This most wonderful of revolutions seemed to break as a bolt

Produced by Charlie Howard and the Online Distributed

Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was

produced from images generously made available by The

Internet Archive/American Libraries.)

CHINA REVOLUTIONIZED

[Illustration:

Copyright, 1913. The Bobbs-Merrill Company.

The Honorable Yuan Shih Kai, confirmed as president of China by the

National Assembly, January, 1913. A middle province type (Honan).

He is wearing the uniform of the General-in-Chief of the northern

army. A forceful progressive leader of the New China.

]

CHINA

REVOLUTIONIZED

_By_

JOHN STUART THOMSON

AUTHOR OF

The Chinese, Bud and Bamboo, Etc.

ILLUSTRATED WITH PHOTOGRAPHS AND MAPS

INDIANAPOLIS

THE BOBBS-MERRILL COMPANY

PUBLISHERS

COPYRIGHT, APRIL, 1913

THE BOBBS-MERRILL COMPANY

PRESS OF

BRAUNWORTH & CO.

BOOKBINDERS AND PRINTERS

BROOKLYN, N. Y.

DEDICATED TO MOTHER

CONTENTS

CHAPTER PAGE

I THE GENESIS OF THE REPUBLICAN REVOLUTION 1

II WIT AND HUMOR IN CHINA 114

III INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL CHINA 137

IV FINANCE AND BUDGET IN CHINA 161

V BUSINESS METHODS OF FOREIGNERS IN CHINA 175

VI RAILWAYS IN CHINA 186

VII SHIPPING AND WATER ROUTES IN CHINA 196

VIII AMERICA IN CHINA 206

IX THE NATIVE LEADERS 222

X CHINA’S INTERNATIONAL POLITICS 229

XI CHINESE INTERNAL POLITICS 242

XII SOME PUBLIC WORKS IN OLD CHINA 250

XIII THE INFLUENCE OF JAPAN 259

XIV PRESSURE OF RUSSIA AND FRANCE ON CHINA 281

XV SOME FOREIGN TYPES IN CHINA, AND THEIR INFLUENCE 288

XVI THE MANCHU 305

XVII CHINA’S ARMY AND NAVY 317

XVIII MODERN EDUCATION IN CHINA 334

XIX LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE 351

XX LIFE OF FOREIGNERS IN CHINA 363

XXI FOREIGN CITIES OF CHINA 375

XXII NATIVE CITIES OF CHINA 433

XXIII RELIGIOUS AND MISSIONARY CHINA 450

XXIV LEGAL PRACTISE AND CRIME IN CHINA 472

XXV CHINESE DAILY LIFE 487

XXVI CLIMATE, DISEASE AND HYGIENE 499

XXVII CHINESE WOMANHOOD 519

XXVIII AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY IN CHINA 533

XXIX CHINESE ARCHITECTURE AND ART 541

XXX SOCIOLOGICAL CHINA 555

XXXI AWAKENED INTEREST IN AMERICA 567

INDEX 581

CHINA REVOLUTIONIZED

I

THE GENESIS OF THE REVOLUTION IN CHINA AND ITS HISTORY

FROM OCTOBER 10, 1911, TO YUAN SHIH KAI’S ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROVISIONAL

PRESIDENCY

A republic in place of the oldest monarchy! Preposterous. It would

involve making a yellow man think as a white man, and that had never

occurred, not even in the case of the prodigy, Japan. It would involve

free intercourse with the whole wide world, and China had opposed such

an innovation stubbornly for 400 years. It meant that the proudest

and most self-contained nation should treat others as equals and

interchange with them. It involved throwing 4,000 years of continuous

history and agglomerated pride and precedent to the winds, and humbly

beginning anew as a tyro for a while. It meant the dealing with

400,000,000 kings, instead of one, and asking: “My lord, what is your

will?” An educational system 2,000 years old to be forgotten at once!

A religion 5,000 years old at least, whereby every man had his own god

(his father), to be made as cheap as the paltry sacrifices of wine,

rice and the painted stick of Confucianism were in reality! The taking

up of individual and national responsibility for 400,000,000 people,

and entrance upon a wide path of world-influence, with its divided

shame and fame! The taking and giving of blows for wrong and right!

The giving up of the triple eternal Nirvana of father, self and son,

in exchange for an exciting rôle limited to fifty-five crowded years

in the individual! The scale of action! A land as large as all Europe,

and a people as numerous as the Caucasic race! The thunderous knock on

the long-locked doors of science and medicine by 400,000,000 people who

had bowed to idol and charm alone! It shook the world. It was pregnant

with paradisal possibilities for mankind, because of the vastness of

the movement and the depth of its well-spring. The launching of this

new leviathan ship of state could not but raise a wave that would

lift the already floating hulks of Europe and America, and give them

added impetus, though temporary alarm. The rearrangement of commerce,

manufacture, labor, finance, taxation, learning, agriculture, art and

possibly religion for the whole world. The adding of the most difficult

language to the tongues and pens of men, and the call on the English

speech to rise once more greater than the mighty stranger, or die.

The challenge to Palestine’s Bible to conquer by truth, or retreat

with half a world lost. The uprising again of the yellow ghosts of

Kublai Khan, Batu, Timurlane, and the Khans of the Golden Horde. What

would be the Caucasian’s answer to Emperor William’s question: “The

Yellow Peril”? It will be remembered that the kaiser once painted a

picture showing the nations of Europe gathering to defend the cross

and civilization against an incendiary Buddha lowering in the eastern

sky. Would the stranger within the gates be protected even while

republican and imperialist fought out their argument? Would leadership

arise, and would the great Mongolian mass be intellectualized now

that it was energized? Since the vast body was suddenly displaced,

would it henceforward move by mere gravity, or sympathetic volition?

