Not less eccentric, and far more deeply interesting to us, is the

orbit of the human mind. If, as some have supposed, the comet in its

upward flight is drawn away by the attraction of some other sun,

around which also it bends its course, thus linking another system

with our own, the analogy will be more perfect. For while man is

ever seen rushing with uncontrollable violence toward one or the

other of his opposite extremes, fanaticism and irreligion--at each

of these we find placed an attractive force identical in its nature

and in many of its effects. At each extreme, we find him influenced

by the same prevailing interest--devoting himself to the

accomplishment of the same great object. Happiness is his purpose.

The sources of that, he may be told, are within himself--but his eye

will fix on the external means, and these he will labor to obtain.

Foremost among these, and the equivalent which is to purchase all

the rest, is property. At this all men aim, and their eagerness

seems always proportioned to the excitement, which, from whatever

cause, may for the time prevail. Under such excitement, the many who

want, band themselves together against the few that possess; and the

lawless appetite of the multitude for the property of others calls

itself the spirit of liberty.

In the calm, and, as we would call it, the healthful condition of

the public mind, when every man worships God after his own manner,

and Religion and its duties are left to his conscience and his

Maker, we find each quietly enjoying his own property, and

permitting to others the quiet enjoyment of theirs. Under that state

of things, those modes and forms of liberty which regulate and

secure this enjoyment, are preferred. Peace reigns, the arts

flourish, science extends her discoveries, and man, and the sources

of his enjoyments, are multiplied. But in this condition things

never rest. We have already disclaimed any knowledge of the causes

which forbid this--we only know that such exist. We know that men

are always passing, with fearful rapidity, between the extremes of

fanaticism and irreligion, and that at either extreme, property and

all the governmental machinery provided to guard it, become

insecure. "Down with the Church! Down with the Altar!" is at one

time the cry. "Turn the fat bigots out of their styes, sell the

property of the Church and give the money to the poor!" "Behold our

turn cometh," says the Millenarian. "The kingdoms of this world are

about to become the kingdoms of God and of his Christ. Sell what you

have and give to the poor, and let all things be in common!"

It is now about two hundred years since this latter spirit showed

itself in England with a violence and extravagance which

accomplished the overthrow of all the institutions of that kingdom.

With that we have nothing to do; but we should suppose that the

striking resemblance between the aspect of a certain party in that

country then and now, could hardly escape the English statesman.

Fifty years ago, in France, this eccentric comet, "public

sentiment," was in its opposite node. Making allowance for the

difference in the characters of the two people, the effects were

identical, the apparent causes were the opposites of each other. In

the history of the French Revolution, we find a sort of symptomatic

phenomenon, the memory of which was soon lost in the fearful

exacerbation of the disease. But it should be remembered now, that

in that war against property, the first object of attack was

property in slaves; that in that war on behalf of the alleged right

of man to be discharged from all control of law, the first triumph

achieved was in the emancipation of slaves.

The recent events in the West Indies, and the parallel movement

here, give an awful importance to these thoughts in our minds. They

superinduce a something like despair of success in any attempt that

may be made to resist the attack on all our rights, of which that on

Domestic Slavery (the basis of all our institutions) is but the

precursor. It is a sort of boding that may belong to the family of

superstitions. All vague and undefined fears, from causes the nature

of which we know not, the operations of which we cannot stay, are of

that character. Such apprehensions are alarming in proportion to our

estimate of the value of the interest endangered; and are excited by

every thing which enhances that estimate. Such apprehensions have

been awakened in our minds by the books before us. To Mr. Paulding,

as a Northern man, we tender our grateful thanks for the faithful

picture he has drawn of slavery as it appeared to him in his visit

to the South, and as {338} exhibited in the information he has

carefully derived from those most capable of giving it. His work is

executed in the very happiest manner of an author in whom America

has the greatest reason to rejoice, and will not fail to enhance his

reputation immeasurably as a writer of pure and vigorous English, as

a clear thinker, as a patriot, and as a man. The other publication,

which we take to be from a Southern pen, is more calculated to

excite our indignation against the calumnies which have been put

forth against us, and the wrongs meditated by those who come to us

in the names of our common Redeemer and common country--seeking our

destruction under the mask of Christian Charity and Brotherly Love.

This too is executed with much ability, and may be read with

pleasure as well as profit. While we take great pleasure in

recommending these works to our readers, we beg leave to add a few

words of our own. We are the more desirous to do this, because there

is a view of the subject most deeply interesting to us, which we do

not think has ever been presented, by any writer, in as high relief

as it deserves. We speak of the moral influences flowing from the

relation of master and slave, and the moral feelings engendered and

cultivated by it. A correspondent of Mr. Paulding's justly speaks of

this relation as one partaking of the patriarchal character, and

much resembling that of clanship. This is certainly so. But to say

this, is to give a very inadequate idea of it, unless we take into

consideration the peculiar character (I may say the peculiar nature)

of the negro. Let us reason upon it as we may, there is certainly a

power, in causes inscrutable to us, which works essential changes in

the different races of animals. In their physical constitution this

is obvious to the senses. The color of the negro no man can deny,

and therefore, it was but the other day, that they who will believe

nothing they cannot account for, made this manifest fact an

authority for denying the truth of holy writ. Then comes the

opposite extreme--they are, like ourselves, the sons of Adam, and

must therefore, have like passions and wants and feelings and

tempers in all respects. This, we deny, and appeal to the knowledge

of all who know. But their authority will be disputed, and their

testimony falsified, unless we can devise something to show how a

difference might and should have been brought about. Our theory is a

short one. It was the will of God it should be so. But the

means--how was this effected? We will give the answer to any one who

will develop the causes which might and should have blackened the

negro's skin and crisped his hair into wool. Until that is done, we

shall take leave to speak, as of things _in esse_, of a degree of

loyal devotion on the part of the slave to which the white man's

heart is a stranger, and of the master's reciprocal feeling of

parental attachment to his humble dependant, equally

incomprehensible to him who drives a bargain with the cook who

prepares his food, the servant who waits at his table, and the nurse

who doses over his sick bed. That these sentiments in the breast of

the negro and his master, are stronger than they would be under like

circumstances between individuals of the white race, we believe.

That they belong to the class of feelings "by which the heart is

made better," we know. How come they? They have their rise in the

relation between the infant and the nurse. They are cultivated

between him and his foster brother. They are cherished by the

parents of both. They are fostered by the habit of affording

protection and favors to the younger offspring of the same nurse.

They grow by the habitual use of the word "my," used as the language

of affectionate appropriation, long before any idea of value mixes

with it. It is a term of endearment. That is an easy transition by

which he who is taught to call the little negro "his," in this sense

and _because he loves him_, shall love him _because he is his_. The

idea is not new, that our habits and affections are reciprocally

cause and effect of each other.

But the great teacher in this school of feeling is sickness. In this

school we have witnessed scenes at which even the hard heart of a

thorough bred philanthropist would melt. But here, we shall be told,

it is not humanity, but interest that prompts. Be it so. Our

business is not with the cause but the effect. But is it interest,

which, with assiduous care, prolongs the life of the aged and

decrepid negro, who has been, for years, a burthen? Is it interest

which labors to rear the crippled or deformed urchin, who can never

be any thing but a burthen--which carefully feeds the feeble lamp of

life that, without any appearance of neglect, might be permitted to

expire? Is not the feeling more akin to that parental στοργη, which,

in defiance of reason, is most careful of the life which is, all the

time, felt to be a curse to the possessor. Are such cases rare? They

are as rare as the occasions; but let the occasion occur, and you

will see the case. How else is the longevity of the negro

proverbial? A negro who does no work for thirty years! (and we know

such examples) is it interest which has lengthened out his

existence?

Let the philanthropist think as he may--by the negro himself, his

master's care of him in sickness is not imputed to interested

feelings. We know an instance of a negress who was invited by a

benevolent lady in Philadelphia to leave her mistress. The lady

promised to secrete her for a while, and then to pay her good wages.

The poor creature felt the temptation and was about to yield. "You

are mighty good, madam," said she "and I am a thousand times obliged

to you. And if I am sick, or any thing, I am sure you will take care

of me, and nurse me, like my good mistress used to do, and bring me

something warm and good to comfort me, and tie up my head and fix my

pillow." She spoke in the simplicity of her heart, and the tempter

had not the heart to deceive her. "No," said she "all _that_ will

come out of your wages--for you will have money enough to hire a

nurse." The tears had already swelled into the warm hearted

creature's eyes, at her own recital of her mistress's kindness. They

now gushed forth in a flood, and running to her lady who was a

lodger in the house, she threw herself on her knees, confessed her

fault, was pardoned, and was happy.

But it is not by the bedside of the sick negro that the feeling we

speak of is chiefly engendered. They who would view it in its causes

and effects must see him by the sick bed of his master--must see

_her_ by the sick bed of her _mistress_. We have seen these things.

We have seen the dying infant in the lap of its nurse, and have

stood with the same nurse by the bed side of her own dying child.

Did mighty nature assert her empire, and wring from the mother's

heart more and bitterer tears than she had shed over her foster

babe? None that {339} the eye of man could distinguish. And he who

sees the heart--did he see dissimulation giving energy to the

choking sobs that _seemed_ to be rendered more vehement by her

attempts to repress them? _Philanthropy_ may think so if it pleases.

A good lady was on her death bed. Her illness was long and

protracted, but hopeless from the first. A servant, (by no means a

favorite with her, being high tempered and ungovernable) was

advanced in pregnancy, and in bad health. Yet she could not be kept

out of the house. She was permitted to stay about her mistress

during the day, but sent to bed at an early hour every night. Her

reluctance to obey was obvious, and her master found that she evaded

his order, whenever she could escape his eye. He once found her in

the house late at night, and kindly reproving her, sent her home. An

hour after, suddenly going out of the sick room, he stumbled over

her in the dark. She was crouched down at the door, listening for

the groans of the sufferer. She was again ordered home, and turned

to go. Suddenly she stopped, and bursting into tears, said, "Master

it aint no use for me to go to bed, Sir. It don't do me no good, I

cannot sleep, Sir."

Such instances prove that in reasoning concerning the moral effect

of slavery, he who regards man as a unit, the same under all

circumstances, leaves out of view an important consideration. The

fact that he is not so, is manifest to every body--but the

application of the fact to this controversy is not made. The author

of "The South Vindicated" quotes at page 228, a passage from

Lamartine, on this very point, though he only uses it to show the

absurdity of any attempt at amalgamation. The passage is so apt to

our purpose that we beg leave to insert it.

