THEODORE BLAND.

DEAR VICAR,--I have your letter and quite agree as to the

advisability of starting some society for working off the latent

energy which has accumulated since the demise of the War and the

consequent closing down of War activities. I do not however fancy

Philately as a safety-valve. I suppose one _could_ stand up to

stick stamps in a book, and would get a certain amount of physical

exercise in going about swapping duds and duplicates, but generally

speaking it is a sedentary occupation and, to my mind, a selfish

one.

As you ask for a suggestion from me, I propose an Archaeological

Society. The pursuit of Archaeology has this advantage: it connotes

digging, an aptitude for which has been distinctly fostered here by

the allotment habit.

As for our objective, without going further than Filby there is the

alleged tunnel leading from the ruins of the nunnery to no one

knows where. It would be interesting to know whether the

thirteenth-century Lord of Filby had a private way (on the score of

feudalities) to the Ursuline convent, or whether the good nuns had a

back-way to the Old Swan for the conveyance of mead, sack and such

other strong waters as the times and licensing laws afforded.

But perhaps the tunnel, like most things, is controlled, and a

_mandamus_ (which, I take it, is a kind of ecclesiastical coupon)

would be required before we could touch it.

Of course there are a mound and the foundations of an old wall in

my paddock which the Society are welcome to tackle. Don't you think

they would do to begin on?

Yours sincerely,

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, June 18, 1919 · 第 18 / 45 题