Could it collectivize and not disintegrate? What would be the effect

on the scores of trembling thrones, where Rominoff, Hapsburg, Savoy,

Hohenzollern, Ottoman, Mikado, Billiken, etc., said they ruled by

“divine right”, which is quite a different thing from noble England’s

“constitutional right”? Sun Yat Sen and the Chinese republicans sent

out this challenge: “Tien ming wu chang” (the divine right lasts not

forever).

All these questions presented themselves when the reformers startled

the world with the announcement that there was to be a republic in

China. It was to be a republic--not a monarchy--said even those

Chinese who had been educated in Japan, where lately a Japanese editor

educated in America and ten others had been tried and executed in

secret, the papers sealed, and the press censored. They wanted pitiless

publicity in the new republican China. Had there been no abatement

of the opium habit through America’s leadership of sentiment, and

Britain’s sacrifice of revenue from 1909 to 1911, there could have

been no rebellion in 1911. The reform cleared the befogged heads of

the nation, added a million men to agitation, and furnished a hundred

million dollars directly and indirectly toward the independence of the

agitators. How great a stone America and Britain set rolling in that

Opium Conference of 1909 at Shanghai!

The great revolution of October, 1911, did not drop as a bolt from

a clear sky. The clouds had been gathering, though many at home

and abroad did not, or would not see them. In September, 1911, the

imperial viceroy of Canton, Chang Ming Chi, sent spies along the new

Canton-Hongkong railway to apprehend smugglers of arms. In the same

month troops under the command of Marshal Lung Chai Kwong, suddenly

surrounded the office of the _Shat Pat Po_ newspaper, at Canton, and

arrested several reformers. General Luk Wing Ting, of Kwangsi province,

came down the Si Kiang (West River) in September, 1911, in the gunboat

_Po Pik_ to Canton and took back with him from the Canton arsenal,

machine guns and ammunition to attack the “anarchists”, as the Manchus

persistently called all reformers. In the month previous, the Ministry

of Posts and Communications at Peking stopped the use of private codes,

so as to censor messages to the reformers. Several viceroys, in secret

sympathy with the reformers, had as early as August, 1911, wired for

gunboats, so as to disperse the fleet from the Yangtze basin, where the

revolution was to strike, and the largest cruiser, the splendid _Hai

Chi_, well-known in New York, these viceroys suggested should be sent

to King George’s coronation review at Spithead. Even as far back as

July, 1907, the Chinese government approached the powers, requesting

that they make espionage on arms consigned to South China. Rather

to our amusement, they used to arrive at Hongkong as boxed pipes,

condensers, bar iron, crockery, etc.--anything but guns, but that was

the humor of the freight classification which the shippers used! In

December, 1906, the scholars of the middle class in Wuchow, Kwangsi

province, at the head of navigation on the West River, decided to cut

off their queues, and adopted khaki uniform, military drill and track

races. They were independently preparing for strenuous times five years

before the outbreak, and these boys were found in the first line of

the attack in October, 1911, up at Hankau, led by the Chinese Colonel

Wen, who had graduated from West Point Military Academy, in America, in

1909. In August, 1911, the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation

reported that a large part of its $9,000,000 gold note issue was being

held, instead of circulated by the Chinese of Kwangtung and other

southern provinces. This hoarding of safe securities always indicates

lack of faith as to the business and political future.

The celebrated Manchu, Tuan Fang, director-general of railways, was

ordered by the Ministry of Communications to proceed to Canton and

Kung Yik, the new town of the Americanized Chinese, in August, 1911,

to “pacify the people”. Tuan replied that he would not go, and gave

as his excuse: “Canton is infested with anarchism”. In the same month

the regent, Prince Chun, asked Prince Ching to recommend an energetic

general to be sent to quell disturbances in Kwangtung province, and

the Tartar general, Fung Shan, was sent. Spying was not uncommon,

impersonators going to a province ahead of new appointees and reciting

a record at the yamen which seemed to identify them. In August, 1911,

the cabinet at Peking decided to send photographs of new officials in a

sealed envelope, so as to prevent this impersonating.

As an indication of the new spirit which was moving among the Chinese

of Canton for better things at this time, take the inception of the

model town of Heungchow. Chinese returned from America, Singapore

and Hongkong could not bear the municipal restraint of the old city.

They chose a site ten miles up the inner harbor of Macao. Dredging

and a breakwater were begun for a harbor. Broad streets, drains, fine

stores, temples, police and fire stations and equipment, water-works,

libraries, parks, reforestation, chamber of commerce, tramways,

electricity and gas, hospitals, schools, theaters, detached homes with

gardens, launch and steamer lines, and a free port,--all were in the

scheme. When a government permits monopoly of food, and riots result

because of justice ineffectually exerted, history shows that the

government is about to fall. I instance the fierce Hangchow rice riots

of July, 1906, under the leadership of the Hung Pang (Red Association),

and the Changsha rice riots of 1910, when Yale College, in China, was

barely saved from the conflagration in the very district which in 1911

was swept by the high tide of the revolution. In 1906 text-books were

issued to the modern schools (Hok Tongs) which contained a caricature

of China, not as the “Middle Kingdom” of old, but as a morsel from

which all the nations took a bite. The intent, of course, was to arouse

resentful patriotism in place of the old inert pride. Many of these

schoolboys enlisted in the two bravest corps of the republicans, the

“Dare to Die” band, and the “Bomb Throwers” regiment. In April, 1911,

the rebels, under two of Sun Yat Sen’s lieutenants, Hu Wai Sang and Wu

Sum, operating in Kwangtung province, issued to the world almost the

identical manifesto that President Sun and Foreign Secretary Wu Ting

Fang issued in January, 1912, covering the following points:

1. Ousting the Manchu.

2. Friendly intercourse with foreigners and protection of foreign

property and person.