The more I have travelled, the more I am convinced _that the races

of men form the great secret of history and manners_. Man is not so

capable of education as philosophers imagine. The influence of

governments and laws has less power, radically, than is supposed,

over the manners and instincts of any people, while the primitive

constitution and the blood of the race have always their influence,

and manifest themselves, thousands of years afterwards, in the

physical formations and moral habits of a particular family or

tribe. Human nature flows in rivers and streams into the vast ocean

of humanity; but its waters mingle but slowly, sometimes never; and

it emerges again, like the Rhone from the Lake of Geneva, with its

own taste and color. Here is indeed an abyss of thought and

meditation, and at the same time a grand secret for legislators. As

long as they keep the spirit of the race in view they succeed; but

they fail when they strive against this natural predisposition:

nature is stronger than they are. This sentiment is not that of the

philosophers of the present time, but it is evident to the

traveller; and there is more philosophy to be found in a caravan

journey of a hundred leagues, than in ten years' reading and

meditation.

There is much truth here, though certainly not what passes for truth

with those who study human nature wholly in the closet, and in

reforming the world address themselves exclusively to the faults of

_others_, and the evils of which they know the least, and which

least concern themselves.

We hope the day has gone by when we are to be judged by the

testimony of false, interested, and malignant accusers alone. We

repeat that we are thankful to Mr. Paulding for having stepped

forward in our defence. Our assailants arc numerous, and it is

indispensable that we should meet the assault with vigor and

activity. Nothing is wanting but manly discussion to convince our

own people at least, that in continuing to command the services of

their slaves, they violate no law divine or human, and that in the

faithful discharge of their reciprocal obligations lies their true

duty. Let these be performed, and we believe (with our esteemed

correspondent Professor Dew) that society in the South will derive

much more of good than of evil from this much abused and

partially-considered institution.

BRUNNENS OF NASSAU.

_Bubbles from the Brunnens of Nassau. By an Old Man. New York:

Harper and Brothers._

This "old man" is the present Governor of Canada, and a very amusing

"old man" is he. A review of his work, which appeared a year ago in

the North American, first incited us to read it, a pleasure which

necessity has compelled us to forego until the present time--there

not having been an American edition put to press until now, and the

splendid hot-pressed, calf-bound, gilt-edged edition from

Albemarle-street being too costly for very general circulation here.

The "bubbles" are blown into being by a gentleman who represents

himself as having been sentenced, in the cold evening of his life,

to drink the mineral waters of Nassau; and who, upon arriving at the

springs, found that, in order to effect the cure designed by his

physicians, the mind was to be relaxed as the body was being

strengthened. The result of this regimen was the production of "The

Bubbles," or hasty sketches of whatever chanced for the moment to

please either the eyes or the mind of the patient. He anticipates

the critic's verdict as to his book--that it is empty, light, vain,

hollow and superficial: "but then," says he, "it is the nature of

'bubbles' to be so."

He describes his voyage from the Custom House Stairs in the Thames,

by steamboat to Rotterdam, and thence his journey to the Nassau

springs of _Langen-Schwalbach_, _Schlangen-bad_, _Nieder-selters_,

and _Wiesbaden_. Here he spends a season, bathing and drinking the

waters of those celebrated springs, and describing such incidents as

occurred to relieve the monotony of his somewhat idle life, in a

most agreeable and _taking_ way. To call this work facetious, as

that term is commonly used, were not perhaps to give so accurate an

idea of its style as might be conveyed by the adjective whimsical.

Without subjecting the "old man" to the imputation of _copyism_, one

may describe the manner as being an agreeable mixture of _Charles

Lamb's_ and _Washington Irving's_. The same covert conceit, the same

hidden humor, the same piquant allusion, which, while you read,

place the author bodily before you, a quiet old gentleman fond of

his ease, but fonder of his joke--not a broad, forced, loud,

vacant-minded joke, but a quiet, pungent, sly, laughter-moving

conceit, which, at first stirring the finest membranes of your

_pericardium_, at length sets you out into a broad roar of laughter,

honest fellow as you are, and which you must be, indeed, a very

savage, if you can avoid.

Our bubble-blower observes everything within the sphere of his

vision, and even makes a most amusing chapter out of "The

schwein-general," or pig-drover of Schlangen-bad, which we wish we

had space for entire. As it is, we give some reflections upon "the

pig," {340} as being perfectly characteristic of the author's

peculiar style.

There exists perhaps in creation no animal which has less justice

and more injustice done to him by man than the pig. Gifted with

every faculty of supplying himself, and of providing even against

the approaching storm, which no creature is better capable of

foretelling than a pig, we begin by putting an iron ring through the

cartilage of his nose, and having thus barbarously deprived him of

the power of searching for, and analyzing his food, we generally

condemn him for the rest of his life to solitary confinement in a

sty.

While his faculties are still his own, only observe how, with a bark

or snort, he starts if you approach him, and mark what shrewd

intelligence there is in his bright, twinkling little eye; but with

pigs, as with mankind, idleness is the root of all evil. The poor

animal, finding that he has absolutely nothing to do--having no

enjoyment--nothing to look forward to but the pail which feeds him,

naturally most eagerly, or as we accuse him, most greedily, greets

its arrival. Having no natural business or diversion--nothing to

occupy his brain--the whole powers of his system are directed to the

digestion of a superabundance of food. To encourage this, nature

assists him with sleep, which lulling his better faculties, leads

his stomach to become the ruling power of his system--a tyrant that

can bear no one's presence but his own. The poor pig, thus treated,

gorges himself--sleeps--eats again--sleeps--wakens in a

fright--screams--struggles against the blue apron--screams fainter

and fainter--turns up the whites of his little eyes--and--dies!

It is probably from abhorring this picture, that I know of nothing

which is more distressing to me than to witness an indolent man

eating his own home-fed pork.

There is something so horribly similar between the life of the human

being and that of his victim--their notions on all subjects are so

unnaturally contracted--there is such a melancholy resemblance

between the strutting residence in the village, and the stalking

confinement in the sty--between the sound of the dinner-bell and the

rattling of the pail--between snoring in an armchair and grunting in

clean straw--that, when I contrast the "pig's countenance" in the

dish with that of his lord and master, who, with outstretched

elbows, sits leaning over it, I own I always feel it is so hard the

one should have killed the other.--In short there is a sort of "Tu

quoque, BRUTE!" moral in the picture, which to my mind is most

painfully distressing.

The author thus speaks in relation to the mineral water of

Wiesbaden.

In describing the taste of the mineral water of Wiesbaden, were I to

say, that while drinking it, one hears in one's ears the cackling of

hens, and that one sees feathers flying before one's eyes, I should

certainly grossly exaggerate; but when I declare that it exactly

resembles very hot chicken-broth, I only say what Dr. Granville

said, and what in fact everybody says, and must say, respecting it;

and certainly I do wonder why the common people should be at the

inconvenience of making bad soup, when they can get much better from

nature's great stock pot--the Koch-brunnen of Wiesbaden. At all

periods of the year, summer or winter, the temperature of this broth

remains the same, and when one reflects that it has been bubbling

out of the ground, and boiling over in the same state, certainly

from the time of the Romans, and probably from the time of the

flood, it is really astonishing to think what a most wonderful

apparatus there must exist below, what an inexhaustible stock of

provisions to ensure such an everlasting supply of broth, always

formed of exactly the same degree, and always served up at exactly

the same heat.

One would think that some of the particles in the recipe would be

exhausted; in short, to speak metaphorically, that the chickens

would at last be boiled to rags, or that the fire would go out for

want of coals; but the oftener one reflects on these sort of

subjects, the oftener is the old-fashioned observation repeated,

that let a man go where he will, Omnipotence is never from his view.

It is good they say for the stomach--good for the skin--good for

ladies of all possible ages--for all sorts and conditions of men.

For a headache, drink, the inn-keepers exclaim, at the Koch-brunnen.

For gout in the heels, soak the body, the doctors say, in the

chicken-broth!--in short, the valetudinarian, reclining in his

carriage, has scarcely entered the town, say what he will of

himself, the inhabitants all seem to agree in repeating--"_Bene bene

respondere, dignus est intrare nostro docto corpore!_"

There was something to my mind so very novel in bathing in broth,

that I resolved to try the experiment, particularly as it was the

only means I had of following the crowd. Accordingly, retiring to my

room, in a minute or two I also, in my slippers and black

dressing-gown was to be seen, staff in hand, mournfully walking down

the long passage, as slowly and as gravely as if I had been in such

a profession all my life. An infirm elderly lady was just before

me--some lighter-sounding footsteps were behind me--but without

raising our eyes from the ground, we all moved on, just as if we had

been corpses gliding or migrating from one church yard to another.

The door was now closed, and my dressing-gown being carefully hung

upon a peg, (a situation I much envied it,) I proceeded,

considerably against my inclination, to introduce myself to my new

acquaintance, whose face, or surface, was certainly very revolting;

for a white, thick, dirty, greasy scum, exactly resembling what

would be on broth, covered the top of the bath. But all this, they

say is exactly as it should be; and indeed, German bathers at

Wiesbaden actually insist on its appearance, as it proves, they

argue, that the bath has not been used by any one else. In most

places in ordering a warm bath, it is necessary to wait till the

water be heated, but at Wiesbaden, the springs are so exceedingly

hot, that the baths are obliged to be filled over night, in order to

be cool enough in the morning; and the dirty scum I have mentioned

is the required proof that the water has, during that time, been

undisturbed.

Resolving not to be bullied by the ugly face of my antagonist, I

entered my bath, and in a few seconds I lay horizontally, calmly

soaking, like my neighbors.

Here is a characteristic _crayoning_:

As soon as breakfast was over, I generally enjoyed the luxury of

idling about the town: and, in passing the shop of a blacksmith, who

lived opposite to the Goldene Kette, the manner in which he tackled

and shod a vicious horse amused me. On the outside wall of the house

two rings were firmly fixed, to one of which the head of the patient

was lashed close to the ground; the hind foot, to be shod, stretched

out to the utmost extent of the leg, was then secured to the other

ring about five feet high, by a cord which passed through a cloven

hitch, fixed to the root of the poor creature's tail.

The hind foot was consequently very much higher than the head;

indeed, it was so exalted, and pulled so heavily at the tail, that

the animal seemed to be quite anxious to keep his other feet on

_terra firma_. With one hoof in the heavens, it did not suit him to

kick; with his nose pointing to the infernal regions, he could not

conveniently rear, and as the devil himself was apparently pulling

at his tail, the horse at last gave up the point, and quietly

submitted to be shod.

