Before 1789, in France, this enterprise, although largely trammeled and

impeded by the State and the Church, was not violated in principle nor

perverted in essence; still at the present day, in Germany, in England,

in the United States, it exists and is developed in accordance with its

nature. It is admitted to be a private enterprise,[6348] the collective

and spontaneous work of several associates voluntarily bound together,

old founders, actual and future benefactors, masters and parents and

even scholars,[6349] each in his place and function, under a statute

and according to tradition, in such a way as to continue functioning

indefinitely, in order to provide, like a gas company on its own

responsibility, at its own risk and expense, a provider of services for

those who want it; in other terms, the school enterprise must, like any

other undertaking, render acceptable what it offers thereby satisfying

the needs of its clients.--Naturally, it adapts itself to these needs;

its directors and those concerned do what is necessary. With hands free,

and grouped around an important interest evidently for a common purpose,

mutually bound and veritable associates not only legally but in feeling,

devoted to a local enterprise and local residents for many years, often

even for life, they strive not to offend the profound repugnance of the

young and of families. They therefore make the necessary arrangements

internally and with the parents.[6350]

That is why, outside of France, the French internat, so artificial,

so forced, so exaggerated, is almost unknown. In Germany, out of one

hundred pupils in the gymnases, which correspond to our lycées, there

are scarcely ten boarders lodged and fed in the gymnase; the rest, even

when their parents do not live near by, remain day-scholars, private

guests in the families that harbor them, often at a very low price and

which take the place of the absent family. No boarders are found in

them except in a few gymnases like Pforta and by virtue of an ancient

endowment. The number, however, by virtue of the same endowment, is

limited; they dine, in groups of eight or ten,[6351] at the same table

with the professors lodged like themselves in the establishment,

while they enjoy for a playground a vast domain of woods, fields and

meadow.--The same in England, at Harrow, Eton and Rugby. Each professor,

here, is keeper of a boarding-house; he has ten, twenty and thirty boys

under his roof, eating at his table or at a table the head of which is

some lady of the house. Thus, the youth goes from the family into the

school, without painful or sudden contrast, and remains under a

system of things which suits his age and which is a continuation, only

enlarged, of domestic life.[6352]

The French college or lycée is quite the opposite. It operates against

the true spirit of the school, and has done so for eighty years being an

enterprise of the State, a local extension of a central enterprise, one

of the hundred branches of the great State university trunk, possessing

no roots of its own and with a directing or teaching staff composed

of functionaries similar to others, that is to say transferable,[6353]

restless and preoccupied with promotion, their principal motive for

doing well being the hope of a higher rank and of getting a better

situation. This almost separate them in advance from the establishment

in which they labor and,[6354] besides that, they are led, pushed on,

and restrained from above, each in his own particular sphere and in

his limited duty. The principal (proviseur) is confined to his

administrative position and the professor to his class, expressly

forbidden to leave it. No professor is "under any pretext to receive in

his house as boarders or day-scholars more than ten pupils."[6355]

No woman is allowed to lodge inside the lycée or college walls,

all,--proviseur, censor, cashier, chaplain, head-masters and assistants,

fitted by art or force to each other like cog-wheels, with no deep

sympathy, with no moral tie, without collective interests, a cleverly

designed machine which, in general, works accurately and smoothly, but

with no soul because, to have a soul, it is of prime necessity to have

a living body. As a machine constructed at Paris according to a unique

pattern and superposed on people and things from Perpignan to Douai and

from Rochelle to Besançon, it does not adapt itself to the requirements

of the public; it subjects its public to the exigencies, rigidity and

uniformity of its play and structure. Now, as it acts mechanically only,

through outward pressure, the human material on which it operates must

be passive, composed, not of diverse persons, but of units all alike;

its pupils must be for it merely numbers and names.--Owing to this our

internats, those huge stone boxes set up and isolated in each large

town, those lycées parceled out to hold three hundred, four hundred,

even eight hundred boarders, with immense dormitories, refectories and

playgrounds, recitation-rooms full to overflowing, and, for eight or ten

years, for one half of our children and youths, an anti-social unnatural

system apart, strict confinement, no going out except to march in

couples under the eyes of a sub-teacher who maintains order in the

ranks, promiscuity and life in common, exact and minute regularity under

equal discipline and constant constraint in order to eat, sleep, study,

play, promenade and the rest,--in short, COMMUNISM.

From the University this system is propagated among its rivals. In

conferring grades and passing examinations, it arranges and overburdens

the school program of study; hence, it incites in others what it

practices at home, the over-training of youth, and a factitious,

hot-house education. On the other hand, the internat is, for those who

decide on that, less troublesome than the day-school;[6356] also,

the more numerous the boarders in any one establishment, the less

the expense; thus, in order to exist in the face of the university

establishments, there must be internats and internats that are full.

Ecclesiastical establishments willingly resign themselves to all this;

they are even inclined that way; the Jesuits were the first ones, under

the old monarchy, who introduced cloistered and crowded boarding-houses.

In its essence, the Catholic church, like the French State, is a Roman

institution, still more exclusive and more governmental, resolved to

seize, hold on to, direct and control man entirely, and, first of all,

the child, head and heart, opinions and impressions, in order to stamp

in him and lastingly the definitive and salutary forms which are for him

the first condition of salvation. Consequently, the ecclesiastical cage

is more strict in its confinement than the secular cage; if the bars are

not so strong and not so rough, the grating, finer and more yielding, is

more secure, closer and better maintained; they do not allow any holes

or relaxation of the meshes; the precautions against worldly and family

interference, against the mistakes and caprices of individual effort,

are innumerable, and form a double or even triple network. For, to

school discipline is added religious discipline, no less compulsory,

just as rigid and more constant--daily pious exercises, ordinary

devotions and extraordinary ceremonies, spiritual guidance, influence of

the confessional and the example and behavior of a staff kept together

around the same work by the same faith. The closer the atmosphere, the

more powerful the action; the chances are that the latter will prove

decisive on the child sequestered, sheltered and brought up in a retort,

and that its intellect, faith and ideas, carefully cultivated, pruned

and always under direction, will exactly reproduce the model aimed

at.--For this reason, in 1876, 33,000 out of 46,000 pupils belonging

to the 309 ecclesiastical establishments of secondary instruction, are

internes,[6357] and the Catholic authorities admit that, in the 86 small

seminaries, no day-scholars, no future lay persons, are necessary.

This conclusion is perhaps reasonable in relation to the 23,000

pupils of the small seminaries, and for the 10,000 pupils in the great

seminaries; it is perhaps reasonable also for the future military

officers formed by the State at La Flèche, Saint-Cyr, Saumur, and on the

Borda.[6358] Whether future soldiers or future priests, their education

fits them for the life they are to lead; what they are to become as

adults, they already are as youths and children; the internat, under a

convent discipline or that of the barracks, qualifies them beforehand

for their profession. Since they must possess the spirit of it they must

contract its habits. Having accepted the form of their pursuit they more

easily accept its constraints and all the more that the constraints

of the regiment will be less for the young officer who recently was at

Saint-Cyr, and for the young ministrant in the rural parish who recently

was in the great seminary.--It is quite the reverse for the 75,000 other

internes of public or private establishments, ecclesiastic or secular,

for the future engineers, doctors, architects, notaries, attorneys,

advocates and other men of the law, functionaries, land-owners, chiefs

and assistants in industry, agriculture and commerce. For them the

internat affords precisely the opposite education required for a

secular and civil career. These carry away from the prolonged internat

a sufficient supply of Latin or of mathematics; but they are lacking

in two acquisitions of capital import: they have been deprived of two

indispensable experiences. On entering society the young man is ignorant

of its two principal personages, man and woman, as they are and as he is

about to meet them in society. He has no idea of them, or rather he has

only a preconceived, arbitrary and false conception of them.--He has

not dined, commonly, with a lady, head of the house, along with her

daughters and often with other ladies; their tone of voice, their

deportment at table, their toilette, their greater reserve, the

attentions they receive, the air of politeness all around, have not

impressed on his imagination the faintest lines of an exact notion;

hence, there is something wanting in him in relation to how he

should demean himself; he does not know how to address them, feels

uncomfortable in their presence; they are strange beings to him, new,

of an unknown species.--In a like situation, at table in the evening,

he has never heard men conversing together: he has not gathered in the

thousand bits of information which a young growing mind derives from

general conversation:

* about careers in life, competition, business, money, the domestic

fireside and expenses;

* about the cost of living which should always depend on income;

* about the gain which nearly always indicates the current rates of

labor and of the social subjection one undergoes;

* about the pressing, powerful, personal interests which are soon to

seize him by the collar and perhaps by the throat;

* about the constant effort required the incessant calculation, the

daily struggle which, in modern society, makes up the life of an

ordinary man.

All means of obtaining knowledge have been denied him, the contact with

living and diverse men, the images which the sensations of his eyes and

ears might have stamped on his brain. These images constitute the sole

materials of a correct, healthy conception; through them, spontaneously

and gradually, without too many deceptions or shocks, he might

have figured social life to himself, such as it is, its conditions,

difficulties, and its opportunities: he has neither the sentiment of it

nor even a premonition. In all matters, that which we call common sense

is never but an involuntary latent summary, the lasting, substantial

and salutary depot left in our minds after many direct impressions.

With reference to social life, he has been deprived of all these direct

impressions and the precious depot has never been formed in him.--e He

has scarcely ever conversed with his professors; their talk with him has

been about impersonal and abstract matters, languages, literature and

mathematics. He has spoken but little with his teachers, except

to contest an injunction or grumble aloud against reproof. Of real

conversation, the acquisition and exchange of ideas, he has enjoyed

none, except with his comrades: if, like him, all are internes, they

can communicate to each other only their ignorance. If day-scholars are

admitted, they are active smugglers or willing agents who bring into the

house and circulate forbidden books and obscene journals, along with

the filthy provocative and foul atmosphere of the streets.--Now, with

excitement of this kind or in this manner, the brains of these captives,

as puberty comes on and deliverance draws near, work actively and we

know in what sense[6359] and in what counter-sense, how remote from

observable and positive truth, how their imagination pictures society,

man and woman, under what simple and coarse appearances, with what

inadequacy and presumption, what appetites of liberated serfs and

juvenile barbarians, how, as concerns women, their precocious and turbid

dreams first become brutal and cynical,[6360] how, as concerns men,

their unballasted and precipitous thought easily becomes chimerical

and revolutionary.[6361] The downhill road is steep on the bad side, so

that, to put on the brake and stop, then to remount the hill, the young

man who takes the management of his life into his own hands, must know

how to use his own will and persevere to the end.