3. All foreign treaties now in force to be allowed to run their course.

4. Foreign loans and indemnities contracted by Manchus to date to be

paid.

5. Concessions contracted to date to be binding.

Desperate fighting took place, and had the rebels been sufficiently

supplied with money and arms, the republic would have been declared

at Canton in April instead of at Wuchang and Nanking in November. The

United States gunboat _Wilmington_ and British gunboats were rushed

to Shameen Island, Canton, to protect foreigners. Admiral Li, who was

killed in the October revolution, was barely able to conquer this

April revolution in Kwangtung and Fukien provinces. For centuries the

Chinese women would not associate with the Manchus, whom they called

“tent women”. All through Turkestan the Chinese walled off their

section of the city from the Mongolian settlements, though after the

conquest the Manchu troops displaced the Chinese.

Nearly all the missions were informed by students and friends

many months previous to the revolution that serious and continued

disturbances would occur. The Chinese saw that individualism had

arisen in America and England and was battling with the privileged.

Individualism arose at last in China and resented in this rebellion

the quietism taught by the superstition of Taoism, the resignation

of Buddhism and the obedience of Confucianism. “I am not a clan; I

am a man,” said the ambitious Chinese as he saw the new ray of hope.

American diplomacy was not altogether uninformed or unprepared. The

American fleet was made the largest foreign fleet in Chinese waters in

the first month of the revolution, Admiral Murdock having the cruisers

_Saratoga_ (the converted _New York_ of Spanish War fame), _Albany_,

_New Orleans_, _Wilmington_; the gunboats _Helena_, _El Cano_,

_Villalobos_, _Samar_; the monitor _Monterey_; and the destroyers

_Barry_ and _Decatur_.

As far back as June 3, 1910, a year and four months before the

revolution, the Shanghai _News_ printed the following article: “All

the legations and consuls have received anonymous letters from

friendly revolutionaries in Shanghai containing the warning that an

extensive anti-dynastic uprising is imminent. If they do not assist

the Manchus, foreigners are not to be harmed.” In August, 1911, a

rebellion broke out at Sining, in far western Kansu province. The

stores were raided for every bolt of foreign cotton to make uniforms.

A boy of fifteen was named leader and he was given the significantly

fanciful name of “Savior of his country” (Chiu Shih Wang). Rich men

cornered the rice supply in the flooded Yangtze valley, and food

riots broke out all along the river in August, 1911. On August 23,

1911, rebels boarded a Chinese gunboat on the romantic Si Kiang (West

River) near Canton, shooting the commander and seizing the arms and

ammunition. On September first the Navy Department strengthened the

patrol of Kwangtung province waters so as to stop the smuggling of

arms, and the army board required miners to get permits to import

dynamite, as they feared that the “anarchists” were importing the

explosive. The awful floods and famines of 1910–11 in the basins of

the Yangtze River, the Hwei River and Grand Canal had created much

criticism of the government, which failed to alleviate suffering;

and the famine-stricken were willing to fight, because an army has a

commissariat, at least. “Every one that was in distress, and every

one that was in debt, and every one that was discontented, escaped to

the cave of Adullam.” Newspapers, such as the oldest reform journal,

the _Shen Pao_, of Shanghai, related horrible illegal tortures of the

“third degree” used by Manchuized officials, which I have quoted in the

chapter on “Legal Practise.”

Tin was largely financing the propaganda, the 400,000 Chinese tin

merchants and miners of Singapore and Penang in the Straits Settlements

being the largest contributors. Following them came the 100,000

American Chinese and the 50,000 Australian Chinese. Even in 1898, Li

Hung Chang was known to declare, at Canton, that it was not impossible

that the spread of the proposed new education of the foreigners would

overturn the Manchu dynasty, of which he, a Chinese from Hofei, in

Nganhwei province, had been the strongest prop among the viceroys for

forty-five years. Superstition was not inactive. Halley’s comet flared

in the sky. It had shone when Cæsar fell; when Jerusalem fell; when

Italy fell before Attila; when English Harold fell before William the

Conqueror; when Rome fell in England; when Quebec fell before Wolfe;

and now its awful flame must surely prophesy the fall of the Manchu

dynasty. Omens were recited that red snow (snow and loess) had fallen

in Honan province, and that the Hangchow tidal bore had risen twenty

feet, broke over the bank and poured water into the first gallery of

the Haining pagoda. This always meant the fall of the dynasty, for

had it not happened on the night the beloved Mings fell, and when the

scholarly Sungs fell?

As with civil servants in some other countries, the Manchuized civil

service (mandarins) acted as though they were the governors and not

the servants of the people by allotting to themselves high salaries

and peculations. The year before the revolution the land tax yielded

about $150,000,000. Only $30,000,000 reached the government exchequer.

