WHAT MAY WE EXPECT OF IT.

Let us take the steam engine, and see what we are now doing by

luminous combustion. Good Pittsburg coal contains 87 per cent. of

carbon, 5 per cent. of hydrogen, 2 per cent. of oxygen and 6 per cent.

of ash; we therefore have in one pound of such coal:

8,080 × 9 14,544 × 87

--------- = ----------- = 12,653 units in carbon.

5 100

34,662 × 9 62,391 × 5 3,119 units in hydrogen.

---------- = ---------- = ------

5 100 15,772 units in coal.

15,772 × 772[2] = 12,175,984 foot pounds of energy is occluded in the

static caloric contained in one pound of such coal.

[Footnote 2: Dr. Joule--foot pounds in one unit.]

A horse-power is estimated as capable of raising 33,000 pounds one

foot high per minute, and for this reason it is termed 33,000 foot

pounds per minute. So we have 33,000 × 60 = 1,980,000 foot pounds per

hour, as a horse-power.

The best class of _compound condensing_ engines,[3] with all the

modern improvements, require 1.828 pounds of coal per 1 h.p. per hour.

Thus we have--

12,175,984 × 1.828 .................22,257,699

Foot pounds in one h.p. .............1,980,000

----------

Foot pounds lost per h.p. ..........20,277,699

Per cent utilized per h.p. ..............8.94

Per cent lost per h.p. .................91.06

------

100.00

[Footnote 3: "American Engineer," Vol. II., No. 10, page 182.]

In the ordinary practice of stationary non-condensing engines, from

three to four pounds of coal are required per horse-power per hour.

Now, taking the best of this class at 3 pounds, we have--

12,175,984 × 3 = 36,527,952

One h.p. 1,980,000

----------

Loss per h.p. 34,547,952

Per cent utilized per h.p. 5.42

Per cent lost per h.p. 94.58

------

100.00

From these facts it may be assumed that after making due allowance for

variable qualities of the coal, the steam engine process, as at

present practiced, will not utilize more than from 5 to 10 per cent.

of the energy contained in the fuel used. It will thus be seen that

the process of converting static to dynamic caloric by luminous

combustion, by means of the steam engine, is an exceedingly wasteful

and costly method, and leaves much room for economy.

Taking an ordinary grade of petroleum as consisting of 13 per cent.

hydrogen, 78 carbon, 6 oxygen, 3 nitrogen and ash, we have as its

energy in foot pounds per pound of oil--

62,391 × 13 }

----------- = 8,110 H. }

100 }

} 19,454 units.

14,544 × 78 }

----------- = 11,344 C. }

100 }

19,454 × 772 = 15,018,488 foot pounds. Thus, while our best coal

contains twelve million, the petroleum contains fifteen million foot

pounds of occluded energy in each pound, which is equal to 118,000,000

foot pounds, or 60 horse power for one hour, from one gallon of such

oil.

At present electricity is generated by two methods, and both of these

are _second powers_. Metals are smelted by luminous combustion as a

first power, and then oxidized by non-luminous combustion as a _second

power_, and coal is consumed by luminous combustion, by which steam is

generated as a first power, to drive a dynamo-generator whereby

electricity is obtained as a _second power_. Now, of the two methods,

the latter is much the cheaper, and as I have shown that the best

compound condensing engines only utilize 8.94, and a fair average

single cylinder condensing engine only utilizes 5.42 per cent. of the

energy of the fuel consumed, and as at the best not over 70 per cent.

of the foot pounds obtained from the engine can be utilized as

electricity, from which we must deduct loss by friction, etc., it will

be readily seen that not more than 5 per cent. of the energy of the

fuel can be developed by the dynamo-generator as electricity by the

present method.

The great want of the present age is a process by which the static

caloric of carbon or a hydrocarbon maybe set free by non-luminous

combustion; or, in other words, a process by which coal or oil may be

oxidized at a low degree, within an insulated vessel; if this can be

accomplished (and I can see no reason why we should not look for such

invention), we would be able to produce from twelve to fifteen million

foot pounds of energy (electricity) from one pound of petroleum, or

from ten to twelve million foot pounds from one pound of good coal,

which would be a saving of from 90 to 95 per cent. of present cost,

and leave the steam engine for historical remembrance.

Electricity may be generated by water or wind power to great

advantage, and conveyed to a distance for motive power. The

practicability of generating electricity at Niagara by which to propel

trains to New York and return may be considered almost settled; and I

conceive a second invention of importance which is now needed is an

apparatus by which the rising and falling tides may be utilized for

driving dynamo machines, by which electricity may be generated for

lighting the coast cities, and it is not unreasonable to expect that

such an apparatus will soon be provided; and in such an event gas

companies would suffer.

It is a well known fact among electricians that the volume and tension

of electricity vary both in the earth and in the atmosphere at

different sections of the earth's surface, and I conceive that we may

yet find means of utilizing this differential tension of electricity;

indeed, it is reported that during a recent storm the wires of an

ocean cable were grounded at both ends and a sufficient current for

all practical purpose flowed from the European to the American

continent, with all batteries removed, showing that the tension was so

much greater in Europe as to cause the electricity to flow through the

copper cable to this side in preference to passing through the earth

or the sea. It is also said that during an east-going storm it was

found impossible to work the telegraph lines between New York and

Buffalo, but on taking off the batteries at both ends and looping the

ends of the wire in the air, that a constant current of electricity

passed from Buffalo to New York, and the line was kept in constant use

in that direction without any battery connection until the storm

abated. Now, how far or to what advantage we may be able to utilize

this differential tension of electricity in the earth and the air, we

cannot now say; but I think that we may justly look for valuable

developments in this direction.

If, as I verily believe, a process will soon be discovered by which

dynamic caloric can be produced by the oxidation of petroleum with

non-luminous combustion in an insulated chamber, as we now oxidize

zinc, electricity will then be obtained from so small a weight, and at

such a low cost, as to insure aerial navigation beyond a doubt. Not

with balloons and their cumbrous inflations, but with machines capable

of carrying the load, and traveling by displacement of the air at high

velocities. Therefore we may expect that aerial navigation will be

developed in the near future to be one of the greatest enterprises of

the world.

And lastly, will it pay to use luminous combustion as a first power

for generating dynamic caloric for use as a second power, as is now

practiced?

At the University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia, gas is consumed in

an Otto gas engine, which drives a Gramme generator; and the lecture

room is lighted with electricity, and I am informed that the light is

both better _and cheaper_ than when they used the gas in the ordinary

gas burners. Hence we may expect to see gas consumed to advantage for

producing electric lights.

Considering the difficulties of transmitting steam power to a

considerable distance, and the comparative great cost of running small

engines, it is more than likely that electricity as at present

generated will be found to be economical for driving small motors.

Having thus endeavored to explain what electricity is, and the laws

which govern the occlusion of static caloric, and the development of

dynamic caloric (electricity), in conclusion I call the attention of

the inventors of the age to the great need of a process for oxidizing

coal or oil at a low degree, within an insulated vessel. With such an

invention electricity would be obtained at such a low cost that it

would be used exclusively to light and heat our houses, to smelt,

refine, and manipulate our metals, to propel our cars, wagons,

carriages, and ships, cook our food, and drive all machinery requiring

motive power.

* * * * *

Scientific American Supplement, No. 312, December 24, 1881 · 第 54 / 76 题