CHAPTER XIII.

NEW YORK; NEW SWEDEN.

The treaty with the Mohawks caused the utmost joy throughout the

settlements of New Netherlands. In May 1646, the brave and good Peter

Stuyvesant arrived as governor, and the same year Kieft sailed for

Europe, he being expelled the colony as the author of so much misery,

the West India company also resenting his barbarous measures. But the

vengeance of Heaven seemed to follow him on the sea, as the execrations

of the Dutch had followed him from land. The large and richly laden ship

in which he embarked was wrecked on the coast of Wales, and he and

eighty others perished in the remorseless waves.

Stuyvesant, a man of good education, as well as a truehearted, brave old

soldier, who had lost a leg in the wars, introduced a much milder line

of policy into the government of New Netherlands as regarded the

natives. In comparison with the New England settlements, New Netherlands

could not be said to have flourished, nor even had they, in a pecuniary

point of view, with all their trading engagements, proved a lucrative

speculation to the Dutch West India company; the truth was, they lacked

that element of freedom, both politically and commercially, on which

true prosperity is based. Manhattan did not flourish until its merchants

“obtained freedom to follow out their own impulses.” The merchants of

Amsterdam, at that time the first commercial city of the world, knew

this when, addressing their brethren at Manhattan, they said, “when your

commerce has become established, and your ships ride on every part of

the ocean, throngs that look towards you with eager eyes will be allured

to embark for your island.” But these words, though prophetic, as the

historian remarks, of the future destiny of that port, were fated not to

be fulfilled by the enterprise of Dutch merchants.

At the time of Stuyvesant’s assumption of office, the settlers in New

Netherlands amounted but to about 6,000. A few huts were gathered round

Fort Orange or Beaverswyk, as the present town of Albany was then

called; Long Island was still almost wholly uncleared forest, and “the

land there was of so little account, that Stuyvesant thought it no wrong

to his employers to purchase of them, at a small price, an extensive

bowery just beyond the coppices, among which browsed the goats and kine

of the village.” Nor was New Amsterdam, the seat of government, anything

more than a rude village of huts, protected by palisades, while the fort

itself could scarcely be considered a place of defence.

A colony so feeble could hardly be expected to preserve its borders from

the invasion of neighbours as vigorous and of as expansive a character

as those of New England, more especially as the puritan colonists never

scrupled to question the right of their weaker neighbours to any

territory at all. One of the first duties which the new governor,

therefore, undertook, was an adjustment of this disputed question of

boundary. It was a very difficult one. Restricted from war by the West

India company, he bent his efforts to negotiation; and going himself in

person to Hartford, a treaty was concluded on the 11th of November,

1650, by which the Dutch relinquished their claim to Connecticut, and

the New Englanders consented to their retaining possession of one-half

of Long Island. Poor as these conditions appear for the Dutch, the West

India company ratified the treaty, which the English never would do.

Well might the Dutch say, “the New England people are too powerful for

us.”

In 1651, war broke out between England and Holland. We have already seen

the good sense of Massachusetts in refusing to take part in it against

their Dutch neighbours; but we have not mentioned that Roger Williams,

then in England, was the means of delaying an armament against New

Netherlands. The Dutch, on their part, not expecting this magnanimity

from their powerful neighbours, and aware of their own incapacity for

the contest, endeavoured to purchase the aid of the Narragansetts in

case of attack; but Mixam, one of the chiefs, replied nobly; “I am poor,

but no presents of goods or of guns, or of powder and shot, shall draw

me into a conspiracy against my friends the English.” Fortunately, as we

have already related, peace was soon established between the two

European states, and the fleet which Cromwell had sent out against New

Netherlands directed its energies against another power.

