CHAPTER VIII

THE WALLS OF THEODOSIUS TO THE GATE OF ST. ROMANUS

Having escaped from the hands of the Artist, the travellers fall into

the clutches of the Author, who insists on showing them the Golden Gate

from both sides as it really is to-day. For that purpose we enter by a

gateway a little to the north of the Porta Aurea. This is called Yedi

Koulé Kapoussi, or the "Gate of the Seven Towers," and stands where

stood formerly a Byzantine gate through which Basil entered the city. As

we may infer from its name, the present gate is of Turkish origin, as

are also the strong towers that rise up on our right. Bearing

southwards, we come to an entrance in that section of the wall which

faces east. We enter and stand, in fact, where we had stood in

imagination watching the triumphant pageants of former ages defiling

past us. We may enter one of the strong towers, the shape of which is

familiar to all who have visited Roumeli Hissar, and thus we know it to

be of Turkish construction. A winding staircase

[Illustration: PART OF TURKISH FORTRESS OF YEDI KOULÉ.

We may enter one of the strong towers, the shape of which is familiar to

all who have visited Roumeli Hissar, and thus we know it to be of

Turkish construction.]

leads us to the rampart; through a bend in the wall we may look down

into the interior of the tower, where erstwhile spacious vaulted

chambers held the garrison while captives pined in the dungeons below.

The romantic tales that cling to all dungeons are not wanting here, for

beneath this spot even ambassadors are said to have languished, though

probably not for any length of time, for the person of such high

representatives of foreign potentates partake in some degree of their

master's lustre and may not be lightly treated. Nevertheless, the

Venetian ambassador was once arrested by Achmet III, when he and Charles

XII, the most picturesque figure of the beginning of the eighteenth

century, were allied against Russia, and Venetian possessions in Morea

barred the path of further Turkish conquests.

As we walk along the top of the ramparts we see how strong these ruined

walls still remain, and how much greater their strength must have been

when rebuilt in 1457 A.D. by Mahomet the conqueror. And before Mahomet's

day this citadel's history was a record of stout resistance to the

city's enemies, for it long defied the onslaught of the Turks, who

rebuilt it when the city fell into their hands. The Sultan had planted a

cannon before this stronghold, and tried its strength with other engines

of war, but Manuel of Liguria and his two hundred men held out until

the end.

A pathetic figure appeared in 1347, John Cantacuzene, who, though a

loyal guardian to his young Imperial master, was driven into civil war

by court intrigues. His followers admitted him into this stronghold

before he retired to monastic seclusion. He had some difficulty in

persuading his partisans, the Latin garrison, to surrender to John

Palæologus. This emperor then thought fit to weaken the defences of this

citadel, but luckily left it strong enough to protect himself from the

attacks of his rebellious son Andronicus.

Good reason for strengthening the fort occurred when Bajazet roamed at

large in Europe, and John Palæologus set about doing so. The Sultan,

hearing of it, sent an order that those new defences should be at once

pulled down again, and that non-compliance would mean the loss of

eyesight to Manuel, heir to the throne and at that time hostage in the

Turkish camp.

Standing on the ramparts of this ancient stronghold it is difficult to

realize the old days of stress and storm. In the clear air and sunshine

life seems too serene for the fierce passions that drove a swarm of

Saracens in repeated attacks against the grey walls. These fiery

followers of the prophet came up from the South over that limpid sea.

Yet in the seventh century, forty-six years after the flight of Mahomed

from Mecca, it was alive with the lateen sails of the swarthy marauders.

Caliph Moawiyah had no sooner resumed the throne by suppressing his

rivals than he decided to wipe away the bloodstains of civil strife by a

holy war. A holy war, if it is to attain to the fullest perfection of

sanctity, should also be profitable, and no richer prize offered than

Constantinople. The Arabs, since they had issued from the desert, had

found victory rapid and easy of achievement; so, having carried their

triumphant ensign to the banks of the Indus and the heights of the

Pyrenees, they had some reason to consider themselves invincible. Not

only was the capital of the Eastern Empire the richest prize, but its

conquest seemed to present no great difficulties, as an unworthy emperor

loosely held the reins of government at this time. Heraclius had entered

the Golden Gate in triumph after defeating the Persians. Constantine,

his grandson, third of that name, was called upon to defend it against

the Saracens.

