PART II.

TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE

* Italics are denoted by underscores as in _italics_.

* Small caps are represented in upper case as in SMALL CAPS.

* Letter spaced Greek text is enclosed in tildes as in ~καὶ τὰ

λοιπά~.

* Footnotes have been renumbered. Each footnote is placed at the

end of the paragraph that includes its anchor.

* Obvious printer errors have been silently corrected, after

comparison with a later edition of this work. Greek text has

also been corrected after checking with this later edition and

with Perseus, when the reference was found.

* Original spelling, hyphenation and punctuation have been kept,

but variant spellings were made consistent when a predominant

usage was found.

* Nevetherless, no attempt has been made at normalizing proper

names. The author established at the beginning of the first

volume of this work some rules of transcription for proper names,

but neither he nor his publisher follow them consistently.

HISTORY OF GREECE.

BY

GEORGE GROTE, ESQ.

VOL. IV.

REPRINTED FROM THE SECOND LONDON EDITION.

NEW YORK:

HARPER & BROTHERS, PUBLISHERS.

329 AND 331 PEARL STREET.

1880.

CONTENTS.

VOL. IV.

PART II.

CONTINUATION OF HISTORICAL GREECE.

CHAPTER XXV.

ILLYRIANS, MACEDONIANS, PÆONIANS.

Different tribes of Illyrians. — Conflicts and contrast of

Illyrians with Greeks. — Epidamnus and Apollonia in relation to

the Illyrians. — Early Macedonians. — Their original seats. —

General view of the country which they occupied — eastward of

Pindus and Skardus. — Distribution and tribes of the Macedonians.

— Macedonians round Edessa — the leading portion of the nation. —

Pierians and Bottiæans — originally placed on the Thermaic gulf,

between the Macedonians and the sea. — Pæonians. — Argeian Greeks

who established the dynasty of Edessa — Perdikkas. — Talents for

command manifested by Greek chieftains over barbaric tribes. —

Aggrandizement of the dynasty of Edessa — conquests as far as

the Thermaic gulf, as well as over the interior Macedonians. —

Friendship between king Amyntas and the Peisistratids.

_pages_ 1-19

CHAPTER XXVI.

THRACIANS AND GREEK COLONIES IN THRACE.

Thracians — their numbers and abode. — Many distinct tribes, yet

little diversity of character. — Their cruelty, rapacity, and

military efficiency. — Thracian worship and character Asiatic.

— Early date of the Chalkidic colonies in Thrace. — Methônê the

earliest — about 720 B. C. — Several other small settlements

on the Chalkidic peninsula and its three projecting headlands.

— Chalkidic peninsula — Mount Athos. — Colonies in Pallênê, or

the westernmost of the three headlands. — In Sithonia, or the

middle headland. — In the headland of Athos — Akanthus, Stageira,

etc. — Greek settlements east of the Strymôn in Thrace. — Island

of Thasus. — Thracian Chersonesus. — Perinthus, Selymoria, and

Byzantium. — Grecian settlements on the Euxine, south of the

Danube. — Lemnos and Imbros. 20-28

CHAPTER XXVII.

KYRENE AND BARKA. — HESPERIDES.

First voyages of the Greeks to Libya. — Foundation of Kyrênê.

— Founded by Battus from the island of Thêra. — Colony first

settled in the island of Platea — afterwards removed to Kyrênê.

— Situation of Kyrênê. — Fertility, produce, and prosperity. —

Libyan tribes near Kyrênê. — Extensive dominion of Kyrênê and

Barka over the Libyans. — Connection of the Greek colonies with

the Nomads of Libya. — Manners of the Libyan Nomads. — Mixture

of Greeks and Libyan inhabitants at Kyrênê. — Dynasty of Battus,

Arkesilaus, Battus the Second, at Kyrênê — fresh colonists from

Greece. — Disputes with the native Libyans. — Arkesilaus the

Second, prince of Kyrênê — misfortunes of the city — foundation

of Barka. — Battus the Third, a lame man — reform by Demônax,

who takes away the supreme power from the Battiads. — New

emigration — restoration of the Battiad Arkesilaus the Third. —

Oracle limiting the duration of the Battiad dynasty. — Violences

at Kyrênê under Arkesilaus the Third. — Arkesilaus sends his

submission to Kambysês, king of Persia. — Persian expedition from

Egypt against Barka — Pheretimê, mother of Arkesilaus. — Capture

of Barka by perfidy — cruelty of Pheretimê. — Battus the Fourth

and Arkesilaus the Fourth — final extinction of the dynasty about

460-450 B. C. — Constitution of Demônax not durable. 29-49

CHAPTER XXVIII.

