The first scene introduces a young scholar, Tsai-yung, face to face with

the alternatives of remaining in his village to take care of his aged

parents or of going to the capital in search of honors and lucrative

posts. His own wishes are to remain at home, less for his parents’ sake

than because of the beautiful wife whom he has married but two months

ago. But his father urges him to go to Ch’ang An, to use his talents,

and to gain fame and wealth. “At fifteen one must study, at thirty a man

must act.” A friend of the family, an elderly gentleman called Chang,

sides with the father against the mother, who wishes to keep her son at

home. She tells the story of a young man who had left his family to take

the examination at the capital, but who, when at last his learning had

gained him a post as superintendent of an almshouse, found his parents

as inmates in the very institution. The young wife takes no part in

the discussion at all; in fact, the elderly gentlemen seem to consider

affection for her an unmanly weakness on the son’s part. “He thinks of

nothing but love and the sweet pleasures of the nuptial couch,” says his

father. “Here it’s two months that he is married, and yet one cannot tear

him away from this place.” This represents a very common attitude in

China—I remember reading in a Peking paper in 1917 in an attack on the

vice-president of Tsing Hua College that one of his faults was that he

occasionally went walking with his wife! One of my students from Shansi

told me one day that he had been married during the summer vacation.

I asked whether his wife was with him in Peking, and when he answered

in the negative, whether he was writing to her. “Oh, no,” he said

shamefacedly, “I wouldn’t do such a thing.”

[Illustration: A CHINESE ARTIST’S CONCEPTION OF TWO PIOUS SOULS]

The father calls on the son to state what he understands by filial piety.

The son answers by quoting the “Book of Rites,” “It is the duty of the

son to take every care that in summer as well as in winter his parents

should enjoy all comforts of life. He must every evening himself arrange

the bed on which they are to sleep; every morning at the first crowning

of the cock he must inquire in affectionate terms about the state of

their health; then, in the course of the day, he must ask repeatedly

whether they are suffering from the cold or whether the heat incommodes

them. The duty of the son is to watch over his parents wherever they go,

to love those whom they love, honor those whom they honor; he must even

love the horses and dogs whom his father loves.” And he adds from the

“Sayings of Confucius”: “A son should not leave the home of his father

and his mother so long as they are still living.”

To this the father retorts with a quotation from “The Book of Filial

Piety”; “The first degree of filial piety consists in serving one’s

parents; the second in serving one’s prince, and the third in seeking

after honors.” The father persuades the son to go. His son will soon be a

mandarin, he says, and then, “The three kinds of meat (beef, mutton and

pork) and the rare foods which are offered up in the great sacrifices

will be served to me three times a day in tripods of elegant form or

in dishes of fine porcelain. That will be better than eating beans and

drinking water.”

But the mother gives expression to her grief in a metaphor praised by

Chinese commentators: “In a moment they will tear away the pearl I was

holding in my hand.” Forebodings of evil fill her heart. “Go then, my

son, but if during your absence your father and mother should die of

hunger and cold, your honor will not therefore be smirched when you

return in an embroidered robe.”

The second scene of the play transfers the action to Ch’ang An, the

old capital. With the symmetry so characteristic of all Chinese art

the action of the drama is divided almost equally between the scenes

in Tsai-yung’s native village, and those in the imperial city. We are

introduced into the palace of an imperial minister, a certain Niu,

and here through the words of a maidservant we learn of the dull,

tedious, joyless life in the women’s apartments. The author pictures

the minister’s daughter, Niu-hsi, as the model young woman who prefers

working at embroidery to playing in the open air. The servant girl on

the other hand is sad because spring (used symbolically for love) is

passing her by. In a beautiful allegory on spring and its manifestations

she gives expression to her feelings, while her mistress cites in reply

the ancient Chinese rule of conduct: “Women must not leave the interior

apartments.” The scene seems to be a protest on the author’s part against

this cruel stunting of the lives of his countrywomen.