The Chinese held the Manchus responsible for this criminal neglect

of audit, for at least $100,000,000 should have reached the imperial

and provincial exchequers. That would have allowed $50,000,000 for

the expected peculation of that kind of office holders who believe

that “public office is a private graft”. In September, 1911, the

month preceding the great revolution, the _Chi Feng Po_, a native

paper of Peking, reported that all wages were in arrears and that

even the tea coolies had humorously pasted an anonymous sheet on the

imperial controller’s door: “Not even a shadow of our wages yet; WHY!

WHY!” Taxes were increased on long-suffering Kwangtung province in

the south, the brick kilns of Kochau, the silk sheds of Namhoi, the

tea houses, and even the temple keepers being assessed “all the taxed

would bear”. I shall instance a representative revolt. On September 6,

1911, the bonze at Shek Lung, near Canton, organized a revolt among the

worshipers at his temple. The mob demolished the municipal yamen, the

police station, the government distilleries, abattoir and fish market.

As far back as 1898 the emperor, Kwang Hsu, by edict declared that the

lottery at Canton should pay one-third of the upkeep of the far-away

Peking University. I have related in the chapter on “Chinese Daily

Life” the incident of a unique statue of a kneeling figure erected in

the Kwan clan temple at San Wui, near Canton, in August, 1911, which is

whipped by the worshipers to commemorate the defection of a member to

the government’s railway and tax program. There was always ill feeling

between Peking and Kwangtung provinces, the Manchu and Manchuized

viceroys joking at Peking when they were ordered to assume charge at

the yamen at Canton: “Well, I’m off to boss Miaotszes (barbarians),”

which the refined and commercial Cantonese certainly were not. This

superciliousness was deeply resented.

Repeated complaint had been made that an unrepresentative Manchu

government gave away concessions right and left to foreigners, and

that when these concessions were recalled or bought out, owing to

outraged patriotic feeling in the southern and central provinces,

the foreigner in instances charged immense sums for good will and

franchise in addition to his outlay and interest. I shall not recite

instances, as it is the system that I am denouncing, not the persons.

The Chinese rightly said, if we look at the matter with his eyes, that

he was not going to pay vast sums for the retrocession of his own

franchise, which was in some instances coerced from, or wheedled out

of, an effete, governing, unrepresentative clique, the members of which

never consulted the provinces that were concerned. “Taxation without

representation” again. It was not like the repudiation of the bonds

of the southern states, for no money had been paid. “Compensation”

and “indemnity” are two words the Chinese have learned to hate, and

some day they mean to build an immense navy and equip a large army to

interpret these words in the way the Occident interprets them, when

they are synonymous with injustice and “grab”. Bitter complaint has

continually been made since 1898 that Germany monopolized the mining

and railway franchises of the rich province of Shangtung.

On the subject of railways, concessions, etc., the following remarks

will be recalled in the American General J. H. Wilson’s book, _China_

(1887): “The Chinese will build railroads, open mines, etc., whenever

they can be shown that this can be done with their own money, obtained

at first by private subscription, and by their own labor, under the

direction of foreign experts who will treat them fairly and honestly.

They will not for the present grant concessions or subsidies to

foreigners. They will not even take money from any syndicate by

mortgage.” Complaint was also made that the Ming dynasty, 268 years

ago, left as a heritage to the Manchu dynasty, a land full of public

works, bridges, roads, temples, pagodas, canals, and that while the

Manchu collected large taxes, he seldom or never repaired a temple,

canal or road, so that China is now desolate. Objection was also made

that the government shipyards, like the Kiangnan, at Shanghai, were

building luxurious ocean steam yachts for Prince Tsui and others of the

imperial clan, an expense which the nation could not afford.

Two years before the famous revolution of October 10, 1911, the

author, in his book, _The Chinese_, picked out five men as the leaders

of changing China: Sun Yat Sen, as the anti-Manchu rebel, who would

take up arms in the endeavor to establish a republic; Kang Yu Wei,

who would go almost as far in reform, but would retain the Manchu

dynasty under a strict constitutional monarchy; Liang Chi Chao, as

the translator of reform books and a probable secretary of a reformed

state; Wu Ting Fang, as a secret reformer at heart, “who would bear

sympathetic watching”, and Yuan Shih Kai, to a degree an Occidentalized

opportunist of great ability, who was most favored by the Peking and

Tientsin foreigners, though distrusted by the Chinese and foreigners

in the south and Yangtze valley of China. The revolution was in full

sway by November, 1911, with Sun Yat Sen named as probable president

of a Chinese republic (Republic of Han); Kang in the exact place

prophesied; Liang as secretary of justice of Yuan’s first trial cabinet

of a constitutional monarchy; Wu Ting Fang as foreign minister of a

provisional republic at Shanghai; and Yuan called from his two years’

exile at Chang Te in Honan province to be the first minister of the

reformed constitutional monarchy.

This most wonderful of revolutions seemed to break as a bolt from a

clear sky on October 10, 1911, at Wuchang on the Yangtze River, in the

center of the land, under the very guns of the United States gunboats

_Helena_ and _Villalobos_ which were steaming by. It was, as I have

attempted to show, rather a carefully planned matter, the propaganda

going on abroad and at home under bands and leaders, all of whose views

did not stop at the same place, but whose opinions had one source

in patriotic reform. Kang, the oldest and first of the reformers,

commenced in 1897 by winning with his book, _Japan’s Reform_, the

emotional Manchu emperor, Kwang Hsu. But when the emperor fell in

1898 before the reactionary dowager, Tse Hsi, Kang, the Cantonese with

a Hongkong education, was driven to British Singapore and Penang,

from which places he has planned his travels and propaganda of the

“Pao Huang Hwei” (Empire Reform Association), which contemplated a

revolution of reform, but the retention of the Manchu dynasty as

constitutional monarchs for the time being. This association was quite

different from the Kao-lao-hwei, “Ko Ming” and “Sia Hwei” (reform

associations) of Sun Yat Sen, which aimed at a republic. In other words

Kang was a Taft “standpatter” medium reformer, and Sun a thorough-going

advanced reformer of the Roosevelt type. Kang’s associations grew up

in China, America and England, and Kang visited them, recommending the

drilling of companies to attack the troops of the reactionary literati

of the Hanlin academy.

