P.

[62] Gov. Hutchinson omitted this paragraph when he prepared his next

and final draft, which was a judicious proceeding. The above is a view

of the document which may occur to a reader on a first and superficial

examination; and it has been claimed by a late writer that “the paper

is so worded as to mislead.” The paper was drawn by Cotton Mather;

and was “concurringly presented before his Excellency and Council by

twelve ministers” of Boston and the vicinity. (_Cases of Conscience_,

Postscript.) Those twelve men knew the meaning of language; and it

is hardly possible to believe that they would concur, at that solemn

period, in a series of recommendations to the public authorities which

carried a contradiction, if not a fraud, on the face of the document.

Hutchinson’s omission of the passage may be regarded as a retraction

of his first impressions, resulting from further investigation. The

advice, in my opinion, is wholly consistent; but this is not the place

to discuss the point. I purpose to do this on some other occasion.

The witchcraft delusion of 1692 · 第 73 / 87 题