These fierce warriors were allowed to pass unchallenged through the

narrow channel of the Dardanelles, where they might at least have been

checked, and landed near the Hebdomon. Day by day, from dawn till

sunset, the sons of the desert surged round the stately defences of the

city, their main attack being directed against the Golden Gate. Every

attempt proved abortive, yet they held on with marvellous persistence.

On the approach of winter they would retire to a base established on the

isle of Cysicus, where they stored their spoils and provisions. For six

successive summers they kept up the attempt upon the city walls, their

hope and vigour gradually fading, until shipwreck and disease, allied

with sword and fire, the newly-invented Greek fire, forced them to

relinquish the fruitless enterprise. Their losses are computed at 30,000

slain, and among these they bewailed the loss of Abou Eyub or Tob. That

venerable Arab was one of the last-surviving companions of Mahomed; he

was numbered among the ansars or auxiliaries of Medina, who sheltered

the head of the fugitive prophet. Eyub lies buried at a spot not far

from the northern extremity of the land-walls on the shores of the

Golden Horn, where a mosque, one of the most beautiful of all those that

adorn Constantinople, now enshrines his bones. It is at this Mosque of

Eyub that the Sultan, on his accession, is girded with the sacred sword

of Othmar, a ceremony that compares in religious importance with the

coronation of a Christian monarch.

The unsuccessful issue of the Saracen attacks upon Constantinople cast

a shadow upon the lustre of their army, and revived both in the East and

West the prestige of the Roman sword. A truce of thirty years was

ratified at Damascus in 677, and the majesty of the Commander of the

Faithful was dimmed by the necessity of paying tribute, fifty horses of

a noble breed, fifty slaves and three thousand pieces of gold.

A yet more barbarous enemy appeared before this section of the city

walls in Leo the Armenian's reign. Rumours of their approach had reached

the city, and it was heralded by vast clouds of dust raised by the feet

of innumerable flocks of sheep and goats who accompanied these

adventurers wherever they went. They pitched their leathern tents on the

plain and heights outside the Golden Gate, where their strange aspect

startled those who held watch and ward over the city. These barbarians

were clad in furs, they shaved their heads and scarified their faces, of

luxury they knew nothing, and their sole industries were violence and

rapine.

Finding all his efforts against the stout walls of the city unavailing,

King Crum, the leader of these hordes, offered up human sacrifices under

the Golden Gate. But this failed to propitiate his gods, and one day a

receding cloud of dust announced the departure of these savage enemies.

Another foe knocked at the portal of the Golden Gate and tried his

strength against the wall in vain, though sometimes more successful in

the open field. A new power had arisen on the banks of the Danube in the

days of Constantine III--the Bulgarians.

Whence they came and what their origin is still a matter of conjecture

best left to those whose business it is to find out. Suffice it to say

that they appear from time to time and trouble the peace of the Eastern

Empire, or on some rare occasions act as its allies. Their history is

strangely stirring. Theodoric, in his march to Italy, had trampled on

them, and for a century and a half all traces of their name and nation

disappear from the historian's ken. In the ninth century we hear of them

again on the southern bank of the Danube. Their return to the North from

whence they came was prevented by a stronger race that followed them,

whilst their progress to the West was checked by more powerful nations

in that quarter. They found some vent for their military ardour in

opposing the inroads of the Eastern emperors, and may lay claim to an

honour till then appropriated only by the Goths--that of having slain a

Roman emperor in battle.

It came about in this fashion. The Emperor Nicephorus had advanced with

boldness and success into the west of Bulgaria and destroyed the royal

court by fire. But while he lingered on in search of spoil, refusing

all treaties, his enemies collected their forces and barred the passes

of retreat. For two days the Emperor waited in despair and inactivity,

on the third the Bulgarians surprised the camp and slew the Emperor and

great officers of the Eastern Empire. Valens had, after the Emperor's

death at the hands of the Goths, escaped from insult, but the skull of

Nicephorus I, encased with gold, served as a drinking vessel.

