ELLISTONIANA

My acquaintance with the pleasant creature, whose loss we all deplore,

was but slight.

My first introduction to E., which afterwards ripened into an

acquaintance a little on this side of intimacy, was over a counter

of the Leamington Spa Library, then newly entered upon by a branch

of his family. E., whom nothing misbecame--to auspicate, I suppose,

the filial concern, and set it a going with a lustre--was serving in

person two damsels fair, who had come into the shop ostensibly to

inquire for some new publication, but in reality to have a sight of

the illustrious shopman, hoping some conference. With what an air did

he reach down the volume, dispassionately giving his opinion upon the

worth of the work in question, and launching out into a dissertation

on its comparative merits with those of certain publications of a

similar stamp, its rivals! his enchanted customers fairly hanging on

his lips, subdued to their authoritative sentence. So have I seen a

gentleman in comedy _acting_ the shopman. So Lovelace sold his gloves

in King Street. I admired the histrionic art, by which he contrived to

carry clean away every notion of disgrace, from the occupation he had

so generously submitted to; and from that hour I judged him, with no

after repentance, to be a person, with whom it would be a felicity to

be more acquainted.

To descant upon his merits as a Comedian would be superfluous. With

his blended private and professional habits alone I have to do;

that harmonious fusion of the manners of the player into those of

every day life, which brought the stage boards into streets, and

dining-parlours, and kept up the play when the play was ended.--"I

like Wrench," a friend was saying to him one day, "because he is the

same natural, easy creature, _on_ the stage, that he is _off_." "My

case exactly," retorted Elliston--with a charming forgetfulness,

that the converse of a proposition does not always lead to the same

conclusion--"I am the same person _off_ the stage that I am _on_." The

inference, at first sight, seems identical; but examine it a little,

and it confesses only, that the one performer was never, and the other

always, _acting_.

And in truth this was the charm of Elliston's private deportment.

You had a spirited performance always going on before your eyes,

with nothing to pay. As where a monarch takes up his casual abode for

a night, the poorest hovel which he honours by his sleeping in it,

becomes _ipso facto_ for that time a palace; so where-ever Elliston

walked, sate, or stood still, there was the theatre. He carried about

with him his pit, boxes, and galleries, and set up his portable

playhouse at corners of streets, and in the market-places. Upon

flintiest pavements he trod the boards still; and if his theme chanced

to be passionate, the green baize carpet of tragedy spontaneously rose

beneath his feet. Now this was hearty, and showed a love for his art.

So Apelles _always_ painted--in thought. So G.D. _always_ poetises.

I hate a lukewarm artist. I have known actors--and some of them of

Elliston's own stamp--who shall have agreeably been amusing you in

the part of a rake or a coxcomb, through the two or three hours of

their dramatic existence; but no sooner does the curtain fall with

its leaden clatter, but a spirit of lead seems to seize on all their

faculties. They emerge sour, morose persons, intolerable to their

families, servants, &c. Another shall have been expanding your heart

with generous deeds and sentiments, till it even beats with yearnings

of universal sympathy; you absolutely long to go home, and do some

good action. The play seems tedious, till you can get fairly out of

the house, and realise your laudable intentions. At length the final

bell rings, and this cordial representative of all that is amiable

in human breasts steps forth--a miser. Elliston was more of a piece.

Did he _play_ Ranger? and did Ranger fill the general bosom of the

town with satisfaction? why should _he_ not be Ranger, and diffuse

the same cordial satisfaction among his private circles? with _his_

temperament, _his_ animal spirits, _his_ good-nature, _his_ follies

perchance, could he do better than identify himself with his

impersonation? Are we to like a pleasant rake, or coxcomb, on the

stage, and give ourselves airs of aversion for the identical character

presented to us in actual life? or what would the performer have

gained by divesting himself of the impersonation? Could the man

Elliston have been essentially different from his part, even if he

had avoided to reflect to us studiously, in private circles, the

airy briskness, the forwardness, and 'scape goat trickeries of his

prototype?

"But there is something not natural in this everlasting _acting_; we

want the real man."

Are you quite sure that it is not the man himself, whom you cannot, or

will not see, under some adventitious trappings, which, nevertheless,

sit not at all inconsistently upon him? What if it is the nature of

some men to be highly artificial? The fault is least reprehensible in

_players_. Cibber was his own Foppington, with almost as much wit as

Vanburgh could add to it.

"My conceit of his person,"--it is Ben Jonson speaking of Lord

Bacon,--"was never increased towards him by his _place_ or _honours_.

But I have, and do reverence him for the _greatness_, that was only

proper to himself; in that he seemed to me ever one of the _greatest_

men, that had been in many ages. In his adversity I ever prayed that

heaven would give him strength; for _greatness_ he could not want."

The quality here commended was scarcely less conspicuous in the

subject of these idle reminiscences, than in my Lord Verulam. Those

who have imagined that an unexpected elevation to the direction of a

great London Theatre, affected the consequence of Elliston, or at all

changed his nature, knew not the essential _greatness_ of the man whom

they disparage. It was my fortune to encounter him near St. Dunstan's

Church (which, with its punctual giants, is now no more than dust

and a shadow), on the morning of his election to that high office.

