LITERARY NOTICES.

Popular Edition. RESULTS OF EMANCIPATION. By AUGUSTIN

COCHIN, Ex-Maire and Municipal Councillor of Paris. Work

crowned by the Institute of France (Académie Française). Translated

by MARY L. BOOTH, Translator of Count de Gasparin's work

on America, etc. Fourth thousand. Boston: Walker, Wise & Co., 245

Washington street. 1864.

A remarkable book, indicative of a new era in the discussion of social,

religious, political, and economical questions. Prejudice, misstatement,

and fanaticism are apparently so opposed to the clear, candid mind of

the author, that he has needed no effort to avoid them, and in their

stead give us simple truth, broad views of men and things, and the

highest conceptions of duty and charity, together with the nicest

consideration of the rights and material interests, even the local

prejudices and misconceptions, of our fellow mortals. He shows clearly

that a _moral_ wrong can never long tend to _material_ advantage, and

that the laws of _society_ cannot be made ultimately to triumph over the

laws of _nature_; neither, in general, can a wrong be righted without

some suffering by way of expiation.

Although filled with statistical details, the work cannot fail to be

intensely interesting to the general reader. Lofty, hopeful, rational,

and yet progressive in its tone, it is calculated to do great good, not

only through the useful information and instructive generalizations it

makes known, but also as a model of right feeling, and consequent good

breeding, in its peculiar sphere.

The chapters upon the sugar question are wonderfully lucid and

convincing. Their bearing upon mooted points of political economy

recommend them to the study of all interested in that intricate subject.

The distressing relations necessarily existing between slavery and

religious instruction are also plainly set forth, and the general

conclusion of the book (that 'emancipation' is not only possible, but

most expedient, and that, with certain care upon the part of the

Government and of slave owners, an immediate and simultaneous liberation

is likely to breed fewer disturbances and less evil than gradual

disenthralment) seems to be rapidly gaining ground in the convictions of

our own countrymen. The conscience, and prophetic dreams of priests,

women, and poets, have long given assurance of such results, but the

world, of course, required definite experience and practical essays

before instituting any extensive course of action in that direction.

'A council held in the city of London in 1102, under the presidency

of St. Anselm, interdicted trade in slaves. This was eight hundred

years before the same object was debated in the same city before

Parliament. In 1780, Thomas Clarkson proposed to abolish the slave

trade. In 1787, Wilberforce renewed the proposition. Seven times

presented from 1793 to 1799, the bill seven times failed.

Successively laid over, it triumphed at length in 1806 and 1807.

All the Christian nations followed this memorable example. At the

Congress of Vienna, all the Powers pledged themselves to unite

their efforts to obtain _the entire and final abolition of a

traffic so odious and so loudly reproved by the laws of religion

and nature_. The slave trade was abolished in 1808 by the American

United States; in 1811, by Denmark, Portugal, and Chili; in 1813,

by Sweden; in 1814 and 1815, by Holland; in 1815, by France; in

1822, by Spain. In this same year, 1822, Wilberforce attacked

slavery after the slave trade, and won over public opinion by

appeals and repeated meetings, while his friend Mr. Buxton proposed

emancipation in Parliament. The Emancipation Bill was presented in

1833. On the 1st of August, 1834, slavery ceased to sully the soil

of the English colonies. In 1846, Sweden, in 1847, Denmark,

Uruguay, Wallachia, and Tunis, obeyed the same impulse, which

France followed in 1848, Portugal in 1856, and which Holland

promised to imitate in 1860. An earnest movement agitated Brazil.'

In Poland, the serfdom of the peasants was never sanctioned by law, but

existed in later times by reason of exception and abuse. Stanislas

Leszczynski, King of Poland, in 1720 raised his voice in favor of the

peasant population; the same principles were in 1768 defended, sword in

hand, by the Confederation of Bar, discussed in the diets of 1776, 1780,

1788, and finally adopted by the famous Constituent Assembly of 1791.

Thadeus Kosciuszko (May 7th, 1794), then Dictator of Poland, issued a

document giving entire personal liberty to all serfs; and on the 22d of

January, 1863, the members of the 'National Polish Government' decreed

that the peasants were not only free, but were entitled to a certain

portion of land, of which they should be the sole proprietors. In 1861,

Russia emancipated all serfs within her borders. In the United States,

the stern 'logic of events' seems to be rapidly bringing about similar

results, although indeed 'slavery' and 'serfdom' should never be

mentioned together, being so essentially different; the one the

possession of the _man_, the other merely the ownership of his _labor_

or of a _portion of its results_.

