CHAPTER XVI

In Which John Rodney Is Convinced

Once more, as Thorndyke concluded, there was a long, uncomfortable

silence, during which the two brothers cogitated profoundly and with a

very disturbed expression. At length Rodney spoke.

“There is no denying, Thorndyke, that the body of circumstantial

evidence that you have produced, and expounded so skilfully and

lucidly, is extraordinarily complete. Of course it is subject to your

being able to prove that Varney’s reports as to Purcell’s appearance

at Falmouth and Ipswich were false reports and that the letters which

purported to be written and sent by Purcell were in fact not written

or sent by him. If you can prove those assertions there will

undoubtedly be a very formidable case against Varney, because those

reports and those letters would then be evidence that some one was

endeavouring to prove—falsely—that Purcell is alive. But this would

amount to presumptive evidence that he is not alive and that some one

has reasons for concealing the fact of his death. But we must look to

you to prove what you have asserted. You could hardly suggest that we

should charge a highly respectable gentleman of our acquaintance with

having murdered his friend and made away with the body—for that is

obviously your meaning—on a mass of circumstantial evidence which is,

you must admit, rather highly theoretical.”

“I agree with you completely,” replied Thorndyke. “The evidence

respecting the reports and the letters is obviously essential. But in

the meantime it is of the first importance that we carry this

investigation to an absolute finish. It is not merely a question of

justice or our duty on grounds of public policy to uncover a crime and

secure the punishment of the criminal. There are individual rights and

interests to be guarded; those, I mean, of the missing man’s wife. If

her husband is dead, common justice to her demands that his death

should be proved and placed on public record.”

“Yes, indeed!” Rodney agreed, heartily. “If Purcell is dead, then she

is a widow and the petition becomes unnecessary. By the way, I

understand now why you were always so set against the private

detective; but what I don’t understand is why you put in that

advertisement.”

“It is quite simple,” was the reply. “I wanted another forged letter,

written in terms dictated by myself—and I got it.”

“Ha!” exclaimed Rodney. And now, for the first time, he began to

understand how Thorndyke had got his great reputation.

“You spoke just now,” Rodney continued, “of carrying this

investigation to a finish. Haven’t you done so? Is there anything more

to investigate?”

“We have not yet completed our examination of the yacht,” replied

Thorndyke. “The facts that we have elicited enable us to make certain

inferences concerning the circumstances of Purcell’s death—assuming

his death to have occurred. We infer, for instance, that he did not

fall overboard, nor was he pushed overboard. He met his death on the

yacht and it was his dead body which was cast into the sea with the

sinker attached to it. That we may fairly infer. But we have, at

present, no evidence as to the way in which he came by his death.

Possibly a further examination of the yacht may show some traces from

which we may form an opinion. By the way, I have been looking at that

revolver that is hanging from the beam. Was that on board at the

time?”

“Yes,” answered Rodney. “It was hanging on the cabin bulkhead. Be

careful,” he added, as Thorndyke lifted it from its hook. “I don’t

think it has been unloaded.”

Thorndyke opened the breech of the revolver, and, turning out the

cartridges into his hand, peered down the barrel and into each chamber

separately. Then he looked at the cartridges in his hand.

“This seems a little odd,” he remarked. “The barrel is quite clean and

so is one chamber, but the other five chambers are extremely foul. And

I notice that the cartridges are not all alike. There are five Eleys

and one Curtis and Harvey. That is quite a suggestive coincidence.”

Phillip looked with a distinctly startled expression at the little

heap of cartridges in Thorndyke’s hand, and, picking out the odd one,

examined it with knitted brows.

“When did you fire the revolver last, Jack?” he asked, looking up at

his brother.

“On the day when we potted at those champagne bottles,” was the reply.

Phillip raised his eyebrows. “Then,” said he, “this is a very

remarkable affair. I distinctly remember on that occasion, when we had

sunk all the bottles, reloading the revolver with Eleys, and that

there were then three cartridges left over in the bag. When I had

loaded, I opened the new box of Curtis and Harveys, tipped them into

the bag and threw the box overboard.”

“Did you clean the revolver?” asked Thorndyke.

“No, I didn’t. I meant to clean it later, but forgot to.”

“But,” said Thorndyke, “it has undoubtedly been cleaned, and very

thoroughly as to the barrel and one chamber. Shall we check the

cartridges in the bag? There ought to be forty-nine Curtis and Harveys

and three Eleys if what you have told us is correct.”

