CHAPTER I

LORD LYONS

VOLUME I

[Illustration: _Lord Lyons,

from a photograph taken at Boston, U.S. in 1860._]

LORD LYONS

A RECORD OF BRITISH DIPLOMACY

BY

LORD NEWTON

IN TWO VOLUMES

VOLUME I

WITH PORTRAITS

LONDON

EDWARD ARNOLD

1913

_All rights reserved_

PREFACE

It was the practice of the late Lord Lyons to preserve carefully the

whole of his correspondence, whether official, semi-official, or

private, and upon his death this accumulation of papers passed into the

possession of his nephew, the present Duke of Norfolk.

I have been able to draw to some extent upon my own diary and

recollections of the five years (1881-1886) during which I served as a

member of Lord Lyons's staff at the Paris Embassy, but that period

represents only a very small portion of his official career, and it is

from the above mentioned papers that this work has been almost entirely

compiled. All the material was placed unreservedly at my disposal, and I

desire to make full acknowledgment of this mark of confidence. I desire

also to express my gratitude to the numerous persons who have readily

given their consent to the publication of important letters in which

they possess a proprietary interest: notably to Emily Lady Ampthill,

Lord Clarendon, Lord Derby, Lady Granville, Lady Ermyntrude Malet, Lord

Rosebery, the Hon. Rollo Russell, Lord Salisbury, and Lord Sanderson.

I am indebted to Mr. J. F. Marshall and Mr. Alan Parsons for their

assistance in sifting the enormous mass of documents found at Norfolk

House, and to the Hon. Arnold Keppel for a service rendered at a

subsequent period. Finally, I have to thank Mrs. Wilfrid Ward for an

interesting contribution entitled "Lord Lyons in private life,"

containing personal details only available to a near relative.

NEWTON.

_October, 1913._

CONTENTS OF VOL. I

CHAPTER I

PAGE

EARLY LIFE

Early Life--Enters Diplomatic Service, 1839--Appointed unpaid

attaché at Athens--Unfavourable prospects--Paid attaché at

Rome, 1853--Condition of the Papal States--Life at Rome--Appointed

Secretary of Legation at Florence--Question of the

'Tavola di Stato'--Sent to Naples to deal with the case of the

_Cagliari_--Success of his mission and appointment as Minister

at Florence--Succeeds to peerage on death of his father--Appointed

Minister at Washington, 1858 1

CHAPTER II

WASHINGTON

1859-1860

Arrival at Washington--Effect produced in America by the Franco-Austrian

War--Feeling in America with regard to England--San

Juan and Mexico--Rising passions between Northern and

Southern States--Disclaimer of matrimonial intentions--Accompanies

Prince of Wales on Canadian tour--Delight of President

Buchanan at receiving a letter from Queen Victoria--Prince

of Wales's visit to the United States 12

CHAPTER III

OUTBREAK OF CIVIL WAR--THE 'TRENT' CASE

1860-1861

Crisis caused by election of President Lincoln--Mr. Seward as

Secretary of State: his threatening language--Capture of Fort

Sumter--Desirability of England and France acting in conjunction--Danger

of an attack upon Canada--Growth of ill-feeling

towards England--Effect of battle of Bull's Run--Mr. Seward

on the essential difference between American policy and that

of Foreign Nations--Seizure of a Foreign Office bag--British

Consuls and the Confederate Government--The Trent incident:

seizure of Messrs. Mason and Slidell--Lord Lyons's decision to

maintain complete reserve--H.M. Government urged to provide

for defence of Canada--Attitude of American public--Instructions

of Her Majesty's Government--Mr. Seward's reception of

the despatch--Liberation of Messrs. Mason and Slidell--Lord

Lyons's consideration acknowledged by Mr. Seward--Advantage

of occasional silence 29

CHAPTER IV

COURSE OF THE CIVIL WAR

1862-1865

Course of the Civil War--Mr. Seward's altered policy towards

England--Visit of the French Minister, M. Mercier, to the Confederate

Headquarters--Lord Lyons declines to accompany him--Rumoured intention

of France and England to mediate--Breakdown in health owing to

overwork--Failure of French attempt at intervention--Dissatisfaction in

Northern States--Indiscretion of a British Consul--Arbitrary

proceedings of American cruisers--Lord Russell and the

_Alabama_--Grievances of foreigners resident in the United

States--Liability of British subjects to military service--Method of

recruiting the Northern armies--Hardships of 'Volunteers'--The Bounty

System--Surprising proposal by Mr. Seward--Reciprocity negotiations:

