M. Lecoq shrugged his shoulders.

“You are an ass! Why, don’t you know that on the very day you were sent

for with the commissary to verify the robbery, you held--I do not say

certainly, but very probably held--in your great stupid hands the means

of knowing which key had been used when the money was stolen?”

“How! What!”

“You want to know, do you? I will tell you. Do you remember the scratch

you discovered on the safe-door? You were so struck by it, that you

exclaimed directly you saw it. You carefully examined it, and were

convinced that it was a fresh scratch, only a few hours old. You

thought, and rightly too, that this scratch was made at the time of the

theft. Now, with what was it made? Evidently with a key. That being

the case, you should have asked for the keys both of the banker and the

cashier. One of them would have had some particles of the hard green

paint sticking to it.”

Fanferlot listened with open mouth to this explanation. At the last

words, he violently slapped his forehead with his hand, and cried out:

“Imbecile! Imbecile!”

“You have rightly named yourself,” said M. Lecoq. “Imbecile! This proof

stares you right in the face, and you don’t see it! This scratch is the

sole and only clew to work the case upon, and you must go and lose the

traces of it. If I find the guilty party, it will be by means of this

scratch; and I am determined that I will find him.”

At a distance the Squirrel very bravely abused and defied M. Lecoq; but,

in his presence, he yielded to the influence which this extraordinary

man exercised upon all who approached him.

This exact information, these minute details of all his secret

movements, and even thoughts, so upset his mind that he could not think

where and how M. Lecoq had obtained them. Finally he said, humbly:

“You must have been looking up this case, patron?”

“Probably I have; but I am not infallible, and may have overlooked some

important evidence. Take a seat, and tell me all you know.”

M. Lecoq was not the man to be hoodwinked, so Fanferlot told the exact

truth, a rare thing for him to do. However as he reached the end of his

statement, a feeling of mortified vanity prevented his telling how he

had been fooled by Gypsy and the stout man.

Unfortunately for poor Fanferlot, M. Lecoq was always fully informed on

every subject in which he interested himself.

“It seems to me, Master Squirrel, that you have forgotten something. How

far did you follow the empty coach?”

Fanferlot blushed, and hung his head like a guilty school-boy.

“Oh, patron!” he cried, “and you know about that too! How could you

have----”

But a sudden idea flashed across his brain: he stopped short, bounded

off his chair, and cried:

“Oh! I know now: you were the large gentleman with red whiskers.”

His surprise gave so singular an expression to his face that M. Lecoq

could not restrain a smile.

“Then it was you,” continued the bewildered detective; “you were the

large gentleman at whom I stared, so as to impress his appearance upon

my mind, and I never recognized you! Patron, you would make a superb

actor, if you would go on the stage; but I was disguised, too--very well

disguised.”

“Very poorly disguised; it is only just to you that I should let you

know what a failure it was, Fanferlot. Do you think that a heavy beard

and a blouse are a sufficient transformation? The eye is the thing to be

changed--the eye! The art lies in being able to change the eye. That is

the secret.”

This theory of disguise explained why the lynx-eyed Lecoq never appeared

at the police-office without his gold spectacles.

“Then, patron,” said Fanferlot, clinging to his idea, “you have been

more successful than Mme. Alexandre; you have made the little girl

confess? You know why she leaves the Archangel, why she does not wait

for M. de Clameran, and why she bought calico dresses?”

“She is following my advice.”

“That being the case,” said the detective dejectedly, “there is nothing

left for me to do, but to acknowledge myself an ass.”

“No, Squirrel,” said M. Lecoq, kindly, “you are not an ass. You

merely did wrong in undertaking a task beyond your capacity. Have you

progressed one step since you started this affair? No. That shows that,

although you are incomparable as a lieutenant, you do not possess the

qualities of a general. I am going to present you with an aphorism;

remember it, and let it be your guide in the future: _A man can shine in

the second rank, who would be totally eclipsed in the first_.”

Never had Fanferlot seen his patron so talkative and good-natured.

Finding his deceit discovered, he had expected to be overwhelmed with

a storm of anger; whereas he had escaped with a little shower that had

cooled his brain. Lecoq’s anger disappeared like one of those heavy

clouds which threaten in the horizon for a moment, and then are suddenly

swept away by a gust of wind.