PAN-HELLENIC FESTIVALS — OLYMPIC, PYTHIAN, NEMEAN, AND ISTHMIAN.

Want of grouping and unity in the early period of Grecian

history. — New causes, tending to favor union, begin after

560 B. C. — no general war between 776 and 560 B. C. known to

Thucydidês. — Increasing disposition to religious, intellectual,

and social union. — Reciprocal admission of cities to the

religious festivals of each other. — Early splendor of the

Ionic festival at Delos — its decline. — Olympic games — their

celebrity and long continuance. — Their gradual increase —

new matches introduced. — Olympic festival — the first which

passes from a local to a Pan-Hellenic character. — Pythian

games, or festival. — Early state and site of Delphi. — Phocian

town of Krissa. — Kirrha, the seaport of Krissa. — Growth of

Delphi and Kirrha — decline of Krissa. — Insolence of the

Kirrhæans punished by the Amphiktyons. — First Sacred War, in

595 B. C. — Destruction of Kirrha. — Pythian games founded by

the Amphiktyons. — Nemean and Isthmian games. — Pan-Hellenic

character acquired by all the four festivals — Olympic, Pythian,

Nemean, and Isthmian. — Increased frequentation of the other

festivals in most Greek cities. — All other Greek cities, except

Sparta, encouraged such visits. — Effect of these festivals upon

the Greek mind. 50-73

CHAPTER XXIX.

LYRIC POETRY. — THE SEVEN WISE MEN.

Age and duration of the Greek lyric poetry. — Epical age

preceding the lyrical. — Wider range of subjects for poetry — new

metres — enlarged musical scale. — Improvement of the harp by

Terpander — of the flute by Olympus and others. — Archilochus,

Kallinus, Tyrtæus, and Alkman — 670-600 B. C. — New metres

superadded to the Hexameter — Elegiac, Iambic, Trochaic. —

Archilochus. — Simonidês of Amorgos, Kallinus, Tyrtæus. — Musical

and poetical tendencies at Sparta. — Choric training — Alkman,

Thalêtas. — Doric dialect employed in the choric compositions.

— Arion and Stêsichorus — substitution of the professional in

place of the popular chorus. — Distribution of the chorus by

Stêsichorus — Strophê — Antistrophê — Epôdus. — Alkæus and

Sappho. — Gnomic or moralizing poets. — Solon and Theognis. —

Subordination of musical and orchestrical accompaniment to the

words and meaning. — Seven Wise Men. — They were the first men

who acquired an Hellenic reputation, without poetical genius.

— Early manifestation of philosophy — in the form of maxims. —

Subsequent growth of dialectics and discussion. — Increase of the

habit of writing — commencement of prose compositions. — First

beginnings of Grecian art. — Restricted character of early art,

from religious associations. — Monumental ornaments in the cities

— begin in the sixth century B. C. — Importance of Grecian art as

a means of Hellenic union. 73-101

CHAPTER XXX.

GRECIAN AFFAIRS DURING THE GOVERNMENT OF PEISISTRATUS AND HIS SONS AT

ATHENS.

