PENDANTS.

It would probably be vain to attempt to determine how pendant ornaments

first came into use, whether from some utilitarian practice or through

some superstitious notion. It matters not, however, whether the first

pendant was an implement, a utensil, or a fetichitic talisman; it has

developed by slow stages into an ornament upon which has been lavished

the best efforts of culture and skill. The simple gorget of shell

suspended upon the naked breast of the preadamite is the prototype of

many a costly jewel and many a princely decoration. With the American

savage it was a guardian spirit, invested with the mystery and the power

of the sea, and among the more cultured tribes became in time the

receptacle of the most ambitious efforts of a phenomenal art. The

important place the gorget has taken in ornament and as a means of

displaying personal aggrandizement has made it a most powerful agent in

the evolution of the arts of taste.

As a rule the larger and more important pendants are employed as

gorgets, but vast numbers of the smaller specimens are strung with beads

at intervals along the strings, attached as auxiliary pendants to the

larger gorgets, suspended from the nose, ears, and wrists, or form

tinkling borders to head-dresses and garments. These pendants consist

either of entire shells, or of parts of shells, pierced or grooved to

facilitate suspension. The purely artificial forms are infinitely

varied. The character of the shell, however, has much to do with the

form of the finished ornaments, deciding their thickness and often their

outline. In size they range from extremely minute forms to plates six or

more inches in diameter. The perforations, in position and number, are

greatly varied, but as a rule the larger discoidal pendants will be

found to have two marginal perforations for suspension.

These nicely-polished shell-disks afforded tempting tablets for the

primitive artist, and retain many specimens of his work as an engraver.

The engraved specimens, however, should be treated separately, according

to the class of design which they contain. Plain pendants need but a

brief notice, and may be treated together as one group, with such

subdivisions only as may be suggested by their form, their derivation,

or their geographical distribution.

_Plain pendants._--It will be unnecessary to cite authorities to show

that our ancient peoples were fond of pendant ornaments, and wore them

without stint, but to illustrate the manner in which they were used and

the methods of combining them with other articles of jewelry in

necklaces, bracelets, &c., I shall refer briefly to the literature of

the period of American discovery.

The inhabitants of Mexico are said to have been very simple in the

matter of dress, but displayed much vanity in their profuse employment

of personal ornament. Besides feathers and jewels, with which they

adorned their clothes, they wore pendants to the ears, nose, and lips,

as well as necklaces, bracelets, and anklets. The ear ornaments of the

poor were shells, pieces of crystal, amber, and other brilliant stones,

but the rich wore pearls, emeralds, amethysts, or other gems, set in

gold.[122] The priestly personages so graphically delineated in the

ancient Aztec manuscripts are as a rule loaded down with pendant

ornaments. In traveling north along the west coast of Mexico the Friar

Niza encountered Indians who wore many large shells of mother of pearl

about their necks, and farther up toward Cibola the inhabitants wore

pearl shells upon their foreheads;[123] and Cabeça de Vaca when among

the pueblos of New Mexico noticed beads and corals that came from the

"South Sea." Ornaments made from marine shells are found in many of the

ancient ruins to-day. They are also highly valued by the modern Indians

of this region.

In the earliest accounts of the Indians of the Atlantic coast we find

frequent mention of the use of pendants and gorgets, and the manner of

wearing them as ornaments. Beverly, after having described beads made of

a shell resembling the English buglas, says that they also make

"runtees" of the same shell, and grind them as smooth as peak. "These

are either large like an oval Bead, drill'd the length of the Oval, or

else they are circular and flat, almost an Inch over, and one Third of

an Inch thick, and drill'd edgeways. Of this Shell they also make round

Tablets of about four Inches Diameter, which they polish as smooth as

the other, and sometimes they etch or grave thereon Circles, Stars, a

half Moon, or any other Figure suitable to their Fancy. These they wear

instead of Medals before or behind their Neck, and use the _Peak_,

_Runtees_, and _Pipes_ for Coronets, Bracelets, Belts, or long Strings

hanging down before the Breast, or else they lace their Garments with

them, and adorn their _Tomahawks_, and every other thing that they

value."[124] The "Pipes" here spoken of were probably long, heavy

cylindrical beads.