Grasping my hand with a look of significance, he only uttered,--"Have

you heard the news?"--then with another look following up

the blow, he subjoined, "I am the future Manager of Drury Lane

Theatre."--Breathless as he saw me, he stayed not for congratulation

or reply, but mutely stalked away, leaving me to chew upon his

new-blown dignities at leisure. In fact, nothing could be said to

it. Expressive silence alone could muse his praise. This was in his

_great_ style.

But was he less _great_, (be witness, O ye Powers of Equanimity,

that supported in the ruins of Carthage the consular exile, and

more recently transmuted for a more illustrious exile the barren

constableship of Elba into an image of Imperial France), when, in

melancholy after-years, again, much near the same spot, I met him,

when that sceptre had been wrested from his hand, and his dominion was

curtailed to the petty managership, and part proprietorship, of the

small Olympic, _his Elba?_ He still played nightly upon the boards

of Drury, but in parts alas! allotted to him, not magnificently

distributed by him. Waiving his great loss as nothing, and

magnificently sinking the sense of fallen _material_ grandeur in

the more liberal resentment of depreciations done to his more

lofty _intellectual_ pretensions, "Have you heard" (his customary

exordium)--"have you heard," said he, "how they treat me? they put me

in _comedy_." Thought I--but his finger on his lips forbade any verbal

interruption--"where could they have put you better?" Then, after a

pause--"Where I formerly played Romeo, I now play Mercutio,"--and so

again he stalked away, neither staying, nor caring for, responses.

O, it was a rich scene,--but Sir A---- C----, the best of

story-tellers and surgeons, who mends a lame narrative almost as

well as he sets a fracture, alone could do justice to it--that I was

witness to, in the tarnished room (that had once been green) of that

same little Olympic. There, after his deposition from Imperial Drury,

he substituted a throne. That Olympic Hill was his "highest heaven;"

himself "Jove in his chair." There he sat in state, while before

him, on complaint of prompter, was brought for judgment--how shall

I describe her?--one of those little tawdry things that flirt at

the tails of choruses--a probationer for the town, in either of its

senses--the pertest little drab--a dirty fringe and appendage of the

lamps' smoke--who, it seems, on some disapprobation expressed by a

"highly respectable" audience, had precipitately quitted her station

on the boards, and withdrawn her small talents in disgust.

"And how dare you," said her Manager--assuming a censorial severity

which would have crushed the confidence of a Vestris, and disarmed

that beautiful Rebel herself of her professional caprices--I verily

believe, he thought _her_ standing before him--"how dare you, Madam,

withdraw yourself, without a notice, from your theatrical duties?" "I

was hissed, Sir." "And you have the presumption to decide upon the

taste of the town?" "I don't know that, Sir, but I will never stand

to be hissed," was the subjoinder of young Confidence--when gathering

up his features into one significant mass of wonder, pity, and

expostulatory indignation--in a lesson never to have been lost upon a

creature less forward than she who stood before him--his words were

these: "They have hissed _me_."

'Twas the identical argument _a fortiori_, which the son of Peleus

uses to Lycaon trembling under his lance, to persuade him to take his

destiny with a good grace. "I too am mortal." And it is to be believed

that in both cases the rhetoric missed of its application, for want

of a proper understanding with the faculties of the respective

recipients.

"Quite an Opera pit," he said to me, as he was courteously conducting

me over the benches of his Surrey Theatre, the last retreat, and

recess, of his every-day waning grandeur.

Those who knew Elliston, will know the _manner_ in which he pronounced

the latter sentence of the few words I am about to record. One proud

day to me he took his roast mutton with us in the Temple, to which

I had superadded a preliminary haddock. After a rather plentiful

partaking of the meagre banquet, not unrefreshed with the humbler sort

of liquors, I made a sort of apology for the humility of the fare,

observing that for my own part I never ate but of one dish at dinner.

"I too never eat but one thing at dinner"--was his reply--then after

a pause--"reckoning fish as nothing." The manner was all. It was as

if by one peremptory sentence he had decreed the annihilation of all

the savory esculents, which the pleasant and nutritious-food-giving

Ocean pours forth upon poor humans from her watery bosom. This was

_greatness_, tempered with considerate _tenderness_ to the feelings of

his scanty but welcoming entertainer.

_Great_ wert thou in thy life, Robert William Elliston! and _not

lessened_ in thy death, if report speak truly, which says that

thou didst direct that thy mortal remains should repose under no

inscription but one of pure _Latinity_. Classical was thy bringing

up! and beautiful was the feeling on thy last bed, which, connecting

the man with the boy, took thee back in thy latest exercise

of imagination, to the days when, undreaming of Theatres and

Managerships, thou wert a scholar, and an early ripe one, under the

roofs builded by the munificent and pious Colet. For thee the Pauline

Muses weep. In elegies, that shall silence this crude prose, they

shall celebrate thy praise.

The Works of Charles and Mary Lamb — Volume 2 Elia and The Last Essays of Elia · 第 62 / 155 题