Peisistratus and his sons at Athens — B. C. 500-510 — uncertain

chronology as to Peisistratus. — State of feeling in Attica at

the accession of Peisistratus. — Retirement of Peisistratus, and

stratagem whereby he is reinstated. — Quarrel of Peisistratus

with the Alkmæônids — his second retirement. — His second and

final restoration. — His strong government — mercenaries —

purification of Delos. — Mild despotism of Peisistratus. — His

sons Hippias and Hipparchus. — Harmodius and Aristogeitôn. — They

conspire and kill Hipparchus. B. C. 514. — Strong and lasting

sentiment, coupled with great historical mistake, in the Athenian

public. — Hippias despot alone — 514-510 B. C. — his cruelty and

conscious insecurity. — Connection of Athens with the Thracian

Chersonesus and the Asiatic coast of the Hellespont. — First

Miltiadês — œkist of the Chersonese. — Second Miltiadês — sent

out thither by the Peisistratids. — Proceedings of the exiled

Alkmæônids against Hippias. — Conflagration and rebuilding of

the Delphian temple. — The Alkmæônids rebuild the temple with

magnificence. — Gratitude of the Delphians towards them — they

procure from the oracle directions to Sparta, enjoining the

expulsion of Hippias. — Spartan expeditions into Attica. —

Expulsion of Hippias, and liberation of Athens. 102-126

CHAPTER XXXI.

GRECIAN AFFAIRS AFTER THE EXPULSION OF THE PEISISTRATIDS. —

REVOLUTION OF KLEISTHENES AND ESTABLISHMENT OF DEMOCRACY AT ATHENS.

State of Athens after the expulsion of Hippias. — Opposing

party-leaders — Kleisthenês — Isagoras. — Democratical revolution

headed by Kleisthenês. — Rearrangement and extension of the

political franchise. — Suppression of the four old tribes, and

formation of ten new tribes, including an increased number

of the population. — Imperfect description of this event in

Herodotus — its real bearing. — Grounds of opposition to it in

ancient Athenian feeling. — Names of the new tribes — their

relation to the demes. — Demes belonging to each tribe usually

not adjacent to each other. — Arrangements and functions of the

deme. — Solonian constitution preserved, with modifications. —

Change of military arrangement in the state. — The ten stratêgi,

or generals. — The judicial assembly of citizens, or Heliæa,

subsequently divided into fractions, each judging separately. —

The political assembly, or ekklesia. — Financial arrangements.

— Senate of Five Hundred. — Ekklesia, or political assembly. —

Kleisthenês the real author of the Athenian democracy. — Judicial

attributes of the people — their gradual enlargement. — Three

points in Athenian constitutional law, hanging together: —

Universal admissibility of citizens to magistracy — choice by lot

— reduced functions of the magistrates chosen by lot. — Universal

admissibility of citizens to the archonship — not introduced

until after the battle of Platæa. — Constitution of Kleisthenês

retained the Solonian law of exclusion as to individual office. —

Difference between that constitution and the political state of

Athens after Periklês. — Senate of Areopagus. — The ostracism.

— Weakness of the public force in the Grecian governments. —

Past violences of the Athenian nobles. — Necessity of creating a

constitutional morality. — Purpose and working of the ostracism.

— Securities against its abuse. — Ostracism necessary as a

protection to the early democracy — afterwards dispensed with.

— Ostracism analogous to the exclusion of a known pretender to

the throne in a monarchy. — Effect of the long ascendency of

Periklês, in strengthening constitutional morality. — Ostracism

in other Grecian cities. — Striking effect of the revolution

of Kleisthenês on the minds of the citizens. — Isagoras calls

in Kleomenês and the Lacedæmonians against it. — Kleomenês and

Isagoras are expelled from Athens. — Recall of Kleisthenês —

Athens solicits the alliance of the Persians. — First connection

between Athens and Platæa. — Disputes between Platæa and Thebes

— decision of Corinth as arbitrator. — Second march of Kleomenês

against Athens — desertion of his allies. — First appearance of

Sparta as acting head of Peloponnesian allies. — Signal successes

of Athens against Bœotians and Chalkidians. — Plantation of

Athenian settlers, or klêruchs, in the territory of Chalkis. —

Distress of the Thebans — they ask assistance from Ægina. — The

Æginetans make war on Athens. — Preparations at Sparta to attack

Athens anew — the Spartan allies are summoned, together with

Hippias. — First formal convocation at Sparta — advance of Greece

towards a political system. — Proceedings of the convocation

— animated protest of Corinth against any interference in

favor of Hippias — the Spartan allies refuse to interfere. —

Aversion to single-headed rule — now predominant in Greece. —

Striking development of Athenian energy after the revolution of

Kleisthenês — language of Herodotus. — Effect of the idea or

theory of democracy in exciting Athenian sentiment. — Patriotism

of an Athenian between 500-400 B. C. — combined with an eager

spirit of personal military exertion and sacrifice. — Diminution

of this active sentiment in the restored democracy after the

Thirty Tyrants. 126-181

CHAPTER XXXII.

