Chapter III. On a lofty tumulus near the megalithic remains at Carnac, in

Brittany, the custom still prevails of lighting a large bonfire at the

time of the summer solstice; it is called Tan Heol, or Tan St. Jean. In

Ireland, the bonfires also take place on St. John's Eve, and a

correspondent, who has often witnessed them in County Waterford, writes

that "women, with garments raised, jump through these fires, and conduct

which, on ordinary occasions would be reprobated, is regarded as excusable

and harmless." Outside Europe, the Berbers of Morocco still maintain this

midsummer festival, and in the Rif they light bonfires; here the fires

seem to be now regarded as mainly purificatory, but they are associated

with eating ceremonies which are still regarded as multiplicative.

(Westermarck, "Midsummer Customs in Morocco," _Folk-Lore_, March, 1905.)

[141] Mannhardt (op. cit., p. 469) quotes a description of an Ehstonian

festival in the Island of Moon, when the girls dance in a circle round the

fire, and one of them,--to the envy of the rest, and the pride of her own

family,--is chosen by the young men, borne away so violently that her

clothes are often torn, and thrown down by a youth, who places one leg

over her body in a kind of symbolical coitus, and lies quietly by her side

till morning. The spring festivals of the young people of Ukrainia, in

which, also, there is singing, dancing, and sleeping together, are

described in "Folk-Lore de l'Ukrainie." Kryptadia, vol. v, pp. 2-6, and

vol. viii, pp. 303 et seq.

[142] M. Kowalewsky, "Marriage Among the Early Slavs," _Folk-Lore_,

December, 1890.

[143] A. Tille, however (_Yule and Christmas_, 1899), while admitting that

the general Aryan division of the year was dual, follows Tacitus in

asserting that the Germanic division of the year (like the Egyptian) was

tripartite: winter, spring, and summer.

[144] Grimm, _Teutonic Mythology_ (English translation by Stallybrass),

pp. 612-630, 779, 788.

[145] Wellhausen, _Reste Arabischen Heidentums_, 1897, p. 98.

[146] See, e.g., the chapter on ritual in Gérard-Varet's interesting book,

_L'Ignorance et l'Irreflexion_, 1899, for a popular account of this and

allied primitive conceptions.

[147] Jastrow, _Religion of Babylonia_, especially pp. 485, 571; regarding

the priestesses, Jastrow remarks: "Among many nations, the mysterious

aspects of woman's fertility lead to rites that, by a perversion of their

original import, appear to be obscene. The prostitutes were priestesses

attached to the Ishtar cult, and who took part in ceremonies intended to

symbolize fertility." Whether there is any significance in the fact that

the first two months of the Babylonian year (roughly corresponding to our

March and April), when we should expect births to be at a maximum, were

dedicated to Ea and Bel, who, according to varying legends, were the

creators of man, and that New Year's Day was the festival of Bau, regarded

as the mother of mankind, I cannot say, but the suggestion may be put

forward.

[148] _Celtic Heathendom_, p. 421.

[149] Grimm, _Teutonic Mythology_, p. 1465. In England, the November,

bonfires have become merged into the Guy Fawkes celebrations. In the East,

the great primitive autumn festivals seem to have fallen somewhat earlier.

In Babylonia, the seventh month (roughly corresponding to September) was

specially sacred, though nothing is known of its festivals, and this also

was the sacred festival month of the Hebrews, and originally of the Arabs.

In Europe, among the southern Slavs, the Reigen, or Kolo--wild dances by

girls, adorned with flowers, and with skirts girt high, followed by sexual

intercourse--take place in autumn, during the nights following harvest

time.

[150] A. Tille, _Yule and Christmas_, p. 21, etc.

[151] Long before Wargentin, however, Rabelais had shown some interest in

this question, and had found that there were most christenings in October

and November, this showing, he pointed out, that the early warmth of

spring influenced the number of conceptions (_Pantagruel_, liv. v, Ch.

XXIX). The spring maximum of conceptions is not now so early in France.

[152] Villermé, "De la Distribution par mois des conceptions," _Annales

d'Hygiène Publique_, tome v, 1831, pp. 55-155.

[153] Sormani, _Giornale di Medicina Militare_, 1870.

[154] Throughout Europe, it may be said, marriages tend to take place

either in spring or autumn (Oettinger _Moralstatistik_, p. 181, gives

details). That is to say, that there is a tendency for marriages to take

place at the season of the great public festivals, during which sexual

intercourse was prevalent in more primitive times.

[155] Hill, _Nature_, July 12, 1888.

[156] G. Mayr, _Die Gesetzmässigkeit im Gesellschaftsleben_, 1877, p. 240.

[157] Edward Smith (_Health and Disease_), who attributes this to the

lessened vitality of offspring at that season. Beukemann also states that

children born in September have most vitality.

[158] Westermarck has even suggested that the December maximum of

conceptions may be due to better chance of survival for September

offspring (_Human Marriage_, Chapter II). It may be noted that though the

maximum of conceptions is in May, relatively the smallest proportion of

boys is conceived at that time. (Rauber, _Der Ueberschuss an

Knabengeburten_, p. 39.)

[159] Krieger found that the great majority of German women investigated

by him menstruated for the first time in September, October, or November.

In America, Bowditch states that the first menstruation of country girls

more often occurs in spring than at any other season.

[160] _Women's Medical Journal_, 1894.

[161] It is, perhaps, worth while noting that the wisdom of the mediæval

Church found an outlet for this "spring fever" in pilgrimages to remote

shrines. As Chaucer wrote, in the _Canterbury Tales_:--

"Whané that Aprille with his showers sote

The droughts of March hath piercèd to the root,

Thaen longen folk to gon on pilgrimages,

And palmers for to seeken strangé stronds."

[162] L.W. Kline, "The Migratory Impulse," _American Journal of

Psychology_, 1898, vol. x, especially pp. 21-24.

[163] Mania comes to a crisis in spring, said the old physician, Aretæus

(Bk. 1, Ch. V).

[164] This is, at all events, the case in France, Prussia, and Italy. See,

for instance, Durkheim's discussion of the cosmic factors of suicide, _Le

Suicide_, 1897, Chapter III. In Spain, as Bernaldo de Quirós shows

(_Criminologia_, p. 69), there is a slight irregular rise in December, but

otherwise the curve is perfectly regular, with maximum in June, and

minimum in January.

[165] This holds good of a south European country, taken separately. A

chart of the annual incidence of suicide by hanging, in Roumania,

presented by Minovici (_Archives d'Anthropologie Criminelle_, 1905, p.

587), shows climaxes of equal height in May and September.

[166] Morselli, _Suicide_, pp. 55-72.

[167] Ogle himself was inclined to think that these breaks were

accidental, being unaware of the allied phenomena with which they may be

brought into line. It is true that (as Gaedeken objects to me) the

autumnal break is very slight, but it is probably real when we are dealing

with so large a mass of data.

[168] _Pedagogical Seminary_, June, 1891, p. 298. For a very full summary

and bibliography of investigations regarding growth, see F. Burk, "Growth

of Children in Height and Weight," _American Journal of Psychology_,

April, 1898.

[169] _L'Année Psychologique_, 1898.

[170] _Lancet_, June 6, 1891. Edward Smith had pointed out many years

earlier that scarlet fever is most fatal in periods of increasing

vitality.

[171] Havelock Ellis, "The Bladder as a Dynamometer," _American Journal of

Dermatology_, May, 1902.

[172] See, e.g., summary in _Internationales Centrablatt für

Anthropologie_, 1902, Heft 4, p. 207.

[173] Summarized in _Zeitschrift für Psychologie der Sinnesorgane_, 1903,

p. 135.

[174] Camerer found that from September to November is the period of

greatest metabolic activity.

[175] Haig, _Uric Acid_, 6th edition, 1903, p. 33.

AUTO-EROTISM: A STUDY OF THE SPONTANEOUS MANIFESTATIONS OF THE SEXUAL

IMPULSE.

I.

Definition of Auto-erotism--Masturbation only Covers a Small Portion of

the Auto-erotic Field--The Importance of this Study, especially

To-day--Auto-erotic Phenomena in Animals--Among Savage and Barbaric

Races--The Japanese _rin-no-tama_ and other Special Instruments for

Obtaining Auto-erotic Gratification--Abuse of the Ordinary Implements and

Objects of Daily Life--The Frequency of Hair-pin in the Bladder--The

Influence of Horse-exercise and Railway Traveling--The Sewing-machine and

the Bicycle--Spontaneous Passive Sexual Excitement--_Delectatio

Morosa_--Day-dreaming--_Pollutio_--Sexual Excitement During Sleep--Erotic

Dreams--The Analogy of Nocturnal Enuresis--Differences in the Erotic

Dreams of Men and Women--The Auto-erotic Phenomena of Sleep in the

Hysterical--Their Frequently Painful Character.

By "auto-erotism" I mean the phenomena of spontaneous sexual emotion

generated in the absence of an external stimulus proceeding, directly or

indirectly, from another person. In a wide sense, which cannot be wholly

ignored here, auto-erotism may be said to include those transformations of

repressed sexual activity which are a factor of some morbid conditions as

well as of the normal manifestation of art and poetry, and, indeed, more

or less color the whole of life.