In referring to this class of ornaments, Lafitau says: "The collars

which the savages sometimes wear around the neck are about a foot in

diameter, and are not different from those which one now sees on some

antiques, on the necks of statues of barbarians. The northern savages

wear on the breast a plate of hollow shell, as long as the hand, which

has the same effect as that which was called _Bulla_ among the

Romans."[125]

Wood, speaking of the Indians of Northern New England, in 1634, says:

"Although they be thus poore, yet is there in them the sparkes of

naturall pride, which appeares in their longing desire after many kinds

of ornaments, wearing pendants in their eares, as formes of birds,

beasts, and fishes carved out of bone, shels, and stone, with long

bracelets of their curious wampompeag and mowhackees, which they put

about their necks and loynes."[126]

Kalm says of the Indians of Lorette, near Quebec, Canada, that "round

their necks they have a string of violet wampums, with little white

wampums between them. These wampums are small, of the figure of oblong

pearls, and made of the shells which the _English_ call clams. At the

end of the wampum strings many of the _Indians_ wear a large French

silver coin, with the king's effigy, on their breasts; others have a

large shell on the breast, of a fine white colour, which they value very

high, and is very dear; others, again, have no ornament at all round the

neck."[127]

Pendants of metal and medals of European manufacture soon replaced in a

great measure the primitive gorgets of shell; and early in the history

of the tribes a heterogeneous collection of native beads, silver

crosses, and traders' medals, ornamented the breasts of the simple

savages.

In studying the habits and customs of our native peoples we look with a

great deal of interest upon the earliest historical records, but

generally find it prudent to remember that the "personal equation" was

unusually large in those days, and in studying the illustrations given

in the works of early writers we must make due allowance for the

well-known tendency to exaggerate as well as for the fact that the

artist has more frequently drawn from descriptions than from sketches

made on the spot.

In Plate XLV two examples are given which seem to me to be trustworthy,

as they agree with the descriptions given, and are in a general way

characteristic of the American aborigines. Fig. 1 is reproduced,

original size, from Plate 2, Volume II, of Lafitau, and shows a broad

necklace ornamented with figures that resemble arrow heads. From this,

by means of a cord, is suspended a large circular disk with concave

front, which undoubtedly represents a shell gorget. In front of this and

suspended from the necklace are two long strands of beads of various

sizes and shapes, which give completeness to a very tasteful ornament.

In the same plate is a pretty fair drawing of a native in costume. He is

represented wearing a necklace similar to the one just described. An

enlarged drawing of this ornament is given in Fig. 2. In Fig. 3 I

reproduce a necklace from a plate in De Bry, which consists of a string

of beads with two large disks that look more like metal than shell. A

similar ornament is shown in Fig. 4, but with figured disks and

secondary pendants. It is copied from the Codex of the Vatican. A common

form of necklace among the ancient Aztecs consisted of small univalve

shells suspended from a string. One of these, with other pendants, is

shown in Fig. 5. It is also copied from the Vatican Codex. Others of a

much more complex nature may be found in the same manuscript. Of even

greater interest are the beautiful necklaces, with their pendants, found

in the sculptures of Mexico and Yucatan.[128] Three of these are shown

in Figs. 6, 7, and 8. One has a disk with human features engraved upon

it, another has a cross with equal arms, and another a T-shaped cross.