Before the end of the same century a better understanding had been

established, and the sons of Bulgarian nobles were educated in the

schools and palaces of Constantinople; among them was Simeon, a youth of

royal line, of whom Luitprand the historian says: "Simeon fortis

bellator, Bulgariæ proecrat; Christianus sed vicinis Græcis valde

inimicus." Many Bulgarian youths are even now being educated at the

Robert College.

Simeon was intended for a religious life, but he abandoned it to take up

arms; he inherited the crown of Bulgaria and reigned over that country

from the end of the ninth to well into the tenth century. His hostility

to the Greeks found frequent expression, and he and his host appeared

before the walls of Constantinople. On classic ground at Achelous, the

Greeks were vanquished by the Bulgarians, thereupon Simeon hastened to

besiege the Emperor in his own strong city. Simeon and the Emperor met

in conference--the Bulgarians vying with the Greeks in the splendour of

their display, though combined with the most jealous precautions against

unpleasant surprises, and their monarch dictated the terms on which he

would agree to peace. "Are you a Christian?" asked the humbled Emperor

Romanus I. "It is your duty to abstain from the blood of your

fellow-Christians. Has the thirst for riches seduced you from the

blessings of peace? Sheath your sword, open your hand and I will give

you the utmost measure of your desire."

Soon the successors of Simeon by their jealousies undermined the

strength of the kingdom, and when next they went forth to meet the

Greeks in battle Basil II found no great difficulty in defeating them. A

terrible home-coming theirs; through snow and ice the remnant of

Bulgaria's manhood struggled on in little bands of a hundred at a time,

following the voice, each company, of a single leader, as they groped

their way through the darkness. For they were blinded. They had escaped

from the clemency of a Christian emperor, by whose orders only one man

in a hundred retained the sight of one eye. The King of the Bulgarians

died of grief. His people lived on, contained within the limits of a

narrow province, to wait in patience for revenge. The visitor to Sofia,

the new capital of a new Bulgaria, should not fail to inspect the

museum, carefully and skilfully arranged by King Ferdinand. There he

will find, among a host of interesting matter, pictures illustrating the

history of the country. Of these works none is more strikingly pathetic

than one which represents the return of those sightless Bulgarian

warriors.

As after the crushing defeat inflicted on the inhabitants of Bulgaria by

the Goths, the country silently and forcefully waited to regain its

strength. Another century and a half elapsed after the victory of Basil

Bulgaroktonos before the Bulgarians regained offensive power. During

this interval they existed as a province of the dominions of Byzantium,

and no attempts were made to impose Roman laws and usage upon them.

It was Isaac Angelus who lashed the Bulgarians to desperation by driving

away their only means of subsistence--their flocks and herds--to

contribute to the extravagant splendour that was wasted on his nuptials.

Two powerful Bulgarian chiefs--Peter and Asan--rose in revolt, asserted

their own rights and the national freedom, and spread the fire of

rebellion from the Danube to the hills of Macedonia and Thrace. By the

supineness of the Emperor these proceedings were allowed to pass

unchecked, a fact which added to the contempt felt for the Greeks by

their former subjects. Asan addressed his troops in these words: "In all

the Greeks, the same climate and character and education will be

productive of the same fruits. Behold my lance and the long streamers

that float in the wind. They differ only in colour, they are formed of

the same silk and fashioned by the same workman, nor has the stripe that

is stained in purple any superior price or value above its fellows."

So after several faint efforts Isaac and his brother, who usurped the

throne, acquiesced in the independence of the Bulgarians. John, or

Joannice, ascended the throne of a second kingdom of Bulgaria, and

submitted himself as a spiritual vassal to the Pope, from whom he

received a licence to coin money, a royal title and a Latin archbishop.

Thus the Vatican accomplished the spiritual conquest of Bulgaria, the

first object of the schism between the Western and the Eastern See when,

after the disorders provoked by hopeless Eastern emperors, such as

Alexius IV and V, and Nicolas Canabus, the Latins gained possession of

the throne of Cæsar. Calo-John, as he was called, King of Bulgaria, sent

friendly greetings to Baldwin I, but these provoked an unexpected

answer. The

[Illustration: THEODOSIAN WALL AND APPROACH TO BELGRADE KAPOUSSI, SECOND

MILITARY STATE.