Such a definition excludes the normal sexual excitement aroused by the

presence of a beloved person of the opposite sex; it also excludes the

perverted sexuality associated with an attraction to a person of the same

sex; it further excludes the manifold forms of erotic fetichism, in which

the normal focus of sexual attraction is displaced, and voluptuous

emotions are only aroused by some object--hair, shoes, garments,

etc.--which, to the ordinary lover, are of subordinate--though still,

indeed, considerable--importance.[176] The auto-erotic field remains

extensive; it ranges from occasional voluptuous day-dreams, in which the

subject is entirely passive, to the perpetual unashamed efforts at sexual

self-manipulation witnessed among the insane. It also includes, though

chiefly as curiosities, those cases in which individuals fall in love with

themselves. Among auto-erotic phenomena, or on the borderland, we must

further include those religious sexual manifestations for an ideal object,

of which we may find evidence in the lives of saints and ecstatics.[177]

The typical form of auto-erotism is the occurrence of the sexual orgasm

during sleep.

I do not know that any apology is needful for the invention of the term

"auto-erotism."[178] There is no existing word in current use to indicate

the whole range of phenomena I am here concerned with. We are familiar

with "masturbation," but that, strictly speaking, only covers a special

and arbitrary subdivision of the field, although, it is true, the

subdivision with which physicians and alienists have chiefly occupied

themselves. "Self-abuse" is somewhat wider, but by no means covers the

whole ground, while for various reasons it is an unsatisfactory term.

"Onanism" is largely used, especially in France, and some writers even

include all forms of homosexual connection under this name; it may be

convenient to do so from a physiological point of view, but it is a

confusing and antiquated mode of procedure, and from the psychological

standpoint altogether illegitimate; "onanism" ought never to be used in

this connection, if only on the ground that Onan's device was not

auto-erotic, but was an early example of withdrawal before emission, or

_coitus interruptus_.

While the name that I have chosen may possibly not be the best, there

should be no question as to the importance of grouping all these phenomena

together. It seems to me that this field has rarely been viewed in a

scientifically sound and morally sane light, simply because it has not

been viewed as a whole. We have made it difficult so to view it by

directing our attention on the special group of auto-erotic facts--that

group included under masturbation--which was most easy to observe and

which in an extreme form came plainly under medical observation in

insanity and allied conditions, and we have wilfully torn this group of

facts away from the larger group to which it naturally belongs. The

questions which have been so widely, so diversely, and--it must

unfortunately be added--often so mischievously discussed, concerning the

nature and evils of masturbation are not seen in their true light and

proportions until we realize that masturbation is but a specialized form

of a tendency which in some form or in some degree normally affects not

only man, but all the higher animals. From a medical point of view it is

often convenient to regard masturbation as an isolated fact; but in order

to understand it we must bear in mind its relationships. In this study of

auto-erotism I shall frequently have occasion to refer to the old entity

of "masturbation," because it has been more carefully studied than any

other part of the auto-erotic field; but I hope it will always be borne in

mind that the psychological significance and even the medical diagnostic

value of masturbation cannot be appreciated unless we realize that it is

an artificial subdivision of a great group of natural facts.

The study of auto-erotism is far from being an unimportant or merely

curious study. Yet psychologists, medical and non-medical, almost without

exception, treat its manifestations--when they refer to them at all--in a

dogmatic and off-hand manner which is far from scientific. It is not

surprising, therefore, that the most widely divergent opinions are

expressed. Nor is it surprising that ignorant and chaotic notions among

the general population should lead to results that would be ludicrous if

they were not pathetic. To mention one instance known to me: a married

lady who is a leader in social-purity movements and an enthusiast for

sexual chastity, discovered, through reading some pamphlet against

solitary vice, that she had herself been practicing masturbation for years

without knowing it. The profound anguish and hopeless despair of this

woman in face of what she believed to be the moral ruin of her whole life

cannot well be described. It would be easy to give further examples,

though scarcely a more striking one, to show the utter confusion into

which we are thrown by leaving this matter in the hands of blind leaders

of the blind. Moreover, the conditions of modern civilization render

auto-erotism a matter of increasing social significance. As our

marriage-rate declines, and as illicit sexual relationships continue to be

openly discouraged, it is absolutely inevitable that auto-erotic phenomena

of one kind or another, not only among women but also among men, should

increase among us both in amount and intensity. It becomes, therefore, a

matter of some importance, both to the moralist and the physician, to

investigate the psychological nature of these phenomena and to decide

precisely what their attitude should be toward them.

I do not purpose to enter into a thorough discussion of all the aspects of

auto-erotism. That would involve a very extensive study indeed. I wish to

consider briefly certain salient points concerning auto-erotic phenomena,

especially their prevalence, their nature, and their moral, physical, and

other effects. I base my study partly on the facts and opinions which

during the last thirty years have been scattered through the periodical

and other medical literature of Europe and America, and partly on the

experience of individuals, especially of fairly normal individuals.

Among animals in isolation, and sometimes in freedom--though this can less

often be observed--it is well known that various forms of spontaneous

solitary sexual excitement occur. Horses when leading a lazy life may be

observed flapping the penis until some degree of emission takes place.

Welsh ponies, I learn from a man who has had much experience with these

animals, habitually produce erections and emissions in their stalls; they

do not bring their hind quarters up during this process, and they close

their eyes, which does not take place when they have congress with mares.

The same informant observed that bulls and goats produce emissions by

using their forelegs as a stimulus, bringing up their hind quarters, and

mares rub themselves against objects. I am informed by a gentleman who is

a recognized authority on goats, that they sometimes take the penis into

the mouth and produce actual orgasm, thus practicing auto-fellatio. As

regards ferrets, the Rev. H. Northcote states: "I am informed by a

gentleman who has had considerable experience of ferrets, that if the

bitch, when in heat, cannot obtain a dog she pines and becomes ill. If a

smooth pebble is introduced into the hutch, she will masturbate upon it,

thus preserving her normal health for one season. But if this artificial

substitute is given to her a second season, she will not, as formerly, be

content with it."[179]

Stags in the rutting season, when they have no partners, rub themselves

against trees to produce ejaculation. Sheep masturbate; as also do camels,

pressing themselves down against convenient objects; and elephants

compress the penis between the hind legs to obtain emissions.[180]

Blumenbach observed a bear act somewhat similarly on seeing other bears

coupling, and hyenas, according to Ploss and Bartels, have been seen

practicing mutual masturbation by licking each other's genitals. Mammary

masturbation, remarks Féré, is found in certain female and even male

animals, like the dog and the cat.[181] Apes are much given to

masturbation, even in freedom, according to the evidence of good

observers; for while no female apes are celibates, many of the males are

obliged to lead a life of celibacy.[182] Male monkeys use the hand in

masturbation, to rub and shake the penis.[183]

In the human species these phenomena are by no means found in civilization

alone. To whatever extent masturbation may have been developed by the

conditions of European life, which carry to the utmost extreme the

concomitant stimulation, and repression of the sexual emotions, it is far

from being, as Mantegazza has declared it to be, one of the moral

characteristics of Europeans.[184] It is found among the people of nearly

every race of which we have any intimate knowledge, however natural the

conditions under which men and women may live.[185] Thus, among the Nama

Hottentots, among the young women at all events, Gustav Fritsch found that

masturbation is so common that it is regarded as a custom of the country;

no secret is made of it, and in the stories and legends of the race it is

treated as one of the most ordinary facts of life. It is so also among the

Basutos, and the Kaffirs are addicted to the same habit.[186] The Fuegians

have a word for masturbation, and a special word for masturbation by

women.[187] When the Spaniards first arrived at Vizcaya, in the

Philippines, they found that masturbation was universal, and that it was

customary for the women to use an artificial penis and other abnormal

methods of sexual gratification. Among the Balinese, according to Jacobs

(as quoted by Ploss and Bartels), masturbation is general; in the boudoir

of many a Bali beauty, he adds, and certainly in every harem, may be found

a wax penis to which many hours of solitude are devoted. Throughout the

East, as Eram, speaking from a long medical experience, has declared,

masturbation is very prevalent, especially among young girls. In Egypt,

according to Sonnini, it is prevalent in harems. In India, a medical

correspondent tells me, he once treated the widow of a wealthy Mohammedan,

who informed him that she began masturbation at an early age, "just like

all other women." The same informant tells me that on the _façade_ of a

large temple in Orissa are bas-reliefs, representing both men and women,

alone, masturbating, and also women masturbating men. Among the Tamils of

Ceylon masturbation is said to be common. In Cochin China, Lorion remarks,

it is practiced by both sexes, but especially by the married women.[188]

Japanese women have probably carried the mechanical arts of auto-erotism

to the highest degree of perfection. They use two hollow balls about the

size of a pigeon's egg (sometimes one alone is used), which, as described

by Joest, Christian, and others,[189] are made of very thin leaf of brass;

one is empty, the other (called the little man) contains a small heavy

metal ball, or else some quicksilver, and sometimes metal tongues which

vibrate when set in movement; so that if the balls are held in the hand

side by side there is a continuous movement. The empty one is first

introduced into the vagina in contact with the uterus, then the other; the

slightest movement of the pelvis or thighs, or even spontaneous movement

of the organs, causes the metal ball (or the quicksilver) to roll, and the

resulting vibration produces a prolonged voluptuous titillation, a gentle

shock as from a weak electric inductive apparatus; the balls are called

_rin-no-tama_, and are held in the vagina by a paper tampon. The women who

use these balls delight to swing themselves in a hammock or rocking-chair,

the delicate vibration of the balls slowly producing the highest degree of

sexual excitement. Joest mentions that this apparatus, though well known

by name to ordinary girls, is chiefly used by the more fashionable

_geishas_, as well as by prostitutes. Its use has now spread to China,

Annam, and India. Japanese women also, it is said, frequently use an

artificial penis of paper or clay, called e.g.. Among the Atjeh, again,

according to Jacobs (as quoted by Ploss), the young of both sexes

masturbate and the elder girls use an artificial penis of wax. In China,

also, the artificial penis--made of rosin, supple and (like the classical

instrument described by Herondas) rose-colored--is publicly sold and

widely used by women.[190]

It may be noticed that among non-European races it is among women, and

especially among those who are subjected to the excitement of a life

professionally devoted to some form of pleasure, that the use of the

artificial instruments of auto-erotism is chiefly practiced. The same is

markedly true in Europe. The use of an artificial penis in solitary sexual

gratification may be traced down from classic times, and doubtless

prevailed in the very earliest human civilization, for such an instrument

is said to be represented in old Babylonian sculptures, and it is referred

to by Ezekiel (Ch. XVI. v. 17). The Lesbian women are said to have used

such instruments, made of ivory or gold with silken stuffs and linen.