But the New England colonists were not the only cause of anxiety to the

governor of New Netherlands; on the banks of the Delaware, the colony of

New Sweden was becoming an important rival in the tobacco trade with

Virginia., and for the beaver of the Schuylkill. Stuyvesant, therefore,

built Fort Casimir, near the mouth of the Brandywine River, as a

protection of Dutch commerce in that quarter. This fort being only five

miles from Fort Christiana, was regarded as an encroachment by the

Dutch; and Rising, the Swedish governor, making use of an unworthy

stratagem, overpowered the garrison and took possession. This was a

fatal deed. Stuyvesant received orders from the Dutch West India company

to make reprisals, and in September, 1655, sailed from New Amsterdam

with a force of 600, and entering the Delaware, found his career of

conquest so easy that it was almost inglorious. One fort after another

yielded; it seemed incredible that these men were of the race who, with

Gustavus at their head, had filled Europe with the renown of their arms.

But so it was; Rising capitulated on honourable terms, and the whole

Swedish colony—600 only in number, it must, however, be

remembered—acknowledged the jurisdiction of the Dutch; and, as a

separate state, New Sweden was at an end.

Of the colony thus absorbed—the colony that connects America with the

age as well as with the noble mind of Gustavus Adolphus—we must say yet

a few words, and these shall be from Fredrika Bremer, who, with natural

patriotism, visited the site of this Swedish settlement, and saw the few

relics which remain to this day. She says: “I was invited to meet at the

house of the present minister, an American, all the descendants of the

earliest Swedish settlers whom he knew. It was a company of from fifty

to sixty; there was, however, nothing Swedish about them but their

family names. No traditions of their emigration hither remain; language,

appearance, all have entirely merged into that of the now prevailing

Anglo-Saxon race. The church clock alone had something Swedish about it,

something of the character of the peasant’s clock. In the church, also,

was a large book placed upon a tall stand, on the page of which might be

read in large letters, “The people who dwelt in darkness have seen a

great light.” This inscription, together with the old church at

Willington in Delaware, and a few family names, are all that remain of

this early Swedish colony on the eastern shores of the New World. Yet

no, not all. A noble, peaceful memory of its life continues to exist on

the page of history, like a lovely episode of Idyllian purity and

freshness. The pilgrims of New England stained its soil with blood by

their injustice and cruelty to the Indians. The Swedish pilgrims, in

their treatment of the natives, were so just and wise, that during the

whole time of Swedish dominion, not one drop of Indian blood was shed by

them; the Indians loved them and called them ‘our own people.’ ‘The

Swedes are a God-fearing people,’ said William Penn; ‘they are

industrious and contented, and much attached to the customs and manners

of the mother-country. They live by agriculture, and the breeding of

cattle; the women are good housewives, spin and weave, take care of

their families, and bring up their children well.’” All historians agree

that the Swedes who thus became amalgamated into the general population

introduced into it a sound element of moral life, by which it has been

improved.

The dominion of the Dutch seemed now firmly established in the New

World; and the worth of such a colony began to be appreciated at home;

its great extent—from New England to Maryland, from the sea to the great

river of Canada and the remote north-western wilderness—was a subject of

boast. Emigration to the banks of the Hudson was encouraged. Merchants

now were beginning to be allured to Manhattan, and all presented an

aspect of promise for the future. Stuyvesant, who, seeming to have a

high idea of the prerogatives of governor, was inclined to rule with an

arbitrary hand, was kept under control by the directors at home; who,

when he took it upon himself to inspect the merchants’ books, checked

him with the reproof that “it was an unprecedented act in Christendom,

and that he must behave well to the merchants;” and when—himself a

violent Calvinist—he inclined to persecute the Lutherans, and imitating

Massachusetts, began to imprison and banish “the abominable sect of

Quakers,” he received the injunction, “Let every peaceful citizen enjoy

freedom of conscience; this maxim has made our city the asylum for

fugitives from every land; tread in its steps, and you shall be

blessed.”

And, treading in its steps, New Netherlands became the asylum and chosen

home of the oppressed, the persecuted and the enterprising of every

European nation. Jews and Christians all crowded over, all were united

to help in building up the colony; and troops of orphans, made so by war

and persecution, were shipped to the New World; and “a free passage was

offered to mechanics, farmers and labourers, foreigners and exiles—men

inured to toil and penury.” New York was even then laying its

cosmopolitan foundations; “its settlers were relics of the first-fruits

of the Reformation, from the Belgic provinces, from England, from

France; Protestants who had escaped from the massacre of St.