Into Minister Niu’s house come two rival go-betweens who make offers

of marriage for Niu’s daughter in the interest of two fathers of

distinguished sons. But Niu refuses; he will accept for his daughter none

but the scholar who has won the very highest honors at the examinations.

The two women begin to quarrel and are driven off with blows by Niu’s

orders, because by fighting in his house they offend against the rites.

A marriage arranged by such wrangling old hags between young people who

meet for the first time on the day of their wedding certainly does not

offer much in the way of romance. An even more depressing picture of

the life of the young girl one gains from the manner in which Niu takes

his daughter to task for having walked in the garden. “Don’t you know

of what the principal merit of a young woman consists? I have told you

before, men are looking for women who don’t like to leave the women’s

apartments.” Everywhere the ghost of Confucius giving precepts for the

regulation of the private life down to the minutest details!

The play returns to Tsai-yung, who is now on the road to the capital in

the company of three other candidates for the examination. Each in turn

tells of the purpose of his studies. Tsai-yung outlines his principles as

follows:

“Here is the method I have adopted. When I was seated I read, when

I walked I recited from memory what I had learned. I have studied

thoroughly ten thousand chapters; I have carried on difficult studies

and researches. But as there are two things in life that one must never

lose sight of—loyalty to the prince and filial piety—I have always tried

to show myself grateful for the emperor’s benefits and to return with

thankfulness the kindness of my parents.” This speech is applauded by the

other scholars and they in turn give their answers, some of which are of

rather satirical turn, especially the one of the student who explains

that with him the essential is correct pronunciation and beautiful

penmanship!

The next scene presents a burlesque on the literary examinations. It

recalls somewhat an entrance examination given in a “prep” school I once

attended, where the older students, dressed up in frock coats and with

false beards on their faces, took the part of faculty. The examination

of freshmen consisted of the singing of hymns, the shining of shoes, and

a guessing contest as to which of the “professors” had paddled them in

the rear. The imperial examiner announces solemnly to the five hundred

candidates that the present test would not be like last year’s, when they

had been asked to write essays, one on literature, another on morals,

and a third on politics, but that he was going to ask them first, to

compose a rhyme; second, to guess a riddle; and third, to sing a song.

Needless to state, Tsai-yung passes with flying colors in this test full

of humorous puns which are, of course, untranslatable. The examiner is

made to say at the end, “Tsai-yung, I recognize the superiority of your

talents, your learning is indeed profound; you rise far above the others;

your merit is most extraordinary. Immediately I am going to apprise the

emperor of the outcome of the examinations!” This scene leads one to

suspect that the author of the play had good reasons for venting his

satire on the inane literary competitions—probably he had failed and was

therefore forced to waste his talents in a life of retirement.

[Illustration: A SCHOLAR

Chinese Character Type]

The real hero, or rather heroine, of the play now appears for the first

time, namely Tsai-yung’s young wife Wu-niang. No news has come from

the capital as to her husband’s success, a famine is ravishing the

district, and the old parents of Tsai-yung are making one trip to the

pawnshop after the other. But Wu-niang is determined to do her duty

as daughter-in-law; she is going to show filial piety to the last in

conformity with precepts such as the following, quoted from the “Book of

Rewards and Punishments”, a work which is not for sale in bookshops but

is distributed in the temples to the pious: “A daughter-in-law must serve

the father and mother of her husband as a daughter serves her father and

mother. She must show filial piety and complete obedience. If she lacks

in her duty toward them she lacks at the same time filial piety. This

crime always becomes known to Heaven, as the following story illustrates.

In the territory of Chang-Chu there were three sisters-in-law entirely

lacking in filial piety. One day they heard a clap of thunder and at the

same time they were changed: one into a cow, the second into a lamb, and

the third into a dog; their heads alone preserved the original form....

Chin-ing, the governor of that district, had an engraving made showing

the metamorphoses and had it distributed among the people to teach them a

lesson. That is how Heaven punishes!”

Wu-niang’s immediate duty is to try to make peace between her aged

parents-in-law. Tsai’s wife is not slow in telling her husband “I told

you so” in regard to the evils that have followed their son’s departure,

while Tsai naturally enough does not become any calmer for being told

what a fool he is. To appease their wrath and to supply a bit of food

Wu-niang pawns the few hairpins and other ornaments that she possesses.