These are the Theodosian Walls, the proudest and most lasting monument

to that dynasty which was founded when Gratian invested Theodosius with

the Imperial Purple.]

Latin Emperor demanded that the rebel should deserve his pardon by

touching with his forehead the footstool of the Imperial throne. So

trouble broke out again, again war was waged with all its attendant

savagery, and Calo-John reinforced his army by a body of 14,000 horsemen

from the Scythian deserts. A fierce battle at Adrianople resulted in the

total defeat of the Emperor, and he himself was taken prisoner. His fate

was for some years uncertain, and even the demands of the Pope for the

restitution of the Emperor failed to elicit any other answer from King

John, save that Baldwin had died in prison. For years the conflict raged

till Henry, the second of the Latin Emperors, routed the Bulgarians.

Calo-John was slain in his tent by night, and the deed was piously

ascribed to the lance of St. Demetrius.

We have followed the sad fate of the crusade which Pope Urban proclaimed

against the Turks in a preceding chapter and seen how Amurath,

surprising the Christian camp, drove his enemies before him "as flames

driven before the wind, till plunging into the Maritza they perished in

its waters." Sisvan the Bulgarian King obtained a peace at the price of

the marriage of his daughter to Amurath in 1389, invaded the kingdom of

Bulgaria, making Adrianople the base of operations; how Sisvan the king

fled to Nicopolis, was there besieged by Ali and surrendered.

From that date till quite recent times Bulgaria has been incorporated in

the Ottoman Empire. Now, after a lapse of over five centuries, she has

again established her national identity and under an enlightened and

progressive ruler gives promise of holding her own without experiencing

another break in the history of the race. The Golden Gate and its

romantic history has claimed a considerable portion of the travellers'

and the Author's time. The Artist hopes his pencil has done sufficient

justice to those glorious ruins, and for some time has turned eager eyes

northward, where a line of stately towers and masses of ruined masonry

offer fair prospect of enriching his store of sketches.

The road that leads us onward may perhaps pass unrecognized as such by

travellers who are used to the smooth surface over which the motor races

in a cloud of dust in Western countries. But let the Author assure them

that this broad track, one side supplied with rough stones picturesquely

dispersed, the other chiefly consisting of ruts and holes, is indeed a

road, and that, too, one whereon we have to travel. Moving along we soon

forget its shortcomings in the beauty of the scenery on either hand. To

the left a gentle ridge, and everywhere, as far as eye can see,

countless cypress-trees, some in stately groups, others in dark, jagged

masses. Beneath these rest faithful sons of Islam, many of whom dashed

out their souls against the walls that rise on our right hand. Tier upon

tier they rise--some almost intact, others battered beyond recognition,

right away from the Golden Gate to within sight of the Golden Horn.

These are the Theodosian walls, the proudest and most lasting monument

to that dynasty which was founded when Gratian invested Theodosius with

the Imperial Purple.

We watched the enceinte of the city of Byzas grow, saw how the walls he

built to landward could no longer contain the increasing population. The

walls that Byzas built have vanished, and those of Constantine the Great

have served their purpose, and were dismantled, so that to Theodosius II

was left the task of giving to the city its widest limits. Historians of

the time draw a pleasant picture of the scene when these walls were

erected. The different factions all combined to help, and inscriptions,

still to be seen, testify to this fact. All citizens were called upon to

assist, so without waste of time these walls arose. Misfortune visited

them shortly after their completion, when an earthquake overthrew a

great portion of the work, including fifty-seven towers. At an

inopportune moment too, for the arms of Theodosius had suffered defeat

by Attila in three successive engagements, and "The Scourge of God," as

he was pleased to call himself, having ravaged the provinces of

Macedonia and Thrace with fire and sword, was drawing very near to

Constantinople. But two determined men--Constantine, Prætorian Prefect

of the East, and Marcellius Comes--called upon the patriotism of the

populace, and in less than three months the damaged walls had been

restored and even strengthened by their united efforts.