We cannot better conclude than by giving the following extract from the

Introduction of M. Cochin, who, by the way, is a man of good family and

ample fortune, an eminent publicist, and a Catholic of the school of

Lacordaire, Montalembert, Monseigneur d'Orleans, and the Prince de

Broglie:

'It was once exclaimed, Perish the colonies, rather than a

principle! The principle has not perished, the colonies have not

perished.

'It is not correct that interests should yield to principles;

between legitimate interests and true principles, harmony is

infallible; this is truth. Those who look only to interests are

sooner or later deceived in their calculations; those who,

exclusively occupied with principles, are generous without being

practical, cease to be generous, for they lead the cause which they

serve to certain destruction. It is the will of God that realities

should mingle with ideas, and that material obstacles should compel

the purchase of progress by toil.'

The publishers tell us that, a large demand for this work having arisen,

they have issued this 'popular edition,' wherein the figures in the

original are given as nearly as possible in the American currencies,

measures, etc.

STUMBLING BLOCKS. By GAIL HAMILTON, Author of

'Country Living and Country Thinking,' 'Gala Days,' etc. Boston:

Ticknor & Fields, For sale by D. Appleton & Co., New York.

Gail Hamilton's religious position gives her vast advantages. She is

thoroughly orthodox, Calvinistic, and Congregational, and being neither

Unitarian nor Catholic, will not be regarded as one of the 'Suspect' by

the great community of the so-called evangelical Christians. But she is

a bold, independent thinker, and spurns the trammels of bigotry and

prescription. No party spirit blinds her clear vision, no sectarian

prejudice vitiates her statements of the creeds of others, or induces

her to veil the faults and follies of those worshipping in the same

church with herself. Ministers are by no means immaculate saints in her

eyes. Seating herself in the pews, she preaches better sermons to them

than they are in the habit of giving to their people; taking possession

of their pulpits, she shows them what might and ought to be done from

that throne of power. Petty vanities, subjective experiences recorded in

morbid journals, religious frames of mind frequently dwelt upon until

the tortured self-watcher is driven into insanity, fall under her

scathing rebuke.

This volume deals chiefly with the shortcomings of the orthodox

religious world. Its faults of temper, its repulsive manners, its custom

of making home unlovely, its distaste of innocent amusement, its habits

of censure, its self-sufficiency and pharisaical character, are touched

with a caustic but healing power. Only the hand of a friend could have

done this thing. No point of doctrine is questioned, no principle of

faith invaded, no charity wounded. She probes in love--her object is

cure. This book is fresh and vigorous, worth thousands of lifeless

sermons and unprofitable religious journals. No prejudice or falsehood

is spared, though it may have taken refuge in the very sanctuary. Her

every shaft is well directed, every arrow powerfully sent, every shot

strikes the bull's eye in its centre. Her words are hailstones rattling

fell and fast, but melt into and soften the heart on which they fall.

Delusions disappear, cant and want of courtesy become odious, shams grow

shameful, while all lovely things bloom lovelier in the light of truth

emanating from this large brain, and poured through this living heart.

We bask in its sunshine, growing strong and happy as we read. Christian

fervor and charity, love for Redeemer and redeemed, for saint and

sinner, cheer us through all these well-deserved denunciations. Her

style is clear and rapid, her matter of daily and urgent import, her

characterizations of classes and types of men worthy of La Bruyère

himself, her satire melts into humor, her humor into pathos. She has

been attacked by some of the religious papers, and has herein taken a

true Christian and magnanimous revenge. O Gail! the clergy should open

wide their hearts to take you in, their gifted child, the iconoclast

within the temple, the faithful disciple of Christ, the lover of purity

and truth!

We quote the following brave words from this remarkable book:

'We sometimes see religious newspapers charging each other with

acts which should exclude the perpetrators from the fraternity of

_honest_ men; for, through the medium of religious newspapers, one

church, or one fraction of a church, or one ecclesiastical body, or

one member of it, accuses another of an act, or a course of action,

which, in sober truth, amounts to nothing more or less than

_obvious, persistent deception, dishonesty and trickery_.... Can

such be correct transcripts of facts? Is it true that a church, or

any body corporate, whose very existence as such is professedly to

cultivate and disseminate the principles of sound morality and true

religion, does fall so far short of the faith delivered to the

saints--does so far forget its origin, and pervert its aims, as to

violate common law and common honesty, and persist in its

violation, deliberately, against repeated remonstrances, by sheer

force? Yet we see no convulsion in the community. Nothing intimates

that a great grief is fallen upon Israel. Everybody eats, drinks,

and sleeps as usual. The pulpits still stand, and the law and the

gospel are appealed to from that vantage ground. The sacramental

cup is still raised to devout lips. The gray heads of the culprits

still go in and out among the people with no diminishing of

honor--no odium is attached to their persons; no stigmas to their

names. What a state of things does this argue! A whole church

plunges into darkness, and the

'Majestic heaven

Shines not the less for that one vanished star.'