Liang Chi Chao, the writer and translator, went first to the Straits

Settlements and then to Kobe and Yokohama, Japan, where he edited the

reform Chinese papers, the _Hsi Pao_ (Western paper), and the _Ming

Pao_, and flooded his country with translations of parts of the great

books of British and American liberty. Liang, too, tolerated the

retention of the Manchu monarchs for the time being. Doctor Macklin, an

American missionary of Nanking had translated Henry George’s _Progress

and Poverty_ into Chinese, and this book was in the hands of the

reformers, and particularly appreciated by Sun Yat Sen. Chang Yuan

Chi’s _Commercial Press_ of Honan Road, Shanghai, had, since 1898, been

translating a million dollars a year of Western text-books for Chinese

schools. The American Presbyterian Press at Suchow, and at 18 Peking

Road, Shanghai, the American Episcopal Press, the presses of the other

American and British missions and Bible societies, had for years been

issuing telling books of truth in Chinese. Rich compradores of foreign

houses at Hongkong, like Ma Ying Pui, presented $1,000 to patriotic

lecturing societies like the “Wan Yung.” Hæmon’s argument with his

father, King Creon, in Sophocles’ _Antigone_, brilliantly denouncing

absolute rule as only fitted for the monarch of a desert, was recited

by the foreign-trained students.

Yuan Shih Kai was deposed by the regent, Prince Chun, in 1909, but from

his exile at Chang Te in Honan province, he kept in dignified touch

with the formation of the new forces of opinion and arms, and with

his backers, the northern foreigners. Yuan is a mighty man, quite on

the style of Li Hung Chang, his preceptor, whom we of the West knew

so well. At Tientsin, the foreigners assisted Yuan, previous to 1909,

with instruction in Occidental organization, and the best troops of

the empire, as well as the best schools, and almost the best mills,

were organized by Yuan. The reformers who dare the most, however,

look upon Yuan by his past, as a temporizer, opportunist and dictator

largely under foreign influence; too much Occidentalized, and out

of touch with the spirit of “China for the Chinese”, and the “Sia

Hwei” (reform associations). They look upon him as, in the past, a

Manchuized Chinese who fears to work for himself as a republican, but

must have an employer like a Manchu emperor or some other head; great

as a Richelieu is great, but not as a Washington is great. They say

that while he is thorough of mind, he is not yet vehemently sincere

in heart. They fear that Yuan, if left to himself, would concede too

much to foreign concession seekers. They bitterly recall that but for

Yuan, the reformers of 1897–8 would have swept the kingdom peacefully.

Yuan is the most popular Chinese with foreigners at Peking, Tientsin,

Chifu, Newchwang, Tsingtau and other ports of the north. He is not so

much in touch with the heart of the reform spirit in Western, Central

or Southern China, nor with the foreigners of the great educational

treaty ports of those sections, and of the brilliant British colony of

Hongkong in South China, which, with British and American Shanghai,

has done most for a reformed China. Yuan’s only experience outside

of China proper was when as a youth he served twelve years with the

army in Korea. Yuan’s temperament is cold. A noted southern statesman,

referring to him, said: “What can you expect of a man who is so cold

that he has to carry three braziers up his sleeve?” In the Korean

campaign of 1884 against Japan, Yuan is said to have objected to Red

Cross operations, jesting that the surgeons didn’t need to take the

trouble, for “while they had remade the man, they hadn’t remade the

soldier”. Yuan was a ruthless decapitator in that and other campaigns.

However, “to err is human, and to forgive, divine”, and if Yuan serves

a united republican China with full heart in the future, the mistakes

of the past will be forgotten in the joys of the glorious deeds that

are possible.

Doctor Sun Yat Sen (let us Latinize him as Sunyacius) is a Hongkong

product, and has been a revolutionist and a republican from the

beginning. As a boy he was fed on thrilling stories of the Taiping

rebellion by his uncle, who had served as an officer in that rebellion.

He was born at Fatshan, seven miles west of Canton, in 1866. From

1884–87 he was assisted by Doctor Kerr, of the Anglo-American Mission,

Canton, in whose office he studied medicine and English. He studied

medicine and surgery under Doctor Cantlie at Hongkong, of which colony

he became a citizen (that is, a British citizen), though of course,

he has now returned to his Chinese citizenship. Doctor Cantlie was

then teaching in the Hongkong School of Medicine, which is now a part

of the Hongkong University. In 1892 Sun became the first Chinese

practising physician at Macao, and met with great opposition from the

Portuguese doctors, who, in 1894, drove him to Canton. His father was

a Chinese Christian evangelist, a Congregationalist (London Mission)