RISE OF THE PERSIAN EMPIRE. — CYRUS.

State of Asia before the rise of the Persian monarchy. — Great

power and alliances of Crœsus. — Rise of Cyrus — uncertainty of

his early history. — Story of Astyagês. — Herodotus and Ktêsias.

— Condition of the native Persians at the first rise of Cyrus.

— Territory of Iran — between Tigris and Indus. — War between

Cyrus and Crœsus. — Crœsus tests the oracles — triumphant reply

from Delphi — munificence of Crœsus to the oracle. — Advice given

to him by the oracle. — He solicits the alliance of Sparta. —

He crosses the Halys and attacks the Persians. — Rapid march of

Cyrus to Sardis. — Siege and capture of Sardis. — Crœsus becomes

prisoner of Cyrus — how treated. — Remonstrance addressed by

Crœsus to the Delphian god. — Successful justification of the

oracle. — Fate of Crœsus impressive to the Greek mind. — The

Mœræ, or Fates. — State of the Asiatic Greeks after the conquest

of Lydia by Cyrus. — They apply in vain to Sparta for aid. —

Cyrus quits Sardis — revolt of the Lydians suppressed. — The

Persian general Mazarês attacks Ionia — the Lydian Paktyas. —

Harpagus succeeds Mazarês — conquest of Ionia by the Persians.

— Fate of Phôkæa. — Emigration of the Phôkæans vowed by all,

executed only by one half. — Phôkæan colony first at Alalia, then

at Elea. — Proposition of Bias for a Pan-Ionic emigration not

adopted. — Entire conquest of Asia Minor by the Persians. 182-208

CHAPTER XXXIII.

GROWTH OF THE PERSIAN EMPIRE.

Conquests of Cyrus in Asia. — His attack of Babylon. — Difficult

approach to Babylon — no resistance made to the invaders. — Cyrus

distributes the river Gyndês into many channels. — He takes

Babylon, by drawing off for a time the waters of the Euphrates.

— Babylon left in undiminished strength and population. — Cyrus

attacks the Massagetæ — is defeated and slain. — Extraordinary

stimulus to the Persians, from the conquests of Cyrus. —

Character of the Persians. — Thirst for foreign conquest among

the Persians, for three reigns after Cyrus. — Kambysês succeeds

his father Cyrus — his invasion of Egypt. — Death of Amasis, king

of Egypt, at the time when the Persian expedition was preparing

— his son Psammenitus succeeds. — Conquest of Egypt by Kambysês.

— Submission of Kyrênê and Barka to Kambysês — his projects for

conquering Libya and Ethiopia disappointed. — Insults of Kambysês

to the Egyptian religion. — Madness of Kambysês — he puts to

death his younger brother, Smerdis. — Conspiracy of the Magian

Patizeithês who sets up his brother as king under the name of

Smerdis. — Death of Kambysês. — Reign of the false Smerdis —

conspiracy of the seven Persian noblemen against him — he is

slain. — Darius succeeds to the throne. — Political bearing

of this conspiracy — Smerdis represents Median preponderance,

which is again put down by Darius. — Revolt of the Medes —

suppressed. — Discontents of the satraps. — Revolt of Babylon.

— Reconquered and dismantled by Darius. — Organization of the

Persian empire by Darius. — Twenty satrapies with a fixed tribute

apportioned to each. — Imposts upon the different satrapies.