But a faculty is developed only by exercise, and the French internat

is the engine the most effective for hindering the exercise of this

one.--The youth, from the first to the last day of his internat, has

never been able to deliberate on, choose and decide what he should do

at any one hour of his schooldays; except to idle away time in

study-hours, and pay no attention at recitations, he could not exercise

his will. Nearly every act, especially his outward attitudes, postures,

immobility, silence, drill and promenades in rank, is only obedience to

orders. He has lived like a horse in harness, between the shafts of his

cart; this cart itself, kept straight by its two wheels, must not leave

the rectilinear ruts hollowed out and traced for it along the road; it

is impossible for the horse to turn aside. Besides, every morning he is

harnessed at the same hour, and every evening he is unharnessed at the

same hour; every day, at other hours, he has to rest and take his ration

of hay and oats. He has never been under the necessity of thinking about

all this, nor of looking ahead or on either side; from one end of the

year to the other, he has simply had to pull along guided by the bridle

or urged by the whip, his principal motives being only of two kinds: on

the one hand more or less hard guidance and urgings, and on the other

hand his recalcitrance, laziness and fatigue; he has been obliged to

choose between the two. For eight or ten years, his initiative is

reduced to that--no other employment of his free will. The education of

his free will is thus rudimentary or nonexistent.

On the strength of this our (French) system supposes that it is complete

and perfect. We cast the bridle on the young man's neck and hand him

over to his own government. We admit that, by extraordinary grace, the

scholar has suddenly become a man; that he is capable of prescribing and

following his own orders; that he has accustomed himself to weighing the

near and remote consequences of his acts, of imputing them to himself,

of believing himself responsible for them; that his conscience, suddenly

emancipated, and his reason, suddenly adult, will march straight on

athwart temptations and immediately recover from slips. Consequently, he

is set free with an allowance in some great city; he registers himself

under some Faculty and becomes one among ten thousand other students on

the sidewalks of Paris.--Now, in France, there is no university police

force to step in, as at Bonn or Göttingen, at Oxford or Cambridge, to

watch his conduct and punish him in the domicile and in public places.

At the schools of medicine, Law, Pharmacy, Fine-Arts, Charters, and

Oriental Languages, at the Sorbonne and at the École Centrale, his

emancipation is sudden and complete. When he goes from secondary

education to superior education he does not, as in England and in

Germany, pass from restricted liberty to one less restricted, but from a

monastic discipline to compete independence. In a furnished room, in the

promiscuity and incognito of a common hotel, scarcely out of college,

the novice of twenty years finds at hand the innumerable temptations of

the streets, the taverns, the bars, public balls, obscene publications,

chance acquaintances, and the liaisons of the gutter. Against all this

his previous education has disarmed him. Instead of creating a moral

force within him, the long and strict internat has maintained moral

debility. He yields to opportunity, to example; he goes with the

current, he floats without a rudder, he lets himself drift. As far as

hygiene, or money, or sex, is concerned, his mistakes and his follies,

great or small, are almost inevitable, while it is an average chance if,

during his three, four or five years of full license, he does not become

entirely corrupt.

IV. Cramming and Exams Compared to Apprenticeship

Another vice of the system.--Starting-point of superior

instruction in France.--Substitution of special State

schools for free encyclopedic universities.--Effect of this

substitution.--Examinations and competitions.--Intense,

forced and artificial culture.--How it reaches an extreme.

--Excess and prolongation of theoretical studies.

--Insufficiency and tardiness of practical apprenticeship.

--Comparison of this system with others, between France before

1789 and England and the United States.--Lost forces.

--Mistaken use and excessive expenditure of mental energy.--

--The entire body of youth condemned to it after 1889.

Let us now consider another effect of the primitive institution, not

less pernicious. On leaving the lycée after the philosophy class, the

system supposes that a general education is fully obtained; there is not

question of a second one, ulterior and superior, that of universities.

In place of these encyclopedic universities, of which the object is

free teaching and the free progress of knowledge, it establishes special

State schools, separate from each other, each confined to a distinct

branch, each with a view to create, verify and proclaim a useful

capacity, each devoted to leading a young man along, step by step,

through a series of studies and tests up to the title or final diploma

which qualifies him for his profession, a diploma that is indispensable

or, at least, very useful since, without it, in many cases, one has no

right to practice his profession and which, thanks to it, in all cases,

enables one to enter on a career with favor and credit, in fair rank,

and considerably promoted.--On entering most careers called liberal,

a first diploma is exacted, that of bachelor of arts, or bachelor of

sciences, sometimes both, the acquisition of which is now a serious

matter for all French youth, a daily and painful preoccupation. To this

end, when about sixteen, the young man works, or, rather, is worked

upon. For one or two years, he submits to a forced culture, not in

view of learning and of knowing, but to answer questions well at an

examination, or tolerably well, and to obtain a certificate, on proof

or on semblance of proof, that he has received a complete classical

education.--Next after this, at the medical or law school, during the

four prescribed years, sixteen graduated inscriptions, four or five

superposed examinations, two or three terminal verifications, oblige

him to furnish the same proof, or semblance of proof, to verify, as each

year comes round, his assimilation of the lessons of the year, and thus

attest that, at the end of his studies, he possesses about the entire

scope and diversity of knowledge to which he is restricted.

In the schools where the number of pupils is limited, this culture,

carried still farther, becomes intense and constant. In the

École Centrale and in the commercial or agronomic schools, in the

Polytechnique or Normale, he is there all day and all night,--he is

housed in a barracks.--And the pressure on him is twofold--the pressure

of examinations and that of competition. On entering, on leaving, and

during his stay there, not only at the end of each year but every six

or three months, often every six weeks, and even every fortnight, he

is rated according to his compositions, exercises and interrogatories,

getting so many marks for his partial value, so many for his total value

and according to these figures, classed at a certain rank among

his comrades who are his rivals. To descend on the scale would be

disadvantageous and humiliating; to ascend on the scale is advantageous

and glorious. Driven by this motive, so strong in France, his principal

aim is to go up or, at least, not to go down; he devotes all his energy

to this; he expends none of it on either side or beyond; he allows

himself no diversion, he abstains from taking any initiative; his

restrained curiosity never ventures outside of the circle traced for

him; he absorbs only what he is taught and in the order in which it

is taught; he fills himself to the brim, but only to disgorge at the

examination and not to retain and hold on to; he runs the risk of

choking and when relieved, of remaining empty. Such is the régime of our

Grande Ecoles. They are systematic, energetic and prolonged system of

gardening; the State, the gardener-in-chief, receiving or selecting

plants which it undertakes to turn out profitably, each of its kind. To

this end, it separates the species, and ranges each apart on a bed of

earth; and here, all day long, it digs, weeds, rakes, waters, adds

one manure after another, applies its powerful heating apparatus and

accelerates the growth and ripening of the fruit. On certain beds

it plants are kept under glass throughout the year; in this way it

maintains them in a steady, artificial atmosphere, forcing them to more

largely imbibe the nutritive liquids with which it floods the ground,

thus causing them to swell and become hypertrophied, so as to produce

fruits or vegetables for show, and which it exposes and which bring it

credit; for all these productions look well, many of them superb,

while their size seems to attest their excellence; they are weighted

beforehand and the official labels with which they are decorated

announce the authentic weight.

During the first quarter, and even the first half, of the (19th)

century, the system remained almost unobjectionable; it had not yet

pushed things to excess. Down to 1850 and later, all that was demanded

of the young, in their examinations and competitions, was much less

the extent and minutia of knowledge than proofs of intelligence and the

promise of capacity: in a literary direction, the main object was to

verify whether the candidate, familiar with the classics, could write

Latin correctly and French tolerably well; in the sciences, if he

could, without help, accurately and promptly solve a problem; if, again

unaided, he could readily and accurately to the end, state a long series

of theorems and equations without divergence or faltering; in sum, the

object of the test was to verify in him the presence and degree of

the mathematical or literary faculty.--But, since the beginning of the

century, the old subdivided sciences and the new consolidated sciences

have multiplied their discoveries and, necessarily, all discoveries end

in finding their way into public instruction. In Germany, for them to

become installed and obtain chairs, encyclopedic universities are found,

in which free teaching, pliant and many-sided, rises of itself to the

level of knowledge.[6362] With us, for lack of universities, they have

had only special schools[6363]; here only could a place be found for

them and professors obtained. Henceforth, the peculiar character of

these schools has changed: they have ceased to be strictly special

and veritably professional.--Each school, being an individuality, has

developed apart and on its own account; its aim has been to install and

furnish under its own roof all the general, collateral, accessory and

ornamental studies which, far or near, could be of service to its own

pupils. No longer content with turning out competent and practical

men, it has conceived a superior type, the ideal model of the engineer,

physician, jurist, professor or architect. To produce this extraordinary

and desirable professional, it has designed some excessively difficult

impressive lectures.[6364] To be able to make use of these, it has given

the young man the opportunity not only to acquire abstract, multiple,

technical knowledge, and information, but also the complementary culture

and lofty general ideas, which render the specialist a true savant and a

man of a very broad mind.

To this end, it has appealed to the State. The State, the contractor

for public instruction, the founder of every new professional chair,

appoints the occupant, pays the salary and, when in funds, is not

ill-disposed, for it thus gains a good reputation, an increase of

granting power and a new functionary. Such is the why and wherefore, in

each school, of the multiplication of professorships: schools of law, of

medicine, of pharmacy, of charters, of fine arts, polytechnic, normal,

central, agronomic and commercial schools, each becoming, or tending to

become, a sort of university on a small scale, bringing together within

its walls the totality of teachings which, if the student profits by

them, renders him in his profession an accomplished personage.

Naturally, to secure attendance at these lectures, the school, in

concert with the State, adds to the exigencies of its examinations, and

soon, for the average of intellects and for health, the burden imposed

by it becomes too heavy. Particularly, in the schools to which admission

is gained only through competitions the extra load is still more

burdensome, owing to the greater crowd striving to pass; there are now

five, seven and even eleven candidates for one place.[6365] With this

crowd, it has been found necessary to raise and multiply the barriers,

urge the competitors to jump over them, and to open the door only to

those who jump the highest and in the greatest number. There is no other

way to make a selection among them without incurring the charge of

despotism and nepotism. It is their business to have sturdy legs and

make the best of them, then to submit to methodical training, to

practice and train all year and for several years in succession, in

order to pass the final test, without thinking of any but the barriers

in front of them on the race-course at the appointed date, and which

they must spring over to get ahead of their rivals.

At the present day[6366], after the complete course of classical

studies, four years in school no longer suffice for obtaining the

degrees of a doctor in medicine or doctor in law. Five or six years are

necessary. Two years are necessary between the baccalauréat ès-lettres

and the various licenses ès-lettres or sciences, and from these to the

corresponding aggrégations two, three years, and often more. Three years

of preparatory studies in mathematics and of desperate application lead

the young man to the threshold of the École Polytechnique; after that,

after two years in school and of no less sustained effort, the future

engineer passes three not less laborious years at the École des Ponts

et Chaussées or des Mines, which amounts to eight years of professional

preparation.[6367] Elsewhere, in the other schools, it is the same thing

with more or less excess. Observe how days and hours are spent during

this long period.[6368] The young men have attended lecture-courses,

masticated and re-masticated manuals, abbreviated abridgments, learned

by heart mementos and formulae, stored their memories with a vast

multitude of generalities and details. Every sort of preliminary

information, all the theoretical knowledge which, even indirectly,

may serve them in their future profession or which is of service in

neighboring professions, are classified in their brains, ready to come

forth at the first call, and, as proved by the examination, disposable

at a minute; they possess them, but nothing otherwise or beyond. Their

education has all tended to one side; they have undergone no practical

apprenticeship. Never have they taken an active part in or lent a hand

to any professional undertaking either as collaborators or assistants.