Aristophanes (_Lysistrata_, v. 109) speaks of the manufacture by the

Milesian women of a leather artificial penis, or olisbos. In the British

Museum is a vase representing a _hetaira_ holding such instruments, which,

as found at Pompeii, may be seen in the museum at Naples. One of the best

of Herondas's mimes, "The Private Conversation," presents a dialogue

between two ladies concerning a certain olisbos (or nbôn), which one of

them vaunts as a dream of delight. Through the Middle Ages (when from time

to time the clergy reprobated the use of such instruments[191]) they

continued to be known, and after the fifteenth century the references to

them became more precise. Thus Fortini, the Siennese novelist of the

sixteenth century, refers in his _Novelle dei Novizi_ (7th Day, Novella

XXXIX) to "the glass object filled with warm water which nuns use to calm

the sting of the flesh and to satisfy themselves as well as they can"; he

adds that widows and other women anxious to avoid pregnancy availed

themselves of it. In Elizabethan England, at the same time, it appears to

have been of similar character and Marston in his satires tells how Lucea

prefers "a glassy instrument" to "her husband's lukewarm bed." In

sixteenth century France, also, such instruments were sometimes made of

glass, and Brantôme refers to the godemiche; in eighteenth century Germany

they were called _Samthanse_, and their use, according to Heinse, as

quoted by Dühren, was common among aristocratic women. In England by that

time the dildo appears to have become common. Archemholtz states that

while in Paris they are only sold secretly, in London a certain Mrs.

Philips sold them openly on a large scale in her shop in Leicester Square.

John Bee in 1835, stating that the name was originally dil-dol, remarks

that their use was formerly commoner than it was in his day. In France,

Madame Gourdan, the most notorious brothel-keeper of the eighteenth

century, carried on a wholesale trade in _consolateurs_, as they were

called, and "at her death numberless letters from abbesses and simple nuns

were found among her papers, asking for a 'consolateur' to be sent."[192]

The modern French instrument is described by Gamier as of hardened red

rubber, exactly imitating the penis and capable of holding warm milk or

other fluid for injection at the moment of orgasm; the compressible

scrotum is said to have been first added in the eighteenth century.[193]

In Islam the artificial penis has reached nearly as high a development as

in Christendom. Turkish women use it and it is said to be openly sold in

Smyrna. In the harems of Zanzibar, according to Baumann, it is of

considerable size, carved out of ebony or ivory, and commonly bored

through so that warm water may be injected. It is here regarded as an Arab

invention.[194]

Somewhat similar appliances may be traced in all centres of civilization.

But throughout they appear to be frequently confined to the world of

prostitutes and to those women who live on the fashionable or

semi-artistic verge of that world. Ignorance and delicacy combine with a

less versatile and perverted concentration on the sexual impulse to

prevent any general recourse to such highly specialized methods of

solitary gratification.

On the other hand, the use, or rather abuse, of the ordinary objects and

implements of daily life in obtaining auto-erotic gratification, among the

ordinary population in civilized modern lands, has reached an

extraordinary degree of extent and variety we can only feebly estimate by

the occasional resulting mischances which come under the surgeon's hands,

because only a certain proportion of such instruments are dangerous. Thus

the banana seems to be widely used for masturbation by women, and appears

to be marked out for the purpose by its size and shape[195]; it is,

however, innocuous, and never comes under the surgeon's notice; the same

may probably be said of the cucumbers and other vegetables more especially

used by country and factory girls in masturbation; a lady living near

Vichy told Pouillet that she had often heard (and had herself been able to

verify the fact) that the young peasant women commonly used turnips,

carrots, and beet-roots. In the eighteenth century Mirabeau, in his

_Erotikca Biblion_ gave a list of the various objects used in convents

(which he describes as "vast theatres" of such practices) to obtain

solitary sexual excitement. In more recent years the following are a few

of the objects found in the vagina or bladder whence they could only be

removed by surgical interference[196]: Pencils, sticks of sealing-wax,

cotton-reels, hair-pins (and in Italy very commonly the bone-pins used in

the hair), bodkins, knitting-needles, crochet-needles, needle-cases,

compasses, glass stoppers, candles, corks, tumblers, forks, tooth-picks,

toothbrushes, pomade-pots (in a case recorded by Schroeder with a

cockchafer inside, a makeshift substitute for the Japanese _rin-no-tama_),

while in one recent English case a full-sized hen's egg was removed from

the vagina of a middle-aged married woman. More than nine-tenths of the

foreign bodies found in the female bladder or urethra are due to

masturbation. The age of the individuals in whom such objects have been

found is usually from 17 to 30, but in a few cases they have been found in

girls below 14, infrequently in women between 40 and 50; the large

objects, naturally, are found chiefly in the vagina, and in married

women.[197]

Hair-pins have, above all, been found in the female bladder with special

frequency; this point is worth some consideration as an illustration of

the enormous frequency of this form of auto-erotism. The female urethra is

undoubtedly a normal centre of sexual feeling, as Pouillet pointed out

many years ago; a woman medical correspondent, also, writes that in some

women the maximum of voluptuous sensation is at the vesical sphincter or

orifice, though not always so limited. E.H. Smith, indeed, considers that

"the urethra is the part in which the orgasm occurs," and remarks that in

sexual excitement mucus always flows largely from the urethra.[198] It

should be added that when once introduced the physiological mechanism of

the bladder apparently causes the organ to tend to "swallow" the foreign

object. Yet for every case in which the hair-pin disappears and is lost

in the bladder, from carelessness or the oblivion of the sexual spasm,

there must be a vast number of cases in which the instrument is used

without any such unfortunate result. There is thus great significance in

the frequency with which cases of hair-pin in the bladder are strewn

through the medical literature of all countries.

In 1862, a German surgeon found the accident so common that he invented a

special instrument for extracting hair-pins from the female bladder, as,

indeed, Italian and French surgeons have also done. In France, Denucé, of

Bordeaux, came to the conclusion that hair-pin in the bladder is the

commonest result of masturbation as known to the surgeon. In England cases

are constantly being recorded. Lawson Tait, stating that most cases of

stone in the bladder in women are due to the introduction of a foreign

body, very often a hair-pin, adds: "I have removed hair-pins encrusted

with phosphates from ten different female bladders, and not one of the

owners of these bladders would give any account of the incident."[199]

Stokes, again, records that during four years he had four cases of

hair-pin in the female urethra.[200] In New York one physician met with

four cases in a short experience.[201] In Switzerland Professor Reverdin

had a precisely similar experience.[202]

There is, however, another class of material objects, widely employed for

producing physical auto-erotism, which in the nature of things never

reaches the surgeon. I refer to the effects that, naturally or

unnaturally, may be produced by many of the objects and implements of

daily life that do not normally come in direct contact with the sexual

organs. Children sometimes, even when scarcely more than infants, produce

sexual excitement by friction against the corner of a chair or other piece

of furniture, and women sometimes do the same.[203] Guttceit, in Russia,

knew women who made a large knot in their chemises to rub against, and

mentions a woman who would sit on her naked heel and rub it against her.

Girls in France, I am informed, are fond of riding on the

_chevaux-de-bois_, or hobby-horses, because of the sexual excitement thus

aroused; and that the sexual emotions play a part in the fascination

exerted by this form of amusement everywhere is indicated by the ecstatic

faces of its devotees.[204] At the temples in some parts of Central India,

I am told, swings are hung up in pairs, men and women swinging in these

until sexually excited; during the months when the men in these districts

have to be away from home the girls put up swings to console themselves

for the loss of their husbands.

It is interesting to observe the very wide prevalence of

swinging, often of a religious or magic character, and the

evident sexual significance underlying it, although this is not

always clearly brought out. Groos, discussing the frequency of

swinging (_Die Spiele der Menschen_, p. 114) refers, for

instance, to the custom of the Gilbert Islanders for a young man

to swing a girl from a coco palm, and then to cling on and swing

with her. In ancient Greece, women and grown-up girls were fond

of see-saws and swings. The Athenians had, indeed, a swinging

festival (Athenæus, Bk. XIV, Ch. X). Songs of a voluptuous

character, we gather from Athenæus, were sung by the women at

this festival. J.G. Frazer (_The Golden Bough_, vol. ii, note A,

"Swinging as a Magical Rite") discusses the question, and brings

forward instances in which men, or, especially, women swing. "The

notion seems to be," he states, "that the ceremony promotes

fertility, whether in the vegetable or in the animal kingdom;

though why it should be supposed to do so, I confess myself

unable to explain" (loc. cit., p. 450). The explanation seems,

however, not far to seek, in view of the facts quoted above, and

Frazer himself refers to the voluptuous character of the songs

sometimes sung.