Lord Lyons's objections to a Canadian representative--Difficulty of

obtaining redress for aggrieved British subjects--Lord Lyons directed

to proceed to Canada and to report on its defence--Return to

Washington--Breakdown in health--The work at the Washington

Legation--Proceeds to England--Retires temporarily from Diplomatic

service owing to ill-health 79

CHAPTER V

CONSTANTINOPLE

1865-1867

Offer and Acceptance of Constantinople Embassy--Sir Henry

Bulwer--Comparative calm at Constantinople--Arrogance of

French Ambassador, M. de Moustier--Lord Stratford de Redcliffe

on Turkey--Sultan Abdul Aziz and his passion for ironclads--The

Principalities: Prince Charles of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen

chosen as Hereditary Prince--Difficulties relating to his

Investiture--Crete: The Fortress of Belgrade--Lord Stanley on

Greece--Russian policy towards Turkey--Pro-Russian proclivities

of Napoleon III.--Projected visit of the Sultan to France and

England--Mr. Hammond's apprehensions with regard to the

Sultan--The Dragoman system at Constantinople--Appointed

Ambassador at Paris 144

CHAPTER VI

THE SECOND EMPIRE

1867-1869

Arrival at Paris--The Empress on the Roman Question--The Emperor's

desire for a Conference--Mr. Odo Russell on erroneous French impressions

with regard to the Papacy--Prince Napoleon on the probability of war

with Germany--Credulity of the Emperor of Russia--Visit of Prince

Napoleon to Germany: his impressions--Difficulties of Napoleon

III.--General uneasiness in France and depression of Emperor--Suggested

offer of throne of Spain to Duke of Edinburgh--Lord Clarendon's

conversations with the King of Prussia and Moltke--Lord Clarendon and

Napoleon III.--Lord Clarendon at the Foreign Office--Views of the Crown

Prince of Prussia--Emperor's love of Conferences--The Luxemburg Railway

affair--Apprehensions in England and Belgium of French designs--Views

of Queen Victoria and Gladstone--Confidential instructions to Lord

Lyons--Desire of Empress to visit India--Lord Lyons requested to vote

on party question in House of Lords--Formation of Constitutional

Administration under Emile Ollivier--Distrust of the Emperor 177

CHAPTER VII

SECRET PROPOSALS FOR DISARMAMENT

1870

Attempt by Lord Clarendon, at request of Count Daru, to induce

the Prussian Government to partially disarm--Emile Ollivier

on disarmament--Memorandum by Lord Clarendon communicated

to Bismarck--Objections raised by Bismarck--Count

Daru on Bismarck's arguments--Intended reduction of the

French army--Second attempt by Lord Clarendon--Bismarck's

final answer 246

CHAPTER VIII

THE FRANCO-GERMAN WAR

1870

Internal situation in France--Further military reduction sanctioned--The

Plébiscite: general uneasiness--Official satisfaction at result

of Plébiscite--Sycophantic diplomatists--Gramont appointed

Foreign Minister--Official views respecting the value of British

colonies--Accurate prophecy by Lord Clarendon--Death of Lord

Clarendon: Lord Granville Foreign Secretary--The Hohenzollern

Candidature--Explosion of Chauvinism--Lord Lyons's explanation

of the manner in which the war was forced upon the Emperor

Napoleon--Conduct of the Empress during the early stages of the

war--Fall of the Empire: Thiers and Jules Favre--Thiers's

mission--Malet's mission to Bismarck--Consent of Bismarck to receive

a representation of the Provisional Government 280

CHAPTER IX

THE GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL DEFENCE

1870-1871

Departure from Paris to join Provisional Government at Tours--Chaudordy

on cession of territory--Attempt of Gustave Flourens to overthrow the

Government at Paris--Thiers's interviews with Bismarck--Bismarck and

_Les militaires_--Gladstone on cession of territory--Denunciation

by Russia of Black Sea clauses in Treaty of Paris--Question of

Bismarck's connivance--French and German grievances against

