CHAPTER V--THE COLONIES

Circumstances which led the Phoenicians to colonise--Their

colonies best grouped geographically--1. Colonies of the

Eastern Mediterranean--in Cyprus, Citium, Amathus, Curium,

Paphos, Salamis, Ammochosta, Tamisus, and Soli;--in Cilicia,

Tarsus;--in Lycia, Phaselis;--in Rhodes, Lindus, Ialysus,

Camirus;--in Crete, and the Cyclades;--in the Northern

Egean; &c. 2. In the Central and Western Mediterranean--in

Africa, Utica, Hippo-Zaritis, Hippo Regius, Carthage,

Hadrumetum, Leptis Minor, Leptis Major, and Thapsus;--in

Sicily, Motya, Eryx, Panormus, Solocis;--between Sicily and

Africa, Cossura, Gaulos, and Melita;--in Sardinia, Caralis,

Nora, Sulcis, and Tharros;--in the Balearic Isles;--in

Spain, Malaca, Sex, Abdera. 3. Outside the Straits of

Gibraltar;--in Africa, Tingis, and Lixus; in Spain,

Tartessus, Gades, and Belon--Summary.

The narrowness of the territory which the Phoenicians occupied the

military strength of their neighbours towards the north and towards the

south, and their own preference of maritime over agricultural pursuits,

combined to force them, as they began to increase and multiply, to

find a vent for their superfluous population in colonies. The military

strength of Philistia and Egypt barred them out from expansion upon

the south; the wild savagery of the mountain races in Casius, northern

Bargylus, and Amanus was an effectual barrier towards the north; but

before them lay the open Mediterranean, placid during the greater

portion of the year, and conducting to a hundred lands, thinly peopled,

or even unoccupied, where there was ample room for any number of

immigrants. The trade of the Phoenicians with the countries bordering

the Eastern Mediterranean must be regarded as established long

previously to the time when they began to feel cramped for space; and

thus, when that time arrived, they had no difficulty in finding fresh

localities to occupy, except such as might arise from a too abundant

amplitude of choice. Right in front of them lay, at the distance of not

more than seventy miles, visible from Casius in clear weather,[51] the

large and important island, once known as Chittim,[52] and afterwards as

Cyprus, which played so important a part in the history of the East from

the time of Sargon and Sennacherib to that of Bragadino and Mustapha

Pasha. To the right, well visible from Cyprus, was the fertile tract of

Cilicia Campestris, which led on to the rich and picturesque regions of

Pamphylia, Lycia, and Caria. From Caria stretched out, like a string

of stepping-stones between Asia and Europe, the hundred islets of

the Ægean, Cyclades, and Sporades, and others, inviting settlers, and

conducting to the large islands of Crete and Euboea, and the shores of

Attica and the Peloponnese. It is impossible to trace with any exactness

the order in which the Phoenician colonies were founded. A thousand

incidental circumstances--a thousand caprices--may have deranged what

may be called the natural or geographical order, and have caused

the historical order to diverge from it; but, on the whole, probably

something like the geographical order was observed; and, at any rate, it

will be most convenient, in default of sufficient data for an historical

arrangement, to adopt in the present place a geographic one, and,

beginning with those nearest to Phoenicia itself in the Eastern

Mediterranean, to proceed westward to the Straits of Gibraltar,

reserving for the last those outside the Straits on the shores of the

Atlantic Ocean.

The nearest, and probably the first, region to attract Phoenician

colonies was the island of Cyprus. Cyprus lies in the corner of the

Eastern Mediterranean formed by the projection of Asia Minor from the

Syrian shore. Its mountain chains run parallel with Taurus, and it is

to Asia Minor that it presents its longer flank, while to Phoenicia it

presents merely one of its extremities. Its length from east to west is

145 miles, its greatest width about sixty miles.[53] Two strongly marked

mountain ranges form its most salient features, the one running close

along the north coast from Cape Kormaciti to Cape S. Andreas; the other

nearly central, but nearer the south, beginning at Cape Renaouti in the

west and terminating at Cape Greco. The mountain ranges are connected

by a tract of high ground towards the centre, and separated by two broad

plains,[54] towards the east and west. The eastern plain is the more

important of the two. It extends along the course of the Pediæus from

Leucosia, or Nicosia, the present capital, to Salamis, a distance of

thirty-five miles, and is from five to twelve miles wide. The fertility

of the soil was reckoned in ancient times to equal that of Egypt.[55]

The western plain, that of Morfou, is much smaller, and is watered by

a less important river. The whole island, when it first became known to

the Phoenicians, was well wooded.[56] Lovely glens opened upon them, as

they sailed along its southern coast, watered by clear streams from the

southern mountain-range, and shaded by thick woods of pine and cedar,

the latter of which are said to have in some cases attained a greater

size even than those of the Lebanon.[57] The range was also prolific of

valuable metals.[58] Gold and silver were found in places, but only in

small quantities; iron was yielded in considerable abundance; but the

chief supply was that of copper, which derived its name from that of

the island.[59] Other products of the island were wheat of excellent

quality; the rich Cyprian wine which retains its strength and flavour

for well nigh a century, the _henna_ dye obtained from the plant called

_copher_ or _cyprus_, the _Lawsonia alba_ of modern botany; valuable

pigments of various kinds, red, yellow, green, and amber; hemp and flax;

tar, boxwood,[510] and all the materials requisite for shipbuilding

from the heavy timbers needed for the keel to the lightest spar and the

flimsiest sail.[511]

The earliest of the Phoenician settlements in Cyprus seem to have lain

upon its southern coast. Here were Citium, Amathus, Curium, and Paphus,

the Palæ-paphus of the geographers, which have all yielded abundant

traces of a Phoenician occupation at a very distant period. Citium, now

Larnaka, was on the western side of a deep bay, which indents the more

eastern portion of the southern coast, between the promontories of Citi

and Pyla. It is sheltered from all winds except the south-east,

and continues to the present day the chief port of the island. The

Phoenician settlers improved on the natural position by the formation

of an artificial basin, enclosed within piers, the lines of which may be

traced, though the basin itself is sanded up.[512] A plain extends for

some distance inland, on which the palm-tree flourishes, and which

is capable of producing excellent crops of wheat.[513] Access to the

interior is easy; for the mountain range sinks as it proceeds eastward,

and between Citium and Dali (Idalium), on a tributary of the Pediæus, is

of small elevation. There are indications that the Phoenicians did not

confine themselves to the coast, but penetrated into the interior, and

even settled there in large numbers. Idalium, sixteen miles north-west

of Citium, and Golgi (Athiénau), ten miles nearly due north of the

same, show traces of having supported for a considerable time a large

Phoenician population,[514] and must be regarded as outposts advanced

from Citium into the mountains for trading, and perhaps for mining

purposes. Idalium (Dali) has a most extensive Phoenician necropolis; the

interments have a most archaic character; and their Phoenician origin

is indicated both by their close resemblance to interments in Phoenicia

proper and by the discovery, in connection with them, of Phoenician

inscriptions.[515] At Golgi the remains scarcely claim so remote an

antiquity. They belong to the time when Phoenician art was dominated by

a strong Egyptian influence, and when it also begins to have a partially

Hellenic character. Some critics assign them to the sixth, or even to

the fifth century, B.C.[516]