by denomination, and Sunyacius looks upon the study of the Christian

Bible as the greatest necessity in China’s education. Even two years

before Kang’s work at Peking, Doctor Sunyacius, in 1895, smuggled

arms into Canton, got his revolutionary forces at work, and received

his first baptism of fire, in which he showed, as on subsequent

occasions, absolute fearlessness regarding his life. Sunyacius also

lived for a while with his brother and sympathizers in Honolulu, and

his studies in Hawaii and in America committed him to the republican

form of government. Owing to the Swatow men not meeting the Hongkong

men at Canton, Sunyacius’ plans collapsed in 1895. By the advice of

Mr. Dennis, a prominent solicitor of Hongkong, Sunyacius fled to Kobe,

Japan; to Honolulu and to San Francisco. This incisive, good-looking

little man of about five feet five inches in height, who dresses and

looks like an American or a Briton, has for years been traveling

incognito in America, England and Japan, organizing drill, educational

and contributing corps of the “Kao Lao Hwei” (reform associations), the

money and men going to Canton, Shanghai and Wuchang, where the main

revolution broke out on that memorable day, October 10, 1911. General

Hwang Hing was Sunyacius’ representative in China in receiving this

aid. All of Sunyacius’ helpers proved loyal to their trust in handling

this money, except one, and of him Sunyacius himself writes: “He will

meet with his due reward.”

Sunyacius’ head carried a price (the modern blacklist) and only his

insistence on British citizenship saved him from being kidnapped as a

lunatic (no less) by the yellow and white detectives of the Manchus,

to have his ankles crushed under the hammer and his body cut into a

thousand pieces (lin chee) slowly at Peking. He was seized on Portland

Street in London, in 1896, and hurried to the Chinese Legation.

Sunyacius’ rescue came about in this dramatic way: His Hongkong

teacher, Doctor Cantlie, was then practising in London. Sunyacius gave

to a British secretary in the Chinese Legation a note addressed to

Doctor Cantlie, to whom it was fortunately delivered in the British

spirit of fair play and through the pleas of a woman, the Briton’s

wife counseling her husband to deliver the letter in “noble scorn

of consequence”. The heroic Doctor Cantlie at once took it to Lord

Salisbury and the British Foreign Office, which intervened, surrounding

the Chinese Legation with officers (a new siege of Peking). Sunyacius

was reluctantly given his freedom by the Manchuized Chinese. Only for

Britain, therefore, Sunyacius would never have lived to strike the

tocsin of a republican revolution. But then, Britain has been the

mother and teacher of reformers since Cromwell’s day.

Sunyacius’ headquarters have been at British Singapore and at Hongkong,

but he is as well known at San Francisco, Chicago, New York, London,

Vancouver and Yokohama. He has walked into dormitories of Columbia

College, New York, and talked revolution and reform with some of the

students under the unconscious eye of so prominent a conservative as

President Butler. One of his student protégés was Wellington Koo, now

the Chinese secretary to Yuan Shih Kai. Sunyacius is a thorough-going

scholar, propagandist, organizer and republican, like the book he

carried, a man of “Progress and Poverty”. The world’s great bankers,

especially two London firms long connected with Chinese progress,

knew him, his disguises as a salesman, etc., and his careful plans

of government and finance, and he has not been timid in America, or

in London, Hongkong and the Straits Settlements in asking for loans

for his propaganda and revolution. He has handled a million dollars

honestly, and lived most frugally. The greatest luxury he ever allowed

himself was a “Prince Albert” coat and a rose-bouttonière, but that was

so that he might appear acceptably before an audience of Occidentals!

When in Singapore, Doctor Sun had his picture taken in white ducks

and a topey hat, so that he is a modern in tonsorial as well as other

matters! “This conference must be secret and our correspondence must

be anonymous, and upon receipt, burned,” said Sun to the bankers.

“Why?” they asked. “Because I am shadowed night and day. Look across

the way when I suddenly lift the curtain.” He raised the curtain, and

the bankers saw two “sleuths” in the cowardly shadow, one of them a

Chinese, lurking in a recess of a money capital of the Occident, many

thousand miles from the Manchu cabal in Peking, who had Oriental and

Occidental detective agencies in their blacklisting pay.

Dr. Sun is a brilliant and enthusiastic speaker in Chinese and in

English. His speeches to the Chinese often extend into hours. His

small copper-plate handwriting in English is better than his Chinese

chirography. He is a polished writer, having published in 1904 in

London a book on “The Chinese Question”. The Manchus have kept Doctor

Sun out of China, and he is therefore not yet thoroughly known to the

Hupeh and Hunan province guilds, who fired the first successful shot,

but he is the pick of the southern and the alien Chinese, who are the

best educated of their race, and have largely financed reform: the

Chinese of Canton, Singapore, Penang, noble Hongkong, Macao, America,

England, Japan, Australia, and brilliant Shanghai. He has never held

office under the Manchus at home or abroad, and is therefore not well

known to foreigners in the salons of diplomats, in the capitals of the

Caucasic race, or to the masses of the Chinese in the north and west

provinces, but he is a coming man, and perhaps the most consistent

and steady of the reformers, as he is certainly the most promising,

intellectual and coolly daring. Sun Yat Sen’s name may some day be

Latinized into Sunyacius, just as Kung Fut Tse’s name became popular

as Confucius. Why not also Latinize Yuan Shih Kai’s name into the more

popular Yuanshius? The following incident will throw a light on Sun’s

character: On February 22nd his elder brother, Sun Mei, a man ordinary

in equipment, was almost elected governor of the great province of

Kwangtung as a popular tribute to Sun Yat Sen. The latter wired from

Nanking, disapproving of the choice for the province’s good, and urging

“brother Mei” to confine himself to business, for which he was more

fitted. Such frankness in family relations when public preferment is at

stake, is scarcely common.