* The future professor, a new aggrégé at twenty-four years of age, who

issues from the École Normale, has not yet taught a class, except for a

fortnight in a Paris lycée.

* The future engineer who, at twenty-four or twenty-five years of age

leaves the École Centrale, or the École des Ponts, or École des Mines,

has never assisted in the working of a mine, in the heating of a blast

furnace, in the piercing of a tunnel, in the laying-out of a dike, of

a bridge or of a roadway. He is ignorant of the cost and has never

commanded a squad of workmen.

* If the future advocate or magistrate to be has put up with being a

notary's or lawyer's clerk, he will at twenty-five years of age, even

if he is a doctor of law with his insignia of three "white balls,"

know nothing of the business; he merely knows his codes; he has never

examined pleadings, conducted a case, drawn up an act or liquidated an

estate.

* From eighteen to thirty, the future architect who competes for a

prix de Rome may stay in the École des Beaux-Arts, draw plan after plan

there, and then, if he obtains the prix, pass five years at Rome, make

designs without end, multiply plans and restorations on paper, and at

last, at thirty-five years of age, return to Paris with the highest

titles, architect of the government, and with the aspiration to erect

edifices without having taken even a second or third part in the actual

construction of one single house.--

None of these men so full of knowledge know their trade and each, at

this late hour, is expected to act as an expert, improvising,[6369] in

haste and too fast, encountering many drawbacks at his own expense and

at the expense of others, along with serious risks for the first tasks

he undertakes.

Before 1789, says a witness of both the ancient and the modern régime,

[6370] young Frenchmen did not thus pass their early life. Instead

of dancing attendance so long on the threshold of a career, they were

inducted into it very early in life and at once began the race. With

very light baggage and readily obtained "they entered the army at

sixteen, and even fifteen years of age, at fourteen in the navy, and

a little later in special branches, artillery or engineering. In the

magistracy, at nineteen, the son of a conseiller-maître in parliament

was made a conseiller-adjoint without a vote until he reached

twenty-five; meanwhile, he was busy, active and sometimes was made a

reporter of a case. No less precocious were the admissions to the Cour

des Comptes, to the Cour des Aides, to inferior jurisdictions and into

the bureaus of all the financial administrations." Here, as elsewhere,

if any rank in law was exacted the delay that ensured was not apparent;

the Faculty examinations were only for forms sake; for a sum of money,

and after a more or less grave ceremonial, a needed diploma was obtained

almost without study.[6371]--Accordingly, it was not in school, but in

the profession, that professional instruction was acquired; strictly

speaking, the young man for six or seven years, instead of being a

student was an apprentice, that is to say a working novice under several

master-workmen, in their workshop, working along with them and learning

by doing, which is the best way of obtaining instruction. Struggling

with the difficulties of the work he at once became aware of his

incompetence;[6372] he became modest and was attentive; with his

masters, he kept silent, and listened, which is the only way to

understand. If he was intelligent he himself discovered what he lacked;

as he found this out he felt the need of supplying what he needed; he

sought, set his wits to work, and made choice of the various means;

freely and self-initiating he helped himself in his general or special

education. If he read books, it was not resignedly and for a recitation,

but with avidity and to comprehend them. If he followed lecture-courses

it was not because he was obliged to, but voluntarily, because he was

interested and because he profited by it.--Chancellor Pasquier was

magistrate at seventeen (in 1784), attended at the lycée the lectures of

Garat, La Harpe, Fourcroy and Duparcieux and, daily, at table or in the

evening, listened to his father and his friends discussing matters

which, in the morning, had been argued in the Palais de Justice or in

the Grand-Chambre. He imbibed a taste for his profession. Along with two

or three prominent advocates and other young magistrates like himself,

he inscribed his name for lectures at the house of the first president

of the first court of inquiry. Meanwhile, he went every evening into

society; he saw there with his own eyes the ways and interests of men

and women. On the other hand, at the Palais de Justice, a conseiller-

écoutant he sat for five years, alongside of the conseiller-juges and

often, the reporter of a case, he gave his opinion. After such a

novitiate, he was competent to form a judgment in civil or criminal

cases with experience, competency and authority. From the age of

twenty-five, he was prepared for and capable of serious duties. He had

only to live and perfect himself to become an administrator, deputy or

minister, a dignitary as we see under the first Empire, under the

Restoration, under the July monarchy, that is to say the best informed,

well-balanced, judicious political character and, at length, the man of

highest consideration of his epoch.[6373]

Such is also the process which, still at the present day (1890),

in England and in America secures future ability in the various

professions. In the hospital, in the mine, in factories, with the

architect, with the lawyer, the pupil, taken very young, goes through

his apprenticeship and subsequent stages about the same as a clerk

with us in an office or an art-student in the studio. Preliminarily and

before entering it, he has attended some general seminary lecture which

serves him as a ready-made basis for the observations he is about to

make. Meanwhile, there are very often technical courses within reach,

which he may attend at his leisure in order to give shape to his daily

experiences as these happen to accumulate. Under a régime of this stamp

practical capacity grows and develops of itself, just to that degree

which the faculties of the pupil warrant, and in the direction which his

future aims require, through the special work to which he wishes for the

time being to adapt himself. In this way, in England and in the United

States, the young man soon succeeds in developing all he is good for.

From the age of twenty-five and much sooner, if the substance and

bottom are not wanting, he is not only a useful subordinate, but again a

spontaneous creator, not merely a wheel but besides this a motor force.

In France, where the inverse process has prevailed and become more and

more Chinese at each generation, the total of the force lost is immense.

The most productive period of human life extends from fifteen or sixteen

up to twenty-five or twenty-six; here are seven or eight years of

growing energy and of constant production, buds, flowers and fruit;

during this period the young man sketches out his original ideas. But,

that these ideas may be born in him, sprout, and flourish they must,

at this age, profit by the stimulating or repressive influence of the

atmosphere in which they are to live later on; here only are they formed

in their natural and normal environment; their germs depend for their

growth on the innumerable impressions due to the young man's sensations,

daily, in the workshop, in the mine, in the court-room, in the studio,

on the scaffolding of a building, in the hospital, on seeing tools,

materials and operations, in talking with clients and workmen, in doing

work, good or bad, costly or remunerative; such are the minute and

special perceptions of the eyes and the ears, of touch and even smell

which, involuntarily gathered in and silently elaborated, work together

in him and suggest, sooner or later, this or that new combination,

economy, perfection or invention.[6374] The young Frenchman, just at

this fecund age, is deprived of all these precious contacts, of all

these assimilating and indispensable elements. During seven or eight

years, he is shut up in school, remote from the direct and personal

experience which might have given him an exact and vivifying notion of

men and things, and of the various ways of handling them. All this time

his inventive faculties are deliberately sterilized; he can be nothing

but a passive recipient; whatever he might have produced under the other

system he cannot produce under this one; the balance of debit and

credit is utter loss.--Meanwhile, the cost has been great. Whilst the

apprentice, the clerk busy with his papers in his office, the interne

with his apron standing by the bedside of the patient in the hospital,

pays by his services, at first for his instruction, then for his

breakfast, and ends in gaining something besides, at least his

pocket-money, the student under the Faculty, or the pupil in a special

school is educated and lives at the expense of his family or of the

State; he gives back in exchange not work that is useful to mankind,

none that is worth anything on the market; his actual consumption is not

compensated for by his actual production. Undoubtedly, he cherishes the

hope that some day or other he will obtain compensation, that we will

refund later and largely both capital and interest, and all the advances

made; in other words, his future services are discounted and, as far as

he is concerned, he speculates on a long credit.--It remains to be seen

whether the speculation is a good one; whether, at last, the receipts

will cover the expenses, in short, what will be the net or average

returns on the man thus fashioned.[6375]

Now, among the forces expended, the most important to take into account

is the time and attention of the pupil, the sum of his efforts, this or

that quantity of mental energy; he has only a limited provision of

this, and, not only is the proportion of this which the system consumes

excessive, but, again, the application of it which the system enforces

is not remunerative. The provision is exhausted and by a wrong use of

it, with scarcely any profit.--In our lycées, the pupil sits at his task

more than eleven hours a day; in a certain ecclesiastical college it is

twelve hours, and, from the age of twelve years, through the necessity

of being first in competition as well as for securing the greatest

number of admissions through various examinations.--At the end of this

secondary education there is a graduated scale of successive test, and

first the baccalauréat. Fifty out of one hundred candidates fail and

the examiners are indulgent.[6376] This proves, first of all, that the

rejected have profited by their studies; but it likewise proves that the

program of the examination is not adapted to the general run of minds,

nor to the native faculties of the human majority; that many young men

capable of learning by the opposite method learn nothing by this one;

that education, such as it is, with the kind and greatness of the mental

labor it imposes, with its abstract and theoretical style, is beyond

the capacity of the average mind.--Particularly, during the last year

of classical studies, the pupils have had to follow the philosophy

lectures: in the time of M. Laromiquière, this might be useful to them;

in the time of M. Cousin, the course, so far, did but little harm; at

the present day, impregnated with neo-Kantism, it injects into minds of

eighteen, seventeen, and even sixteen years, a metaphysical muddle as

cumbersome as the scholasticism of the fourteenth century, terribly

indigestible and unhealthy for the stomachs of novices; the swallow

even to bursting and throw it off at the examination just as it comes,

entirely raw for lack of the capacity to assimilate it.--Often, after

failure at the baccalauréat, or on entering the preparatory or Grande

Écoles, the young people go into, or are put into, what they call "a

box" or an "oven" a preparatory internat, similar to the boxes in which

silkworms are raised and to the ovens where the eggs are hatched. In

more exact language it is a mechanical "gaveuse"[6377] in which they

are daily crammed; through this constant, forced feeding, their

real knowledge is not increased, nor their mental vigor; they are

superficially fattened and, at the end of the year, or in eighteen

months, they present themselves on the appointed day, with the

artificial and momentary volume they need for that day, with the bulk,

surface, polish and all the requisite externals, because these externals

are the only ones that the examination verifies and imposes.[6378] Less

harshly, but in the same manner and with the same object, operate

the special education services which, inside our colleges and lycées,

prepare young men for the École de Saint-Cyr and for the polytechnic,

naval, central, normal, agricultural, commercial and forestry schools;

in these too, the studies are cramming machines which prepare the pupil

for examination purposes. In the like manner, above secondary education,

all our special schools are public cramming machines;[6379] alongside of

them are private schools advertised and puffed in the newspapers and by

posters of the walls, preparing young men for the license degree in Law

and for the third or fourth examinations in Medicine. Some day or other,

others will probably exist to prepare them for Treasury inspectors, for

the "Cour des Comptes," for diplomacy, by competition, the same as for

the medical profession, for a hospital surgeon and for aggregation in

law, medicine, letters or sciences.