'Can we wonder that the world will not let itself be converted? To

what should it be converted, if it were willing? Would it be an

advance for a community that sends its thieves to prison when it

catches them to merge itself in a community that is content to

print a few columns of _exposé_ on the subject? If the stream where

you wish to drink is muddy, you will scarcely find clear waters by

descending. You want to go up, not down; up on the high lands where

threads of crystal cleave the gray old rocks, and gather purity

from earth's deep bosom and the sky's clear blue.

'If it is not so, if the acts only appear dishonest because we are

looking at one side, why do we not say so, or why do we say

anything about it? Every man is to be held innocent till he is

proved guilty. If there is any standpoint from which we can view

our opponent's position and find it not dishonest, we ought to

mention it. We have no right to look at him from _a_ standpoint,

and hold him up to view as a criminal, and ignore _another_, from

which he may be seen as simply mistaken, or deceived, or blameless.

Still less have we a right to take innocent facts and construct

upon them a guilty hypothesis to suit our foregone conclusion. A

_right_ to do it? _It is sin_. _It is more than murder_. It may rob

a man of what is more precious to him than his life. It attempts to

take away from a man what, taken, would leave him stripped of his

manhood, and a man's manhood is worth more to him and his friends

than his bone and muscle.'

Ah, Gail, thy keen aim has indeed struck the pupil of the bull's eye! If

false statements of varying dogmas were held 'as criminal as they

undoubtedly are,' if they were never viewed from 'foregone conclusions,'

sects would perish in the death of misconceptions, and warring

Christians would rush into each other's arms with the joy-cry,

'Brothers!' Through the misstatements of centuries, the good Protestant

minister regards the Catholic priest, ready as he may be to die for the

faith of his fathers, as a _wilful liar_, a _conscious deceiver_,

selling the souls of his flock for a Judas bribe; while the equally good

priest, in his turn, looks upon the conscientious minister as a despiser

of authority, an enemy of the Church of Christ, refusing to hear what he

believes to be its undoubted teachings, a blind man, leading the blind

into the pit of perdition. The men may be both right from the standpoint

of their 'foregone conclusions,' both wrong from the standpoint of fact.

And so it goes on, through all the lesser sectarian divisions.

Everywhere misstatement, misconception, and smouldering hatred. The

first step to reconciliation among the antagonistic members of Christ's

torn body, would be to put into instantaneous practice the wise, sound,

and just maxims of Gail Hamilton. Let us begin it, lovers of truth and

justice!

THE MAINE WOODS. By HENRY D. THOREAU, Author of

'A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers,' 'Walden,'

'Excursions,' etc. Boston: Ticknor & Fields. For sale by D.

Appleton & Co., New York.

The first of the papers contained in this book was published in 'The

Union Magazine;' the second, 'Chesuncook,' came out in the 'Atlantic

Monthly,' in 1858; the last is now for the first time printed. The

contents of the volume are as follows: Ktaadn, Chesuncook, The Allegash

and East Branch; in the Appendix we have Trees, Flowers, and Shrubs,

List of Plants, List of Birds, Quadrupeds, Outfit for an Excursion, and

a List of Indian Words. Henry D. Thoreau was an enthusiastic lover of

nature, but no blind adorer of her loveliness. He knew her in all her

moods, was familiar with all her caprices. He was a man of strong brain,

and of accurate knowledge in such fields as it pleased him to study. The

woods have never before had such an accurate biographer, such a true

painter. He saw them with the eye of the poet as well as that of the

naturalist. Scholarship and imagination roam with him in the primeval

forests. After the most accurate and detailed description of a moose

which had been killed by his Indian guide, this anti-sentimentalist, but

true forest lover says: 'Here, just at the head of the murmuring rapids,

Joe now proceeded to skin the moose with a pocket knife, while I looked

on; and a tragical business it was--to see that still warm and

palpitating body pierced with a knife, to see the warm milk stream from

the rent udder, and the ghastly naked red carcass appearing from within

its seemly robe, which was made to hide it.' There is no joy of the

hunter here! The words are as 'tragical' and tender as were those of the

melancholy Jaques. That 'warm milk and rent udder' seems to make the

stately creature half human. He proceeds:

'But on more accounts than one, I had had enough of moose hunting.