West of Citium, also upon the south coast, and in a favourable situation

for trade with the interior, was Amathus. The name Amathus has been

connected with “Hamath;”[517] but there is no reason to suppose that the

Hamathites were Phoenicians. Amathus, which Stephen of Byzantium calls

“a most ancient Cyprian city,”[518] was probably among the earliest of

the Phoenician settlements in the island. It lay in the bay formed by

the projection of Cape Gatto from the coast, and, like Citium, looked

to the south-east. Westward and south-westward stretched an extensive

plain, fertile and well-watered, shaded by carob and olive-trees,[519]

whilst towards the north were the rich copper mines from which the

Amathusians derived much of their prosperity. The site has yielded a

considerable amount of Phoenician remains--tombs, sarcophagi, vases,

bowls, pateræ and statuettes.[520] Many of the tombs resemble those

at Idalium; others are stone chambers deeply buried in the earth. The

mimetic art shows Assyrian and Egyptian influence, but is essentially

Phoenician, and of great interest. Further reference will be made to it

in the Chapter on the Æsthetic Art of the Phoenicians.

Still further to the west, in the centre of the bay enclosed between

the promontories of Zeugari and Boosoura, was the colony of Curium, on

a branch of the river Kuras. Curium lay wholly open to the

south-western-gales, but had a long stretch of sandy shore towards the

south-east, on which vessels could be drawn up. The town was situated

on a rocky elevation, 300 feet in height, and was further defended by

a strong wall, a large portion of which may still be traced.[521] The

richest discovery of Phoenician ornaments and objects of art that has

yet been made took place at Curium, where, in the year 1874, General Di

Cesnola happened upon a set of “Treasure Chambers” containing several

hundreds of rings, gems, necklaces, bracelets, armlets, ear-rings,

bowls, basins, jugs, pateræ, &c., in the precious metals, which have

formed the principal material for all recent disquisitions on the true

character and excellency of Phoenician art. Commencing with works of

which the probable date is the fifteenth or sixteenth century B.C.,

and descending at least as far as the best Greek period[522] (B.C.

500-400), embracing, moreover, works which are purely Assyrian, purely

Egyptian, and purely Greek, this collection has yet so predominant a

Phoenician character as to mark Curium, notwithstanding the contrary

assertions of the Greeks themselves,[523] for a thoroughly Phoenician

town. And the history of the place confirms this view, since Curium

sided with Amathus and the Persians in the war of Onesilus.[524] No

doubt, like most of the other Phoenician cities in Cyprus, it was

Hellenised gradually; but there must have been many centuries during

which it was an emporium of Phoenician trade and a centre of Phoenician

influence.

Where the southern coast of Cyprus begins to trend to the north-west,

and a river of some size, the Bocarus or Diorizus, reaches the sea,

stood the Phoenician settlement of Paphos, founded (as was said[525]) by

Cinyras, king of Byblus. Here was one of the most celebrated of all the

temples of Astarté or Ashtoreth,[526] the Phoenician Nature-Goddess; and

here ruled for many centuries the sacerdotal class of the Cinyridæ. The

remains of the temple have been identified, and will be described in a

future chapter. They have the massive character of all early Phoenician

architecture.

Among other Phoenician settlements in Cyprus were, it is probable,

Salamis, Ammochosta (now Famagosta), Tamasus, and Soli. Salamis must be

regarded as originally Phoenician on account of the name, which cannot

be viewed as anything but another form of the Hebrew “Salem,” the

alternative name of Jerusalem.[527] Salamis lay on the eastern coast of

the island at the mouth of the main river, the Pediæus. It occupied

the centre of a large bay which looked towards Phoenicia, and would

naturally be the place where the Phoenicians would first land. There is

no natural harbour beyond that afforded by the mouth of the Pediæus,

but a harbour was easily made by throwing out piers into the bay; and of

this, which is now sanded up, the outline may be traced.[528] There

are, however, no remains, either at Salamis or in the immediate

neighbourhood, which can claim to be regarded as Phoenician; and the

glories of the city belong to the history of Greece.

Ammochosta was situated within a few miles of Salamis, towards the

south.[529] Its first appearance in history belongs to the reign of

Esarhaddon (B.C. 680), when we find it in a list of ten Cyprian cities,

each having its own king, who acknowledged for their suzerain the great

monarch of Assyria.[530] Soon afterwards it again occurs among the

cities tributary to Asshur-bani-pal.[531] Otherwise we have no mention

of it in Phoenician times. As Famagosta it was famous in the wars

between the Venetians and the Turks.

Tamasus, or Tamassus, was an inland city, and the chief seat of the

mining operations which the Phoenicians carried on in the island in

search of copper.[532] It lay a few miles to the west of Idalium (Dali),

on the northern flank of the southern mountain chain. The river Pediæus

flowed at its feet. Like Ammochosta, it appears among the Cyprian towns

which in the seventh century B.C. were tributary to the Assyrians.[533]

The site is still insufficiently explored.

Soli lay upon the coast, in the recess of the gulf of Morfou.[534] The

fiction of its foundation by Philocyprus at the suggestion of Solon[535]

is entirely disproved by the occurrence of the name in the Assyrian

lists of Cyprian towns a century before Solon’s time. Its sympathies

were with the Phoenician, and not with the Hellenic, population of the

island, as was markedly shown when it joined with Amathus and Citium in

calling to Artaxerxes for help against Evagoras.[536] The city stood on

the left bank of the river Clarius, and covered the northern slope of

a low hill detached from the main range, extending also over the low

ground at the foot of the hill to within a short distance of the shore,

where are to be seen the remains of the ancient harbour. The soil in

the neighbourhood is very rich, and adapted for almost any kind of

cultivation.[537] In the mountains towards the south were prolific veins

of copper.