But this unexpected affability made Fanferlot feel uneasy. He was afraid

that something might be concealed beneath it.

“Do you know who the thief is, patron?”

“I know no more than you do, Fanferlot; and you seem to have made up

your mind, whereas I am still undecided. You declare the cashier to be

innocent, and the banker guilty. I don’t know whether you are right or

wrong. I started after you, and have only reached the preliminaries of

my search. I am certain of but one thing, and that is, that a scratch

was on the safe-door. That scratch is my starting-point.”

As he spoke, M. Lecoq took from his desk and unrolled an immense sheet

of drawing-paper.

On this paper was photographed the door of M. Fauvel’s safe. The

impression of every detail was perfect. There were the five movable

buttons with the engraved letters, and the narrow, projecting brass

lock: The scratch was indicated with great exactness.

“Now,” said M. Lecoq, “here is our scratch. It runs from top to bottom,

starting from the hole of the lock, diagonally, and, observe, from left

to right; that is to say, it terminates on the side next to the private

staircase leading to the banker’s apartments. Although very deep at the

key-hole, it ends off in a scarcely perceptible mark.”

“Yes, patron, I see all that.”

“Naturally you thought that this scratch was made by the person who took

the money. Let us see if you were right. I have here a little iron box,

painted with green varnish like M. Fauvel’s safe; here it is. Take a

key, and try to scratch it.”

“The deuce take it!” he said after several attempts, “this paint is

awfully hard to move!”

“Very hard, my friend, and yet that on the safe is still harder and

thicker. So you see the scratch you discovered could not have been made

by the trembling hand of a thief letting the key slip.”

“Sapristi!” exclaimed Fanferlot, stupefied: “I never should have thought

of that. It certainly required great force to make the deep scratch on

the safe.”

“Yes, but how was that force employed? I have been racking my brain

for three days, and only yesterday did I come to a conclusion. Let us

examine together, and see if our conjectures present enough chances of

probability to establish a starting-point.”

M. Lecoq abandoned the photograph, and, walking to the door

communicating with his bedroom, took the key from the lock, and, holding

it in his hand, said:

“Come here, Fanferlot, and stand by my side: there; very well. Now

suppose that I want to open this door, and you don’t want me to open

it; when you see me about to insert the key, what would be your first

impulse?”

“To put my hands on your arm, and draw it toward me so as to prevent

your introducing the key.”

“Precisely so. Now let us try it; go on.” Fanferlot obeyed; and the key

held by M. Lecoq, pulled aside from the lock, slipped along the door,

and traced upon it a diagonal scratch, from top to bottom, the exact

reproduction of the one in the photograph.

“Oh, oh, oh!” exclaimed Fanferlot in three different tones of

admiration, as he stood gazing in a revery at the door.

“Do you begin to understand now?” asked M. Lecoq.

“Understand, patron? Why, a child could understand it now. Ah, what a

man you are! I see the scene as if I had been present. Two persons were

present at the robbery; one wished to take the money, the other wished

to prevent its being taken. That is clear, that is certain.”

Accustomed to triumphs of this sort, M. Lecoq was much amused at

Fanferlot’s enthusiasm.

“There you go off, half-primed again,” he said, good-humoredly: “you

regard as sure proof a circumstance which may be accidental, and at the

most only probable.”

“No, patron, no! a man like you could not be mistaken: doubt no longer

exists.”

“That being the case, what deductions would you draw from our

discovery?”

“In the first place, it proves that I am correct in thinking the cashier

innocent.”

“How so?”

“Because, at perfect liberty to open the safe whenever he wished to

do so, it is not likely that he would have brought a witness when he

intended to commit the theft.”

“Well reasoned, Fanferlot. But on this supposition the banker would be

equally innocent: reflect a little.”

Fanferlot reflected, and all of his animation vanished.

“You are right,” he said in a despairing tone. “What can be done now?”

“Look for the third rogue, or rather the real rogue, the one who opened

the safe, and stole the notes, and who is still at large, while others

are suspected.”

“Impossible, patron--impossible! Don’t you know that M. Fauvel and his

cashier had keys, and they only? And they always kept these keys in

their pockets.”

“On the evening of the robbery the banker left his key in the

secretary.”

“Yes; but the key alone was not sufficient to open the safe; the word

also must be known.”

File No. 113 · 第 21 / 65 题