I had not come to the woods for this purpose, nor had I foreseen

it, though I had been willing to learn how the Indian manoeuvred;

but one moose killed was as good, if not as bad, as a dozen. The

afternoon's tragedy and my share in it, as it affected the

_innocence_, destroyed the _pleasure_ of my adventure. This hunting

of the moose merely for the satisfaction of killing him--not even

for the sake of his hide--without making any extraordinary exertion

or running any risk yourself, is too much like going out by night

to some woodside pasture and shooting your neighbor's horses. These

are God's own horses, poor timid creatures, that will run fast

enough as soon as they smell you, though they are _nine_ feet high

(often eleven, with the antlers).... You strip off its hide,

because that is the common trophy, and moreover you have heard it

may be sold for mocassons--cut a steak from its body, and leave the

huge carcass 'to smell to heaven' for you. It is no better, at

least, than to assist at a slaughter house. This afternoon's

experience suggested to me how base or coarse are the motives which

commonly carry men into the wilderness. The explorers and lumberers

generally are hirelings, paid so much a day for their labor, and as

such they have no more love for wild nature than wood sawyers have

for forests. Other white men and Indians who come here are for the

most part hunters, whose object is to slay as many moose and other

wild animals as possible. But pray, could not one spend some weeks

or years in the solitude of this vast wilderness with other

employments than these--employments perfectly sweet, innocent, and

ennobling? For one that comes with a pencil to sketch or sing, a

thousand come with an axe or rifle. What a coarse and imperfect use

Indians and hunters make of nature! No wonder that their race is so

soon exterminated. I already, and for weeks afterward, felt my

nature the coarser for this part of my woodland experience, and was

reminded that our life should be lived as tenderly and daintily as

one would pluck a flower.'

Again:

'As I sat before the fire on my fir-twig seat, without walls above

or around me, I remembered how far on every hand that wilderness

stretched, before you came to cleared or cultivated fields, and

wondered if any bear or moose was watching the light of my fire;

for nature looked sternly upon me on account of the _murder of the

moose_.

'Strange that so few ever come to the woods to see how the pine

lives and grows and spires, lifting its ever-green arms to the

light--to see its perfect success; but most are content to behold

it in the shape of many broad boards brought to market, and deem

_that_ its true success. But the pine is no more lumber than man

is, and to be made into boards and houses is no more its true and

highest use, than the truest use of a man is to be cut down and

made into manure. There is a higher law affecting our relation to

pines as well as to men. A pine cut down, a dead pine, is no more a

pine than a dead human carcass is a man. Can he who has discovered

only some of the values of whalebone and whale oil be said to have

discovered the true use of the whale? Can he who slays the elephant

for his ivory be said to have 'seen the elephant'? These are petty

and accidental uses; just as if a stronger race were to kill us in

order to make buttons and flageolets of our bones; for everything

may serve a lower as well as a higher use. Every creature is better

alive than dead, men and moose and pine trees, and he who

understands it aright will rather preserve its life than destroy

it.

'Is it the lumberman, then, who is the friend and lover of the

pine, stands nearest to it, and understands its nature best? Is it

the tanner who has barked it, or he who has boxed it for

turpentine, whom posterity will fable to have changed into a pine

at last? No! no! it is the poet; he it is who makes the truest use

of the pine--who does not fondle it with an axe, nor tickle it with

a saw, nor stroke it with a plane--who knows whether its heart is

false without cutting into it--who has not bought the stumpage of

the town on which its stands. All the pines shudder and heave a

sigh when _that_ man steps on the forest floor. No, it is the poet,

who loves them as his own shadow in the air, and lets them stand. I

have been into the lumber yard, the carpenter's shop, the tannery,

the lamp-black factory, and the turpentine clearing; but when at

length I saw the tops of the pines waving and reflecting the light

at a distance over all the rest of the forest, I realized that the

former were not the highest use of the pine. It is not their bones

or hide or tallow that I love most. It is the living spirit of the

tree, not its spirit of turpentine, with which I sympathize, and

which heals my cuts. It is as immortal as I am, and, perchance, may

go to as high a heaven, there to tower above me still.'

Reader, was not this man a nature lover, a nature limner, worthy to take

his place among our Giffords, Whittredges, McEntees, Bierstadts, and

Beards? Truly original, natural, and American, who among our descriptive

writers can surpass H. D. Thoreau?

