P.

[21] An account of the Walton case was furnished to Increase Mather

by Joshua Moody, then minister at Portsmouth. (_Mather Papers_, p.

361.) The paper is given in _Remarkable Providences_, pp. 114-116, and

_Magnalia_, vol. ii. p. 453.

A long and circumstantial account of the disturbance in George

Walton’s house is the subject-matter of a tract, printed in London,

1698, 15 pp. 4to., a copy of which is in the Dowse Library belonging

to the Massachusetts Historical Society. The title of the tract is

“LITHOBOLIA; or the STONE THROWING DEVIL. Being an exact and true

Account of the various actions of Infernal Spirits, or (Devils

Incarnate) Witches, or both; and the great Disturbance and Amazement

they gave to George Walton’s family, at a place called Great Island,

in the Province of New-Hampshire in New-England.... By R. C. who was

a sojourner in the same family the whole time, and an ocular witness

of these Diabolic Inventions; the contents thereof being manifestly

known to the inhabitants of that Province, and the persons of other

provinces, and is upon record in his Majesty’s Council Court held in

that Province.”

The writer says, “Some time ago being in America, in his Majesty’s

service, I was lodged in the said George Walton’s house, a planter

there.”

The following names appear as attestants of the truth of the

narrative: “Samuel Jennings, Governor of West-Jarsey; Walter Clark,

Deputy-Governor of Road-Island; Arthur Cook; Matt. Borden of

Road-Island; Oliver Hooton of Barbadoes, Merchant; T. Maul of Salem in

N. E. merchant; Capt. Walter Barefoot; John Hussey and John Hussey’s

wife.” The narrative treats of throwing about, by an invisible power,

stones, brick-bats, hammers, mauls, crow-bars, spits and other domestic

utensils, for the period of three months.

“R. C.,” the author of the tract, I have no doubt, was Richard

Chamberlayne, Secretary of the Province of New-Hampshire in 1682.

That he resided at Great Island appears by his signature to several

depositions printed in _New-Hampshire Hist. Coll._, vols. ii. and

viii. Chamberlayne and Barefoot were among the prosecutors of Joshua

Moody at Portsmouth the next year for not conducting his services

according to the English Prayer Book, and occasioned his imprisonment

for three months. It appears that Increase Mather was aware that

Secretary Chamberlayne had prepared an account of the Walton case, and

he wrote to Mr. Moody to procure it, together with a narrative of the

Hortando case. Mr. Moody, July 14, 1683, writes to Mr. Mather: “About

that at G. Walton’s, because my interest runs low with the Secretary,

I have desired Mr. Woodbridge to endeavor the obtaining it; and if

he can get it, shall send it by the first; though if there should be

any difficulty thereabout, you may do pretty well with what you have

already.” (_Mather Papers_, p. 359.) Mr. Moody writes again, August 23:

“My endeavors also have not been a-wanting to obtain the other [the

Walton case], but find it difficult. If more may be gotten, you may

expect [it] when I come, or else must take up with what you had from

me at first, which was the sum of what was then worthy of notice, only

many other particular actings of like nature had been then and since.

It began on a Lord’s day, June 11, 1682, and so continued for a long

time, only there was some respite now and then. The last thing [printed

_sight_] I have heard of was the carrying away of several axes in the

night, notwithstanding they were laid up, yea locked up very safe, as

the owner thought at least, which was done this spring. [Postscript.]

Before sealing of my letter came accidentally to my hand this enclosed

that I had from William Morse of Newbury concerning the troubles at his

house in 1679. If it may be of use to me, you may please to peruse and

return it.” (_Ibid._ 360.)

The Secretary doubtless declined to furnish the unlovely Puritans at

the Bay with his narrative, and, on returning to England, he printed

it in London in 1698. The tract shows that Church-of-England men

were quite as observant of signs and wonders as the Puritans. “Who

that peruses these preternatural occurrences,” asks the writer, “can

possibly be so much of an enemy to his own soul and irrefutable reason,

as obstinately to oppose himself to, or confusedly fluctuate in, the

opinion and doctrine of demons or spirits, and witches?”

The tract is reprinted in _Historical Magazine_ (N.Y., vol. v. pp.

321-327), and is followed (vol. vi. p. 159) with a statement, by

Rev. Lucius Alden, on the persons and localities mentioned therein.

Brewster’s _Rambles about Portsmouth_, 2d series, 1869, has a chapter

on the subject (pp. 343-351), with Mr. Alden’s statement; but none of

these writers seem to be aware that Richard Chamberlayne was the author

of _Lithobolia_. Since writing the above I find the tract under the

name of Richard Chamberlain in British Museum Catalogue, 1814, and the

title was so copied into Watt and Lowndes.

The witchcraft delusion of 1692 · 第 32 / 87 题