* * * * *

Mr. Fay wishes us to believe that the sale of a book is the proper

test of its merit. To save time and trouble we _will_ believe it,

and are prepared to acknowledge, as a consequence of the theory,

that the novel of Norman Leslie is not at all comparable to the

Memoirs of Davy Crockett, or the popular lyric of Jim Crow.

{341} SUPPLEMENT.

At the solicitation of our correspondents, we again publish some few

of the _Notices of the Messenger_, which have lately appeared in the

papers of the day. The supplement now printed contains probably

about one fifth of the flattering evidences of public favor which

have reached us, from all quarters, within a few weeks. Those

selected are a fair sample of the general character of the whole.

From the Charlottesville Advocate.

_The Southern Literary Messenger_.--We have been favored by Mr.

White, the proprietor, with the March No. of this periodical. The

delay in the publication has been occasioned by the desire of Mr.

White to insert Prof. Dew's Address. However desirable a regular and

punctual issue may be, we are disposed to excuse the delay on the

present occasion, for the reason assigned.

As the Messenger has now passed through the difficulties attendant

on new enterprises, is on a permanent footing, and has vindicated

its claims to rank among the first of American Periodicals, we

commenced the perusal of the present number, predetermined to

censure whenever we could get the slightest pretext. We have read it

calmly and with a "critic's eye," and though it is not faultless,

for with two exceptions the poetry is below mediocrity, we have been

so delighted with most of the articles, as not to have the heart to

censure. We candidly regard it the best single number of any

American periodical we have ever seen. Mr. Dew's Address and Mr.

Stanton's Essay on Manual Labor Schools, are articles of enduring

and inestimable worth.

We subjoin the following notice of the contents from the Richmond

Compiler, with which we in the main concur.

From the Richmond Compiler.

We have already announced the appearance of the Literary Messenger

for March 1836. We always read the work with pleasure, and have

frequently awarded to it the high praise it so well deserves. In the

present instance, we are forcible struck with a sort of merit so

rare in publications of the kind, that, to a certain class of

readers, our praise may sound like censure.

We hazard nothing in saying, that in the pages before us, there is

more substantial matter, more information, more food for the mind,

and more provocative to thought, than we have ever seen in any

periodical of a miscellaneous character. A chapter from Lionel

Granby--a _jeu d'esprit_ from Mr. Poe--some of the reviews--and a

page or two of description--together with a very few metrical

lines--make the sum total of light reading.

We would not be understood to mean that the rest is heavy. Far from

it. But we want some word to distinguish that which ought to be read

and studied, from that which may be read for amusement only. He who

shall read the rest of the number, must be very careless or very

dull, if he is not edified and instructed. We will add, that his

taste must be bad, if he is not tempted to receive the instruction

here offered by the graces of style, the originality of thought, and

the felicity of illustration, with which the gravest of these

articles abounds.

This remark applies in all its force to Professor Dew's Address,

which all who cherish a well-balanced love, at once for the

Sovereignty and the Union of these States, will read with delight.

Those who have yet to acquire this sentiment, will read it with

profit. If there be any man who doubts the peculiar advantages,

moral, intellectual and pecuniary of a system of federative harmony,

contradistinguished from consolidation on the one hand, and disunion

on the other, let him read, and doubt no more.

A subject of less vivid interest has been treated in a style at once

amusing and instructive, by the author of the Essay on the Classics.

No one can read that essay, without feeling that there must be

something to refine and sublime the mind of man in the studies in

which the writer is so obviously a proficient. Are these the

thoughts? are these the images and illustrations? is this the

language, with which the study of the classics makes a man familiar?

Then it is true, as the poet has said:

"Ingenuas didicisse fideliter artes

Emollit mores, nec sinit esse feros."

"_Mutatis mutandis_," we would award the same general praise to an

Essay on Education, and to the addresses from Judge Tucker of the

Court of Appeals, and Mr. Maxwell of Norfolk. As to the continuation

of the Sketches of African History, it is enough to say that it is a

continuation worthy of what has gone before.

The reviews are, as usual, piquant and lively, and in that style

which will teach writers to value the praise and dread the censures

of the critic. Among the articles reviewed, we are pleased at the

appearance of Dr. Hawk's historical work. We are delighted, too, to

find him, though not a Virginian, coming to the rescue of Virginia,

from the misjudged or disingenuous praises of men who knew not how

to appreciate the character of our ancestors. No. _It is a new thing

with Virginians to lean to the side of power._ Those who have taught

her that lesson, have found her an unapt scholar. The spirit of

Virginia tends _upwards_, and we have all seen

"With what compulsion, and laborious flight,"

she has sunk to her present degraded condition.

To think of our fathers, as they stood 180 years ago, yielding with

undisguised reluctance to inevitable necessity; and, in the very act

of _submission_ to the _power_ of the usurper, denying his _right_,

and protesting that they owed him no _obedience_! And we, the

sons--what are we?

"'Twere long to tell, and sad to trace

Each step from glory to disgrace:

Enough!--No foreign foe could quell

Her soul, 'till from itself it fell;

And self-abasement paved the way

To villain bonds and despot sway."

From the Baltimore Patriot.

_The Southern Literary Messenger_, for March, is just out: late in

the day, it is true, but not any the less acceptable on that

account. We have just risen from a faithful perusal of its contents,

which are of uncommon richness and value. Its merits are solid, not

superficial: and therein it is more worthy of the support of the

lovers of literature, than any other literary Magazine published in

our country. We mean what we say, disdainful of the imputation of

being thought capable of a puff. It is a repository of works "to

keep," and not of the trash which "perisheth in the using." Still it

has variety. It combines the _utile et dulce_ in a most attractive

and pleasing degree, and there is no lack of that "change" of which

the poet says the "mind of desultory man" is "studious."

We will give the readers of the Patriot a bird's eye view of the

contents of the number we have just laid down, in illustration and

corroboration of what we have said in relation to its merits.

_Sketches of Tripoli, No. XI._--One may gather a very good idea of

the present condition of the Barbary States, from a perusal of these

graphic papers. We know no others extant so attractive and so

satisfactory. They are written in a pure and refined style, and form

a very valuable and interesting history.

"_The Classics_" is the title of one of the most splendid articles

we have ever perused in any shape. This one paper would be cheaply

purchased by the scholar, at the subscription fee for the volume. It

is a defence of the Classics and a classical education, against the

modern innovations of the romantic school. The writer makes out his

case most ably and convincingly,--showing himself to be well fitted

for the task he assumed, by the devotedness with which he has

worshipped at the pure shrine to which he would win his readers. We

wish we were sure that we had said enough to draw a general

attention to this admirable article.

{342} _A Loan to the Messenger_, including _Life_, a Brief History,

in three parts, with a sequel, by CUTTER, is not only "exceedingly

neat," but surpassingly beautiful. It is a rare instance of the

union of tender sentiment and epigrammatic point. For example--

A purpose, and a prayer;

The stars are in the sky--

He wonders how e'en Hope should dare

To let him aim so high!

Still Hope allures and flatters

And Doubt just makes him bold:

And so, with passion all in tatters,

The trembling tale is told!

_Readings with my Pencil_, No. III, a most excellent article--full

of poetical thoughts and, generally speaking, profound ones. We

agree with J. F. O. cordially, in his opinion of _Burns_, in the

case "_Burns vs. Moore_." Yet there are not many who will so agree

with him. _Reading No. 12_, is more regardful of words than things.

Dr. Johnson was right, we think, in saying that "the suspicion of

Swift's irreligion proceeded, in a great measure, from his dread of

hypocrisy," and J. F. O. is wrong in therefore concluding that

"Swift, according to Johnson, was afraid of being thought a

hypocrite and so actually became one." But of this J. F. O. was well

aware--he could not think, however of sacrificing the antithesis.

Let him examine the word _hypocrisy_ and ascertain its _popular_

meaning, for thereby hangs the tale. A man who feigns a character

which he does not possess, is not necessarily a hypocrite. The

_popular_ acceptation of hypocrisy requires that being vicious, he

shall feign virtue. This the very intelligent author of _Readings

with My Pencil_ will not fail to perceive at once. These readings

are far better than nine-tenths of the _fudge_ of _Lacon_--or the

purer _fudge_ of _Rochefoucault_.

_Halley's Comet_.--After Miss Draper's stanzas thus entitled, the

poet of "Prince Edward" should not have sent his to the Messenger.

We cannot call this poetry or philosophy,--it was not intended

obviously as burlesque.

Art thou the ship of heaven, laden with light,

From the eternal glory sent,

To feed the glowing suns, that might

In ceaseless radiance but for thee be spent?

_Epimanes_.--This is one of Poe's queerities. He takes the reader

back in supposition to the city of Antioch, in the year of the world

3830, and in that peculiar style, which after all must be called

_Poe-tical_, because it is just that and nothing else, he feigns the

enactment of a real scene of the times before your eyes. The actors

"come like shadows, so depart,"--but yet assume a most vivid reality

while they stay. We hope this powerful pen will be again similarly

employed.

"_To Helen_" is a pretty little gem, and from the same mine. It

shall glisten in the Patriot ere long.

In the _Poetry of Burns_, by JAMES F. OTIS, we see much of the fine

lyrical feeling which distinguishes the "_Readings with My Pencil_."

The subject, to be sure, is _au peu passe_--but we can hardly have

too much of BURNS. Mr. OTIS seems fully to understand and appreciate

him.

"_Change_"--pretty verses, but not poetry. The four last lines

should always be at least _as good_ as the rest. One judges of the

flavor of a fruit by the taste it _leaves_ in the mouth. Apply this

hint to these verses.

The next paper is an Address delivered before the Literary Institute

at Hampden Sidney College by Mr. STANTON, upon the importance of

"_Manual Labor Schools_," as connected with literary institutions.

It is an admirable production; and one of that class of papers which

go to make the "Messenger" what we have already designated it, the

only Literary Magazine now set up in this country deserving the

name.

An interesting description of a Natural Bridge in South America,

that the writer thinks more sublime than that in Virginia (which we

can hardly credit)--some dozen lines about Washington, good only for

filling in the spare nook they occupy, and an epigram without point,

next follow, and these are succeeded by another South American

sketch, describing a waterfall, of great beauty.