Even apart from actual swinging of the whole body, a swinging

movement may suffice to arouse sexual excitement, and may,--at

all events, in women,--constitute an essential part of methods of

attaining solitary sexual gratification. Kiernan thus describes

the habitual auto-erotic procedure of a young American woman:

"The patient knelt before a chair, let her elbows drop on its

seat, grasping the arms with a firm grip, then commenced a

swinging, writhing motion, seeming to fix her pelvis, and moving

her trunk and limbs. The muscles were rigid, the face took on a

passionate expression; the features were contorted, the eyes

rolled, the teeth were set, and the lips compressed, while the

cheeks were purple. The condition bore a striking resemblance to

the passional stage of grand hysteria. The reveling took only a

moment to commence, but lasted a long time. Swaying induced a

pleasurable sensation, accompanied with a feeling of suction upon

the clitoris. Almost immediately after, a sensation of bursting,

caused by discharge from the vulvo-vaginal glands, occurs,

followed by a rapture prolonged for an indefinite time." The

accompanying sexual imagery is so vivid as almost to become

hallucinatory. (J.G. Kiernan, "Sex Transformation and Psychic

Impotence," _American Journal of Dermatology_, vol. ix, No. 2.)

Somewhat similarly sensations of sexual character are sometimes

experienced by boys when climbing up a pole. It is not even necessary that

there should be direct external contact with the sexual organs, and Howe

states that gymnastic swinging poles around which boys swing while

supporting the whole weight on the hands, may suffice to produce sexual

excitement.

Several writers have pointed out that riding, especially in women, may

produce sexual excitement and orgasm.[205] It is well-known, also, that

both in men and women the vibratory motion of a railway-train frequently

produces a certain degree of sexual excitement, especially when sitting

forward. Such excitement may remain latent and not become specifically

sexual.[206] I am not aware that this quality of railway traveling has

ever been fostered as a sexual perversion, but the sewing-machine has

attracted considerable attention on account of its influence in exciting

auto-erotic manifestations. The early type of sewing-machine, especially,

was of very heavy character and involved much up and down movement of the

legs; Langdon Down pointed out many years ago that this frequently

produced great sexual erethism which led to masturbation.[207] According

to one French authority, it is a well-recognized fact that to work a

sewing-machine with the body in a certain position produces sexual

excitement leading to the orgasm. The occurrence of the orgasm is

indicated to the observer by the machine being worked for a few seconds

with uncontrollable rapidity. This sound is said to be frequently heard in

large French workrooms, and it is part of the duty of the superintendents

of the rooms to make the girls sit properly.[208]

"During a visit which I once paid to a manufactory of military

clothing," Pouillet writes, "I witnessed the following scene. In

the midst of the uniform sound produced by some thirty

sewing-machines, I suddenly heard one of the machines working

with much more velocity than the others. I looked at the person

who was working it, a brunette of 18 or 20. While she was

automatically occupied with the trousers she was making on the

machine, her face became animated, her mouth opened slightly, her

nostrils dilated, her feet moved the pedals with constantly

increasing rapidity. Soon I saw a convulsive look in her eyes,

her eyelids were lowered, her face turned pale and was thrown

backward; hands and legs stopped and became extended; a

suffocated cry, followed by a long sigh, was lost in the noise of

the workroom. The girl remained motionless a few seconds, drew

out her handkerchief to wipe away the pearls of sweat from her

forehead, and, after casting a timid and ashamed glance at her

companions, resumed her work. The forewoman, who acted as my

guide, having observed the direction of my gaze, took me up to

the girl, who blushed, lowered her face, and murmured some

incoherent words before the forewoman had opened her mouth, to

advise her to sit fully on the chair, and not on its edge.

"As I was leaving, I heard another machine at another part of the

room in accelerated movement. The forewoman smiled at me, and

remarked that that was so frequent that it attracted no notice.

It was specially observed, she told me, in the case of young

work-girls, apprentices, and those who sat on the edge of their

seats, thus much facilitating friction of the labia."

In cases where the sewing-machine does not lead to direct self-excitement

it has been held, as by Fothergill,[209] to predispose to frequency of

involuntary sexual orgasm during sleep, from the irritation set up by the

movement of the feet in the sitting posture during the day. The essential

movement in working the sewing-machine is the flexion and extension of the

ankle, but the muscles of the thighs are used to maintain the feet firmly

on the treadle, the thighs are held together, and there is a considerable

degree of flexion or extension of the thighs on the trunk; by a special

adjustment of the body, and sometimes perhaps merely in the presence of

sexual hyperæsthesia, it is thus possible to act upon the sexual organs;

but this is by no means a necessary result of using the sewing-machine,

and inquiry of various women, with well-developed sexual feelings, who are

accustomed to work the treadle, has not shown the presence of any tendency

in this direction.

Sexual irritation may also be produced by the bicycle in women. Thus,

Moll[210] remarks that he knows many married women, and some unmarried,

who experience sexual excitement when cycling; in several cases he has

ascertained that the excitement is carried as far as complete orgasm. This

result cannot, however, easily happen unless the seat is too high, the

peak in contact with the organs, and a rolling movement is adopted; in the

absence of marked hyperæsthesia these results are only effected by a bad

seat or an improper attitude, the body during cycling resting under proper

conditions on the buttocks, and the work being mainly done by the muscles

of the thighs and legs which control the ankles, flexion of the thigh on

the pelvis being very small. Most medical authorities on cycling are of

opinion that when cycling leads to sexual excitement the fault lies more

with the woman than with the machine. This conclusion does not appear to

me to be absolutely correct. I find on inquiry that with the old-fashioned

saddle, with an elevated peak rising toward the pubes, a certain degree of

sexual excitement, not usually producing the orgasm (but, as one lady

expressed it, making one feel quite ready for it), is fairly common among

women. Lydston finds that irritation of the genital organs may

unquestionably be produced in both males and females by cycling. The

aggravation of hæmorrhoids sometimes produced by cycling indicates also

the tendency to local congestion. With the improved flat saddles, however,

constructed with more definite adjustment to the anatomical formation of

the parts, this general tendency is reduced to a negligible minimum.

Reference may be made at this point to the influence of tight-lacing. This

has been recognized by gynæcologists as a factor of sexual excitement and

a method of masturbation.[211] Women who have never worn corsets sometimes

find that, on first putting them on, sexual feeling is so intensified that

it is necessary to abandon their use.[212] The reason of this (as Siebert

points out in his _Buch für Eltern_) seems to be that the corset both

favors pelvic congestion and at the same time exerts a pressure on the

abdominal muscles which brings them into the state produced during coitus.

It is doubtless for the same reason that, as some women have found, more

distension of the bladder is possible without corsets than with them.

In a further class of cases no external object whatever is used to procure

the sexual orgasm, but the more or less voluntary pressure of the thighs

alone is brought to bear upon the sexual regions. It is done either when

sitting or standing, the thighs being placed together and firmly crossed,

and the pelvis rocked so that the sexual organs are pressed against the

inner and posterior parts of the thighs.[213] This is sometimes done by

men, and is fairly common among women, especially, according to

Martineau,[214] among those who sit much, such as dressmakers and

milliners, those who use the sewing-machine, and those who ride. Vedeler

remarks that in his experience in Scandinavia, thigh-friction is the

commonest form of masturbation in women. The practice is widespread, and a

medical correspondent in India tells me of a Brahmin widow who confessed

to this form of masturbation. I am told that in London Board Schools, at

the present time, thigh-rubbing is not infrequent among the girl scholars;

the proportion mentioned in one school was about ten per cent, of the

girls over eleven; the thigh-rubbing is done more or less openly and is

interpreted by the uninitiated as due merely to a desire to relieve the

bladder. It is found in female infants. Thus, Townsend records the case of

an infant, 8 months old, who would cross her right thigh over the left,

close her eyes and clench her fists; after a minute or two there would be

complete relaxation, with sweating and redness of face; this would occur

about once a week or oftener; the child was quite healthy, with no

abnormal condition of the genital organs.[215] The frequency of

thigh-friction among women as a form of masturbation is due to the fact

that it is usually acquired innocently and it involves no indecorum. Thus

Soutzo reports the case of a girl of 12 who at school, when having to wait

her turn at the water-closet, for fear of wetting herself would put her

clothes between her legs and press her thighs together, moving them

backwards and forwards in the effort to control the bladder; she

discovered that a pleasurable sensation was thus produced and acquired the

habit of practicing the manoeuvre for its own sake; at the age of 17 she

began to vary it in different ways; thus she would hang from a tree with

her legs swinging and her chemise pressed between her thighs which she

would rub together.[216] Thigh-friction in some of its forms is so

comparatively decorous a form of masturbation that it may even be

performed in public places; thus, a few years ago, while waiting for a

train at a station on the outskirts of a provincial town, I became aware

of the presence of a young woman, sitting alone on a seat at a little

distance, whom I could observe unnoticed. She was leaning back with legs

crossed, swinging the crossed foot vigorously and continuously; this

continued without interruption for some ten minutes after I first observed

her; then the swinging movement reached a climax; she leant still further

back, thus bringing the sexual region still more closely in contact with

the edge of the bench and straightened and stiffened her body and legs in

what appeared to be a momentary spasm; there could be little doubt as to

what had taken place. A few moments later she slowly walked from her

solitary seat into the waiting-room and sat down among the other waiting

passengers, quite still now and with uncrossed legs, a pale quiet young

woman, possibly a farmer's daughter, serenely unconscious that her

manoeuvre had been detected, and very possibly herself ignorant of its

true nature.

