CHAPTER I -- THE RISING STORM.

Produced by John Bechard

HISTORY OF THE MORAVIAN CHURCH

by J. E. Hutton

(Second Edition, Revised and Enlarged.)

1909

Transcriber's Note: I have inserted a few notes of my own regarding

spelling (one Greek word) and the rearranging of dates that were

originally shown in the margins of the book; any of my own adjustments

or notes have been enclosed in these brackets: {} to separate them from

the original text. As well, I have renumbered all the footnotes from

their corresponding pages and set them at the end of this document.

BOOK ONE.

The Bohemian Brethren. 1457-1673

CHAPTER I.--The Rising Storm

" II.--The Burning of Hus. July 6th, 1415

" III.--The Welter. 1415-1434

" IV.--Peter of Chelcic. 1419-1450

" V.--Gregory the Patriarch and the Society at Kunwald.

1457-1472

" VI.--Luke of Prague and the High Church Reaction. 1473-1530

" VII.--The Brethren at Home.

" VIII.--John Augusta and His Policy. 1531-1548

" IX.--The Brethren in Poland. 1548-1570

" X.--The Martyr Bishop. 1548-1560

" XI.--The Last Days of Augusta. 1560-1572

" XII.--The Golden Age. 1572-1603

" XIII.--The Letter of Majesty. 1603-1609

" XIV.--The Downfall. 1609-1621

" XV.--The Day of Blood at Prague. June 21st, 1621

" XVI.--Comenius and the Hidden Seed. 1621-1673

BOOK TWO.

The Revival under Zinzendorf. 1700-1760.

CHAPTER I.--The Youth of Count Zinzendorf. 1700-1722

" II.--Christian David. 1690-1722

" III.--The Founding of Herrnhut. 1722-1727

" IV.--Life at Herrnhut

" V.--The Edict of Banishment. 1727-1736

" VI.--The Foreign Missions and their Influence. 1732-1760

" VII.--The Pilgrim Band. 1736-1743

" VIII.--The Sifting Time. 1743-1750

" IX.--Moravians and Methodists. 1735-1742

" X.--Yorkshire and the Settlement System. 1742-1755

" XI.--The Labours of John Cennick. 1739-1755

" XII.--The Appeal to Parliament. 1742-1749

" XIII.--The Battle of the Books. 1749-1755

" XIV.--The American Experiments. 1734-1762

" XV.--The Last Days of Zinzendorf. 1755-1760

BOOK THREE.

The Rule of the Germans. 1760-1857.

CHAPTER I.--The Church and Her Mission; or The Three Constitutional

Synods. 1760-1775

" II.--The Fight for the Gospel; or, Moravians and

Rationalists. 1775-1800

" III.--A Fall and a Recovery. 1800-1857

" IV.--The British Collapse. 1760-1800

" V.--The British Advance. 1800-1857

" VI.--The Struggle in America. 1762-1857

" VII.--The Separation of the Provinces 1857-1899

BOOK FOUR.

The Modern Moravians. 1857-1908.

CHAPTER I.--Moravian Principles

" II.--The Moravians in Germany

" III.--The Moravians in Great Britain

" IV.--The Moravians in North America

" V.--Bonds of Union

PREFACE.

For assistance in the preparation of this second edition, I desire

herewith to express my obligations to several friends:--To the late Rev.

L. G. Hassé, B.D., whose knowledge of Moravian history was profound, and

who guided me safely in many matters of detail; to the Rev. N. Libbey,

M.A., Principal of the Moravian Theological College, Fairfield, for the

loan of valuable books; to the Rev. J. T. Müller, D.D., Archivist

at Herrnhut, for revising part of the MS., and for many helpful

suggestions; to Mr. W. T. Waugh, M.A., for assistance in correcting the

proof-sheets, and for much valuable criticism; to the members of the

Moravian Governing Board, not only for the loan of books and documents

from the Fetter Lane archives, but also for carefully reading through

the MS.; to the ministers who kindly supplied my pulpit for three

months; and last, but not least, to the members of my own congregation,

who relieved me from some pastoral duties to enable me to make good

speed with my task.

MORAVIAN MANSE,

HECKMONDWIKE.

BOOK ONE. THE BOHEMIAN BRETHREN.

CHAPTER I -- THE RISING STORM.

When an ordinary Englishman, in the course of his reading, sees mention

made of Moravians, he thinks forthwith of a foreign land, a foreign

people and a foreign Church. He wonders who these Moravians may be,

and wonders, as a rule, in vain. We have all heard of the Protestant

Reformation; we know its principles and admire its heroes; and the

famous names of Luther, Calvin, Melancthon, Latimer, Cranmer, Knox and

other great men are familiar in our ears as household words. But few

people in this country are aware of the fact that long before Luther had

burned the Pope's bull, and long before Cranmer died at the stake, there

had begun an earlier Reformation, and flourished a Reforming Church. It

is to tell the story of that Church--the Church of the Brethren--that

this little book is written.

