H., P., & CO. TO M. N., APRIL 21.

"On the 16th we received a communication from Mr. Nathan Dane, which

led us to suppose he was acting as your attorney, and had charge of the

matter of reference on your behalf. We replied to his communication,

and we have heard nothing from him since."

I did not see that there was any point to any of these letters and I

did not reply to them or give myself any trouble about them. If Messrs.

Hunt, Parry, & Co., wanted further delay why had they agreed upon a

day, and what should they want of further delay? As they had frequently

had communication with Mr. Dane concerning this matter, and had

themselves spoken of him as my attorney without contradiction from me,

I did not quite see how they could have waited for the interrogatories,

to be led to any new supposition in that respect. As to their having a

lawyer, while I did not see why they should want one, I certainly had

no objection. I thought Mr. Parry had come down to Zoar on purpose

to arrange the preliminaries of the reference, and that they were

sufficiently arranged at that time. But I apprehended no trouble on

that score, and took no thought about it.

[Illustration]

A Battle of the Books, recorded by an unknown writer for the use of authors and publishers To the first for doctrine, to the second for reproof, to both for correction and for instruction in righteousness · 第 102 / 129 题