There are many other forms in which the impulse of auto-erotism presents

itself. Dancing is often a powerful method of sexual excitement, not only

among civilized but among savage peoples, and Zache describes the erotic

dances of Swaheli women as having a masturbatory object.[217] Stimulation

of the nates is a potent adjuvant to the production of self-excitement,

and self-flagellation with rods, etc., is practiced by some individuals,

especially young women.[218] Urtication is another form of this

stimulation; Reverdin knew a young woman who obtained sexual gratification

by flogging herself with chestnut burrs, and it is stated that in some

parts of France (departments of the Ain and Côte d'Or) it is not uncommon

for young girls to masturbate by rubbing the leaves of the _Linaria

cymbalaria_ (here called "pinton" or "timbarde") on to the sexual parts,

thus producing a burning sensation.[219] Stimulation of the mamma,

normally an erogenous centre in women, may occasionally serve as a method

for obtaining auto-erotic satisfaction, including the orgasm, in both

sexes. I have been told of a case in a man, and a medical correspondent in

India informs me that he knows a Eurasian woman, addicted to masturbation,

who can only obtain the orgasm by rubbing the genitals with one hand while

with the other she rubs and finally squeezes her breasts. The tactile

stimulation even of regions of the body which are not normally erogenous

zones in either sex may sometimes lead on to sexual excitement;

Hirschsprung, as well as Freud, believes that this is often the case as

regards finger-sucking and toe-sucking in infancy. Even stroking the chin,

remarks Debreyne, may produce a pollution.[220] Taylor refers to the case

of a young woman of 22, who was liable to attacks of choreic movements of

the hands which would terminate in alternately pressing the middle finger

on the tip of the nose and the tragus of the ear, when a "far-away,

pleased expression" would appear on her face; she thus produced sexual

excitement and satisfaction. She had no idea of wrong-doing and was

surprised and ashamed when she realized the nature of her act.[221]

Most of the foregoing examples of auto-erotism, are commonly included, by

no means correctly, under the heading of "masturbation." There are,

however, a vast number of people, possessing strong sexual emotions and

living a solitary life, who experience, sometimes by instinct and

sometimes on moral grounds, a strong repugnance for these manifestations

of auto-erotism. As one highly intelligent lady writes: "I have sometimes

wondered whether I could produce it (complete sexual excitement)

mechanically, but I have a curious unreasonable repugnance to trying the

experiment. It would materialize it too much." The same repugnance may be

traced in the tendency to avoid, so far as possible, the use of the hands.

It is quite common to find this instinctive unreasoning repugnance among

women, a healthy repugnance, not founded on any moral ground. In men the

same repugnance exists, more often combined with, or replaced by, a very

strong moral and æsthetic objection to such practices. But the presence of

such a repugnance, however invincible, is very far from carrying us

outside the auto-erotic field. The production of the sexual orgasm is not

necessarily dependent on any external contact or voluntary mechanical

cause.

As an example, though not of specifically auto-erotic manifestations, I

may mention the case of a man of 57, a somewhat eccentric preacher, etc.,

who writes: "My whole nature goes out so to some persons, and they thrill

and stir me so that I have an emission while sitting by them with no

thought of sex, only the gladness of soul found its way out thus, and a

glow of health suffused the whole body. There was no spasmodic conclusion,

but a pleasing gentle sensation as the few drops of semen passed." (In

reality, no doubt, not semen, but urethral fluid.) This man's condition

may certainly be considered somewhat morbid; he is attracted to both men

and women, and the sexual impulse seems to be irritable and weak; but a

similar state of things exists so often in women, no doubt due to sexual

repression, and in individuals who are in a general state of normal and

good health, that in these it can scarcely be called morbid. Brooding on

sexual images, which the theologians termed _delectatio morosa_, may lead

to spontaneous orgasm in either sex, even in perfectly normal persons.

Hammond described as a not uncommon form of "psychic coitus," a condition

in which the simple act of imagination alone, in the presence of the

desired object, suffices to produce orgasm. In some public conveyance,

theatre, or elsewhere, the man sees a desirable woman and by concentrating

his attention on her person and imagining all the stages of intimacy he

quickly succeeds in producing orgasm.[222] Niceforo refers to an Italian

work-girl of 14 who could obtain ejaculation of mucus four times a day, in

the workroom in the presence of the other girls, without touching herself

or moving her body, by simply thinking of sexual things.[223]

If the orgasm occurs spontaneously, without the aid of mental impressions,

or any manipulations _ad hoc_, though under such conditions it ceases to

be sinful from the theological standpoint, it certainly ceases also to be

normal. Sérieux records the case of a somewhat neurotic woman of 50, who

had been separated from her husband for ten years, and since lived a

chaste life; at this age, however, she became subject to violent crises of

sexual orgasm, which would come on without any accompaniment of voluptuous

thoughts. MacGillicuddy records three cases of spontaneous orgasm in women

coming under his notice.[224] Such crises are frequently found in both men

and women, who, from moral reasons, ignorance, or on other grounds are

restrained from attaining the complete sexual orgasm, but whose sexual

emotions are, literally, continually dribbling from them. Schrenck-Notzing

knows a lady who is spontaneously sexually excited on hearing music or

seeing pictures without anything lascivious in them; she knows nothing of

sexual relationships. Another lady is sexually excited on seeing beautiful

and natural scenes, like the sea; sexual ideas are mixed up in her mind

with these things, and the contemplation of a specially strong and

sympathetic man brings the orgasm on in about a minute. Both these ladies

"masturbate" in the streets, restaurants, railways, theatres, without

anyone perceiving it.[225] A Brahmin woman informed a medical

correspondent in India that she had distinct though feeble orgasm, with

copious outflow of mucus, if she stayed long near a man whose face she

liked, and this is not uncommon among European women. Evidently under such

conditions there is a state of hyperæsthetic weakness. Here, however, we

are passing the frontiers of strictly auto-erotic phenomena.

_Delectatio morosa_, as understood by the theologians, is

distinct from desire, and also distinct from the definite

intention of effecting the sexual act, although it may lead to

those things. It is the voluntary and complacent dallying in

imagination with voluptuous thoughts, when no effort is made to

repel them. It is, as Aquinas and others point out, constituted

by this act of complacent dallying, and has no reference to the

duration of the imaginative process. Debreyne, in his

_Moechialogie_ (pp. 149-163), deals fully with this question, and

quotes the opinions of theologians. I may add that in the early

Penitentials, before the elaboration of Catholic theology, the

voluntary emission of semen through the influence of evil

thoughts, was recognized as a sin, though usually only if it

occurred in church. In Egbert's Penitential of the eighth or

ninth century (cap. IX, 12), the penance assigned for this

offence in the case of a deacon, is 25 days; in the case of a

monk, 30 days; a priest, 40 days; a bishop, 50. (Haddon and

Stubbs, _Councils and Ecclesiastical Documents_, vol. iii, p.

426.)

The frequency of spontaneous orgasm in women seems to have been

recognized in the seventeenth century. Thus, Schurig

(_Syllepsilogia_, p. 4), apparently quoting Riolan, states that

some women are so wanton that the sight of a handsome man, or of

their lover, or speech with such a one, will cause them to

ejaculate their semen.

There is, however, a closely allied, and, indeed, overlapping form of

auto-erotism which may be considered here: I mean that associated with

revery, or day-dreaming. Although this is a very common and important

form of auto-erotism, besides being in a large proportion of cases the

early stage of masturbation, it appears to have attracted little

attention.[226] The day-dream has, indeed, been studied in its chief form,

in the "continued story," by Mabel Learoyd, of Wellesley College. The

continued story is an imagined narrative, more or less peculiar to the

individual, by whom it is cherished with fondness, and regarded as an

especially sacred mental possession, to be shared only, if at all, with

very sympathizing friends. It is commoner among girls and young women than

among boys and young men; among 352 persons of both sexes, 47 per cent.

among the women and only 14 per cent. among the men, have any continued

story. The starting-point is an incident from a book, or, more usually,

some actual experience, which the subject develops; the subject is nearly

always the hero or the heroine of the story. The growth of the story is

favored by solitude, and lying in bed before going to sleep is the time

specially sacred to its cultivation.[227] No distinct reference, perhaps

naturally enough, is made by Miss Learoyd to the element of sexual emotion

with which these stories are often strongly tinged, and which is

frequently their real motive. Though by no means easy to detect, these

elaborate and more or less erotic day-dreams are not uncommon in young

men and especially in young women. Each individual has his own particular

dream, which is always varying or developing, but, except in very

imaginative persons, to no great extent. Such a day-dream is often founded

on a basis of pleasurable personal experience, and develops on that basis.

It may involve an element of perversity, even though that element finds no

expression in real life. It is, of course, fostered by sexual abstinence;

hence its frequency in young women. Most usually there is little attempt

to realize it. It does not necessarily lead to masturbation, though it

often causes some sexual congestion or even spontaneous sexual orgasm. The

day-dream is a strictly private and intimate experience, not only from its

very nature, but also because it occurs in images which the subject finds

great difficulty in translating into language, even when willing to do so.

In other cases it is elaborately dramatic or romantic in character, the

hero or heroine passing through many experiences before attaining the

erotic climax of the story. This climax tends to develop in harmony with

the subject's growing knowledge or experience; at first, merely a kiss, it

may develop into any refinement of voluptuous gratification. The day-dream

may occur either in normal or abnormal persons. Rousseau, in his

_Confessions_, describes such dreams, in his case combined with masochism

and masturbation. A distinguished American novelist, Hamlin Garland, has

admirably described in _Rose of Dutcher's Coolly_ the part played in the

erotic day-dreams of a healthy normal girl at adolescence by a

circus-rider, seen on the first visit to a circus, and becoming a majestic

ideal to dominate the girl's thoughts for many years.[228]

Raffalovich[229] describes the process by which in sexual inverts the

vision of a person of the same sex, perhaps seen in the streets or the

theatre, is evoked in solitary reveries, producing a kind of "psychic

onanism," whether or not it leads on to physical manifestations.

