PUBLICATION.

On the question of publication of the results of our labors it is

perhaps premature to dwell at length. Each of the experiment stations

is publishing its own bulletins and reports quite independently of the

others, but after a uniform plan recommended by the association with

which we meet here; and with but one exception that has come to my

notice, another important recommendation of the same association--that

these publications shall be void of all personal matter--has been kept

in mind. The National Bureau of Experiment Stations at Washington is

doing what it can with the means at command to further the general

work by issuing the Experiment Station Record, devoted chiefly to

digests of the State station bulletins. There is a serious question in

my mind as to the utility of State digests by the national department

of results already published extensively by the different States and

distributed under government frank to all similar institutions and to

whomsoever is interested enough to ask for them.

Such digests may or may not be intelligently made, and, even under the

most favorable circumstances, will hardly serve any other purpose than

helping to the reference to the original articles, and this could

undoubtedly be done more satisfactorily to the stations and to the

people at large by general and classified indices to all the State

documents, made as full as possible and issued at stated intervals.

Only a small proportion of the bulletins have been so far noticed by

digest in this record, with no particular rule, so far as I can see,

in the selection. In point of fact, those will be most apt to be

noticed whose authors can find time to themselves send or make for the

purpose their own abstracts. This is, perhaps, inevitable under

present arrangements. Complete and satisfactory digests of all, if

intelligent and critical, imply a far greater force than is at present

at Prof. Atwater's command.

Under these circumstances, it would seem wiser to devote all the

energies of the bureau to digests of the similar literature of other

countries, which would be of immense advantage to our people and to

the different station workers. Judging from the recommendations and

resolutions of the general association, this is the view very

generally held, but except in chemistry and special industries like

that of beet sugar, very little of that kind of work has yet been

attempted.

What is true of the station publications in general is equally true of

special publications. As entomologist of the department, I have been

urged to bring together, at stated intervals, digests of the

entomological publications of the different stations. Such digests to

be of any value, however, should also be critical, and it were a

thankless task for any one to be critic or censor even of that which

needs correction or criticism. Moreover, to do this work intelligently

would require increase of the divisional force, which at present is

more advantageously employed, for, as already intimated, I should have

great doubts of the utility of these digests.

I believe, however, that the division should strive for such increase

of means as would justify the periodic publication, either

independently or as a part of the department record, of general and

classified indices to the entomological matter of the station

bulletins, and should work more and more toward giving results from

other parts of the world. This could, perhaps, best be done by titles

of subject and of author so spaced and printed on stout paper that

they could be cut and used in the ordinary card catalogue. The

recipient could cut and systematically place the titles as fast as

received.

As to the character of the matter of the entomological bulletins, it

will inevitably be influenced by the needs and demands of the people

of the respective States, and while originality should be kept in

mind, there must needs be in the earlier years of the work much

restatement of what is already well known. That some results have been

published of work which reflects no particular credit upon our calling

is a mere incident of the new positions created. Yet we may expect

marked improvement from year to year in this direction, and without

being invidious, I would cite those of Prof. Gillette's on his

spraying experiments and on the plum curculio and plum gouger, as

models of what such bulletins should be.

Although the resolution offered at our last meeting by Prof. Cook, to

the effect that purely descriptive matter should be excluded from the

station bulletins, met with no favor, but was laid on the table, by

the general association, I am in full sympathy with this position and

am strongly of the opinion that in the ordinary bulletins such purely

technical and descriptive matter should be reduced to the necessary

minimum consistent with clearness of statement and accuracy, and that

if it is desired, on the part of the station entomologists, to issue

technical and descriptive papers, a separate series of bulletins were

better instituted for this class of matter.

Finally, for results which it is desired to promptly get before the

people, the agricultural press is at our disposal, and so far as the

entomological work of the department of agriculture is concerned, the

periodical bulletin, _Insect Life_, was established for this purpose.

Its columns are open to all station workers, and I would here appeal

to the members of the association to help make it, as far as possible,

national, by sending brief notes and digests of their work as it

progresses. Hitherto we have been unable to make as much effort in

this direction as we desired, but in future it is our hope to make the

bulletin, as far as possible, a national medium through which the

results of work done in all parts of the country may quickly be put on

record and distributed, not only to all parts of our own country, but

to all parts of the world.

The rapid growth and development of the national department and the

multiplication of its divisions have necessitated special modes of

publication and rendered the annual report almost an anachronism so

far as it pretends to be what it at one time was--a pretty complete

report of the scientific and other work of the department. The

attempts which I have made through the proper authorities to get

Congress to order more pretentious monographic works in quarto volume

similar to those issued by other departments of the government have

not met with encouragement, and in this direction many of the stations

will, let us hope, be able to do better.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 787, January 31, 1891 · 第 43 / 71 题