The northern coast of the island between Capes Cormaciti and S. Andreas

does not seem to have attracted the Phoenicians, though there are some

who regard Lapethus and Cerynia as Phoenician settlements.[538] It is a

rock-bound shore of no very tempting aspect, behind which the mountain

range rises up steeply. Such Phoenician emigrants as held their way

along the Salaminian plain and, rounding Cape S. Andreas, passed into

the channel that separates Cyprus from the mainland, found the coast

upon their right attract them far more than that upon their left, and

formed settlements in Cilicia which ultimately became of considerable

importance. The chief of these was Tars or Tarsus, probably the Tarshish

of Genesis,[539] though not that of the later Books, a Phoenician city,

which has Phoenician characters upon its coins, and worshipped the

supreme Phoenician deity under the title of “Baal Tars,” “the Lord of

Tarsus.”[540] Tarsus commanded the rich Cilician plain up to the very

roots of Taurus, was watered by the copious stream of the Cydnus, and

had at its mouth a commodious harbour. Excellent timber for shipbuilding

grew on the slopes of the hills bounding the plain, and the river

afforded a ready means of floating such timber down to the sea.

Cleopatra’s ships are said to have been derived from the Cilician

forests, which Antony made over to her for the purpose.[541] Other

Phoenician settlements upon the Cilician coast were, it is probable,

Soli, Celenderis, and Nagidus.

Pursuing their way westward, in search of new abodes, the emigrants

would pass along the coast, first of Pamphylia and then of Lycia. In

Pamphylia there is no settlement that can be with confidence assigned

to them; but in Lycia it would seem that they colonised Phaselis,

and perhaps other places. The mountain which rises immediately behind

Phaselis was called “Solyma;”[542] and a very little to the south was

another mountain known as “Phoenicus.”[543] Somewhat further to the west

lies the cape still called Cape Phineka,[544] in which the root Phoenix

({phoinix}) is again to be detected. A large district inland was named

Cabalis or Cabalia,[545] or (compare Phoen. and Heb. _gebal_, mod. Arab.

_jebel_) the “mountain” country. Phaselis was situated on a promontory

projecting south-eastward into the Mediterranean,[546] and was reckoned

to have three harbours,[547] which are marked in the accompanying chart.

Of these the principal one was that on the western side of the isthmus,

which was formed by a stone pier carried out for more than two hundred

yards into the sea, and still to be traced under the water.[548]

The other two, which were of smaller size, lay towards the east. The

Phoenicians were probably tempted to make a settlement at the place,

partly by the three ports, partly by the abundance of excellent timber

for shipbuilding which the neighbourhood furnishes. “Between Phaselis

and Cape Avora, a little north of it,” says a modern traveller, “a belt

of large and handsome pines borders the shore for some miles.”[549]

From Lycia the Asiatic coast westward and north-westward was known as

Caria; and here Phoenician settlements appear to have been numerous. The

entire country was at any rate called Phoenicé by some authors.[550]

But the circumstances do not admit of our pointing out any special

Phoenician settlements in this quarter, which early fell under almost

exclusive Greek influence. There are ample grounds, however, for

believing that the Phoenicians colonised Rhodes at the south-western

angle of Asia Minor, off the Carian coast. According to Conon,[551] the

earliest inhabitants of Rhodes were the Heliades, whom the Phoenicians

expelled. The Phoenicians themselves were at a later date expelled by

the Carians, and the Carians by the Greeks. Ergeias, however, the native

historian, declared[552] that the Phoenicians remained, at any rate in

some parts of the island, until the Greeks drove them out. Ialysus was,

he said, one of their cities. Dictys Cretensis placed Phoenicians,

not only in Ialysus, but in Camirus also.[553] It is the conclusion of

Kenrick that “the Phoenician settlement in Rhodes was the first which

introduced civilisation among the primeval inhabitants, and that they

maintained their ascendancy till the rise of the naval power of the

Carians. These new settlers reduced the Phoenicians to the occupancy

of three principal towns”--i.e. Lindus, Ialysus, and Camirus; but “from

these too they were expelled by the Dorians, or only allowed to remain

at Ialysus as the hereditary priesthood of their native god.”[554]

Rhodes is an island about one-fourth the size of Cyprus, with its axis

from the north-east to the south-west. It possesses excellent harbours,

accessible from all quarters,[555] and furnishing a secure shelter in

all weathers. The fertility of the soil is great; and the remarkable

history of the island shows the importance which attaches to it in the

hands of an enterprising people. Turkish apathy has, however, succeeded

in reducing it to insignificance.

The acquisition of Rhodes led the stream of Phoenician colonisation

onwards in two directions, south-westward and north-westward.

South-westward, it passed by way of Carpathus and Casus to Crete,

and then to Cythera; north-westward, by way of Chalcia, Telos, and

Astypalæa, to the Cyclades and Sporades. The presence of the Phoenicians

in Crete is indicated by the haven “Phoenix,” where St. Paul’s

conductors hoped to have wintered their ship;[556] by the town of

Itanus, which was named after a Phoenician founder,[557] and was a

staple of the purple-trade,[558] and by the existence near port Phoenix

of a town called “Araden.” Leben, on the south coast, near Cape

Leo, seems also to have derived its name from the Semitic word for

“lion.”[559] Crete, however, does not appear to have been occupied by

the Phoenicians at more than a few points, or for colonising so much

as for trading purposes. They used its southern ports for refitting and

repairing their ships, but did not penetrate into the interior, must

less attempt to take possession of the whole extensive territory. It was

otherwise with the smaller islands. Cythera is said to have derived its

name from the Phoenician who colonised it, and the same is also reported

of Melos.[560] Ios was, we are told, originally called Phoenicé;[561]

Anaphé had borne the name of Membliarus, after one of the companions

of Cadmus;[562] Oliarus, or Antiparos, was colonised from Sidon.[563]

Thera’s earliest inhabitants were of the Phoenician race;[564] either

Phoenicians or Carians had, according to Thucydides,[565] colonised in

remote times “the greater part of the islands of the Ænean.” There was a

time when probably all the Ægean islands were Phoenician possessions,

or at any rate acknowledged Phoenician influence, and Siphnus gave its

gold, its silver,[566] and its lead,[567] Cythera its shell-fish,[568]

Paros its marble, Melos its sulphur and its alum,[569] Nisyrus its

millstones,[570] and the islands generally their honey,[571] to increase

the wealth and advance the commercial interests of their Phoenician

masters.