Undoubtedly, some minds, very active and very robust, withstand this

régime; all they have been made to swallow is absorbed and digested.

After leaving school and having passed through all grades they preserve

the faculty of learning, investigating and inventing intact, and compose

the small élite of scholars, litterateurs, artists, engineers and

physicians who, in the international exposition of superior talent,

maintain France in its ancient rank.[6380]--But the rest, in very great

majority, nine out of ten at least, have lost their time and trouble,

many years of their life and years that are useful, important and even

decisive: take at once one-half or two-thirds of those who present

themselves at the examinations, I mean the rejected, and then, among the

admitted who get diplomas, another half or two-thirds that is to say,

the overworked. Too much has been required of them by exacting that, on

such a day, seated or before the blackboard, for two entire hours, they

should be living repertories of all human knowledge; in effect, such

they are, or nearly so, that day, for two hours; but, a month later,

they are so no longer; they could not undergo the same examination;

their acquisitions, too numerous and too burdensome, constantly drop of

their minds and they make no new ones. Their mental vigor has given way,

the fecund sap has dried up; the finished man appears, often a finished

man content to be put away, to be married, and plod along indefinitely

in the same circle, entrenched in his restricted vocation and doing his

duty, but nothing more. Such are the average returns--assuredly, the

profits do not make up for the expenses. In England and in America

where, as before 1789 in France, the inverse method is followed, the

returns are equal or superior,[6381] and they are obtained with greater

facility, with more certainty, at an age less tardy, without imposing

such great and unhealthy efforts on the young man, such large

expenditure by the State, and such long delays and sacrifices on

families.[6382]

Now, in the four Faculties of Law, Medicine, Science and Letters, there

are this year 22,000 students; add to these the pupils of the special

schools and those who study with the hope of entering them, in all

probably 30,000. But there is no need of counting them; since the

suppression of the one-year voluntariat, the entire body of youths

capable of study, who wish to remain only one year in barracks and not

remain there to get brutalized during three years, flocks to the benches

of the lycée or to those of a Faculty.[6383] The sole object of the

young man is not, as before, to reach the baccalauréat; it is essential

that he should be admitted, after a competition, into one of the

special schools, or obtain the highest grades or diplomas in one of the

Faculties; in all cases he is bound to successfully undergo difficult

and multiplied examinations. At present time (1890), there is no place

in France for an education in the inverse sense, nor for any other of a

different type. Henceforth, no young man, without condemning himself to

three years of barrack life, can travel at an early age for any length

of time, or form his mind at home by free and original studies, stay

in Germany and follow speculative studies in the universities, or go to

England or to America to derive practical instruction from factory or

farm. Captured by our system, he is forced to surrender himself to the

mechanical routine which fills his mind with fictitious tools, with

useless and cumbersome acquisitions that impose on him in exchange

an exorbitant expenditure of mental energy and which is very like to

convert him into a mandarin.

V. Public instruction in 1890.

Public instruction since 1870.--Agreement between the

Napoleonic and Jacobin conception.--Extension and

aggravation of the system.--The deductive process of the

Jacobin mind.--Its consequences.--In superior and in

secondary instruction.--In primary instruction.--Gratuitous,

obligatory and secular instruction.

Such is the singular and final result brought about by the institution

of the year X (or 1801), due to the intervention of the grossly leveling

Jacobin spirit.[6384] Indeed, since 1871, and especially since 1879,

this spirit, through Napoleonic forms, has given breath, impulse and

direction, and these forms suit it. On the principle that education

belongs to the State, Napoleon and the old Jacobins were in accord;

what he in fact established they had proclaimed as a dogma; hence the

structure of his university-organisation was not objectionable to them;

on the contrary, it conformed to their instincts. Hence, the reason why

the new Jacobins, inheritors of both instinct and dogma, immediately

adopted the existing system; none was more convenient, better calculated

to meet their views, better adapted in advance to do their work.

Consequently, under the third Republic,[6385] as under anterior

governments, the school machinery continues to turn and grind in the

same rut. Through the same working of its mechanism, under the same

impulse of its unique and central motor, conforming to the same

Napoleonic and Jacobin idea of the teaching State, it is a formidable

concept which, more intrusive every year, more widely and more

rigorously applied, more and more excludes the opposite concept. This

would be the remission of education to those interested in it, to those

who possess rights, to parents, to free and private enterprises which

depend only on personal exertions and on families, to permanent,

special, local corporations, proprietary and organized under status,

governed, managed, and supported by themselves. On this model, a few

men of intelligence and sensibility, enlightened by what is accomplished

abroad, try to organize regional universities in our great academic

centers. The State might, perhaps, allow, if not the enterprise itself,

then at least something like it, but nothing more. Through its right

of public administration, through the powers of its Council of State,

through its fiscal legislation, through the immemorial prejudices of

its jurists, through the routine of its bureaus, it is hostile to

a corporate personality. Never can such a project be considered a

veritable civil personage; if the State consents to endow a group of

individuals with civil powers, it is always on condition that they be

subject to its narrow tutelage and be treated as minors and children.

--Besides, these universities, even of age, are to remain as they are,

so many dispensaries of diplomas. They are no longer to serve as an

intellectual refuge, an oasis at the end of secondary instruction, a

station for three or four years for free curiosity and disinterested

self-culture. Since the abolition of the volontariat for one year, a

young Frenchman no longer enjoys the leisure to cultivate himself in

this way; free curiosity is interdicted; he is too much harassed by

a too positive interest, by the necessity of obtaining grades and

diplomas, by the preoccupations of examinations, by the limitations of

age; he has no time to lose in experiments, in mental excursions, in

pure speculations. Henceforth, our system allows him only the régime to

which we see him subject, namely the rush, the puffing and blowing, the

gallop without stopping on a race-course, the perilous jumps at regular

distances over previously arranged and numbered obstacles. Instead of

being restricted and attenuated, the disadvantages of the Napoleonic

institution spread and grow worse, and this is due to the way in which

our rulers comprehend it, the original, hereditary way of the Jacobin

spirit.

When Napoleon built his University he did it as a statesman and a man

of business, with the foresight of a contractor and a practical man,

calculating outlay and receipts, means and resources, so as to produce

at once and with the least expense, the military and civil tools which

he lacked and of which he always had too few because he consumed too

many: to this precise, definite purpose he subjected and subordinated

all the rest, including the theory of the educational State; she was for

him simply a résumé, a formula, a setting. On the contrary, for the

old Jacobins, she was an axiom, a principle, an article in the Social

Contract; by this contract, the State had charge of public education;

it had the right and its duty was to undertake this and manage it. The

principle being laid down, as convinced theorists and blindly following

the deductive method, the derived consequences from it and rushed ahead,

with eyes shut, into practical operation, with as much haste as vigor,

without concerning themselves with the nature of human materials, of

surrounding realities, of available resources, of collateral effects,

nor of the total and final effect. Likewise with the new Jacobins of the

present day, according to them, since instruction is a good thing,[6386]

the broader and deeper it is the better; since broad and deep

instruction is very good, the State should, with all its energy and by

every means in its power, inculcate it on the greatest possible number

of children, boys and adolescents. Such, henceforth, is the word of

command from on high, transmitted down to the three stages of superior,

secondary and primary instruction.[6387]

Consequently, from 1876 to 1890,[6388] the State expends for superior

instruction, in buildings alone, 99,000,000 francs. Formerly, the

receipts of the Faculties about covered their expenses; at the present

day, the State allows them annually 6,000,000 francs more than their

receipts. It has founded and supports 221 new (professional) chairs, 168

complementary courses of lectures, 129 conférences and, to supply

the attendants, it provides, since 1877, 300 scholarships for those

preparing for the license and, since 1881, 200 scholarships for those

preparing for the aggrégation. Similarly, in secondary instruction,

instead of 81 lycées in 1876, it has 100 in 1887[6389]; instead of

3,820 scholarships in 1876, it distributes, in 1887, 10,528; instead

of 2,200,000 francs expended for this branch of instruction in 1857, it

expends 18,000,000 in 1889.--This overload of teaching caused overloaded

exams: it was necessary to include more science than in the past to

curriculum of the grades delivered and determined by the State. "This

was what was then done whenever possible."[6390] Naturally, and through

contagion, the obligation of possessing more knowledge descended to

secondary instruction. In effect, after this date, we see neo-Kantian

philosophy descending like hail from the highest metaphysical ether

down upon the pupils in the terminal class of the lycées, to the lasting

injury of the seventeen-year old brains. Again, after this date, we see

in the class of special mathematics[6391] an abundance of complicated,

confusing problems so that, today, the candidate for the Polytechnic

School must, to gain admission, expound theorems that were only mastered

by his father after he got there.--Hence, "boxes" and "ovens", private

internats, the preparatory secular or ecclesiastical schools and other

"scholastic cramming-machines"; hence, the prolonged mechanical effort

to introduce into each intellectual sponge all the scientific fluid it

can contain, even to saturation, and maintain it in this extreme state

of perfection if only for two hours during an examination, after which

it may rapidly subside and shrink. Hence, that mistaken use, that

inordinate expenditure, that precocious waste of mental energy, and that

entire pernicious system which overburden for a substantial period the

young, not for their advantage, but, on reaching maturity, to their

intellectual detriment.

To reach the uncultivated masses, to address popular intellect and

imagination, one must use absolute, simple slogans. In the matter of

primary instruction, the simplest and most absolute slogan is that

which promises and offers it to all children, boys and girls, not merely

universal, but again, complete and gratuitous. To this end, from 1878

to 1891,[6392] the State has expended for school buildings and

installations 582,000,000 francs; for salaries and other expenses it

furnished the latter year 131,000,000. Somebody pays for all this, and

it is the tax-payer, and by force; aided by gendarmes, the collector

puts his hand forcibly into all pockets, even those containing only

sous, and withdraws these millions. Gratuitous instruction sounds well

and seems to designate a veritable gift, a present from the great vague

personage called the State, and whom the general public dimly sees

on the distant horizon as a superior, independent being, and hence a

possible benefactor. In reality, his presents are made with our money,

while his generosity consists in the fine name with which he here gilds

his fiscal exactions, a new constraint added to so many others which he

imposes on us and which we endure.[6393]--Besides, through instinct and

tradition, the State is naturally inclined to multiply constraints, and

this time there is no concealment. From six to thirteen years of age,

primary instruction becomes obligatory.[6394] The father is required to

prove that his children receive it, if not at the public school at least

in a private school or at home. During these seven years it continues,

and ten months are devoted to it each year. The school takes and keeps

the child three hours in the morning and three hours in the afternoon;

it pours into these little heads all that is possible in such a length

of time, all that they can hold and more too,--spelling, syntax,

grammatical and logical analysis, rules of composition and of

style, history, geography, arithmetic, geometry, drawing, notions of

literature, politics, law, and finally a complete moral system, "civic

morality."