Phillip searched among the raffle on the bench and presently unearthed

a small linen bag. Untying the string, he shot out on the bench a heap

of cartridges which he counted one by one. There were fifty-two in

all, and three of them were Eleys.

“Then,” said Thorndyke, “it comes to this: since you used that

revolver it has been used by some one else. That some one fired only a

single shot, after which he carefully cleaned the barrel and the empty

chamber and reloaded. Incidentally, he seems to have known where the

cartridge bag was kept, but he did not know about the change in the

make of cartridges or that the revolver had not been cleaned. You

notice, Rodney,” he added, “that the circumstantial evidence

accumulates.”

“I do, indeed,” Rodney replied, gloomily. “Is there anything else that

you wish to examine?”

“Yes. There is the sail. Phillip mentioned a stain on the jib. Shall

we see if we can make anything of that?”

“I don’t think you will make much of it,” said Phillip. “It is very

faint. However, you shall see it and judge for yourself.” He picked

out one of the bundles of white duck, and, while he was unfolding it,

Thorndyke dragged an empty bench into the middle of the floor under

the skylight. Over this the sail was spread so that the mysterious

mark was in the middle of the bench. It was very inconspicuous; just a

faint grey-green, wavy line like the representation of an island on a

map. The three men looked at it curiously for a few moments; then

Thorndyke asked: “Would you mind if I made a further stain on the

sail? I should like to apply some reagents.”

“Of course you must do what is necessary,” said Rodney. “The evidence

is more important than the sail.”

On this Thorndyke opened his research case and brought forth the two

bottles that Polton had procured from the Borough; of which one was

labelled “Tinct. Guiaci Dil.” and the other “Æther Ozon.” As they

emerged from the case Phillip read the labels with evident surprise,

remarking:

“I shouldn’t have thought that the guiacum test would be of any use

after all these months, especially as the sail seems to have been

scrubbed.”

“It will act, I think, if the pigment or its derivatives are there,”

said Thorndyke; and, as he spoke, he poured a quantity of the tincture

on the middle of the stained area. The pool of liquid rapidly spread

considerably beyond the limits of the stain, growing paler as it

extended. Then Thorndyke cautiously dropped small quantities of the

ozonic ether at various points around the stained area and watched

closely as the two liquids mingled in the fabric of the sail.

Gradually the ether spread towards the stain, and, first at one point

and then at another, approached and finally crossed the wavy grey

line; and at each point the same change occurred: first the faint grey

line turned into a strong blue line and then the colour extended to

the enclosed space until the entire area of the stain stood out a

conspicuous blue patch. Phillip and Thorndyke looked at one another

significantly and the latter said: “You understand the meaning of this

reaction, Rodney; this is a blood stain; and a very carefully washed

blood stain.”

“So I supposed,” Rodney replied; and for a while no one spoke.

There was something very dramatic and solemn, they all felt, in the

sudden appearance of this staring blue patch on the sail with the

sinister message that it brought. But what followed was more dramatic

still. As they stood silently regarding the blue stain, the mingled

liquids continued to spread; and suddenly, at the extreme edge of the

wet area, they became aware of a new spot of blue. At first a mere

speck, it grew slowly, as the liquid spread over the canvas, into a

small oval, and then a second spot appeared by its side. At this point

Thorndyke poured out a fresh charge of the tincture, and when it had

soaked into the cloth, cautiously applied a sprinkling of ether.

Instantly the blue spots began to elongate; fresh spots and patches

appeared, and as they ran together there sprang out of the blank

surface the clear impression of a hand—a left hand, complete in all

its details excepting the third finger, which was represented by a

round spot at some two thirds of its length.

The dreadful significance of this apparition and the uncanny and

mysterious manner of its emergence from the white surface produced a

most profound impression on all the observers, but especially on

Rodney, who stared at it with an expression of the utmost horror, but

spoke not a word. His brother was hardly less appalled, and when he at

length spoke it was in a hushed voice that was little above a whisper.

“It is horrible!” he murmured. “It seems almost supernatural, that

accusing hand springing into existence out of the blank surface after

all this time. I wonder,” he added after a pause, “why the third

finger made no mark, seeing that the others are so distinct.”

“I think,” said Thorndyke, “that the impression is there. That small

round spot looks like the mark of a finger-tip, and its position

rather suggests a finger with a stiff joint.”

As he made this statement, both brothers simultaneously uttered a

smothered exclamation.