From the Sporades and Cyclades the advance was easy to the islands

of the Northern Ægean, Lemnos, Imbrus, Thasos, and Samothrace. The

settlement of the Phoenicians in Thasos is attested by Herodotus, who

says that the Tyrian Hercules (Melkarth) was worshipped there,[572] and

ascribes to the Phoenicians extensive mining operations on the eastern

shores of the island between Ænyra and Coenyra.[573] A Phoenician

occupation of Lemnos, Imbrus, and Samothrace is indicated by the worship

in those islands of the Cabeiri,[574] who were undoubtedly Phoenician

deities. Whether the Phoenicians passed from these islands to the

Thracian mainland, and worked the gold-mines of Mount Pangæus in the

vicinity of Philippi, may perhaps be doubtful, but such seems to have

been the belief of Strabo and Pliny.[575] Strabo also believed that

there had been a Semitic element in the population of Euboea which had

been introduced by Cadmus;[576] and a Phoenician settlement in Boeotia

was the current tradition of the Greek writers upon primitive times,

whether historians or geographers.[577]

The further progress of the Phoenician settlements northward into the

Propontis and the Euxine is a point whereon different opinions may

be entertained. Pronectus, on the Bithynian, and Amastris, on the

Paphlagonian coast, have been numbered among the colonies of the

Phoenicians by some;[578] while others have gone so far as to ascribe to

them the colonisation of the entire countries of Bithynia, Mariandynia,

and Paphlagonia.[579] The story of the Argonauts may fairly be held to

show[580] that Phoenician enterprise early penetrated into the stormy

and inhospitable sea which washes Asia Minor upon the north, and even

reached its deepest eastern recess; but it is one thing to sail into

seas, and, landing where the natives seem friendly, to traffic with

the dwellers on them--it is quite another thing to attempt a permanent

occupation of portions of their coasts. To do so often provokes

hostility, and puts a stop to trade instead of encouraging it. The

Phoenicians may have been content to draw their native products from the

barbarous tribes of Northern Asia Minor and Western Thrace--nay, even

of Southern Scythia--without risking the collisions that might have

followed the establishment of settlements.

As with the Black Sea, so with the Adriatic, the commercial advantages

were not sufficient to tempt the Phoenicians to colonise. From Crete

and Cythera they sent their gaze afar, and fixed it midway in the

Mediterranean, at the western extremity of the eastern basin, on the

shores of Sicily, and the vast projection from the coast of North Africa

which goes forth to meet them. They knew the harbourless character

of the African coast west of Egypt, and the dangers of the Lesser and

Greater Syrtes. They knew the fertility of the Tunisian projection, the

excellence of its harbours, and the prolificness of the large island

that lay directly opposite. Here were the tracts where they might expand

freely, and which would richly repay their occupation of them. It

was before the beginning of the eleventh century B.C.--perhaps

some centuries before--that the colonisation of North Africa by the

Phoenicians was taken in hand:[581] and about the same time, in all

probability, the capes and isles about Sicily were occupied,[582] and

Phoenician influence in a little time extended over the entire island.

In North Africa the first colony planted is said to have been Utica.

Utica was situated a little to the west of Carthage, at the mouth of the

Mejerda or Bagradas river.[583] It stood on a rocky promontory which ran

out into the sea eastward, and partially protected its harbour. At the

opposite extremity, towards the north, ran out another promontory, the

modern Ras Sidi Ali-el-Mekki, while the mouth of the harbour, which

faced to the south-east, was protected by some islands. At present the

deposits of the Mejerda have blocked up almost the whole of this ancient

port, and the rocky eminence upon which the city stood looks down on

three sides upon a broad alluvial plain, through which the Mejerda

pursues a tortuous course to the sea.[584] The remains of the ancient

town, which occupy the promontory and a peninsula projecting from it,

include a necropolis, an amphitheatre, a theatre, a castle, the ruins

of a temple, and some remains of baths; but they have nothing about

them bearing any of the characteristics of Phoenician architecture, and

belong wholly to the Roman or post-Roman period. The neighbourhood is

productive of olives, which yield an excellent oil; and in the hills

towards the south-west are veins of lead, containing a percentage of

silver, which are thought to bear traces of having been worked at a very

early date.[585]

Near Utica was founded, probably not many years later, the settlement

of Hippo-Zaritis, of which the name still seems to linger in the modern

Bizerta. Hippo-Zaritis stood on the west bank of a natural channel,

which united with the sea a considerable lagoon or salt lake, lying

south of the town. The channel was kept open by an irregular flux and

reflux, the water of the lake after the rainy season flowing off into

the sea, and that of the sea, correspondingly, in the dry season passing

into the lake.[586] At the present time the lake is extraordinarily

productive of fish,[587] and the sea outside yields coral;[588] but

otherwise the advantages of the situation are not great.

Two degrees further to the west, on a hill overlooking the sea, and

commanding a lovely prospect over the verdant plain at its base, watered

by numerous streams, was founded the colony of Hippo Regius, memorable

as having been for five-and-thirty years the residence of St. Augustine.

The Phoenicians were probably attracted to the site by the fertility of

the soil, the unfailing supplies of water, and the abundant timber and

rich iron ore of the neighbouring mountains.[589] Hippo Regius is now

Bona, or rather has been replaced by that town, which lies about a mile

and a half north of the ancient Hippo, close upon the coast, in the

fertile tract formed by the soil brought down by the river Seybouse. The

old harbour of Hippo is filled up, and the remains of the ancient city

are scanty; but the lovely gardens and orchards, which render Bona

one of the most agreeable of Algerian towns, sufficiently explain and

justify the Phoenician choice of the site.[590]

In the same bay with Utica, further to the south, and near its inner

recess, was founded, nearly three centuries after Utica, the most

important of all the Phoenician colonies, Carthage. The advantages of

the locality are indicated by the fact that the chief town of Northern

Africa, Tunis, has grown up within a short distance of the site.