We cannot say much in favor of the "_Song of Lee's Legion_," nor

will we say much against it. We wish the poetry of the Messenger

were of a higher order. At present it does not hold equality with

the prose department, by any means.

"_Lionel Granby_" is written with much spirit, and the present (the

eleventh) chapter is one of the best. We will review this whole

story, at length, when completed. We think it equal to any of the

novellettes which it has now become so fashionable to publish in

this form: although that form, so full of interruptions as it is,

prevents that enjoyment in perusal which would be derived from the

possession of the work entire.

"_The Patriarch's Inheritance_."--Rich language, fine conception,

smooth versification. "T. H. S." improves.

_Americanisms:_ Captions.--We are too apt to bark before we are

bitten; and there was no especial need that "H." should growl at

BULWER, because he had made a very good terse word to express

_greedy_, from the Latin _avidus_, merely by way of vindicating our

people from old charges of a similar character.

Stanzas _To Randolph of Roanoke_, written soon after his death. We

cannot say that Hesperus has done enough in this effusion to induce

us to alter our verdict upon the poetry of the Messenger. As the

stanzas appear to be a matter of feeling with the author, we will

not enter into a discussion of the sentiments they contain. We would

advise him to try another kind of theme.

_Address_, by the Hon. HENRY ST. GEORGE TUCKER, before the Virginia

Historical and Philosophical Society--a most admirable paper. It was

delivered upon the distinguished author's taking the seat vacated by

the late Chief Justice MARSHALL, as President of the above named

Society; and is, mostly, a beautiful eulogy upon his illustrious

predecessor. It is just such a production as our knowledge of the

author would have led us to anticipate from him--alike creditable to

his head, stored with the lore of ages, and to his heart, full of

the kindest and most benevolent feelings.

Mr. MAXWELL'S Speech, before the Virginia Historical and

Philosophical Society, at its late annual meeting, another eloquent

eulogy upon the lamented MARSHALL. Virginia seems to be taking the

most serene delight in wreathing garlands around his tomb, and this

is one of the most verdant, and promises to be one of the most

enduring. It is short, but breathes eloquently forth a spirit which

will impress it upon the minds and memories of hearers and readers.

It is a high compliment to the MESSENGER, and a pregnant proof of

the estimation into which that journal has worthily grown that it is

made the medium of conveying such productions to posterity.

But the most valuable paper in the number is an Address on the

influence of the Federative Republican System of Government upon

Literature, and the Development of Character, by Professor Dew. We

have never perused a more able literary essay than this address. The

author traverses the whole field of literature, and draws from the

stores of antiquity lessons for the improvement of his own

countrymen in literature, art, and politics. We commend it to the

perusal of every American.

Then follow "_Critical Notices_." These are written by POE. They are

few and clever. The sledge-hammer and scimetar are laid aside, and

not one poor devil of an author is touched, except one "Mahmoud,"

who is let off with a box on the ear for plagiarism. The review of

"Georgia Scenes" has determined us to buy the book. The extracts are

irresistible.

The merit of this number consists in its solidity. The same amount

of reading, of a similar character, can certainly no where and in no

other form be furnished the reader on the same terms. It is our duty

no less than our interest to sustain 'the Messenger.'

{343} From the Norfolk Herald.

_Southern Literary Messenger_.--No. 4, Vol. 2, of this Journal is

just issued, and contains 16 pages of matter over and above its

usual quantity--that is, it contains 80 closely printed pages in

place of 64, its promised amount. A very slight inspection will

convince any one at all conversant in these matters that the present

number of the Messenger embraces as much reading matter (if not

considerably more) than four ordinary volumes, such for example, as

the volumes of Paul Ulric or Norman Leslie. Of the value of the

matter, or rather of its value in comparison with such ephemera as

these just mentioned, it is of course unnecessary to say much.

Popular opinion has placed the Messenger in a very enviable position

as regards the Literature of the South. We have no hesitation in

saying that it has elevated it immeasurably. To use the words of a

Northern contemporary "it has done more within the last six months

to refine the literary standard in this country than has been

accomplished before in the space of ten years."

The number before us commences with No. XI. (continued) of the

_Tripolitan Sketches_. We can add nothing to the public voice in

favor of this series of papers. They are excellent--and the one for

this month is equal to any in point of interest.

_The Classics_ is a most admirable paper--indeed one of the most

forcible, and strange to say, one of the most original defences of

Ancient Literature we have ever perused. We do not, however,

altogether like the sneers at Bulwer in the beginning of the

article. They should have been omitted, for they are not only

unjust, but they make against the opinions advanced. Bulwer is not

only a ripe scholar, but an advocate of classical acquirement.

_A Loan to the Messenger_, is beautiful--very beautiful--witness the

following--

Sonnets and serenades,

Sighs, glances, tears, and vows,

Gifts, tokens, souvenirs, parades,

And courtesies and bows.

A purpose, and a prayer:

The stars are in the sky--

He wonders how e'en hope should dare

To let him aim so high!

Still Hope allures and flatters,

And Doubt just makes him bold:

And so, with passion all in tatters,

The trembling tale is told!

_Readings with My Pencil, No. 2._ is a fine article in the manner of

Colton. A true sentiment well expressed is contained in the

concluding words: "I am one of those who are best when most

afflicted. While the weight hangs heavily, I keep time and measure,

like a clock; but remove it, and all the springs and wheels move

irregularly, and I am but a mere useless thing."

_Halley's Comet_----so, so.

_Epimanes_. By Edgar A. Poe--an historical tale in which, by

imaginary incidents, the character of Antiochus Epiphanes is vividly

depicted. It differs essentially from all the other tales of Mr.

Poe. Indeed no two of his articles bear more than a family

resemblance to one another. They all differ widely in matter, and

still more widely in manner. _Epimanes_ will convince all who read

it that Mr. P. is capable of even higher and better things.

_To Helen_--by the same author--a sonnet full of quiet grace--we

quote it in full.

Helen, thy beauty is to me

Like those Nicean barks of yore

That, gently, o'er a perfum'd sea,

The weary, wayworn wanderer bore

To his own native shore.

On desperate seas long wont to roam,

Thy hyacinth hair, thy classic face,

Thy Naiad airs have brought me home

To the beauty of fair Greece

And the grandeur of old Rome.

Lo! in that little window-niche

How statue-like I see thee stand;

The folded scroll within thy hand--

Ah! Psyche from the regions which

Are Holy land!

_On the Poetry of Burns. By James F. Otis_--a good essay on a

threadbare subject--one, too, but very lately handled in the

Messenger by Larry Lyle.

_Change_--has some fine thoughts, for example,

----My little playmate crew

Have slept to wake no more

Till Change itself shall cease to be,

And one successive scene

Of steadfastness immutable

Remain where Change hath been.

_Manual Labor Schools--By the Rev. E. F. Stanton_ is an essay which,

while we disagree with it in some of its results, will serve to

convince any one of the absolute importance of exercise to men of

sedentary habits or occupations.

_Song of Lee's Legion_--very spirited verses.

_Natural Bridge of Pandi_, and _Fall of Tequendama_ are both

acceptable articles.

_Lines on the Statue of Washington in the Capitol_, although a

little rugged in conclusion, are terse and forcible, and embody many

eloquent sentiments. We recognize one of our most distinguished

men--a fellow-townsman too--in the nerve and vigor of these verses.

The _Epigram_ below them is not worth much.

_The Patriarch's Inheritance_--majestic and powerful.

_Americanisms_--a very good article, and very true.

_To Randolph of Roanoke_. These lines have some fine points and the

versification is good--but we do not like them upon the whole.

_Judge Tucker's Address_, and _Mr. Maxwell's Speech_ before the

Virginia Historical and Philosophical society, we read with much

interest. Things of this nature are apt to be common place unless

the speakers are men of more than ordinary _tact_. There is no

deficiency, however, in the present instance. Mr. Maxwell's speech,

especially, is exceedingly well adapted to produce effect in

delivery--more particularly in such delivery as Mr. Maxwell's.

The _Address of Professor Dew_ is, beyond doubt, an article of great

ability, and must excite strong attention, wherever it is read. It

occupies full 20 pages--which, perhaps, could not have been better

occupied. He has fully proved that a Republic such as ours, is the

fairest field in the world for the growth and florescence of

Literature.

The _Critical Notices_ maintain their lofty reputation--but as they

will assuredly be read by all parties, and as we have already

exceeded our limits, we forbear to enter into detail. The Messenger

is no longer a query, it has earned a proud name. It demands

encouragement and _will have it_.

From the Cincinnati Mirror.

_The Southern Literary Messenger for February_, is before us. It is

made up, as usual, of a very interesting miscellany of original

articles. This magazine is rapidly winning a high estimate for the

literature of the South. Its pages contain as good articles as any

other Monthly in the country. Its correspondents are numerous and

able, and its editor wields the gray goose quill like one who knows

what he is about, and who has a right to. Commend us to the literary

notices of this Magazine for genius, spice and spirit. Those which

are commendatory, are supported by the real merit of the books

themselves; but woe seize on the luckless wights who feel the savage

skill with which the editor uses his tomahawk and scalping knife.

The fact is, the Messenger is not given to the mincing of

matter--what it has to say is said fearlessly.

From the Boston Galaxy.

_Smarting under Criticism_.--Fay can't bear criticism. The Southern

Literary Messenger cut him up sharply--and Fay has

retorted--evincing that the sting rankles. A pity.

{344} From the Natchez Christian Herald.

_The Southern Literary Messenger_.--This elegantly printed Magazine

is issued monthly from the classic press of T. W. White, Esq.

Richmond, Va., and has, during the year elapsed since its

commencement, won a commanding share of public approbation and

attention. It is truly a high-minded and liberal specimen of

southern literature, on which is deeply engraved the impressions of

Southern character and feeling. We admire the periodical more on

that account. It has a glow of enthusiasm, offering to the public,

if not the very best, yet the best productions it can command, with

a sort of chivalrous hospitality which cannot but remind one of the

gentlemanly southron at his fireside.

Among the contributions of original articles for this magazine we

cannot but notice the able historical papers entitled "Sketches of

the history and present condition of Tripoli, with some account of

the other Barbary states." These finely written papers have appeared

in ten consecutive numbers of the Literary Messenger, and, together

with "Extracts from my Mexican Journal," and "Extracts from an

unpublished abridgement of the History of Virginia," furnish a

valuable mass of the most useful information. The poetic writers for

the Messenger, as a whole, are not the favorites of the Muses, and

will no doubt be summoned to give an account of the cruel manner in

which they have distorted the pure English in giving utterance to

the spasmodic emotions of the _fytte_ which they may have imagined

was upon them like an inspiration.