PRIMARY LESSONS FOR DEAF MUTES. By J. A. JACOBS,

A. M., Principal of the Kentucky Institution for the Education of

Deaf Mutes. New York: John F. Trow, Printer & Publisher, 50 Greene

street, between Broome & Grand. 1864.

An excellent little work, intended to impart some of the rudimentary

branches of learning to that interesting class of our fellow beings who

can neither speak nor hear. Every effort made for their instruction

should be cordially welcomed, for sad indeed is their position, and very

difficult the discovery of means to reach and develop their often very

bright intelligence. These lessons can be used by parents, guardians, or

elder brothers and sisters, before the deaf-mute child is old enough to

send to a regular institution. They are divided into two parts, bound in

separate little volumes, and _filled_ with cuts illustrating the

text--or rather, the text, as is proper in such a work, illustrates the

cuts, which occupy the larger portion of the book. Teachers cannot but

find these aids of incalculable value.

THE RELATIONS OF THE INDUSTRY OF CANADA WITH THE MOTHER COUNTRY

AND THE UNITED STATES. Being a Speech by ISAAC

BUCHANAN, Esq., M. P., as delivered at the late Demonstration

to the Parliamentary Opposition at Toronto; together with a series

of Articles in defence of the National Sentiments contained

therein, which originally appeared in the columns of the _Hamilton

Spectator_, from the pen of Mr. Buchanan; to which is added a

Speech delivered by him at the Dinner given to the Pioneers of

Upper Canada, at London, Canada West, 10th December, 1863. Now

first published in complete and collected form, with copious Notes

and Annotations, besides an extended Introductory Explanation, and

an Appendix containing various valuable Documents. Edited by

HENRY J. MORGAN, Corresponding Member of the New York

Historical Society, and Author of 'Sketches of Celebrated

Canadians.' Montreal: Printed by John Lovell, St. Nicholas. 1864.

We recommend this book to such of our readers as may be interested in

political economy, not as sound in theory, but as containing a vast

array of facts and giving considerable information with regard to the

internal affairs of our neighbor Canada. The Reciprocity Treaty comes in

for its share of consideration. Mr. Buchanan is a Protectionist, and

uses the arguments of his party with considerable ability. The question

of annexation is also incidentally touched upon. We do not know that we

can give our readers a better idea of the contents and policy of this

book than by placing the dedication before them.

'To the leaders of the forthcoming Party of Order, I dedicate these

pages, because I feel that the province is at the winning or the

losing, and that we shall hereafter have to hail you as the honored

instruments of our Political and Industrial salvation.

'In Mr. Buchanan's Letter to the Editor of the Globe, assuring him

publicly that Mr. Buchanan and all his friends, as in the Past, so

in the Future, would be found opponents to the death of Annexation,

and not its friends, as that journal basely insinuated, he states

that he is of no party, though reluctantly compelled to be in

opposition to the present ministry in consequence of their acts,

Executive as well as Legislative; but that he is of a class far

more numerous than the 'thick and thin' adherents of either of the

present _soi-disant_ parties. Those alluded to by Mr. Buchanan will

form a new party--the Party of Order, which will probably be called

the 'Constitutional Party'--its platform being broad enough to hold

all who value and respect the time-honored Constitution, whether

they be original Reformers or Conservatives in name. The new Party

of Order will comprise these elements:

'First. Conservative Liberals, or old Reformers, who have been

taught by experience, and are willing now to adopt the word

'Conservative,' at least in its adjective sense.

'Secondly. Liberal Conservatives, or old Tories, or their

descendants, who have also been taught by experience, and are

willing to adopt the word 'Liberal,' at least in its adjective

sense.

'Thirdly. Conservatives, and Conservative Liberals, who have

unwittingly been mingled up with the incendiary party, composed of

'Clear Grits' and 'Rouges.'

'And that in your discussions on the great question of the

Reciprocity Law, now about to agitate both Canada and the United

States, these pages may be of some service, is the fond hope of

your obedient servant,

'THE EDITOR.'

FAMILY PRIDE. By the Author of 'Pique.' Philadelphia: T.