It combined the excellences of a sheltered situation, a good soil,

defensible eminences, and harbours which a little art made all that was

to be desired in ancient times and with ancient navies. These basins,

partly natural, partly artificial, still exist;[591] but their

communication with the sea is blocked up, as also is the channel which

connected the military harbour with the harbours of commerce. The

remains of the ancient town are mostly beneath the surface of the soil,

but modern research has uncovered a portion of them, and brought to

light a certain number of ruins which belong probably to the very

earliest period. Among these are walls in the style called “Cyclopian,”

built of a very hard material, and more than thirty-two feet thick,

which seem to have surrounded the ancient Byrsa or citadel, and which

are still in places sixteen feet high.[592] The Roman walls found

emplaced above these are of far inferior strength and solidity. An

extensive necropolis lies north of the ancient town, on the coast near

Cape Camart.

Another early and important Phoenician settlement in these parts was

Hadrumetum or Adrymes,[593] which seems to be represented by the

modern Soûsa. Hadrumetum lay on the eastern side of the great Tunisian

projection, near the southern extremity of a large bay which looks to

the east, and is now known as the Gulf of Hammamet. Its position was

upon the coast at the edge of the vast plain called at present the

“Sahel of Soûsa,” which is sandy, but immensely productive of olive oil.

“Millions of olive-trees,” it is said, “cover the tract,”[594] and the

present annual exportation amounts to 40,000 hectolitres.[595] Ancient

remains are few, but the Cothon, or circular harbour, may still be

traced, and in the necropolis, which almost wholly encircles the town,

many sepulchral chambers have been found, excavated in the chalk,

closely resembling in their arrangements those of the Phoenician

mainland.

South of Hadrumetum, at no great distance, was Leptis Minor, now

Lemta. The gulf of Hammamet terminates southwards in the promontory of

Monastir, between which and Ras Dimas is a shallow bay looking to the

north-east. Here was the Lesser Leptis, so called to distinguish it

from the larger city of the same name between the Lesser and the Greater

Syrtis; it was, however, a considerable town, as appears from its

remains. These lie along the coast for two miles and a half in Lat. 35º

43´, and include the ruins of an aqueduct, of a theatre, of quays, and

of jetties.[596] The neighbourhood is suited for the cultivation of the

olive.

The Greater Leptis (Leptis Major) lay at a considerable distance from

the Lesser one. Midway in the low African coast which intervenes between

the Tunisian projection and the Cyrenaic one, about Long. 14º 22´ E.

of Greenwich, are ruins, near a village called Lebda, which, it is

generally agreed, mark the site of this ancient city. Leptis Major was

a colony from Sidon, and occupied originally a small promontory, which

projects from the coast in a north-easterly direction, and attains a

moderate elevation above the plain at its base. Towards the mainland

it was defended by a triple line of wall still to be traced, and on

the sea-side by blocks of enormous strength, which are said to resemble

those on the western side of the island of Aradus.[597] In Roman times

the town, under the name of Neapolis,[598] attained a vast size, and

was adorned with magnificent edifices, of which there are still numerous

remains. The neighbourhood is rich in palm-groves and olive-groves,[599]

and the Cinyps region, regarded by Herodotus as the most fertile in

North Africa,[5100] lies at no great distance to the east.

Ten miles east, and a little south of Leptis Minor,[5101] was Thapsus,

a small town, but one of great strength, famous as the scene of Julius

Cæsar’s great victory over Cato.[5102] It occupied a position close to

the promontory now known as Ras Dimas, in Lat. 35º 39´, Long. 11º 3´,

and was defended by a triple enclosure, whereof considerable remains

are still existing. The outermost of the three lines appears to have

consisted of little more than a ditch and a palisaded rampart, such as

the Romans were accustomed to throw up whenever they pitched a camp in

their wars; but the second and third were more substantial. The second,

which was about forty yards behind the first, was guarded by a deeper

ditch, from which rose a perpendicular stone wall, battlemented at top.

The third, forty yards further back, resembled the second, but was on

an enlarged scale, and the wall was twenty feet thick.[5103] Such triple

enclosures are thought to be traceable in other Phoenician settlements

also;[5104] but in no case are the remains so perfect as at Thapsus. The

harbour, which lay south of the town, was protected from the prevalent

northern and north-eastern winds by a huge mole or jetty, carried

out originally to a distance of 450 yards from the shore, and still

measuring 325 yards. The foundation consists of piles driven into the

sand, and placed very close together; but the superstructure is a stone

wall thirty-five feet thick, and still rising to a height of ten feet

above the surface of the water.[5105]

It is probable that there were many other early Phoenician settlements

on the North African seaboard; but those already described were

certainly the most important. The fertile coast tract between Hippo

Regius and the straits is likely to have been occupied at various

points from an early period. But none of these small trading settlements

attained to any celebrity; and thus it is unnecessary to go into

particulars respecting them.

In Sicily the permanent Phoenician settlements were chiefly towards the

west and the north-west. They included Motya, Eryx, Panormus (Palermo),

and Soloeis. That the Phoenicians founded Motya, Panormus, and Soloeis

is distinctly stated by Thucydides;[5106] while Eryx is proved to have

been Phoenician by its remains. Motya, situated on a littoral island

less than half a mile from the western shore, in Lat. 38º nearly,

has the remains of a wall built of large stones, uncemented, in the

Phoenician manner,[5107] and carried, like the western wall of Aradus,

so close to the coast as to be washed by the waves. It is said by

Diodorus to have been at one time a most flourishing town.[5108] The

coins have Phoenician legends.[5109]

Eryx lay about seven miles to the north-east of Motya, in a very strong

position. Mount Eryx (now Mount Giuliano), on which it was mainly built,

rises to the height of two thousand feet above the plain,[5110] and,

being encircled by a strong wall, was rendered almost impregnable. The

summit was levelled and turned into a platform, on which was raised the

temple of Astarte or Venus.[5111] An excellent harbour, formed by Cape

Drepanum (now Trapani), lay at its base. There were springs of water

within the walls which yielded an unfailing supply. The walls were of

great strength, and a considerable portion of them is still standing,

and attests the skill of the Phoenician architects. The blocks in the

lower courses are mostly of a large size, some of them six feet long,

or more, and bear in many cases the well-known Phoenician

mason-marks.[5112] They are laid without cement, like those of Aradus

and Sidon, and recall the style of the Aradian builders, but are at once

less massive and arranged with more skill. The breadth of the wall is

about seven feet. At intervals it is flanked by square towers projecting

from it, which are of even greater strength than the curtain between

them, and which were carried up to a greater height. The doorways in

the wall are numerous, and are of a very archaic character, being either

covered in by a single long stone lintel or else terminating in a false

arch.[5113] The commercial advantages of Eryx were twofold, consisting

in the produce of the sea as well as in that of the shore. The shore

is well suited for the cultivation of the vine,[5114] while the

neighbouring sea yields tunny-fish, sponges, and coral.[5115]