All have more or less auxiliary ornamentation. In Fig. 9 I present a

bracelet of beads and pendants from Peru which illustrates one of the

simpler uses of pendants. I have not learned whether the parts of this

ornament were originally arranged as given in the cut or not; the

original stringing may have been somewhat different. The beads are

mostly of shell, and are of a variety of colors, white, red, yellow, and

gray. The discoidal and cylindrical forms are both represented. The

former range from one-eighth to three-eighths of an inch in diameter;

the latter are one-eighth of an inch in thickness and three-eighths in

length. The larger pendants, made of whitish shell, are carved to

represent some life form, probably a bird; a large perforation near the

upper end passes through the head, two oblique notches with deep lines

at the sides, define the wings, and a series of notches at the wide end

represent the tail. Two smaller pendants are still simpler in form,

while another, with two nearly central perforations and notched edges,

resembles a button.

[Illustration: PL. XLV--ANCIENT PENDANTS.

1, 2. Necklaces, from Lafitau.

3. From De Bry.

4, 5. From Mexican Paintings.

6, 7, 8. From ancient sculptures.

9. Bracelet from a Peruvian grave.]

_Eastern forms._--The great number of elaborately carved and engraved

gorgets of shell found among the antiquities of the Atlantic slope, all

of which need careful descriptions, so overshadow the simple forms

illustrated in Plate XLVI, that only a brief description of the latter

need be given. Rudeness of workmanship and simplicity of form do not in

any sense imply greater antiquity or a less advanced state of art. The

simpler forms of plain pendants constituted the every-day jewelry of the

average people and, like beads, were probably used freely by all who

desired to do so. Many forms are found--circular, oval, rectangular,

triangular, pear-shaped, and annular. The more ordinary forms are found

in mounds and graves in all parts of the country; other forms are more

restricted geographically, and probably exhibit features peculiar to the

works of a particular clan, tribe, or group of tribes. Even these simple

forms may have possessed some totemic or mystic significance; it is not

impossible that the plainer disks may have had significant figures

painted upon them. Such of the forms as are found to have definite

geographic limits become of considerable interest to the archæologist.

In method of manufacture they do not differ from the most ordinary

implements or beads, the margins being trimmed, the surfaces polished

and the perforations made in a precisely similar manner.

In Plate XLVI I present a number of plain circular disks. The larger

specimens are often as much as four or even five inches in diameter and

the smaller fraternize with beads, as I have shown in Plate XLV. Figs. 1

and 2 are from a mound at Paint Rock Ferry, Tenn. They are neat,

moderately thin, concavo-convex disks, with smooth surfaces and rounded

edges. The first has two perforations at the upper edge, while the other

has similarly placed but much smaller ones, besides a small central

perforation surrounded by an incised circle. The national collection

contains similar specimens from most of the Atlantic States; they differ

from the larger discoidal beads only in the method of perforation. A

typical specimen of this class, four and a half inches in diameter, is

shown in Fig. 3. It was associated with the remains of a number of

children in a mound in Hardin County, Ohio. Disks of this class were

usually suspended upon the breast with the concave side out. That many

of the specimens described were suspended in this way is indicated by

the character of the abrasion produced by the cords. On the concave side

the cord of suspension has worn deep grooves between the perforations,

and on the opposite or convex side similar grooves extend obliquely

upward from the holes toward the margin of the disk, indicating the

passage of the cord upward and outward around the neck of the wearer.

A large white disk, similar to the one just described, was obtained from

a grave at Accotink, Va. It is five inches in diameter and has one

central and three marginal perforations. It is made from a _Busycon

perversum_, and is neatly shaped and well polished.

A fine specimen two inches in diameter was obtained from a mound on the

French Broad River, Tenn., and, with many other similar specimens, is

now in the national collection.

The central perforation is often very much enlarged. A number of

specimens, recently sent to the National Museum, from a mound in

Auglaize County, Ohio, show several stages of this enlargement. One

specimen five inches across has a perforation nearly one inch in

diameter, while in another the perforation is enlarged until the disk

has become a ring. These gorgets show evidences of long use, the

surfaces and edges being worn and the perforations much extended in the

manner described above. They have been derived from the _Busycon

perversum_.