England--Lord Lyons joins Provisional Government at Bordeaux--Difficulty

in securing a French Representation at Black Sea Conference--Revival of

French hopes at close of 1870--Bombardment of Paris--Thiers willing to

cede territory: his superiority to Jules Favre--Armistice--General

election--Thiers's conduct of the Peace Negotiations--Peace conditions

accepted--Outbreak of the Commune: Lord Lyons and other diplomatists go

to Versailles--Malet and Paschal Grousset--Murder of the Archbishop of

Paris and the hostages--Suppression of the Commune--Return to Paris.

322

LIST OF PLATES IN VOL. I

FACING PAGE

LORD LYONS _Frontispiece_

_From a photograph taken at Boston, U.S., in 1860_

WILLIAM HENRY SEWARD 32

PRINCE NAPOLEON 194

LORD LYONS

A RECORD OF BRITISH DIPLOMACY

CHAPTER I

EARLY LIFE

Born in 1817, Richard Bickerton Pemell Lyons, second Baron and first

Viscount and Earl Lyons, eldest son of the distinguished Admiral Sir

Edmund (subsequently first Baron Lyons), was apparently destined like

his younger brother for a naval career, since at the age of ten he was

already serving as an honorary midshipman. A sailor's life, however,

must have been singularly uncongenial to a person of pronounced

sedentary tastes whom nature had obviously designed for a bureaucrat; in

after years he never alluded to his naval experiences, and it was

probably with no slight satisfaction that the navy was exchanged for

Winchester. From Winchester he proceeded to Christ Church, Oxford, where

he took his degree in 1838, being apparently at that period a quiet,

well-behaved, hard-working youth, living carefully upon a modest

allowance, and greatly attached to his parents and family.

In the following year he entered the diplomatic service as unpaid

attaché at Athens, where his father occupied the position of Minister.

In 1844 he became a paid attaché at Athens, and passed thirteen

uneventful years at that post.

At this stage of his career, prospects looked far from promising; he

had started later than usual, being twenty-two at the period of his

entry into the service; younger men were senior to him; he had had no

opportunity of distinguishing himself at Athens, and as he laments in a

letter to the Foreign Secretary, Lord Malmesbury, written in April,

1852, he felt 'mortified and humiliated that a man six years younger

than himself had been passed over him as Secretary to the Legation in

which he had served for thirteen years.' Promotion indeed seemed so

remote that, having reached the age of thirty-five, he seriously

contemplated abandoning diplomacy altogether.

As a matter of fact, there was no cause for uneasiness. In 1852 he was

transferred as paid attaché to Dresden, and early in the following year

received the gratifying intimation that Lord John Russell, who had been

struck with his capacity, had appointed him paid attaché at Rome. 'What

I mean for him,' wrote Lord John Russell, 'is to succeed Mr. Petre, and

to conduct the Roman Mission, with £500 a year. If there were any post

of Secretary of Legation vacant I should gladly offer it to him, as I

have a very good opinion of him.' The importance of the post at Rome

consisted in the fact that, whereas technically dependent on the Tuscan

Mission at Florence, it was virtually semi-independent, and might

easily form an excellent stepping-stone to higher and more important

appointments if activity and discretion were displayed.

In June, 1853, Lyons started for his new post carrying despatches, and

as an illustration of the conditions of travel upon the continent at

that period, it is worth noticing that the expenses of his journey to

Rome amounted to no less a sum than £102 3_s_. 3_d_., inclusive of the

purchase and sale of a carriage, although no man was ever less prodigal

of public money. Nor is there any record of any official objection to

this somewhat alarming outlay.