While his parents are slowly dying of hunger, Tsai-yung, by his brilliant

record, has attracted the attention of the emperor himself. The latter

orders that the daughter of Minister Niu, who has been refused to many a

deserving suitor, should be given to him. Niu is overjoyed to receive as

a son-in-law the candidate accorded the highest honors and immediately

sends a go-between to arrange the affair. However, she returns to

announce that Tsai-yung refuses, because he is married and has various

obligations toward his parents. But the real reason, she whispers, is

that the bride’s feet are too long. Minister Niu flies into a rage; he

says that no one would any longer respect his position if he were to

accept this refusal. He is going to speak to the emperor about it. Small

wonder that under the circumstances Tsai-yung’s petition to the emperor

to be allowed to return home is refused; instead he is again ordered to

marry Niu-hsi in a mandate beginning with the words, “If filial piety is

the basis of all virtues, then the perfection of all morals consists in

serving one’s prince.” With tears he leaves the imperial palace and must

submit to being married against his wishes to a second wife. He regrets

that he cannot return to his parents (does not seem to feel any regrets

about Wu-niang) and breaks out into a lamentation: “High reputation is a

tie that binds; good fortune is an iron chain. Fortune and reputation are

the instruments used by Heaven to inflict tortures on mankind!”

The scene again shifts to the famine-stricken province. A mandarin

finds that a corrupt official has stolen the little grain that is to be

distributed to the poor. This commissioner is caught in the very act,

yet in typical Chinese fashion he has a ready but translucent excuse

to offer; however, when he is threatened with torture he is willing

to confess that he is a robber. This wicked official is then made to

sign a written confession of his guilt and is led off to jail. His kind

appears in hundreds of plays; in fact, he is probably the very favorite

type on the Chinese stage. The mandarin asks Wu-niang why she had come

to the court herself instead of sending a male member of the family;

a woman, he says, should not leave the inner apartments of the house.

It is interesting to note that a Chinese commentator considers this an

erroneous interpretation of the passage in the “Book of Rites”; it is

only the young girl who is not to leave the inner apartments; once a

woman is married she may do so. When the mandarin learns of Wu-niang’s

sad situation, he commands an attendant to give her three portions of the

rice embezzled by the official. Another official, who seems to be hand

in glove with the embezzler, follows Wu-niang and in a lonely place on

the road demands that she return the rice, lest he kill her on the spot.

Wu-niang offers him her clothes; if he will only not demand the food that

is to save the lives of the old people. The black-hearted villain says

that he wants the rice and does not care to expose her limbs to the fury

of the elements. Then comes the young woman’s touching answer, which

reaches perhaps the highest level of a daughter’s devotion: “What matters

it if my body be exposed to the fury of the elements, so long as I can

save the lives of my father-in-law and my mother-in-law!” The cowardly

wretch pretends to be touched and bids her go her way in peace, but as

soon as she is off her guard he snatches from the defenseless woman her

bag of rice. Fearing the reproaches of her parents-in-law Wu-niang plans

suicide, but the memory of her husband’s admonition that she watch over

his parents decides her to continue in the thankless task.

The next scenes show just how ungrateful her parents-in-law are for

her unlimited devotion. Wu-niang herself is eating roots, buds, the

bark of trees, and other things classified as material containing some

slight food values in so-called “famine food books”—a type of literature

enjoying a wide circulation in China. But her suspicious mother-in-law

fears that the young woman is eating better food than she is serving to

her, because Wu-niang eats her miserable stew in private. At one of her

meals the author, by a strange realism, has her say, “When I have eaten

this mess my hunger ceases, but then there begin pains in the intestines

much more violent than the hunger had been.” When the mother-in-law

surprises her she finds that Wu-niang had been extremely self-sacrificing

instead of selfish as she had supposed, and the shock is too much for her

weakened body; she dies.

