Preaching to College Students (1928)

Preaching to college students is one of the most exacting of homiletic

responsibilities. This is the case not so much because students are

critical as because they are the world in the making, and the tomorrows

will be just about as religious as they are. By some means the message

must be put across to them.

Preaching to such a constituency is no longer the task of the few. Almost

every preacher has more or less of it to do because the influence of the

college now reaches everywhere. In the university centers we deal with

students in large groups, but in the smallest country community one finds

at least a few. A sermon must be as worthwhile for the few as for the

many. So the problem is one of general interest.

The presence of students in his congregation should be a great blessing to

a minister. It is a high challenge to him to do his best work. The mind of

the student is alert, and his work, so far as it goes, is with current

data. Therefore, the man who interests him must be wide awake and well

informed. For such an influence any minister should be deeply grateful.

Great numbers of college students and graduates are in the churches. Still

greater numbers are not unwilling to be, and will be when the motive is

clear. But the reason must certainly be established. Will the student

derive benefit from the sermon? If not, he is not interested and that is

the end of it. If so, he is interested and will respond. This is only as

it should be.

The average student likes to be preached to and dealt with as a human

being. True, the species includes a few mutations who like to think they

belong to some other order of creation, but most students know better and

the rest will have abundant opportunity to learn better.

The college student is nothing but a boy or girl from the farm dwelling,

the village home, or the city mansion, translated into a campus setting.

The law of adaptation operates, and certain temporary colorations, habits

and appendages develop, all of which will pass with the next change of

environment. These youngsters are still flesh and blood however and it may

be said of them as it may be said of anybody that their need is for the

universal gospel preached in the most honest and interesting possible way.

The student is dealt with as such during the days of the week. His

professors may be depended upon not to let him forget that he is a

student. When the worship hour comes he is glad of an opportunity to

forget it for the time being and to occupy the honorable position of

a human being made in the spiritual image of his God.

It is a great mistake to preach to students in the terms and imagery of

campus life. The preacher who starts in to show his audience how much he

has engaged in athletics, how familiar he is with fraternity and social

life, and how finally he has solved the old and largely imaginary problem

of the conflict between science and religion, will only succeed in making

himself ridiculous. Students do not come to church to hear about things

concerning which they know more than the preacher does. They come to hear

about things of which he is presumed to know more than they do. Therefore,

the safest as well as the most helpful thing he can do is to keep

to religion.

It is also a mistake to suppose that the student mind reacts unfavorably

against serious things. It may appreciate the witticism which helps to

illuminate a serious point in the discussion, and a first class reductio

ad absurdum nearly always clinches a proposition, but mere buffoonery will

make a small and brief appeal. The person who attempts thus to denature

the gospel he preaches will not meet with permanent favor.

This is the case because the student mind is essentially serious. One

might not think so after a superficial observance of student actions,

but it is so nevertheless. The very laughter and jesting one hears in

student circles often mask the most earnest questionings, the deepest

longings, and the most serious attitudes.

So long as one keeps himself, as he should do, within the limits of honest

conviction, and so long as one speaks, as he should speak, in the spirit

of love and good will, no other class of people in the world is so ready

to have him be brutally frank as are college students. In fact, they

discount him if he shows any evidence of evasion or accommodation. They

may be right about some things and wrong about other things, but they are

honest in all things, and they expect him to be the same.

Any one of the fields of thought and knowledge is a serious matter with

the honest investigator. It is so dealt with in the classroom and the

laboratory. To the student religion is just one more field to be explored.

If he does not care to explore it, he does not bother. If he does care to

explore it, he does not regard it as a joke. The person who thus

approaches it with a sincere purpose should receive honest help.

All this leads me to the point where I can say that one of the fine things

about the student mind is that it has discarded all traditions and

prejudices. It approaches any matter with a disposition to find and face

the facts, whatever the consequences may be. It is a real _tabula rasa_,

upon which one may write—provided he has a stylus that is sharp enough.

Surely this is an opportunity to bring delight to the soul of the honest

preacher. The most deadening thing in the world, intellectually and

spiritually, is the practice of preaching platitudes and maintaining

traditions which are proven, outworn, or unimportant—maybe all three.

The most uncomfortable position in which any sincere preacher can find

himself is one in which such a type of service is demanded.

The preacher to college students finds himself in no such position. He may

go anywhere he likes within the limits of the field of truth. He has no

traditions to maintain. He is bound by no trammels of creed or dogma. He

is not checked by any barriers of prejudice. His way is open. He has but

to walk in it in the spirit of reverence and honesty. He is dealing with

adventurous minds whose one concern is truth. The mind of Jesus was such

a one, and such an audience really challenges a preacher to approach

questions in the spirit of the Great Teacher.

This is the process that is going to break down the artificialities and

fan out the chaff of unreality from religion. Perpetuating systems is

poor business, but adventuring in the field of truth is a high privilege.

That is what the preacher to college students must do. Granted that it is

in the field of religion, his one test for homiletic material is the

question whether it is true.

One of the most common mistakes made in the popular and superficial

analysis of the student mind is the assumption that it is essentially a

radical mind. This often becomes the basis of a great homiletic error in

preaching to students.

A comparative few students are radical, just as are a comparative few

taken from any group one might mention. But with the mass it is not so.

The great majority of college students are probably more conservative than

the majority of people outside the university world. They think carefully,

act with deliberation, and go quietly about their way while a few

exceptions to the rule take the soap box and loudly demand the immediate

reversal of all things.

I should say that about the last place to go to start a revolution of any

kind would be the average college campus. Yet the campus mind is alive to

the evolution that is going on in everything—including itself.

The student mind would be properly impatient of a static or reactionary

viewpoint, but it is little concerned with wildeyed radicalism of any

kind. The preacher who is most likely to reach its processes is the one

who is honest, fearless, and open-minded, and yet who is conservative in

the sense that he abandons a position only when he has found sufficient

reason for believing that another one is better. The preacher who shows

a conservatism which takes care to be progressive will commend himself

and his message to the student hearer.

The presence of students in one’s congregation should save him from the

pitiful fate of ceasing to grow, and thereby becoming old. They are an

advancing race, and it is his privilege to advance with them. If he does

so, the day will come when he can look back across the years and find

satisfaction in the thought that he has had a real part in the making of

the history of his and succeeding times—that of building the solidness

and savour of ancient truth into the life of the new world.

pg77077 · 第 55 / 123 题