IX

Whitman will always be a strange and unwonted figure among his country's

poets, and among English poets generally,--a cropping out again, after so

many centuries, of the old bardic prophetic strain. Had he dropped upon us

from some other sphere, he could hardly have been a greater surprise and

puzzle to the average reader or critic. Into a literature that was timid,

imitative, conventional, he fell like leviathan into a duck-pond, and the

commotion and consternation he created there have not yet subsided. All

the reigning poets in this country except Emerson denied him, and many of

our minor poets still keep up a hostile sissing and cackling. He will

probably always be more or less a stumbling-block to the minor poet,

because of his indifference to the things which to the minor poet are all

in all. He was a poet without what is called artistic form, and without

technique, as that word is commonly understood. His method was analogous

to the dynamic method of organic nature, rather than to the mechanical or

constructive method of the popular poets.

X

Of course the first thing that strikes the reader in "Leaves of Grass" is

its seeming oddity and strangeness. If a man were to come into a dress

reception in shirt sleeves and with his hat on, the feature would strike

us at once, and would be magnified in our eyes; we should quite forget

that he was a man, and in essentials differed but little from the rest of

us, after all. The exterior habiliments on such occasions count for nearly

everything; and in the popular poetry rhyme, measure, and the language and

manners of the poets are much more than anything else. If Whitman did not

do anything so outré as to come into a dress reception with his coat off

and his hat on, he did come into the circle of the poets without the usual

poetic habiliments. He was not dressed up at all, and he was not at all

abashed or apologetic. His air was confident and self-satisfied, if it did

not at times suggest the insolent and aggressive. It was the dress circle

that was on trial, and not Walt Whitman.

We could forgive a man in real life for such an audacious proceeding only

on the ground of his being something extraordinary as a person, with an

extraordinary message to convey; and we can pardon the poet only on

precisely like grounds. He must make us forget his unwonted garb by his

unique and lovable personality, and the power and wisdom of his utterance.

If he cannot do this we shall soon tire of him.

That Whitman was a personality the like of which the world has not often

seen, and that his message to his country and to his race was of prime

importance, are conclusions at which more and more thinking persons are

surely arriving.

His want of art, of which we have heard so much, is, it seems to me, just

this want of the usual trappings and dress uniform of the poets. In the

essentials of art, the creative imagination, the plastic and quickening

spirit, the power of identification with the thing contemplated, and the

absolute use of words, he has few rivals.

Whitman: A Study · 第 33 / 140 题