For her cradle and her earliest home we turn to the distressful land

of Bohemia, and the people called Bohemians, or Czechs. To us English

readers Bohemia has many charms. As we call to mind our days at school,

we remember, in a dim and hazy way, how famous Bohemians in days of yore

have played some part in our national story. We have sung the praises at

Christmas time of the Bohemian Monarch, "Good King Wenceslaus." We have

read how John, the blind King of Bohemia, fell mortally wounded at the

Battle of Crecy, how he died in the tent of King Edward III., and how

his generous conqueror exclaimed: "The crown of chivalry has fallen

today; never was the like of this King of Bohemia." We have all read,

too, how Richard II. married Princess Anne of Bohemia; how the Princess,

so the story goes, brought a Bohemian Bible to England; how Bohemian

scholars, a few years later, came to study at Oxford; how there they

read the writings of Wycliffe, the "Morning Star of the Reformation";

and how, finally, copies of Wycliffe's books were carried to Bohemia,

and there gave rise to a religious revival of world-wide importance.

We have struck the trail of our journey. For one person that Wycliffe

stirred in England, he stirred hundreds in Bohemia. In England his

influence was fleeting; in Bohemia it was deep and abiding. In England

his followers were speedily suppressed by law; in Bohemia they became

a great national force, and prepared the way for the foundation of the

Church of the Brethren.

For this startling fact there was a very powerful reason. In many ways

the history of Bohemia is very like the history of Ireland, and the best

way to understand the character of the people is to think of our Irish

friends as we know them to-day. They sprang from the old Slavonic stock,

and the Slavonic is very like the Keltic in nature. They had fiery

Slavonic blood in their veins, and Slavonic hearts beat high with hope

in their bosoms. They had all the delightful Slavonic zeal, the Slavonic

dash, the Slavonic imagination. They were easy to stir, they were swift

in action, they were witty in speech, they were mystic and poetic in

soul, and, like the Irish of the present day, they revelled in the joy

of party politics, and discussed religious questions with the keenest

zest. With them religion came first and foremost. All their poetry was

religious; all their legends were religious; and thus the message of

Wycliffe fell on hearts prepared to give it a kindly welcome.

Again, Bohemia, like Ireland, was the home of two rival populations. The

one was the native Czech, the other was the intruding German; and the

two had not yet learned to love each other. From all sides except one

these German invaders had come. If the reader will consult a map of

Europe he will see that, except on the south-east frontier, where the

sister country, Moravia, lies, Bohemia is surrounded by German-speaking

States. On the north-east is Silesia, on the north-west Saxony, on the

west Bavaria and the Upper Palatinate, and thus Bohemia was flooded

with Germans from three sides at once. For years these Germans had

been increasing in power, and the whole early history of Bohemia is

one dreary succession of bloody wars against German Emperors and Kings.

Sometimes the land had been ravaged by German soldiers, sometimes a

German King had sat on the Bohemian throne. But now the German settlers

in Bohemia had become more powerful than ever. They had settled in large

numbers in the city of Prague, and had there obtained special privileges

for themselves. They had introduced hundreds of German clergymen, who

preached in the German language. They had married their daughters into

noble Bohemian families. They had tried to make German the language of

the court, had spoken with contempt of the Bohemian language, and had

said that it was only fit for slaves. They had introduced German laws

into many a town, and German customs into family life; and, worse than

all, they had overwhelming power in that pride of the country, the

University of Prague. For these Germans the hatred of the people was

intense. "It is better," said one of their popular writers, "for the

land to be a desert than to be held by Germans; it is better to marry a

Bohemian peasant girl than to marry a German queen." And Judas Iscariot

himself, said a popular poet, was in all probability a German.

Again, as in Ireland, these national feuds were mixed up with religious

differences. The seeds of future strife were early sown. Christianity

came from two opposite sources. On the one hand, two preachers, Cyril

and Methodius, had come from the Greek Church in Constantinople, had

received the blessing of the Pope, and had preached to the people in the

Bohemian language; on the other, the German Archbishop of Salzburg had

brought in hosts of German priests, and had tried in vain to persuade

the Pope to condemn the two preachers as heretics. And the people loved

the Bohemian preachers, and hated the German priests. The old feud was

raging still. If the preacher spoke in German, he was hated; if he spoke

in Bohemian, he was beloved; and Gregory VII. had made matters worse by

forbidding preaching in the language of the people.