It is obviously very useful for every adult to be able to read, write

and reckon. Who, then, can criticize a Government because it insists

that all children be taught these basic skills? But for the same reason

and on the same principle, provision could be made for swimming-schools

in every village and town on the sea-coast, or on the streams and

rivers; every boy should be obliged to learn how to swim.--That it may

be useful for every boy and girl in the United States to pass through

the entire system of primary instruction is peculiar to the United

States and is comprehensible in an extensive and new country where

multiplied and diverse pursuits present themselves on all sides;[6395]

where every career may lead to the highest pinnacle; where a

rail-splitter may become president of the republic; where the adult

often changes his career and, to afford him the means for improvising a

competency at each change, he must possess the elements of every kind of

knowledge; where the wife, being for the man an object of luxury, does

not use her arms in the fields and scarcely ever uses her hands in the

household.[6396]--It is not the same in France. Nine out of ten pupils

in the primary school are sons or daughters of peasants or of workmen

and will remain in the condition of their parents; the girl, adult, will

do washing and cooking all her life at home or abroad; the son, adult,

confined to his occupation will work all his life in a shop or on

his own or another's field. Between this destiny of the adult and the

plenitude of his primary instruction, the disproportion is enormous; it

is evident that his education does not prepare him for the life he has

to lead; but for another life, less monotonous, under less restraint,

more cerebral, and of which a faint glimpse disgusts him with his

own;[6397] at least, it will disgust him for a long time and frequently,

until the day comes when his school acquisitions, wholly superficial,

shall have evaporated in contact with the ambient atmosphere and

no longer appear to him other than empty phrases; in France, for an

ordinary peasant or workman, so much the better if this day comes

early.[6398]

At the very least, three quarters of these acquisitions are for him

superfluous. He derives no advantage from them, neither for inward

satisfaction or for getting ahead in the world; and yet they must all be

gone through with. In vain would the father of a family like to curtail

his children's mental stores to useful knowledge, to reading, writing

and arithmetic, to giving to these just the necessary time, at the

right season, three months for two or three winters, to keep his

twelve-year-old daughter at home to help her mother and take care of the

other children, to keep his boy of ten years for pasturing cattle or for

goading on the oxen at the plow.[6399] In relation to his children and

their interests as well as for his own necessities, he is suspect, he is

not a good judge; the State has more light and better intentions than he

has. Consequently, the State has the right to constrain him and in fact,

from above, from Paris, the State does this. Legislators, as formerly in

1793, have acted according to Jacobin procedure, as despotic theorists.

They have formed in their minds a uniform, universal, simple type, that

of a child from six to thirteen years as they want to see it, without

adjusting the instruction they impose on it to its prospective

condition, making abstraction of his positive and personal interest, of

his near and certain future, setting the father aside, the natural

judge and competent measurer of the education suitable to his son and

daughter, the sole authorized arbiter for determining the quality,

duration, circumstances and counterpoise of the mental and moral

manipulation to which these young lives, inseparable from his own, are

going to be subject away from home.--Never, since the Revolution,

has the State so vigorously affirmed its omnipotence, nor pushed in

encroachments on and intrusion into the proper domain of the individual

so far, even to the very center of domestic life. Note that in 1793

and 1794 the plans of Lepelletier de Saint-Fargeau and of Saint-Just

remained on paper; the latter for ten years have been in practical

operation.[63100]

At bottom, the Jacobin is a sectarian, propagator of his own faith, and

hostile to the faith of others. Instead of admitting that that people's

conceptions are different and rejoicing that there are so many of them,

each adapted to the human group which believes in it, and essential to

believers to help them along, he admits but one, his own, and he

uses power to force it upon adherents. He also has his own creed,

his catechism, his imperative formula, and he imposes them.--

Henceforth,[63101] education shall be not only free and obligatory but

again secular and nothing but secular. Thus far, the great majority of

parents, most of the fathers and all of the mothers, were desirous that

it should at the same time be religious. Without speaking of professing

Christians, many heads of families, even lukewarm, indifferent or

skeptical, judge that this mixture of the two is better for children,

and especially for girls. According to them, knowledge and faith should

not enter into these young minds separate, but combined and as one

aliment; at least, in the particular case in which they were concerned,

this, in their view, was better for the child, for themselves, for the

internal discipline of the household, for good order at home for which

they were responsible, for the maintenance of respect, and for the

preservation of morals. For this reason, the municipal councils,

previous to the laws of 1882 and 1886, still free to choose instruction

and teachers as they pleased, often entrusted their school to the

Christian Brethren or Sisters under contract for a number of years, at

a fixed price, and all the more willingly because this price was very

low.[63102] Hence, in 1886, there were in the public schools 10,029

teachers of the Christian Brethren and 39,125 of the Sisters. Now, since

1886, the law insists that public instruction shall be not only secular,

but that lay teachers only shall teach; the communal schools, in

particular, shall be all secularized, and, to complete this operation,

the legislator fixes the term of delay; after that, no member of a

congregation, monk or nun, shall teach in any public school.

Meanwhile, each year, by virtue of the law, the communal schools are

secularized by hundreds, by fair means or foul; although this is by

right a local matter, the municipal councils are not consulted; the

heads of families have no voice in this private, domestic interest which

touches them to the quick, and such a sensitive point. And likewise, in

the cost of the operation their part is officially imposed them; at the

present day,[63103] in the sum-total of 131,000,000 francs which primary

instruction costs annually, the communes contribute 50,000,000 francs;

from 1878 to 1891, in the sum-total of 582,000,000 francs expended

on school buildings, they contributed 312,000,000 francs.--If certain

parents are not pleased with this system they have only to subscribe

amongst themselves, build a private school at their own expense, and

support Christian Brothers or Sisters in these as teachers. That is

their affair; they will not pay one cent less to the commune, to the

department or to the State, so that their tax will be double and they

will pay twice, first for the primary instruction which they dislike,

and next for the primary instruction which suits them.--Thousands of

private schools are founded on these conditions. In 1887,[63104] these

had 1,091,810 pupils, about one fifth of all children inscribed in

all the primary schools. Thus one fifth of the parents do not want the

secular system for their children; at least, they prefer the other

when the other is offered to them; but, to offer it to them, very large

donations, a multitude of voluntary subscriptions, are necessary. The

distrust and aversion which this system, imposed from above excites can

be measured by the number of parents and children and by the greatness

of the donations and subscriptions. Note, moreover, that in many of

the other communes, in all places where the resources, the common

understanding and the generosity of individual founders and donators

are not sufficient, the parents, even distrustful and hostile, are now

constrained to send their children to the school which is repugnant

to them.--In order to be more precise, imagine an official and daily

journal entitled Secular journal, obligatory and gratuitous for children

from six to thirteen, founded and supported by the State, at an average

cost of 582,000,000 francs to set it agoing, and 131,0000,000 francs

of annual expenditure, the whole taken from the purses of taxpayers,

willingly or not; take it for granted that the 6,000,000 children, girls

and boys, from six to thirteen, are forced subscribers to this journal,

that they get it every day except Sundays, that, every day, they are

bound to read the paper for six hours. The State, through toleration,

allows the parents who do not like the official sheet to take another

which suits them; but, that another may be within reach, it is necessary

that local benefactors, associated together and taxed by themselves,

should be willing to establish and support it; otherwise, the father

of a family is constrained to read the secular journal to his

children, which he deems badly composed and marred by superfluities and

shortcomings, in brief edited in an objectionable spirit. Such is the

way in which the Jacobin State respects the liberty of the individual.

On the other hand, through this operation, it has extended and fortified

itself; it has multiplied the institutions it directs and the persons

whom it controls. To direct, inspect, augment and diffuse its primary

instruction, the State has maintained 173 normal schools for teachers,

male and female, 736 schools and courses of lectures in primary,

superior and professional instruction, 66,784 elementary schools, 3,597

maternal schools, and about 115,000 functionaries, men and women.[63105]

Through these 115,000 officials, representatives and megaphones,

Secular Reason, which is enthroned at Paris, sends its voice even to

the smallest and most remote villages. It is this Reason, as our rulers

define it, with the inclinations, limitations and prejudices they have

need of, the near-sighted and half-domesticated grand-daughter of that

other formidable sightless, brutal and mad grandmother, who, in 1793

and 1794, sat under the same name and in the same place. With less of

violence and blundering, but by virtue of the same instinct and with

the same one-sidedness, the latter employs the same propaganda. She

too wants to seize the new generations, and through her programs and

manuals, her insinuations and summaries of the Ancient Régime, the

Revolution and the Empire, by her perceptions of recent or contemporary

matters, through her formulae and suggestions in relation to moral,

social and political affairs, it is of her and she alone, that she

preaches and glorifies.

VI. Summary.

Total and actual effect of the system.--Increasing

unsuitableness between early education and adult life.

--Change for the worse in the mental and moral balance of

contemporary youth.

In this manner does the education by the State end. (in 1890) When a

matter is taken out of the hands of those who are concerned and handed

over to a third and differently motivated party, it cannot end well;

sooner or later, this basic defect will dominate and lead to unexpected

results. In this case a growing disparity between education and life.

On the three levels of instruction, infancy, adolescence and youth, the

actual theoretical and direct instruction is extended and overloaded

with the examination, the grade, the diploma and the certificate in view

only. To this end any and all means is used; through the application of

an unnatural and anti-social system competition, through excessive delay

in practical apprenticeship, through the internat, through artificial

stimulation and mechanical cramming, and through overwork. There is no

consideration of the future, of the adult epoch and the duties of the

complete man. The real world in which the young man is about to enter,

the state of society to which he must adapt or resign himself, the human

struggle in which he must defend himself or keep erect is left out. For

this new life he is neither armed, equipped, drilled and hardened.

That solid common sense, that determination and those steady nerves,

indispensable tools in life, are not dispensed by our schools; quite the

contrary; far from qualifying him for his approaching independence the

schools disqualify him for it. Accordingly, his entrance into the world

and his first steps on the field of practical life are generally a

series of painful failures; as a consequence he remains bruised, often

for a long time, offended sometimes permanently crippled. This is a rude

and dangerous ordeal; the moral and mental balance is altered and

risks never being restored; his illusions vanish too suddenly and too

completely. His deceptions have been too great and his disappointment

too severe. Sometimes, among close friends, embittered and worn out like

himself, he is tempted to tell us:

"Through your education you have led us to believe, or you have let us

believe, that the world is made in a certain fashion. You have deceived

us. It is much uglier, more dull, dirtier, sadder and harder, at least

in our opinion and to our imagination: you judge us as overexcited and

disordered; if so, it is your fault. For this reason, we curse and scoff

at your world and reject your pretended truths which, for us, are lies,

including those elementary and primordial verities which you declare

are evident to common sense, and on which you base your laws, your

institutions, your society, your philosophy, your sciences and your

arts."