In 1853 the Pontifical Government, exercising its sway over some

3,000,000 inhabitants of the Roman States, was in possession of no

inconsiderable portion of the Italian peninsula, and presented the

remarkable spectacle of a country jointly occupied by two foreign armies

whose task it was to protect the Pope against his own subjects. With

this object, 10,000 Austrians were stationed in the Ancona district, and

10,000 French troops in Rome, the latter paying their own expenses, but

the former constituting a heavy charge upon the Holy Father with his

embarrassed revenue and increasing deficit. The foreign policy of the

Government was in the hands of Cardinal Antonelli, and not long after

his arrival Lyons was able to write that in spite of 'his peculiar

position' (unaccredited to the Government in Rome), and that in some

quarters England is regarded as the natural enemy of the Papacy, I have

found that notwithstanding a very strong opinion to the contrary, at

Rome, as at most other places, one succeeds best by transacting one's

business in the most plain and straightforward manner, and through the

most direct channels. By acting on this principle and by being very

quiet and unobtrusive, I think I have in part allayed the suspicions

which are felt towards us always more or less at Rome, and I am

certainly on a better footing with Cardinal Antonelli than I had

at all expected to be.

The business between His Majesty's Government and that of Rome was not

of an overpowering nature, and was chiefly concerned with the proposed

establishment of regular diplomatic relations; with the alleged

intention of the Papal Government to create a Hierarchy in Scotland, and

with the inconvenient zeal of ardent Protestants in the Papal dominions.

As regards the establishment of diplomatic relations it seems highly

doubtful whether the Papal Government really desired to see a new

Protestant Mission at Rome: Cardinal Antonelli disclaimed any intention

of creating Roman Catholic Bishops in Scotland, but the religious

activity of British subjects in the Pope's dominions was a constant

source of petty troubles. It must be admitted, however, that it was

singularly easy to fall out with the Papal Government. The importation

of Bibles was forbidden, the distribution of tracts was punished with

imprisonment; one man of English extraction was incarcerated for a

lengthy period because, according to his own statements, he had not

communicated with sufficient regularity; and there were over 600

political prisoners in gaol at Rome at the same time.

As for the official relations between England and the Papal Government

they were friendly enough, and when the Crimean war broke out, feeling

at the Vatican was strongly anti-Russian, for it was believed that

whereas the Roman Catholic Church had nothing to fear from Protestants

and Mussulmans, the Greek schism was a real and threatening danger.

The following letter addressed to his brother, Captain Lyons, gives a

not uninteresting description of the life led in Rome by an unmarried

diplomatist without much private means, and incidentally shows the deep

affection which he entertained for his family.

* * * * *

Rome, January 3rd, 1855.

You may imagine what a relief to me it was, after reading your

letter of the 18th, to see Admiral Dundas' arrival at Constantinople

announced in the Malta paper. Your letter of the 3rd is almost,

indeed I think quite, the most interesting I ever read. The only

drawback to the delight all these letters are to me, is that you

were still lying up. That I hope is over, and that you will be very

prudent about it. We have now a weekly post from Constantinople and

Malta, which is a great comfort. Mention all the details you can in

your letters about the siege and operations by sea and land. The

Malta papers bring nothing that can be depended upon. Besides the

intense interest, it is a great advantage to me diplomatically to

have good intelligence to communicate here, and is a great help to

getting information, which is useful to me, on Roman matters.

Details about Sir E. and yourself are always the most precious

things you can write, and they cannot be too numerous or too minute.

My _ménage_ consists of two men. I am obliged to have two, in order

not to have to open the door myself, if I send one out. I have a

good-sized sitting room, much better furnished than most Roman

Lodgings, a second sitting room, which serves as Anteroom, and

Breakfast Room, good Bedroom and a Dressing Room. I have very little

sun, which I think an advantage, though in general it is thought the

greatest of disadvantages--I breakfast at home, and dine with some

of the other Diplomatists at a little quiet Table d'Hôte, where

there is a very good dinner. In winter I dine out three or four

times a week, and always spend the evening in society. I never do

anything at all in the way of hospitality. With the immense number

of English here, it would be impossible for me to get on, unless I

made this rule. In summer I had some men occasionally to play at

Whist, all of course Foreigners. I have taken my present lodging to

the end of June. My hope is to go to England for two or three months

about that time. I pay between 14 and £15 sterling a month for my

apartment. It is in a capital situation--and a second floor. It is

an admirable country for long rides, but very bad for short ones.