Although day-dreaming of this kind has at present been very little

studied, since it loves solitude and secrecy, and has never been counted

of sufficient interest for scientific inquisition, it is really a process

of considerable importance, and occupies a large part of the auto-erotic

field. It is frequently cultivated by refined and imaginative young men

and women who lead a chaste life and would often be repelled by

masturbation. In such persons, under such circumstances, it must be

considered as strictly normal, the inevitable outcome of the play of the

sexual impulse. No doubt it may often become morbid, and is never a

healthy process when indulged in to excess, as it is liable to be by

refined young people with artistic impulses, to whom it is in the highest

degree seductive and insidious.[230] As we have seen, however,

day-dreaming is far from always colored by sexual emotion; yet it is a

significant indication of its really sexual origin that, as I have been

informed by persons of both sexes, even in these apparently non-sexual

cases it frequently ceases altogether on marriage.

Even when we have eliminated all these forms of auto-erotic activity,

however refined, in which the subject takes a voluntary part, we have

still left unexplored an important portion of the auto-erotic field, a

portion which many people are alone inclined to consider normal: sexual

orgasm during sleep. That under conditions of sexual abstinence in healthy

individuals there must inevitably be some auto-erotic manifestations

during waking life, a careful study of the facts compels us to believe.

There can be no doubt, also, that, under the same conditions, the

occurrence of the complete orgasm during sleep with, in men, seminal

emissions, is altogether normal. Even Zeus himself, as Pausanias has

recorded, was liable to such accidents: a statement which, at all events,

shows that to the Greek mind there was nothing derogatory in such an

occurrence.[231] The Jews, however, regarded it as an impurity,[232] and

the same idea was transmitted to the Christian church and embodied in the

word _pollutio_, by which the phenomenon was designated in ecclesiastical

phraseology.[233] According to Billuart and other theologians, pollution

in sleep is not sin, unless voluntarily caused; if, however, it begins in

sleep, and is completed in the half-waking state, with a sense of

pleasure, it is a venial sin. But it seems allowable to permit a nocturnal

pollution to complete itself on awaking, if it occurs without intention;

and St. Thomas even says "_Si pollutio placeat ut naturæ exoneratio vel

alleviatio peccatum non creditur_."

Notwithstanding the fair and logical position of the more

distinguished Latin theologians, there has certainly been a

widely prevalent belief in Catholic countries that pollution

during sleep is a sin. In the "Parson's Tale," Chaucer makes the

parson say: "Another sin appertaineth to lechery that cometh in

sleeping; and the sin cometh oft to them that be maidens, and eke

to them that be corrupt; and this sin men clepe pollution, that

cometh in four manners;" these four manners being (1) languishing

of body from rank and abundant humors, (2) infirmity, (3) surfeit

of meat and drink, and (4) villainous thoughts. Four hundred

years later, Madame Roland, in her _Mémoires Particulières_,

presented a vivid picture of the anguish produced in an innocent

girl's mind by the notion of the sinfulness of erotic dreams. She

menstruated first at the age of 14. "Before this," she writes, "I

had sometimes been awakened from the deepest sleep in a

surprising manner. Imagination played no part; I exercised it on

too many serious subjects, and my timorous conscience preserved

it from amusement with other subjects, so that it could not

represent what I would not allow it to seek to understand. But an

extraordinary effervescence aroused my senses in the heat of

repose, and, by virtue of my excellent constitution, operated by

itself a purification which was as strange to me as its cause.

The first feeling which resulted was, I know not why, a sort of

fear. I had observed in my _Philotée_, that we are not allowed to

obtain any pleasure from our bodies except in lawful marriage.

What I had experienced could be called a pleasure. I was then

guilty, and in a class of offences which caused me the most shame

and sorrow, since it was that which was most displeasing to the

Spotless Lamb. There was great agitation in my poor heart,

prayers and mortifications. How could I avoid it? For, indeed, I

had not foreseen it, but at the instant when I experienced it, I

had not taken the trouble to prevent it. My watchfulness became

extreme. I scrupulously avoided positions which I found specially

exposed me to the accident. My restlessness became so great that,

at last I was able to awake before the catastrophe. When I was

not in time to prevent it, I would jump out of bed, with naked

feet on to the polished floor, and with crossed arms pray to the

Saviour to preserve me from the wiles of the devil. I would then

impose some penance on myself, and I have carried out to the

letter what the prophet King probably only transmitted to us as a

figure of Oriental speech, mixing ashes with my bread and

watering it with my tears."

To the early Protestant mind, as illustrated by Luther, there was

something diseased, though not impure, in sexual excitement during sleep;

thus, in his _Table Talk_ Luther remarks that girls who have such dreams

should be married at once, "taking the medicine which God has given." It

is only of comparatively recent years that medical science has obtained

currency for the belief that this auto-erotic process is entirely normal.

Blumenbach stated that nocturnal emissions are normal.[234] Sir James

Paget declared that he had never known celibate men who had not such

emissions from once or twice a week to twice every three months, both

extremes being within the limits of good health, while Sir Lauder Brunton

considers once a fortnight or once a month about the usual frequency, at

these periods the emissions often following two nights in succession.

Rohleder believes that they may normally follow for several nights in

succession. Hammond considers that they occur about once a fortnight.[235]

Ribbing regards ten to fourteen days as the normal interval.[236]

Löwenfeld puts the normal frequency at about once a week;[237] this seems

to be nearer the truth as regards most fairly healthy young men. In proof

of this it is only necessary to refer to the exact records of healthy

young adults summarized in the study of periodicity in the present volume.

It occasionally happens, however, that nocturnal emissions are entirely

absent. I am acquainted with some cases. In other fairly healthy young men

they seldom occur except at times of intellectual activity or of anxiety

and worry.

Lately there has been some tendency for medical opinion to revert

to the view of Luther, and to regard sexual excitement during

sleep as a somewhat unhealthy phenomenon. Moll is a distinguished

advocate of this view. Sexual excitement during sleep is the

normal result of celibacy, but it is another thing to say that it

is, on that account, satisfactory. We might, then, Moll remarks,

maintain that nocturnal incontinence of urine is satisfactory,

since the bladder is thus emptied. Yet, we take every precaution

against this by insisting that the bladder shall be emptied

before going to sleep. (_Libido Sexualis_, Bd. I, p. 552.) This

remark is supported by the fact, to which I find that both men

and women can bear witness, that sexual excitement during sleep

is more fatiguing than in the waking state, though this is not an

invariable rule, and it is sometimes found to be refreshing. In

a similar way, Eulenburg (_Sexuale Neuropathie_, p. 55) states

that nocturnal emissions are no more normal than coughing or

vomiting.

Nocturnal emissions are usually, though not invariably, accompanied by

dreams of a voluptuous character in which the dreamer becomes conscious in

a more or less fantastic manner of the more or less intimate presence or

contact of a person of the opposite sex. It would seem, as a general rule,

that the more vivid and voluptuous the dream, the greater is the physical

excitement and the greater also the relief experienced on awakening.

Sometimes the erotic dream occurs without any emission, and not

infrequently the emission takes place after the dreamer has awakened.

The widest and most comprehensive investigation of erotic dreams

is that carried out by Gualino, in northern Italy, and based on

inquiries among 100 normal men--doctors, teachers, lawyers,

etc.--who had all had experience of the phenomenon. (L. Gualino,

"Il Sogno Erotico nell' Uomo Normale," _Rivista di Psicologia_,

Jan.-Feb., 1907.) Gualino shows that erotic dreams, with

emissions (whether or not seminal), began somewhat earlier than

the period of physical development as ascertained by Marro for

youths of the same part of northern Italy. Gualino found that all

his cases had had erotic dreams at the age of seventeen; Marro

found 8 per cent, of youths still sexually undeveloped at that

age, and while sexual development began at thirteen years, erotic

dreams began at twelve. Their appearance was preceded, in most

cases for some months, by erections. In 37 per cent, of the cases

there had been no actual sexual experiences (either masturbation

or intercourse); in 23 per cent, there had been masturbation; in

the rest, some form of sexual contact. The dreams are mainly

visual, tactual elements coming second, and the _dramatis

persona_ is either an unknown woman (27 per cent, cases), or only

known by sight (56 per cent.), and in the majority is, at all

events in the beginning, an ugly or fantastic figure, becoming

more attractive later in life, but never identical with the woman

loved during waking life. This, as Gualino points out, accords

with the general tendency for the emotions of the day to be

latent in sleep. Masturbation only formed the subject of the

dream in four cases. The emotional state in the pubertal stage,

apart from pleasure, was anxiety (37 per cent.), desire (17 per

cent.), fear (14 per cent.). In the adult stage, anxiety and fear

receded to 7 per cent, and 6 per cent., respectively.

Thirty-three of the subjects, as a result of sexual or general

disturbances, had had nocturnal emissions without dreams; these

were always found exhausting. Normally (in more than 90 per

cent.) erotic dreams are the most vivid of all dreams. In no case

was there knowledge of any monthly or other cyclic periodicity in

the occurrence of the manifestations. In 34 per cent, of cases,

they tended to occur very soon after sexual intercourse. In

numerous cases they were peculiarly frequent (even three in one

night) during courtship, when the young man was in the habit of

kissing and caressing his betrothed, but ceased after marriage.

It was not noted that position in bed or a full bladder exerted

any marked influence in the occurrence of erotic dreams;

repletion of the seminal vesicles is regarded as the main factor.