There is one department which we admire--the editorial criticisms.

Racy, pungent, and reasonable, the editor writes as one disposed to

test the true elements of authorship, and to weigh pretentions with

achievements in the opposite scale. He has gently, yet with almost

too daring a hand, taken apart the poetical attire of two or three

ladies, whose writings have long been ranked among the better

specimens of American poetry. He almost dares to hint that Mrs.

Sigourney has, by forcing her short scraps of poetry into half the

newspapers in the land, gained a wider fame than many a better poet

who may have spent a life in maturing and polishing one poem which

appears to the world, as poems should, in a dignified volume. He

also makes the same charge of the "_frequency_ of her appeals to the

attention of the public" against Miss Gould, and institutes the

following comparison between the productions of the two authors:

'The faults which we have already pointed out, and some others which

we will point out hereafter, are but dust in the balance, when

weighed against her (Mrs. Sigourney's) very many and distinguished

excellences. Among those high qualities which give her beyond doubt,

a title to the sacred name of poet, are an acute sensibility to

natural loveliness--a quick and perfectly just conception of the

moral and physical sublime--a calm and unostentatious vigor of

thought--a mingled delicacy and strength of expression--and above

all, a mind nobly and exquisitely attuned to all the gentle

charities and lofty pieties of life.

'We have already pointed out the prevailing characteristics of Mrs.

Sigourney. In Miss Gould, we recognize, first, a disposition, like

that of Wordsworth, to seek beauty where it is not usually

sought--in the _homeliness_ (if we may be permitted the word,) and

in the most familiar realities of existence--secondly _abandon_ of

manner--thirdly a phraseology sparkling with antithesis, yet,

strange to say, perfectly simple and unaffected.

'Without Mrs. Sigourney's high reach of thought, Miss Gould

surpasses her rival in the mere vehicle of thought--expression.

"Words, words, words," are the true secret of her strength. _Words_

are her kingdom--and in the realm of language she rules with equal

despotism and _nonchalance_. Yet we do not mean to deny her

abilities of a higher order than any which a mere _logomachy_ can

imply. Her powers of imagination are great, and she has a faculty of

inestimable worth, when considered in relation to effect--the

faculty of holding ordinary ideas in so novel, and sometimes in so

fantastic a light, as to give them all the appearance, and much of

the value of originality. Miss Gould will, of course, be the

favorite with the multitude--Mrs. Sigourney with the few.'

American prose writers and novelists are led under this keen

critic's knife, as sheep to the slaughter. In the name of literature

we thank Mr. White for his criticisms, that must purify the

literary, as lightning does the natural atmosphere.

The Southern Literary Messenger is published on the first day of

every month, containing 64 pages in each number, printed on good

paper with a beautiful type. The terms are only _five dollars a

year_, to be paid in advance.

From the Raleigh Star.

_Southern Literary Messenger_.--"We have received the first number

of the 2d volume of this valuable periodical. This work has justly

acquired a reputation superior to that of any similar publication in

the country, on account both of its elegant typographical execution,

and the rich, valuable, and highly entertaining matter (mostly

original) it contains. In the neatness and beauty of its

typographical appearance, the number before us surpasses any of its

predecessors; and its contents fully sustain its high literary

character. We have no room at present for a particular notice of the

articles. We hope that every Southron, who feels an interest in that

sort of _internal improvement_ in the South, which respects the

mind, will patronize this work."

From the Columbia (Geo.) Times.

_Southern Literary Messenger_.--We have received, some time since,

and wished to have given an earlier notice to, this really excellent

journal; at whose copiousness, variety and goodness of matter, we

were surprized. In literary execution, we think it fully equal to

any Journal of its class, in all the North; and in quantity of

matter, it far exceeds, we believe, any of them. It is also on a

full equality with them, as to its typography.

We are struck, in the _Messenger_, with this good point: the extent

of literary intelligence which it affords, by an unusual number of

critical notices of new publications, is exceedingly well judged.

Its criticisms, too, are in a sounder and more discriminating taste,

than that which infects the Magazines of the North, turning them all

into the mere vehicles of puffery for each man's little set of

associates in scribbling--and partners in literary iniquity. The

Messenger has also this feature, almost indispensable for a

successful Magazine, its Editorial articles are decidedly the best

that it contains. They seem to be almost uniformly good.

We had intended to give some extracts from the Messenger: but the

claims of more pressing matters compel us to postpone them. It is

published in Richmond (Va.) by Thomas W. White, contains 64 large

pages, in double columns, with small type; and is published monthly,

at $5 per annum.

From the National Gazette.

The number of the Southern Literary Messenger for March, has just

made its appearance, having been delayed in order to insert an

excellent address delivered by Professor Dew, of William and Mary

College, upon the influence of the federative republican system of

government upon literature and the developement of character. There

are various articles which may be read with equal pleasure and

profit. A short one upon "Americanisms" alludes to the word _avid_,

employed by Bulwer in his last production, the hero of which is said

to have been avid of personal power: and, the writer thinks it is

the coinage of the novelist, as he says he can find no authority for

it even in the latest dictionaries, nor in any author of repute. It

does not, however, proceed from Mr. Bulwer's mint. As far as we are

aware, Sir Egerton Brydges--who though not a first rate, is no mean

member of the scribbling confraternity--is the {345} first who has

employed it. His Autobiography, published a few years ago, and which

by the way, ought to have been re-published here as one of the most

interesting and singular works of the time, contains it often enough

to prove some feeling towards it in the author's breast akin to that

of paternal affection.

As the review of the book which appeared in the Edinburgh Quarterly,

was attributed to Bulwer, it is very probable that he fell in love

with it when engaged in the task of criticism--a moment when, it

ought to be inferred he was particularly alive to the correctness or

incorrectness of any intrusion upon the premises of the King's

English. The word is unquestionably a good and expressive one, and

has quite as much inherent right to be incorporated with our

language as any other Latin excrescence. It is only "Hebrew roots,"

we are informed by high authority, that "flourish most in barren

ground." No imputation, therefore, rests upon the soil from which

this sprang. Upon the subject of coining words, as upon so many

others, old Flaccus has spoken best:

Licuit, semperque licebit,

Signatum presente notâ procudere nomen.

From the North Carolina Standard.

_The Southern Literary Messenger_.--We have received the March No.

of this valuable monthly. It is as rich in matter, and its pieces

are as varied and interesting as any previous number; and we have

before said, that but few periodicals in the Union, and none _South_

of the Potomac, are superior to it.

From the Washington Sun.

_Southern Literary Messenger_.--We have received the _Southern

Literary Messenger_ for February. Its contents are rich, varied and

interesting. The critiques are particularly good, and evidence a

mind feelingly alive to the literary reputation of our country. The

collection of autographs will be examined with much interest. We can

safely recommend this periodical to the patronage of the public.

From the Tuscaloosa Flag of the Union.

_Southern Literary Messenger_.--We have received the last number of

this beautiful and valuable Magazine, and take great pleasure in

expressing the delight with which we have perused its contents. It

is certainly the best Magazine now published in the Union, and is an

honor to Southern literature and talent. The present number like its

predecessors, is replete with 'pearls, and gems, and flowers,' and

fully sustains the elevated character of the work. The Critical

Notices are peculiarly meritorious and sensible. The Messenger is

now under the editorial guidance of Edgar A. Poe, a gentleman highly

distinguished for his literary taste and talent.

From the Fincastle Democrat.

_Southern Literary Messenger_.--We have been furnished, by the

worthy publisher, with the February number of this "best of American

periodicals," as it is said to be by a distinguished Northern

contemporary. This number is pronounced, in all of the many notices

which we have seen, to be the best of the fifteen that have been

published; of this we are not competent to decide, not having been

favored with the previous numbers; but, be it as it may, we

cheerfully coincide in the annexed sentiment of the editor of the

Pennsylvanian:--"If it is not well supported by our brethren of the

South, no faith is to be placed in their sectional feeling; _it is

vox et præterea nihil_."

From the U. S. Gazette.

The Southern Literary Messenger for March, full of good matter, is

at hand--delayed with a view of giving the whole of Professor Dew's

address. We miss the racy and condemnatory criticism that

distinguishes the work, and which has been favorable to the

production of good books. We who publish no volumes, look with

complacency upon severe criticism.

From the Richmond Compiler.

The writer of the following judicious article, has performed a task

for which he is entitled to our thanks. A want of time and a lack of

the proper talent for criticism, have prevented us from giving our

opinion at length upon the last number of the Messenger; and this

sketch saves us the labor. We accord with most of the writer's

positions, and are pleased with the good sense, moderation and

delicacy with which he has discharged the office of censor.

Criticism, to be useful, must be just and impartial. This is both.

"_The Southern Literary Messenger_."--Virginia has cause of

exultation that her chief literary periodical bearing the above

title, has already attained a respectable rank in the United States,

and has won "golden opinions" from some of the highest dignitaries

in the empire of criticism. Whilst I do not think that the February

number which has just appeared, is superior to all its predecessors,

yet it may be considered a fair specimen of the general ability with

which the work is conducted. Its contents are copious--various in

their style and character, and, in candor be it spoken, of very

unequal merit. Whilst some articles are highly interesting--the

readers of the Messenger would have lost but little, if others had

been omitted. This remark is not made in the spirit of fault

finding; the Messenger has always _enough_ in its pages to admire,

without coveting an indiscriminate and unqualified praise of all

which it contains.