This is what our contemporary youth, through their tastes, opinions,

vague desires in letters, arts and life, have loudly proclaimed for the

past fifteen years.[63106] (Written in 1890.)

*****

POSTSCRIPT:

It is only fair to the French to note that they have, since the law

called Debré in 1959 allowed the Catholic schools to operate freely with

teachers paid by the state provided they,

* use qualified teachers,

* have a contract with the government submitting to inspection of their

buildings etc.,

* submit to government study programs,

* regular accepted hours etc. (SR.)

*****

[Footnote 6301: Ordinance of Oct. 4, 1814.]

[Footnote 6302: Liard, "L'Enseignement supérieur pendant la

Restauration." (Rev. des deux Mondes, number for Feb.15, 1892.) Decree

of April 8, 1814.]

[Footnote 6303: Ordinance of April 17, 1815 (to suppress the

university pay and separate the sole University into seventeen regional

universities.) This ordinance, dating from the last days of the first

Restoration, is repealed the first days of the second Restoration, Aug.

15, 1815.]

[Footnote 6304: "The Modern Régime," p.316. (Laff. II 581-582.)]

[Footnote 6305: Basset, censor of studies in the Charlemagne college,

"Coup d'oeil général sur l'Éducation et l'Instruction publique en France"

(1816), p. 21. (State of the University in 1815.)]

[Footnote 6306: Today, in year 2000, the educational machinery in France

employs more than 1 million teachers and, as all children are in school

from the age of 3 to at least 16 years of age, there are more than 12

million children and students under the tutelage of the state. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6307: Political party terms.]

[Footnote 6308: Ordinance of Feb.21, 1821, article 13, and Report by M.

de Corbières: "The youth clamour for a religious and moral direction..

.. The religious direction belongs by right to the highest pastors:

it is proper to ask from them for these establishments (the university

colleges) for constant supervision and to legally call on them to

suggest all measures that they may deem necessary."]

[Footnote 6309: Liard, "L'Enseignement supérieur," 840 (Speech by

Benjamin Constant in the Chamber of Députés, May 18th, 1827).]

[Footnote 6310: Ordinances of Novem. 21, 1822, article I, and Feb. 2,

1823, article II.]

[Footnote 6311: Ordinances of Sep. 6, 1822, and of Feb. 21st, 1821,

title VI, with report by M. de Corbières.]

[Footnote 6312: Liard, ibid., p. 840. (Circular addressed to the rectors

by Monseigneur Freyssinous immediately after his installation:)

"In summoning a man of sacerdotal character to the head of public

instruction, His Majesty has made all France well aware of his great

desire to have the youth of his kingdom brought up in monarchical and

religious sentiments.... Whoever has the misfortune to live without

religion, or not to be devoted to the reigning family, ought to be

sensible of what he lacks in becoming a worthy instructor of youth. He

is to be pitied and is even culpable."--"Ambroise Rendu," by Eug. Rendu,

p. III (circular to rectors in 1817). "Make it known to the MM. the

bishops and to all ecclesiastics that, in the work of education, you are

simply auxiliaries, and that the object of primary instruction is above

all to fortify religious instruction."]

[Footnote 6313: De Riancey, "Histoire de l'instruction publique,"

II.,312. (Apropos of the lectures by Guizot and Cousin, stopped by Mgr.

de Freyssinous:) "He did not believe that a Protestant and a philosopher

could treat the most delicate questions of history and science with

impartiality, and through a fatal effect of the monopoly he found

himself placed between his conscience and the law. On this occasion he

sacrificed the law."]

[Footnote 6314: Liard, ibid., p.837. After 1820, "a series of measures

are passed which, little by little, give back its primitive constitution

to the University and even end in incorporating it more closely with

power than under the Empire."]

[Footnote 6315: Here Taine describes the very principle of democratic

government in a welfare state. "Do not worry, demand and we supply,

the rich will pay!!!" Taine understood and foresaw the riches which the

industrial society could be made to produce but neither he nor anyone

else could foresee that Human Rights should include central heating,

housing, running hot and cold water, television, free health care, a car

and worldwide tourism..(SR.)]

[Footnote 6316: See "The Modern Régime," I., pp.183, 202.]

[Footnote 6317: Maggiolo, "des Ecoles en Lorraine." (Details on several

communal schools.) 3rd part, pp. 9-50.--Cf. Jourdain, "le Budget de

l'Instruction publique," 1857, passim. (Appropriation by the State for

primary instruction in 1829, 100,000 francs; in 1832, 1,000,000 francs;

in 1847, 2,400,000 francs;--for secondary instruction, in 1830, 920,000

francs; in 1848, 1,500,000 francs; in 1854, 1,549,241 francs. (The towns

support their own communal colleges.)--Liard," Universités et Facultés,"

p. II. In 1829, the budget of Faculties does not reach 1,000,000 francs;

in 1848, it is 2,876,000 francs.]

[Footnote 6318: Law of Floreal 11, year X, article 4.--"Rapport sur

la statistique comparée de l'enseignement primaire," 1880, vol. II.,p.

133;--31 per cent of the pupils in the public schools were gratuitously

admitted in 1837; 57 per cent in 1876-77. The congregationists admit

about two thirds of their scholars gratuitously and one third for pay.]

[Footnote 6319: Cf. Jourdain, Ibid., pp. 22, 143, 161.]

[Footnote 6320: Cf. Jourdain, Ibid., p.287. (The fixed salary and

examination-fees are included in the above figures.) In 1850, the

regular salary of the professor in the Paris Medical Faculty is reduced

from 7000 to 6000 francs. In 1849, the maximum of all the salaries of

the Law professors is limited to 12,000 francs.]

[Footnote 6321: Read, among other biographies, "Ambroise Rendu," by Eug.

Rendu.]

[Footnote 6322: This, in France, lasted until the Communists in 1946

insisted as a price for their participation in governing France that

the right to strike for civil servants be inserted in the French

Constitution. In this way Stalin was sure to trouble France a great

deal. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6323: "Rapport sur la statistique comparée de l'enseignement

primaire," 1880, vol. II.,pp.8, 110, 206.--Law of March 15, 1850,

"Exposé des motifs," by M. Beugnot.]

[Footnote 6324: "Revue des Deux Mondes," number of Aug.15, 1869, pp.

909, 911. (Article by M. Boissier.)]

[Footnote 6325: Act of Nov. 9, 1818. (Down to 1850 and after, the

University so arranged its teaching (in high school) as not to come

in conflict with the clergy on the debatable grounds of history. For

example, at the end of the 8th grade the history of the Roman Empire

after Augustus was rapidly passed over and then, in the 9th grade,

they began again with the invasion of the barbarians. The origins of

Christianity and the entire primitive history of the Christian Church

were thus avoided. For the same reason, modern history ended in 1789.]

[Footnote 6326: M. Guizot, "Mémoires," vol. II.]

[Footnote 6327: An eminent university personage, a political character

and man of the world, said to me in 1850: "Pedagogy does not exist.

There are only personal methods which each finds out for himself and

eloquent phrases for effect on the public."--Bréal, "Quelques mots sur

l'instruction publique" (1872), p. 300: "France produces more works on

sericiculture than on the direction of colleges; rules and a few works

already ancient suffice for us."]

[Footnote 6328: On this day the monarchy of King Louis-Phillippe

collapsed and the Republic was declared. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6329: "L'Église et l'État sous la monarchie de juillet," by

Thureau-Dangin, 481-483.]

[Footnote 6330: Law of March 15, 1850 (Report by M. Beugnot).]

[Footnote 6331: Law of March 15, 1850, art. 21.]

[Footnote 6332: Law of March 15, 1850, article 21.]

[Footnote 6333: "Ambroise Rendu et l'Université de France," by E. Rendu,

p.128 (January, 1850). The discretionary power given to the prefects to

punish "the promoters of socialism" among the teachers in the primary

schools.--Six hundred and eleven teachers revoked.--There was no less

repression and oppression in the secondary and higher departments of

instruction.]

[Footnote 6334: Kingdom of July, (Louis-Philippe from 1830 to

24-2-1848.) (SR.)]

[Footnote 6335: De Riancey, ibid., II.., 476. (Words of M. Saint-Marc

Girardin.) "We instruct, we do not bring up (children); we cultivate

and develop the mind, not the heart."--Similar evidence, as for instance

that of M. Dubois, director of the Ecole Normale and of M. Guizot,

minister of public instruction. "Education is not up to the level of

instruction." (Exposition of the intent of the law of 1836.)]

[Footnote 6336: De Riancey, ibid., II., 401, 475.--Thureau-Dangin,

ibid., 145 and 146.--(Words of a fervent Catholic, M. de Montalembert, on

the trial of the Free School, Sept.29, 1831.) "It is with a heart still

distressed with these souvenirs (personal) that I here declare that,

were I a father, I would rather see my children crawl their whole life

in ignorance and idleness than expose them to the horrible risk I ran

myself of obtaining a little knowledge at the cost of their father's

faith, at the price of everything that is pure and fresh in their soul

and of honor and virtue in their breast."--(Testimony of a zealous

Protestant, M. de Gasparin.) "Religious education does not really

exist in the colleges. I remember with horror how I was on finishing

my national education. Were we good citizens? I do not know. But it

is certain that we were not Christians."--Testimony of a free-thinker,

Sainte-Beuve.) "In mass, the professors of the University, without being

hostile to religion, are not religious. The pupils feel this, and they

leave this atmosphere, not fed on irreligion, but indifferent.... One

goes away from the University but little of a Christian."]

[Footnote 6337: Boissier, ibid., p.712]

[Footnote 6338: In my youth, I was able to talk with some of those who

lived during the Consulate. All agreed in opinion. One, an admirer of

Condillac and founder of a boarding-school, had written for his pupils a

number of small elementary treatises, which I still possess.]

[Footnote 6339: Charles Hamel, "Histoire de Juilly," pp. 413, 419

(1818).--Ibid., 532, 665 (April 15, 1846.) The Tontine Association

replaced by a limited association (40 years) with a capital of 500,000

francs in 1000 shares of 500 francs each, etc.]

[Footnote 6340: For example, "Monge," the "École Alsacienne," the "École

libre des Sciences Politiques." Competent jurists recommend the founders

of a private school to organize it under the form of a commercial

association, with profit for its aim and not the public good. If the

founders of the school wish to maintain the free management of it they

must avoid declaring it "of public utility."]

[Footnote 6341: The "École Alsacienne" has been supported for some years

mainly by a subsidy of 40,000 francs allotted by the State. This year

the State furnishes, "Monge" and "Sainte-Barbe" with subsidies of

130,000 and 150,000 francs, without which they would become bankrupt and

close their doors. The State probably thus supports them so as to have

a field of pedagogic experiences alongside of its lycées, or to prevent

their being bought by some Catholic corporation.]