Wu Ting Fang, a Cantonese trained at Hongkong, London and Washington,

blossomed out suddenly at Shanghai in November, 1911, as foreign

minister of the provisional Chinese republican government of the

fourteen central, eastern and southern rebel provinces. The western

world stopped its breath in tremendous astonishment. Wu! the brilliant,

fashionable and evasive Chinese minister at Washington, who would

put you off on politics to discuss vegetarianism, a rebel! He was

secretive beyond parallel, and had never talked revolution. The writer

tried to get him to talk reform in 1909 in connection with the reform

prophecies in his book, _The Chinese_, and though Wu had then fully

decided on the part he would take in the coming revolution, he would

only repeat what the writer said, and would express absolutely no

opinion of his own. I have known writers who have flayed him for this

abrupt evasion, calling him a “rice Christian” of yore, a temporizer,

etc., but I admire him for his calmness, fixed resolves, and patience

in waiting for the prodigious hour to strike. Wu knew what was coming,

and was heartily, though secretly, in favor of it. He was the first of

the rebels to insist on foreign acknowledgment of the rebel government,

and he formulated the most brilliant move of the revolution--the

announcement that if foreigners advanced money to the imperialists, and

the republicans won, the latter would repudiate such loans. This really

won the revolution, for numbers of the foreign syndicates, especially

the Russian, were at first heartily in favor of the Manchu _status

quo_. Wu has already codified the reform and penal laws of China, and

is prepared to enter upon that difficult question, extraterritoriality.

Watch Wu; he is not afraid to take the side of “China for the Chinese”,

although he is the most polished in western culture of all Chinese

officials. He aims to interpret the East to the West. Wu risked vast

preferment, and therefore he is a more sincere man than doughty Yuan,

and he will grow in power with the masses of the Chinese nation. His

brother-in-law is the exceedingly able Doctor Ho Kai, Commander of the

Order of Michael and George, the Chinese member of the Legislative

Council of the royal colony of Hongkong Island, a thorough legislator,

a lovable and brilliant man. Wu is a member of a worthy Canton family.

He is a graduate of the Middle Temple, London; has practised before

the Hongkong bar; and he served Li Hung Chang for many years as legal

adviser at Tientsin and Peking, in drawing up foreign treaties, etc.

There were other reformers in China and abroad at work from 1898 to

1911, although the western press gave no attention to the really

astonishing matter. The bitter Hunanese republican rebel, the

irrepressible Hwang Hing, was also exiled by the empress dowager,

Tse Hsi, in 1898. He fled to Japan, with a price on his head also,

and could hardly be restrained from calling the psychic moment for a

revolution into immediate declaration. He was a fast organizer, and

being nearer the ground, was in close enough touch with the Chinese of

the central provinces to be at Wuchang in October, 1911, shortly after

the first blow was struck. He had much to do with the gentry of the

Hupeh and Hunan province guilds, who largely financed and precipitated

the main revolution. Hwang is considered by the extremists of his party

as presidential timber. He is a fervent talker, and like Sun, the last

man in the world to be an opportunist, which is the great Yuan’s one

fault in the minds of many of the Chinese people. Hwang Hing is the one

reformer who has some Japanese sympathies, on account of his education

in Japan. He was born at Changsha in Hunan, where Yale College has a

branch.

In America the editors of the _Chung Sai Yat Po_, the _Chinese World_,

and _Free Press_ in San Francisco; the Chinese Students’ Club in New

York (225 East Thirty-first Street), which publishes a journal, and

the _Chinese Reform News_ in New York, often visited by Sun Yat Sen’s

American representative, Wong Man Su, ably took up the propaganda,

which was carried on in their own way by a thousand newspapers which

arose throughout China from 1906 onward, first in the treaty ports,

and later in Chinese cities, especially Canton, Hankau and Shanghai.

Much reference was made to the fact that while China, the largest

Oriental country, was without a real parliament, other Oriental

countries had successfully overthrown despotism and oligarchism, and

had popular assemblies, which granted some representation in return

for the privilege of taxation. Japan had a Diet; even black Russia had

a Duma; the Filipinos had an Assembly; Turkey had an Assembly; little

Persia had a representative Mejliss; native members had at last been

admitted into the Viceroy’s Council in India; and Hongkong, with its

500,000 Chinese had long had two Chinese as brilliant members of the

Legislative Council.

Viceroy Seu Ki Yu’s essay of 1866, praising Washington and

republicanism as ideal, was reissued and distributed, and had great

influence. By 1909 and 1910 the reformers had compelled the Manchus

to heed the howling of the wind, and see the shadow of a cloud, at

least as big as a man’s hand, on the horizon of internal politics. The

dowager empress, Tse Hsi, and later, Prince Ching, and the regent,

Prince Chun--all Manchus--granted provincial and national assemblies;

but they were called and considered only “Tsecheng Yuan” (advice

boards), and not legislative bodies in the free and full sense of

the word. The pensions of the Manchus and bannermen in the various

Chinese cities were decreased, and land was offered them so that they

might enter the industrial body. Many Manchus rebelled, as at Chingtu

City in September, 1911. Argument increased. The cloud on the horizon

grew larger. Objection was made to the court’s monopoly of the rich

copper mines of Yunnan province, and complaint was reiterated that

while the southern provinces mainly supported the imperial authority

in taxes paid, these provinces were the least consulted, and the

weakest in representation in any governmental consultations that

were held at Peking. The government developed the armies and schools

of the three northern provinces of Pechili, Shangtung and Shansi with

taxes collected mainly in the southern provinces, where the government

neglected schools, police and army divisions. It was hard to get the

Stuart kings to call Parliaments, and when at a belated date they did,

complaint was louder than ever, for there was something to complain of,

and at last a constitutional place to complain in.