Panormus (now Palermo) occupies a site almost unequalled by any other

Mediterranean city, a site which has conferred upon it the title of

“the happy,” and has rendered it for above a thousand years the most

important place in the island. “There is no town in Europe which enjoys

a more delicious climate, none so charming to look on from a distance,

none more delightfully situated in a nest of verdure and flowers. Its

superb mountains, with their bare flanks pierced along their base with

grottoes, enclose a marvellous garden, the famous ‘Shell of Gold,’ in

the midst of which are seen the numerous towers and domes, the fan-like

foliage of the palms, the spreading branches of the pines, and Mount

Reale on the south towering over all with its vast mass of convents and

churches.”[5116] The harbour lies open to the north; but the Phoenician

settlers, here as elsewhere, no doubt made artificial ports by means

of piers and moles, which have, however, disappeared on this

much-frequented site, where generation after generation has been

continually at work building and destroying. Panormus has left us no

antique remains beyond its coins, which are abundant, and show that the

native name of the settlement was Mahanath.[5117] Mahanath was situated

about forty miles east of Eryx, on the northern coast of the island.

Solus, or Soloeis, the Soluntum of the Romans (now Solanto), lay on the

eastern side of the promontory (Cape Zafferana) which shuts in the bay

of Palermo on the right. It stood on a slope at the foot of a lofty

hill, overlooking a small round port, and was fortified by a wall of

large squared blocks of stone,[5118] which may be still distinctly

traced. The site has yielded sarcophagi of an unmistakably Phoenician

character,[5119] and other objects of a high antiquity which recall the

Phoenician manner;[5120] but the chief remains belong to the Greco-Roman

times.

The islands in the strait which separates the North African coast from

Sicily were also colonised by the Phoenicians. These were three in

number, Cossura (now Pantellaria), Gaulos (now Gozzo), and Melita (now

Malta). Cossura, the most western of the three, lay about midway in the

channel, but nearer to the African coast, from which it is distant not

more than about thirty-five miles. It is a mass of igneous rock, which

was once a volcano, and which still abounds in hot springs and in

jets of steam.[5121] There was no natural harbour of any size, but the

importance of the position was such that the Phoenicians felt bound to

occupy the island, if only to prevent its occupation by others. The soil

was sterile; but the coins, which are very numerous,[5122] give reason

to suppose that the rocks were in early times rich in copper.

Gaulos (now Gozzo) forms, together with Malta and some islets, an

insular group lying between the eastern part of Sicily and the Lesser

Syrtis. It is situated in Lat. 36º 2´, Long. 12º 10´ nearly, and is

distant from Sicily only about fifty miles. The colonisation of the

island by the Phoenicians, asserted by Diodorus,[5123] is entirely

borne out by the remains, which include a Phoenician inscription of

some length,[5124] coins with Phoenician legends,[5125] and buildings,

believed to be temples, which have Phoenician characteristics.[5126]

Some of the blocks of stone employed in their construction have a length

of nearly twenty feet,[5127] with a width and height proportionate; and

all are put together without cement or mortar of any kind. A conical

stone of the kind known to have been used by the Phoenicians in their

worship was found in one of the temples.[5128] Gaulos had a port which

was reckoned sufficiently commodious, and which lay probably towards the

south-east end of the island.

Melita, or Malta, which lies at a short distance from Gozzo, to the

south-east, is an island of more than double the size, and of far

greater importance. It possesses in La Valetta one of the best harbours,

or rather two of the best harbours, in the world. All the navies of

Europe could anchor comfortably in the “great port” to the east of the

town. The western port is smaller, but is equally well sheltered. Malta

has no natural product of much importance, unless it be the honey, after

which some think that it was named.[5129] The island is almost treeless,

and the light powdery soil gives small promise of fertility. Still, the

actual produce, both in cereals and in green crops, is large; and the

oranges, especially those known as mandarines, are of superior quality.

Malta also produced, in ancient as in modern times, the remarkable breed

of small dogs[5130] which is still held in such high esteem. But the

Phoenician colonisation must have taken place rather on account of the

situation and the harbour than on account of the products.

From Sicily and North Africa the tide of emigration naturally and easily

flowed on into Sardinia, which is distant, from the former about 150

and from the latter about 115 miles. The points chosen by the Phoenician

settlers lay in the more open and level region of the south and the

south-west, and were all enclosed within a line which might be drawn

from the coast a little east of Cagliari to the northern extremity of

the Gulf of Oristano.[5131] The tract includes some mountain groups,

but consists mainly of the long and now marshy plain, called the

“Campidano,” which reaches across the island from Cagliari on the

southern to Oristano on the western coast. This plain, if drained, would

be by far the most fertile part of the island; and was in ancient times

exceedingly productive in cereals, as we learn from Diodorus.[5132]

The mountains west of it, especially those about Iglesias, contain

rich veins of copper and of lead, together with a certain quantity of

silver.[5133] Good harbours exist at Cagliari, at Oristano, and between

the island of S. Antioco and the western shore. It was at these points

especially that the Phoenicians made their settlements, the most

important of which were Caralis (Cagliari), Nora, Sulcis, and Tharros.

Caralis, or Cagliari, the present capital, lies at the bottom of a deep

bay looking southwards, and has an excellent harbour, sheltered in

all weathers. There are no remains of Phoenician buildings; but the

neighbourhood yields abundant specimens of Phoenician art in the shape

of tombs, statuettes, vases, bottles, and the like.[5134] Caralis

was probably the first of the settlements made by the Phoenicians in

Sardinia; it would attract them by its harbour, its mines, and the

fertility of its neighbourhood. From Caralis they probably passed to

Nora, which lay on the same bay to the south-west; and from Nora they

rounded the south-western promontory of Sardinia, and established

themselves on the small island now known as the Isola di San Antioco,

where they built a town which they called Sulchis or Sulcis.[5135]

Sulcis has yielded votive tablets of the Phoenician type, tombs, vases,

&c.[5136] The island was productive of lead, and had an excellent

harbour towards the north, and another more open one towards the south.