[Footnote 6342: Even when the masters are conciliatory or reserved

the two institutions face each other and the pupils are aware of the

antagonism; hence, they turn a cold shoulder to the pupils, education

and ideas of the rival institution. In 1852, and on four circular

journeys from 1863 to 1866, I was able to observe these sentiments which

are now very manifest.]

[Footnote 6343: The period of the annual school examinations in

France.--Tr.]

[Footnote 6344: This word means something more than an ordinary

"boarding-school," as the reader will see by the text, and is therefore

retained as untranslatable.--Tr.]

[Footnote 6345: Expositione universelle of 1889, "Rapport du jury,"

group II., 1st part, P.492.--Documents collected in the bureaus of

public instruction for 1887. (To the internes here enumerated must

be added those of private secular establishments, 8958 out of 20,174

pupils.)--Bréal, "Excursions pedagogiques," pp.293, 298.]

[Footnote 6346: All these figures are today in 1998, 100 years later,

no longer valid, they are only included in order to understand Taine's

insights into human nature and education in general. In 1994-5 there

were, in the State lycées and colleges over 4 millions students and

only those whose parents live too far from the schools, or some 9%, are

boarders. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6347: Today, in 1998, the number of pupils living on French

school premises amount to approximatively 10%, mostly because the

parents live too far away from the school. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6348: Bréal, ibid., pp. 10, 13. Id., "Quelques mots sur

l'instruction publique," p. 286. "The internat is nearly unknown in

Germany.... The director (of the gymnase) informs parents where families

can be found willing to receive boarders and he must satisfy himself

that their hospitality is unobjectionable.... In the new gymnases

there is no room for boarders."--Demogeot et Montucci, "Rapport sur

l'enseignement secondaire en Angleterre et en Ecosse," 1865.--(I

venture also to refer the reader to my "Notes sur l'Angleterre," for a

description of Harrow-on-the-Hill and another school at Oxford, made on

the spot.)]

[Footnote 6349: Taine, "Notes sur l'Angleterre," P.139. The pupils of

the superior class (sixth form), especially the first fifteen of the

class (monitors), the first pupil in particular, have to maintain order,

insure respect for the rules and, taking it all together, take the place

of our maitres d'étude.]

[Footnote 6350: Bréal, "Quelques mots, etc.," pp.281, 282. The same

in France, "before the Revolution,... except in two or three large

establishments in Paris, the number of pupils was generally sufficiently

limited.... At Port-Royal the number of boarders was never over fifty

at one time."--"Before 1764, most of the colleges were day-schools with

from 15 to 80 pupils," besides the scholarships. and peasant boarders,

not very numerous.--"An army of boarders, comprising more than one half

of our bourgeois class, under a drill regulated and overlooked by the

State, buildings holding from seven to eight hundred boarders--such

is what one would vainly try to find anywhere else, and which is

essentially peculiar to contemporary France."]

[Footnote 6351: Bréal, ibid., 287, id., "Excursions pedagogiques," p.

10. "I took part (with these pupils) in a supper full of gayety in the

room of the celebrated Latinist, Corssen, and I remember the thought

that passed through my mind when recurring to the meal we silently

partook of at Metz, two hundred of us, under the eye of the censor

and general superintendent, and menaced with punishment, in our cold,

monastic refectory."]

[Footnote 6352: Even though Taine had visited Eton and other English

schools, he appears to have a somewhat rosy picture of life inside these

institutions. I have been 9 years to a similar school and can assure the

reader that the headmaster's wife is no suitable substitute for a real

mother and her table does not replace one's own home. The rector of my

school once stated that boarding schools should only be resorted to when

one could not remain at home. It was my impression that this school had

two effects upon me: the first that I wanted, in spite of good grades,

to stop my studies and get a job and the second that I became, like

Taine, an opponent to the system. Later on in life I should come to

appreciate all the useful things like languages, literature, math and

physics which I had learned in this well-organized school. I also came

to understand that much worse than harsh discipline is no discipline and

no learning at all, something which happened to my children when they

attended, for one year only, the American School in Bangkok. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6353: Pelet de la Lozère, "Opinions de Napoleon au Conseil

d'État," p.172. (Session of April 7, 1807:) "The professors are to be

transferred from place to place in the Empire according to necessity."

--Decree of May 1, 1802, article 21: "The three functionaries in

charge of the administration and the professors of the lycées may be

transferred from the weakest to the strongest lycées and from inferior

to superior places according to the talent and zeal they show in their

functions."]

[Footnote 6354: A splendid description which also fits the international

civil servants working for the United Nations. I know this because I

was one for 32 years of my life. I suspect it also fits members of the

police forces, secret or not. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6355: Act of Jan. 11, 1811.--Decree of March 17, 1808,

articles 101 and 102.]

[Footnote 6356: Boissier ("Revue du Deux Mondes," Aug. 15, 1869, p.

919): "The externe lycées cost and the interne lycées bring in."]

[Footnote 6357: "Statistique de l'enseigncnient secondaire" (46,816

pupils, of which 33,092 internes and 13,724 externes).--Abbé Bougaud,

"Le Grand Péril de l'Eglise du France," p. 135.--"Moniteur," March 14,

1865, Speech of Cardinal Bonnechose in the Senate.]

[Footnote 6358: Name of the navy school-ship at Brest.--TR.]

[Footnote 6359: Bréal, "Quelques mots, etc.," p. 308: "We need not be

surprised that our children, once out of the college, resemble horses

just let loose, kicking at every barrier and committing all sorts of

capers. The age of reason has been artificially retarded for them five

or six years."]

[Footnote 6360: On the tone and turn of conversation among boys in

school on this subject in the upper classes and even earlier, I can

do no more than appeal to the souvenirs of the reader.--Likewise,

on another danger of the internat, not less serious, which cannot be

mentioned. (Here Taine undoubtedly refers to homosexuality. (SR.))]

[Footnote 6361: Bréal, "Excursions pédagogiques," pp. 326, 327.

(Testimony of two university graduates.) "The great college virtue is

comradeship, which comprises a bond of union among the pupils and hatred

of the master." (Bessot:) "Punishment irritates those who undergo it and

engenders punishment. The pupils become wearied: they fall into a state

of mute irritability coupled with contempt for the system itself and for

those who apply it. Unruliness furnishes them with the means of avenging

themselves or at least to relax their nerves; they commit disorders

whenever they can commit them with impunity.... The interdiction of an

act by authority is sufficient to excite the glory of committing it."

(A. Adam, "Notes sur l'administration du'un lycée.")--Two independent

and original minds have recounted their impressions on this subject,

one, Maxime Du Camp, who passed through the lycée system, and the other,

George Sand, who would not tolerate if for her son. (Maxime Du Camp,

"Souvenirs littéraires," and George Sand, "Histoire de ma vie.")]

[Footnote 6362: All this was in 1890, a long time ago, and if there was

much to learn then, how much do we not have to learn now? It helped,

however, to reduce the curriculum, that Latin and Greek was removed from

middle and senior high school programs and that international Socialism

through the Politically Correct movement, either forbade or rewrote

history, art and literature. In science, however, the young engineers

and scientists have a lot more to learn today and that in all branches

of science and especially in electronics. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6363: The so-called "Grandes Ecoles" which exist today

and which continue to form the French administrative, commercial

and scientific elite. They cannot be done away with since the French

universities have become accessible for an ever increasing number of

students since nearly 50% of the population pass their "bac" or final

high school exam. The level of this exam has decreased year after year

and only the preparatory schools for the Grande Ecoles continue to

insist on verifying diligence and attention. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6364: Taine expresses this in the following manner: "elle a

imaginé quantité de cours surérogatoires et de luxe,.." (SR.)]

[Footnote 6365: This year (1892) 1750 candidates were entered or 240

vacancies in the École Polytechnique, 230 for 30 places in the École des

Beaux-Arts (section of Architecture) and 266 for 24 places in the École

Normale (section of Literature).]

[Footnote 6366: 1890.]

[Footnote 6367: In France today, in 2000, there are still preparatory

schools which, in two or three years after their baccalaureat, prepare

the young applicants for the various competetive entrance examinations

to the "Grande Ecoles". 4000 specially selected students vie annually

with each other for the 400 places in the École Polytechnique. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6368: I was once, writes Taine, an examiner for admission to

a large special school and speak from experience.. Taine was well placed

to know about the system since he was first in the competetive entrance

exam (concours) to the École Normale Superior, and had also passed all

his other studies with great brilliance. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6369: A practical apprenticeship in the Faculty of Medicine

is less retarded; the future doctors, after the third year of their

studies, enter a hospital for two years, ten months of each year or 284

days of service, including an "obstetrical stage" of one months. Later,

on competing for the title of physician or surgeon in the hospitals and

for the aggrégation of the Faculty, the theoretical preparation is as

onerous as that of other careers.]

[Footnote 6370: "Souvenirs" by Chancellor Pasquier. (Written in 1843).

(Étienne Dennis Pasquier (Paris 1767--id. 1862) was a high official

under Napoleon, and President of the upper house under Louis-Phillippe

and author of "L'Histoire de mon temps", published posthumously in

1893. Librarie Plon, Paris 1893. On page 16 and 17 in volume I he fully

confirms Taine's views. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6371: Idem., Nobody attended the Lectures of the Law faculty

of Paris, except sworn writers who took down the professor's dictation

and sold copies of it. "These were nearly all supported by arguments

communicated beforehand... At Bourges, everything was got through within

five or six months at most."]

[Footnote 6372: "Souvenirs" by Chancellor Pasquier, vol. I. p.

17. Nowadays, "the young man who enters the world at twenty-two,

twenty-three or twenty-four years of age, thinks that he has nothing

more to learn; he commonly starts with absolute confidence in himself

and profound disdain for whoever does not share in the ideas and

opinions that he has adopted. Full of confidence in his own force,

taking himself at his own value, he is governed by one single thought,

that of displaying this force and this estimate himself immediately so

as to demonstrate what he is worth." This must have been written around

1830. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6373: This last quality is given by Sainte-Beuve.]

[Footnote 6374: Dunoyer, "De la liberté du travail" (1845), II.,119. The

extraordinary progress of England in the mechanical arts, according to

English engineers, "depends much less on the theoretical knowledge of

scholars than on the practical skill of the workmen who always succeed

better in overcoming difficulties than cultivated minds." For example,

Watt, Stephenson, Arkwright, Crampton and, in France, Jacquart.]

[Footnote 6375: Today, in year 2000, the socialist revolutionaries

have, through the Human Rights activities broken the chain between the

generations, forbidden the parents, the teachers and the supervisors

to correct and discipline their children and apprentices. The French

educational system, perfectly equal, still survives and is probably the

best in existence since it insists on teaching the students even if

a lot of the curriculum is a dead loss. The final product is still a

useful citizen and functionary, something which make France tick. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6376: Bréal, "Quelques mots," etc.,, p. 336. (He quotes M.