An imposing prospect these walls still offer even in their present

state; how much more formidable must they have appeared when all one

hundred and ninety-two towers stood firm and unshaken and the walls

between had not been broken by an enemy's artillery or dismantled by the

tooth of time! Their construction was a marvel of devotion, their plan

the work of genius, for of its kind no defences better calculated to

protect a city were ever devised by human ingenuity. Let us move to the

very edge of the road, where there is a slightly raised and extremely

irregular footpath, and take a general and comprehensive glance at the

walls of Theodosius. At our feet the counterscarp which stayed the earth

on the enemy's side from filling up the moat. There comes the moat over

sixty feet in width. The depth when still in use is not known to us, but

we know from our visit to the Golden Gate that it must have been

considerable.

The wall we see on the further side of the moat, taking the enemy's

point of view, is the scarp. Some of its battlements remain; they served

to cover the movements of troops on the terrace between the scarp and

the wall. This outer wall rises to about ten feet and tapers from a base

of about six feet in thickness to two feet at the summit. From the

remains of this wall we can gather that it contained a long series of

vaulted chambers which offered shelter to the troops engaged in the

defence, and there are loopholes facing west, through which their fire

was directed. Small towers, some round, others square, about thirty-five

feet high, still further strengthened the position. But the main defence

lay in the inner wall, separated from the outer one by a broad terrace

of some fifty feet, which served as a parade-ground for the troops that

garrisoned the chambers of the outer wall, when the city was invested by

an enemy. This imposing mass of fortifications stands on a higher level

than the others, and here the main strength of the defence was

stationed. A chain of mighty towers composed it, and they are linked

together by stout walls known as curtains to the expert. These towers,

most of which are square, stand about one hundred and seventy feet

apart, and rose, when in their completed state, to a height of sixty

feet, standing out some twenty feet from the curtain. Each tower

contained, as a rule, two chambers, was built of carefully cut stone and

vaulted inside with brick. Many a broken tower shows on the outside some

mark or inscription dating back to the distant days of the glory of old

Byzantium. On the city side of the inner wall may still be seen traces

of stone steps that led up to the summit, whence other flights of steps

led under cover of battlements to the roof of each tower.

For ten centuries these walls defied all onslaughts of an enemy; the

battle-cry of many strange races, some whose day is done, others who

stand high in the history of civilization to-day, was answered by shouts

of defiance from the defenders of the city. So let us cross over the

moat and look into one of those huge towers, which with their attendant

curtains gave the Eastern capital its immunity from invasion for so many

ages. Though appearing to form one solid mass, they are in reality built

separately, so as to allow for the different rate of sinking between

buildings of different weight.

We may enter one of these broken towers from the

[Illustration: THEODOSIAN WALL.--A BROKEN TOWER, OUTSIDE.

Many a broken tower shows on the outside some mark or inscription dating

back to the distant days of the glory of old Byzantium.]

inner terrace, by a gap in the strong stonework, caused probably by an

earthquake. This opening takes us to a place half-way between the floor

and ceiling of the lower chamber. The vaulting that supported the upper

floor has fallen in, but we can trace it in the brickwork that here, as

elsewhere amid these walls, recall in shape and colour the remains of

the defences of Imperial Rome. And yet another likeness strikes us in

the courses of brick, laid at intervals in the construction of walls and

towers, which served to bind the mass of masonry yet more firmly. This

lower chamber, all dismantled now, and overgrown with weeds, may in

times of peace have served a peaceful purpose. Access to it was from

inside the walls, and the proprietor of the land on which it stood was

permitted to use it for what purposes he chose. But when the fire

signals that flared on the tops of convenient heights gave notice of an

enemy's approach these vaults would ring with the sound of armour and

the epithets wherewith soldiers of all ages are supposed to garnish

their remarks.

Arms and their use, and armour to protect the warrior, knew but few

changes during the centuries that these walls fulfilled their purpose.

Men went to war clad in armour more or less protected according to their

rank and the weight they were able to sustain. Their weapons were bow

and arrow, sword, battle-axe and spear, and their tactics did not

require a constant series of new regulations. Even the invention of

Greek fire did not bring about a revolution in the methods of warfare,

although it was used with deadly effect both in sieges and sea-fights.

For many years the Greek Empire maintained the traditions of the Roman

legions, but the men were not of the same stern stuff. Instead of

accustoming their mercenaries to the weight of armour by constant use,

they carried it after them in light chariots, until on the approach of

an enemy it was resumed with haste and reluctance.