The result can be imagined. It is admitted now by all

historians--Catholic and Protestant alike--that about the time when our

story opens the Church in Bohemia had lost her hold upon the affections

of the people. It is admitted that sermons the people could understand

were rare. It is admitted that the Bible was known to few, that the

services held in the parish churches had become mere senseless shows,

and that most of the clergy never preached at all. No longer were

the clergy examples to their flocks. They hunted, they gambled, they

caroused, they committed adultery, and the suggestion was actually

solemnly made that they should be provided with concubines.

For some years a number of pious teachers had made gallant but vain

attempts to cleanse the stables. The first was Conrad of Waldhausen,

an Augustinian Friar (1364-9). As this man was a German and spoke in

German, it is not likely that he had much effect on the common people,

but he created quite a sensation in Prague, denounced alike the vices of

the clergy and the idle habits of the rich, persuaded the ladies of high

degree to give up their fine dresses and jewels, and even caused certain

well-known sinners to come and do penance in public.

The next was Milic of Kremsir (1363-74). He was a Bohemian, and

preached in the Bohemian language. His whole life was one of noble

self-sacrifice. For the sake of the poor he renounced his position as

Canon, and devoted himself entirely to good works. He rescued thousands

of fallen women, and built them a number of homes. He was so disgusted

with the evils of his days that he thought the end of the world was

close at hand, declared that the Emperor, Charles IV., was Anti-Christ,

went to Rome to expound his views to the Pope, and posted up a notice on

the door of St. Peter's, declaring that Anti-Christ had come.

The next was that beautiful writer, Thomas of Stitny (1370-1401). He

exalted the Holy Scriptures as the standard of faith, wrote several

beautiful devotional books, and denounced the immorality of the monks.

"They have fallen away from love," he said; "they have not the peace of

God in their hearts; they quarrel, condemn and fight each other; they

have forsaken God for money."

In some ways these three Reformers were all alike. They were all men

of lofty character; they all attacked the vices of the clergy and the

luxury of the rich; and they were all loyal to the Church of Rome, and

looked to the Pope to carry out the needed reform.

But the next Reformer, Matthew of Janow, carried the movement further

(1381-93). The cause was the famous schism in the Papacy. For the long

period of nearly forty years (1378-1415) the whole Catholic world was

shocked by the scandal of two, and sometimes three, rival Popes, who

spent their time abusing and fighting each other. As long as this schism

lasted it was hard for men to look up to the Pope as a true spiritual

guide. How could men call the Pope the Head of the Church when no one

knew which was the true Pope? How could men respect the Popes when

some of the Popes were men of bad moral character? Pope Urban VI. was

a ferocious brute, who had five of his enemies secretly murdered; Pope

Clement VII., his clever rival, was a scheming politician; and Pope John

XXIII. was a man whose character will scarcely bear describing in print.

Of all the scandals in the Catholic Church, this disgraceful quarrel

between rival Popes did most to upset the minds of good men and to

prepare the way for the Reformation. It aroused the scorn of John

Wycliffe in England, and of Matthew of Janow in Bohemia. "This schism,"

he wrote, "has not arisen because the priests loved Jesus Christ and His

Church, but rather because they loved themselves and the world."

But Matthew went even further than this. As he did not attack any

Catholic dogma--except the worship of pictures and images--it has been

contended by some writers that he was not so very radical in his views

after all; but the whole tone of his writings shows that he had lost

his confidence in the Catholic Church, and desired to revive the simple

Christianity of Christ and the Apostles. "I consider it essential," he

wrote, "to root out all weeds, to restore the word of God on earth,

to bring back the Church of Christ to its original, healthy, condensed

condition, and to keep only such regulations as date from the time of

the Apostles." "All the works of men," he added, "their ceremonies and

traditions, shall soon be totally destroyed; the Lord Jesus shall alone

be exalted, and His Word shall stand for ever." Back to Christ! Back to

the Apostles! Such was the message of Matthew of Janow.

At this point, when the minds of men were stirred, the writings of

Wycliffe were brought to Bohemia, and added fuel to the fire. He had

asserted that the Pope was capable of committing a sin. He had

declared that the Pope was not to be obeyed unless his commands were

in accordance with Scripture, and thus had placed the authority of the

Bible above the authority of the Pope. He had attacked the Doctrine of

Transubstantiation, and had thus denied the power of the priests "to

make the Body of Christ." Above all, in his volume, "De Ecclesia," he

had denounced the whole Catholic sacerdotal system, and had laid down

the Protestant doctrine that men could come into contact with God

without the aid of priests. Thus step by step the way was prepared for

the coming revolution in Bohemia. There was strong patriotic national

feeling; there was hatred of the German priests; there was a growing

love for the Bible; there was lack of respect for the immoral clergy,

and lack of belief in the Popes; there was a vague desire to return to

Primitive Christianity; and all that was needed now was a man to gather

these straggling beams together, and focus them all in one white burning

light.

A History of the Moravian Church · 第 1 / 21 章