Bartholomew’s-eve, from Bohemia, from Germany and Switzerland, from

Piedmont and the Italian Alps.”[4] Even Africa had her representatives

in this home of all people, though her sons were not there by their own

voluntary choice. Among the other commercial speculations of the West

India company was the traffic in slaves; they had their trading stations

on the coast of Guinea, whence cargoes of negroes were shipped to

Manhattan. Stuyvesant was required by his employers to advance the sale

of negro slaves as much as lay in his power; these slaves were sold at

public auctions, the average price being about £12 per man. When the

demand was not great at Manhattan, they were sent on to the puritan

colonies. Slaves who continued the property of the company were, after a

certain time of bondage, settled on small farms, for which they paid a

stipulated amount of produce.

“The colony increased,” says Bancroft; “the villages were full of

children; the new year and the month of May were welcomed in with merry

frolics; New Netherlands was not an ascetic colony, like those of New

England; May-poles and dancing were allowed; the vine and the mulberry

were cultivated; the whale was pursued off the coast; flocks and herds

multiplied, and the tile, so long imported from Holland, began to be

manufactured near Fort Orange. New Amsterdam could, in a few years,

boast of stately buildings, and vied with Boston. ‘This happily situated

province,’ said its inhabitants, ‘may become the granary of our

fatherland; by God’s blessing we shall in a few years become a mighty

people.’”

With all these new elements of vitality, a bolder and freer spirit had

entered the colony. The people demanded a share of political power. They

were infected by the liberties of New England, and nothing less would

satisfy them. They assembled, and a petition, drawn up by George Baxter,

was presented by their delegates, requiring “that no laws should be

enacted without the consent of the people; that none should be appointed

to office but with the approbation of the people.”

This was an unheard-of measure; Stuyvesant was indignant; he had no

faith, he said, in the wavering multitude; and then he taunted them

because a New England man had drawn up their petition. “If the people

chose their own officers, he said, then the thief would vote for the

thief, the smuggler for the smuggler, and fraud and vice would become

privileged. No! he and the directors would never make themselves

responsible to subjects.” The delegates attempted to reason, and the

wilful old governor dissolved the assembly on pain of punishment.

The directors sanctioned the conduct of Stuyvesant. “Have no regard to

the consent of the people,” wrote they to him; “let them no longer

indulge the visionary dream that taxes can be imposed only by their

consent.” But the people obstinately indulged such dreams, and refused

to pay obnoxious taxes; and, even more than that, in the determination

to enjoy English liberties, saw with no unwillingness the possibility of

English jurisdiction extending even over New Netherlands.

A tempest was again brooding. Although the Dutch still kept possession

of the country as far south as Cape Henlopen, yet their claims were

disputed by Lord Baltimore, the proprietary of Maryland; and in 1659,

that nobleman’s rights being established, Fendall, then governor, laid

formal claim to Delaware; the College of Nineteen of the West India

company firmly disavowed it; and Fendall, being equally determined, the

directors declared their resolve to defend their rights, “even to the

spilling of blood.” Nor was the aspect of affairs more pacific on the

north. Massachusetts, as well as

New Netherlands, claimed the territory adjoining the upper waters of the

Hudson, and thence westerly as far as she pleased; whilst Connecticut,

which had just then obtained a charter, put forth her claim to territory

which the Dutch had hitherto held unquestioned.

“Where, then,” demanded the Dutch, with reference to all these absorbing

claims,—“where, then, is New Netherlands?” And the people of

Connecticut, speaking as if for all, replied, “We do not know.”