The husband too is very much enfeebled, and when the friend of the

family, Chang, comes to call, he is mortified that he cannot rise to meet

his guest. Throughout the play there is in the speeches of practically

all the characters an urbanity and a politeness which show how deeply the

lessons of Confucius to do or say always the fitting thing have gone over

into the flesh and blood of his nationals. Wu-niang tells Chang of their

greatest cause for anguish—they have not the means to give the deceased a

proper burial. Chang then shows himself an ideal friend from the Chinese

point of view by saying, “I shall order a servant to prepare a wooden

coffin in which we shall place the body of your wife. I myself shall then

select a lucky day for the funeral, and after having had a grave dug on

the hill in the south, I shall accompany the procession.”

The scene that gives the title to the play is one in which Tsai-yung

gives expression to his tenderest emotion by playing on the lute. This

instrument is regarded by the Chinese as the noblest and æsthetically

the highest musical instrument in existence. A Chinese lover of music

cannot find words to express the delight the lute can provide.[14] As

a general thing the Chinese are ashamed to display emotion, and the

Westerner is often shocked by apparent callousness, as for example when

a person who has just lost a dear relative gives vent to a nervous

laugh instead of yielding to tears when the subject is alluded to.

Therefore it is by means of the lute that Tsai-yung gives expression to

his repressed feelings. He does this with the delicate touch employed

by Chinese painters in their impressionistic pictures and by the poets

in their suggestive verses in which, as some one has said, the i’s are

never dotted, but a definite mood is nevertheless conveyed all the more

forcefully.[15] While Tsai-yung touches the strings of his instrument

one servant fans him with an ivory fan, and a second burns incense, and

a third places his books before him. Under such ideal conditions the

Chinese scholar is quietly singing to his lute.

At this point his newly wedded wife, Niu-hsi, enters. Evidently the

relation between the two is still an extremely distant one, for his wife,

in asking Tsai-yung to sing a ballad for her, remarks that every time

she comes to listen to his music, he stops. She too has her grief which

she would like to have dispelled by sweet music. Tsai-yung begins to

play, “The pheasant in the morning begins his long flight”, and “The wild

duck separated from the companion he loves.” But these songs do not suit

Niu-hsi’s mood. She wants not a song of a disappointed lover, but one to

fit the present situation where husband and wife are together.

“My lord, in the calm of this lovely evening, in full view of this

ravishingly beautiful scenery, sing me the ballad, ‘When the storm wind

moves the pine trees.’” Tsai-yung starts to play it, but alas! as Niu-hsi

discovers, he gradually slips into the air, “When I think of returning to

my native land.”

Niu-hsi is disappointed because she cannot penetrate her husband’s

melancholy mood. He explains that he cannot play better because he has

his old lute no longer. In answer to his wife’s questions Tsai-yung

speaks of his lute with evident symbolism, telling her that he has thrown

his old lute aside but that at the bottom of his heart he loves it still.

Niu-hsi guesses the cause of her husband’s grief, but she cannot persuade

him to confide it to her. The two drink wine together and recite verses,

but when the hour becomes late Tsai-yung asks his wife to retire and

calls for his servant. Before the latter appears Tsai-yung sings to notes

of his lute about a dream in which Wu-niang had appeared to him; but, in

the words of Heine, “Es war ein Traum.”

He asks the servant to find him a trustworthy messenger whom he may send

to his native village to inquire about his parents. But before this

plan is put into operation an impostor appears, bringing an alleged

letter from Tsai-yung’s father, according to which all the family are

enjoying the very best of health. The letter gives the young scholar

great pleasure and earns its bearer a rich reward; Tsai-yung gives the

impostor some pearls and some gold for his father in addition to a letter

in which he states that he is detained at the capital, but that he hopes

to return home soon. Meanwhile, he very humbly begs forgiveness for

the long delay. The false messenger is portrayed in a monologue as the

most cowardly and the direst of villains. That it is so easy for him to

deceive Tsai-yung is not so far-fetched as it may seem to the Westerner,

for the employment of professional letter-writers is a very common

practice in China where the percentage of illiteracy is high.