The need of reviving the martial spirit was felt by many an emperor, and

edicts were issued commanding all able-bodied males up to the age of

forty, to make themselves proficient in the practice of the bow. But the

Greek populace resisted these commands, so when the time of trial came

they were found wanting, and had to give up their possessions into the

hands of a stronger, sterner race, with loftier conceptions of a

citizen's duty.

With these reflections we must turn away from the vaults of the ruined

tower, and leave it as a symbol of the decay that eats out the heart of

all nations who forget that their country's greatness was built up only

[Illustration: THEODOSIAN WALL--A BROKEN TOWER (INSIDE).

We must turn away from the vaults of the ruined tower, and leave it as a

symbol of the decay that eats out the heart of all nations who forget

that their country's greatness was built up only by the self-sacrifice

of former generations.]

by the self-sacrifice of former generations, and that patriotism

requires deeds and not mere empty words to maintain the heirlooms of the

past.

There are a number of gates that pierce the Theodosian walls. With some

of them we have little concern. Their purpose was to expedite the

manning of the defences by former garrisons. We pass the second military

gate, now known as Belgrad Kapoussi, all embowered in trees, the moat in

front of it filled up to serve the peaceful purpose of a market-garden.

Our way leads on along the road, which makes a curve more to northward

and rises slightly.

On the higher ground groups of cypress rise in sharp outline against the

sky. On our left hand is an historic spot, for here stood the Church of

St. Mary of the Pegé, the Holy Spring. A road led to this sanctuary

through a gate still standing, called the Gate of the Pegé, now Silivria

Kapoussi. Numbers of pious pilgrims have passed this way barefooted, to

test the healing qualities of the Holy Spring with the added strength of

faith, and on the high festival of the Ascension the Emperor himself

would visit here in solemn state.

One of these emperors, of whom we have already heard so much, was stoned

by the populace on his return, and only with difficulty regained his

palace by the Sea of Marmora--the Emperor Nicephorus Phocas. This gate

contributed again to the history of the Byzantine Empire when Alexius

Strategopoulos, general of Michael Palæologus, entered here in 1261,

drove out the Latin Emperor and reinstated his Imperial master.

Andronicus, that rebel, entered the city by this gate to usurp his

father's throne.

Amurath II camped here, in the grounds of the Church of the Holy Spring,

during the first half of the fifteenth century, and less than fifty

years later, in the last scene of the Eastern Empire's romantic history,

a battery of three guns attacked this point.

A few hundred yards to northward of the historic portals of Silivria is

the third military gate, and at the northern tower that flanks it the

inner wall recedes for a short space and then comes out again to

continue in a straight line. This recess is called the Sigma, and in the

quarter that lies behind this section of the wall, dramatic events in

the life of Constantinople took place.

Our travellers must again return to those dim ages of turbulent history.

Constantine IX had died in 1028, the last of the Macedonian dynasty

founded by that Basil whom we watched as he entered by the side entrance

of the Golden Gate weary and travel-stained,

[Illustration: GATE OF RHEGIUM, OR YEDI MEVLEVI HANEH.

The Gate of Rhegium--now known as Yedi Mevlevi Haneh, Kapoussi.]

but later to rise to the Imperial Purple. Of Constantine's three

daughters, Eudoxia took the veil and Theodora declined to marry. There

remained Zoe, who professed herself a willing sacrifice at the hymeneal

altar. A bridegroom was found for her in one Romanus Orgyrus, a

patrician, but he declined the honour on the sufficient ground of being

already married. Romanus was informed that blindness or death were the

alternatives to a royal match, and his devoted wife sacrificed her

happiness to her husband's safety and greatness by retiring into a

convent and thus removing the only bar to the Imperial nuptials. So

Romanus reigned as third emperor of that name, though not for long, for

Zoe found in her chamberlain, Michael the Paphlagonian, attractions

superior to those of her lawful spouse. Romanus died suddenly and Zoe

married Michael immediately, and raised him to the throne as fourth

emperor of that name. But he, too, proved disappointing, so yet another

Michael, a nephew, was introduced into the story by John the Eunuch,

brother of the Emperor.

Michael IV died and Michael V reigned in his stead, but only for a year.