A homely proverb may seem inconsistent with the gravity of history, but

it may nevertheless be applicable on some occasions, as in the Dutch

settlements at this juncture, when misfortune seemed not only to _rain_,

but to _pour_. These contentions with regard to territory were carried

on during a renewed Indian war, which laid waste a village on the banks

of the Esopus, many of the inhabitants being murdered or carried into

captivity. The approach of winter alone put a stop to these horrors; and

that which added still more to the misery of the time, was the fact that

New Netherlands stood alone: none of its more powerful and fortunate

neighbours came to its rescue; it had no friends but the Mohawks, who

said, “The Dutch are our brethren. We keep with them but one council

fire; we are united by a covenant chain.” And not only were their

neighbours unwilling to help them, but there was no patriotism, no

public spirit, as yet within the heart of the state itself; New

Netherlands could neither help herself, nor would the council at home

advance either men or money for her defence. Alarmed and perplexed in

this crisis, Stuyvesant was ready to concede those privileges to the

people which he had hitherto refused. In 1663, a popular assembly was

convened. In the spring of the following year it met again, but by that

time new troubles were at hand. Rumours of an English invasion filled

the colony; and the representatives, seeing the paucity of means of

defence, contemplated very coolly the necessity of submission to this

new enemy. “If you cannot defend us,” said they, addressing the

governor, “to whom shall we turn?” And the governor, wishing to rouse a

spirit of patriotism in their souls, proposed that “every third man

should enlist for the defence of their adopted country, as had once been

done in the Fatherland.” But the people would not adopt his proposal. In

vain was a witty libeller of the magistrates fastened to a stake with a

bridle in his mouth; people _would_ talk rather than act. In the autumn

of 1664, “Long Island had revolted, the settlements on the Esopus

wavered, and the Connecticut men had possessed themselves by purchase

from the Indians of the whole sea-coast as far as North River.”

Stuyvesant wrote these alarming tidings to Holland.

Whilst England and Holland were yet at peace, three ships, with one

hundred men, were despatched from England to take possession of New

Netherlands in the name of the Duke of York, afterwards James II., to

whom his brother, Charles II., disregarding all previous chartered

claims, had granted a vast extent of territory, called New York,

including the country between the St. Croix and the Pemaquid, and on the

east the region between the Connecticut and the Delaware, with all the

islands south and west of Cape Cod, completely swallowing up New

Netherlands, and encroaching on Massachusetts and Connecticut. Under the

conduct of Sir Richard Nichols, groom of the bedchamber to the Duke of

York, the English squadron, having first touched at Boston, where they

demanded a levy of forces for their expedition, anchored before New

Amsterdam, which was totally unprepared for defence. In vain Stuyvesant

endeavoured to rouse a spirit of resistance in the inhabitants; the town

was at the mercy of the English, and the people were prepared for

nothing but surrender. It would have been madness to have striven

against such odds. Winthrop, now governor of Connecticut, and a true

friend of the Dutch, was on board the English fleet, and acted as

mediator. Stuyvesant, almost heart-broken, pleaded that “a surrender

would be reproved in the Fatherland;” and when the principal

inhabitants, who had assembled in the town-hall, demanded to see the

letter which the English commander had sent, he indignantly tore it to

pieces; the burghers, angry at this, drew up a protest against the

governor.

The next day, a deputation waited on Nichols, but he declined the

conference, informing them that on the morrow he should be at Manhattan,

and would see them there; and on a slight show of dissatisfaction added,

“raise the white flag of peace, for I shall come with ships of war and

soldiers!”

The flag of peace was hoisted; and on September 8th, the life, liberty,

religion and property of the inhabitants being secured, New Amsterdam

surrendered, and the people and the magistrates being all agreed,

Stuyvesant reluctantly ratified the capitulation.

New Amsterdam was no more; the Dutch dominion in America was overthrown

by a flagrant act of injustice, and yet the change seemed to produce in

the colony itself great satisfaction. Very few of the settlers removed

to Holland, and their wounded national pride found its consolation in

the enjoyment of English privileges and liberties. On the submission of

the capital, Fort Orange, now called Albany, from the Scottish title of

the Duke of York, quietly surrendered, and the Dutch and the Swedes of

Delaware shortly afterwards. The league with the Five Nations was

renewed. The whole extent of coast, from Acadia to Florida, was now in

possession of the English.

Three years afterwards, when a treaty of peace was signed between

England and Holland, the colony of Surinam, in Guiana, which the Dutch

had captured during the war, was left in their possession as a

compensation for New Netherlands. About the same time, the province of

Acadia was restored by treaty to France, greatly to the vexation of the

people of New England.

A popular history of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 13 / 28 章