— Organizing tendency of Darius — first imperial coinage —

imperial roads and posts. — Island of Samos — its condition at

the accession of Darius. — Polykratês. — Polykratês breaks with

Amasis, king of Egypt, and allies himself with Kambysês. — The

Samian exiles, expelled by Polykratês, apply to Sparta for aid.

— The Lacedæmonians attack Samos, but are repulsed. — Attack on

Siphnos by the Samian exiles. — Prosperity of Polykratês. — He is

slain by the Persian satrap Orœtês. — Mæandrius, lieutenant of

Polykratês in Samos — he desires to establish a free government

after the death of Polykratês — conduct of the Samians. —

Mæandrius becomes despot. — Contrast between the Athenians

and the Samians. — Sylosôn, brother of Polykratês, lands with

a Persian army in Samos — his history. — Mæandrius agrees to

evacuate the island. — Many Persian officers slain — slaughter

of the Samians. — Sylosôn despot at Samos. — Application of

Mæandrius to Sparta for aid — refused. 209-252

CHAPTER XXXIV.

DEMOKEDES. — DARIUS INVADES SCYTHIA.

Conquering dispositions of Darius. — Influence of his wife,

Atossa. — Dêmokêdês, the Krotoniate surgeon — his adventures — he

is carried a slave to Susa. — He cures Darius, who rewards him

munificently. — He procures permission by artifice, and through

the influence of Atossa, to return to Greece. — Atossa suggests

to Darius an expedition against Greece. — Dêmokêdês, with some

Persians, is sent to procure information for him. — Voyage of

Dêmokêdês along the coast of Greece — he stays at Kroton — fate

of his Persian companions. — Consequences which might have been

expected to happen if Darius had then undertaken his expedition

against Greece. — Darius marches against Scythia. — His naval

force formed of Asiatic and insular Greeks. — He directs the

Greeks to throw a bridge over the Danube and crosses the river.

— He marches into Scythia — narrative of his march impossible

and unintelligible, considered as history. — The description

of his march is rather to be looked upon as a fancy-picture,

illustrative of Scythian warfare. — Poetical grouping of the

Scythians and their neighbors by Herodotus. — Strong impression

produced upon the imagination of Herodotus by the Scythians. —

Orders given by Darius to the Ionians at the bridge over the

Danube. — The Ionians are left in guard of the bridge; their

conduct when Darius’s return is delayed. — The Ionian despots

preserve the bridge and enable Darius to recross the river, as

a means of support to their own dominion at home. — Opportunity

lost of emancipation from the Persians — Conquest of Thrace by

the Persians as far as the river Strymon — Myrkinus near that

river given to Histiæus. — Macedonians and Pæonians are conquered

by Megabazus. — Insolence of the Persian envoys in Macedonia

— they are murdered. — Histiæus founds a prosperous colony at

Myrkinus — Darius sends for him into Asia. — Otanês Persian

general on the Hellespont — he conquers the Pelasgian population

of Lemnos, Imbros, etc. — Lemnos and Imbros captured by the

Athenians and Miltiadês. 252-280

CHAPTER XXXV.

IONIC REVOLT.

Darius carries Histiæus to Susa. — Application of the banished

Hippias to Artaphernês, satrap of Sardis. — State of the island

of Naxos — Naxian exiles solicit aid from Aristagoras of Milêtus.

— Expedition against Naxos, undertaken by Aristagoras with the

assistance of Artaphernês the satrap. — Its failure, through

dispute between Aristagoras and the Persian general, Megabatês.

— Alarm of Aristagoras — he determines to revolt against Persia

— instigation to the same effect from Histiæus. — Revolt of

Aristagoras and the Milesians — the despots in the various cities

deposed and seized. — Extension of the revolt throughout Asiatic

Greece — Aristagoras goes to solicit aid from Sparta. — Refusal

of the Spartans to assist him. — Aristagoras applies to Athens —

obtains aid both from Athens and Eretria. — March of Aristagoras

up to Sardis with the Athenian and Eretrian allies — burning of

the town — retreat and defeat of these Greeks by the Persians.

