THE MANUFACTURE OF IRON AND STEEL.

In 1831, Neilson's hot blast specification had been published for two

and a half years only. The Butterly Company had tried the hot blast

for the first time in the November preceding the meeting of the

British Association. The heating of the blast was coming very slowly

into use, and the temperature attained when it was employed was only

some 600 degrees. The ordinary blast furnace of those days was 35 to

40 feet high, and about 12 feet diameter at the boshes, and turned out

about 60 tons a week. It used about 2½ tons of coal per ton of iron,

and no attempt was made to utilize the waste gases, whether escaping

in the form of gas or in the form of flame, the country being

illuminated for miles around at night by these fires. The furnaces

were also open at the hearth, and continuous fire poured out along

with the slag.

In 1881, blast furnaces are from 90 ft. to 100 ft. high, and 25 ft. in

diameter at the boshes; they turn out from 500 to 800 tons a week. The

tops and also the hearths are closed, and the blast--thanks to the use

of Mr. E.A. Cowper's stoves--is at 1,200 degrees. The manufacture of

iron has also now enlisted in its service the chemist as well as the

engineer, and among those who have done much for the improvement of

the blast furnaces, to no one is greater praise due than to Mr. Isaac

Lowthian Bell, who has brought the manufacture of iron to the position

of a highly scientific operation. In the production of wrought iron by

the puddling process, and in the subsequent mill operations, there is

no very considerable change, except in the magnitude of the machines

employed, and, in the greater rapidity with which they now run. In

saying this, I am not forgetting the various "mechanical puddlers"

which have been put to work, nor the attempts that have been made by

the use of some of them to make wrought iron direct from the ore; but

neither the "mechanical puddler" nor the "direct process" has yet come

into general use; and I desire to be taken as speaking of that which

is the ordinary process pursued at the present in puddled iron

manufactures. In 1831, a few hundredweights was the limit of weight of

a plate, while in 1881, there may readily be obtained, for

boiler-making purposes, plates of at least four times the weight of

those that were made in 1831. I may, perhaps, be allowed to say that

there is an extremely interesting blue-book of the year 1818,

containing the report of a parliamentary committee which sat on boiler

explosions, and I recommend any mechanical engineer who is interested

in the history of the subject to read that book; he will find it there

stated that in the North of England there was a species of engines

called locomotives, the boilers of which were made of wrought iron,

beaten, not rolled, because the rolled plate was not considered fit;

it was added that if made of beaten iron the boiler would last at

least a year.

In 1831, thirteen years later, the dimensions of rolled plates were no

doubt raised; but few then would have supposed it possible there

should be rolled such plates as are now produced for boiler purposes,

and still fewer would have believed that in the year 1881 we should

make, for warlike purposes, rolled plates 22 inches in thickness and

30 tons in weight. I have said there is very little alteration in the

process of making wrought iron by puddling, and I do not think there

is likely to be much further, if any, improvement in this process,

because I believe that, with certain exceptions, the manufacture of

iron by puddling is a doomed industry. I ventured to say, in a lecture

I delivered at the Royal Institution three years ago on "The Future of

Steel," that I believed puddled iron, except for the mere hand wrought

forge purposes of the country blacksmith, and for such like purposes,

would soon become a thing of the past. Mr. Harrison, the engineer of

the North-Eastern Railway, told me that about eighteen months ago the

North-Eastern Railway applied for tenders for rails in any quantities

between 2,000 and 10,000 tons, and they issued alternative

specifications for iron and for steel. They received about ten

tenders. Some did not care to tender for iron at all; but when they

did tender alternatively, the price quoted for the iron was greater

than for the steel. I have no doubt whatever that, in a short time, it

will be practically impossible to procure iron made by the puddling

process, of dimensions fit for many of the purposes for which a few

years ago it alone was used.

With respect to steel, in 1831 the process in use was that of

cementation, producing blistered steel, which was either piled and

welded to make shear steel, or was broken into small pieces, melted in

pots, and run into an ingot weighing only some 50 lb. or 60 lb. At

that time steel was dealt in by the pound; nobody thought of steel in

tons. In 1881, we are all aware that, by Sir Henry Bessemer's

well-known discovery, carried out by him with such persistent vigor,

cast iron is, by the blowing process, converted into steel, and that

of Dr. Siemens' equally well-known process (now that, owing to his

invention of the regenerative furnace, it is possible to obtain the

necessary high temperature), steel is made upon the open hearth. We

are, moreover, aware that, by both of these processes, steel is

produced in quantities of many tons at a single operation, with the

result that as instanced in the case of the North-Eastern rails, steel

is a cheaper material than the wrought iron made by the puddling

process. One cannot pass away from the steel manufacture without

alluding to Sir Joseph Whitworth's process of putting a pressure on

the steel while in a tried state. By this means, the cavities which

are frequently to be found in the ingot of a large size are, while the

steel is fluid, rendered considerably smaller, and the steel is

thereby rendered much more sound. In conclusion of my observations on

the subject of iron and steel manufacture, I wish to call attention to

the invention of Messrs. Thomas & Gilchrist, by which ores of iron,

containing impurities that unfitted them to be used in the manufacture

of steel, are now freed from these impurities, and are thus brought

into use for steel-making purposes.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 312, December 24, 1881 · 第 38 / 76 题