The very first article in the February number, on the importance of

_Selection in Reading_, though short, contains much matter for grave

reflection. The writer states, and states truly, that if a man has

forty years to employ in reading, and reads fifty pages a day, he

will only be able in that period of time, to accomplish about

_sixteen hundred_ volumes of 500 pages each. Highly favored as such

a man would be, beyond the mass of his fellow creatures, how

insignificant the number of volumes read by him, compared with the

millions which fill the libraries of the world, and the thousands

and tens of thousand that continually drop from the press. How

vastly important is it, therefore, to be well directed in the choice

of books!--and I may add, how great is the responsibility of those

whose province it is so to direct; to whom the task has been

confided of selecting our literary food, and of separating what is

healthful and nutritious from what is poisonous and hurtful. A well

established magazine, or periodical, undoubtedly exercises great

influence on the literary taste, as well as the literary morality of

the circle of its readers. Hence good taste, good feeling--just

discrimination and high rectitude, are essential qualities in the

conduction of such a work. That Mr. Poe, the reputed editor of the

Messenger, is a gentleman of brilliant genius and endowments, is a

truth which I believe, will not be controverted by a large majority

of its readers. For one, however, I confess, that there are

occasionally manifested some errors of judgment--or faults in

taste--or whatever they may be called, which I should be glad to see

corrected. I do not think, for example, that such an article as "the

Duc De L'Omelette," in the number under consideration, ought to have

appeared. That kind of writing, I know, may plead high precedents in

its favor; but that it is calculated to produce effects permanently

injurious to sound morals, I think will not be doubted by those who

reflect seriously upon the subject. Mr. Poe is too fond of the

wild--unnatural and horrible! Why will he not permit his fine genius

to soar into purer, brighter, and happier regions? Why will he not

disenthral himself from the spells of German enchantment and

supernatural imagery? There is room enough for the exercise of the

highest powers, upon the multiform relations of human life, without

descending into the dark mysterious and unutterable creations of

licentious fancy. When Mr. Poe passes from the region of shadows,

into the plain practical dissecting room of criticism, he manifests

great dexterity and power. He exposes the imbecility and rottenness

of our _ad captandum_ popular literature, with the hand of a master.

The public I believe was much delighted with the admirable scalping

of "Norman Leslie," in the December number, and likewise of Mr.

Simms' "Partisan," in the number for January; and it will be no less

pleased at the caustic severity with which the puerile abortion of

"Paul Ulric" is exposed in the present number.--These miserable

attempts at fiction, will bring all fictitious writing into utter

disrepute, unless indeed the stern rebukes which shall come from our

chairs of criticism, shall rectify the public taste, and preserve

the purity of public feeling.

It would be tedious to pronounce upon the merits and demerits of the

several articles in the number under review. Dr. Greenhow's

continuation of the Tripolitan Sketches is worthy of his calm and

philosophical pen. The re-appearance of "Nugator" in the pages of

the Messenger--after a long interval of silence--will be hailed by

its readers with great pleasure; his "Castellanus" is excellent. The

article on "Liberian Literature," will attract much attention. It

presents a very vivid picture of the wonderful progress which that

colony has made in most of the arts, and in many of the refinements

of life. Lionel Granby--the sketch of the lamented Cushing,--and the

sketches of Lake Superior, have each their peculiar merits, and will

be read with interest; of the _Critical Notices_, the sarcastic

power of the review of Paul Ulric, has been already spoken of. The

Review of "Rienzi," too, the last novel of Bulwer, is written in Mr.

Poe's best style,--but I must be permitted to dissent _toto cælo_

from his opinion, that the author of that work is unsurpassed as a

novelist by any writer living or dead.--There is no disputing about

tastes, but according to my poor judgment, a single work might be

selected from among the voluminous labors of Walter Scott, worth all

that Bulwer has ever written, or ever will write--and this I {346}

believe will be the impartial verdict of posterity, at least so long

as unaffected simplicity and the true moral sublime, are preferred

to the gaudy and meretricious coloring which perverted genius throws

around its creations. The Eulogy on the great and good Marshall, is

an elaborate and elegant performance. It is a powerful, yet familiar

sketch of the principal features in the life and character of that

incomparable man. The notices of Emilia Harrington; Lieutenant

Slidell's work, the _American in England_; _Conti_; the _Noble Deeds

of Women_; of _Roget's Physiology_, (one of the Bridgewater

Treatises) and of Mathew Carey's _Auto-Biography_--are all very

spirited articles, and are greatly superior to papers of the same

description in the very best monthly periodicals of our country. The

last article "Autography" is not exactly to my taste, though there

are doubtless many who would find in it food for merriment. The

writer of "Readings with My Pencil, No. 1,"--contests the generally

received maxim of Horace, that poets are born such; in other words,

he denies that there is an "original, inherent organization" of the

mind which leads to the "high Heaven of invention," or which,

according to the phrenologists, confers the faculty of "ideality."

It would require too much space to prove that Horace was right, and

that his assailant is altogether wrong. Mr. J. F. O. is greatly

behind the philosophy of the age. It is too late in the day to prove

that Shakespeare and Byron were created exactly equal with the

common mass of mankind, and that _circumstances_ made them superior.

Circumstances may excite and _develope_ mental power, but cannot

create it. Napoleon, although not born Emperor of the French, was

originally endowed with that great capacity which fitted him to

tread the paths of military glory and to cut out his way to supreme

power. Ordinary mortals could not have achieved what he did, with

circumstances equally favorable, or with an education far superior.

It is gratifying to learn that the "Messenger" is still extending

the circle of its readers. The wonder is,--supposing that we have

some love of country left on this side of the Potomac,--that its

patronage is not overflowing. It is the only respectable periodical,

I believe, south of that river; and with due encouragement, it might

not only become a potent reformer of literary taste, but the vehicle

of grave and solid instruction upon subjects deeply interesting to

the southern country. That with all our never-ending professions of

patriotism, however, there exists a vast deal more of selfishness

than public spirit, even in our sunny clime, is a lamentable

truth,--nor for one, am I sufficiently sanguine to unite with the

editor of the Messenger, in the answer which he gives to his own

interrogatory in the following eloquent passage, extracted from the

Review of "Conti;"--"How long shall mind succumb to the grossest

materiality? How long shall the veriest vermin of the earth who

crawl around the altar of Mammon be more esteemed of men, than they,

the gifted ministers to those exalted emotions which link us with

the mysteries of Heaven? To our own query we may venture a reply.

Not long--not long will such rank injustice be committed, or

permitted. A spirit is already abroad at war with it. And in every

billow of the unceasing sea of change--and in every breath, however

gentle, of the wide atmosphere of revolution encircling us, is that

spirit steadily, yet irresistibly at work." Alas! for this sea of

change and this atmosphere of revolution which are fast surrounding

us! For my part, I fear that all other distinctions but _wealth_ and

_power_ are about to be annihilated. What do we behold indeed in

society, but one universal struggle to acquire both? Moral and

intellectual worth are but lightly esteemed in comparison with the

possession of that sordid dross, which every brainless upstart or

every corrupt adventurer may acquire.

Though the Muses occupy a small space in the present number of the

Messenger, their claims are not to be disregarded. Miss Draper's

"Lay of Ruin," and Mr. Flint's "Living Alone" have both decided

merit. The "Ballad" is written by one who can evidently write much

better, if he chooses; and there is a deep poetical inspiration

about Mr. Poe's "Valley Nis," which would be more attractive if his

verses were smoother, and his subject matter less obscure and

unintelligible. Mr. Poe will not consent to abide with ordinary

mortals.

Upon the whole, the last number of the Messenger is one of decided

merit.

X. Y. Z.

From the Richmond Compiler.

_The Southern Literary Messenger_. Our critical correspondent of the

22d, is not borne out, in some of his remarks, by public opinion. We

allude to his observations on the _Duc de L'Omelette_, and Mr. Poe's

_Autography_. These articles are eliciting the highest praise from

the highest quarters. Of the Duc de L'Omelette, the Baltimore

American, (a paper of the first authority and hitherto opposed to

Mr. P.) says: "The Duc de L'Omelette, by Edgar A. Poe, is one of

those light, spirited, fantastic inventions, of which we have had

specimens before in the Messenger, betokening a fertility of

imagination, and power of execution, that would, under a sustained

effort, produce creations of an enduring character." The Petersburg

Constellation copies the entire "_Autography_," with high

commendations, and of the Duc de L'Omelette, says, "of the lighter

contributions, of the diamonds which sparkle beside the more sombre

gems, commend us, thou spirit of eccentricity! to our favorite,

Edgar A. Poe's '_Duc de L'Omelette_,' the best thing of the kind we

ever have, or ever expect to read." These opinions seem to be

universal. In justice to Mr. Poe, and as an offsett to the remarks

of our correspondent, we extract the following notice of the

February number from the National Intelligencer.

From the National Intelligencer.

_The Southern Literary Messenger_. The February No. of this

beautiful and interesting periodical has reached us, and it gives us

pleasure to learn that it will be distributed to a greater number of

subscribers than any previous one has been. This is creditable to

the taste of the people, to the industry of the proprietor, the

talents of its editor and contributors, and particularly to the

South, to whom Mr. White especially looks for the support of his

enterprise. The following notice of the contents of the present

number is from a friend of literary taste and discrimination:

The present number is uncommonly rich. It opens with some valuable

hints upon the necessity of selection in reading, a capital

discourse of a column and a half upon the startling text, "if you

have forty years to employ in reading, and can read fifty pages a

day, you will be able in those forty years to accomplish only about

_sixteen hundred volumes_, of 500 pages each." This consideration,

ably put by the editor, is an antidote, one would think, to

"smattering." The next is No. X. of a very interesting series of

Historical sketches of Barbary States. This number brings the

history of Algiers down to the close of Charles Xth's reign. Taken

together, these papers are very valuable, and will form a useful

reference hereafter. It is such papers as these that make a

periodical worth keeping. The next prose article is amusing. It is a

translation from the French, and gives a most humorous account of "a

Cousin of the Married," a man who acquired that quaint _sobriquet_

by attending all weddings, where there was a large company assembled

and making himself useful by proposing sentiments, reciting

_epithalamia_, and singing songs appropriate to those happy

occasions, until he was discovered by an aristocratic groom, and

compelled to vacate the premises. The paper contains a similar

narrative of "a Cousin of the Dead," who, having been advised to

ride for his health, and being too poor, used to go to all funerals

as a mourner, and thus obtained the medicine prescribed by his

physician, with no other cost than a few crocodile tears. Then comes

one of that eccentric writer, _Edgar A. Poe's_, characteristic

productions, "_The Duc de L'Omelette_," which is one of the best

things of the kind we have ever read. _Mr. Poe_ has great powers,

and every line _tells_ in all he writes. He is no spinner-out of

long yarns, but chooses his subject, whimsically, perhaps, yet

originally, and treats it in a manner peculiarly his own. "Rustic

Courtship in New England" has not the verisimilitude which is

necessary to entitle it to the only praise that such sketches

usually obtain; unless they were well done, it were always better

that Yankee stories be not done at all. We hate to be over-critical,

but would recommend to the "_Octogenarian_" to take the veritable

_Jack Downing_ or _John Beedle_, as his models, before he writes

again. Those inimitable writers have well-nigh, if not quite,

exhausted the subject of New England Courtship, and (we speak "as

one having authority, and not as the scribes," by which we mean the

critics) the writer before us has done but very indifferently what

they have done so well, as to gain universal applause. "Palæstine"

is a useful article, containing geographical, topographical, and

other statistical facts in the history of that interesting county,

well put together, and valuable as a reference.