— The Athenians abandon the alliance. — Extension of the revolt

to Cyprus and Byzantium. — Phenician fleet called forth by the

Persians — Persian and Phenician armament sent against Cyprus

— the Ionians send aid thither — victory of the Persians —

they reconquer the island. — Successes of the Persians against

the revolted coast of Asia Minor. — Aristagoras loses courage

and abandons the country. — Appearance of Histiæus, who had

obtained leave of departure from Susa. — Histiæus is suspected by

Artaphernês — flees to Chios. — He attempts in vain to procure

admission into Milêtus — puts himself at the head of a small

piratical squadron. — Large Persian force assembled, aided by the

Phenician fleet, for the siege of Milêtus. — The allied Grecian

fleet mustered at Ladê. — Attempts of the Persians to disunite

the allies, by means of the exiled despots. — Want of command

and discipline in the Grecian fleet. — Energy of the Phôkæan

Dionysius — he is allowed to assume the command. — Discontent

of the Grecian crews — they refuse to act under Dionysius.

— Contrast of this incapacity of the Ionic crews with the

subsequent severe discipline of the Athenian seamen. — Disorder

and mistrust grow up in the fleet — treachery of the Samian

captains. — Complete victory of the Persian fleet at Ladê — ruin

of the Ionic fleet — severe loss of the Chians. — Voluntary

exile and adventures of Dionysius. — Siege, capture, and ruin of

Milêtus by the Persians. — The Phenician fleet reconquers all

the coast-towns and islands. — Narrow escape of Miltiadês from

their pursuit. — Cruelties of the Persians after the reconquest.

— Movements and death of Histiæus. — Sympathy and terror of

the Athenians at the capture of Milêtus — the tragic writer

Phrynichus is fined. 280-310

CHAPTER XXXVI.

FROM THE IONIC REVOLT TO THE BATTLE OF MARATHON.

Proceedings of the satrap Artaphernês after the reconquest of

Ionia — Mardonius comes with an army into Ionia — he puts down

the despots in the Greek cities. — He marches into Thrace and

Macedonia — his fleet destroyed by a terrible storm near Mount

Athos — he returns into Asia. — Island of Thasos — prepares to

revolt from the Persians — forced to submit. — Preparations of

Darius for invading Greece — he sends heralds round the Grecian

towns to demand earth and water — many of them submit. — Ægina

among those towns which submitted — state and relations of this

island. — Heralds from Darius are put to death, both at Athens

and Sparta. — Effects of this act in throwing Sparta into a state

of hostility against Persia. — The Athenians appeal to Sparta,

in consequence of the _medism_ (or submission to the Persians)

of Ægina. — Interference of Sparta — her distinct acquisition

and acceptance of the leadership of Greece. — One condition of

recognized Spartan leadership was the extreme weakness of Argos

at this moment. — Victorious war of Sparta against Argos. —

Destruction of the Argeians by Kleomenês, in the grove of the

hero Argus. — Kleomenês returns without having attacked the

city of Argos. — He is tried — his peculiar mode of defence

— acquitted. — Argos unable to interfere with Sparta in the

affair of Ægina and in her presidential power. — Kleomenês goes

to Ægina to seize the _medizing_ leaders — resistance made to

him, at the instigation of his colleague Demaratus. — Demaratus

is deposed, and Leotychidês chosen king, by the intrigues of

Kleomenês. — Demaratus leaves Sparta and goes to Darius. —

Kleomenês and Leotychidês go to Ægina, seize ten hostages,

and convey them as prisoners to Athens. — Important effect of

this proceeding upon the result of the first Persian invasion

of Greece. — Assemblage of the vast Persian armament under

Datis at Samos. — He crosses the Ægean — carries the island of

Naxos without resistance — respects Delos. — He reaches Eubœa

— siege and capture of Eretria. — Datis lands at Marathon. —

Existing condition and character of the Athenians. — Miltiadês

— his adventures — chosen one of the ten generals in the year

in which the Persians landed at Marathon. — Themistoklês and

Aristeidês. — Miltiadês, Aristeidês, and perhaps Themistoklês,

were now among the ten stratêgi, or generals, in 490 B. C. —

The Athenians ask aid from Sparta — delay of the Spartans. —

Difference of opinion among the ten Athenian generals — five of

them recommend an immediate battle, the other five are adverse

to it. — Urgent instances of Miltiadês in favor of an immediate

battle — casting-vote of the polemarch determines it. — March of

the Athenians to Marathon — the Platæans spontaneously join them

there. — Numbers of the armies. — Locality of Marathon. — Battle

of Marathon — rapid charge of Miltiadês — defeat of the Persians.