In Germany erotic dreams have been discussed by Volkelt (_Die

Traum-Phantasie_, 1875, pp. 78-82), and especially by Löwenfeld

(_Sexual-Probleme_, Oct., 1908), while in America, Stanley Hall

thus summarizes the general characteristics of erotic dreams in

men: "In by far the most cases, consciousness, even when the act

causes full awakening from sleep, finds only scattered images,

single words, gestures, and acts, many of which would perhaps

normally constitute no provocation. Many times the mental

activity seems to be remote and incidental, and the mind retains

in the morning nothing except, perhaps, a peculiar dress pattern,

the shape of a finger-nail, the back of a neck, the toss of a

head, the movement of a foot, or the dressing of the hair. In

such cases, these images stand out for a time with the

distinctness of a cameo, and suggest that the origin of erotic

fetichisms is largely to be found in sexual dreams. Very rarely

is there any imagery of the organs themselves, but the tendency

to irradiation is so strong as to re-enforce the suggestion of so

many other phenomena in this field, that nature designs this

experience to be long circuited, and that it may give a peculiar

ictus to almost any experience. When waking occurs just

afterward, it seems at least possible that there may be much

imagery that existed, but failed to be recalled to memory,

possibly because the flow of psychic impressions was over very

familiar fields, and this, therefore, was forgotten, while any

eruption into new or unwonted channels, stood out with

distinctness. All these psychic phenomena, although very

characteristic of man in his prime, are not so of the dreams of

dawning puberty, which are far more vivid." (G. Stanley Hall,

_Adolescence_, vol. i, p. 455.)

I may, further, quote the experience of an anonymous

contributor--a healthy and chaste man between 30 and 38 years of

age--to the _American Journal of Psychology_ ("Nocturnal

Emissions," Jan., 1904): "Legs and breasts often figured

prominently in these dreams, the other sexual parts, however,

very seldom, and then they turned out to be male organs in most

cases. There were but two instances of copulation dreamt. Girls

and young women were the, usual _dramatis personæ_, and,

curiously enough, often the aggressors. Sometimes the face or

faces were well known; sometimes, only once seen; sometimes,

entirely unknown. The orgasm occurs at the most erotic part of

the dream, the physical and psychical running parallel. This most

erotic or suggestive part of the dream was very often quite an

innocent looking incident enough. As, for example: while passing

a strange young woman, overtaken on the street, she calls after

me some question. At first, I pay no heed, but when she calls

again, I hesitate whether to turn back and answer or

not--emission. Again, walking beside a young woman, she said,

'Shall I take your arm?' I offered it, and she took it, entwining

her arm around it, and raising it high--emission. I could feel

stronger erection as she asked the question. Sometimes, a word

was enough; sometimes, a gesture. Once emission took place on my

noticing the young woman's diminished finger-nails. Another

example of fetichism was my being curiously attracted in a dream

by the pretty embroidered figure on a little girl's dress. As an

illustration of the strange metamorphoses that occur in dreams, I

one night, in my dream (I had been observing partridges in the

summer) fell in love with a partridge, which changed under my

caresses to a beautiful girl, who yet retained an indescribable

wild-bird innocence, grace, and charm--a sort of Undina!"

These experiences may be regarded as fairly typical of the erotic

dreams of healthy and chaste young men. The bird, for instance,

that changes into a woman while retaining some elements of the

bird, has been encountered in erotic dreams by other young men.

It is indeed remarkable that, as De Gubernatis observes, "the

bird is a well-known phallic symbol," while Maeder finds

("Interprétations de Quelques Rêves," _Archives de Psychologie_,

April, 1907) that birds have a sexual significance both in life

and in dreams. The appearance of male organs in the dream-woman

is doubtless due to the dreamer's greater familiarity with those

organs; but, though it occurs occasionally, it can scarcely be

said to be the rule in erotic dreams. Even men who have never had

connection with a woman, are quite commonly aware of the presence

of a woman's sexual organs in their erotic dreams.

Moll's comparison of nocturnal emissions of semen with nocturnal

incontinence of urine suggests an interesting resemblance, and at

the same time seeming contrast. In both cases we are concerned

with viscera which, when overfilled or unduly irritable,

spasmodically eject their contents during sleep. There is a

further resemblance which usually becomes clear when, as

occasionally happens, nocturnal incontinence of urine persists on

to late childhood or adolescence: both phenomena are frequently

accompanied by vivid dreams of appropriate character. (See e.g.

Ries, "Ueber Enuresis Nocturna," _Monatsschrift für

Harnkrankheiten und Sexuelle Hygiene_, 1904; A.P. Buchan, nearly

a century ago, pointed out the psychic element in the

experiences of young persons who wetted the bed, _Venus sine

Concubitu_, 1816, p. 47.) Thus, in one case known to me, a child

of seven, who occasionally wetted the bed, usually dreamed at the

same time that she wanted to make water, and was out of doors,

running to find a suitable spot, which she at last found, and, on

awaking, discovered that she had wetted the bed; fifteen years

later she still sometimes had similar dreams, which caused her

much alarm until, when thoroughly awake, she realized that no

accident had happened; these later dreams were not the result of

any actual strong desire to urinate. In another case with which I

am acquainted, a little girl of eight, after mental excitement or

indigestible meals, occasionally wetted the bed, dreaming that

she was frightened by some one running after her, and wetted

herself in consequence, after the manner of the Ganymede in the

eagle's clutch, as depicted by Rembrandt. These two cases, it may

be noted, belong to two quite different types. In the first case,

the full bladder suggests to imagination the appropriate actions

for relief, and the bladder actually accepts the imaginative

solution offered; it is, according to Fiorani's phrase,

"somnambulism of the bladder." In the other case, there is no

such somnambulism, but a psychic and nervous disturbance, not

arising in the bladder at all, irradiates convulsively, and

whether or not the bladder is overfull, attacks a vesical nervous

system which is not yet sufficiently well-balanced to withstand

the inflow of excitement. In children of somewhat nervous

temperament, manifestations of this kind may occur as an

occasional accident, up to about the age of seven or eight; and

thereafter, the nervous control of the bladder having become

firmly established, they cease to happen, the nervous energy

required to affect the bladder sufficing to awake the dreamer. In

very rare cases, however, the phenomenon may still occasionally

happen, even in adolescence or later, in individuals who are

otherwise quite free from it. This is most apt to occur in young

women even in waking life. In men it is probably extremely rare.

The erotic dream seems to differ flagrantly from the vesical

dream, in that it occurs in adult life, and is with difficulty

brought under control. The contrast is, however, very

superficial. When we remember that sexual activity only begins

normally at puberty, we realize that the youth of twenty is, in

the matter of sexual control, scarcely much older than in the

matter of vesical control he was at the age of six. Moreover, if

we were habitually, from our earliest years, to go to bed with a

full bladder, as the chaste man goes to bed with unrelieved

sexual system, it would be fully as difficult to gain vesical

control during sleep as it now is to gain sexual control.

Ultimately, such sexual control is attained; after the age of

forty, it seems that erotic dreams with emission become more and

more rare; either the dream occurs without actual emission,

exactly as dreams of urination occur in adults with full bladder,

or else the organic stress, with or without dreams, serves to

awaken the sleeper before any emission has occurred. But this

stage is not easily or completely attained. St. Augustine, even

at the period when he wrote his _Confessions_, mentions, as a

matter of course, that sexual dreams "not merely arouse pleasure,

but gain the consent of the will." (X. 41.) Not infrequently

there is a struggle in sleep, just as the hypnotic subject may

resist suggestions; thus, a lady of thirty-five dreamed a sexual

dream, and awoke without excitement; again she fell asleep, and

had another dream of sexual character, but resisted the tendency

to excitement, and again awoke; finally, she fell asleep and had

a third sexual dream, which was this time accompanied by the

orgasm. (This has recently been described also by Näcke, who

terms it _pollutio interrupta, Neurologisches Centralblatt_, Oct.

16, 1909; the corresponding voluntary process in the waking state

is described by Rohleder and termed _masturbatio interrupta,

Zeitschrift für Sexualwissenschaft_, Aug., 1908.) The factors

involved in the acquirement of vesical and sexual control during

sleep are the same, but the conditions are somewhat different.

There is a very intimate connection between the vesical and the

sexual spheres, as I have elsewhere pointed out (see e.g. in the

third volume of these _Studies_, "Analysis of the Sexual

Impulse"). This connection is psychic as well as organic. Both in

men and women, a full bladder tends to develop erotic dreams.

(See e.g. K.A. Scherner, _Das Leben des Traums_, 1861, pp. 187 et

seq.; Spitta also points out the connection between vesical and

erotic dreams, _Die Schlaf und Traumzustände_, 2d ed., 1882, pp.

250 et seq.) Raymond and Janet state (_Les Obscessions_, vol. ii,

p. 135) that nocturnal incontinence of urine, accompanied by

dreams of urination, may be replaced at puberty by masturbation.

In the reverse direction, Freud believes (_Monatsschrift für

Psychiatrie_, Bd. XVIII, p. 433) that masturbation plays a large

part in causing the bed-wetting of children who have passed the

age when that usually ceases, and he even finds that children are

themselves aware of the connection.

The diagnostic value of sexual dreams, as an indication of the

sexual nature of the subject when awake, has been emphasized by

various writers. (E.g., Moll, _Die Konträre Sexualempfindung_,

Ch. IX; Näcke, "Der Traum als feinstes Reagens für die Art des

sexuellen Empfindens," _Monatsschrift für Kriminalpsychologie_,

1905, p. 500.) Sexual dreams tend to reproduce, and even to

accentuate, those characteristics which make the strongest sexual

appeal to the subject when awake.

At the same time, this general statement has to be qualified,

more especially as regards inverted dreams. In the first place, a

young man, however normal, who is not familiar with the feminine

body when awake, is not likely to see it when asleep, even in

dreams of women; in the second place, the confusions and

combinations of dream imagery often tend to obliterate sexual

distinctions, however free from perversions the subjects may be.