The pavement of the Town is so slippery that it is dangerous to ride

over it--most of the gates are at a very great distance, and after

you pass them, you have a mile or two of stone wall, before you get

out into the open country--which is beautiful and excellent for

riding. The result is that I never do ride. Being almost the only

Englishman here who has anything to do, beyond sight seeing and

amusement, my hours do not suit my Countrymen. My great friend is a

Count Gozze, Austrian Secretary of Legation. He is an old Dresden

friend of mine. Rome is a very rainy place, which obliges me often

to hire a carriage to go out in the evening. The hired carriages are

good, but dear, about nine shillings for an evening. Lord Walpole is

here--no one else I think that you know. I have scribbled all this

because you ask me, and because little details about the writer (if

one really cares for him) are generally the most interesting parts

of letters, written where there are no great events going on. You

would think me oldwomanish if I mentioned half my anxieties about

you and my Father.

A few months later, the brother, Captain Lyons, an exceptionally

promising and gallant naval officer, died of wounds received before

Sebastopol.

In 1856 promotion came in the shape of the secretaryship of Legation at

Florence, but he continued to be employed in Rome, and stood

twenty-second on a list of twenty-four secretaries of Legation. His

prospects of further advance did not appear reassuring, and in March

1857, he writes to his father (now a peer), 'My chance at present seems

to rest almost entirely on Lord Clarendon's disposition to give

practical effect to the good opinion he expresses of me. I should trust

with more confidence to that, if he had not promoted six secretaries of

Legation before me during my residence here, and afterwards offered me

as promotion the post of Secretary of Legation at Florence. Had it not

been for your visit to England at the critical moment, I should now have

been no more than simple Secretary of Legation, doing nothing at

Florence.'

In the autumn of 1857, Lord Normanby, Minister at Florence, having gone

on leave, Lyons was sent to take his place, and, instead of having

nothing to do, found himself at once involved in one of those trivial

questions which so deeply exercised the diplomacy of a former

generation, but which are now of rare occurrence.

Earlier in the year the Pope had paid a visit to Tuscany, and during his

stay at Florence a banquet was held in his honour, to which the members

of the diplomatic corps were invited. Much to their indignation they

were not accommodated at the Tavola di Stato or Sovereign Table, where

His Holiness was seated, and Lord Normanby, the British Minister, a

K.G., Ex-Viceroy, and social magnate, considered that an apology was

due from the Tuscan Government. Unfortunately for Lord Normanby, his

colleagues, having previously agreed to support him, backed out of their

undertaking, and the task of extracting an apology fell upon Lyons, for

Lord Normanby had departed uttering dark threats that he would not

return unless the apology was forthcoming. The Foreign Office took up

the matter seriously, and for no less than three months an animated

controversy was carried on, in the course of which 'The Tuscan

authorities showed themselves so thoroughly wrongheaded that every time

the subject was mentioned they said or did something which made it more

difficult for them to go back,' and Lord Clarendon administered to them

'a severe rebuke.' Finally, whether owing to the severe rebuke or not,

some sort of expression of regret was obtained; the injured Lord Normanby

returned to his post, and Lyons resumed his duties at Rome. Whence he

writes on March 6, 1858:--

The question of Reforms in the Papal Administration, which was so

much agitated during the Pope's journey and immediately afterwards,

appears to be entirely forgotten. The repressive measures which have

been adopted in France since the attempt on the Emperor[1] would

seem to render it difficult for H.M. to urge other sovereigns to

Liberal reforms. The mode in which the intelligence of the attempt

was received at Rome was shocking. One can hardly say that any class

expressed horror: the lower people openly declared their regret that

the crime had not been successful, and the middle classes took

little pains to conceal that they shared this feeling. In fact the

policy which is supposed to be adopted by France of coquetting with

the Liberal Party, without doing anything serious in their favour,

has alienated the sympathies of this part of Italy.

Reforms of a simple character were evidently urgently needed in the

Papal Administration, for just about this time a Canadian bishop and

other British tourists were openly plundered on the main road between

Rome and Civita Vecchia.

The turning point in Lyons's fortunes may be said to have arrived when

early in March he received orders from Lord Malmesbury to proceed to

Naples to inquire into the case of the _Cagliari_.