Of course, the father never receives his son’s letter; on the contrary,

the next scene shows him dying of hunger. His faithful daughter-in-law

watches over him to the last. For three years Tsai-yung has been absent

without so much as sending a letter; therefore the father asks his

daughter-in-law to marry again as soon as he has died. Wu-niang replies

with a Chinese proverb, “No one can serve two masters”, and affirms her

resolve to remain faithful to her husband. He is so grateful to her that

he hopes, according to Buddhist beliefs, to be her daughter-in-law in

his next life while she is to be his father-in-law. He curses the day he

asked his son to leave home and gives to his friend Chang the injunction:

“I leave you my cane. When this ungrateful and disobedient son of mine

returns home, beat him for me with my stick and chase him out of the

house.” With these fatherly words he breathes his last.

In order to earn the money for her father-in-law’s funeral Wu-niang cuts

her hair and tries to sell it in the street. Her bald head gives her the

appearance of a nun, although she feels scarcely worthy of becoming one.

In the anguish of her poverty she runs through the streets, imploring

people not to bargain with a wretched woman in her position, but to help

her by buying the very last thing of value she possesses. The faithful

Chang meets her in the street, and, on learning her story, promises to

send to her house enough money to enable her to bury her father-in-law

properly according to the rites. She in return gives him her hair,

asking him to sell it. He accepts it, but not in order to sell it; far

from that, he is going to keep it until Tsai-yung’s return, in order to

prove to him the full extent of Wu-niang’s filial piety. This piety is

so great that when Wu-niang goes to the cemetery to erect a monument

over the grave of the deceased, a genie, touched by her devotion, comes

to her aid by calling the white monkey of the south and the black tiger

of the north to help him erect this tomb with the well-known speed and

skill that genii possess. He also advises Wu-niang through the medium of

a dream to assume the garb of a nun and to search for her husband in the

capital. Wu-niang decides to follow this advice. She plans to earn her

subsistence by taking with her Tsai-yung’s lute, in order to sing in the

villages songs in praise of filial piety. In order to be able to accord

the spirits of her parents-in-law their proper worship she paints their

portraits and carries them with her. The Octogenarian Chang totters with

Wu-niang to the edge of the village and bids her godspeed on her long

journey.

Meanwhile Tsai-yung has been acting all this time like a man in a stupor,

his wife says. Niu-hsi is pictured as a kindly young woman watching over

her husband with loving care. “What ails you?” she asks. “You have the

finest delicacies served you. You eat boiled tongues of orang-outang and

roasted leopard embryos. You wear robes of violet silk; your belt is a

belt of jade. When you go out or when you return your horse crushes under

foot all manner of flowers which people spread on your path. Your head

is shaded by an umbrella with three layers of silk. Formerly you were

only a poor scholar living in a thatched hut; now you fulfill the highest

functions in the emperor’s palace. You swim in wealth, but this wealth

is not sufficient for you; you do nothing but wrinkle your forehead and

heave sighs.”

Niu-hsi asks many more questions, but her husband refuses to reveal the

cause of his grief. But when she leaves the room Tsai-yung relieves

his feelings in a monologue which she overhears. When he has finished

lamenting his separation from his parents and his wife (the latter is

always mentioned after father and mother), Niu-hsi comes in to say

simply that she will travel with him to his native village, if that is

what he is longing for. He retorts, with the timidity found in most

scholar-heroes in Chinese plays, that he is afraid to let her father

hear of the matter and that he therefore forbids her to mention it. But

the otherwise docile and obedient wife simply overrides his wishes and

takes the matter to her father. The latter is quite willing to give his

permission for the journey; only suggests that it might be better to send

a faithful servant to bring Tsai-yung’s parents and wife to the capital.

This plan is agreed to by all except the servant who, in a somewhat

humorous scene, speaks of the evils that are sure to follow when two

wives are living under one roof. But at last he agrees to go, even though

he feels his mistress will never thank him for having obeyed on this

occasion.

The Chinese theater · 第 3 / 14 段