These Chinese assemblies gave little representation directly to the

masses, a high property or high tax qualification debarring them as

in Japan; but the gentry of the guilds, in many cases, espoused the

reform sentiment of the masses, exactly as the Stuart Parliaments did

to the disgust of the Stuarts who hoped for monarchic support, and as

the barons of the “Magna Charta” did at Runnymede to the disgust of

Plantagenet John. One provincial assembly president we must note at

this point. He is Tang Hua Lung, of the Hupeh Assembly. When Hankau was

taken on October 10, 1911, Tang jumped to the front as organizer of

the first rebel provincial government; the “province of Hupeh of the

Republic of Han”, with headquarters at Wuchang on the Yangtze River,

the ancient viceregal capital of the illustrious Chang Chih Tung. With

Tang Hua, Sun Yu, brother of Sun Yat Sen, came into prominence. In the

mother province of reform, the most progressive province politically

of all the twenty-one, Kwangtung, Wu Hon Man agitated in his assembly

for reform, and when the imperial viceroy, Chang Ming Chi, fled to

Hongkong, because he could find no other refuge, Wu Hon Man rushed into

the yamen at Canton with the rebelling Sixteenth, and other regiments,

and took charge of that great province for the republican rebels. In

its nationalization-of-railways scheme, the Manchus confiscated the

Kwangtung railways, promising to pay the owners only sixty per cent. of

their investment. Title deeds of mines in Kwangtung and other provinces

were also confiscated by the tyrannical Manchu government.

China’s army was a territorial one. Troops raised in this way are

hard to control in local emergencies, but they are easier to recruit,

mobilize, drill and discipline at the beginning than mixed corps. Among

the Generals of Divisions, transferred from the Navy Department, was Li

Yuan Heng, on whom the revolutionaries largely fixed their hopes as the

man trained and true for the real deeds of deadly arms, which make new

governments possible. Propaganda and patience are all right in their

places, but powder needs a special man of a stern mold, fit to deal

with merciless and terrible enemies. General Li was one of these men,

and General Hwang, Sun Yat Sen’s special representative at the Hankau

and Hanyang battles, was another. General Ling, on the rebels’ right

wing and the republican commander-in-chief, General Hsu Shao Ching,

at Shanghai, were others. General Li’s proclamation of the “Republic

of Han”, with military headquarters at Wuchang, covered the following

points:

1. Expulsion of the Manchu dynasty.

PROHIBITED ON PAIN OF DEATH

2. Injuring foreigners.

3. Injuring business by taking advantage of war.

4. Rapine, arson and adultery.

5. Mobbing.

6. Preventing recruiting.

7. Withstanding commissariat.

TO BE REWARDED HIGHLY

8. Supplying commissariat.

9. Supplying ammunition.

10. Protecting foreign concessions.

11. Protecting foreign missions.

12. Spreading republican and reform (Sia Hwei) propaganda.

13. Facilitating restoration of business and commerce.

General Li, a Hupeh man, was the Marlborough of the revolution, a

young, dashing, Christian soldier, used to courts, fine-looking, full

of humor, traveled, approachable. General Hsu, as the successful siege

of Nanking was later to prove, was the Grant of the revolution, steady,

reasonable, persistent, a spender of men, a strategist and a pounder.

General Li was educated at the Pei Yang naval colleges at Tientsin and

Chifu, and at Japanese military and naval schools at Tokio, Kure and

Yokosuka, where the name of China’s one naval hero of the China-Japan

War, Admiral Ting, of the famous battleships _Chen Yuen_ and _Ting

Yuen_, is held in considerable respect. Li passed through the terrific

fire of the naval engagements of the _Yalu_ and _Wei Hai Wei_ in 1894.

He is a Protestant Episcopalian. He traveled round the world with Li

Hung Chang in 1896, so that America and Britain were then entertaining

unawares one of the Washingtons of republican China.

As general of the Twentieth Division of the northern army, camped at

Lanchow, just east of Peking, was General Chang Shao Tsen (we shall

call him Chang the First to distinguish him from two other generals

Chang of the Manchu camp at Nanking and elsewhere in the northeastern

provinces). Chang the First was well trained by the revolutionists

in their doctrines of liberty, and was told to watch two camps, the

so-called People’s National Assembly at Peking and the Manchu Court

at Peking. Chang the First was trained in war by Yuan Shih Kai and

the Manchu general-in-chief, Yin Tchang, both of whom were effective

men, the former schooled by Tientsin and Peking foreigners, the latter

well trained in the Austrian ranks and before the line of guards at

Berlin. In old Canton, the mighty stanch Wu Hon Man was president of

the provincial assembly of Kwangtung province. He, too, was ready

to declare for rebellion, despite the imperial viceroy, Chang Ming,

and the loyal Tartar general, who were quartered on his province. In

the north, Governor Sun Hao Chi, of classic old Shangtung province

(the home of Confucius), was ready to go over. In the province where

Shanghai is located, the president of the assembly, Chang Chien, who

proposes to visit American chambers of commerce, and who is well known

as the host in China of visiting Pacific coast chambers of commerce,

was more than ready to declare for reform. He, with Wu Ting Fang, was

insistent on the abdication of the Manchu dynasty and the declaration

of a republic.

China Revolutionized · 第 1 / 42 段