Thus, a correspondent tells me of a healthy man, of very pure

character, totally inexperienced in sexual matters, and never

having seen a woman naked, who, in his sexual dreams, always sees

the woman with male organs, though he has never had any sexual

inclinations for men, and is much in love with a lady. The

confusions and associations of dream imagery, leading to abnormal

combinations, may be illustrated by a dream which once occurred

to me after reading Joest's account of how a young negress, whose

tattoo-marks he was sketching, having become bored, suddenly

pressed her hands to her breasts, spirting two streams of

lukewarm milk into his face, and ran away laughing; I dreamed of

a woman performing a similar action, not from her breasts,

however, but from a penis with which she was furnished. Again, by

another kind of confusion, a man dreams sexually that he is with

a man, although the figure of the partner revealed in the dream

is a woman. The following dream, in a normal man who had never

been, or wished to be, in the position shown by the dream, may be

quoted: "I dreamed that I was a big boy, and that a younger boy

lay close beside me, and that we (or, certainly, he) had seminal

emissions; I was complacently passive, and had a feeling of shame

when the boy was discovered. On awaking I found I had had no

emission, but was lying very close to my wife. The day before, I

had seen boys in a swimming-match." This was, it seems to me, an

example of dream confusion, and not an erotic inverted dream.

(Näcke also brings forward inverted dreams by normal persons; see

e.g. his "Beiträge zu den sexuellen Träumen," _Archiv für

Kriminal-Anthropologie_, Bd. XX, 1908, p. 366.)

So far as I have been able to ascertain, there seem to be, generally

speaking, certain differences in the manifestations of auto-erotism during

sleep in men and women which I believe to be not without psychological

significance. In men the phenomenon is fairly simple; it usually appears

about puberty continues at intervals of varying duration during sexual

life provided the individual is living chastely, and is generally, though

not always, accompanied by erotic dreams which lead up to the climax, its

occurrence being, to some extent, influenced by a variety of

circumstances: physical, mental, or emotional excitement, alcohol taken

before retiring, position in bed (as lying on the back), the state of the

bladder, sometimes the mere fact of being in a strange bed, and to some

extent apparently by the existence of monthly and yearly rhythms. On the

whole, it is a fairly definite and regular phenomenon which usually leaves

little conscious trace on awaking, beyond probably some sense of fatigue

and, occasionally, a headache. In women, however, the phenomena of

auto-erotism during sleep seem to be much more irregular, varied, and

diffused. So far as I have been able to make inquiries, it is the

exception rather than the rule for girls to experience definitely erotic

dreams about the period of puberty or adolescence.[238] Auto-erotic

phenomena during sleep in women who have never experienced the orgasm when

awake are usually of a very vague kind; while it is the rule in a chaste

youth for the orgasm thus to manifest itself, it is the exception in a

chaste girl. It is not, as a rule, until the orgasm has been definitely

produced in the waking state--under whatever conditions it may have been

produced--that it begins to occur during sleep, and even in a strongly

sexual woman living a repressed life it is often comparatively

infrequent.[239] Thus, a young medical woman who endeavors to deal

strenuously with her physical sexual emotions writes: "I sleep soundly,

and do not dream at all. Occasionally, but very rarely, I have had

sensations which awakened me suddenly. They can scarcely be called dreams,

for they are mere impulses, nothing connected or coherent, yet prompted, I

know, by sexual feeling. This is probably an experience common to all."

Another lady (with a restrained psycho-sexual tendency to be attracted to

both sexes), states that her first sexual sensations with orgasm were felt

in dreams at the age of 16, but these dreams, which she has now forgotten,

were not agreeable and not erotic; two or three years later spontaneous

orgasm began to occur occasionally when awake, and after this, orgasm

took place regularly once or twice a week in sleep, but still without

erotic dreams; she merely dreamt that the orgasm was occurring and awoke

as it took place.

It is possible that to the comparative rarity in chaste women of complete

orgasm during sleep, we may in part attribute the violence with which

repressed sexual emotion in women often manifests itself.[240] There is

thus a difference here between men and women which is of some significance

when we are considering the natural satisfaction of the sexual impulse in

chaste women.

In women, who have become accustomed to sexual intercourse, erotic dreams

of fully developed character occur, with complete orgasm and accompanying

relief--as may occasionally be the case in women who are not acquainted

with actual intercourse;[241] some women, however, even when familiar with

actual coitus, find that sexual dreams, though accompanied by emissions,

are only the symptoms of desire and do not produce actual relief.

Some interest attaches to cases in which young women, even girls at

puberty, experience dreams of erotic character, or at all events dream

concerning coitus or men in erection, although they profess, and almost

certainly with truth, to be quite ignorant of sexual phenomena. Several

such dreams of remarkable character have been communicated to me. One can

imagine that the psychologists of some schools would see in these dreams

the spontaneous eruption of the experiences of the race. I am inclined to

regard them as forgotten memories, such as we know to occur sometimes in

sleep. The child has somehow seen or heard of sexual phenomena and felt no

interest, and the memory may subsequently be aroused in sleep, under the

stimulation of new-born sexual sensations.

It is a curious proof of the ignorance which has prevailed in

recent times concerning the psychic sexual nature of women that,

although in earlier ages the fact that women are normally liable

to erotic dreams was fully recognized, in recent times it has

been denied, even by writers who have made a special study of the

sexual impulse in women. Eulenburg (_Sexuale Neuropathie_, 1895,

pp. 31, 79) appears to regard the appearances of sexual phenomena

during sleep, in women, as the result of masturbation. Adler, in

what is in many respects an extremely careful study of sexual

phenomena in women (_Die Mangelhafte Geschlechtsempfindung des

Weibes_, 1904, p. 130), boldly states that they do not have

erotic dreams. In 1847, E. Guibout ("Des Pollutions Involontaires

chez la Femme," _Union Médicale_, p. 260) presented the case of a

married lady who masturbated from the age of ten, and continued

the practice, even after her marriage at twenty-four, and at

twenty-nine began to have erotic dreams with emissions every few

nights, and later sometimes even several times a night, though

they ceased to be voluptuous; he believed the case to be the

first ever reported of such a condition in a woman. Yet,

thousands of years ago, the Indian of Vedic days recognized

erotic dreams in women as an ordinary and normal occurrence.

(Löwenfeld quotes a passage to this effect from the Oupnek'hat,

_Sexualleben und Nervenleiden_, 2d ed., p. 114.) Even savages

recognize the occurrence of erotic dreams in women as normal, for

the Papuans, for instance, believe that a young girl's first

menstruation is due to intercourse with the moon in the shape of

a man, the girl dreaming that a man is embracing her. (_Reports

Cambridge Expedition to Torres Straits_, vol. v., p. 206.) In the

seventeenth century, Rolfincius, in a well-informed study (_De

Pollutione Nocturna_, a Jena Inaugural Dissertation, 1667),

concluded that women experience such manifestations, and quotes

Aristotle, Galen, and Fernelius, in the same sense. Sir Thomas

Overbury, in his _Characters_, written in the early part of the

same century, describing the ideal milkmaid, says that "her

dreams are so chaste that she dare tell them," clearly implying

that It was not so with most women. The notion that women are not

subject to erotic dreams thus appears to be of comparatively

recent origin.

One of the most interesting and important characters by which the erotic

dreams of women--and, indeed, their dreams generally--differ from those of

men is in the tendency to evoke a repercussion on the waking life, a

tendency more rarely noted in men's erotic dreams, and then only to a

minor extent. This is very common, even in healthy and normal women, and

is exaggerated to a high degree in neurotic subjects, by whom the dream

may even be interpreted as a reality, and so declared on oath, a fact of

practical importance.

Hersman--having met with a case in which a school-girl with chorea, after

having dreamed of an assault, accused the principal of a school of

assault, securing his conviction--obtained the opinions of various

American alienists as to the frequency with which such dreams in unstable

mental subjects lead to delusions and criminal accusations. Dercum, H.C.

Wood, and Rohé had not personally met with such cases; Burr believed that

there was strong evidence "that a sexual dream may be so vivid as to make

the subject believe she has had sexual congress"; Kiernan knew of such

cases; C.H. Hughes, in persons with every appearance of sanity, had known

the erotic dreams of the night to become the erotic delusions of the day,

the patient protesting violently the truth of her story; while Hersman

reports the case[242] of a young lady in an asylum who had nightly

delusions that a medical officer visited her every night, and had to do

with her, coming up the hot-air flue. I am acquainted with a similar case

in a clever, but highly neurotic, young woman, who writes: "For years I

have been trying to stamp out my passional nature, and was beginning to

succeed when a strange thing happened to me last autumn. One night, as I

lay in bed, I felt an influence so powerful that a man seemed present with

me. I crimsoned with shame and wonder. I remember that I lay upon my back,

and marveled when the spell had passed. The influence, I was assured, came

from a priest whom I believed in and admired above everyone in the world.

I had never dreamed of love in connection with him, because I always

thought him so far above me. The influence has been upon me ever

since--sometimes by day and nearly always by night; from it I generally go

into a deep sleep, which lasts until morning. I am always much refreshed

when I awake. This influence has the best effect upon my life that

anything has ever had as regards health and mind. It is the knowledge that

I am loved _fittingly_ that makes me so indifferent to my future. What

worries me is that I sometimes wonder if I suffer from a nervous disorder

merely." The subject thus seemed to regard these occurrences as

objectively caused, but was sufficiently sane to wonder whether her

experiences were not due to mental disorder.[243]

Studies in the Psychology of Sex, Volume 1 The Evolution of Modesty; The Phenomena of Sexual Periodicity; Auto-Erotism · 第 5 / 9 章