— Loss on both sides. — Ulterior plans of the Persians against

Athens — party in Attica favorable to them. — Rapid march of

Miltiadês back to Athens on the day of the battle. — The Persians

abandon the enterprise, and return home. — Athens rescued through

the speedy battle brought on by Miltiadês. — Change of Grecian

feeling as to the Persians — terror which the latter inspired

at the time of the battle of Marathon. — Immense effect of the

Marathonian victory on the feelings of the Greeks — especially

of the Athenians. — Who were the traitors that invited the

Persians to Athens after the battle — false imputation on the

Alkmæônids. — Supernatural belief connected with the battle —

commemorations of it. — Return of Datis to Asia — fate of the

Eretrian captives. — Glory of Miltiadês — his subsequent conduct

— unsuccessful expedition against Paros — bad hurt of Miltiadês.

— Disgrace of Miltiadês on his return. — He is fined — dies of

his wound — the fine is paid by his son Kimon. — Reflections on

the closing adventures of the life of Miltiadês. — Fickleness

and ingratitude imputed to the Athenians — how far they deserve

the charge. — Usual temper of the Athenian dikasts in estimating

previous services. — Tendency of eminent Greeks to be corrupted

by success. — In what sense it is apparently true that fickleness

was an attribute of the Athenian democracy. 311-378

CHAPTER XXXVII.

IONIC PHILOSOPHERS. — PYTHAGORAS. — KROTON AND SYBARIS.

Phalaris despot of Agrigentum. — Thalês. — Ionic philosophers

— not a school or succession. — Step in philosophy commenced

by Thalês. — Vast problems with scanty means of solution. —

One cause of the vein of skepticism which runs through Grecian

philosophy. — Thalês — primeval element of water, or the fluid.

— Anaximander. — Problem of the One and the Many — the Permanent

and the Variable. — Xenophanês — his doctrine the opposite of

that of Anaximander. — The Eleatic school, Parmenidês and Zeno,

springing from Xenophanês — their dialectics — their great

influence on Grecian speculation. — Pherekydês. — History of

Pythagoras. — His character and doctrines. — Pythagoras more a

missionary and schoolmaster than a politician — his political

efficiency exaggerated by later witnesses. — His ethical training

— probably not applied to all the members of his order. — Decline

and subsequent renovation of the Pythagorean order. — Pythagoras

not merely a borrower, but an original and ascendent mind. — He

passes from Samos to Kroton. — State of Kroton — oligarchical

government — excellent gymnastic training and medical skill.

— Rapid and wonderful effects said to have been produced by

the exhortations of Pythagoras. — He forms a powerful club, or

society, consisting of three hundred men taken from the wealthy

classes at Kroton. — Political influence of Pythagoras — was an

indirect result of the constitution of the order. — Causes which

led to the subversion of the Pythagorean order. — Violences which

accompanied its subversion. — The Pythagorean order is reduced

to a religious and philosophical sect, in which character it

continues. — War between Sybaris and Kroton. — Defeat of the

Sybarites, and destruction of their city, partly through the

aid of the Spartan prince Dorieus. — Sensation excited in the

Hellenic world by the destruction of Sybaris. — Gradual decline

of the Greek power in Italy. — Contradictory statements and

arguments respecting the presence of Dorieus. — Herodotus does

not mention the Pythagoreans, when he alludes to the war between

Sybaris and Kroton. — Charondas, lawgiver of Katana, Naxos,

Zanklê, Rhegium, etc. 378-419

HISTORY OF GREECE.

PART II.

CONTINUATION OF HISTORICAL GREECE.

History of Greece, Volume 04 (of 12) · 第 1 / 16 章