The _Cagliari_ was a mail steamer plying between Genoa, Sardinia and

Tunis, and on June 25, a number of Mazzinians who had taken passage in

her seized the master and the crew, altered the course of the vessel,

landed at the Island of Ponza in Neapolitan territory, where they

liberated three hundred political prisoners, and subsequently proceeded

to Sapri, in the neighbourhood of Salerno. Here they again disembarked,

expecting the inhabitants to rise in their favour, but encountered a

superior force of Neapolitan troops who killed or captured the whole

party, whilst the _Cagliari_ was seized by Neapolitan warships as

she was making her way ostensibly to Naples. Some weeks later it was

ascertained that amongst the prisoners in Naples were two English

engineers, Watt and Park by name, and it was stated that these two men

were entirely ignorant of the conspiracy, and had been forced by the

conspirators to work the engines under threats of being summarily

shot if they refused. Under the circumstances, as was only natural,

application was made by the British Government that they should at least

have a fair trial, and that the acting Vice-Consul at Naples should be

permitted to visit them in gaol.

Diplomatic relations between England and the Neapolitan Government

having been suspended for some years, Lord Clarendon wrote himself

direct to Signor Carafa, the Neapolitan Foreign Minister, in November,

urging the necessity of dealing with the case in an equitable spirit,

but with incredible perverseness and stupidity the Neapolitan Government

continued to refuse upon one pretext or another either to release the

men or to bring them to trial, or even to permit the Vice-Consul to

visit them. In March, 1858, Watt and Park were still in gaol, and had

been subjected to such abominable treatment that the health of both

was completely broken down, and Watt had become partially insane. Under

these circumstances, a change of government having in the meanwhile

occurred in England, Lord Malmesbury directed Lyons to proceed at once

to Naples and inquire into the case. Although the whole question had

been considerably complicated, partly owing to a note of Sir James

Hudson to the Sardinian Government having been unaccountably altered by

a member of his staff, and partly owing to a rooted belief on the part

of high Neapolitan legal authorities that engineers were responsible for

a ship's course, the Lyons Mission soon bore fruit, and the two

unfortunate Englishmen were both set free, nominally on bail, before the

end of the month, it having become evident to every one that they were

absolutely innocent. But the Neapolitan Government was by no means out

of its difficulties. It was pointed out that as two innocent men had

been imprisoned for nine months, and treated with great barbarity during

the greater part of the time, they were entitled to an indemnity which

was fixed at £3000. Worse was to follow, for, egged on by the Sardinian

Government, the British Government put forward a demand that the

_Cagliari_ should be surrendered on the ground that its capture had

been illegally effected. Both these demands were refused, and finally,

in May, 1858, a special messenger was sent to Naples instructing Lyons

to leave unless within ten days the Neapolitan Government consented to

accept mediation, and stating that England would make common cause with

Sardinia under certain circumstances.

The message could not have been an agreeable one to deliver, and what

the Neapolitan Government disliked more than anything else was the

appearance of yielding to Sardinia. 'Ah! s'il n'y avait que l'Angleterre!'

had always been the expression used by Signor Carafa; but his Government

had placed itself hopelessly in the wrong, and Lyons was able to report

that the indemnity would be paid, and that the _Cagliari_ had been

placed 'at his disposal.' It was an additional satisfaction to him to

add that: 'Far from threatening, I did not even go so far as my

instructions warranted, for I did not say that His Majesty's Government

proposed that the mediator should retire at the end of three months, nor

did I tell Signor Carafa that I was myself ordered to go back to Rome if

the mediation should be refused at the expiration of ten days.'

In spite of the unpleasant nature of this affair, Lyons contrived to

remain on the very best of terms with the Neapolitan Ministers with whom

he had to deal, and Lord Malmesbury was so favourably impressed with his

tact and skill that he at once appointed him Minister at Florence. His

professional future was now assured; but far greater honours were in

store for him, for in November, 1858, came the offer of the Washington

Legation, an offer which, with characteristic modesty, he accepted with

considerable misgivings as to his competence. Nor could it be said that

success had arrived with unusual rapidity, for he was already forty-one.

In the same month he succeeded to the peerage on the death of his

father. His mother had died some years previously; his brother had

perished in the Crimea, and the only remaining near relatives were his

two sisters, one of whom was married to the Duke of Norfolk, and the

other to a Bavarian gentleman, Baron von Würtzburg.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Napoleon III.

Lord Lyons: A Record of British Diplomacy, Vol. 1 of 2 · 第 1 / 11 章