Butler, in his _Hudibras_, observes, in an oft-quoted passage, that

'Montaigne, playing with his cat,

Complains she thought him but an ass.'

And the annotator on this passage, in explanation, adds, that

'Montaigne in his Essays supposes his cat thought him a fool for

losing his time in playing with her;' but, under favour, this is a

misinterpretation of the essayist's sentiment, and something like a

libel on the capacity of both himself and cat. Montaigne's words

are: 'When I play with my cat, who knows whether I do not make her

more sport than she makes me? We mutually divert each other with our

play. If I have my hour to begin or refuse, so also has she hers.'

Nobody who has read the striking essay in which these words appear

could for a moment misconceive their author's meaning. He is

vindicating natural theology from the objections of some of its

opponents, and in the course of his argument he takes occasion to

dwell on the wonderful instincts, and almost rational sagacity of

the inferior animals. We must, however, lament that, although he

does full justice to the 'half-reasoning elephant,' to the aptitude

and fidelity of the dog, to the marvellous economical arrangements

of the bees, and even to the imitative capacity of the magpie, he

pays no higher tribute to the merits of the cat than that she is as

capable of being amused as himself, and like himself, too, has her

periods of gravity when recreative sports are distasteful. Her

social qualities he does not allude to, though he, so eminently

social himself, could scarcely have failed to appreciate them.

In this country, at this time, cats have superseded parlour

favourites decidedly less agreeable in their appearance, and

infinitely more mischievous in their habits. Writing in the

seventeenth century, Burton, in his _Anatomy of Melancholy_, remarks

that 'Turkey gentlewomen, that are perpetual prisoners, still mewed

up according to the custom of the place, have little else, beside

their household business or to play with their children, to drive

away time but to dally with their cats, which they have _in

delitiis_, as many of our ladies and gentlewomen use monkeys and

little dogs.' It is not the least merit of the cat that it has

banished from our sitting-rooms those frightful mimicries of

humanity--the monkey tribe; and as to the little dogs Tray, Blanch,

and Sweetheart, although we are not insensible to their many virtues

and utilities, we care not to see them sleeping on our hearth-rug,

or reposing beside our work-tables.

* * * * *

[Footnote 5: In the matter of fanaticism, the modern Egyptians, or

rather the inhabitants of Alexandria, seem hardly to have

degenerated from their ethnic 'forbears,' as we read in Mr J.A. St

John's travels the account of a serious insurrection which broke out

some years ago in that city, in consequence of certain Jews having

taken up the butcher's trade, and having slain the meat with a knife

having _three_ instead of _five nails_ in the handle!]

Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 419 Volume 17, New Series, January 10, 1852 · 第 8 / 18 题