B. Peterson & Brothers, 306 Chestnut street.

Family Pride is a novel of still greater interest than 'Pique.' The plot

is well conceived, the characters skilfully developed, and the attention

is fascinated even to the end. The moral is unexceptionable, the style

fresh and pure. We must however enter an earnest protest against the

manifest injustice of the closing sentence, where the talented author

has gone out of his way to find a blot for his book, the only stain upon

his fair pages. It reads thus: 'After a variety of vicissitudes, she had

embraced the Romish faith: that religion which relieves from all

personal responsibility in spiritual matters; and which teaches that

earthly penance and ascetic observances will open the gates of heaven to

the vilest of criminals.' We have studied Westminster, Episcopal, and

Catholic catechisms, the teachings in all three of which are that faith

in Christ and sorrow for and renunciation of sin alone can open the

gates of heaven. We regard it as the duty of a conscientious reviewer to

point out an erroneous statement wherever it occurs, whether in regard

to the faith of Protestants, Catholics, Hebrews, Mohammedans, Fire

Worshippers, or any other classes of men whatsoever. Misstatement has

caused an immense deal of bloodshed and bitterness among Christians. The

walls of Zion must be built of the stones of truth.

THE TANNER BOY, AND HOW HE BECAME LIEUTENANT-GENERAL. By

MAJOR PENNIMAN. 'The boy is father to the man.' Fifth

thousand. Boston: Roberts Brothers, publishers, 143 Washington

street. 1864.

A lively account of the boyhood and subsequent career of one likely to

be famous in American history. The nation's eyes are at this moment

turned hopefully upon the result of Gen. Grant's campaign in Virginia,

and all will be glad to learn that his previous life offers so fair and

pleasant a record. One observation, however, we feel called upon to make

to the entertaining Major: the youth of America should be taught to

love, to live for, and, if need be, to die for their country; but they

should also be taught to shun narrow exclusiveness and boastful vanity.

A government of a whole people should in this respect set a noble

example to all other nations.

The 'Tanner Boy' has already reached its 'fifth thousand,' and will no

doubt be eagerly read by all the patriotic boys and girls in the land.

WAX FLOWERS. J. E. Tilton & Co., Boston. 1864.

This little book contains somewhat over a hundred pages, and is gotten

up in the attractive style for which the publications of this firm have

become noted. A prefatory chapter sets forth the object of the work, and

the claims of the art. The first part treats of Wax Fruit, giving the

methods of making moulds and casting therefrom, of preparing the wax, of

coloring the fruit and giving it the proper outward texture. The second

part describes all the articles and materials required for making even

the most elaborate of WAX FLOWERS; gives the way of preparing

the wax, including its formation into sheets of any required thickness,

with all the minutiæ relating to coloring, &c. The text is clearly and

simply written, and by the aid of ample illustrations everything is made

plain to the learner.

It is wonderful how exquisitely flowers may be imitated--making one wish

a device for the secreting of the appropriate perfumes.

The wax once gathered by bees through many a bower,

Glows again in the form of a beautiful flower.

The artist in wax enjoys the best of opportunities for learning Botany,

both analytically and synthetically. A series of models in wax would

make the ocular study of botany possible throughout the year. The taste

for wax flowers is becoming widely extended, and high prices are brought

by the finest specimens of the art. Humanity should heartily welcome an

employment which enables many to escape the suicide of the needle!

DENISE. By the Author of 'Mademoiselle Mori.' In two vols.

New York: James G. Gregory, 540 Broadway.

There is a strange charm about this book. The story is common enough,

the characters have nothing original in their conception, and yet we are

fascinated by the detailed truth of the portraiture from the first page

to the last. The scenes are laid in Farnoux, a town in the old Provençal

districts. The ancient views and manners are still retained, and

interest us by the force of contrast with our own. Mademoiselle Le

Marchand, an odd old maid, with a genius for painting, is really the

character of the book. Denise, the heroine, is quietly and faithfully

drawn. Various picturesque phases of the Catholic faith are artistically

managed, while the faith itself is not treated with much courtesy. As a

general thing we do not like theological novels written from foregone

conclusions. We can imagine however that such a subject might be made

intensely interesting. If a master mind of perfect impartiality would

give us the effect produced upon two minds of equal mental power, of

equal moral worth, by Protestantism or Catholicity--such a study would

both interest and instruct. All religious nicknames should be avoided,

as offensive both to charity and refined taste. Episcopalians do not

like to be called Anglicans; Friends, Quakers; Baptists, Hardshells;

Unitarians, Pantheists; nor Catholics, Romanists. Let us use courtesy to

all men, that so we may have more weight when we attack erroneous

principles.

By all means read Denise; its studies of the heart are close and

accurate.

The Continental Monthly, Vol. 6, No 2, August, 1864 Devoted to Literature and National Policy · 第 41 / 43 题