“It is Varney’s hand!” gasped Phillip. “You recognize it, Jack, don’t

you? That is just where the tip of his stiff finger would come. Have

you ever noticed Varney’s left hand, Thorndyke?”

“You mean the ankylosed third finger? Yes; and I agree with you that

this is undoubtedly the print of Varney’s hand.”

“Then,” said Rodney, “the case is complete. There is no need for any

further investigation. On the evidence that is before us, to say

nothing of the additional evidence that you can produce, there cannot

be the shadow of a doubt that Purcell was murdered by Varney and his

body sunk in the sea. You agree with me, I am sure, Thorndyke?”

“Certainly,” was the reply. “I consider the evidence so far conclusive

that I have not the slightest doubt on the subject.”

“Very well,” said Rodney. “Then the next question is, what is to be

done? Shall I lay a sworn information, or will you? Or had we better

go to the police together and make a joint statement?”

“Whatever we do,” replied Thorndyke, “don’t let us be premature. The

evidence, as you say, is perfectly convincing. It leaves us with no

doubt as to what happened on that day last June. It would probably be,

in an intellectual sense, quite convincing to a judge. It might even

be to a jury. But would it be sufficient to secure a conviction? I

think it extremely doubtful.”

“Do you really?” exclaimed Phillip. “I should have thought it

impossible that any one who had heard the evidence could fail to come

to the inevitable conclusion.”

“You are probably right,” said Thorndyke. “But a jury who are trying

an accused person on a capital charge have got to arrive at something

more than a belief that the accused is guilty. They have got to be

convinced that there is, humanly speaking, no possible doubt as to the

prisoner’s guilt. No jury would give an adverse verdict on a balance

of probabilities, nor would any judge encourage them to do so.”

“But surely,” said Phillip, “this is something more than a mere

balance of probabilities. The evidence all points in the same

direction and there is nothing to suggest a contrary conclusion.”

Thorndyke smiled drily. “You might think differently after you have

heard a capable counsel for the defence. But the position is this: we

are dealing with a charge of murder. Now in order to prove that a

particular person is guilty of murder it is necessary first to

establish the _corpus delicti_, as the phrase goes; that is, to prove

that a murder has been committed by some one. But the proof that a

person has been murdered involves the antecedent proof that he is

dead. If there is any doubt that the alleged deceased is dead, no

murder charge can be sustained. But proof of death usually involves

the production of the body or of some identifiable part of it, or, at

least, the evidence of some person who has seen it and can swear to

its identity. There are exceptional cases, of course, and this might

be accepted as one. But you can take it that the inability of the

prosecution to produce the body or any part of it, or any witness who

can testify to having seen it, or any direct evidence that the person

alleged to have been murdered is actually dead, would make it

extremely difficult to secure the conviction of the accused.”

“Yes, I see that,” said Phillip. “But, after all, that is not our

concern. If we give the authorities all the information that we

possess, we shall have done our duty as citizens. As to the rest, we

must leave the Court to convict or acquit according to its judgment.”

“Not at all,” Thorndyke dissented. “You are losing sight of our

position in the case. There are two different issues, which are,

however, inseparably connected. One is the fact of Purcell’s death;

the other is Varney’s part in compassing it. Now it is the first issue

that concerns us; or, at least, concerns me. If we could prove that

Purcell is dead without bringing Varney into it at all, I should be

willing to do so; for I strongly suspect that there were extenuating

circumstances.”

“So do I,” said Rodney. “Purcell was a brute, whereas Varney has

always seemed to be a perfectly decent, gentlemanly fellow.”

“That is the impression that I have received,” said Thorndyke, “and I

feel no satisfaction in proceeding against Varney. My purpose, all

along, has been, not to convict Varney but to prove that Purcell is

dead. And that is what we have to do now, for Margaret Purcell’s sake.

But we cannot leave Varney out of the case. For if Purcell is dead, he

is dead because Varney killed him; and our only means of proving his

death is to charge Varney with having murdered him. But if we charge

Varney, we must secure a conviction. We cannot afford to fail. If the

Court is convinced that Purcell is dead, it will convict Varney; for

the evidence of his death is evidence of his murder; but if the Court

acquits Varney, it can do so only on the ground that there is no

conclusive evidence that Purcell is dead. Varney’s acquittal would

therefore leave Margaret Purcell still bound by law to a hypothetical

husband, with the insecure chance of obtaining her release at some

future time either by divorce or presumption of death. That would not

be fair to her. She is a widow and she is entitled to have her status

acknowledged.”