In Fig. 4 I illustrate an annular gorget from a mound in Alexander

County, Ill. It was found associated with ornaments of copper by the

side of a human skull, and is hence supposed to have been an ear

ornament. It is fragmentary and has suffered greatly from decay, the

surface being mostly covered with a dark film of decomposed shell

substance, which when broken away, exposes the chalky surface of the

shell. These shell rings, so far as I can learn, have been found in the

States of Ohio and Illinois only.

Rectangular pendants are much more rare. The national collection

contains one rude specimen from Texas. It is about two inches wide by

two and a half long, and is made from the base of some large

dextral-whorled shell. A similar but much more finished specimen comes

from Georgia, and is preserved in the New York Natural History Museum.

A large keystone-shaped gorget with rounded corners was obtained from an

ancient burial place at Beverly, Canada. It is illustrated in Plate L,

Fig. 1.

The small pendant shown in Fig. 5 is given by Schoolcraft in "Notes on

the Iroquois." It represents rudely the human figure, and is ornamented

with eight perpendicular and four or five transverse dots. It was found

on the site of an old fort near Jamesville, N. Y. In the same work Mr.

Schoolcraft illustrates another small pendant, which is reproduced in

Fig. 6. The body is heart-shaped, the perforation being made through a

rectangular projection at the upper end. It was found at Onondaga, N. Y.

The small pendant presented in Fig. 7 is from West Bloomfield, N. Y. It

has been suspended by means of a shallow groove near the upper end. It

is made from the basal point of a dextral-whorled shell.

The handsome little pendant shown in Fig. 8 was found with similar

specimens in Monroe County, New York--probably on some ancient village

site. It is well preserved and has been made from the columella of a

dextral-whorled shell. An ornamental design, consisting of lines and

dots, is engraved upon the face. A small, deeply countersunk perforation

has been made near the upper end. These objects have apparently been

strung with beads, as the perforations show evidence of such abrasion as

beads would produce. Many of the New York specimens have a new look, and

their form suggests the possibility of civilized influence. They are

certainly more recent than the western and southern specimens.

A small cylindrical pendant is illustrated in Fig. 9. A large, neat

perforation has been made at the upper end, and the middle portion of

the body is ornamented by a series of encircling grooves. This specimen

has been made from a large _Unio_ and was obtained from a mound in Union

County, Ky.

[Illustration: PL. XLVI--PENDANT ORNAMENTS--EASTERN FORMS.]

_Western forms._--In variety of form the plain pendants of the

California coast excel all others. Specimens from the graves are

generally well preserved, not having lost their original iridescence,

although so much decayed as to suffer considerably from exfoliation.

As indicated by the present well preserved condition of these shell

ornaments, they are probably not of very ancient date; indeed it is

highly probable that many of them are post-Columbian.

Cabrillo visited the island of Santa Rosa in 1542 and found a numerous

and thriving people. In 1816 only a small remnant of the inhabitants

remained, and these were removed to the main-land by Catholic priests.

Their destruction is attributed to both war and famine. The history of

the other islands is doubtless somewhat similar.

Articles made from shell are found to resemble each other very closely,

whether from the islands or the main-land. All probably belong to the

same time, and although the peoples of the islands are said to have

spoken a different language from those of the main-land, their arts were

apparently pretty much the same. They do not differ, as far as works in

shell are concerned, from the modern tribes of the main-land. There is

also a noticeable resemblance between the art of the ancient California

Islanders and that of the present inhabitants of the great Pacific

archipelagoes.

The record of many of the specimens obtained from these islands seems to

be very incomplete, scarcely more being known than the fact that they

were obtained from the ancient graves. Since, however, they are almost

exclusively ornaments belonging probably to a single period, detailed

accounts of their methods of occurrence would not add greatly to their

value.