Cournot, a former rector, inspector-general, etc.:) "The Faculties know

that they would be subject to warnings on the part of the authorities

as well as to comparisons and regrettable desertions on the part of the

pupils if the proportion between candidates and admissions did not

vary between 45 and 50%... When the proportion of postponements reaches

between 50 and 555 the examiners admit with groans, considering the hard

times, candidates of which they would reject at least one half their

hands were not tied." (This was 100 years ago, today less than 30%

on the average, but more than 70% in certain bad areas, fail their

Baccalauréat. The curriculum has, however, been lightened so that about

50% of the population may end up passing their baccalauréat. Democracy

oblige. (SR.))]

[Footnote 6377: A machine for the forced feeding of ducks and geese to

make their liver grow to excessive proportions.]

[Footnote 6378: An old professor, after thirty years of service,

observed to me by way of summing up: "One half, at least, of our pupils

are not fitted to receive the instruction we give them."]

[Footnote 6379: Lately, the director of one of these schools remarked

with great satisfaction and still greater naïveté: "This school is

superior to all others of its kind in Europe, for nowhere else is what

we teach taught in the same number of years."]

[Footnote 6380: But what if Taine was mistaken? What if he, like so

many other highly talented and intelligent men, took his own superb

intelligence and imagination for granted? What if the talent of such

men is inherited? We know from identical twins how many of our

particularities have been given to us at birth. What if most men are

lazy and especially intellectually so, what if we can only be made to

learn and think when under great stress, the stress introduced by fear

of dismissal or hope of promotion or riches? Then the French system is

perhaps hard, perhaps expensive but certainly useful in producing

the great number of hardworking and competent and passively obedient

supervisors and civil servants that any large organization needs. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6381: "Souvenirs", by Pasquier (Etienne-Dennis, duc),

chancelier de France, in VI volumes, Librarie Plon, Paris 1893. Although

pupils were admitted in the preparatory Schools very early, "our navy,

engineer and artillery officers were justly esteemed the best instructed

in Europe, as able practically as theoretically; the position occupied

by artillery and engineer officers from 1792 in the French army

sufficiently attests this truth. And yet they did not know one tenth of

those who now issue from the preparatory schools. Vauban himself would

have been unable to undergo the examination for admission into the

Polytechnic School." There is then in our system "a luxury of science,

very fine in itself, but which is not necessary to insure good service

on land or at sea." The same in civil careers, with the bar, in the

magistracy, in the administration and even in literature and the

sciences. The proof of this is found in the men of great talent who,

after 1789, were prominent in the Constituent Assembly. In the new-born

University there was not one half of the demand for attainments as is

now exacted. There is nothing like our over-loaded baccalauréat, and yet

there issued from it Villemain, Cousin, Hugo, Lamartine, etc. No École

Polytechnique existed, and yet at the end of the eighteenth century in

France, we find the richest constellation of savants, Lagrange, Laplace,

Monge, Fourcroy, Lavoisier, Berthollet, Haüy, and others. (Since the

date of these souvenirs (1843) the defects in the French system have

gotten worse.]

[Footnote 6382: In England and in the United States the architect

and engineer produce more than we do with greater pliancy, fertility,

originality and boldness of invention, with a practical capacity at

least equal and without having passed six, eight or ten years in purely

theoretical studies.--Cf. Des Rousiers, "La Vie Américaine," p. 619:

"Our polytechnicians are scientific erudites.... The American engineer

is not omniscient as they were, he is special." "But, in his specialty

he has profound knowledge; he is always trying to make it more perfect

by additions, and he does more than the polytechnician to advance his

science" or his art. (Since Taine noted this times have changed; I once

put my 3 older sons into the American school in Bangkok (in 1972),

and not only did they not learn anything during their year there, they

actually lost some of their reading and writing skills and I had to

remove them as soon as I could. (SR.)).]

[Footnote 6383: In 1889 a law called Freycinet, France introduced 3

years of military service for all young men. Students and married men

were, subject to certain conditions, released after one year of service.

(SR.)]

[Footnote 6384: To facilitate his or her comprehension the reader

might replace the word Jacobin with the expression Socialist, Marxist,

national-socialist or Communist since they are all heirs to the

heritage left by the French Revolutionaries. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6385: IIIrd Republique lasted from 14-9-1870 until 13-7-1940.

(SR.)]

[Footnote 6386: Instruction is good, not in itself, but through the good

it does, and especially to those who possess or acquire it. If, simply

by raising his finger, a man could enable every French man or woman to

read Virgil readily and demonstrate Newton's binomial theory, this man

would be dangerous and ought to have his hands tied; for, should he

inadvertently raise his finger, manual labor would be repugnant and, in

a year or two, become almost impossible in France.]

[Footnote 6387: And so it happened. After the second world war, when

international Marxism became installed its agents throughout the Western

world, compulsory, unified education was pushed from the age of 14 to

16 and a majority of young remained in school till after their 18th

birthday, an education which successfully made them believe that the

attitudes and values they were taught were the only valid ones. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6388: Liard, "Universités et Facultés," p. 39 and following

pages.--"Rapport sur la statistique comparée de l'instruction," vol.

II. (1888).--"Exposition universelle de 1889" ("Rapport du jury," groupe

II., part I., p.492.)]

[Footnote 6389: In 1994 there were in France 1389 public and 841 private

lycées (SR.)]

[Footnote 6390: Liard, ibid., p. 77.]

[Footnote 6391: Also called the preparatory classes, the so-called

math-sup and math-spe of the preparatory schools attached to the state

lycées and attended by selected 18-20 year-old students. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6392: These figures were obtained in the bureaux of the

direction of primary instruction.--The sum-total of 582,000,000 francs

is composed of 241,000,000, furnished directly by the State, 28,000,000

furnished by the departments, and 312,000, 000 furnished by the

communes. The communes and departments being, in France, appendices of

the State, subscribe only with its permission and under its impulsion.

Hence the three contributions furnish only one.--Cf. Turlin,

"Organisation financière et budget de l'Instruction primaire," p. 61.

(In this study, the accounts are otherwise made up. Certain

expenses being provided for by annuities are carried into the annual

expenditure:) "From June 1, 1878, to Dec. 31, 1887, expenses of first

installation, 528 millions; ordinary expenses in 1887, 173 millions."]

[Footnote 6393: Law of June 16, 1881 (on gratuitous education).]

[Footnote 6394: Law of March 28, 1882 (on obligatory education).]

[Footnote 6395: National temperament must here be taken into

consideration as well as social outlets. Instruction out of proportion

with and superior to condition works differently with different nations.

For the German adult it is rather soothing and a derivative; with the

adult Frenchman it is especially an irritant or even an explosive.]

[Footnote 6396: It might be interesting to note what Mark Twain wrote on

India education about the same period when Taine wrote this text:

"apparently, then, the colleges of India were doing what our high

schools have long been doing--richly over-supplying the market for

highly educated service; and thereby doing a damage to the scholar,

and through him to the country. At home I once made a speech deploring

the injuries inflicted by the High School in making handicrafts

distasteful to boys who would have been willing to make a living at

trades and agriculture if they had but had the good luck to stop with

the common school. But I made no converts. Not one, in a community

overrun with educated idlers who were above following their fathers'

mechanical trades, yet could find no market for their book-knowledge."]

[Footnote 6397: Among the pupils who receive this primary instruction

the most intelligent, who study hardest, push on and pass an examination

by which they obtain the certificate that qualifies them for elementary

teaching. The consequences are as follows. Comparative table of annual

vacancies in the various services of the prefecture of the Seine and of

the candidates registered for these places. ("Débats," Sep. 16, 1890:)

Vacancies for teachers, 42; number of registered candidates, 1,847.

Vacancies for female teachers, 54; number of candidates, 7,139.--7,085

of these young women, educated and with certificates, and who cannot

get these places, must be content to marry some workman, or become

housemaids, and are tempted to become lorettes. (From the church of

Notre Dame de Lorette in Paris in the neighborhood of which many young,

pretty women of easy virtue were to be found. (SR.))]

[Footnote 6398: Taine wrote this when compulsory education in France

kept the children in school until their 13th year. Today in year 2000

they must stay until they are 16 years old but more often continue until

they are 19--23 years old. (SR.)]

[Footnote 6399: In certain cases, the school commission may grant

exemptions. But there art two or three parties in each commune, and the

father of a family must stand well with the dominant party to obtain

them.]

[Footnote 63100: After the second world war the world, helped by the

United Nations, have pushed obligatory education further and further,

and the number of dissatisfied youth have consequently increased and

increased. (SR.)]

[Footnote 63101: Law of March 28, 1882, and Oct. 30, 1886.]

[Footnote 63102: "Journal des Débats," Sep. 1, 1891. Report of the

Commission on Statistics: "In 1878-9 the number of congregationist

schools was 23,625 with 2,301,943 pupils."]

[Footnote 63103: Bureaux of the direction of public instruction, budget

of 1892.]

[Footnote 63104: "Exposition universelle" of 1889. "Rapport général," by

M. Alfred Picard, p. 367. At the same date, the number of pupils in

the public schools was 4,500,119.--"Journal des Débats," Sep. 12, 1891,

Report of the commission of statistics. "From 1878-79 to 1889-90, 5,063

public congregationist schools are transformed into secular schools or

suppressed; at the time of their transformation they enumerated in

all 648,824 pupils.--Following upon this secularization, 2,839 private

congregationist schools are opened as competitors and count in 1889-90,

354,473 pupils."--In ten years public secular instruction gains 12,229

schools and 973,380 pupils; public congregationist instruction

loses 5,218 schools and 550,639 pupils. On the other hand, private

congregationist instruction gains 3,790 schools and 413,979 pupils."]

[Footnote 63105: Turlin, ibid, p. 61. (M. Turlin enumerates "104,765

functionaries," to which must be added the teaching, administrative and

auxiliary staff of teachers of the 173 normal schools and their 3000

pupils, all gratuitous). (In 1994 there were 247 000 primary school

teachers (instituteurs) in public schools in France. Taine could not

foresee that the French schools and universities should become an

enormous industry, the number of teachers and universities multiplied by

ten and the number of government functionaries multiplied by 20 and that

the annual 50 000 vacancies should find more than a million candidates,

the young overeducated persons dreaming of becoming functionaries and

hence "safe" for life. (SR.))]

[Footnote 63106: In this respect, very instructive indications may be

found in the autobiography of Jules Valès, "l'Enfant," "le Bachelier,"

and "l'Insurge." Since 1871, not only in literature do the successful

works of men of talent but, again, the abortive attempts of impotent

innovators and blasted half-talents, converge to this point."]

End of The Modern Regime, Volume 2, End of The Origins of Contemporary

France, Volume 6

The Modern Regime, Volume 2 · 第 6 / 6 章