ON THE ACTING OF MUNDEN

Not many nights ago I had come home from seeing this extraordinary

performer in Cockletop; and when I retired to my pillow, his whimsical

image still stuck by me, in a manner as to threaten sleep. In vain

I tried to divest myself of it, by conjuring up the most opposite

associations. I resolved to be serious. I raised up the gravest topics

of life; private misery, public calamity. All would not do.

--There the antic sate

Mocking our state--

his queer visnomy--his bewildering costume--all the strange things

which he had raked together--his serpentine rod, swagging about in his

pocket--Cleopatra's tear, and the rest of his relics--O'Keefe's wild

farce, and _his_ wilder commentary--till the passion of laughter, like

grief in excess, relieved itself by its own weight, inviting the sleep

which in the first instance it had driven away.

But I was not to escape so easily. No sooner did I fall into slumbers,

than the same image, only more perplexing, assailed me in the shape

of dreams. Not one Munden, but five hundred, were dancing before me,

like the faces which, whether you will or no, come when you have been

taking opium--all the strange combinations, which this strangest of

all strange mortals ever shot his proper countenance into, from the

day he came commissioned to dry up the tears of the town for the loss

of the now almost forgotten Edwin. O for the power of the pencil

to have fixed them when I awoke! A season or two since there was

exhibited a Hogarth gallery. I do not see why there should not be a

Munden gallery. In richness and variety the latter would not fall far

short of the former.

There is one face of Farley, one face of Knight, one (but what a one

it is!) of Liston; but Munden has none that you can properly pin down,

and call _his_. When you think he has exhausted his battery of looks,

in unaccountable warfare with your gravity, suddenly he sprouts out an

entirely new set of features, like Hydra. He is not one, but legion.

Not so much a comedian, as a company. If his name could be multiplied

like his countenance, it might fill a play-bill. He, and he alone,

literally _makes faces_: applied to any other person, the phrase is a

mere figure, denoting certain modifications of the human countenance.

Out of some invisible wardrobe he dips for faces, as his friend

Suett used for wigs, and fetches them out as easily. I should not be

surprised to see him some day put out the head of a river horse; or

come forth a pewitt, or lapwing, some feathered metamorphosis.

I have seen this gifted actor, in Sir Christopher Curry--in Old

Dornton--diffuse a glow of sentiment which has made the pulse of a

crowded theatre beat like that of one man; when he has come in aid of

the pulpit, doing good to the moral heart of a people. I have seen

some faint approaches to this sort of excellence in other players.

But in the grand grotesque of farce, Munden stands out as single and

unaccompanied as Hogarth. Hogarth, strange to tell, had no followers.

The school of Munden began, and must end with himself.

Can any man _wonder_, like him? can any man _see ghosts_, like

him? or _fight with his own shadow_--"SESSA"--as he does in that

strangely-neglected thing, the Cobbler of Preston--where his

alternations from the Cobbler to the Magnifico, and from the Magnifico

to the Cobbler, keep the brain of the spectator in as wild a ferment,

as if some Arabian Night were being acted before him. Who like him

can throw, or ever attempted to throw, a preternatural interest over

the commonest daily-life objects? A table, or a joint stool, in his

conception, rises into a dignity equivalent to Cassiopeia's chair. It

is invested with constellatory importance. You could not speak of it

with more deference, if it were mounted into the firmament. A beggar

in the hands of Michael Angelo, says Fuseli, rose the Patriarch of

Poverty. So the gusto of Munden antiquates and ennobles what it

touches. His pots and his ladles are as grand and primal as the

seething-pots and hooks seen in old prophetic vision. A tub of butter,

contemplated by him, amounts to a Platonic idea. He understands a leg

of mutton in its quiddity. He stands wondering, amid the common-place

materials of life, like primæval man with the sun and stars about him.

The Works of Charles and Mary Lamb — Volume 2 Elia and The Last Essays of Elia · 第 53 / 155 题