We were much entertained with "_Nugator's_" humorous sketches of the

castle-building farmer. No periodical in the country, numbers one

among its contributors more racy than "Nugator." The article on

"Liberian Literature" gives the reader a very flattering idea of the

condition of that colony. The "Biographical Sketch" of _President

Cushing_, of Hampden Sidney College, we read with much pleasure. We

would recommend a series of similar sketches, from the same hand:

nothing can give a periodical of this kind more solid value than

such tributes to departed worth. Sketches of "Lake

Superior"--beautiful! beautiful! We feel inclined to follow the

track so picturesquely described by _Mr. Woolsey_, and make a

pilgrimage to the wild and woody scenery of the Great Lake. This is

a continuous series of letters, and we shall hail the coming numbers

with much pleasure. The last prose _contribution_ in the book is

entitled "Readings with my Pencil," being a series of paraphrases of

different passages, taken at random, from various authors. We like

this plan, and think well of the performance thus far. It is to be

continued.

The poetical department is not so rich as that in former numbers.

_Miss Draper's_ "Lay of Ruin" is irregular in the versification, and

shows the fair writer's forte to be in a different style altogether.

We wish she would give us something more like that gem of the

December number of the Messenger, "Halley's Comet in 1760." _Mr.

Flint's_ "Living Alone," capital; and _Mr. Poe's_ "Valley Nis,"

characteristically wild, yet sweetly soft and smooth in measure as

in mood. The "Lines" on page 166 do no credit to the Messenger; they

should have been dropped into the fire as soon as the first stanza

was read by the editor; and if he had gotten to the eleventh, he

should have sent the MS. to the Museum as a curiosity. Look! The

Bard addresses the Mississippi!

"'Tis not clearness--'tis not brightness

Such as dwell in mountain brooks--

'Tis thy big, big boiling torrent--

'Tis thy wild and angry looks."

This is altogether too bad. _Eliza's_ Stanzas to "Greece" are very

beautiful. She writes from _Maine_, and, with care and cultivation,

will, by and by, do something worthy of the name to which she makes

aspiration. So much for the poetry of the {347} number; which

neither in quantity or quality is equal to the last three or four.

In the "Editorial" department, we recognise the powerful

discrimination of _Mr. Poe_. The dissection of "Paul Ulric," though

well deserved, is perfectly savage. _Morris Mattson, Esq._ will

hardly write again. This article will as surely kill him as one not

half so scalpingly written did poor _Keats_, in the London

Quarterly. The notice of _Lieutenant Slidell's_ "American in

England" we were glad to see. It is a fair offset to the coxcombical

article (probably written by _Norman Leslie Fay_) which lately

appeared in the New York Mirror, in reference to our countryman's

really agreeable work. _Bulwer's_ "Rienzi" is ably reviewed, and in

a style to beget in him who reads it a strong desire to possess

himself immediately of the book itself. There is also an interesting

notice of _Matthew Carey's_ Autobiography, and two or three other

works lately published.

Under this head, there is, in the number before us, the best sketch

of the character and life of _Chief Justice Marshall_ we have as yet

seen. This alone would make a volume of the Messenger valuable

beyond the terms of subscription. It purports to be a Review of

_Story's_, _Binney's_, and _Snowden's_ Eulogies upon that

distinguished jurist, while, in reality, it is a rich and pregnant

Biography of "The Expounder of the Constitution."

The number closes with a most amusing paper containing twenty-five

admirably executed _fac simile_ autographs of some of the most

distinguished of our literati. The _equivoque_ of _Mr. Joseph A. B.

C. D. E. F. G._ &c. _Miller_ is admirably kept up, and the whimsical

character of the pretended letters to which the signatures are

attached is well preserved. Of almost all the autographs we can

speak on our own authority, and are able to pronounce them capital.

Upon the whole, the number before us (entirely original) may be set

down as one of the very best that has yet been issued.

From the Pennsylvanian.

The Southern Literary Messenger, published in Richmond, maintains

its high character. The March number, however, which has just come

to hand, would have been the better had the solid articles been

relieved, as in the previous numbers, by a greater variety of

contributions of a lighter cast. It is comparatively heavy, a fault

which should be carefully avoided in a magazine intended for all

sorts of readers. Sinning in the opposite direction would be much

more excusable.

From the Georgetown Metropolitan.

We have taken time to go through the last number of the Southern

Literary Messenger, and find it, with some slight exceptions, in the

articles of its correspondents, worthy, in every respect, of the

high reputation of the series. The editorial articles are vigorous

and original, as usual, and there are papers not easily to be

surpassed in any periodical. Such a one is that on the Classics,

which is not the saucy and flippant thing we were half afraid to

find it, but an essay of great wisdom, learning, and strength,--and

what we generally see combined with it,--playfulness of mind.

Another such article is the splendid address prepared by Professor

Dew, for delivery before the Historical and Philosophical Society of

Virginia. Its eloquence, vast compass, and subtlety of thought, will

amply and richly repay the attention.

We have time to-day for but a brief notice of the other articles.

Sketches of the Barbary States,--continues the description of the

French conquest, with the same clearness and ability which we have

before frequently commended.

"Epimanes" displays a rich, but extravagant fancy.

"To Helen," is pretty and classic, from the same hand--we will give

it in our next.

"Change" has many lines in it, of sweet, and what we like best, of

thoughtful poetry; we will publish it in our next.

"Manual Labor Schools."--Another "address," but practical and

sensible. We suggest, with deference, to the very able editor of the

Southern Literary Messenger, that the less frequently he admits

articles of this description into his columns, the better. Except in

rare circumstances, such for example as Professor Dew's, we think

they are unfit for a magazine,--the subject of the present one, is,

however, of great importance. "Georgia Scenes" makes a capital

article, and has excited, in our mind, a great curiosity to see the

book.

From the Georgetown Metropolitan.

The Southern Literary Messenger, for the present month, is unusually

rich. The articles evince depth, talent and taste, and there is all

the eastern vigor and maturity of learning, with all the southern

spirit of imagination. It is, in fact, nobly edited and supported,

well worthy of being considered the representative and organ of

Southern talent.

Of the articles in the present number, the general list as may be

seen by looking at the advertisement in another column, is very

attractive, and a perusal will not "unbeseem the promise." We have

not time to go over each as we would wish; but the historical sketch

of Algiers, which is brought down to the embarkation of the French

expedition, will command attention. "A _Lay of Ruin_," by Miss

Draper, has some lines of exquisite poetry, and Edgar A. Poe's

Sketch "The Duc de L'Omelette," is the best thing of the kind we

have seen from him yet. "Living Alone" by Timothy Flint, greatly

interested us. That this patriarch of American literature, in his

green and fresh old age, can write verses so full of the amaranthine

vigor of youth, is a delightful picture. We are sorry we cannot find

room for these pleasant verses. Among other attractions of the

number, we come upon a Drinking Song, by Major Noah, in which the

most agreeable and witty of editors, proves himself one of the most

moral and fascinating of lyrists. It is an anacreontic of the right

stamp, and does its author more credit than all the anti-Van Buren

articles he ever penned.

The Critical Notices are better by far, than those in any other

magazine in the country. Paul Ulric is too small game for the

tremendous demolition he has received--a club of iron has been used

to smash a fly. The article on Judge Marshall is an able and

faithful epitome of that great jurist's character; in fact, the best

which the press has yet given to the public. We agree with all the

other critiques except that of Bulwer's Rienzi. The most

extraordinary article in the book and the one which will excite most

attention, is its tail piece, in which an American edition of

Frazer's celebrated Miller hoax has been played off on the American

Literati with great success--and better than all, an accurate fac

simile of each autograph given along with it.

This article is extremely amusing, and will excite more attention

than probably any thing of the kind yet published in an American

periodical. It is quite new in this part of the world.

We commend this excellent magazine to our readers, as in a high

degree deserving of encouragement, and as one which will reward it.

From the Baltimore American.

The _Southern Literary Messenger_ for February is, we think, the

best of the fifteen numbers that have been published. Most of its

articles, prose and verse, are of good Magazine quality, sprightly

and diversified. The first, on "Selection in Reading," contains in a

brief space a useful lesson in these book-abounding times, when many

people take whatever publishers please to give them, or surrender

their right of selection to the self-complacent and shallow editors

of cheap "Libraries." Of the interesting "Sketches of the History

and present condition of Tripoli, with some account of the other

Barbary States," we have here No. 10, which concludes with the

preparations of the attack on Algiers by the French in 1830. "The

Cousin of the Married" and the "Cousin of the Dead" are two capital

comic pictures from the French. "The Duc de L'Omelette, by Edgar A.

Poe" is one of those light, spirited, fantastic inventions, of which

we have had specimens before in the Messenger, betokening a

fertility of imagination and power of execution, that with

discipline could, under a sustained effort, produce creations of an

enduring character. "Rustic Courtship in New England" is of a class

that should not get higher than the first page of a country

newspaper,--we mean no disrespect to any of our

"cotemporaries,"--for it has no literary capabilities.

The best and also the largest portion of the present number of the

Messenger is the department of critical notices of books. These are

the work of a vigorous, sportive, keen pen, that, whether you

approve the judgments or not it records, takes captive your

attention by the spirit with which it moves. The number ends with

the amusing Miller correspondence, of which we have already spoken.

From the Petersburg Constellation.