Finally, mid-way on the west coast, at the northern extremity of the

Gulf of Oristano, the Phoenicians occupied a small promontory which

projects into the sea southwards and there formed a settlement which

became known as Tharras or Tharros.[5137] Very extensive remains, quite

unmistakably Phoenician, including tombs, cippi, statuettes in metal and

clay, weapons, and the like, have been found on the site.[5138]

The passage would have been easy from Sardinia to Corsica, which is

not more than seven miles distant from it; but Corsica seems to have

possessed no attraction for the Phoenicians proper, who were perhaps

deterred from colonising it by its unhealthiness, or by the savagery of

its inhabitants. Or they may have feared to provoke the jealousy of the

Tyrrhenians, off whose coast the island lay, and who, without having

any colonising spirit themselves, disliked the too near approach of

rivals.[5139] At any rate, whatever the cause, it seems to have

been left to the Carthaginians, to bring Corsica within the range of

Phoenician influence; and even the Carthaginians did little more than

hold a few points on its shores as stations for their ships.[5140]

If from Sardinia the Phoenicians ventured on an exploring voyage

westward into the open Mediterranean, a day’s sail would bring them

within sight of the eastern Balearic Islands, Minorca and Majorca.

The sierra of Majorca rises to the height of between 3,000 and 4,000

feet,[5141] and can be seen from a great distance. The occupation of the

islands by “the Phoenicians” is asserted by Strabo,[5142] but we cannot

be sure that he does not mean Phoenicians of Africa, i.e. Carthaginians.

Still, on the whole, modern criticism inclines to the belief that, even

before the foundation of Carthage, Phoenician colonisation had made its

way into the Balearic Islands, directly, from the Syrian coast.[5143]

Some resting-places between the middle Mediterranean and Southern Spain

must have been a necessity; and as the North African coast west of Hippo

offered no good harbours, it was necessary to seek them elsewhere.

Now Minorca has in Port Mahon a harbour of almost unsurpassed

excellence,[5144] while in Majorca there are fairly good ports both at

Palma and at Aleudia.[5145] Ivica is less well provided, but there is

one of some size, known as Pormany (i.e. “Porta magna”), on the western

side of the island, and another, much frequented by fishing-boats,[5146]

on the south coast near Ibiza. The productions of the Balearides were

not, perhaps, in the early times of much importance, since the islands

are not, like Sardinia, rich in metals, nor were the inhabitants

sufficiently civilised to furnish food supplies or native manufactures

in any quantity. If, then, the Phoenicians held them, it must have been

altogether for the sake of their harbours.

The colonies of the Mediterranean have now been, all of them, noticed,

excepting those which lay upon the south coast of Spain. Of these the

most important were Malaca (now Malaga), Sex or Sexti, and Abdera

(now Adra). Malaca is said by Strabo to have been “Phoenician in

its plan,”[5147] Abdera is expressly declared by him to have been “a

Phoenician settlement,”[5148] while Sexti has coins which connect it

with early Phoenician legends.[5149] The mountain range above Malaca

was anciently rich in gold-mines;[5150] Sexti was famous for its

salt-pans;[5151] Abdera lay in the neighbourhood of productive

silver-mines.[5152] These were afterwards worked from Carthagena,

which was a late Carthaginian colony, founded by Asdrubal, the uncle

of Hannibal. Malaga and Carthagena (i.e. New-Town) had well-sheltered

harbours; but the ports of Sexti and Abdera were indifferent.

Outside the Straits of Gibraltar, on the shores of the Atlantic, were

two further sets of Phoenician colonies, situated respectively in Africa

and in Spain. The most important of those in Africa were Tingis (now

Tangiers) and Lixus (now Chemmish), but besides these there were a vast

number of staples ({emporia}) without names,[5153] spread along the

coast as far as Cape Non, opposite the Canary Islands. Tingis, a second

Gibraltar, lay nearly opposite that wonderful rock, but a little west

of the narrowest part of the strait. It had a temple of the Tyrian

Hercules, said to have been older than that at Gades;[5154] and

its coins have Phoenician legends.[5155] The town was situated on

a promontory running out to the north-east at the extremity of a

semicircular bay about four miles in width, and thus possessed a harbour

not to be despised, especially on such a coast. The country around

was at once beautiful and fertile, dotted over with palms, and well

calculated for the growth of fruit and vegetables. The Atlas mountains

rose in the background, with their picturesque summits, while in front

were seen the blue Mediterranean, with its crisp waves merging into the

wilder Atlantic, and further off the shores of Spain, lying like a blue

film on the northern horizon.[5156]

While Tingis lay at the junction of the two seas, on the northern

African coast, about five miles east of Cape Spartel, Lixus was situated

on the open Atlantic, forty miles to the south of that cape, on the

West African coast, looking westward towards the ocean. The streams

from Atlas here collect into a considerable river, known now as the

Wady-el-Khous, and anciently as the Lixus.[5157] The estuary of this

river, before reaching the sea, meanders through the plain of

Sidi Oueddar, from time to time returning upon itself, and forming

peninsulas, which are literally almost islands.[5158] From this plain,

between two of the great bends made by the stream, rose in one place

a rocky hill; and here the Phoenicians built their town, protecting it

along the brow of the hill with a strong wall, portions of which still

remain in place.[5159] The blocks are squared, carefully dressed, and

arranged in horizontal courses, without any cement. Some of them are

as much as eleven feet long by six feet or somewhat more in height. The

wall was flanked at the corners by square towers, and formed a sort of

irregular hexagon, above a mile in circumference.[5160] A large building

within the walls seems to have been a temple;[5161] and in it was found

one of those remarkable conical stones which are known to have been

employed in the Phoenician worship. The estuary of the river formed a

tolerably safe harbour for the Phoenician ships, and the valley down

which the river flows gave a ready access into the interior.

