Mounting the Cells on the Satellite

The third part of our problem had to do with finding the best ways to

mount and protect the cells on the Telstar satellite itself. Since a

satellite’s solar power plant usually has several thousand cells, we

find it best to mount the cells in groups, or modules. These can be

pretested as a unit after individual interconnections have been made.

For Telstar I, we decided to mount the 3600 solar cells in 12-cell

modules like those shown in the _figure below_.

[Illustration: _The satellite uses 300 modules of twelve solar

cells, in groups of six or three modules per facet._]

[Illustration: _Lengthwise diagram of a solar cell module, showing

how individual cells were fixed in place._]

Each of the cells has a top contact along one edge and a bottom contact

all over its base, so we were able to assemble the 12-cell groups like

shingles, with the bottom edge of one cell covering the top edge of the

next, leaving only the active area of each cell exposed. But this meant

that each module would be over four inches long and only 14 thousandths

of an inch thick—far too weak to withstand stress and vibration. To

support the cells, we decided to mount them on a metallized ceramic

base. But this presented a problem: If the cells were soldered directly

to the base, the different thermal expansion rates of the silicon and

the ceramic would cause the structure to break during the cycles of

extreme changes in temperature that Telstar would pass through. We

remedied this by connecting each cell to the ceramic support by a thin

U-shaped strip of silver (_see above_). Since silver has a much higher

thermal expansion coefficient than silicon, we added tiny sandwiches of

Nilvar or Invar (36% nickel, 64% iron) where the cells were attached.

With this mounting method, the cell modules withstood thermal and

mechanical shocks much more severe than those they would undergo in

actual use. In one test, for instance, an entire cell module with its

cover plates was first dipped in hot water, then plunged into liquid

nitrogen at a temperature of -195° Centigrade. In orbit, the temperature

range for the satellite was not expected to be more than from +80° to

-100°C, with a rate of change of no more than three degrees a minute.

Finally, we needed to find the right kind of transparent protective

cover for the Telstar solar cells, both to keep micrometeorites from

damaging the sensitive and very thin diffused layer and to slow down the

incoming electrons to nondestructive energy levels. For micrometeorite

protection, only a thin layer of hard transparent substance was needed;

for electron protection, the cover plates should have a mass of no less

than 0.3 gram per square centimeter (as we explained above). And there

were two other important considerations: The material we used should not

be darkened or discolored by prolonged exposure to ultraviolet

radiation, and it should have good thermal conductance, so that some of

the heat absorbed by the solar cells could be conducted out to the cover

plates and re-radiated. All these requirements led us to the choice of

clear, man-made sapphire. Although sapphire is more expensive and

difficult to make than the equivalent quartz or glass, it only has to be

30 mils (three hundreds of an inch) thick. Twice this thickness would be

required if quartz or glass were used.

We have had space to describe only a few of the things involved in

designing a solar cell power plant that would work unattended out in

space. We have not mentioned a good many of the tough problems that had

to be worked on. But we are glad to report that we could find answers to

almost all our questions. And the most significant answer is shown in

_the figure below_, where you can see how the Telstar I solar power

plant slowly diminished in power almost exactly as we predicted it

would.

[Illustration: _Very gradual decay due to radiation effects of the

Telstar I solar cell plant in the first months after the satellite

went into orbit; it was extremely close to the predicted rate (solid

line)._]

Kenneth D. Smith _was born in Galesburg, Illinois, and received a B.A.

from Pomona College in 1928 and an M.A. from Dartmouth College in

1930. He joined Bell Telephone Laboratories in 1930, and has worked on

the development of proximity fuzes, radar bombing systems, broadband

microwave radio systems, and various semiconductor devices, including

radiation-resistant solar cells for the Telstar satellite._

CASE HISTORY NO. 5

Would Time Delay Be a Problem in Using a Synchronous Satellite?

Peter D. Bricker

_Psychologist—Member of Staff, Behavioral Research Laboratory_

Satellite Communications Physics · 第 47 / 75 题