In previous chapters vessels, hooks, and beads made of the _Haliotis_

have been described, and the high estimation in which they are

everywhere held briefly noted. The variety of ways in which this shell

is utilized is indeed remarkable and the multitude of forms into which

it is worked for ornament is a matter of surprise. All are neatly and

effectively worked, and evince no little skill and taste on the part of

the makers.

The _Haliotis_ is not the only shell used, but it has no rival in point

of beauty. Bivalve shells are utilized to a considerable extent, many

tasteful things being made from the _Fissurella_, the _Mytilus_, the

_Pachydesma_, and the _Pecten_. The perforations are generally neatly

made and are more numerous than in similar eastern specimens; besides

those for suspension there are frequently many others for the attachment

of secondary pendants and for fastening to the costume. Many specimens

are ornamented with edgings of notches and crossed lines but very few

have been found on which significant characters have been engraved, and

we look in vain for parallels to the curious designs characteristic of

the gorgets of the mound-builders.

A glance at the numerous examples given in Plates XLVII, XLVIII, and

XLIX will give a good idea of the multiplicity of forms into which these

ornaments are wrought.

A rather remarkable group of pendants is represented by Fig. 1. They are

characterized by a deep scallop at the left, with a long curved

hook-like projection above. They take their form from the shape of the

lip of the _Haliotis_, from which they are made--the hook being the

upper point of the outer lip where it joins the body, and the scallop

the line of the suture. The body of the ornament is formed from the lip

of the shell. In size they vary to some extent with the shells from

which they are derived. The body is at times quite oval and again

slender and hooked like the blade of a sickle. The perforations are

generally very numerous, a fact that indicates their use as central

pieces for composite pendants. It is apparent that the wearers thought

more of the exquisite coloring of these ornaments than of the outline or

surface finish. This is only one of many instances that prove the innate

and universal appreciation of beauty of color by savage peoples.

In Fig. 2 a fine example of the subtriangular or keystone-shaped

pendants is presented. The edges are very neatly cut and the corners

slightly rounded. The back is ground smooth, but on the front the

original surface of the shell is preserved, the colors being extremely

rich and brilliant. A single perforation has been drilled near the upper

end. It is made from a _Haliotis rufescens_, and was obtained from the

island of Santa Rosa.

The handsome specimen shown in Fig. 3 was obtained from a grave on the

island of San Miguel. It has suffered much from decay. There are four

neatly made perforations near the center. It has apparently been cut

from the same shell as the preceding.

Fig. 4 is a small keystone-shaped specimen having two perforations.

Fig. 5 represents a small, delicate specimen of rectangular shape,

having two minute perforations. This, as well as the preceding, was

obtained from a grave on the island of San Miguel.

Fig. 6 illustrates a small oval, wafer-like specimen, the edges of which

have been ornamented with a series of crossed lines. It has three neat

perforations on the line of the longer axis. It is from the island of

Santa Cruz.

Fig. 7 represents a small button-like disk with a central perforation;

the margin is ornamented with a series of radiating lines. It was

obtained from Santa Barbara.

A pendant of very peculiar form is shown in Fig. 8. The oval body has

three marginal projections, all of which are perforated; there is also a

perforation near the center. The surface retains a heavy coating of some

dark substance, which gives the ornament much the appearance of corroded

metal. It was obtained from San Miguel Island.

In a number of cases advantage has been taken of the natural

perforations of the shell, both to give variety to the outline of small

pendants and to save the labor of making artificial perforations. A very

handsome little specimen is shown in Fig. 9. The two indentations above

and below represent two of the natural perforations of the shell;

artificial perforations are made in each of the four corners or wings.

It was also obtained from the island of San Miguel.

Fig. 10 represents a leaf-shaped pendant with notched edges and a single

perforation. It comes from the island of Santa Cruz.

[Illustration: PL. XLVII--PLAIN PENDANTS--PACIFIC COAST FORMS.

