An explanatory note on _Pigrogromitus_ would have been more acceptable

than Theobald’s grand discovery that “lemon” ought to be “leman.”

_Ib._ Sir Toby’s speech (Warburton’s note on the Peripatetic philosophy):—

“Shall we rouse the night-owl in a catch, that will draw three

“souls out of one weaver?”

O genuine, and inimitable (at least I hope so) Warburton! This note of

thine, if but one in five millions, would be half a one too much.

_Ib._ sc. 4.—

“_Duke._ My life upon’t, young though thou art, thine eye

Hath stay’d upon some favour that it loves;

Hath it not, boy?

_Vio._ A little, by your favour.

_Duke._ What kind of woman is’t?”

And yet Viola was to have been presented to Orsino as a eunuch!—Act i. sc.

2. Viola’s speech. Either she forgot this, or else she had altered her

plan.

_Ib._—

“_Vio._ A blank, my lord: she never told her love!—

But let concealment,” &c.

After the first line (of which the last five words should be spoken with,

and drop down in, a deep sigh), the actress ought to make a pause; and

then start afresh, from the activity of thought, born of suppressed

feelings, and which thought had accumulated during the brief interval, as

vital heat under the skin during a dip in cold water.

_Ib._ sc. 5.—

“_Fabian._ Though our silence be drawn from us by _cars_, yet

peace.”

Perhaps, “cables.”

Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher · 第 34 / 186 题