His first act was to disgrace his uncle John, his second was the exile

of his adopted mother, the daughter of so many emperors. This roused the

populace to fury. The Emperor Michael Calaphates, as he was called

after his father's trade, was dragged from the monastery of Studius,

where he had taken refuge, to the statue of Theodosius III in the

quarter of the Sigma. Here he and his uncle Constantine were deprived of

their eyesight.

Our road leads on and, rising slightly, brings us to yet another gate,

known to the chroniclers of Byzantine history as the Gate of Rhegium, a

town some twelve miles distant, now called Kutchuk Tchekmejdé. This gate

was erected by the Red faction, and was no doubt at one time a busy

thoroughfare. Now it is know as Yedi Mevlevi, Haneh Kapoussi. It is

almost deserted; two slender cypress-trees guard the entrance, through

which you may see a white-turbaned hodja pass on his way towards the

mosque, whose tapering minaret gleams over the broken, ivy-clad

battlements.

Rising higher as we go on, we pass stately groups of cypresses on our

left, and before us, where the road bends slightly to the right, a very

forest of those trees guarding a Turkish cemetery where thousands of the

faithful are interred. Let us step on to one of those low walls that

cross the moat; their original purpose has not yet been definitely

ascertained; their summit used to taper to a sharp edge, but this has

worn away and we find ample standing room. Looking back the

[Illustration: TOP KAPOUSSI, GATE OF ST. ROMANUS.

The slight bend in the road takes us to the Gate of St. Romanus, now

known as Top Kapoussi.]

way we came, we see a double line of walls and towers, that for so many

years guarded the City of Constantine and allowed the nations of the

West to evolve from chaos. The moat, once a serious obstacle to an

assailant, now produces from its fertile soil the fruits of a gardener's

labours. Across the road the serried ranks of cypress-trees in their

impenetrable gloom, and right away, over the ruins of Yedi Koulé, the

deep blue Sea of Marmora merging into the clearer azure of a southern

sky.

The slight bend in the road takes us due north, though until now we have

been holding a point or two to west, and across a worse pavement than

before we search the Gate of St. Romanus, now known as Top Kapoussi.

Beyond the road this gate is guarded by an unnumbered multitude that

rest here under the forest of cypress-trees. Two roads converge upon

this gate, so there is a stream of oriental life continually passing

through it by day. Troops marching out to field-drill in the morning,

mules and ponies entering with baskets full of country produce, and

perhaps a string of camels, laden with Eastern goods, setting out for

the Western provinces. And in the gateway you may see signs of

commercial enterprise, small booths and stalls doing trade in a

dignified and oriental way, while a cobbler sits in the sunshine mending

shoes, the wearer of which waits barefooted and deep in contemplation.

From sunrise to sunset this place is full of the sounds and sights that

travellers in the East are wont to enjoy, but at night it is given over

to haunting memories.

Entering this gate one afternoon, the Artist had an experience which he

is burning to relate. A tram-line leads from here into the heart of the

city; a car was about to start and the Artist boarded it. Drawn by a

horse with no ambition to break records, the journey proceeded. The

other passengers were two Armenians, Army doctors, and a Turk, a young

man of independent habits and picturesquely clad. All paid their fare to

the conductor, a venerable Turk with a long grey beard. All but the

young man--he declined emphatically. "But it is usual to pay," protested

the conductor--"every one pays who travels by this tram; those effendi

there have paid." No! the young man would not unbend--he still more

resolutely refused. So in despair the old conductor turned to the other

passengers and asked: "May this be?" "Is this the will of Allah?" The

doctors shook their heads and answered nothing; the Artist, usually so

well informed, held his peace, for he is no authority on the view that

Allah may take of tram-fares. So the

[Illustration: THIRD MILITARY GATE.

In the gateway you may see signs of commercial enterprise.

From sunrise to sunset this place is full of the sounds and sights that

travellers in the East are wont to enjoy.]

journey proceeded, but not for long. The road being up, the passengers

alighted, though they had paid a fare entitling them to travel to the

end. This no doubt was Kismet--but it affords a striking instance of the

way in which the rain of Allah falls on just and unjust without

preference or distinction.

The Walls of Constantinople · 第 8 / 10 章