(1/1)]

The examples given are typical of the very large class of ornaments

derived from the _Haliotidæ_. The striking specimens shown in

Plate XLVIII are, with one exception, made from shells of this class.

The two sickle-shaped pendants illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2 are made

from the broadened inner lip of the _Haliotis californianus_ (?). In one

a single perforation has been made near the upper end; in the other

there are two, one near each end. The faces have been neatly dressed and

the corners ornamented with minute notches. They are from graves on

Santa Cruz Island. Two exquisite specimens, also from Santa Cruz Island,

are presented in Figs. 3 and 4. They have been cut from the body of a

_Haliotis splendens_ (?), and finished with much care. Two perforations

have been made near the upper margin, which is arched or curved while

the lower is nearly straight. The edges are neatly notched. Although

somewhat altered by exposure these objects are still very pretty.

A very neat, well preserved little pendant is shown in Fig. 5. The

specimen presented in Fig. 6 is peculiar in having a series of five

perforations, one near the middle and the others near the ends. The

example given in Fig. 7 has two perforations, one at each end. These are

all made from species of the _Haliotis_.

The specimen presented in Fig. 8 is made from the lip of a _Cyprea

spadicea_ with very little change except the carefully made perforation.

It is from the island of San Miguel. The idea of beautifying ornaments

made from the _Haliotis_ and other shells by notching the edges may have

been suggested by the natural notches characteristic of the _Cypreas_.

[Illustration: PL. XLVIII--PENDANT ORNAMENTS OF THE PACIFIC COAST.

1-7. Pendants made of the _Haliotis_. (1/1)

8. Pendant made of a _Cyprea_. (1/1)]

Figs. 1, 2, and 3, Plate XLIX, illustrate a group of small, delicate,

ladle-shaped pendants. The perforation for suspension is at the upper

end of the handle and the body has an oval or circular perforation,

which is often so enlarged as to leave only a narrow ring, like the rim

of an eyeglass. The specimen shown in Fig. 3 has two lobes, with a large

perforation or opening in each. In one instance the handle is quite wide

at the upper end and ornamented by two deep lateral notches. The edges

of these specimens are nearly always adorned with notches or crossed

lines. All are fashioned from the _Haliotis_, and although considerably

stained are still well enough preserved to show the pearly lusters of

that shell.

Circular and oval disks are also numerous and vary much in finish; some

have a great number of perforations or indentations, and nearly all are

neatly notched around the margins. Examples are given in Figs. 4 and 5.

The national collection contains a number of rings and pieces of rings

made from the valves of a large clam, probably a _Pectunculus_, one

example of which is shewn in Fig. 6. The convex back of the shell is

ground off until a marginal ring only remains. A perforation is made

near the angle of the beak. The shell is from the California coast, but

the rings were collected mostly if not entirely from Arizona and New

Mexico. It is not impossible that the tribes of the interior procured

these articles from white traders, as they are known to have secured

other shell ornaments in this way.

The natives of the California coast were not slow in taking advantage of

natural forms to aid their art or to save labor. The shells of the

_Fissurellidæ_ as well as of the _Haliotidæ_ have been in great favor.

They have been used as beads and pendants in their natural state or the

natural perforations have been enlarged until only a ring has been left,

or the margin and sides have been ground down until nothing of the

original form or surface remained. Two of these forms are shown in

Figs. 7 and 8. They are from graves on San Miguel Island, and are made

from the _Lucupina crenulata_; others come from Santa Cruz Island; and

probably also from the adjoining islands as well as from the main-land.

Rings are also made from other shells. Examples made from the _Acmæa

mitra_ and _Cyprea spadicea_ are shown in Figs. 9, 10, and 11. They come

from San Miguel.

[Illustration: PL. XLIX--PLAIN PENDANTS--PACIFIC COAST FORMS.

(1/1)]

Art in Shell of the Ancient Americans Second annual report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1880-81, pages 179-306 · 第 35 / 48 题