We briefly announced a few days ago, the receipt of the February

number of the _Southern Literary Messenger_. It is one of the

richest and raciest numbers of that Journal yet issued from the

Press. The judicious introductory article on the necessity of select

reading; the continuation of the Historical sketches of the Barbary

States; Palæstine; the Biographical notice of the late Professor

Cushing of Hampden Sidney College; the Review of the Eulogies on,

and Reminiscenses of the late Chief Justice Marshall, are among the

solid treasures of the Messenger of this month. Sketches of Lake

Superior in a series of Letters which are "_to be continued_;" the

Cousin of the Married and the Cousin of the Dead, a translation from

the French; Lionel Granby, Chapter 8; the Castle Builder turned

Farmer, and Rustic Courtship in New England, have each their

beauties, excellences and peculiarities. Of the lighter

contributions, of the diamonds which sparkle beside the more sombre

gems, commend us, thou spirit of eccentricity! forever and a day to

our favorite Edgar A. Poe's _Duc de L'Omelette_--the best thing of

the kind we ever have or ever expect to read. The idea of "dying of

an Ortolan;" the waking up in the palace of Pluto; of that

mysterious chain of "blood red metal" hung "_ parmi les nues_," at

the nether extremity of which was attached a "cresset," pouring

forth a light more "intense, still and terrible" than "Persia ever

worshipped, Gheber imagined, or Mussulman dreamed of;" the paintings

and statuary of that mysterious hall, whose solitary uncurtained

window looked upon blazing Tartarus, and whose ceiling was lost in a

mass of "fiery-colored clouds;" the _nonchalance_ of the _Duc_ in

challenging "His Majesty" to a _pass_ with the _points_; his

imperturbable, self-confident assurance during the playing of a game

of _ecarté_; his adroitness in slipping a card while his Infernal

Highness "took wine" (a trick which won the _Duc_ his game by the

by,) and finally his _characteristic_ compliment to the Deity of the

Place of "que s'il n'etait pas de L'Omelette, il n'aurait point

d'objection d'etre le Diable," are conceptions which for peculiar

eccentricity and graphic quaintness, are perfectly inimitable. Of

the criticisms, the most are good; that on Mr. Morris Mattson's

novel of "Paul Ulric," like a former criticism from the same pen on

Fay's "Norman Leslie" is a literal "flaying alive!" a carving up

into "ten thousand atoms!" a complete literary annihilation! If Mr.

Morris {348} Mattson is either courageous or wise, he will turn upon

his merciless assailant as Byron turned upon Jeffrey, and prove that

he can not only do better things, but that he deserves more lenient

usage! Last but not by far the least in interest, is Mr. Joseph A.

Q. Z. Miller's "Autography." We copy the whole article as a literary

treat which we should wrong their tastes did we suppose for a moment

would not be as highly appreciated by each and all of our readers,

as it is by ourself.

From the Baltimore Chronicle.

_The Southern Literary Messenger_. The last number of this

periodical is, perhaps the best that has appeared, and shows that

the favor with which its predecessors have been received has only

added stimulus to the exertions of its enterprising proprietor and

very able Editor. The number consists of 70 pages, all of which are

taken up with original matter. The prose articles are generally of

high merit--but the poetry of the present number is inferior to that

of some of the preceding. The critical notices are written in a

nervous style and with great impartiality and independence. The

Editor seems to have borne in mind the maxim of the greatest of

reviewers--"the judge is condemned when the guilty is acquitted."

The application of this severe rule to all criticism would impart

greater value to just commendation and render the censure of the

press more formidable to brainless pretenders. The public judgment

is constantly deluded and misled by indiscriminate puffing and

unmerited praise. The present Editor of the Messenger is in no

danger of doing violence to his feelings in this respect.

From the Boston Mercantile Journal.

_The Southern Literary Messenger_.--This is a periodical which it is

probably well known to many of our readers, was established a little

more than a year since, in Richmond, Va. It is issued in monthly

numbers of about seventy pages each, and is devoted to every

department of Literature and the Fine Arts. Containing much matter

of a brilliant and superior order, evidently the productions of

accomplished scholars and Belles Lettres writers, with able and

discriminating critical notices of the principal publications on

this side the Atlantic, the Southern Literary Messenger is equal in

interest and excellence to any Monthly Periodical in the country,

and we are glad to learn from the February number that it has

already received extensive and solid patronage.

From the Norfolk Beacon.

_The Southern Literary Messenger_ for February appears in all its

freshness. The sketches of the history of the Barbary States

contained in the present number include the period of the equipment

and departure of the French fleet destined for the attack on

Algiers. The account of the diplomatic movements of England and

France on the subject of the proposed capture is novel and

instructive. The tribute to the memory of Cushing we hail with

pleasure. If it be not a faultless production, it is written in a

right spirit. The review of Paul Ulric is written with great freedom

and unusual severity. The reviewer wields a formidable weapon. The

article on Judge Marshall groups within a small compass much

valuable and interesting intelligence respecting the late Chief

Justice. It is not executed, however in a workmanlike manner. The

ungenerous allusion to Chapman Johnson was wholly gratuitous. There

is also a seasoning of federal politics, not referring to long past

times, that ought to have been spared us. But the article on

Autography is a treat of no common order. We have seen nothing of

the kind before in an American periodical. It must have cost Mr.

White a great deal of labor and expense in its typographical

execution. What has become of the excellent series of essays on the

sexes, ascribed to the pen of a distinguished professor of Wm. &

Mary?

From the Baltimore American.

The publication of the Southern Literary Messenger, for March, was

delayed beyond the usual time, for the purpose of inserting in it an

Address by Professor Dew, of Wm. and Mary College, prepared to be

delivered before the Virginia Historical and Philosophical Society.

The first copy sent to us having miscarried, we have been further

disappointed in the receipt of this number, which has just now

reached us. As yet we have read but one article in it, but that is

one of such merit on so interesting a subject, that it were nearly

sufficient alone to give value to the number, without the aid of Mr.

Dew's Address, to which we shall hereafter refer, doubting not to

find it of high excellence, as his reputation leads us to

anticipate.

The article to which we allude is on 'Manual Labor Schools, and

their importance as connected with literary institutions.' The

introduction of manual labor as a regular department of the school

exercises is, we believe, one of the greatest improvements of the

age, in the most important branch of human endeavor--the _culture_

of man. We make no apology for frequently recurring to this subject.

As reasonable would it be to expect apologies from the municipal

authorities for directing their efforts daily, and with unrelaxed

watchfulness, to the keeping pure and healthy the atmosphere of a

city. The culture or education of human beings is a subject of

unsurpassed moment and of never ceasing interest. The principles

upon which this culture is to be conducted, and the modes of

applying them, involve the well being of communities and nations. We

are glad therefore, to perceive, that in our new and promising race

of literary monthlies, education receives a large share of

attention.

The paper before us in the Messenger, prepared by the Rev. Mr.

Stanton, is peculiarly interesting, because it embodies a quantity

of experience of the results produced by manual labor--results,

which though derived from comparatively few sources, the number of

institutions where the system has been introduced being as yet

small--are of the most emphatic and convincing character. They

already suffice to prove that the connexion of manual labor

establishments with literary institutions, is conducive not only in

the highest degree to health, but to morals, and to intellectual

proficiency. Moreover--and this is a point of incalculable

importance--in some of these institutions, a _majority_ of the

students have by their labor diminished their expenses about one

half; a portion of them have defrayed the whole of their expenses,

and a few have more than defrayed them--enjoying at the same time

better health, and making more rapid advances in knowledge than

usual. The distinct testimony of the pupils as well as

superintendents, is adduced to prove the beneficial effects upon

body and mind, of three hours agricultural or mechanical labor every

day. One of these effects is described in the following language.

"This system is calculated to make men hardy, enterprising, and

independent; and to wake up within them a spirit perseveringly to

do, and endure, and dare."

From the New Yorker.

_The Southern Literary Messenger_.--The February No. of this

periodical is before us--rich in typographical beauty as ever, but

scarcely so fortunate as in some former instances in the character

of its original contributions. Such at least is our judgment; and

yet of some twenty articles the greater number will be perused with

decided satisfaction. Of these, No. X. of the "_Sketches of the

History of Tripoli_" and other Barbary States, affords an

interesting account of the series of outrages on the part of the

Algerine Regency which provoked the entire overthrow of that

infamous banditti and the subjugation of the country. [We take

occasion to say here that we trust France will _never_ restore the

Algerine territory to the sway of the barbarian and infidel, but

hold it at the expense, if need be, of a Continental War.]

"_The Cousin of the Married and the Cousin of the Dead_" is a most

striking translation, which we propose to copy.

"_Living Alone_," by Timothy Flint, forms an exception to the usual

character of the poetry of the Messenger, which we do not greatly

affect. Mr. Flint, however, writes to be read--and is rarely

disappointed or disappoints his readers.

There are some amusing pictures of Virginia rural life and domestic

economy in the papers entitled "Lionel Granby" and "Castellanus;"

and the biographical sketch of the late President Cushing, of

Hampden Sidney College, indicates a just State pride properly

directed. The "Sketches of Lake Superior" are alike creditable to

the writer and the Magazine. "Greece" forms the inspiration of some

graceful lines. But the 'great feature' of this No. is an Editorial

critique on Mr. Morris Mattson's novel of "Paul Ulric," which is

tomahawked and scalped after the manner of a Winnebago. If any young

gentleman shall find himself irresistibly impelled to perpetrate a

novel, and all milder remedies prove unavailing, we earnestly advise

him to read this criticism. We are not sufficiently hard hearted to

recommend its perusal to any one else.

The concluding paper will commend itself to the attention of the

rational curious. It embraces the autographs, quaintly introduced

and oddly accompanied, of twenty-four of the most distinguished

literary personages of our country--Mrs. Sigourney, Miss Leslie,

Miss Sedgwick, Messrs. Washington Irving, Fitz Greene Halleck,

Timothy Flint, J. K. Paulding, J. Fenimore Cooper, Robert Walsh,

Edward Everett, J. Q. Adams, Dr. Channing, &c. &c. We note this as

an evidence of the energy no less than the good taste of the

publisher, and as an earnest of his determination to spare no pains

or expense in rendering the work acceptable to its patrons.

From the New York Evening Star.

The Southern Literary Messenger, for March, has been received, and a

particularly good number it is. There is one point in which this

Messenger stands pre-eminent, and that point is candor. If there is

any thing disgusting and sickening, it is the fashion of magazine

and newspaper reviewers of the present day of plastering every thing

which is heralded into existence with a tremendous sound of

trumpets--applaud every thing written by the twenty-fifth relation

distant of a really great writer, or the author of one or two

passable snatches of poetry, or every day sketches.

From the Natchez Courier.

Last but not least, as the friends of a literature, emphatically

_southern_, we welcome the February number of the "Southern Literary

Messenger," a work that stands second to none in the country. Its

criticisms we pronounce to be at once the boldest and most generally

correct of any we meet with. True, it is very severe on many of the

current publications of the day; but we think no unprejudiced man

can say it is a whit too much so. The country is deluged from Maine

to Louisiana, with a mass of _stuff_ "done up" into _books_ that

_require_ the most severe handling. The Messenger _gives it to

them_. It is a work which ought to be in the hand of every literary

_southerner_, in particular. It is published by _T. W. White

Richmond, Va._

The southern literary messenger, Vol. II., No. 5, April, 1836 · 第 7 / 7 章