In Spain, outside the Pillars of Hercules, the chief Phoenician

settlements were Tartessus, Agadir or Gades, and Belon. Tartessus has

been regarded by some as properly the name of a country rather than a

town;[5162] but the statements of the Greek and Roman geographers to the

contrary are too positive to be disregarded. Tartessus was a town in

the opinions of Scymnus Chius, Strabo, Mela, Pliny, Festus Avienus,

and Pausanias,[5163] who could not be, all of them, mistaken on such a

point. It was a town named from, or at any rate bearing the same

name with, an important river of southern Spain,[5164] probably the

Guadalquivir. It was not Gades, for Scymnus Chius mentions both cities

as existing in his day;[5165] it was not Carteia, for it lay west of

Gades, while Carteia lay east. Probably it occupied, as Strabo thought,

a small island between two arms of the Guadalquivir, and gradually

decayed as Gades rose to importance. It certainly did not exist

in Strabo’s time, but five or six centuries earlier it was a most

flourishing place.[5166] If it is the Tarshish of Scripture, its

prosperity and importance must have been even anterior to the time of

Solomon, whose “navy of Tarshish” brought him once in every three years

“gold, and silver, and ivory, and apes, and peacocks.”[5167] The south

of Spain was rich in metallic treasures, and yielded gold, silver,

copper, iron, lead, and tin;[5168] trade along the west coast of Africa

would bring in the ivory and apes abundant in that region; while the

birds called in our translation of the Bible “peacocks” may have

been guinea-fowl. The country on either side of the Guadalquivir to

a considerable distance took its name from the city, being called

Tartessis.[5169] It was immensely productive. “The wide plains through

which the Guadalquiver flows produced the finest wheat, yielding an

increase of a hundredfold; the oil and the wine, the growth of the

hills, were equally distinguished for their excellence. The wood was not

less remarkable for its fineness than in modern times, and had a native

colour beautiful without dye.”[5170] Nor were the neighbouring sea and

stream less bountiful. The tunny was caught in large quantities off the

coast, shell-fish were abundant and of unusual size,[5171] while huge

eels were sometimes taken by the fishermen, which, when salted, formed

an article of commerce, and were reckoned a delicacy at Athenian

tables.[5172]

Gades is said to have been founded by colonists from Tyre a few years

anterior to the foundation of Utica by the same people.[5173] Utica, as

we have seen, dated from the twelfth century before Christ. The site of

Gades combined all the advantages that the Phoenicians desired for their

colonies. Near the mouth of the Guadalete there detaches itself from the

coast of Spain an island eleven miles in length, known now as the “Isla

de Leon,” which is separated from the mainland for half its length by a

narrow but navigable channel, while to this there succeeds on the

north an ample bay, divided into two portions, a northern and a

southern.[5174] The southern, or interior recess, is completely

sheltered from all winds; the northern lies open to the west, but is so

full of creeks, coves, and estuaries as to offer a succession of fairly

good ports, one or other of which would always be accessible. The

southern half of the island is from one to four miles broad; but the

northern consists of a long spit of land running out to the north-west,

in places not more than a furlong in width, but expanding at its

northern extremity to a breadth of nearly two miles. The long isthmus,

and the peninsula in which it ends, have been compared to the stalk and

blossom of a flower.[5175] The flower was the ancient Gades, the modern

Cadiz. The Phoenician occupation of the site is witnessed to by Strabo,

Diodorus, Scymnus Chius, Mela, Pliny, Velleius Paterculus, Ælian and

Arrian,[5176] and is further evidenced by the numerous coins which bear

the legend of “Agadir” in Phoenician characters.[5177] But the place

itself retains no traces of the Phoenician occupation. The famous temple

of Melkarth, with its two bronze pillars in front bearing inscriptions,

has wholly perished, as have all other vestiges of the ancient

buildings. This is the result of the continuous occupation of the site,

which has been built on successively by Phoenicians, Carthaginians,

Romans, Vandals, Moors, and Spaniards. The space is somewhat confined,

and the houses in ancient times were, we are told, closely crowded

together,[5178] as they were at Aradus and Tyre. But the advantages of

the harbour and the productiveness of the vicinity more than made up for

this inconvenience. Gades may have been, as Cadiz is now said to be, “a

mere silver plate set down upon the edge of the sea,”[5179] but it was

the natural centre of an enormous traffic. It had easy access by the

valley of a large stream to the interior with its rich mineral and

vegetable products; it had the command of two seas, the Atlantic and the

Mediterranean; it trained its sailors to affront greater perils than any

which the Mediterranean offers; and it enjoyed naturally by its position

an almost exclusive commerce with the Northern Atlantic, with the

western coasts of Spain and Gaul, with Britain, North Germany, and the

Baltic.

Compared with Gades and Tartessus, Belon was an insignificant

settlement. Its name[5180] and coins[5181] mark it as Phoenician, but

it was not possessed of any special advantages of situation. The modern

Bolonia, a little south of Cadiz, is thought to mark the site.[5182]

We have reached now the limits of Phoenician colonisation towards

the West. While their trade was carried, especially from Gades, into

Luisitania and Gallæcia on the one hand, and into North-western Africa

on the other, reaching onward past these districts to Gaul and Britain,

to the Senegal and Gambia, possibly to the Baltic and the Fortunate

Islands, the range of their settlements was more circumscribed. As,

towards the north-east, though their trade embraced the regions of

Colchis and Thrace, of the Tauric Chersonese, and Southern Scythia,

their settlements were limited to the Ægean and perhaps the Propontis,

so westward they seem to have contented themselves with occupying a few

points of vantage on the Spanish and West African coasts, at no great

distance from the Straits, and from these stations to have sent out

their commercial navies to sweep the seas and gather in the products of

the lands which lay at a greater distance. The actual extent of their

trade will be considered in a later chapter. We have been here concerned

only with their permanent settlements or colonies. These, it has been

seen, extended from the Syrian coast to Cyprus, Cilicia, Rhodes, Crete,

the islands and shores of the Ægean and Propontis, the coasts of Sicily,

Sardinia, and North Africa, the Balearic Islands, Southern Spain, and

North-western Africa as far south as Cape Non. The colonisation was

not so continuous as the Greek, nor was it so extensive in one

direction,[5183] but on the whole it was wider, and it was far bolder

and more adventurous. The Greeks, as a general rule, made their advances

by slow degrees, stealing on from point to point, and having always

friendly cities near at hand, like an army that rests on its supports.

The Phoenicians left long intervals of space between one settlement and

another, boldly planted them on barbarous shores, where they had nothing

to rely on but themselves, and carried them into regions where the

natives were in a state of almost savagery. The commercial motive was

predominant with them, and gave them the courage to plunge into wild

seas and venture themselves among even wilder men. With the Greeks the

motive was generally political, and a safe home was sought, where social

and civil life might have free scope for quiet development.

History of Phoenicia · 第 5 / 16 章