Rodney nodded gloomily. A consciousness of what he stood to gain by

Varney’s conviction lent an uncomfortable significance to Thorndyke’s

words.

“Yes,” he agreed, half reluctantly, “there is no denying the truth of

what you say, but I wish it might have been the other way about. If

Purcell had murdered Varney I could have raised the hue and cry with a

good deal more enthusiasm. I knew both the men well, and I liked

Varney but detested Purcell. Still, one has to accept the facts.”

“Exactly,” said Thorndyke, who had realized and sympathized with

Rodney’s qualms. “The position is not of our creating; and whatever

our private sentiments may be, the fact remains that a man who elects

to take the life of another must accept the consequences. That is

Varney’s position so far as we can see; and if he is innocent it is

for him to clear himself.”

“Yes, of course,” Rodney agreed; “but I wish the accusation had come

through different channels.”

“So do I,” said Phillip. “It is horrible to have to denounce a man

with whom one has been on terms of intimate friendship. But apparently

Thorndyke considers that we should not denounce him at present. That

is what I don’t quite understand. You seemed to imply, Thorndyke, that

the case was not complete enough to warrant our taking action, and

that some further evidence ought to be obtained in order to make sure

of a conviction. But what further evidence is it possible to obtain?”

“My feeling,” replied Thorndyke, “is that the case is at present, as

your brother expressed it just now, somewhat theoretical—or rather

hypothetical. The evidence is circumstantial from beginning to end.

There is not a single item of direct evidence to furnish a

starting-point. It would be insisted by the defence that Purcell’s

death is a matter of mere inference and that you cannot convict a man

of the murder of another who may conceivably be still alive. We ought,

if possible, to put Purcell’s death on the basis of demonstrable

fact.”

“But how is that possible?” demanded Phillip.

“The conclusive method of proving the death of a person is, as I have

said, to produce that person’s body, or some recognizable part of it.”

“But Purcell’s body is at the bottom of the sea!”

“True. But we know its whereabouts. It is a small area, with the

lighthouse as a landmark. If that area were systematically worked over

with a trawl or dredge, or, better still, with a set of creepers

attached to a good-sized spar, there should be a very fair chance of

recovering the body, or, at least, the clothing and the weight.”

Phillip reflected for a few moments. “I think you are right,” he said,

at length. “The body appears, from what you say, to be quite close to

the Wolf Rock, and almost certainly on the east side. With a good

compass and the lighthouse as a sailing mark, it would be possible to

ply up and down and search every inch of the bottom in the

neighbourhood of the rock.”

“There is only one difficulty,” said Rodney. “Your worm-tube was

composed entirely of fragments of the rock. But how large an area of

the sea-bottom is covered with those fragments? We should have to

ascertain that if we are to work over the whole of it.”

“It would not be difficult to ascertain,” replied Thorndyke. “If we

take soundings with a hand-lead as we approach the rock, the samples

that come up on the arming of the lead will tell us when we are over a

bottom covered with phonolite debris.”

“Yes,” Rodney agreed, “that will answer if the depth is within the

range of a hand-lead. If it isn’t we shall have to rig the tackle for

a deep-sea lead. It will be rather a gruesome quest. Do I gather that

you are prepared to come down with us and lend a hand? I hope you

are.”

“So do I!” exclaimed Phillip. “We shall be quite at home with the

navigation, but if—er—if anything comes up on the creepers, it will be

a good deal more in your line than ours.”

“I should certainly wish to come,” said Thorndyke, “and, in fact, I

think it rather desirable that I should, as Phillip suggests. But I

can’t get away from town just at present, nor, I imagine, can you. We

had better postpone the expedition for a week or so until the

commencement of the spring vacation. That will give us time to make

the necessary arrangements, to charter a suitable boat and so forth.

And in any case we shall have to pick our weather, having regard to

the sort of sea that one may encounter in the neighbourhood of the

Wolf.”

“Yes,” agreed Phillip, “it will have to be a reasonably calm day when

we make the attempt; so I suggest that we put it off until you and

Jack are free; and meanwhile I will get on with the preliminary

arrangements, the hiring of the boat and getting together the

necessary gear.”

While they had been talking, the evening had closed in and the

workshop was now almost in darkness. It being too late for the

brothers to carry out the business that had brought them to the wharf,

even if they had been in a state of mind suitable to the checking of

inventories, they postponed the survey to a later date, locked up the

workshop, and, in company with Thorndyke, made their way homeward.

The shadow of the Wolf · 第 16 / 17 章